DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Map of East Tennessee with Explanatory Text

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF GEOLOGY BULLETIN 58, PART II Geologic Map of East Tennessee With Explanatory Text Compiled by JOHN RODGERS Geologist, U. S. Geological Survey with the Collaboration of Geologists of the Tennessee Division of Geology Tennessee Valley Authority and United States Geological Survey Prepared under the Joint Auspices of the United States Geological Survey and the Tennessee Division of Geology Nashville, Tennessee 1953 Reprinted 1993 STATE OF TENNESSEE FRANK G. CLEMENT, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Jim McCORD, Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGY W. D. HARDEMAN, State Geologist 1993 STATE OF TENNESSEE Ned McWherter Governor DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION J. W. Luna Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGY Edward T. Luther State Geologist CONTENTS Page Abstract…………………………………………………...…………………………………………………1 Introduction ………………………………………………………...……………………………………… 3 Area covered by present map…………………………………………………………………...…………. 3 Compilation of the map ……………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Map units…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………………………….…. 8 Physical geography …...........…………………………………………………………........................…… 11 Regional setting .........................…............…………………………………………………….…. 11 Unaka Mountains .............................................……………………………………………….….. 11 Valley of East Tennessee ........................................………………………………………………. 14 Cumberland Plateau ..............................……………………………………………………….…. 16 Erosion surfaces ................................................………………………………………………….. 17 Description of rock units .............................................……………………………………………….…… 21 Pre-Cambrian crystalline complex …………………………………...............................…….….. 21 Mount Rogers volcanic group ….......................................…………………………………..…… 23 Ocoee series ....................................................………………………………………………….… 24 Name, subdivision .........................................……………………………………………. 24 Northeast of Pigeon River ……………………………………………………………..… 24 Southwest of Pigeon River, foothill belt……………………………………………….… 28 Southwest of Pigeon River, mountain belt…………………………………………..…… 31 General remarks………………………………………………………………………...… 33 Unicoi formation and Cochran conglomerate…………………………………………………...… 34 Hampton formation and Nichols shale………………………………………………………..…… 38 Erwin formation and equivalent rocks…………………………………………………………..… 39 Shady dolomite……………………………………………………………………………….….… 42 Rome formation……………………………………………………………………………….…… 43 Conasauga shale or Conasauga group…………………………………………………………...… 47 Name, contacts………………………………………………………………………….… 47 Northwestern phase: Conasauga shale………………………………………………….… 48 Central phase: Pumpkin Valley to Maynardville formations…………………………..… 49 Southeastern phase: Honaker dolomite, Nolichucky shale, and Maynardville limestone………………………………………………………………... 51 Knox dolomite or Knox group…………………………………………………………………….. 53 Name, subdivision………………………………………………………………………… 53 Northwestern phase: dominantly dolomite……………………………………………….. 55 Southeastern phase: dominantly limestone……………………………………………….. 61 Lower and middle parts of Chickamauga limestone and equivalent rocks………………………... 64 Present status of the stratigraphy of the Chickamauga limestone………………………… 64 Belt between the Saltville fault and the Knoxville and Rocky Valley faults (northwest part of Red Belt of Safford)…………………………………………. 68 Belt between the Knoxville and Rocky Valley faults and the Chestuee and Dumplin Valley faults (main Red Belt of Safford)………………………………...72 Belts southeast of the Chestuee and Dumplin Valley faults and of the Saltville fault northeast of Morristown (Gray Belt of Safford and lesser belts to southeast and southwest)……………………………………………….. 76 iii Page Belts between the Saltville fault and the Whiteoak Mountain and Hunter Valley faults (middle belts)…………………………………………………... 82 Belts northwest of the Whiteoak Mountain and Hunter Valley faults (northwestern belts)…………………………………………………………………… 87 Correlation beyond East Tennessee……………………………………………………… 90 Synthesis…………………………………………………………………………………. 92 Upper part of Chickamauga limestone and equivalent rocks…………………………………….. 94 Juniata formation and Sequatchie formation……………………………………………………... 97 Silurian and Lower Devonian rocks……………………………………………………………… 98 Chattanooga shale and other Devonian and basal Mississippian shale…………………………... 104 Grainger formation and Fort Payne chert………………………………………………………… 106 Newman limestone……………………………………………………………………………….. 108 Pennington formation…………………………………………………………………………….. 110 Pennsylvanian rocks……………………………………………………………………………… 113 Paleozoic intrusive rocks…………………………………………………………………………. 