DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T. Ryder Depositional environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia / by Chrysa M. Cullather. 1. Geology Appalachian Basin. 2. Sedimentary basins Appalachian Basin. I. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1839 A-D 557.3 s 88-600224 [QE78.3] [557.4] Chapter G Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Stratigraphic framework of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence in part of the central Appalachian basin and the structure of underlying block-faulted basement rocks U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN CONTENTS Abstract Gl Introduction Gl Drill-Hole Control for Section G2 Basement Structure G5 Thickness Changes in Cambrian and Ordovician Sequence G6 Stratigraphic Framework G6 Basal Sandstone Unit and Shady Dolomite (Lower Cambrian) G6 Rome Formation (Lower and Middle Cambrian) G7 Conasauga Group and Elbrook Dolomite (Middle and Upper Cambrian) G9 Gatesburg Formation (Upper Cambrian) Gil Beekmantown Group (Lower and Lower Middle Ordovician) G12 Knox Unconformity G14 St. Paul and Black River Groups (Middle Ordovician) G15 Trenton Group (Middle and Upper Ordovician) G17 Reedsville Shale and Oswego Sandstone (Upper Ordovician) G18 Juniata Formation and Queenston Shale (Upper Ordovician) G19 Tuscarora Sandstone and "Clinton" Sandstone and Shale (Lower Silurian) G19 Summary and Conclusions G19 References Cited G21 PLATE 1. Restored Stratigraphic section E-E' from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia, showing Cambrian and Ordovician sequence In pocket FIGURES 1. Map of the tectonics of Ohio, West Virginia, and adjoining States, showing the Appalachian basin, section E-E' , selected drill holes, and selected counties G3 2. Chart showing correlation of Middle Proterozoic, Cambrian, and Ordovician rocks along section E-E' and in adjoining northern Virginia G8 TABLE 1. Drill holes used in section E-E' G4 Contents III EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By Robert T. Ryder Abstract The sandstone, shale, limestone, and dolomite unit, which is closely associated with the highly block faulted A 310-mi-long restored Stratigraphic cross section Proterozoic basement terrane, is composed, in ascending between Morrow County, Ohio, and Pendleton County, order, of the Chilhowee Group, a basal sandstone unit, West Virginia, provides new details of Cambrian and the Shady Dolomite, the Rome Formation, and the Cona- Ordovician stratigraphy in the central Appalachian basin. sauga Group (part). This part of the sequence is Early and The cross section shows abrupt eastward thickening of the Middle Cambrian in age. The dolomite and sandstone unit Cambrian and Ordovician sequence across a northeast- forms the core of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence. trending fault-controlled hinge zone, which runs along In the eastern part of the section, this unit consists, in the western margin of the Rome trough and coincides ascending order, of the Middle and Upper Cambrian with the Ohio-West Virginia State line. The restored cross Elbrook Dolomite, the Upper Cambrian Gatesburg Forma­ section shows that about 5,000 ft of pre-Middle Ordovi­ tion, and the Lower to lower Middle Ordovician Beekman- cian structural relief separates Precambrian basement town Group. In the Rome trough and the adjoining rocks west of the hinge zone from those in the adjoining Ohio-West Virginia hinge zone, the dolomite and sand­ Rome trough. stone unit consists, in ascending order, of the Upper West of the Ohio-West Virginia hinge zone, the Cambrian part of the Conasauga Group, the Upper Cam­ thickness of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence is brian Gatesburg Formation, and the Lower to lower Mid­ 2,700 to 5,000 ft, whereas, east of the hinge zone in the dle Ordovician Beekmantown Group. The well-known Rome trough, the thickness of the sequence is 10,500 to