DOCSLIB.ORG

A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment 2 cm Sample of spheroidal sphalerite with dendritic sphalerite, galena, and iron sulfides (pyrite plus marcasite) from the Pomorzany mine. Note the “up direction” is indicated by “snow-on-the-roof” texture of galena and Scientificsphalerite Investigations alnong colloform Report layers of2010–5070–A light-colored spahlerite. Hydrothermal sulfide clasts in the left center of the sample are encrusted by sphalerire and iron sulfides. Size of sample is 20x13 cm. Photo by David Leach. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Sample of spheroidal sphalerite with dendritic sphalerite, galena, and iron sulfides (pyrite plus mar- casite) from Pomorzany mine. Note the “up direction” is indicated by “snow-on-the-roof” texture of galena and sphalerite along colloform layers of light-colored sphalerite. Hydrothermal sulfide clasts in the left center of the sample are encrusted by sphalerite and iron sulfides. Size of sample is 20x13 centimeters. (Photograph by David L. Leach, U.S. Geological Survey.) A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley- Type Lead-Zinc Ores By David L. Leach, Ryan D. Taylor, David L. Fey, Sharon F. Diehl, and Richard W. Saltus Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Leach, D.L., Taylor, R.D., Fey, D.L., Diehl, S.F., and Saltus, R.W., 2010, A deposit model for Mississippi Valley-Type lead-zinc ores, chap. A of Mineral deposit models for resource assessment: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investi- gations Report 2010–5070–A, 52 p. iii Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................3 Deposit Type and Associated Commodities .............................................................................................3 Name .....................................................................................................................................................3 Synonyms ..............................................................................................................................................3 Brief Description ..................................................................................................................................3 Associated and Transitional Deposit Types ....................................................................................4 SEDEX ...........................................................................................................................................4 Sandstone-Lead ..........................................................................................................................4 Sandstone-Hosted Lead Deposits ...........................................................................................4 Fracture Controlled Pb-Zn and Fluorite-Barite Deposits .....................................................4 Distal Pb-Zn Skarn and Igneous Related Pb-Zn Mantos Deposits .....................................4 Primary Commodities ..........................................................................................................................4 Byproduct Commodities .....................................................................................................................4 Trace Constituents ...............................................................................................................................5 Example Deposits.................................................................................................................................5 MVT Metallogenic Provinces ...................................................................................................5 MVT Districts ...............................................................................................................................5 Important Deposits .....................................................................................................................5 Historical Evolution of Descriptive and Genetic Knowledge and Concepts .......................................5 Regional Environment ..................................................................................................................................6 Geotectonic Environment ...................................................................................................................6 Temporal (Secular) Relations .............................................................................................................6 Duration of Magmatic-Hydrothermal System and/or Mineralizing Processes .........................6 Relation to Structures .........................................................................................................................7 Relations to Igneous Rocks ................................................................................................................7 Relations to Sedimentary Rocks .......................................................................................................7 Relations to Metamorphic Rocks ......................................................................................................7 Physical Description of Deposits ...............................................................................................................8 Dimensions in Plan View ....................................................................................................................8 Size of Hydrothermal System Relative to Extent of Economically Mineralized Rock ...............8 Vertical Extent ......................................................................................................................................8 Form and Shape ...................................................................................................................................8 Host Rocks ..........................................................................................................................................10 Structural Setting(s) and Controls ..................................................................................................10 Use of Geophysics in Resource Assessment for Mississippi Valley-Type Deposits .......................12 Hypogene Ore Characteristics .................................................................................................................13 Mineralogy and Mineral Assemblages ..........................................................................................13 Paragenesis ........................................................................................................................................13 Zoning Patterns ..................................................................................................................................13 Textures, Structures, and Grain Size ..............................................................................................15 iv Hypogene Gangue Characteristics...........................................................................................................15 Mineralogy and Mineral Assemblages ...........................................................................................15 Paragenesis and Zoning Patterns ....................................................................................................16 Hydrothermal Alteration .............................................................................................................................16 Dissolution and Hydrothermal Brecciation ....................................................................................16 Dolomite and Calcite Alteration .......................................................................................................16 Silicification .........................................................................................................................................16 Clay, Mica, and Feldspar Diagenesis ..............................................................................................16 Supergene Ore and Gangue Characteristics ..........................................................................................16
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
    MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratographic Coloumn of Iowa
    Iowa Stratographic Column November 4, 2013 QUATERNARY Holocene Series DeForest Formation Camp Creek Member Roberts Creek Member Turton Submember Mullenix Submember Gunder Formation Hatcher Submember Watkins Submember Corrington Formation Flack Formation Woden Formation West Okoboji Formation Pleistocene Series Wisconsinan Episode Peoria Formation Silt Facies Sand Facies Dows Formation Pilot Knob Member Lake Mills Member Morgan Member Alden Member Noah Creek Formation Sheldon Creek Formation Roxana/Pisgah Formation Illinoian Episode Loveland Formation Glasford Formation Kellerville Memeber Pre-Illinoian Wolf Creek Formation Hickory Hills Member Aurora Memeber Winthrop Memeber Alburnett Formation A glacial tills Lava Creek B Volcanic Ash B glacial tills Mesa Falls Volcanic Ash Huckleberry Ridge Volcanic Ash C glacial tills TERTIARY Salt & Pepper sands CRETACEOUS "Manson" Group "upper Colorado" Group Niobrara Formation Fort Benton ("lower Colorado ") Group Carlile Shale Greenhorn Limestone Graneros Shale Dakota Formation Woodbury Member Nishnabotna Member Windrow Formation Ostrander Member Iron Hill Member JURASSIC Fort Dodge Formation PENNSYLVANIAN (subsystem of Carboniferous System) Wabaunsee Group Wood Siding Formation Root Formation French Creek Shale Jim Creek Limestone Friedrich Shale Stotler Formation Grandhaven Limestone Dry Shale Dover Limestone Pillsbury Formation Nyman Coal Zeandale Formation Maple Hill Limestone Wamego Shale Tarkio Limestone Willard Shale Emporia Formation Elmont Limestone Harveyville Shale Reading Limestone Auburn
    [Show full text]
  • Metacinnabar Hgs C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Metacinnabar HgS c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Cubic. Point Group: 43m. Commonly massive; rarely as small (to 1 mm) tetrahedral crystals having rough faces. Twinning: Common on {111}, forming lamellae in polished section. Physical Properties: Fracture: Subconchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 3 VHN = n.d. D(meas.) = 7.65 D(calc.) = 7.63 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Grayish black; in polished section, grayish white. Streak: Black. Luster: Metallic. Pleochroism: Weak, rarely. Anisotropism: Very weak, rarely. R: (400) 28.4, (420) 27.6, (440) 26.8, (460) 26.3, (480) 25.9, (500) 25.6, (520) 25.4, (540) 25.2, (560) 25.1, (580) 25.0, (600) 24.9, (620) 24.9, (640) 24.8, (660) 24.7, (680) 24.7, (700) 24.7 Cell Data: Space Group: F 43m. a = 5.8717(5) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. 3.378 (100), 2.068 (55), 1.7644 (45), 2.926 (35), 1.3424 (12), 1.6891 (10), 1.3085 (10) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) (4) Hg 79.73 67.45 81.33 86.22 Zn 4.23 3.10 Cd 11.72 Fe trace 0.2 Se 1.08 6.49 S 14.58 15.63 10.30 13.78 Total 99.62 98.10 98.12 100.00 (1) Guadalc´azar,Mexico; corresponds to (Hg0.85Zn0.14)Σ=0.99(S0.97Se0.03)Σ=1.00. (2) Uland area, Russia; corresponds to (Hg0.69Cd0.21Zn0.10Fe0.01)Σ=1.01S1.00. (3) San Onofre, Mexico; corresponds to Hg1.00(S0.80Se0.20)Σ=1.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Germanium-Bearing Colusite from the Yanahara Mine, Japan, and Its Significance to Ore Genesis
