DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rise and Fall of Stromatolites in Shallow Marine Environments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rise and Fall of Stromatolites in Shallow Marine Environments The rise and fall of stromatolites in shallow marine environments Shanan E. Peters, Jon M. Husson, and Julia Wilcots Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA ABSTRACT Stromatolites are abundant in shallow marine sediments deposited before the evolution of animals, but in the modern ocean they are restricted to locations where the activity of animals is limited. Overall decline in the abundance of stromatolites has, therefore, been attributed to the evolution of substrate-modifying metazoans, with Phanerozoic stromatolite resurgences attributed to the aftermaths of mass extinctions. Here we use a comprehensive stratigraphic database, the published literature, and a machine reading system to show that the rock record–normalized occurrence of stromatolites in marine environments in North America exhibits three phases: an initial Paleoproterozoic (ca. 2500 Ma) increase, a sustained interval of dominance during the Proterozoic (2500–800 Ma), and a late Neoproterozoic (700–541 Ma) decline to lower mean prevalence during the Phanerozoic (541–0 Ma). Stro- matolites continued to exhibit large changes in prevalence after the evolution of metazoans, and they transiently achieved Proterozoic-like prevalence during the Paleozoic. The after- maths of major mass extinctions are not well correlated with stromatolite resurgence. Instead, stromatolite occurrence is well predicted by the prevalence of dolomite, a shift in carbonate mineralogy that is sensitive to changes in water-column and pore-water chemistry occurring during continent-scale marine transgressive-regressive cycles. Figure 1. Spatial distribution and number of stromatolite-bearing sedimentary units in INTRODUCTION abundance (Awramik, 1971, 1991; Awramik and Macrostrat (https://macrostrat.org) for North Stromatolites, attached accretionary sedi- Sprinkle, 1999; Walter and Heys, 1985; Semikha- America–Caribbean region. Polygons show approximate spatial boundaries of 1013 geo- mentary structures that are formed either inor- tov and Raaben, 1996; Riding, 2000). However, logic columns used here. Shading indicates the ganically (Lowe, 1994; Grotzinger and Rothman, most previous compilations have focused on total number of stratigraphic units identified 1996) or by microbial interactions between car- specifc time intervals, and none has taken into as containing stromatolites in each column. bonate sediment and the overlying water (Grotz- consideration temporal changes in stromatolite inger and Knoll, 1999; Bosak et al., 2013), are numbers that might be attributable to variation one of the most distinctive of all sedimentary in the quantity of sedimentary rock. defned units, 83% of which are inferred based structures. The stratigraphic distribution and Here we use a comprehensive stratigraphic on their contained biota and/or geographic and abundance of stromatolites has been viewed database covering North America and the cir- stratigraphic position to have been deposited in as a proxy record that can integrate informa- cum-Caribbean region (Fig. 1) to measure the marine and/or marginal marine environments. It tion about the physical, chemical, and biological total quantity and age of shallow marine sedi- is often diffcult to determine whether Precam- environment (Hofmann, 1973; Grotzinger, 1990; ment and the rock record–normalized frequency brian sedimentary units are marine or lacustrine Grotzinger and Knoll, 1999). For example, stro- of occurrence of stromatolites. Our approach is in origin. However, most Phanerozoic sedimen- matolite growth and morphology are responsive agnostic with respect to the genetic interpreta- tary rock is shallow marine (Peters and Husson, to the presence and abundance of grazing meta- tion of stromatolitic structures, their morphol- 2017), so our default assumption is that Precam- zoans (Garrett, 1970; Walter and Heys, 1985) ogy, or their local abundance within individual brian sedimentary rocks are also shallow marine, and possibly to the input of skeletal debris (Pratt, stratigraphic units. Instead, our goal is to mea- unless explicitly identifed otherwise. Each 1982). The evolution and diversifcation of meta- sure the relative frequency of occurrence of sedi- Macrostrat unit is assigned at least one lithol- zoans has, therefore, been identifed as a cause mentary features described as stromatolites in ogy, and most units are associated with multiple for the decline of stromatolites and other micro- the literature in a way that explicitly accounts lithologies. More than 