DOCSLIB.ORG

The Geochemistry of Gold-Bearing and Gold-Free Pyrite and Marcasite from the Getchell Gold Deposit, Humboldt County, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Geochemistry of Gold-Bearing and Gold-Free Pyrite and Marcasite from the Getchell Gold Deposit, Humboldt County, Nevada UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2001 The geochemistry of gold-bearing and gold-free pyrite and marcasite from the Getchell gold deposit, Humboldt County, Nevada Kelli Diane Weaver University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Weaver, Kelli Diane, "The geochemistry of gold-bearing and gold-free pyrite and marcasite from the Getchell gold deposit, Humboldt County, Nevada" (2001). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1344. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/rwv9-1zgy This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UM! films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Artx)r, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0000 UMI' Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE GEOCHEMISTRY OF GOLD-BEARING AND GOLD-FREE PYRTTE AND MARCASITE FROM THE GETCHELL GOLD DEPOSIT, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA by Kelli D. W eaver Bachelor of Science Ohio Wesleyan University 1992 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Degree Department of Geoscience College of Sciences Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas November 2001 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number 1409054 UMI UMI Microform 1409054 Copyright 2002 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Leaming Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Thesis Approval UNTV The Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas November 21 2001 The Thesis prepared by Kelli D. Weaver- Entitled The Geochemistry of Gold-bearing and Gold-free Pyrite and Marcasite from the Getchell Gold Deposit, Humboldt County, Nevada is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science ____________________________________ i . H Exiiminatum Coniimttee Chair Dean of the Graduate Cotkge W#" A v Examination Committee Member V g ( ___ Examination Committee It^einber Cradnate College Faculty Reprefentative PR/101-53/H«) 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT The Geochemistry of Gold-Bearing and Gold-Aee Pyrite and Marcasite from the Getchell Gold Deposit; Humboldt County, Nevada by Kelli D. Weaver Dr. Jean S. Cline, Examination Committee Chair Professor of Geoscience University of Nevada, Las Vegas Pétrographie and geochemical investigations of pyrite and marcasite from the Getchell Carlin-type gold deposit show that elevated concentrations of a characteristic suite of trace metals correlate with ore-stage pyrite morphology. Secondary ion mass spectrometry analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between As and Au in ore-stage Fe-sulfide minerals. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy analyses revealed that gold-bearing Fe-sulfide crystals are arsenic-rich marcasite, rather than pyrite. These analyses failed to identify gold as microinclusions in ore-stage pyrite/ marcasite, and support the conclusion that gold is present in solid solution. Analyses reflect the chemistry of fluids responsible for precipitation of the pyrite and marcasite. Near stoichiometric, pre-ore pyrite precipitated fi'om fluids tfiat were not saturated in Hg, Tl, As, Cu, Au and Sb. Ore-stage pyrite textures suggest rapid precipitation ftom fluids that contained Tl, As, Cu, Au and Sb. Late-ore stage marcasite indicates that late fluids continued to transport significant As. m Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...........................................................................................................................iü LISTOFHCURES................................................................................................................. vi LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................ viü ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 CARLIN-TYPE GOLD DEPOSITS..................................................................4 Characteristics of Carlin-Type Gold Deposits ........................................................... 4 CHAPTER 3 THE GETCHELL GOLD DEPOSIT................................................................. 7 Location and General Regional Geology ..................................................................7 Getchell Stratigraphy ................................................................................................ 9 Granodiorite Intrusion............................................................................................ 12 Structural Controls of the Getchell Au Deposit..................................................... 13 Carlin-Type Gold Mineralization at Getchell ......................................................... 13 CHAPTER 4 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS............................................ 16 Pétrographie Analyses ............................................................................................ 