114 Unconsolidated mantle…………………………………………………………………………… 114 Residuum………………………………………………………………………………… 115 Locally transported mantle………………………………………………………………. 117 River alluvium…………………………………………………………………………… 118 Minor constituents of the mantle………………………………………………………… 119 Age…………………………………………………………………………………….… 120 Larger structural features………………………………………………………………………………….. 122 Unconformities and facies changes………………………………………………………………. 122 Folds and faults of the Cumberland Plateau and the Plateau front……………………………….. 126 Pine Mountain and Jacksboro faults……………………………………………………... 126 Sequatchie anticline, Emory River line, and related features……………………………. 127 Features along the Cumberland Plateau front……………………………………………. 128 Belt of dominant faulting…………………………………………………………………………. 130 Faults of the Kingston family……………………………………………………………. 130 Faults of the Whiteoak Mountain family………………………………………………… 131 Faults of the Saltville family…………………………………………………………….. 132 Belt of dominant folding…………………………………………………………………………. 134 Pulaski fault block………………………………………………………………………………... 136 Thrust sheets of the Unaka Mountains…………………………………………………………… 139 Folded thrust sheets of northeast Tennessee…………………………………………….. 139 Folded thrust sheets of the French Broad area…………………………………………... 143 Faulted thrust sheets of the Great Smoky Mountains……………………………………. 145 Source materials and outstanding future projects…………………………………………………………. 149 Plate 1, Briceville..……………………………………………………………………………….. 149 Plate 2, Maynardville…………………………………………………………………………….. 149 Plate 3, Morristown………………………………………………………………………………. 150 Plate 4, Greeneville………………………………………………………………………………. 151 Plate 5, Roan Mountain…………………………………………………………………………... 151 Plate 6, Cranberry………………………………………………………………………………… 152 Plate 7, Kingston………………………………………………………………………………….. 152 Plate 8, Loudon…………………………………………………………………………………… 153 Plate 9, Knoxville………………………………………………………………………………… 153 Plate 10, Mount Guyot……………………………………………………………………………. 154 Plate 11, Asheville………………………………………………………………………………... 154 Plate 12, Chattanooga……………………………………………………………………………. 155 iv Page Plate 13, Cleveland………………………………………………………………………..155 Plate 14, Murphy………………………………………………………………………….156 List of outstanding projects for future geologic mapping in East Tennessee……………………………………………………………………………….156 References cited………………………………………………………………………………………….…163 v ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES Page 1-14. Geologic map of East Tennessee…………………………….…see Map Container or Folio 15. Geologic cross sections maps of East Tennessee………………see Map Container or Folio FIGURE 1. Index map to plates of Geologic map of East Tennessee……………………………….….4 2. The north face of the Great Smoky Mountains as viewed from Fighting Creek Gap………………………………………………………………….……………....19 3. Facies relationships in the Conasauga group and equivalent rocks in East Tennessee and southwest Virginia………………………………………………………....46 4. Facies relationships In Middle and Upper Ordovician rocks near the 84th meridian in East Tennessee………………………………………….…....see end of text 5. Main structural features of East Tennessee……………………………………see end of text 6. Index map of source materials used in compiling Geologic map of East Tennessee…………………………………………………………………………....148 7. Index map of projects for future geologic mapping in East Tennessee………………..…157 TABLES TABLE Page 1. Sequences of units used in published folios for the Ocoee series and Immediately overlying rocks……………………………………………………….……...25 2. Subdivisions of the Ocoee series used on present map……………………………………26 3. Formations of the Chilhowee group……………………………………………………….35 4. Formations of the Conasauga group (central phase)………………………………………50 5. Subdivisions of the Knox group used on present map…………………………………….56 6. Subdivisions of Silurian and Lower Devonian rocks used on present map……………….99 vi Geologic Map of East Tennessee With Explanatory Text ABSTRACT A new geologic map of the Unaka Mountains and the Valley of East Tennessee, compiled from all available sources, is presented herewith. The accompanying text describes the rock units shown on the map. The oldest rocks present form a pre-Cambrian crystalline complex, part of the southwest end of the Blue Ridge welt of such rocks. These igneous and metamorphic rocks were already crystalline before the end of pre-Cambrian time, but they were again deformed, with the production of thrust faults and accompanying mylonite zones, at the time of deformation of the overlying Paleozoic rocks. Above this basement complex lies the immensely thick Ocoee series (perhaps 5 miles thick), composed of detrital rocks of graywacke type; these were deposited after the formation of the crystalline complex and may be of late pre-Cambrian age or possibly younger. Overlying the Ocoee series is a sequence of somewhat better sorted detrital
Recommended publications
  • Description of the Estillville Sheet