97% of all sedimentary bially formed structures, with disruptions of for variation in the total amount of sedimen- units older than the Quaternary are assigned a animal communities in the aftermaths of major tary rock. We then use the same stratigraphic lithostratigraphic name (e.g., formation) that is mass extinctions promoting their transient rees- framework to evaluate stromatolite occurrence linked to a nomenclatural hierarchy, if applicable. tablishment (Schubert and Bottjer, 1992; Shee- in relation to carbonate mineralogy and marine Here, we also employ a simple age model that han and Harris, 2004; Baud et al., 2007; Mata animal diversity. linearly distributes time between superposed and Bottjer, 2012; but see Riding, 2000, 2005, stratigraphic units using basic geological prin- 2006). Increases in the carbonate saturation state DATA SETS AND METHODS ciples. Constraining the age model is diffcult in of the ocean have also been invoked to explain Stratigraphic data derive from 1013 region- the Precambrian, but average rates of Precam- increases in microbialite abundance (Riding, ally composited Macrostrat database (https:// brian sedimentation derived from it are compa- 2005) and inorganic seafoor carbonate precipi- macrostrat.org) geological columns (Fig. 1) rable to Phanerozoic rates (Husson and Peters, tates (Grotzinger and Knoll, 1995). covering 26 × 106 km2 in North America and 2017). The effects of correlation errors are also Several attempts have been made to com- the Caribbean (Peters, 2006, 2008; Husson and minimized in this analysis because we focus on pile stromatolite occurrences and quantify large- Peters, 2017). Within these columns there are count-based metrics and relative proportions in scale temporal trends in their morphology and 22,282 lithologically and chronostratigraphically aggregate data (Adrain and Westrop, 2000). GEOLOGY, June 2017; v. 45; no. 6; p. 1–4 | Data Repository item 2017155 | doi:10.1130/G38931.1 | Published online XX Month 2017 ©GEOLOGY 2017 Geological | Volume Society 45 | ofNumber America. 6 For| www.gsapubs.org permission to copy, contact [email protected]. 1 Figure 2. Occurrence of stromatolites over geo- logical time normalized by total number of sedimen- tary rock units in study area (Fig. 1). A: Number of stromatolite-bearing marine units normalized by all marine sedimentary rock units. B: Number of stromatolite-bearing units normalized by number of marine carbonate-bear- ing rock units. Estimated proportion ± one stan- dard error of estimate in each 1 m.y. increment is shown. Abbreviations cor- respond to inter national chrono s t ra t i g ra p h i c time intervals: Neoar.— Neoarchean; Neopro- teroz.—Neo protero zoic; Cm—Cambrian; O— Ordovician; S—Silurian; D—Devonian; C—Car- boniferous; P—Permian; Tr—Triassic; J—Jurassic; K—Cretaceous; Pg—Paleogene; Ng—Neogene. Vertical light gray bars identify Phanerozoic marine transgressive-regressive cycles (Meyers and Peters, 2011). Stromatolite prevalence is defned here as Stanford natural language processing (NLP), Whether some of these Archean structures the proportion of all North American–Caribbean which decomposes sentences into parts of formed because of biological activity remains an named marine sedimentary rock units (20,484 speech and linguistic dependencies (Manning open question (Lowe, 1994), but by the Paleo- total) or carbonate-bearing marine rock units et al., 2014). Manual assessment of a random proterozoic, stromatolites occur in ~75% of (9,643 total) that are described as preserv- sample of 3.8% of the machine-extracted stro- all named sedimentary units (Fig. 2A). There ing stromatolites. The GeoDeepDive (https:// matolite–rock unit pairs indicates an accuracy of is a decline in stromatolite occurrence dur- geodeepdive.org) digital library and machine 86%–89% at the individual level (Table DR1). ing the middle Mesoproterozoic to ~40%, but reading system (sensu Peters et al., 2014) was Incorrect pairs identifed during assessment were it increases again to ~80% by the end of the used to locate mentions of the term “stromato- removed from the analysis and the sources of Mesoproterozoic. After achieving a peak at lite” (and variations thereof) within the full text error assessed. In most cases, errors are limited ca. 1000 Ma, stromatolites decline until reach- of published documents. At the time of this anal- to situations involving multiple sentences that ing a Proterozoic minimum at end of the eon. ysis, GeoDeepDive contained most geoscience- express comparative or complex relationships Stromatolite occurrence remains low during relevant titles from Elsevier, Wiley, Canada Sci- between superposed stratigraphic units. Approx- the early Cambrian, but by the Early Ordovi- ence Publishing, and PLoS One, and content imately 30% of the incorrect pairs found during cian stromatolites achieve Neoproterozoic- to from the U.S. Geological Survey, the Society for manual assessment were identifed as correct in Mesoproterozoic-like prevalence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratographic Coloumn of Iowa
