Nesting Success and Productivity of Tucuman Parrots (Amazona Tucumana) in High-Altitude Forests of Argentina: Do They Differ from Lowland Amazona Parrots?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nesting Success and Productivity of Tucuman Parrots (Amazona Tucumana) in High-Altitude Forests of Argentina: Do They Differ from Lowland Amazona Parrots? CSIRO PUBLISHING Emu http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MU12062 Nesting success and productivity of Tucuman Parrots (Amazona tucumana) in high-altitude forests of Argentina: do they differ from lowland Amazona parrots? Luis RiveraA,D, Natalia Politi A, Enrique H. Bucher B and Anna Pidgeon C AFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, CONICET, Alberdi 47, S. S. de Jujuy (4600), Jujuy, Argentina. BCentro de Zoología Aplicada, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET, Casilla de Correo 122, Córdoba (5000), Argentina. CDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 120 Russell Laboratories, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, WI 53706-1598, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Most of our knowledge of reproduction of wild parrots in the Neotropics comes from studies of tropical lowland species, with few studies addressing species of high-altitude forests. We studied the reproductive biology of Tucuman Parrots (Amazona tucumana) in north-western Argentina between 2004 and 2009. We obtained data on reproductive output for 86 nests and on causes of mortality for 94 nests. Mean clutch-size per nesting attempt was 3.6 eggs Æ 1.0 (s.d.). Hatching success (proportion of eggs laid that hatch) was 0.77 Æ 0.17. Fledging success (proportion of nestlings that fledge) was 0.83 Æ 0.13. The overall breeding success (mean number of fledglings per laying female per year) was 2.3 Æ 0.8. Overall finite nesting success (daily survival rate to the power of the nesting length) was 0.53 Æ 0.27, and chick finite nesting success rate was 0.74 Æ 0.22. We did not find differences in reproductive rate between Tucuman Parrots and other species of Amazona parrot from lowland habitats. Productivity and nesting success of Tucuman Parrots had high values in some years and low values in others. This was probably related to fruiting events of Podocarpus parlatorei – a critical food item. The main causes of nesting failure were predation (16%) and abandonment (12%). Our results suggest that for several species of Amazona in lowland habitats, predation and poaching may be the main limiting factors whereas climatic factors and food availability may contribute most to nesting failure at higher altitudes. Additional keywords: breeding biology, mortality factors, reproductive output, subtropical cloud forests. Received 1 October 2012, accepted 10 May 2103, published online 20 September 2013 Introduction parrots that occur in high-altitude forests, i.e. the Thick-billed Detailed knowledge of breeding biology is necessary for under- Parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha) and the Indigo-winged standing variation in avian reproductive strategies, because it Parrot (Hapalopsittaca fuertesi), there has been only one study provides critical natural history data that are useful for generating that has described reproductive rates (Thick-billed: Monterrubio new hypotheses and testing old ones (Auer et al. 2007). The lack et al. 2002) and another on nestling growth and plumage devel- of information on the natural history, ecology and demography opment (Indigo-winged: Tovar-Martinez 2009). of many parrot species precludes an assessment of the mechan- There is a well-established pattern of variation in bird life- isms that regulate population dynamics (Koenig 2001). There history traits along latitudinal gradients in which life-history have been a number of studies of the nesting and reproductive strategies of tropical and southern hemisphere birds differ behaviour of several lowland tropical forest species of Amazona markedly from those of northern temperate birds (Martin parrot (Gnam 1991; Rojas Suárez 1991; Enkerlin-Hoeflich 1995; 2004). Elevation has long been considered an important factor Koenig 2001; Fernandes Seixas and Mourao 2002; Renton and in shaping the evolution of life-history traits (Cody 1966; Salinas Melgoza 2004; Sanz and Rodríguez Ferraro 2006; Rodrí- Badyaev 1997). High-elevation species have been thought to guez Castillo and Eberhard 2006; Berkunsky and Reboreda have higher reproductive rates, potentially compensating for 2009). However, the behaviour and reproductive rates of Ama- the less predictable climate, and lower population density and zona parrots that nest in temperate and high-altitude forests to experience generally more limited availability of food (Cody (above 1500 m above sea