    Description of the Estillville Sheet

    DESCRIPTION OF THE ESTILLVILLE SHEET. GEOGRAPHY. ward across the States of Illinois and Indiana. course to the Ohio. South of Chattanooga the ment among the high points on Wallin Ridge, the Its eastern boundary is sharply defined by the streams flow directly to the Gulf of Mexico. even crest of Stone Mountain, and the summit of General relations. The territory represented Alleghany front and ..the Cumberland escarp­ Topography of the Appalachian province. The Powell Mountain west of Slemp Gap. Beyond by the Estillville atlas sheet is one-quarter of a ment. The rocks of this division are almost different divisions of the province vary much in Big Black Mountain, with its irregular crest, is square degree of the earth's surface, extending entirely of sedimentary origin, and remain very character of topography, as do also different por­ the even summit of Pine Mountain, planed down from latitude 36° 30' on the south to 37° on the nearly horizontal. The character of the surface, tions of the same division. This variation of top­ to the general height of the valley ridges. The north, and from longitude 82° 30' on the east to which is dependent on the character and attitude ographic forms is due to several conditions, which peneplain was originally very nearly horizontal, 83° on the west. Its average width is 27.7 miles, of the rocks, is that of a plateau more or less com­ either prevail at present or have prevailed in the but it has been tilted, so that now it varies in ele­ its length is 34.5 miles, and its area is 956.6 pletely worn down.
  • May 9–13, 2017 Programming Schedule

    May 9–13, 2017 Programming Schedule

    May 9–13, 2017 Programming Schedule *ALL SCHEDULES SUBJECT TO CHANGE* The FARMERS’ MARKET, WORKSHOPS, SEMINARS/PRESENTATIONS and OUTDOOR EXCURSION SIGN– UPS will take place at: LeConte Center at Pigeon Forge 2986 Teaster Lane Pigeon Forge, TN 37863 Wilderness Wildlife Week’s 2nd Appalachian Homecoming featuring storytelling, music, antique tractor show, non–profit picnic fundraiser and more will begin at 5 PM on Friday, May 12th at: Patriot Park 186 Old Mill Avenue Pigeon Forge, TN 37863 LeConte Center Hours Information Desk: Open Tuesday to Thursday, from 7 AM – 9 PM Information Desk: Open Friday, from 7 AM – 4:30 PM Information Desk: Open Saturday, from 7 AM – 8 PM Farmers’ Market Hours: Open Tuesday thru Saturday from 8:30 AM – 2:30 PM Pre–registration Desk: Open Tuesday thru Saturday from 8 AM – 3 PM Pre–registration for LIMITED! Sessions will take the morning of each day for that day’s sessions Vendor/Exhibit Hall: Open daily from 9 AM – 6 PM in LeConte Exhibit Hall *Note: Vendor Hall will close at 4 PM on Friday, May 12. Photography Exhibit opens Tuesday, May 9 from 2 PM to 6 PM. Hours for Wednesday, May 10 until Saturday, May 13 from 9 AM until 6 PM. Photography Exhibit Special Hours: Friday, May 12 from 9 AM until 4 PM. Education Stations located in LeConte Hall. 1 Tuesday, May 9 9 AM: Tuesday Outdoor Excursion Sign-ups – Greenbrier Hall A 9 – 10 AM: NEW! Guiding in the National Parks and Wilderness Areas of the United States: Chris Hoge – North 1 9 – 11 AM: NEW! LIMITED! Design Your Own Bird Greeting Cards: Louise Bales – North 3B Limit 10 Participants must preregister at Registration Table for all LIMITED! sessions.
  • Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval

    Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2018 Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent Forrest Dalton McFarlin University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation McFarlin, Forrest Dalton, "Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2952. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2952 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Forrest Dalton McFarlin Texas Christian University Bachelor of Science in Geology, 2015 August 2018 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. _____________________________________ Walter Manger, PhD Thesis Director _____________________________________ Adriana Potra, PhD Committee Member _____________________________________ Thomas McGilvery, PhD Committee Member ©2018 by Forrest Dalton McFarlin All Rights Reserved Abstract The Lower Mississippian interval comprises a single, third-order, eustatic cycle subdivided lithostratigraphically into the St. Joe Limestone (Hopkins 1893) and overlying Boone Formation (Branner 1891, Simonds 1891) with type areas in northern Arkansas.
  • Bedrock Geology of Altenburg Quadrangle, Jackson County

    Bedrock Geology of Altenburg Quadrangle, Jackson County

    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF ALTENBURG QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W. Shilts, Executive Director JACKSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND PERRY COUNTY, MISSOURI STATEMAP Altenburg-BG ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY E. Donald McKay III, Interim Director Mary J. Seid, Joseph A. Devera, Allen L. Weedman, and Dewey H. Amos 2009 360 GEOLOGIC UNITS ) ) ) 14 Qal Alluvial deposits ) 13 18 Quaternary Pleistocene and Holocene 17 360 ) 15 360 16 14 0 36 ) 13 Qf Fan deposits ) Unconformity Qal ) & 350 tl Lower Tradewater Formation Atokan ) ) Pennsylvanian 360 ) &cv Caseyville Formation Morrowan 24 360 ) Unconformity ) 17 Upper Elviran undivided, Meu ) Waltersburg to top of Degonia 19 20 Qal 21 22 23 ) 24 ) Mv Vienna Limestone 360 o ) 3 Mts ) 350 Mts Tar Springs Sandstone ) 20 360 ) Mgd 360 30 ) Mgd Glen Dean Limestone ) 21 350 360 Mts 29 ) Qal Hardinsburg Sandstone and J N Mhg Chesterian ) Golconda Formations h Æ Qal Mav anc 28 27 Br ) N oJ 26 25 JN 85 N ) Cypress Sandstone through J Mcpc Dsl 500 Paint Creek Formation JN N ) J o Mts N 5 J s ) Dgt 600 J N 70 J N Mgd Yankeetown Formation s ) Myr Db 80 28 Æ and Renault Sandstone N J 29 N J N ) Sb J Mgd Mississippian o Dgt Ssc 25 Clines o N 25 Msg 27 ) Qal J 80 s 3 Mav Aux Vases Sandstone N J N Mts o MILL J MISSISSIPPI 34 ) Qal J N ) N J Dsl 35 N 26 J o N 25 J Mgd Mgd ) Msg Ste. Genevieve Limestone 500 o Db DITCH J 20 Mgd N N N ) J J o RIVER o N 600 J 80 N ) 10 o J Mav Æ Msl St.
  • Blue Ridge Anticlinorium in Central Virginia

