DOCSLIB.ORG

Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park Wekiva River Basin State Parks Approved Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 7 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 9 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 9 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................. 10 Public Participation ............................................................................ 10 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 13 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 19 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 19 Topography .................................................................................. 19 Geology ....................................................................................... 20 Soils ............................................................................................ 20 Minerals ....................................................................................... 27 Hydrology .................................................................................... 27 Natural Communities (FNAI) ........................................................... 42 Imperiled Species ......................................................................... 86 Exotic and Nuisance Species ......................................................... 101 Special Natural Features .............................................................. 113 Cultural Resources .......................................................................... 114 Condition Assessment .................................................................. 114 Level of Significance .................................................................... 114 Prehistoric and Historic Archaeological Sites ................................... 115 Historic Structures ...................................................................... 117 Collections ................................................................................. 119 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ............................................... 127 Management Goals, Objectives and Actions ........................................ 127 Natural Resource Management ......................................................... 128 Hydrological Management ............................................................ 128 Natural Communities Management ................................................ 131 Imperiled Species Management .................................................... 143 Exotic Species Management ......................................................... 146 Cultural Resource Management ........................................................ 147 Special Management Considerations .................................................. 150 Timber Management Analysis ....................................................... 150 Arthropod Control Plan ................................................................. 152 Resource Management Schedule ................................................... 152 Land Management Review ............................................................... 152 i LAND USE COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 155 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS .................................................................. 155 Existing Use of Adjacent Lands ......................................................... 156 Planned Use of Adjacent Lands ......................................................... 158 PROPERTY ANALYSIS ...................................................................... 160 Recreational Resource Elements ....................................................... 160 Land Area .................................................................................. 160 Water Area ................................................................................. 161 Natural Scenery .......................................................................... 162 Significant Habitat ....................................................................... 162 Natural Features ......................................................................... 163 Archaeological and Historic Features .............................................. 164 Assessment of Use .......................................................................... 165 Past Uses ................................................................................... 165 Future Land Use and Zoning ......................................................... 166 Current Recreation Use and Visitor Programs .................................. 166 Other Uses ................................................................................. 168 Protected Zones .......................................................................... 168 Existing Facilities ............................................................................ 168 Wekiwa Springs State Park Recreation Facilities .............................. 168 Wekiwa Springs State Park Support Facilities .................................. 169 Rock Springs Run State Reserve Recreation Facilities ...................... 169 Rock Springs Run State Reserve Support Facilities .......................... 