level), specifically the Scaly-naped 1966; Badyaev 1997). Congeners whose young are altricial Parrot (A. mercenaria) and the Tucuman Parrot (A. tucumana), have larger clutches at high elevation than at lower elevations are not known (Juniper and Parr 1998). Of the other two (Stewart et al. 1977; Weathers et al. 2002; Johnson et al. 2006). Journal compilation Ó BirdLife Australia 2013 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/emu B Emu L. Rivera et al. However, there is also evidence suggesting that birds shift to a mountain range ~100 km long, between the Cordillera Oriental to slower life-history strategy with increasing elevation, investing the west and the Chaco plain to the east. The Southern Yungas less in reproduction and producing smaller clutches than birds at supports a semi-evergreen subtropical montane cloud forest that lower altitudes (Krementz and Handford 1984; Badyaev 1997; forms the southernmost part of the Andean tropical forest Badyaev and Ghalambor 2001). (Cabrera 1976). The cloud forest is dominated by Podocarpus Some reproductive parameters of Amazona parrots from parlatorei, Alnus acuminata and trees of the family Myrtaceae. lowland tropical forest are well known. Most Amazona parrots The local climate has a marked dry season from April to October have rates of nesting success of 35–57% (Gnam and Rockwell and a rainy season from November to March. Annual rainfall is 1991; Enkerlin-Hoeflich 1995; Koenig 2001; Fernandes Seixas 800–1500 mm and mean annual temperature is 11.7C (Mendoza and Mourao 2002; Renton and Salinas Melgoza 2004; Sanz and 2005). Rodríguez Ferraro 2006). However, island species tend to have Within the central sector of the Southern Yungas, we focussed higher rates of success, of 46–82% (Snyder et al. 1987; Gnam and on two areas where we knew of active nests: (1) El Rey National Rockwell 1991) and in studies of two Amazona species with the Park (24430S, 64380W, 44 000 ha) and (2) Portal de Piedra lowest documented rates of nesting success (i.e. 0–13%), rates of Private Reserve (24050S, 64260W, 400 ha). Both areas are nest poaching were high (Martuscelli 1995; Rodríguez Castillo strictly protected and controlled, no people live within the and Eberhard 2006). Most Amazona species have a mean clutch- reserves and, to the best of our knowledge, there is no poaching size of 2.6–3.6 eggs and produce 0.3–2.5 fledglings per female (in 5 years of field-work we did not detect any signs or tracks of (Snyder et al.1987; Gnam and Rockwell 1991; Enkerlin-Hoeflich people in the nesting areas). The study was conducted within 1995; Martuscelli 1995; Koenig 2001; Renton and Salinas accessible areas only. These comprised ~170 ha in Portal de Melgoza 2004; Rodríguez Castillo and Eberhard 2006; Sanz and Piedra Private Reserve and 50 ha in El Rey National Park. Rodríguez Ferraro 2006). Elevation of these areas is between 1450 and 2100 m above sea In contrast to many lowland forest species of Amazona,the level. Tucuman Parrot has a small geographical range in the narrow strip of cloud forest (1400–2200 m above sea level) of the Southern Yungas on the eastern slopes of the Andes from south-eastern Data collection Boliviatonorth-westernArgentina(FjeldsåandKrabbe1990).The Field-work was conducted from November to March over five species is categorised as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List, and breeding seasons between 2004 and 2009. We recorded pairs of is included in CITES Appendix I prohibiting international trade Tucuman Parrots prospecting for nesting cavities in November, (BirdLife International 2011). A recent assessment of the status of laying eggs from early to mid-December, and young fledging the species estimated that current population is probably ~33% from mid- to late February. Daily searches for active nests were smaller than in the 1980s (Rivera et al. 2007, 2010). conducted for 35–40 days each breeding season during the Food availability is a major factor affecting annual produc- laying and incubation periods (December–mid-January). We tivity of parrots (Renton and Salinas Melgoza 2004; Díaz et al. used a hand-held GPS unit (Garmin Etrex HCx, Garmin Inter- 2012). The Tucuman Parrot relies heavily on a single food item, national Inc., Olathe, KS, USA) to record the boundaries of the the seeds of Podocarpus parlatorei (Pinales : Podocarpaceae), for area surveyed, which were later imported into a geographical feeding nestlings (Rivera 2011). The reproductive biology of information system (ArcGIS 9, ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA). the Tucuman Parrot is virtually unknown, with only one record Active nests were found by following males to the nesting area of a nest, from January in the 1940s in Chuquisaca Department, and locating the cavity when the female left to be fed by the male Bolivia (Bond and Meyer de Schauensee 1943). (González Elizondo 1998). Nests were found throughout the An understanding of the reproductive biology of the Tucuman incubation period and the early nestling period, when females Parrot may provide insights into the mechanisms that regulate were incubating or brooding. We did not find nests later in the population dynamics of this species and the associated limiting nesting cycle because
Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • TAG Operational Structure
    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Population Size, Provisioning Frequency, Flock Size and Foraging
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Naturalis Population size, provisioning frequency, flock size and foraging range at the largest known colony of Psittaciformes: the Burrowing Parrots of the north-eastern Patagonian coastal cliffs Juan F. MaselloA,B,C,G, María Luján PagnossinD, Christina SommerE and Petra QuillfeldtF AInstitut für Ökologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany. BEcology of Vision Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, UK. CMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Schlossallee 2, D-78315 Radolfzell, Germany. DFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. EInstitut für Biologie/Verhaltensbiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. FSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, UK. GCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract.We here describe the largest colony of Burrowing Parrots (Cyanoliseus patagonus), located in Patagonia, Argentina. Counts during the 2001–02 breeding season showed that the colony extended along 9 km of a sandstone cliff facing the Altantic Ocean, in the province of Río Negro, Patagonia, Argentina, and contained 51412 burrows, an estimated 37527 of which were active. To our knowledge, this is largest known colony of Psittaciformes. Additionally, 6500 Parrots not attending nestlings were found to be associated with the colony during the 2003–04 breeding season. We monitored activities at nests and movements between nesting and feeding areas. Nestlings were fed 3–6 times daily. Adults travelled in flocks of up to 263 Parrots to the feeding grounds in early mornings; later in the day, they flew in smaller flocks, making 1–4 trips to the feeding grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Two Endangered Neotropical Parrots Inform in Situ and Ex Situ Conservation Strategies
    diversity Article Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Two Endangered Neotropical Parrots Inform In Situ and Ex Situ Conservation Strategies Carlos I. Campos 1 , Melinda A. Martinez 1, Daniel Acosta 1, Jose A. Diaz-Luque 2, Igor Berkunsky 3 , Nadine L. Lamberski 4, Javier Cruz-Nieto 5 , Michael A. Russello 6 and Timothy F. Wright 1,* 1 Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA; [email protected] (C.I.C.); [email protected] (M.A.M.); [email protected] (D.A.) 2 Fundación CLB (FPCILB), Estación Argentina, Calle Fermín Rivero 3460, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia; [email protected] 3 Instituto Multidisciplinario sobre Ecosistemas y Desarrollo Sustenable, CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Tandil 7000, Argentina; [email protected] 4 San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, San Diego, CA 92027, USA; [email protected] 5 Organización Vida Silvestre A.C. (OVIS), San Pedro Garza Garciá 66260, Mexico; [email protected] 6 Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: A key aspect in the conservation of endangered populations is understanding patterns of Citation: Campos, C.I.; Martinez, genetic variation and structure, which can provide managers with critical information to support M.A.; Acosta, D.; Diaz-Luque, J.A.; evidence-based status assessments and management strategies. This is especially important for Berkunsky, I.; Lamberski, N.L.; species with small wild and larger captive populations, as found in many endangered parrots. We Cruz-Nieto, J.; Russello, M.A.; Wright, used genotypic data to assess genetic variation and structure in wild and captive populations of T.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Parrots in the London Area a London Bird Atlas Supplement
