DOCSLIB.ORG

Newsletter No. 70

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Newsletter No. 70 Newsletter Winter 2006 No. 70 Commission Internationale de Microflore du Paléozoïque CIMP homepage: President: John Marshall http://www.cimp.ulg.ac.be Past President: Florentin Paris Secretary General & Newsletter Editor: Mike Stephenson Treasurer: Philippe Steemans Webmaster: Philippe Steemans I.F.P.S. representatives: Thomas Servais, Ken Higgs Contents Opinion: How do we sell Deep Time? ............................................................................. 2 New President’s message .................................................................................................. 4 Palynos News ..................................................................................................................... 4 Meetings and conferences................................................................................................. 5 CIMP Prague.....................................................................................................................9 CIMP General Meeting minutes.................................................................................... 58 Election of President of CIMP ....................................................................................... 59 New subcommission positions in CIMP ........................................................................ 59 Next CIMP Conference: Cracow 2010?........................................................................ 59 Gallery of Prague photos................................................................................................ 59 Post CIMP Field trip....................................................................................................... 61 Letter from Jiri Bek........................................................................................................ 62 Enigmatic Givetian palynomorphs................................................................................ 64 Taxonomy online ............................................................................................................. 65 PalyWeb ........................................................................................................................... 66 New address .....................................................................................................................67 More contributions ......................................................................................................... 67 Treasurer’s Report CIMP Finances.............................................................................. 68 Participants at Prague. ................................................................................................... 68 CIMP Newsletter Winter 2006 totally unlike that of the Quaternary, Opinion: How do we sell Deep the kind of atmosphere only found in Time? Deep Time. The ice -core record, Mike Stephenson, [email protected] which has enabled reconstruction of atmospheric CO2 at high resolution, The Palaeozoic - the era with which shows that we are, today, at the highest CIMP is primarily concerned - is Deep level of CO2 in the last 420,000 years Time. The phrase Deep Time, meaning and likely higher than any point in the pre-Quaternary time, is turning up a lot last 20,000,000 yrs (IPCC, 2001). CO2 recently. Within the British and is a particularly compelling reason to American geological communities study Deep Time, owing to its questions such as ‘How do we sell relevance to climate change on all Deep Time’ and ‘What is the point of timescales (Crowley and Berner, studying Deep Time?’ are continually 2001). Deep pre-Quaternary time is being asked (e.g. Soreghan et al. 2003, also more than 99% of earth time and Soreghan 2004). I am presently contains most of the big events that involved in organising a symposium at have shaped life and this planet. BGS on the ‘Geological Survey and According to some estimates, rates of Climate Change’, and at least two extinction recorded in the last 50 years delegates have suggested privately to are higher than those at the Permian– me that Deep Time research should not Triassic boundary (PTB). be included because its conclusions are too vague and its data cannot be used easily in climate models because it is too ‘coarse’. They say that Deep Time research cannot contribute to understanding decadal or centennial climate change which is, after all, what governments are mainly interested in. Thus as Palaeozoic palynologists we ought to be ‘selling’ Deep Time, and thinking about the specific benefits that The Monteverde Golden toad was last seen in our period of study (which contains 1989 and is presumed extinct. 