Knox unconformity is located at or near the top of the 11,300 ft. Sparse subsurface data combined with outcrop Beekmantown Group. data suggest that the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence The limestone and shale unit is the thinnest of the thins across the eastern margin of the Rome trough before four lithofacies. In ascending order, this unit consists of it thickens to about 14,100 ft across a second hinge zone the Middle Ordovician St. Paul Group, the Middle Ordo­ near the Allegheny structural front in Pendleton County, vician Black River Group, and the Middle and Upper West Virginia. Ordovician Trenton Group. The sandstone and shale unit In general, the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence consists of (1) a lower gray shale unit, the Upper Ordovi­ along this section consists of four major lithofacies that cian Reedsville Shale; (2) a middle argillaceous sandstone are predominantly shallow marine to peritidal in origin. In at the eastern end of the section, the Upper Ordovician ascending Stratigraphic order, the lithofacies are identi­ Oswego Sandstone; and (3) an upper red shale, siltstone, fied by the following descriptive names: (1) sandstone, and sandstone unit, the Upper Ordovician Juniata Forma­ shale, limestone, and dolomite unit, (2) dolomite and tion and its equivalent Queenston Shale. sandstone unit, (3) limestone and shale unit, and (4) shale and sandstone unit. Each of these units and most associ­ ated subunits thicken from west to east across the section. INTRODUCTION The central Appalachian basin in Ohio, West Vir­ Manuscript approved for publication July 30, 1990. ginia, and Virginia extends eastward from the Cincinnati Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks, Central Appalachian Basin G1 and Findlay arches on the northwest, across the Rome formal terms Lower, Middle, and Upper to the Ordovician, trough and the Allegheny structural front, to the allochtho- I identify them on the time-stratigraphic chart shown in nous Blue Ridge terrane on the southeast (fig. 1). A figure 2. Following many Ordovician specialists in North concealed part of the basin continues eastward for a America (for example, Repetski, 1985; Sweet and Berg- minimum of 30 mi beneath the Blue Ridge (Harris and strom, 1986; Shaw and others, 1990), this paper equates the others, 1982; de Witt and Milici, in press). Ibexian (Canadian) Series with the Lower Ordovician, the Oil and gas exploration in the Ohio and West Virginia Whiterockian and Mohawkian Series combined with the parts of the basin in the 1960's and 1970's resulted in the Middle Ordovician, and the Cincinnatian Series with the drilling of a modest number of holes into or near Precam- Upper Ordovician. brian basement rocks (Calvert, 1964, 1965; Perry, 1964; Kornfeld, 1974; Oil and Gas Journal, 1967, 1975, 1976). DRILL-HOLE CONTROL FOR SECTION On the basis of geophysical- and lithologic-log data from these drill holes, I have drawn a 310-mi-long restored Section E-E' (pi. 1), the subject of this paper, is one stratigraphic cross section through the Cambrian and Ordo- of 12 sections that I have drawn (Ryder, 1987, 1988, 1989) vician sequence between Morrow County, Ohio, and Pend- to show the stratigraphic framework of Cambrian and leton County, West Virginia (section E-E', fig. 1). The Ordovician rocks across the Appalachian basin from Penn­ stratigraphic framework of the Cambrian and Ordovician sylvania to Tennessee. The section in this paper is identified sequence along this cross section and, to a lesser extent, the as E-E' in order to maintain continuity with my previous structure of the underlying block-faulted basement rocks are presentations of Cambrian and Ordovician stratigraphy of the main topics of this paper. the basin. Twelve drill holes ranging from 5 to 60 mi apart The stratigraphic
Recommended publications
  • (LOWER PENNSYLVANIAN) in the PERMIAN BASIN Wayne R. Wright Bureau of Economic Geol