    RESOURCE GEOLOGY, 44(1), 33•`38, 1994 Germanium-bearing Colusite from the Yanahara Mine, Japan, and Its Significance to Ore Genesis Katsuo KASE*, Masahiro YAMAMOTO* and Chiharu MITSUNO* Abstract: Colusite, Cu26V2(As,Ge)6S32, containing up to 4.3 wt.% Ge occurs with pyrite, chalcopyrite and bomite in sphalerite-barite-rich ores of the volcanogenic massive sulfide orebody at Hinotani L-1, the Yanahara mine. Electron micro- probe analysis reveals that As and V are pentavalent and Ge is tetravalent in the mineral the same as in germanite and renierite, suggesting that the Ge-bearing colusite was precipitated under high fs2 and foe conditions. These Ge-bearing min- erals sometimes occur in the Kuroko deposits related with felsic volcanism, associated with pyrite, chalcopyrite and bomite as at Hinotani, while practically no Ge-bearing minerals occur in the Besshi-type deposits related with mafic volcanism. It is concluded that the ore solutions responsible for the Hinotani L-1 orebody and possibly for whole orebodies at Yanahara are related with felsic volcanism. ore mineralogy is similar to that of the typical 1. Introduction Besshi-type deposits. The deposit is thus ambigu- There are two major types of volcanogenic mas- ous in the classification, and sometimes called sive sulfide deposits in Japan: Kuroko deposits and Besshi-type deposits. The Kuroko deposits are genetically related with Miocene dacitic-rhy- olitic volcanism, and characterized by high Zn, Pb and Ag contents and an abundance of sulfate min- erals. The Besshi-type cupriferous iron sulfide de- posits, equivalent to Kieslager, occur in the se- quence consisting of basalts and sediments, or their metamorphic equivalents, and are very low in the Pb content and poor in sulfate minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • DESCRIPTIVE MODEL of KIPUSHI Cu-Pb-Zn
    Model 32c DESCRIPTIVE MODEL OF KIPUSHI Cu-Pb-Zn By Dennis P. Cox and Lawrence R. Bernstein DESCRIPTION Massive base-metal sulfides and As-sulfosalts in dolomite breccias characterized by minor Co, Ge, Ga, U, and V. GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Rock Types Dolomite, shale. No rocks of unequivocal igneous origin are related to ore formation. [The pseudoaplite at Tsumeb is herein assumed to be a metasedimentary rock following H. D. LeRoex (1955, unpublished report).] Textures Fine-grained massive and carbonaceous, laminated, stromatolitic dolomites. Age Range Unknown; host rocks are Proterozoic in Africa, Devonian in Alaska, Pennsylvanian in Utah. Depositional Environment High fluid flow along tabular or pipe-like fault- or karst (?)-breccia zones. Tectonic Setting(s) Continental platform or shelf terrane with continental or passive margin rifting. Ore formation at Tsumeb and Ruby Creek predates folding. Associated Deposit Types Sedimentary copper, U-veins, barite veins. Sedimentary exhalative Pb-Zn may be a lateral facies. DEPOSIT DESCRIPTION Mineralogy Ruby Creek: pyrite, bornite, chalcocite, chalcopyrite, carrollite, sphalerite, tennantite. Tsumeb: galena, sphalerite, bornite, tennantite, enargite. Kipushi: sphalerite, bornite, chalcopyrite, carrollite, chalcocite, tennantite, pyrite. Less abundant minerals in these deposits are linnaeite, Co-pyrite, germanite, renierite, gallite, tungstenite, molybdenite, and native Bi. Bituminous matter in vugs. At Apex mine, marcasite. Texture/Structure Massive replacement, breccia filling, or stockwork. Replacement textures of pyrite after marcasite at Ruby Creek and Apex. Alteration Dolomitization, sideritization, and silicification may be related to mineralization. Early pyrite or arsenopyrite as breccia filling or dissemination. Ore Controls Abundant diagenetic pyrite or other source of S acts as precipitant of base metals in zones of high porosity and fluid flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrite's Evil Twin Marcasite and Pyrite Are Two Common Minerals. Both Fes2 Chemically, Making Them Polymorphs. Polym
    Marcasite - Pyrite's Evil Twin Marcasite and pyrite are two common minerals. Both FeS2 chemically, making them polymorphs. Polymorphs are minerals with the same chemical composition but different crystal structures. Diamond and graphite are polymorphs, both minerals being pure carbon. In diamond and graphite the different arrangement of carbon atoms gives these two minerals of very different physical properties. Pyrite and marcasite, on the other hand, have almost identical physical properties, making them tough to tell from each other. Let's go through their properties. Both are metallic and pale yellow to brassy yellow. Both can tarnish and be iridescent. Both are 6-6.5 on the Mohs' hardness scale. Neither have a particularly prominent cleavage, although marcasite does have one that occasionally shows up. Both have densities of about 5 grams per cubic centimeter (pyrite is a bit denser, but not enough to be detectible without delicate measurements). They can even be found together in the same rock. Fortunately these minerals often show good outer crystal shapes that are quite different. Pyrite crystals are generally equant, and dominated by cubes, octahedrons and 12-sided pyritohedrons. Marcasite crystals are usually rectangular (tabular) with wedge-shaped ends and tend to form in star shaped, radiating or cockscomb groups. Marcasite is also much more restricted in occurrence than pyrite, forming only in low temperature, near surface, very acidic environments. It is found in some ore deposits, in sediments formed under somewhat stagnant conditions and as ground water precipitates in rocks such as in limestone and shale. Although pyrite can also be found in many of these same environments, the crystal shapes are diagnostic.