18 Electron Microprobe Analyses ................................................................................ 18 Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry ..........................................................................19 High-Resolution Transmission Microscopy ........................................................... 21 Cathodoluminescence ............................................................................................. 22 Statistical Analysis .................................................................................................. 22 CHAPTER 5 MINERAL PARAGENESIS...........................................................................23 Stage 1 — Pre-Ore Stage Mineral Assemblage ........................................................ 24 Discussion of Pre-Ore Paragenesis.........................................................................31 Stage 2 - Ore-Stage Mineral Assemblage ...............................................................31 Discussion of Ore-Stagp Paragenesis ......................................................................44 Stage 3 - Late-Ore Stage Mineral Assemblage ....................................................... 46 Discussion of Late-Ore Stage Paragenesis .............................................................. 56 IV Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER 6 TRACE ELEMENT STUDY AND STATISTICAL EVALUATION.............. 61 Pyrite Geochemistry ..................................................................................................61 Discussion of Trace Element Analyses.................................................................... 69 Statistical Analysis of Sulfide Geochemistry ........................................................... 70 C luster Analysis of Sulfide Geochemistry ............................................................... 83 CHAPTER 7 GOLD QUANTIFICATION AND LOCATION...........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
    MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Alkali Pyroxenes and Amphiboles: a Window on Rare
    Alkali pyroxenes and amphiboles: a window on rare earth elements and other high field strength elements behavior through the magmatic-hydrothermal transition of peralkaline granitic systems Cyrielle Bernard, Guillaume Estrade, Stefano Salvi, Didier Béziat, Martin Smith To cite this version: Cyrielle Bernard, Guillaume Estrade, Stefano Salvi, Didier Béziat, Martin Smith. Alkali pyroxenes and amphiboles: a window on rare earth elements and other high field strength elements behavior through the magmatic-hydrothermal transition of peralkaline granitic systems. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, Springer Verlag, 2020, 10.1007/s00410-020-01723-y. hal-02989854 HAL Id: hal-02989854 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02989854 Submitted on 5 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Alkali pyroxenes and amphiboles: a window on Rare Earth Elements and other High Field Strength 2 Elements behavior through the magmatic-hydrothermal transition of peralkaline granitic systems 3 4 Cyrielle Bernarda, Guillaume Estradea⸸, Stefano Salvia, Didier Béziata , Martin Smithb 5 a GET, CNRS, UPS, Université de Toulouse III, Toulouse, France 6 b School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK 7 8 ⸸ Corresponding author: [email protected] 9 ORCID: 0000-0001-6907-7469 10 11 12 Acknowledgments 13 This work was supported by an INSU/TelluS grant from CNRS (French National Center for Scientific 14 Research).
    [Show full text]
  • Metacinnabar Hgs C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Metacinnabar HgS c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Cubic. Point Group: 43m. Commonly massive; rarely as small (to 1 mm) tetrahedral crystals having rough faces. Twinning: Common on {111}, forming lamellae in polished section. Physical Properties: Fracture: Subconchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 3 VHN = n.d. D(meas.) = 7.65 D(calc.) = 7.63 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Grayish black; in polished section, grayish white. Streak: Black. Luster: Metallic. Pleochroism: Weak, rarely. Anisotropism: Very weak, rarely. R: (400) 28.4, (420) 27.6, (440) 26.8, (460) 26.3, (480) 25.9, (500) 25.6, (520) 25.4, (540) 25.2, (560) 25.1, (580) 25.0, (600) 24.9, (620) 24.9, (640) 24.8, (660) 24.7, (680) 24.7, (700) 24.7 Cell Data: Space Group: F 43m. a = 5.8717(5) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. 3.378 (100), 2.068 (55), 1.7644 (45), 2.926 (35), 1.3424 (12), 1.6891 (10), 1.3085 (10) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) (4) Hg 79.73 67.45 81.33 86.22 Zn 4.23 3.10 Cd 11.72 Fe trace 0.2 Se 1.08 6.49 S 14.58 15.63 10.30 13.78 Total 99.62 98.10 98.12 100.00 (1) Guadalc´azar,Mexico; corresponds to (Hg0.85Zn0.14)Σ=0.99(S0.97Se0.03)Σ=1.00. (2) Uland area, Russia; corresponds to (Hg0.69Cd0.21Zn0.10Fe0.01)Σ=1.01S1.00. (3) San Onofre, Mexico; corresponds to Hg1.00(S0.80Se0.20)Σ=1.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupled Substitution of H and Minor Elements in Rutile and The