33% of toad two major glacial events) and our species are endangered and 120 species have science (which is arguably the only become extinct since the 1980s. For the first palaeontological discipline that can time fungal disease linked to global warming has been suggested as the cause (see Nature provide high enough resolution data in 439, 161-167). the Palaeozoic) can offer. So are we heading for mass extinction It’s true that the Quaternary has told us and is the study of Quaternary climate a lot about the Earth’s climate system. variability enough to understand the Perhaps the most significant and extremes that might be coming? These surprising is that climate can change ideas alone suggest that deep time is quickly, within human lifetimes, and worthy of interest. But deep time study that this record can be preserved at could answer many more questions: high fidelity in ice cores for example. Can ‘tipping points’ of climate change, However, study of the Quaternary e.g. from greenhouse to icehouse, be alone gives a rather myopic view of predicted? How do tectonics influence our climatic past; a view that we must climate in affecting gateways, relief, look beyond, because we are now and the ocean thermohaline entering an atmospheric composition circulation? (see for example Soreghan 2 CIMP Newsletter Winter 2006 et al. 2003). Palaeozoic palynologists other proxies (geochemical, isotopic) have been involved in posing some of in supporting the palynological data these questions and could be and develop a hypothesis of change fundamental in future research, if we which we test most crucially by build on our strengths in corroboration from study of correlated biostratigraphy and sections elsewhere, involving palaeobiogeography and work with biostratigraphy and geochronology. isotope geochemists and Thus palynology is used in the geochronologists. reconstruction of climate change (using its value as a proxy) as well as being important in correlating sections recording change. CIMP palynologists have been involved in this kind of science with particularly strong contributions in the early Palaeozoic, though new palynological work is showing the value of study of the Carboniferous-Permian glacial period in understanding modern glaciation. Computer climate modellers study Deep time: the horizontal Permian Saiq climate by synthesising and Formation above the Precambrian Fiq Formation, Saiq Plateau, Oman. manipulating key processes then viewing the results, whereas palynologists and stratigraphers view the results then deduce the processes. Thus there is a difference in the approach of climate modelers and the palaeontology/stratigraphy community. This historical disparity between the communities should be bridged because we can learn a lot from each other. However neither geologists nor deep time computer climate modellers can resolve questions on decadal or centennial level climate change but we can see the big events in the earth system and distinguish large and important events from small events. New projects that interest me and which might grow from work presently being done at BGS include the role of phytoplankton in controlling ρCO in Looking down on the Fiq Formation, Saiq 2 Plateau, Oman. Lower Palaeozoic to the right, glacial cycles, and the value of new all capped by Permian Saiq Formation. climate proxies such as geologically preserved lignin when studied in Most geological deep time concert with detailed terrestrial palynological research begins with a palynology. But it’s our responsibility rock section which records as palynologists to ensure that the environmental change. We study its evidence of our science is heard, and palynology, then we assess the value of 3 CIMP Newsletter Winter 2006 that the value of the Palaeozoic in that in Cork, Ireland in 2001. But it has climate study is known. now broadened out to be a joint References meeting with the Acritarch Sub- commission. We have, to my Soreghan, G. S. 2004. Deja-vu all over knowledge, never before had a meeting again: Deep Time (climate) is here to in Portugal. Palaeozoic palynology is a stay. Palaois, 19, February 2004. young subject in Portugal and it has Soreghan, G. S., Parrish, J. T. & helped very significantly to understand Maples, C. G. 2003. Geoclimate: the mineral deposits in southern Spain probing the Earth’s climate record at and Portugal. So it is a great all temporal and spatial scales. opportunity to see what they have Eos,Vol. 84, No. 44, 4 November achieved. The details are elsewhere in 2003. this Newsletter. IPCC, 2001, Climate Change 2001, I have also been giving thought to how The Scientific Basis: Cambridge we can better use CIMP as a way of University Press, Cambridge, 881 p. establishing the future of Palaeozoic palynology. CIMP is quite unusual in Crowley, J.C., and Berner, R.A., 2001, that it has very few assets apart from CO2 and climate changes: Science, v. the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Strategic and Structural Evolution of the Talladega Slate Belt, Alabama Appalachians