    [Show full text]
  • Ity of Minerais with the Pyrite, Marcasite
    STRUCTURALSTABI!.ITY OF MINERAISWITH THE PYRITE, MARCASITE,ARSENOPYRITE AND L6ILINGITESTRUCTURES ERNEST H. NICKEL M,ineral Sc'iencesD'i,v,is,ion, M,ines Branch, Departrnentof Energy, M.i,nesand, Resowrces, 6id Booth Street,Ottawa, Canad,a AssrRAcr The structural stabilities of the disulphides, diarsenides and sulpharsenides of iron, cobalt and nickel are explained on thi basis of ligand field theory. ihe structural stabilities can be correlated with the number of non-bonding d elecirons of the metal atom in the structure, and can.be explained by the tenden"yif th" .ornpourrd" to form structures in which maximum electron spin-pairing takes place. The pyrite,structure, which is favoured-by -!tub with six or more non-bonding d electrons, and which includes pyrite, cattierite, vaesite, cobaltite gur"aormt"i i, characterized by metal-sulphur oclahedra joined at corneis, with no apparintlnteraction""a between the d electrons of neighbouring metal atoms. The otiei structures are all characterized by shared octahedral edgesalong one direction, so that the metal atoms are brought into.relatively close proximlty. In-the marcasite structure, which includes marcasite and rammelsbergite, both with six non-bonding d electrons, the metal atoms repel each other because of completely filled tzs levek. In dre arsenopyrite structure, whichjncludes arsenopyrite and siffiorite, both oi which havefrve iJ eleciions that do noi participate.in metal-sulphur londing, pairs of metals are drawn together to permit spin- pairing of the odd electrons. In ldllingite, in which the iron atom islssumed io have iour non-bonding-d electrons, the d orbitals in.the a crystallographic direction are emptied, permitting close iron-iron approachesin this direciion, r"-wull as complete of the electrons in the two remaining ,2sorbitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive Mineralogy of Pugh Quarry, Northwestern Ohio: Sphalerite1
    Copyright © 1978 Ohio Acad. Sci. 0030-0950/78/0005-027211.50/0 DESCRIPTIVE MINERALOGY OF PUGH QUARRY, NORTHWESTERN OHIO: SPHALERITE1 DAVID F. PARR2 and LUKE L. Y. CHANG, Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 Abstract. The Devonian rocks at Pugh Quarry have three distinct types of sphalerite (banded massive, spheroidal, and tiny euhedral). Occurrence of the banded massive sphalerite is restricted to the mineral zone, predominantly as blebs in marcasite. The color of banded sphalerite ranged from nearly colorless to various hues of yellow. The replacement of banded sphalerite by marcasite was observed. The spheroidal sphalerite occurred in association with marcasite of euhedral habit. The spherules were small, the largest no greater than 1 mm across. Where present in great pro- fusion, the sphalerite spherules merged together forming botryoidal surfaces. The euhedral sphalerite occurred in the voids of the sponge-like and stromatolitic dolostone below the mineral zone, and in a layer of soft laminated mud associated with the dolostone. The euhedral sphalerite was predominantly red-brown, and no crystals larger than 1 mm in maximum dimension were observed. OHIO J. SCI. 78(5): 272, 1978 Sphalerite was found in cavities in all RELATION TO HOST ROCK parts of Pugh Quarry. Along with mar- Where sphalerite occurred between casite (Parr and Chang 1977), it com- the bands of marcasite and the dolostone prised nearly all of the sulfide mineraliza- host rock, replacement relationships could tion. Sphalerite occurred in three dis- be observed between the two. Dolomite tinct types. The banded sphalreite par- rhombs were commonly observed to be tially replaced by marcasite was the most engulfed in the banded sphalerite.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineralogy of the Ape.X Washington County, Utah
    Geology and Mineralogy of the Ape.x Germanium-Gallium Mine, Washington County, Utah Geology and Mineralogy of the Apex Germanium-Gallium Mine, Washington County, Utah By LAWRENCE R. BERNSTEIN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1577 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1986 For sale by the Distribution Branch, Text Products Section U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett St. Alexandria, VA 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bernstein, Lawrence R. Geology and mineralogy of the Apex Germanium­ Gallium mine, Washington County, Utah (U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1577) Bibliography: p. 9 Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1577 1. Mines and mineral resources-Utah-Washington County. 2. Mineralogy-Utah-Washington County. 3. Geology-Utah-Wasington County. I. Title. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1577. QE75.B9 no. 1577 557.3 s 85-600355 [TN24. U8] [553' .09792'48] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Germanium and gallium 1 Apex Mine 1 Acknowledgments 3 Methods 3 Geologic setting 3 Regional geology 3 Local geology 3 Ore geology 4 Mineralogy 5 Primary ore 5 Supergene ore 5 Discussion and conclusions 7 Primary ore deposition 7. Supergene alteration 8 Implications 8 References 8 FIGURES 1. Map showing location of Apex Mine and generalized geology of surrounding region 2 2. Photograph showing main adit of Apex Mine and gently dipping beds of the Callville Limestone 3 3. Geologic map showing locations of Apex and Paymaster mines and Apex fault zone 4 4. Scanning electron photomicrograph showing plumbian jarosite crystals from the 1,601-m level, Apex Mine 6 TABLES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Type Mineralogy of Africa Florias Mees Geology