    American Mineralogist, Volume 78, pages I 181-1I9I, 1993 Coupled substitution of H and minor elementsin rutile and the implications of high OH contentsin Nb- and Cr-rich rutile from the upper mantle DrvrrrnrosVr-lssopour,os S. S. Papadopulosand Associates,Inc.,7944 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda,Maryland 20814-3620,U.S.A. Gponcn R. Rossnn.q,N Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences,California Institute of Technology,Pasadena, California 91125, U.S.A. SrnpHrN E. Hlccrnry Department of Geology, University of Massachusetts,Amherst, Massachusetts01003, U.S.A. Ansrucr Infrared absorption spectraof rutile crystals from a variety of geologicalenvironments (carbonatite,hydrothermal vein, kyanite * rutile + lazulite association,xenoliths that are kimberlite hosted and dominated by Nb- and Cr-rich rutile) exhibit strong absorption in the 3300-cm-' regtrondue to interstitial protons bonded to structure O. In general the proton is located at sites slightly displaced from t/zYz0of the unit cell, although some samplesshow evidenceofadditional protons at tetrahedral interstitial sites.H contents of rutile range up to 0.8 rvto/oHrO, the highest concentrations occurring in mantle-derived Nb- and Cr-rich rutile of metasomatic origin. The role of H in rutile was examined, particularly with respect to its relations to other impurities. Protons are present in the rutile structure to compensatefor trivalent substitutional cations (Cr, Fe, V, Al), which are only partly compensatedby pentavalent ions (Nb, Ta). The possibility of using the H content of rutile as a geohygrometeris illustrated for the caseof coexisting hematite and rutile. INrnonucrroN crystalsto an OH stretch mode. The study by von Hippel (1962) pro- Rutile is known to have a greal affinity for H, and et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores
    A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment 2 cm Sample of spheroidal sphalerite with dendritic sphalerite, galena, and iron sulfides (pyrite plus marcasite) from the Pomorzany mine. Note the “up direction” is indicated by “snow-on-the-roof” texture of galena and Scientificsphalerite Investigations alnong colloform Report layers of2010–5070–A light-colored spahlerite. Hydrothermal sulfide clasts in the left center of the sample are encrusted by sphalerire and iron sulfides. Size of sample is 20x13 cm. Photo by David Leach. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Sample of spheroidal sphalerite with dendritic sphalerite, galena, and iron sulfides (pyrite plus mar- casite) from Pomorzany mine. Note the “up direction” is indicated by “snow-on-the-roof” texture of galena and sphalerite along colloform layers of light-colored sphalerite. Hydrothermal sulfide clasts in the left center of the sample are encrusted by sphalerite and iron sulfides. Size of sample is 20x13 centimeters. (Photograph by David L. Leach, U.S. Geological Survey.) A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley- Type Lead-Zinc Ores By David L. Leach, Ryan D. Taylor, David L. Fey, Sharon F. Diehl, and Richard W. Saltus Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrite's Evil Twin Marcasite and Pyrite Are Two Common Minerals. Both Fes2 Chemically, Making Them Polymorphs. Polym
    Marcasite - Pyrite's Evil Twin Marcasite and pyrite are two common minerals. Both FeS2 chemically, making them polymorphs. Polymorphs are minerals with the same chemical composition but different crystal structures. Diamond and graphite are polymorphs, both minerals being pure carbon. In diamond and graphite the different arrangement of carbon atoms gives these two minerals of very different physical properties. Pyrite and marcasite, on the other hand, have almost identical physical properties, making them tough to tell from each other. Let's go through their properties. Both are metallic and pale yellow to brassy yellow. Both can tarnish and be iridescent. Both are 6-6.5 on the Mohs' hardness scale. Neither have a particularly prominent cleavage, although marcasite does have one that occasionally shows up. Both have densities of about 5 grams per cubic centimeter (pyrite is a bit denser, but not enough to be detectible without delicate measurements). They can even be found together in the same rock. Fortunately these minerals often show good outer crystal shapes that are quite different. Pyrite crystals are generally equant, and dominated by cubes, octahedrons and 12-sided pyritohedrons. Marcasite crystals are usually rectangular (tabular) with wedge-shaped ends and tend to form in star shaped, radiating or cockscomb groups. Marcasite is also much more restricted in occurrence than pyrite, forming only in low temperature, near surface, very acidic environments. It is found in some ore deposits, in sediments formed under somewhat stagnant conditions and as ground water precipitates in rocks such as in limestone and shale. Although pyrite can also be found in many of these same environments, the crystal shapes are diagnostic.
