Systematic Entomology Laboratory. PSI, Agricultural Research Service

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Systematic Entomology Laboratory. PSI, Agricultural Research Service PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH 99(4). 1997. pp 693- 696 BIOLOGICAL NOTES ON SPARASION LATREILLE (HYMENOPTERA: SCELIONIDAE), AN EGG PARASITOID OF ATLANTICUS GIBBOSUS SCUDDER (ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONII DA E) E. E. GRISSELL Systematic Entomology Laboratory. PSI, Agricultural Research Service. U.S. Depart­ ment of Agriculture, c/o National Museum of Natural History. MRC 168, Washington. DC 20560 U.S.A. Abstract.—The first behavioral observations for any species of Sparasion and the first report of the genus Atlanticus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) as a host of Sparasion are pre­ sented. In Florida, a number of female wasps were observed burrowing headfirst into sandy areas. In every instance where a female burrowed into sand and the area subse­ quently was excavated, an egg of Atlanticus, oriented vertically, was found at 12 to 15 mm beneath the surface. Females emerged headfirst from the sand if they remained un­ derground for more than a few minutes. A single female was excavated from the ground while in the process of ovipositing into an egg; she was at its uppermost end with her head oriented toward the surface. Key Words: Hymenoptera, Scelionidae. Sparasion, Tettigoniidae, Atlanticus gibbosus, egg. parasitoid The genus Sparasion Latreille is repre­ except the host record itself (Cowan 1929) sented by over 100 species throughout the and subsequent citations of this record Hoi arctic and Oriental regions (Johnson (Milts 1941. Hitchcock 1942. Wakeland 1992). eight of which occur in America 1959, Muesebeck 1979). Although a few north of Mexico (Muesebeck 1979). Essen­ additional papers refer to Sparasion in re­ tially nothing is known about the biology lation to a potential host, these were merely or behavior of these wasps. Kozlov and Ko- specimens of Sparasion collected in a hab­ nonova (1990) recently described over 50 itat relative to the potential host. For ex­ new species of Sparasion, and not a single ample. Spencer (1958) reported Sparasion one had been reared. The paucity of bio­ sp. "probably parasitic upon eggs of the tet- logical or behavioral data for species in this tigoniid Anabrus longipes Caudell," and genus is doubly remarkable because it has Thorens (1991) collected Sparasion sp. in been recognized for nearly 200 years (de­ a locality containing an acridid grasshopper scribed in 1802), and its single known host {Chortbippus sp.). in the Americas is the Mormon cricket, An- In this paper I present anecdotal obser­ abrus simplex Haldeman, an insect of leg­ vations made on the behavior of an unde- endary stature in the United States. Sur­ scribed species of Sparasion in Florida that prisingly, even for this common, well- attacks eggs of Atlanticus gibbosus Scudder known host, no truly biological or behav­ (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). This is the first ioral observations have been published for report of Atlanticus as a host for Sparasion. its parasite, Sparasion pilosum Ashmead, These observations were made in 1974 and 694 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 1975 and were to form the basis of more Field recognition of this species requires detailed studies to follow. Other obligations experience based upon preserved speci­ prevented further investigation, however, mens. The wasps are ca. 5 mm in length, and as no one has published biological in­ appear black in color, and are most easily formation for the genus in the intervening seen as they fly or walk back and forth over twenty years, my notes provide enough data a small area of soil. Females are distin­ to highlight significant aspects of the here­ guished from males by the orange legs tofore unknown behavior of a species of (black in males) and short, hidden antennae Sparasion. (elongate and easily seen in males). Determination of Atlanticus gibbosus METHODS was made by D. A. Nickle, who compared I made observations in two areas about dried eggs excavated from the Alachua site 16 km apart in Alachua County, Florida. In (21 July 1975) with eggs dissected from both areas the soil consisted of sand, which dried adult female Atlanticus in the collec­ in the absence of rain, was loose and pow­ tion of the National Museum of Natural dery dry for the top 1 or 2 cm. History. Atlanticus gibbosus is the only Alachua (0.5 km southeast). This site common shield-backed grasshopper found was a large, sandy, disturbed area formed in Florida and is particularly abundant dur­ by the intersection of a railroad track and ing the summer months when my obser­ several dirt roads. The entire area had been vations were made. bulldozed through a low hillock in recent times, probably as a barrow pit. A number OBSERVATIONS of annual and perennial plants, most nota­ Alachua. 