170 Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park Recreation Facilities ........... 170 Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park Support Facilities ............... 170 CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN ......................................................... 177 Potential Uses ................................................................................ 177 Public Access and Recreational Opportunities .................................. 177 Proposed Facilities .......................................................................... 180 Capital Facilities and Infrastructure ............................................... 180 Facilities Development ..................................................................... 184 Recreational Carrying Capacity ......................................................... 193 Optimum Boundary ......................................................................... 195 IMPLEMENTATION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT PROGRESS ................................................................ 203 Park Administration and Operations .................................................. 203 Resource Management .................................................................... 203 Natural Resources ....................................................................... 203 Cultural Resources ...................................................................... 204 Recreation and Visitor Services ......................................................... 204 Park Facilities ................................................................................. 205 MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION .......................................... 206 ii TABLES TABLE 1a – Wekiwa Springs State Park Management Zones ..................... 14 TABLE 1b – Rock Springs Run State Reserve Management Zones .............. 16 TABLE 1c – Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park Management Zones ... 18 TABLE 2 – Imperiled Species Inventory .................................................. 95 TABLE 3 – Inventory of FLEPPC Category I and II Exotic Plant Species ..... 104 TABLE 4 – Cultural Sites Listed in the Florida Master Site File ................. 121 TABLE 5 – Prescribed Fire Management ................................................ 132 TABLE 6 – Recreational Carrying Capacity ............................................ 194 TABLE 7 – Implementation Schedule and Cost Estimates................. 207-211 MAPS Vicinity Map ...........................................................................................3 Reference Map .......................................................................................5 Wekiwa Springs State Park Management Zones Map ................................. 21 Rock Springs Run State Reserve Management Zones Map ......................... 23 Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park Management Zones Map .............. 25 Wekiwa Springs State Park Soils Map ...................................................... 29 Rock Springs Run State Reserve Soils Map .............................................. 31 Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park Soils Map ................................... 33 Wekiwa Springs State Park Natural Communities Map ............................... 45 Rock Springs Run State Reserve Natural Communities Map ....................... 47 Lower Wekiva River Preserve State Park Natural Communities Map ............ 49 Wekiwa Springs State Park Desired Future Conditions Map ...................... 135 Rock Springs Run State Reserve
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Acridiidae of Minnesota
    Wqt 1lluitttr11ity nf :!alliuur11nta AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 141 TECHNICAL THE ACRIDIIDAE OF MINNESOTA BY M. P. SOMES DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY UNIVERSITY FARM, ST. PAUL. JULY 1914 THE UNIVERSlTY OF l\ll.'\1\ESOTA THE 130ARD OF REGENTS The Hon. B. F. :.JELsox, '\finneapolis, President of the Board - 1916 GEORGE EDGAR VINCENT, Minneapolis Ex Officio The President of the l.:niversity The Hon. ADOLPH 0. EBERHART, Mankato Ex Officio The Governor of the State The Hon. C. G. ScnuLZ, St. Paul l'.x Oflicio The Superintendent of Education The Hon. A. E. RICE, \Villmar 191.3 The Hon. CH.\RLES L. Sol\DfERS, St. Paul - 1915 The Hon. PIERCE Bun.ER, St. Paul 1916 The Hon. FRED B. SNYDER, Minneapolis 1916 The Hon. W. J. J\Lwo, Rochester 1919 The Hon. MILTON M. \NILLIAMS, Little Falls 1919 The Hon. }OIIN G. vVILLIAMS, Duluth 1920 The Hon. GEORGE H. PARTRIDGE, Minneapolis 1920 Tl-IE AGRICULTURAL C0:\1MITTEE The Hon. A. E. RrCE, Chairman The Hon. MILTON M. vVILLIAMS The Hon. C. G. SCHULZ President GEORGE E. VINCENT The Hon. JoHN G. \VrLLIAMS STATION STAFF A. F. VlooDs, M.A., D.Agr., Director J. 0. RANKIN, M.A.. Editor HARRIET 'vV. SEWALL, B.A., Librarian T. J. HORTON, Photographer T. L.' HAECKER, Dairy and Animal Husbandman M. H. REYNOLDS, B.S.A., M.D., D.V.:'d., Veterinarian ANDREW Boss, Agriculturist F. L. WASHBURN, M.A., Entomologist E. M. FREEMAN, Ph.D., Plant Pathologist and Botanist JonN T. STEWART, C.E., Agricultural Engineer R. W. THATCHER, M.A., Agricultural Chemist F. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Edge Effects Alter Ant-Guard Protection Against Herbivory