    [Show full text]
  • Ity of Minerais with the Pyrite, Marcasite
    STRUCTURALSTABI!.ITY OF MINERAISWITH THE PYRITE, MARCASITE,ARSENOPYRITE AND L6ILINGITESTRUCTURES ERNEST H. NICKEL M,ineral Sc'iencesD'i,v,is,ion, M,ines Branch, Departrnentof Energy, M.i,nesand, Resowrces, 6id Booth Street,Ottawa, Canad,a AssrRAcr The structural stabilities of the disulphides, diarsenides and sulpharsenides of iron, cobalt and nickel are explained on thi basis of ligand field theory. ihe structural stabilities can be correlated with the number of non-bonding d elecirons of the metal atom in the structure, and can.be explained by the tenden"yif th" .ornpourrd" to form structures in which maximum electron spin-pairing takes place. The pyrite,structure, which is favoured-by -!tub with six or more non-bonding d electrons, and which includes pyrite, cattierite, vaesite, cobaltite gur"aormt"i i, characterized by metal-sulphur oclahedra joined at corneis, with no apparintlnteraction""a between the d electrons of neighbouring metal atoms. The otiei structures are all characterized by shared octahedral edgesalong one direction, so that the metal atoms are brought into.relatively close proximlty. In-the marcasite structure, which includes marcasite and rammelsbergite, both with six non-bonding d electrons, the metal atoms repel each other because of completely filled tzs levek. In dre arsenopyrite structure, whichjncludes arsenopyrite and siffiorite, both oi which havefrve iJ eleciions that do noi participate.in metal-sulphur londing, pairs of metals are drawn together to permit spin- pairing of the odd electrons. In ldllingite, in which the iron atom islssumed io have iour non-bonding-d electrons, the d orbitals in.the a crystallographic direction are emptied, permitting close iron-iron approachesin this direciion, r"-wull as complete of the electrons in the two remaining ,2sorbitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive Mineralogy of Pugh Quarry, Northwestern Ohio: Sphalerite1
    Copyright © 1978 Ohio Acad. Sci. 0030-0950/78/0005-027211.50/0 DESCRIPTIVE MINERALOGY OF PUGH QUARRY, NORTHWESTERN OHIO: SPHALERITE1 DAVID F. PARR2 and LUKE L. Y. CHANG, Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 Abstract. The Devonian rocks at Pugh Quarry have three distinct types of sphalerite (banded massive, spheroidal, and tiny euhedral). Occurrence of the banded massive sphalerite is restricted to the mineral zone, predominantly as blebs in marcasite. The color of banded sphalerite ranged from nearly colorless to various hues of yellow. The replacement of banded sphalerite by marcasite was observed. The spheroidal sphalerite occurred in association with marcasite of euhedral habit. The spherules were small, the largest no greater than 1 mm across. Where present in great pro- fusion, the sphalerite spherules merged together forming botryoidal surfaces. The euhedral sphalerite occurred in the voids of the sponge-like and stromatolitic dolostone below the mineral zone, and in a layer of soft laminated mud associated with the dolostone. The euhedral sphalerite was predominantly red-brown, and no crystals larger than 1 mm in maximum dimension were observed. OHIO J. SCI. 78(5): 272, 1978 Sphalerite was found in cavities in all RELATION TO HOST ROCK parts of Pugh Quarry. Along with mar- Where sphalerite occurred between casite (Parr and Chang 1977), it com- the bands of marcasite and the dolostone prised nearly all of the sulfide mineraliza- host rock, replacement relationships could tion. Sphalerite occurred in three dis- be observed between the two. Dolomite tinct types. The banded sphalreite par- rhombs were commonly observed to be tially replaced by marcasite was the most engulfed in the banded sphalerite.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods Used to Identifying Minerals
    METHODS USED TO IDENTIFYING MINERALS More than 4,000 minerals are known to man, and they are identified by their physical and chemical properties. The physical properties of minerals are determined by the atomic structure and crystal chemistry of the minerals. The most common physical properties are crystal form, color, hardness, cleavage, and specific gravity. CRYSTALS One of the best ways to identify a mineral is by examining its crystal form (external shape). A crystal is defined as a homogenous solid possessing a three-dimensional internal order defined by the lattice structure. Crystals developed under favorable conditions often exhibit characteristic geometric forms (which are outward expressions of the internal arrangements of atoms), crystal class, and cleavage. Large, well- developed crystals are not common because of unfavorable growth conditions, but small crystals recognizable with a hand lens or microscope are common. Minerals that show no external crystal form but possess an internal crystalline structure are said to be massive. A few minerals, such as limonite and opal, have no orderly arrangement of atoms and are said to be amorphous. Crystals are divided into six major classes based on their geometric form: isometric, tetragonal, hexagonal, orthorhombic, monoclinic, and triclinic. The hexagonal system also has a rhombohedral subdivision, which applies mainly to carbonates. CLEAVAGE AND FRACTURE After minerals are formed, they have a tendency to split or break along definite planes of weakness. This property is called cleavage. These planes of weakness are closely related to the internal structure of the mineral, and are usually, but not always, parallel to crystal faces or possible crystal faces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineralogy of Warsaw Formation Geodes