    An overview of the type mineralogy of Africa Florias Mees Geology Department, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren Summary Out of the ca. 5500 valid mineral species that are currently known, about 400 have been initially described for localities in Africa. The first new mineral descriptions for this continent date from the late 18th century, but significant numbers have only been reached from the early 20th century onward. Up to now, the largest numbers of new species have been described for Namibia, the DR Congo, and South Africa, with a considerable lead over all other countries. In this overview of the type mineralogy of Africa, regional variations and the history of new mineral descriptions are covered, combined with a discussion of some general aspects of mineral species validity and mineral nomenclature, based on examples from Africa. Samenvatting – Een overzicht van de type mineralogie van Afrika Van de ca. 5500 geldige mineraalsoorten die momenteel gekend zijn, werden er ongeveer 400 voor het eerst beschreven voor vindplaatsen in Afrika. De eerste beschrijvingen van nieuwe mineralen voor dit continent dateren van het einde van de 18e eeuw, maar significante aantallen werden pas bereikt vanaf het begin van de 20e eeuw. Tot op heden werden de grootste aantallen nieuwe soorten beschreven voor Namibië, de DR Congo, en Zuid-Afrika, met aanzienlijke voorsprong op alle andere landen. In dit overzicht van de type mineralogie van Afrika worden regionale verschillen en de geschiedenis van de beschrijving van nieuwe mineralen overlopen, samen met een bespreking van enkele algemene aspecten van de geldigheid van mineraalsoorten en van de naamgeving van mineralen, aan de hand van voorbeelden uit Afrika.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distinction Between Enargite and Famatinite (Luzonite) G
    THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ENARGITE AND FAMATINITE (LUZONITE) G. Ar,aN Hancounr, Haraard Uniaersity, Cambridge,Mass. fNrnonucrrow For the past three years the writer has been working on the problem of studying minute samplesof ore minerals by a method combining the use of the quartz spectograph and the r-ray powder camera. The method is being developed as an adjunct to the optical study of ore minerals in polished sectionsl and it is particularly adapted to the study of minerals which occur habitually in fine intergrowths and whose identity and specific properties are in many casesuncertain. The pro- cedure involves excavating minute samples from very small areas in a polished section by means of an improved micro-drill, and utilizing them for powder photographs and spectographic analyses. In this way valu- able qualitative structural and chemical data are obtained for com- parison with the usual charactersobserved in polished sections. TnB Mrcno-DRTLL The drill used in the present work was patterned after that described by Haycock (1931). This consistsof a 1/50 H.P. electric motor con- nected by means of a flexible cable to a rigidly mounted spindle which holds the drill (Fig. 1). The drill point is simply a No. 7 Sharp needle mounted in a pin vise chuck and supported close to the drilling point by a bearing. The spindle and drill are mounted rigidly in a frame in an inclined position so that the point of the needle is in the center of the field of the microscope when a polished section is in focus. The inclina- tion of the spindle and drill is governed by the focal length and outside diameter of the objective used, leaving sufficient clearance so that the section may be brought into focus when it is lowered out of contact with the drill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geochemistry of Gold-Bearing and Gold-Free Pyrite and Marcasite from the Getchell Gold Deposit, Humboldt County, Nevada
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2001 The geochemistry of gold-bearing and gold-free pyrite and marcasite from the Getchell gold deposit, Humboldt County, Nevada Kelli Diane Weaver University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Weaver, Kelli Diane, "The geochemistry of gold-bearing and gold-free pyrite and marcasite from the Getchell gold deposit, Humboldt County, Nevada" (2001). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1344. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/rwv9-1zgy This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UM! films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]