    Blue Ridge Anticlinorium in Central Virginia

    VILLARD S. GRIFFIN, JR. Department of Chemistry and Geology, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29631 Fabric Relationships Across the Catoctin Mountain- Blue Ridge Anticlinorium in Central Virginia ABSTRACT a subhorizontal northeast-bearing lineation. A diagram of poles to mica cleavages defines Study of planar and linear subfabrics across a subfabric characterized by a complete girdle the Catoctin Mountain-Blue Ridge anticlin- similar to the s-pole T-girdle, but having a orium in central Virginia suggests distinct /3 pole bearing 17 degrees closer to due north. differences in the kinematic history of the The Catoctin Mountain-Blue Ridge anti- core and flanks of the anticlinorium. The clinorium in central Virginia is similar to its Precambrian basement complex gneisses in extension in Maryland and Pennsylvania and the core of the anticlinorium record the possesses the same cleavage and foliation fan effects of penetrative deformation in the a evident in the anticlinorium there. The anti- direction. Maxima of mica cleavage poles clinorium in central Virginia, however, has form a complete girdle subnormal to the fewer similarities with the Grandfather pronounced down-dip lineation of elongated Mountain Window area southwestward in minerals. Northeast-striking foliation pro- North Carolina. Like the rocks in the Window duces well-defined maxima that have a poorly area, the Precambrian basement rocks in the developed partial ir-girdle. anticlinorium are profoundly deformed Piedmont rocks in the James River syn- cataclastically and have a pronounced cata- clinorium, on the eastern limb of the Catoctin clastic a lineation. Unlike the rocks in the Mountain-Blue Ridge anticlinorium have an Window area, those in the Piedmont part of s-surface pattern somewhat similar to that of the anticlinorium do not have a pronounced the basement gneisses, but with a better de- cataclastic fabric.
  • Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park Meghan Lindsey University of South Florida, Mlcook3@Usf.Edu

    Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park Meghan Lindsey University of South Florida, [email protected]

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Tampa Library Faculty and Staff ubP lications Tampa Library 2008 Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park Meghan Lindsey University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tlib_facpub Part of the Education Commons Scholar Commons Citation Lindsey, Meghan, "Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park" (2008). Tampa Library Faculty and Staff Publications. 1. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tlib_facpub/1 This Data is brought to you for free and open access by the Tampa Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tampa Library Faculty and Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SSACgnp.RA776.ML1.1 Let’s Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park How many Calories will you burn off hiking a five-mile loop trail? Core Quantitative Literacy Topics Slope; contour maps Core Geoscience Subject Topographic maps Supporting Quantitative Literacy Topics Unit Conversions Arctangent, radians Reading Graphs Image from: http://www.nps.gov/cato Ratios and Proportions Percent increase Meghan Lindsey Department of Geology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620 © 2008 University of South Florida Libraries. All rights reserved. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number NSF DUE-0836566. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. 1 Getting started After completing this module you should be able to: • use Excel spreadsheet to make your calculations.
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia

    IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia

    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
  • Scenic Landforms of Virginia

    Scenic Landforms of Virginia

    Vol. 34 August 1988 No. 3 SCENIC LANDFORMS OF VIRGINIA Harry Webb . Virginia has a wide variety of scenic landforms, such State Highway, SR - State Road, GWNF.R(T) - George as mountains, waterfalls, gorges, islands, water and Washington National Forest Road (Trail), JNFR(T) - wind gaps, caves, valleys, hills, and cliffs. These land- Jefferson National Forest Road (Trail), BRPMP - Blue forms, some with interesting names such as Hanging Ridge Parkway mile post, and SNPMP - Shenandoah Rock, Devils Backbone, Striped Rock, and Lovers Leap, National Park mile post. range in elevation from Mt. Rogers at 5729 feet to As- This listing is primarily of those landforms named on sateague and Tangier islands near sea level. Two nat- topographic maps. It is hoped that the reader will advise ural lakes occur in Virginia, Mountain Lake in Giles the Division of other noteworthy landforms in the st& County and Lake Drummond in the City of Chesapeake. that are not mentioned. For those features on private Gaps through the mountains were important routes for land always obtain the owner's permission before vis- early settlers and positions for military movements dur- iting. Some particularly interesting features are de- ing the Civil War. Today, many gaps are still important scribed in more detail below. locations of roads and highways. For this report, landforms are listed alphabetically Dismal Swamp (see Chesapeake, City of) by county or city. Features along county lines are de- The Dismal Swamp, located in southeastern Virginia, scribed in only one county with references in other ap- is about 10 to 11 miles wide and 15 miles long, and propriate counties.
  • May 8–12, 2018