    (LOWER PENNSYLVANIAN) in the PERMIAN BASIN Wayne R. Wright Bureau of Economic Geol

    DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF THE ATOKAN SUCCESSION (LOWER PENNSYLVANIAN) IN THE PERMIAN BASIN Wayne R. Wright Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas ABSTRACT Atokan-age units in the Permian Basin record a 2nd-order transgression, with aerially restricted, lower Atokan fluvial to shallow-marine siliciclastics followed by pervasive carbonate deposition. In general, Atokan-age siliciclastics dominated deposition in the west of the Permian Basin while carbonate deposition dominated throughout the rest of the basin. Predominance of carbonate facies across most of the Permian Basin is due to (1) lack of siliciclastic supply, (2) overall 2nd-order rising sea level, and (3) progradation of the Upper Marble Falls Formation onto the Eastern Shelf. Progradation was due partly to lower accommodation to the west and backstepping/retreat from encroaching Atokan deltaics to the east. The beginning of the Atokan is marked by a sea-level drop and subsequent lowstand conditions. A sequence boundary separates the Atokan from the underlying Morrowan carbonate section throughout the Permian Basin. Siliciclastic deposition in and around the Permian Basin is more aerially restricted than in the Morrowan. The earliest Atokan lowstand event is manifested in alluvial and fluvial incised-valley sediments in Lea County, New Mexico, and the Broken Bone Graben (Cottle County, Texas); fan- delta deposits in the Palo Duro Basin and Taylor Draw field (Upton County, Texas); and 1 post-Lower Marble Falls–pre-Upper Marble falls conglomerates (Gibbons Formation?) on the Llano Uplift. Following the lowstand event, a 2nd-order transgression appears to have dominated throughout the rest of the Atokan; however 3rd- and 4th-order, high- amplitude, sea-level fluctuations also occurred.
  • Further Paleomagnetic Evidence for Oroclinal Rotation in the Central Folded Appalachians from the Bloomsburg and the Mauch Chunk Formations

    Further Paleomagnetic Evidence for Oroclinal Rotation in the Central Folded Appalachians from the Bloomsburg and the Mauch Chunk Formations

    TECTONICS, VOL. 7, NO. 4, PAGES 749-759, AUGUST 1988 FURTHER PALEOMAGNETIC EVIDENCE FOR OROCLINAL ROTATION IN THE CENTRAL FOLDED APPALACHIANS FROM THE BLOOMSBURG AND THE MAUCH CHUNK FORMATIONS Dennis V. Kent Lamont-DohertyGeological Observatory and Departmentof GeologicalSciences ColumbiaUniversity, Palisades, New York Abstract.Renewed paleomagnetic investigations of red fromthe Bloomsburg, Mauch Chunk, and revised results bedsof theUpper Silurian Bloomsburg and the Lower recentlyreported for theUpper Devonian Catskill Formation Carboniferous Mauch Chunk Formations were undertaken togetherindicate 22.8•>+_11.9 oof relativerotation, accounting with theobjective of obtainingevidence regarding the for approximatelyhalf thepresent change in structuraltrend possibilityof oroclinalbending as contributing to thearcuate aroundthe Pennsylvania salient. The oroclinalrotation can be structuraltrend of thePennsylvania salient. These formations regardedas a tightenS.*'.3 o/'a lessarcuate depositional package cropout on both limbs of thesalient and earlier, but less thatdeveloped across a basementreentrant, to achievea definitivepaleomagnetic studies on these units indicate that curvaturecloser to that of the earlierzigzag continental margin earlyacquired magnetizations can be recovered. Oriented outline. sampleswere obtained from nine sites on the southern limb of thesalient and eight sites from the northern limb in the INTRODUCTION Bloomsburg.The naturalremanent magnetizations are multivectorial,dominated by a component(B) with a A testof the oroclinehypothesis
  • Lexington Quadrangle Virginia