    fl d029-08 1st pgs page 1 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 29 2012 Overview of the stratigraphic and structural evolution of the Talladega slate belt, Alabama Appalachians James F. Tull* Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University Clinton I. Barineau* Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Columbus State University ABSTRACT The allochthonous Talladega belt of eastern-northeastern Alabama and north- western Georgia is a northeast striking, fault bounded block of lower greenschist facies metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks that formed along the margin of Lau- rentia at or outboard of the seaward edge of the Alabama promontory. Bounded by metamorphic rocks of the higher grade Neoproterozoic(?) to Carboniferous eastern Blue Ridge on the southeast and unmetamorphosed to anchimetamorphic Paleozoic rocks of the Appalachian foreland on the northwest, the Talladega belt includes shelf facies rocks of the latest Neoproterozoic/earliest Cambrian Kahatchee Mountain Group, Cambrian-Ordovician Sylacauga Marble Group, and the latest Silurian(?) to uppermost Devonian/earliest Mississippian Talladega Group. Along the southeast- ern fl ank of these metasedimentary sequences, a Middle Ordovician back-arc terrane (Hillabee Greenstone) was tectonically emplaced along a cryptic pre-metamorphic thrust fault (Hillabee thrust) and subsequently dismembered with units of the upper Talladega Group along the post-metamorphic Hollins Line fault system. Importantly, strata within the Talladega belt are critical for understanding the tectonic evolution of the southern Appalachian orogen when coupled with the geologic history of adjacent terranes. Rocks of the lower Talladega Group, the Lay Dam Formation, suggest latest Silurian-earliest Devonian tectonism that is only now being recognized in other areas of the southern Appalachians.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithofacies and Paleogeography of the Conasauga Group, (Middle and Late Cambrian) in the Valley and Ridge Province of East Tennessee
    Lithofacies and paleogeography of the Conasauga Group, (Middle and Late Cambrian) in the Valley and Ridge province of east Tennessee KENNETH O. HASSON Department of Geography/Geology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614, and Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 C. STEPHEN HAASE Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 ABSTRACT A sub-basin within the regional intrashelf basin has been identi- fied. The axis of this sub-basin is oriented northwest, perpendicular to A comprehensive data base for the Conasauga Group (Middle the regional trend of the shelf and Appalachian structure. Approxi- and Late Cambrian) throughout the Valley and Ridge province in east mately 2,900 ft (883 m) of Conasauga strata accumulated in the sub- Tennessee was compiled from published and unpublished sources. basin, which first appeared during Pumpkin Valley Shale deposition Lithofacies and isopach maps and stratigraphic cross sections were and persisted through Maynardville Limestone deposition. We inter- constructed from this data base on both present-day and palinspastic pret the abrupt thickening at the margin of this basin to result from bases to define regional depositional patterns of the Conasauga basement faulting, which produced a graben that subsided intermit- Group. tently during basin filling. This structure may have economic signifi- Isopach and lithofacies trends recognized on present-day base cance in that there is an apparent correlation between the margin of maps are generally consistent with those previously recognized. Litho- this second-order basin and zinc mineralization in overlying carbon- facies data are consistent with a shelf-intrashelf-basin-carbonate- ates of the Knox Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Seismic Lines Across the Rome Trough and Allegheny Plateau of Northern West Virginia, Western Maryland, and Southwestern Pennsylvania
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I–2791 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REGIONAL SEISMIC LINES ACROSS THE ROME TROUGH AND ALLEGHENY PLATEAU OF NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA, WESTERN MARYLAND, AND SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA By Christopher S. Kulander 1 and Robert T. Ryder 2 INTRODUCTION having thin-skinned structures with greater tectonic shortening. These provinces meet at a physiographic and structural boundary The study area for this investigation is the central Appalachian called the Allegheny structural front. The Rome trough, a north­ basin (see index map below). The northern West Virginia, west­ east-trending graben that involves basement, underlies the ern Maryland, and southwestern Pennsylvania parts of the cen­ Allegheny Plateau (fig. 2). Commonly, basement rocks in the tral Appalachian basin consist of complex structural geometries Rome trough are buried