    Parrots in the London Area A London Bird Atlas Supplement Richard Arnold, Ian Woodward, Neil Smith 2 3 Abstract species have been recorded (EASIN http://alien.jrc. Senegal Parrot and Blue-fronted Amazon remain between 2006 and 2015 (LBR). There are several ec.europa.eu/SpeciesMapper ). The populations of more or less readily available to buy from breeders, potential factors which may combine to explain the Parrots are widely introduced outside their native these birds are very often associated with towns while the smaller species can easily be bought in a lack of correlation. These may include (i) varying range, with non-native populations of several and cities (Lever, 2005; Butler, 2005). In Britain, pet shop. inclination or ability (identification skills) to report species occurring in Europe, including the UK. As there is just one parrot species, the Ring-necked (or Although deliberate release and further import of particular species by both communities; (ii) varying well as the well-established population of Ring- Rose-ringed) parakeet Psittacula krameri, which wild birds are both illegal, the captive populations lengths of time that different species survive after necked Parakeet (Psittacula krameri), five or six is listed by the British Ornithologists’ Union (BOU) remain a potential source for feral populations. escaping/being released; (iii) the ease of re-capture; other species have bred in Britain and one of these, as a self-sustaining introduced species (Category Escapes or releases of several species are clearly a (iv) the low likelihood that deliberate releases will the Monk Parakeet, (Myiopsitta monachus) can form C). The other five or six¹ species which have bred regular event.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Species I Have Seen World List
    bird species I have seen U.K tally: 276 US tally: 394 Total world: 1,495 world list 1. Abyssinian ground hornbill 2. Abyssinian longclaw 3. Abyssinian white-eye 4. Acorn woodpecker 5. African black-headed oriole 6. African drongo 7. African fish-eagle 8. African harrier-hawk 9. African hawk-eagle 10. African mourning dove 11. African palm swift 12. African paradise flycatcher 13. African paradise monarch 14. African pied wagtail 15. African rook 16. African white-backed vulture 17. Agami heron 18. Alexandrine parakeet 19. Amazon kingfisher 20. American avocet 21. American bittern 22. American black duck 23. American cliff swallow 24. American coot 25. American crow 26. American dipper 27. American flamingo 28. American golden plover 29. American goldfinch 30. American kestrel 31. American mag 32. American oystercatcher 33. American pipit 34. American pygmy kingfisher 35. American redstart 36. American robin 37. American swallow-tailed kite 38. American tree sparrow 39. American white pelican 40. American wigeon 41. Ancient murrelet 42. Andean avocet 43. Andean condor 44. Andean flamingo 45. Andean gull 46. Andean negrito 47. Andean swift 48. Anhinga 49. Antillean crested hummingbird 50. Antillean euphonia 51. Antillean mango 52. Antillean nighthawk 53. Antillean palm-swift 54. Aplomado falcon 55. Arabian bustard 56. Arcadian flycatcher 57. Arctic redpoll 58. Arctic skua 59. Arctic tern 60. Armenian gull 61. Arrow-headed warbler 62. Ash-throated flycatcher 63. Ashy-headed goose 64. Ashy-headed laughing thrush (endemic) 65. Asian black bulbul 66. Asian openbill 67. Asian palm-swift 68. Asian paradise flycatcher 69. Asian woolly-necked stork 70.
    [Show full text]
  • ON 22(1) 103-110.Pdf
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 22: 103–110, 2011 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society FIRST NESTING RECORDS OF THE ENDEMIC SLENDER-BILLED PARAKEET (ENICOGNATHUS LEPTORHYNCHUS) IN SOUTHERN CHILE Maurice Peña-Foxon1, Silvina Ippi2, & Iván A. Díaz3 1Instituto de Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile. E-mail: [email protected] 2Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile. 3Instituto de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile. Resumen. – Primeros registros de nidos de Choroy (Enicognathus leptorhynchus) en el sur de Chile. – Documentamos los primeros antecedentes sobre la nidificación del loro Choroy (Enicognathus leptorhynchus) obtenidos a partir de dos nidos naturales ubicados en el bosque templado del sur de Chile. Los nidos se encontraron en cavidades naturales a 19 m de altura en árboles emergentes del dosel. La postura alcanzó hasta 10 huevos y eclosionaron 4 y 5 pichones, respectivamente. El período de incubación duró aproximadamente 30 días, y los polluelos permanecieron en el nido alrededor de otros 40 días. Los pichones tuvieron una pérdida de peso previo a abandonar el nido y siguieron cre- ciendo una vez fuera. Los pichones desarrollaron dos plumones distintos antes de la aparición de las plumas, un patrón previamente descrito para un loro endémico de la alta cordillera de Colombia. Esto podría ser una estrategia de los psitácidos habitantes de zonas frías para combatir las bajas temperatu- ras mientras permanecen en el nido. Nuestro trabajo confirma la necesidad de seguir estudiando la biología reproductiva de los psitácidos que habitan las zonas templadas, en particular de Sudamérica.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestsite Selection by Slenderbilled Parakeets in a Chilean