    Lexington Quadrangle Virginia

    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE LEXINGTON QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA KENNETH F. BICK REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS I VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1960 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE LEXINGTON QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA KENNETH F. BICK REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS I VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1960 Couuowwoer,rn op Vtncrwre DopenrupNr op Puncnesrs exo Supptv Rrculroxn 1960 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond. Virginia MenvrN M. SurHnnr,eNn, Director BOARD Vrcron W. Stnwenr, Petersburg, Chairtnan G. Ar,vrn MessnNnunc, Hampton, Viee'Chairman A. Pr,urvrnr BmnNn, Orange C. S. Cenrnn, Bristol ANpnpw A. Fenr,pv, Danville WonrnrrvcroN FauLKNEn, Glasgow SvoNpv F. Slter,r,, Roanoke EnwrN H. Wrr,r,, Richmond Wrr,r,renr P. Wooor,nv. Norfolk CONTENTS Pece Abstract. '"*i"#:;;;;: . : ::: , : ::.:::::::::..::::::. :.::.::::::: ::,r Z Geography 8 Purpose. 4 Previous Work. Present Work and Acknowledgements. 5 Geologic Formations. 6 Introduction. 6 Precambrian System. 6 Pedlar formation 6 Precambrian and Cambrian Systems. 6 Discussion. 6 Swift Run formation 8 Catoctin greenstone. I Unieoiformation...... ......... I Hampton(Harpers)formation. .......... I Erwin (Antietam) quartzite. Cambrian System . I0 Shady (Tomstown) dolomite 10 Rome (Waynesboro) formation.... ll Elbrook formation. 12 Conococheague limestone. l3 Ordovician System. ......., 14 Chepultepeclimestone. .......... 14 Beekmantown formatron. 14 New Market limestone. 15 Lincolnshire limestone. 16 Edinburg formation. 16 Martinsburg shale... 17 SilurianSystem. ......... 18 Clinchsandstone..... .......... 18 Clinton formation.
  • Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections

    Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections

    GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY REPORT SNYDER E1-A WELL TOWN OF BARTON TIOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Couch White, LLP 540 Broadway P.O. Box 22222 Albany, New York 12201 Prepared by: Continental Placer Inc. II Winners Circle Albany, New York 12205 July 25, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Depositional Sequences and General Stratigraphic Sequence ................................................ 2 2.1.1 Upper Devonian Lithologies ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Marcellus-Hamilton ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Tristates-Onondaga ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Helderberg .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Oneida-Clinton-Salina ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.6 Black River-Trenton-Utica-Frankfort .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.7 Potsdam-Beekmantown ..............................................................................................................
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia

    IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia

    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie

    Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie

    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
  • Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in The

    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in The

    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-K Chapter K Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER, ANITA G. HARRIS, and JOHN E. REPETSKI Stratigraphic framework of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence in part of the central Appalachian basin and the structure of underlying block-faulted basement rocks U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ryder, Robert T. Stratigraphic framework of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in the central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through southwestern and south-central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia / by Robert T. Ryder, Anita C. Harris, and John E. Repetski. p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Appalachian Basin ; ch. K) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839-K) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1839-K 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cambrian.
  • 2Nd International Trilobite Conference (Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, August 22-24, 1997) ABSTRACTS

    2Nd International Trilobite Conference (Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, August 22-24, 1997) ABSTRACTS

    2nd International Trilobite Conference (Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, August 22-24, 1997) ABSTRACTS. Characters and Parsimony. Jonathan M. Adrain, Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United King- dom; Gregory D. Edgecombe, Centre for Evolutionary Research, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney South, New South Wales 2000, Australia Character analysis is the single most important element of any phylogenetic study. Characters are simply criteria for comparing homologous organismic parts between taxa. Homology of organismic parts in any phylogenetic study is an a priori assumption, founded upon topological similarity through some or all stages of ontogeny. Once homolo- gies have been suggested, characters are invented by specifying bases of comparison of organismic parts from taxon to taxon within the study group. Ideally, all variation in a single homology occurring within the study group should be accounted for. Comparisons are between attributes of homologous parts, (e.g., simple presence, size of some- thing, number of something), and these attributes are referred to as character states. Study taxa are assigned member- ship in one (or more, in the case of polymorphisms) character-state for each character in the analysis. A single char- acter now implies discrete groupings of taxa, but this in itself does not constitute a phylogeny. In order to suggest or convey phylogenetic information, the historical status of each character-state, and of the the group of taxa it sug- gests, must be evaluated. That is, in the case of any two states belonging to the same character, we need to discover whether one state is primitive (broadly speaking, ancestral) or derived (representative of an evolutionary innovation) relative to the other.
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX