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 66 Annual Issue Article 47 1959 The Mineralogy of Warsaw Formation Geodes Richard B. Tripp U.S. Geological Survey Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1959 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Tripp, Richard B. (1959) "The Mineralogy of Warsaw Formation Geodes," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 66(1), 350-356. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol66/iss1/47 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tripp: The Mineralogy of Warsaw Formation Geodes The Mineralogy of Warsaw Formation Geodes By RICHARD B. TRIPP Abstract. Mineral inclusions found in geodes from the Warsaw formation of southeastern Iowa are described. The following are reported as present: quartz, chalcedony, calcite, dolomite, ankerite, barite, aragonite, smithsonite, iron pyrite, marcasite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, sulfur, goethite, hematite, pyrolusite, kaolinite, malachite, selenite, and limonite. Tenorite and chalcocite have been tentatively identified. The geodes found in the Warsaw formation of southeastern Iowa and adjacent areas present a number of interesting mineralogical in­ clusions, many not previously described in the literature. For the past ten years an intensive study has been made of the mineral inclu­ sions found in geodes collected from thirty-two different exposures in the Keokuk, Iowa, area.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability and Solid Solutions of Hydrous Alumino-Silicates in the Earth’S Mantle
    minerals Article Stability and Solid Solutions of Hydrous Alumino-Silicates in the Earth’s Mantle Wendy R. Panero 1,* and Razvan Caracas 2,3 1 School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 2 CNRS, Laboratoire de Geologie de Lyon, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 69364 Lyon, France; [email protected] 3 The Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, Postbox 1028 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 February 2020; Accepted: 28 March 2020; Published: 8 April 2020 Abstract: The degree to which the Earth’s mantle stores and cycles water in excess of the storage capacity of nominally anhydrous minerals is dependent upon the stability of hydrous phases under mantle-relevant pressures, temperatures, and compositions. Two hydrous phases, phase D and phase H, are stable to the pressures and temperatures of the Earth’s lower mantle, suggesting that the Earth’s lower mantle may participate in the cycling of water. We build on our prior work of density functional theory calculations on phase H with the stability, structure, and bonding of hydrous phases D, and we predict the aluminum partitioning with H in the Al2O3-SiO2-MgO-H2O system. We address the solid solutions through a statistical sampling of site occupancy and calculation of the partition function from the grand canonical ensemble. We show that each phase has a wide solid solution series between MgSi2O6H2-Al2SiO6H2 and MgSiO4H2-2dAlOOH + SiO2, in which phase H is more aluminum rich than phase D at a given bulk composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrothermal Mineralization of the Mississippi Valley Type at the Martin-Marietta Quarry, Linn County, Iowa
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Northern Iowa Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 91 Number Article 7 1984 Hydrothermal Mineralization of the Mississippi Valley Type at the Martin-Marietta Quarry, Linn County, Iowa Paul L. Garvin Cornell College Copyright ©1984 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Garvin, Paul L. (1984) "Hydrothermal Mineralization of the Mississippi Valley Type at the Martin-Marietta Quarry, Linn County, Iowa," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 91(2), 70-75. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol91/iss2/7 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Garvin: Hydrothermal Mineralization of the Mississippi Valley Type at the Proc. IowaAcad. Sci. 91(2): 70-75, 1984 Hydrothermal Mineralization of the Mississippi Valley Type at the Martin-Marietta Quarry, Linn County, Iowa PAUL L. GARVIN Department of Geology Cornell College Mount Vernon, Iowa A hydrothermal sulfide mineral deposit is exposed at the Martin-Marietta Quarry (MMQ) near Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Mineralization occurs along solution-enlarged vertical joints in host rocks of the Silurian Scotch Grove and Gower formations. The hydrothermal minerals in general order of deposition are: marcasite, pyrite, sphalerite, calcite. Wall rock alteration is not extensive, and consists of solution enlargement of joints and dissemination of microscopic marcasite in the host rock.
    [Show full text]