21 to 27 July 1974. -On 21 bly Cassia sp. (Fabaceae), were returning July I arrived at the site at 10:45 am and to the site. saw several female Sparasion flying slowly Gainesville (grounds of the Florida State over a small sandy area at about 2 to 5 cm Collection of Arthropods, Division of Plant above the surface. Two to 5 wasps were Industry building). This site was an un- seen walking or flying in any given area paved road that had been cut through the (approximately 30 cm2 to I ur). Once a fe­ woods around the back side of the DPI male landed on the ground she walked building. The site has been paved in the in­ about erratically over the surface with her tervening years since observations were abdomen bobbing slightly up and down, first made. wings folded and held horizontally over the Determination of the status of this Spa­ abdomen. The antennae were extended rasion as undescribed was made first by the downward in an inverted V-shaped pattern late C. F. W. Muesebeck and subsequently just above the surface. When a female was confirmed by Lubomir Masner, Agri­ found an area of interest, she touched her culture Canada. Additionally, I have com­ antennae on the sand and vibrated them; pared the species with types and other spec­ then she would plunge headfirst into the imens in the National Museum of Natural sand. As she entered, she rotated her body History. Smithsonian Institution, and it ap­ from side to side, and her antennae ap­ pears to differ from all available material. peared to play some role in excavation, but Currently no systematist in authority is this could not be confirmed. In most cases willing to describe the taxon. All voucher her body would quickly disappear beneath specimens collected in this study are the surface, and just as quickly she would housed in the Florida State Collection of back out completely and begin the probing Arthropods, Gainesville, Florida, along activity in nearby areas. Females did not with large series of material representing come out headfirst unless they had been un­ the same taxon. derground at least several minutes. VOLUME 99, NUMBER 4 695 In one instance I saw a female emerging on Cassia. The area was extremely wet. and headfirst from the sand. I excavated at the no females were seen. It rained heavily for point of emergence and found a tettigoniid the next few days as well, and I abandoned egg ca. 6 mm in length at 13 mm below the site. the surface (top of egg at 13 mm). A few Gainesville. 2 July 1975 —At 10:45 am. minutes later I saw a female wasp burrow along the edge of a sandy road, I observed headfirst into the sand. It took 40 to 50 sec­ a female burrow headfirst into nearly level, onds for her to completely disappear from loose, dry sand. In 10 minutes a female sight. Five minutes later she emerged head­ (presumed to be the same, but perhaps in­ first from the soil. Then almost immediately correctly, see below) emerged headfirst another female burrowed headfirst into the from the sand about 3 mm from where she sand in the same area. After 8 minutes I entered. Her body was covered with dust, excavated the soil and found the female and she spent several minutes cleaning her near an egg. The top of this egg was 10 abdomen and then her head. Then she mm beneath the surface. The egg was 6 mm walked away. I immediately excavated the in length. Shortly thereafter I saw another sand beginning about 10 cm away from the female burrow headfirst into the ground and emergence site. I excavated to a depth of completely disappear in ca. 45 seconds. Af­ 20 mm (the first 15 mm were dry, then be­ ter waiting 17 minutes for her to emerge. 1 came damp). At 15 mm in depth and near excavated the sand and found an egg. The where the female emerged. I found two female wasp was oriented head upwards, eggs of a tettigoniid a few cm apart. These above the tip of the egg. with her ovipositor were about 5 mm in length and placed ver­ embedded into it. When I removed the egg, tically in the moist sand with the tops at the the wasp was still attached to it. but she 15 mm level. I also found three female broke free and flew away. This egg was 12 Sparasion, heads upright, near these two mm below the surface and was 6 mm long. eggs but not in contact with them. These I placed the above eggs in gelatin capsules, females either walked or flew away quickly but nothing emerged from them. as the sand fell away from their bodies dur­ On 23 July I visited the same site from ing my excavation. I brought the eggs into 9:30 to 11:30 am and saw numerous males the lab and placed them in gelatin capsules, flying above the sand; some alighted on the but nothing emerged.