    Iowa Stratographic Column November 4, 2013 QUATERNARY Holocene Series DeForest Formation Camp Creek Member Roberts Creek Member Turton Submember Mullenix Submember Gunder Formation Hatcher Submember Watkins Submember Corrington Formation Flack Formation Woden Formation West Okoboji Formation Pleistocene Series Wisconsinan Episode Peoria Formation Silt Facies Sand Facies Dows Formation Pilot Knob Member Lake Mills Member Morgan Member Alden Member Noah Creek Formation Sheldon Creek Formation Roxana/Pisgah Formation Illinoian Episode Loveland Formation Glasford Formation Kellerville Memeber Pre-Illinoian Wolf Creek Formation Hickory Hills Member Aurora Memeber Winthrop Memeber Alburnett Formation A glacial tills Lava Creek B Volcanic Ash B glacial tills Mesa Falls Volcanic Ash Huckleberry Ridge Volcanic Ash C glacial tills TERTIARY Salt & Pepper sands CRETACEOUS "Manson" Group "upper Colorado" Group Niobrara Formation Fort Benton ("lower Colorado ") Group Carlile Shale Greenhorn Limestone Graneros Shale Dakota Formation Woodbury Member Nishnabotna Member Windrow Formation Ostrander Member Iron Hill Member JURASSIC Fort Dodge Formation PENNSYLVANIAN (subsystem of Carboniferous System) Wabaunsee Group Wood Siding Formation Root Formation French Creek Shale Jim Creek Limestone Friedrich Shale Stotler Formation Grandhaven Limestone Dry Shale Dover Limestone Pillsbury Formation Nyman Coal Zeandale Formation Maple Hill Limestone Wamego Shale Tarkio Limestone Willard Shale Emporia Formation Elmont Limestone Harveyville Shale Reading Limestone Auburn
    [Show full text]
  • The Rock Abrasion Record at Gale Crater: Mars Science Laboratory
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE The rock abrasion record at Gale Crater: Mars 10.1002/2013JE004579 Science Laboratory results from Bradbury Special Section: Landing to Rocknest Results from the first 360 Sols of the Mars Science Laboratory N. T. Bridges1, F. J. Calef2, B. Hallet3, K. E. Herkenhoff4, N. L. Lanza5, S. Le Mouélic6, C. E. Newman7, Mission: Bradbury Landing D. L. Blaney2,M.A.dePablo8,G.A.Kocurek9, Y. Langevin10,K.W.Lewis11, N. Mangold6, through Yellowknife Bay S. Maurice12, P.-Y. Meslin12,P.Pinet12,N.O.Renno13,M.S.Rice14, M. E. Richardson7,V.Sautter15, R. S. Sletten3,R.C.Wiens6, and R. A. Yingst16 Key Points: • Ventifacts in Gale Crater 1Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, USA, 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA, 3Department • Maybeformedbypaleowind of Earth and Space Sciences, College of the Environments, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, 4U.S. • Can see abrasion textures at range 5 6 of scales Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, LPGNantes, UMR 6112, CNRS/Université de Nantes, Nantes, France, 7Ashima Research, Pasadena, California, USA, 8Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain, 9Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Supporting Information: Austin, Texas, USA, 10Institute d’Astrophysique Spatiale, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France, 11Department of • Figure S1 12 fi • Figure S2 Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, Centre National de la Recherche Scienti que, Institut 13 • Table S1 de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, CNRS-Université Toulouse, Toulouse, France, Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Science; College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, Correspondence to: 14Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, 15Lab N.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life Author(S): J
    Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life Author(s): J. William Schopf Reviewed work(s): Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 260, No. 5108 (Apr. 30, 1993), pp. 640-646 Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2881249 . Accessed: 07/04/2012 21:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Science. http://www.jstor.org REFERENCESAND NOTES 9. Y. Hiwatari,in Molecular Dynamics Simulations, F. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988), vol. 1, p. Yonezawa, Ed., vol. 113 of Springer Series in 247. 1. H. Takayama, News Letter No. 1 (Research Group Solid State Sciences (Springer-Verlag, Heidel- 23. F. Yonezawa, S. Sakamoto, M. Hori, J. Non-Ctyst. on a new project, "Computational Physics as a berg, 1992), p. 32. Solids 137, 135 (1991). New Frontier in Condensed Matter Research" 10. S. Fujiwara and F. Yonezawa, in preparation. 24. F. Yonezawa and S. Sakamoto, Optoelectronics- under the support of the Grant-in-Aidfor Scientific 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Variations in Yellowknife Bay Formation Sedimentary Rocks