    Landscape Ecol (2013) 28:1743–1754 DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9917-6 RESEARCH ARTICLE Habitat edge effects alter ant-guard protection against herbivory Daniel M. Evans • Nash E. Turley • Joshua J. Tewksbury Received: 25 November 2012 / Accepted: 11 July 2013 / Published online: 20 July 2013 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Abstract Edge effects are among the most important plants far from edges, where herbivory pressure was drivers of species interactions in fragmented habitats, highest, despite the fact that aphids and ants were least but the impacts of edge effects on multitrophic abundant on these plants. Conversely, ants did not interactions are largely unknown. In this study we provide significant protection near edges, where assess edge effects on species interactions within an herbivory pressure was lowest and aphids and ants ant–plant mutualistic system—where ants protect were most abundant. We conclude that a strong edge plants against herbivory—to determine whether hab- effect on grasshopper abundance was a key factor itat edges alter the amount of protection ants provide. determining the amount of protection ants provided We focus on a single species of myrmecophytic plant, against herbivory. Future studies of the impacts of Solanum americanum, and experimentally manipulate habitat fragmentation on ant–plant mutualisms will ant access to study plants in large-scale fragmented benefit from studies of ant behavior in response to habitat patches at the Savannah River Site National herbivory threats, and studies of edge effects on other Environmental Research Park, USA. In this system, S. species interactions may also need to consider how americanum commonly hosts honeydew-producing species’ behavioral patterns influence the interactions aphids that are tended by ants, and grasshoppers are in question.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pentatomidae, Or Stink Bugs, of Kansas with a Key to Species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Richard J
    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Biology Faculty Papers Biology 2012 The eP ntatomidae, or Stink Bugs, of Kansas with a key to species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Richard J. Packauskas Fort Hays State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.fhsu.edu/biology_facpubs Part of the Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Packauskas, Richard J., "The eP ntatomidae, or Stink Bugs, of Kansas with a key to species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera)" (2012). Biology Faculty Papers. 2. http://scholars.fhsu.edu/biology_facpubs/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. 210 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 45, Nos. 3 - 4 The Pentatomidae, or Stink Bugs, of Kansas with a key to species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Richard J. Packauskas1 Abstract Forty eight species of Pentatomidae are listed as occurring in the state of Kansas, nine of these are new state records. A key to all species known from the state of Kansas is given, along with some notes on new state records. ____________________ The family Pentatomidae, comprised of mainly phytophagous and a few predaceous species, is one of the largest families of Heteroptera. Some of the phytophagous species have a wide host range and this ability may make them the most economically important family among the Heteroptera (Panizzi et al. 2000). As a group, they have been found feeding on cotton, nuts, fruits, veg- etables, legumes, and grain crops (McPherson 1982, McPherson and McPherson 2000, Panizzi et al 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Bagrada Hilaris Sage Thompson1, Morgan Pinkerton1, Eric Leveen2, Amanda C
    A Survey of Pest Management Practices in Crucifers of Florida and Bagrada hilaris Sage Thompson1, Morgan Pinkerton1, Eric LeVeen2, Amanda C. Hodges1 University of Florida, Department of Entomology and Nematology, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, 1991 SW 34th St, Gainesville, FL 32608 Abstract Methods Results The bagrada bug, Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Hemiptera: • An Institutional Review Board approved twenty question survey • 75% of participants indicated they did not recognize Bagrada Penatatomidae), is a key pest of the family Cruciferae that was was created and distributed online, in person, and by mail to hilaris (Figure 2). introduced to California in 2008 and has since spread to New growers of crucifers in Florida (Figure 2) • After seeing the pictures in the survey, 42% of participants Mexico, Nevada, and Arizona. Bagrada hilaris has been intercepted • The survey aimed to update our knowledge of pest management indicated they could distinguish B. hilaris and a look-alike, M. at Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services practices and the weed and insect pests growers are facing. histronica, in the field. interdiction stations 29 times from 2011-2015 and 319 times • After completing the survey, participants received an informative • The two most prolific weeds reported were Bermuda grass nationally (LeVeen). The purpose of the survey was to understand document about B. hilaris (Cynodon dactylon) and Virginia Pepperweed (Lepidium current pest management practices and scouting techniques (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in1041) virginicum) currently employed by Florida’s commercial and noncommercial • Of over 100 surveys distributed, 18 were collected and 15 were • 46% of the participants indicated they do not mow around growers of crucifers, if these practices are sufficient to identify and analyzed their fields – allowing weeds to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Protarctos Abstrusus