Recommended publications
  • Phylogeny of Ensifera (Hexapoda: Orthoptera) Using Three Ribosomal Loci, with Implications for the Evolution of Acoustic Communication
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38 (2006) 510–530 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of Ensifera (Hexapoda: Orthoptera) using three ribosomal loci, with implications for the evolution of acoustic communication M.C. Jost a,*, K.L. Shaw b a Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, USA b Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA Received 9 May 2005; revised 27 September 2005; accepted 4 October 2005 Available online 16 November 2005 Abstract Representatives of the Orthopteran suborder Ensifera (crickets, katydids, and related insects) are well known for acoustic signals pro- duced in the contexts of courtship and mate recognition. We present a phylogenetic estimate of Ensifera for a sample of 51 taxonomically diverse exemplars, using sequences from 18S, 28S, and 16S rRNA. The results support a monophyletic Ensifera, monophyly of most ensiferan families, and the superfamily Gryllacridoidea which would include Stenopelmatidae, Anostostomatidae, Gryllacrididae, and Lezina. Schizodactylidae was recovered as the sister lineage to Grylloidea, and both Rhaphidophoridae and Tettigoniidae were found to be more closely related to Grylloidea than has been suggested by prior studies. The ambidextrously stridulating haglid Cyphoderris was found to be basal (or sister) to a clade that contains both Grylloidea and Tettigoniidae. Tree comparison tests with the concatenated molecular data found our phylogeny to be significantly better at explaining our data than three recent phylogenetic hypotheses based on morphological characters. A high degree of conflict exists between the molecular and morphological data, possibly indicating that much homoplasy is present in Ensifera, particularly in acoustic structures. In contrast to prior evolutionary hypotheses based on most parsi- monious ancestral state reconstructions, we propose that tegminal stridulation and tibial tympana are ancestral to Ensifera and were lost multiple times, especially within the Gryllidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus) photo by Clifton Avery Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park
    Wekiva River Basin State Parks Approved Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 7 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 9 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 9 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................. 10 Public Participation ............................................................................ 10 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 13 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 19 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 19 Topography .................................................................................. 19 Geology ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Sensorfusion for the Classification of Bioacoustic Time
    Abteilung Neuroinformatik Prof. Dr. Gunther¨ Palm Temporal Sensorfusion for the Classification of Bioacoustic Time Series Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Informatik der Universitat¨ Ulm von Christian R. Dietrich aus Hirschegg 2003 ii Amtierender Dekan: Prof. Dr. Friedrich W. von Henke Erster Gutachter Prof. Dr. Gunther¨ Palm Zweiter Gutachter PD Dr. Alfred Strey Tag der Promotion 25.06.04 Abstract Classifying species by their sounds is a fundamental challenge in the study of animal vocalisations. Most of existing studies are based on manual inspection and labelling of acoustic features, e.g. amplitude signals and sound spectra, which relies on the agreement between human experts. But during the last ten years, systems for the automated classification of ani- mal vocalisations have been developed. In this thesis a system for the classification of Orthoptera species by their sounds is described in great detail and the behaviour of this approach is demonstrated on a large data set containing sounds of 53 different species. The system consists of multiple classifiers, since in previous studies it has been shown, that for many applications the classification performance of a single classifier system can be improved by combining the decisions of multiple classifiers. To determine features for the individual classifiers these features have been selected manually and automatically. For the manual feature selec- tion, pattern recognition and bioacoustics are considered as two coher- ent interdisciplinary research fields. Hereby the sound production mecha- nisms of the Orthoptera reveals significant features for the classification to family and to species level. Nevertheless, we applied a wrapper feature selection method, the sequential forward selection, in order to determine further discriminative feature sets for the individual classifiers.