beneath at least 20,000 feet (ft) of and a thick Paleozoic sequence. Here, the basin coincides with Paleozoic strata (Shumaker, 1996). Little has been published that is related to the deep structure of 80˚ the Rome trough in northern West Virginia, western Maryland, and southwestern Pennsylvania. Wells drilled to basement are absent here and most of the multi-fold seismic data are propri­ etary. Although Ryder (1991) and Ryder and others (1992) con­ NY structed several detailed stratigraphic cross sections of Cambrian and Ordovician strata across parts of the Rome trough and Shumaker (1996) mapped basement structure along the entire PA NJ 40˚ Rome trough from central Kentucky to northeastern Pennsylvania, few interpreted, regional seismic-based geologic OH MD DE cross sections have been published in this area. The objective of this investigation is to interpret the structure and stratigraphy of 40˚ WV the Rome trough and Allegheny Plateau of northern West VA Virginia, western Maryland, and southwestern Pennsylvania KY based on three multi-fold seismic lines acquired by Amoco in the early 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
    [Show full text]
  • WV Generalized Stratigraphic Column/Chart
    Generalized Stratigraphic Chart for West Virginia Series/ Drillers’ Era System Stage Western WV Eastern WV Terminology CENOZOIC Paleogene Eocene Igneous Intrusives MESOZOIC Jurassic Igneous Intrusives PERMIAN Dunkard Group Carroll, Minshall, Murphy, Moundsville, Upper Monongahela Fm. 1st Cow Run, Little Conemaugh Group Dunkard, Big Dunkard Burning Springs, Middle Allegheny Fm. 2nd Cow Run, Kanawha Fm. Gas Sands, Horseneck (Subsystem) New River Fm. Pottsville PENNSYLVANIAN Lower Pocahontas Fm. Group Salt Sands Bluestone Fm. Pride, Ravencliff, Avis, Princeton Ss. Mauch Chunk Maxton, Little Lime, Upper Hinton Fm. Group Pencil Cave, Blue Monday Bluefield Fm. CARBONIFEROUS Greenbrier Group Big Lime, Keener, Middle Big Injun (Subsystem) Maccrady Fm. (south) MISSISSIPPIAN Lower Big Injun, Squaw, Sunbury Sh. Price Fm. Weir, Coffee (Sunbury) Sh. Berea Ss. Cleveland Sh. Gantz, 50’, 30’, Ohio Sh. Chagrin Sh. Hampshire Group Huron Sh. Gordon Stray, Gordon, Hanover Sh. bed 4th, 5th, Bayard, Java Fm. Pipe Creek Sh. bed Greenland Foreknobs Fm. Elizabeth, Warren, Upper West Falls Fm. Angola Sh. Gap Group Scherr Fm. Speechley, Balltown, Rhinestreet Sh. Bradford, Riley, Cashaqua Sh. Sonyea Fm. Middlesex Sh. Benson, Alexander, Elk, Haverty, Genesee Fm./ West River Sh. Brallier Fm. Geneseo Sh./Burket Sh. Fox, Sycamore Harrell Sh. Harrell Sh. DEVONIAN Tully Ls. Millboro Sh. Hamilton Group Mahantango Fm. Mahantango Fm. Marcellus Sh. Marcellus Sh. Middle Tioga ash beds Tioga ash beds Huntersville Chert Needmore Sh. Onondaga Ls. Oriskany Ss. “Corniferous” Lower (west only) Helderberg Group Bass Islands Fm. Big Mountain Sh. Clifton Forge Ss. Keyser Fm. PALEOZOIC Lower Keyser Mbr. PHANEROZOIC Salina Fm. Tonoloway Fm. Newburg Wills Creek Fm. Upper Bloomsburg Williamsport Fm. Fm.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists 46Th Annual Meeting Morgantown, West Virginia September 24-27, 2017
    Eastern Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists 46th Annual Meeting Morgantown, West Virginia September 24-27, 2017 Program with Abstracts Hosted by: Appalachian Geological Society West Virginia University Department of Geology and Geography With support from the West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Meeting Sponsors We appreciate your support! Marcellus Level Meeting Sponsors Utica Level Rogersville Level We appreciate your support! Eastern Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists 46th Annual Meeting Morgantown, West Virginia September 24-27, 2017 Program with Abstracts Hosted by: Appalachian Geological Society West Virginia University Department of Geology and Geography With support from the West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Cover photo used with permission from Jacob Everhart, Canary, LLC Contents Welcome………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 2017 Meeting Organizing Committee……………………………………………………………………………….1 Eastern Section AAPG Officers………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Appalachian Geological Society Officers……………………………………………………………………………2 General Information…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Registration Hours……………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Parking………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….3 Maps………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Exhibits……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……3 Presenters and Judges Room……………………………………………………………………………………..….…3 Presenters, Judges and Session Chairs Breakfast and Information……………………………………3
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Evolution and Petroleum Potential of a Cambrian Intracratonic Rift Yss Tem: Mississippi Valley Graben, Rough Creek Graben, and Rome Trough John B