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A basal ursine bear (Protarctos abstrusus) from the Pliocene High Arctic reveals Eurasian afnities Received: 18 August 2017 Accepted: 24 November 2017 and a diet rich in fermentable Published: xx xx xxxx sugars Xiaoming Wang 1,2,3, Natalia Rybczynski4,5, C. Richard Harington4, Stuart C. White6 & Richard H. Tedford3 The skeletal remains of a small bear (Protarctos abstrusus) were collected at the Beaver Pond fossil site in the High Arctic (Ellesmere I., Nunavut). This mid-Pliocene deposit has also yielded 12 other mammals and the remains of a boreal-forest community. Phylogenetic analysis reveals this bear to be basal to modern bears. It appears to represent an immigration event from Asia, leaving no living North American descendants. The dentition shows only modest specialization for herbivory, consistent with its basal position within Ursinae. However, the appearance of dental caries suggest a diet high in fermentable- carbohydrates. Fossil plants remains, including diverse berries, suggests that, like modern northern black bears, P. abstrusus may have exploited a high-sugar diet in the fall to promote fat accumulation and facilitate hibernation. A tendency toward a sugar-rich diet appears to have arisen early in Ursinae, and may have played a role in allowing ursine lineages to occupy cold habitats. In 1970, Philip Bjork described a small fossil bear from the Pliocene Glenn’s Ferry Formation of southwestern Idaho. Based on a single m1 as the holotype, he was understandably perplexed and named it Ursus abstrusus. Additional material has not been forthcoming since its initial description and this bear has remained an enigma.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment (EA) Is Tiered to Other Environmental Documents That Are Available for Review at the Lake George Ranger District Office
    United States Department of Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service March, 2011 Hog Valley Scrub PALS No. 25932 Lake George Ranger District, Ocala National Forest Marion and Putnam Counties, Florida For Information Contact: Mike Herrin, District Ranger 17147 E. Hwy 40 Silver Springs, FL 34488 352-625-2520 [email protected] The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion. age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………. 2 Background ………………………………………………………………………………... 2 Purpose and Need for Action …………………………………………………………….... 2 Proposed Action ………………………………………………………………………….... 3 Decision Framework ………………………………………………………………………. 4 Public Involvement ………………………………………………………………………... 4 Issues ………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 ALTERNATIVES ………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Alternatives ………………………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Great Wildflowers for Dry Landscapes
    Great Wildflowers for Dry Landscapes Landscaping with Florida’s native wildflowers and plants provides refuge for birds, bees and butterflies while creating “habitat highways” through urban settings. / bob peterson (cc by 2.0) / bob peterson (cc by Many Florida landscapes have sandy soils that are naturally dry and well-drained, even after heavy rain. Instead of mulching or amending lantana involucrata these soils, embrace them and create a unique landscape by planting native wildflowers and grasses suited to dry conditions. Plan for Success Your palette of native plants should be made up of species naturally found in your Florida locale. Look for small- to Planting and Establishment medium-size shrubs, perennial wildflowers and grasses Many of Florida’s native plants and found in sandhills, flatwoods, dune systems and other xeric wildflowers do well in dry conditions. However, ecosystems. Consider bloom season and mature plant size they must be established properly to get off to a when choosing and placing plants. Plan to use wildflowers good start. Dig a hole twice the circumference as in groups of five to seven for visual impact and pollinator the pot. Loosen the plant’s roots and install it even attraction. with the ground. Water liberally and keep soil moist for two to three weeks. Gradually taper off Care watering to weekly for four to six weeks if there is no substantial rainfall. A light mulching with pine Prune ground-covering plants such as vines or low- straw can help reduce evapotranspiration and branching wildflowers as needed to keep them contained wilting. to the bed.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) in the New World, with a Species Checklist and Descriptions of Two New Genera and Species from Mexico and Martinique