    [Show full text]
  • New Canadian and Ontario Orthopteroid Records, and an Updated Checklist of the Orthoptera of Ontario
    Checklist of Ontario Orthoptera (cont.) JESO Volume 145, 2014 NEW CANADIAN AND ONTARIO ORTHOPTEROID RECORDS, AND AN UPDATED CHECKLIST OF THE ORTHOPTERA OF ONTARIO S. M. PAIERO1* AND S. A. MARSHALL1 1School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1 email, [email protected] Abstract J. ent. Soc. Ont. 145: 61–76 The following seven orthopteroid taxa are recorded from Canada for the first time: Anaxipha species 1, Cyrtoxipha gundlachi Saussure, Chloroscirtus forcipatus (Brunner von Wattenwyl), Neoconocephalus exiliscanorus (Davis), Camptonotus carolinensis (Gerstaeker), Scapteriscus borellii Linnaeus, and Melanoplus punctulatus griseus (Thomas). One further species, Neoconocephalus retusus (Scudder) is recorded from Ontario for the first time. An updated checklist of the orthopteroids of Ontario is provided, along with notes on changes in nomenclature. Published December 2014 Introduction Vickery and Kevan (1985) and Vickery and Scudder (1987) reviewed and listed the orthopteroid species known from Canada and Alaska, including 141 species from Ontario. A further 15 species have been recorded from Ontario since then (Skevington et al. 2001, Marshall et al. 2004, Paiero et al. 2010) and we here add another eight species or subspecies, of which seven are also new Canadian records. Notes on several significant provincial range extensions also are given, including two species originally recorded from Ontario on bugguide.net. Voucher specimens examined here are deposited in the University of Guelph Insect Collection (DEBU), unless otherwise noted. New Canadian records Anaxipha species 1 (Figs 1, 2) (Gryllidae: Trigidoniinae) This species, similar in appearance to the Florida endemic Anaxipha calusa * Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Feeding Behavior of Atlanticus Testaceus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 4 Number 2 -- Summer 1971 Number 2 -- Summer Article 8 1971 July 2017 Notes on Feeding Behavior of Atlanticus Testaceus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Gary V. Manley Michigan State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Manley, Gary V. 2017. "Notes on Feeding Behavior of Atlanticus Testaceus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 4 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol4/iss2/8 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Manley: Notes on Feeding Behavior of Atlanticus Testaceus (Orthoptera: Te 1971 THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGIST NOTES ON FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF ATLANTICUS TESTACEUS1 (ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONI I DAE) Gary V. Manley Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48823 INTRODUCTION The Biology and Feeding behavior of Atlanticus testaceus (scudder) has received considerable attention by Gangwere (1966, 1967). While studying summer feeding of the adult Atlanticus testaceus in a Northern Michigan Jack Pine forest on the seeds of Melampyrum lineare Desr. (Scrophulariaceae), some new observations which supplement published information were made by the author. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult males and females were hand collected from the forest floor between the hours of 10:OO PM and 12:OO midnight during the months of August and early September. They were placed in plastic containers overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Ensifera (Orthopera)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 9 Number 1 - Spring 1976 Number 1 - Spring 1976 Article 2 April 1976 Indiana Ensifera (Orthopera) W. P. McCafferty J. L. Stein Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation McCafferty, W. P. and Stein, J. L. 1976. "Indiana Ensifera (Orthopera)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 9 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol9/iss1/2 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. McCafferty and Stein: Indiana Ensifera (Orthopera) INDIANA ENSIFERA (ORTHOPERA) and J. L. Stein Department of Entomology Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Published by ValpoScholar, 1976 1 The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 9, No. 1 [1976], Art. 2 https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol9/iss1/2 2 McCafferty and Stein: Indiana Ensifera (Orthopera) THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST INDIANA ENSIFERA (ORTHOPERA)' W. P. McCafferty and J. L. Stein2 A total of 67 species of long-horned grasshoppers and crickets were reported to occur in Indiana by Blatchley (1903) in his "Orthoptera of Indiana." Distributional information concerning thek species was sparse and has not been significantly supplemented since that time. Subsequent works which have dealt either heavily or exclusively with the Indiana fauna include Fox (1915), Blatchley (1920), Cantrall and Young (1954), and Young and Cantrall(1956).