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Kentucky Geological Survey Report of Kentucky Geological Survey Investigations 9-25-2018 Structural Evolution and Petroleum Potential of a Cambrian Intracratonic Rift ysS tem: Mississippi Valley Graben, Rough Creek Graben, and Rome Trough John B. Hickman University of Kentucky, [email protected] David C. Harris University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kgs_ri Part of the Tectonics and Structure Commons Repository Citation Hickman, John B. and Harris, David C., "Structural Evolution and Petroleum Potential of a Cambrian Intracratonic Rift ysS tem: Mississippi Valley Graben, Rough Creek Graben, and Rome Trough" (2018). Kentucky Geological Survey Report of Investigations. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kgs_ri/40 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Kentucky Geological Survey at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Geological Survey Report of Investigations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kentucky Geological Survey William C. Haneberg, State Geologist and Director University of Kentucky, Lexington Structural Evolution and Petroleum Potential of a Cambrian Intracratonic Rift System: Mississippi Valley Graben, Rough Creek Graben, and Rome Trough John B. Hickman and David C. Harris Report of Investigations 4 doi.org/10.13023/kgs.ri04.13 Series XIII, 2018 Our Mission The Kentucky Geological Survey is a state-supported research center and public resource within the University of Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Eau Claire Formation and Conasauga Group in Part of Kentucky and Analysis of Their Suitability As Caprocks for Deeper Co2 Sequestration
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Earth and Environmental Sciences Earth and Environmental Sciences 2012 GEOLOGY OF THE EAU CLAIRE FORMATION AND CONASAUGA GROUP IN PART OF KENTUCKY AND ANALYSIS OF THEIR SUITABILITY AS CAPROCKS FOR DEEPER CO2 SEQUESTRATION Ralph E. Bandy III University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Bandy, Ralph E. III, "GEOLOGY OF THE EAU CLAIRE FORMATION AND CONASAUGA GROUP IN PART OF KENTUCKY AND ANALYSIS OF THEIR SUITABILITY AS CAPROCKS FOR DEEPER CO2 SEQUESTRATION" (2012). Theses and Dissertations--Earth and Environmental Sciences. 8. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ees_etds/8 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Environmental Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Earth and Environmental Sciences by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained and attached hereto needed written permission statements(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine). I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information 1. Supplementary Methods
    Supplementary Information 1. Supplementary Methods Phylogenetic and age justifications for fossil calibrations The justifications for each fossil calibration are presented here for the ‘hornworts-sister’ topology (summarised in Table S2). For variations of fossil calibrations for the other hypothetical topologies, see Supplementary Tables S1-S7. Node 104: Viridiplantae; Chlorophyta – Streptophyta: 469 Ma – 1891 Ma. Fossil taxon and specimen: Tetrahedraletes cf. medinensis [palynological sample 7999: Paleopalynology Unit, IANIGLA, CCT CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina], from the Zanjón - Labrado Formations, Dapinigian Stage (Middle Ordovician), at Rio Capillas, Central Andean Basin, northwest Argentina [1]. Phylogenetic justification: Permanently fused tetrahedral tetrads and dyads found in palynomorph assemblages from the Middle Ordovician onwards are considered to be of embryophyte affinity [2-4], based on their similarities with permanent tetrads and dyads found in some extant bryophytes [5-7] and the separating tetrads within most extant cryptogams. Wellman [8] provides further justification for land plant affinities of cryptospores (sensu stricto Steemans [9]) based on: assemblages of permanent tetrads found in deposits that are interpreted as fully terrestrial in origin; similarities in the regular arrangement of spore bodies and size to extant land plant spores; possession of thick, resistant walls that are chemically similar to extant embryophyte spores [10]; some cryptospore taxa possess multilaminate walls similar to extant liverwort spores [11]; in situ cryptospores within Late Silurian to Early Devonian bryophytic-grade plants with some tracheophytic characters [12,13]. The oldest possible record of a permanent tetrahedral tetrad is a spore assigned to Tetrahedraletes cf. medinensis from an assemblage of cryptospores, chitinozoa and acritarchs collected from a locality in the Rio Capillas, part of the Sierra de Zapla of the Sierras Subandinas, Central Andean Basin, north-western Argentina [1].
    [Show full text]