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2019 KEYS TO ADULTS OF ALL GENERA AND LARVAE OF 19 SPECIES OF GYMNETINI (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE: CETONIINAE) IN THE NEW WORLD, WITH A SPECIES CHECKLIST AND DESCRIPTIONS OF TWO NEW GENERA AND SPECIES FROM MEXICO AND MARTINIQUE Brett C. Ratcliffe Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 73(1): 1–26. 2019. KEYS TO ADULTS OF ALL GENERA AND LARVAE OF 19 SPECIES OF GYMNETINI (COLEOPTERA:SCARABAEIDAE:CETONIINAE) IN THE NEW WORLD, WITH A SPECIES CHECKLIST AND DESCRIPTIONS OF TWO NEW GENERA AND SPECIES FROM MEXICO AND MARTINIQUE BRETT C. RATCLIFFE Systematics Research Collections, University of Nebraska State Museum W-436 Nebraska Hall, University of Nebraska Lincoln, NE 68588-0514, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT Keys to adults of all 27 genera and larvae of 19 species in 10 genera of Gymnetini that occur in the New World are presented. Supplementing the key to adults is a checklist of all species, their synonyms, and all literature citations associated with the nomenclatural epithets. Two new genera, Gymnephoria Ratcliffe and Madiana Ratcliffe and Rom´e,with one new species each, are described from Mexico and Martinique, respectively. Key Words: flower chafers, taxonomy, new species, identification, nomenclature, synonyms DOI.org/10.1649/0010-065X-73.1.1 Zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DABCC591-6424-4546-A8D0-32B5DE6B69AA Our generation is the first to fully appreciate the key is provided for 19 species in 10 genera of the threats facing millions of species, known New World larval Gymnetini.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Instituto Tecnológico De Cd. Victoria División De Estudios De Posgrado E Investigación
    SUBSECRETARÍA DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR TECNOLÓGICA INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE CD.VICTORIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- U n a P u b l i c a c i ó n d e l I n s t i t u t o T e c n o l ó g i c o d e C d. V i c t o r i a Volumen 10 No.1 Abril 2013 ISSN 1665-983X CIENCIAS EXACTAS Y NATURALES Tabla de vida de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemíptera: Psyllidae) de la región centro del estado de Tamaulipas, México. C. H. Lugo-Garza, C. A. Salazar-Olivo & O. J. González-Gaona……….…………................1 Estudio preliminar de productividad vegetal estacional en diversos ecosistemas de agostadero en el estado de Tamaulipas, México. Y. A. García-Carbonell, A. Mora-Olivo, A. Moreno-Valdez & O. S. Escamilla- Gallegos…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…7 Nivel de preferencia de plantas en Alta Cimas (Reserva de la Biosfera El Cielo), Tamaulipas, México. S. G. Medellín-Morales, L. Barrientos-Lozano, S. Del Amo-Rodríguez, P. Almaguer-Sierra & C. S. Venegas- Barrera…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..12 Degradación física del suelo por actividades antrópicas en la Zona II de la Cuenca de Burgos, Tamaulipas, México. F. Arias-Miño, M. Espinosa-Ramírez, E. Andrade-Limas, B. Castro-Meza, F. Briones- Encinia & W. Salinas-Castillo………………………………………………………………………………..……….…….25 Contribución al conocimiento de la fauna Orthoptera (Insecta) en la “Sierra de Tamaulipas”, México. L. Barrientos-Lozano, J.B. Ramírez-Núñez, A.Y. Rocha-Sánchez, J.V. Horta-Vega & P. Almaguer-Sierra….…..32 INGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍA Fórmulas para el cálculo de deflexiones en armaduras isostáticas de cuerdas paralelas.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site a Report to the U
    Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site A report to the U. S. Army and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. J. Michels, Jr., J. L. Newton, H. L. Lindon, and J. A. Brazille Texas AgriLife Research 2301 Experiment Station Road Bushland, TX 79012 2008 Report Introductory Notes The invertebrate survey in 2008 presented an interesting challenge. Extremely dry conditions prevailed throughout most of the adult activity period for the invertebrates and grass fires occurred several times throughout the summer. By visual assessment, plant resources were scarce compared to last year, with few green plants and almost no flowering plants. Eight habitats and nine sites continued to be sampled in 2008. The Ponderosa pine/ yellow indiangrass site was removed from the study after the low numbers of species and individuals collected there in 2007. All other sites from the 2007 survey were included in the 2008 survey. We also discontinued the collection of Coccinellidae in the 2008 survey, as only 98 individuals from four species were collected in 2007. Pitfall and malaise trapping were continued in the same way as the 2007 survey. Sweep net sampling was discontinued to allow time for Asilidae and Orthoptera timed surveys consisting of direct collection of individuals with a net. These surveys were conducted in the same way as the time constrained butterfly (Papilionidea and Hesperoidea) surveys, with 15-minute intervals for each taxanomic group. This was sucessful when individuals were present, but the dry summer made it difficult to assess the utility of these techniques because of overall low abundance of insects.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]