    May 8–12, 2018

    May 8–12, 2018 Event Program Schedule – Web Edition *NOTE 1: All schedules subject to change. *NOTE 2: For all outdoor excursions including hikes, bus trips and activities, please review the specific Outdoor Excursions Schedule for sign-ups and refer to the Outdoor Excursions Procedures and Rules. Tuesday, May 8 8 AM: LeConte Center at Pigeon Forge Main Entrance opens 9 – 10 AM: NEW! HERITAGE! Frontier Life: Women’s Role in Western Frontier Living in North Carolina (present-day East Tennessee) – Overmountain Victory Trail Association – Greenbriar Hall A 9 – 4 PM: Pre–registration for Tuesday, May 8 LIMITED Sessions – Preregistration Table 9:30 – 10:30 AM: Wildflowers of the Smokies – Jack Carman – North 3A 9:30 – 11:30 AM: All About Spin Fishing Great Smoky Mountains National Park Area Stocked Trout Streams, As Well As Local Smallmouth – Greg Ward – North 3B Join Greg as he discusses spin fishing techniques while relating his lifetime of fishing knowledge. 10 – 11 AM: NEW! All About Firewise in Pigeon Forge – Kevin Nunn and Matt Lovitt – North 1B Join Pigeon Forge Firefighters Kevin and Matt with the Tennessee Division of Forestry as they discuss the historical perspective of wildfires in East Tennessee, wildfire prevention in Pigeon Forge and recommendations relating to keeping your homes safe through Firewise practices. 10 – 11 AM: NEW! Wilderness Wildlife Week 48 Hour Film Race Registration and Kickoff – Greenbriar Hall C 10 – 6 PM: Wilderness Wildlife Week Digital Display Photography Contest and Special Displays opens – North 1A 10
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie

    Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie

    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
  • Overview of the Strategic and Structural Evolution of the Talladega Slate Belt, Alabama Appalachians

    Overview of the Strategic and Structural Evolution of the Talladega Slate Belt, Alabama Appalachians

    fl d029-08 1st pgs page 1 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 29 2012 Overview of the stratigraphic and structural evolution of the Talladega slate belt, Alabama Appalachians James F. Tull* Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University Clinton I. Barineau* Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Columbus State University ABSTRACT The allochthonous Talladega belt of eastern-northeastern Alabama and north- western Georgia is a northeast striking, fault bounded block of lower greenschist facies metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks that formed along the margin of Lau- rentia at or outboard of the seaward edge of the Alabama promontory. Bounded by metamorphic rocks of the higher grade Neoproterozoic(?) to Carboniferous eastern Blue Ridge on the southeast and unmetamorphosed to anchimetamorphic Paleozoic rocks of the Appalachian foreland on the northwest, the Talladega belt includes shelf facies rocks of the latest Neoproterozoic/earliest Cambrian Kahatchee Mountain Group, Cambrian-Ordovician Sylacauga Marble Group, and the latest Silurian(?) to uppermost Devonian/earliest Mississippian Talladega Group. Along the southeast- ern fl ank of these metasedimentary sequences, a Middle Ordovician back-arc terrane (Hillabee Greenstone) was tectonically emplaced along a cryptic pre-metamorphic thrust fault (Hillabee thrust) and subsequently dismembered with units of the upper Talladega Group along the post-metamorphic Hollins Line fault system. Importantly, strata within the Talladega belt are critical for understanding the tectonic evolution of the southern Appalachian orogen when coupled with the geologic history of adjacent terranes. Rocks of the lower Talladega Group, the Lay Dam Formation, suggest latest Silurian-earliest Devonian tectonism that is only now being recognized in other areas of the southern Appalachians.
  • Governor's School

    Governor's School

    Governor’s school for Scientific Models and Data Analysis Summer 2016 Sunday, May 22nd ---- Friday, June 24th Sponsored by: The Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education East Tennessee State University P.O. Box 70301, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614 http://www.etsu.edu/cas/math/mathexcellence/default.aspx http://www.etsu.edu/cas/math/mathexcellence/govschool/default.aspx http://www.netstemhub.com Contents Governor’s School 2016 ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Welcome to East Tennessee State University ........................................................................................................................ 4 The Gray Fossil Site & Natural History Museum ................................................................................................................. 5 Snap-On Tools Tour, Elizabethton, TN ............................................................................................................................... 7 Tour of the ETSU Medical School Labs ............................................................................................................................... 9 Group Photos ................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Trip to Eastman Chemical Company .................................................................................................................................