    View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX

    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
  • Overview of the Strategic and Structural Evolution of the Talladega Slate Belt, Alabama Appalachians

    Overview of the Strategic and Structural Evolution of the Talladega Slate Belt, Alabama Appalachians

    fl d029-08 1st pgs page 1 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 29 2012 Overview of the stratigraphic and structural evolution of the Talladega slate belt, Alabama Appalachians James F. Tull* Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University Clinton I. Barineau* Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Columbus State University ABSTRACT The allochthonous Talladega belt of eastern-northeastern Alabama and north- western Georgia is a northeast striking, fault bounded block of lower greenschist facies metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks that formed along the margin of Lau- rentia at or outboard of the seaward edge of the Alabama promontory. Bounded by metamorphic rocks of the higher grade Neoproterozoic(?) to Carboniferous eastern Blue Ridge on the southeast and unmetamorphosed to anchimetamorphic Paleozoic rocks of the Appalachian foreland on the northwest, the Talladega belt includes shelf facies rocks of the latest Neoproterozoic/earliest Cambrian Kahatchee Mountain Group, Cambrian-Ordovician Sylacauga Marble Group, and the latest Silurian(?) to uppermost Devonian/earliest Mississippian Talladega Group. Along the southeast- ern fl ank of these metasedimentary sequences, a Middle Ordovician back-arc terrane (Hillabee Greenstone) was tectonically emplaced along a cryptic pre-metamorphic thrust fault (Hillabee thrust) and subsequently dismembered with units of the upper Talladega Group along the post-metamorphic Hollins Line fault system. Importantly, strata within the Talladega belt are critical for understanding the tectonic evolution of the southern Appalachian orogen when coupled with the geologic history of adjacent terranes. Rocks of the lower Talladega Group, the Lay Dam Formation, suggest latest Silurian-earliest Devonian tectonism that is only now being recognized in other areas of the southern Appalachians.
  • EXPLANATORY TEXT for GEOLOGIC MAP of NORTH CAROLINA By

    EXPLANATORY TEXT for GEOLOGIC MAP of NORTH CAROLINA By

    North Carolina State Library t ( f jleigh NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT William P. Saunders, Director %*fo _ DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jasper L. Stuckey, State Geologist BULLETIN NUMBER 71 EXPLANATORY TEXT FOR GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA By Jasper L. Stuckey and Stephen G. Conrad RALEIGH 1958 Norffe Carolir* St** NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT William P. Saunders, Director DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jasper L. Stuckey, State Geologist BULLETIN NUMBER 71 EXPLANATORY TEXT FOR GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA By Jasper L. Stuckey and Stephen G. Conrad RALEIGH 1958 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT GOVERNOR LUTHER H. HODGES, Chairman Raleigh MILES J. SMITH, First Vice Chairman Salisbury WALTER J. DAMTOFT, Second Vice Chairman Canton CHARLES S. ALLEN ..__„___ Durham W. B. AUSTIN Jefferson F. J. BOLING Siler City H. C. BUCHAN, JR North Wilkesboro SCROOP W. ENLOE, JR Spruce Pine VOIT GILMORE Southern Pines R. M. HANES Winston-Salem LEO H. HARVEY Kinston CHARLES H. JENKINS - __..._...Ahoskie AMOS R. KEARNS High Point H. C. KENNETT Durham R.W.MARTIN Raleigh CECIL MORRIS Atlantic HUGH M. MORTON Wilmington W. EUGENE SIMMONS Tarboro T.MAX WATSON Spindale LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Raleigh, North Carolina February 4, 1958 To His Excellency, HONORABLE LUTHER H. HODGES Governor of North Carolina Sir: I have the honor to submit herewith manuscript for publication as Bulletin No. 71, "Explanatory Text for Geologic Map of North Carolina". This text is an essential part of the new geologic map of North Carolina. The new geologic map and this explanatory text contain a summary of the best information pres- ently available on the geology of North Carolina.
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And

    Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And

    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.