    [Show full text]
  • The Behavior of Atlanticus Testaceus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) on the E.S
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 1 Number 3 -- December 1966 Number 3 -- Article 5 December 1966 December 1966 The Behavior of Atlanticus Testaceus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) on the E.S. George Reserve, Michigan S. K. Gangwere Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gangwere, S. K. 1966. "The Behavior of Atlanticus Testaceus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) on the E.S. George Reserve, Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 1 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol1/iss3/5 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Gangwere: The Behavior of Atlanticus Testaceus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) 1966 THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGIST 95 THE BEHAVIOR OF ATLANTICUS TESTACEUS (ORTHOPTERA: S. K. Gangwere Department of Biology, Wayne State University Several reports deal in part with the systematics, distribution, or habits of one or another of the shield-backedkatydids of the orthopteran genus Atlanticus. Included are Blatchley (1920), C antrall (1943),C audell (1907), Davis (1893), Hebard (1934), McNeill (1891), Rehn and Hebard (1916), and Scudder (1894). One species of the genus, A. testaceus (Scudder), is found commonly throughout Michigan and has interesting habits. As the species' feeding behavior was poorly understood, the author undertook an investigation dealing with that subject. The results are in press. During the course of that study much information was obtained on certain non-feeding aspects of the species' behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Endnotes
    Chapter Endnotes Preface 1 Peck RM & Stroud PT (2012) A Glorious Enterprise: The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and the Making of American Science (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia). 2 Meyers ARW ed. (2011) Knowing Nature: Art and Science in Philadelphia, 1740–1840 (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT). 3 http://www.ansp.org/research/systematics-evolution/collections. 4 http://phillyhistory.org/PhotoArchive/. Introduction 1 Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation (2013) State of Center City 2013 (Philadelphia, PA), http://www.centercityphila.org/docs/SOCC2013.pdf. 2 United States Census Bureau (2012) Top 20 Cities, 1790–2010, http://www.census.gov/dataviz/visualiza- tions/007/508.php. 3 United States Census Bureau (2013) State & County QuickFacts. Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, http:// quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/42/42101.html; United States Census Bureau (2013) State & County QuickFacts. Boston (city), Massachusetts, http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/25/2507000.html; United States Census Bureau (2013) State & County QuickFacts. New York (city,) New York, http://quickfacts. census.gov/qfd/states/36/3651000.html; United States Census Bureau (2013) State & County QuickFacts. Baltimore City, Maryland, http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/24/24510.html; United States Census Bureau (2013) State and County QuickFacts. District of Columbia, http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/ states/11000.html. 4 F orman RTT (2008) Urban Regions: Ecology and Planning beyond the City (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK). 5 Clemants SE & Moore G (2003) Patterns of species richness in eight northeastern United States cities. Urban Habitats 1(1):4–16, http://www.urbanhabitats.org/v01n01/speciesdiversity_pdf.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
    THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Research.Pdf (1.406Mb)
    INVESTIGATING AN ADAPTIVE RADIATION IN TEMPERATE NEOCONOCEPHALUS _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by Katherine H. Frederick Dr. Johannes Schul, Dissertation Supervisor JULY 2013 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled INVESTIGATING AN ADAPTIVE RADIATION IN TEMPERATE NEOCONOCEPHALUS Presented by Katherine H. Frederick, A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Johannes Schul Professor Sarah L. Bush Professor Lori Eggert Professor Richard Houseman Professor J. Chris Pires ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge all past and present Schul lab members, as well as all of the scientists that have contributed to the field of knowledge of Necoconocephalus acoustic communication; the time and effort of each of them contributed a data point or many points for use in comparative methods. I would like to thank Katie Kilmer, Oli Beckers, Gideon Ney, Nathan Thompson, and Megan Murphy for their help collecting specimens. I would like to thank Rob Snyder for his guidance in sequencing and tree building. Finally, I would like to thank Kate Hertweck, Roxi Kellar and Corey Hudson for their help with data analysis and discussions of evolutionary theory. Most importantly I would like to thank Johannes Schul and Sarah Bush. The Schul lab environment allowed me to bring knowledge and ideas from my previous studies and build on it in ways I never could have predicted.
    [Show full text]