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Chemical variations in Yellowknife Bay formation 10.1002/2014JE004681 sedimentary rocks analyzed by ChemCam Special Section: on board the Curiosity rover on Mars Results from the first 360 Sols of the Mars Science Laboratory N. Mangold1, O. Forni2, G. Dromart3, K. Stack4, R. C. Wiens5, O. Gasnault2, D. Y. Sumner6, M. Nachon1, Mission: Bradbury Landing P.-Y. Meslin2, R. B. Anderson7, B. Barraclough4, J. F. Bell III8, G. Berger2, D. L. Blaney9, J. C. Bridges10, through Yellowknife Bay F. Calef9, B. Clark11, S. M. Clegg5, A. Cousin5, L. Edgar8, K. Edgett12, B. Ehlmann4, C. Fabre13, M. Fisk14, J. Grotzinger4, S. Gupta15, K. E. Herkenhoff7, J. Hurowitz16, J. R. Johnson17, L. C. Kah18, N. Lanza19, Key Points: 2 1 20 21 12 16 2 • J. Lasue , S. Le Mouélic , R. Léveillé , E. Lewin , M. Malin , S. McLennan , S. Maurice , Fluvial sandstones analyzed by 22 22 23 19 19 24 25 ChemCam display subtle chemical N. Melikechi , A. Mezzacappa , R. Milliken , H. Newsom , A. Ollila , S. K. Rowland , V. Sautter , variations M. Schmidt26, S. Schröder2,C.d’Uston2, D. Vaniman27, and R. Williams27 • Combined analysis of chemistry and texture highlights the role of 1Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique de Nantes, CNRS, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France, 2Institut de Recherche diagenesis en Astrophysique et Planétologie, CNRS/Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, Toulouse, France, 3Laboratoire de Géologie de • Distinct chemistry in upper layers 4 5 suggests distinct setting and/or Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, Los Alamos National 6 source Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA, 7Astrogeology Science Center, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation Near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA
    The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon Volume 84 Issue 1 Article 6 1-6-2012 Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA Sophia L. May College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] Larry E. Davis College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] David G. Brown College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/compass Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation May, Sophia L.; Davis, Larry E.; and Brown, David G. (2012) "Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA," The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon: Vol. 84: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/compass/vol84/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ON THE OUTCROP Algal Stromatolites in the Willow River Member of the Lower Ordovician Shakopee Formation near Chatfield, Minnesota, USA Sophia L. May, Larry E. Davis, and David G. Brown Department of Biology College of Saint Benedict/Saint John’s University Collegeville, Minnesota, 56321 USA [email protected] LOCATION From the intersection of (Olmsted) Co. Hwy 2 and U.S. 52 Rochester I-90 (Main Street) in Chatfield, MN drive N south-southeast on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 59319647.Pdf
    Article "Stratigraphic and Structural Framework of Upper Middle Ordovician Rocks in the Head Lake- Burleigh Falls Area of South-Central Ontario" Bruce V. Sanford Géographie physique et Quaternaire, vol. 47, n° 3, 1993, p. 253-268. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/032956ar DOI: 10.7202/032956ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 12 février 2017 07:14 Géographie physique et Quaternaire, 1993, vol. 47, n° 3, p. 253-268, 15 fig. STRATIGRAPHIC AND STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK OF UPPER MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN ROCKS IN THE HEAD LAKE- BURLEIGH FALLS AREA OF SOUTH- CENTRAL ONTARIO Bruce V. SANFORD, Independent Exploration Geologist,17 Meadowglade Gardens, Nepean, Ontario K2G 5J4. ABSTRACT Field investigations in the RÉSUMÉ Cadre stratigraphique et structu­ ZUSAM M EN FASSU NG Stratigraphischer Head Lake-Burleigh Falls area of south- ral des roches de l'Ordovicien moyen supé­ und struktureller Rahmen der Felsen aus central Ontario, that focused mainly on the rieur dans la région de Head Lake-Burleigh dem oberen mittleren Ordovizium in der Covey Hill(?), Shadow Lake, Gull River and Falls, au centre-sud de l'Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections
    GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY REPORT SNYDER E1-A WELL TOWN OF BARTON TIOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Couch White, LLP 540 Broadway P.O. Box 22222 Albany, New York 12201 Prepared by: Continental Placer Inc. II Winners Circle Albany, New York 12205 July 25, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Depositional Sequences and General Stratigraphic Sequence ................................................ 2 2.1.1 Upper Devonian Lithologies ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Marcellus-Hamilton ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Tristates-Onondaga ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Helderberg .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Oneida-Clinton-Salina ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.6 Black River-Trenton-Utica-Frankfort .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.7 Potsdam-Beekmantown ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Economic Geology: Exploration for Coal, Oil and Minerals
    Downloaded from http://mem.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 PART 4 Appendix: Economic geology: exploration for coal, oil and Glossary of stratigraphic names, 463 minerals, 449 References, 477 Index of place names, 455 General Index, 515 Alkahornet, a distinctive landmark on the northwest, entrance to Isfjorden, is formed of early Varanger carbonates. The view is from Trygghamna ('Safe Harbour') with CSE motorboats Salterella and Collenia by the shore, with good anchorage and easy access inland. Photo M. J. Hambrey, CSE (SP. 1561). Routine journeys to the fjords of north Spitsbergen and Nordaustlandet pass by the rocky coastline of northwest Spitsbergen. Here is a view of Smeerenburgbreen from Smeerenburgfjordenwhich affords some shelter being protected by outer islands. On one of these was Smeerenburg, the principal base for early whaling, hence the Dutch name for 'blubber town'. Photo N. I. Cox, CSE 1989. Downloaded from http://mem.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 The CSE motorboat Salterella in Liefdefjorden looking north towards Erikbreen with largely Devonian rocks in the background unconformably on metamorphic Proterozoic to the left. Photo P. W. Web, CSE 1989. Access to cliffs and a glacier route (up Hannabreen) often necessitates crossing blocky talus (here Devonian in foreground) and then possibly a pleasanter route up the moraine on to hard glacier ice. Moraine generally affords a useful introduction to the rocks to be traversed along the glacial margin. The dots in the sky are geese training their young to fly in V formation for their migration back to the UK at the end of the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 23 May 2017 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Betts, Marissa J. and Paterson, John R. and Jago, James B. and Jacquet, Sarah M. and Skovsted, Christian B. and Topper, Timothy P. and Brock, Glenn A. (2017) 'Global correlation of the early Cambrian of South Australia : shelly fauna of the Dailyatia odyssei Zone.', Gondwana research., 46 . pp. 240-279. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.02.007 Publisher's copyright statement: c 2017 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Accepted Manuscript Global correlation of the early Cambrian of South Australia: Shelly fauna of the Dailyatia odyssei Zone Marissa J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores
    A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment 2 cm Sample of spheroidal sphalerite with dendritic sphalerite, galena, and iron sulfides (pyrite plus marcasite) from the Pomorzany mine. Note the “up direction” is indicated by “snow-on-the-roof” texture of galena and Scientificsphalerite Investigations alnong colloform Report layers of2010–5070–A light-colored spahlerite. Hydrothermal sulfide clasts in the left center of the sample are encrusted by sphalerire and iron sulfides. Size of sample is 20x13 cm. Photo by David Leach. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Sample of spheroidal sphalerite with dendritic sphalerite, galena, and iron sulfides (pyrite plus mar- casite) from Pomorzany mine. Note the “up direction” is indicated by “snow-on-the-roof” texture of galena and sphalerite along colloform layers of light-colored sphalerite. Hydrothermal sulfide clasts in the left center of the sample are encrusted by sphalerite and iron sulfides. Size of sample is 20x13 centimeters. (Photograph by David L. Leach, U.S. Geological Survey.) A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley- Type Lead-Zinc Ores By David L. Leach, Ryan D. Taylor, David L. Fey, Sharon F. Diehl, and Richard W. Saltus Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S.
    [Show full text]