    Journal of Field Ornithology J. Field Ornithol. 84(1):13–22, 2013 DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12001 Nest-site selection by Slender-billed Parakeets in a Chilean agricultural-forest mosaic Ana Paula B. Carneiro,1 Jaime E. Jimenez,´ 2 Pablo M. Vergara,3 and Thomas H. White, Jr.4,5 1Laboratorio de Vida Silvestre, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile 2Sub-Antarctic Biocultural Conservation Program, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76207, USA, and Omora Etnobotanical Park, Universidad de Magallanes, Puerto Williams, Chile 3Departamento de Gestion´ Agraria, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile 4U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Puerto Rican Parrot Recovery Program, Box 1600, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico 00745, USA Received 26 December 2011; accepted 9 November 2012 ABSTRACT. Species in the family Psittacidae may be particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic habitat transformations that reduce availability of suitable breeding sites at different spatial scales. In southern Chile, loss of native forest cover due to agricultural conversion may impact populations of Slender-billed Parakeets (Enicognathus leptorhynchus), endemic secondary cavity-nesting psittacids. Our objective was to assess nest-site selection by Slender-billed Parakeets in an agricultural-forest mosaic of southern Chile at two spatial scales: nest trees and the habitat surrounding those trees. During the 2008–2009 breeding seasons, we identified nest sites (N = 31) by observing parakeet behavior and using information provided by local residents. Most (29/31) nests were in mature Nothofagus obliqua trees. By comparing trees used for nesting with randomly selected, unused trees, we found that the probability of a tree being selected as a nest site was positively related to the number of cavity entrances, less dead crown, and more basal injuries (e.g., fire scars).
    [Show full text]
  • By Ascaridia Hermaphrodita (Froelich, 1789, Railliet & Henry, 1914) at the National Zoo of Santiago, Chile
    Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., v.59, n.2, p.539-540, 2007 Communication [Comunicação] Death of two slender-billed parakeet (King) (Enicognathus leptorhynchus) (Aves, Psittacidae) by Ascaridia hermaphrodita (Froelich, 1789, Railliet & Henry, 1914) at the National Zoo of Santiago, Chile [Morte de dois psitacideos (king) Enicognathus leptorhynchus) (Aves, Psittacidae) por Ascaridia hermaphrodita(Froelich, 1789, Railliet & Henry, 1914) no Zoológico Nacional de Santiago, Chile] D. González-Acuña1, M. Fabry2, A.A. Nascimento3, J.H. Tebaldi3 1Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria - Universidad de Concepción Casilla 537 Chillán, Chile 2Zoológico Nacional - Parque Metropolitano de Santiago - Santiago 3Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias - UNESP - Jaboticabal, SP The Chilean psittacids are represented by four lesions, congestion of the intestinal mucous and species: Cyanoliseus patagonus, Enicognathus an increase of mucous production were observed. ferrugineus, Bolborhynchus aurifrons and the endemic species Enicognathus leptorhynchus. The nematodes were put in hot alcohol 70% and, These species are permanently endangered due to afterwards, treated with creosote to make them trafficking and the degradation of their natural clear. Then, they were examined, measured, habitats. Many of the Psittacids taken to the Zoo identified as Ascaridia hermaphrodita, and have been confiscated by the Servicio Agrícola y stored in the helminthological collection of the Ganadero (SAG) from private owners who have University of Concepción, Chile. illegally held them as pets. E. leptorhynchus is listed as endangered in Central Chile, vulnerable Froelich (1789) described a parasite collected in in Southern Chile and a species whose the intestines of psittacides as Ascaris conservation status is inadequately known in hermaphrodita, included in the superfamily Southernmost Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Molt in the Burrowing Parrot.-The Burrowing Parrot (Cyunoliseus Patugonus) Has One of the Southernmostranges of Neotropicalparrots
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 107 Wilson Bull., 99(l), 1987, pp. 107-109 Reproduction and molt in the Burrowing Parrot.-The Burrowing Parrot (Cyunoliseus patugonus) has one of the southernmostranges of neotropicalparrots. In Argentina, it occurs from the arid Andean slopesin the northwest (24”s) to the Patagonian steppe in the south (46%) (Forshaw 1978). The parrot, which nests colonially in burrows dug into cliff faces,is shot as an agricultural pest and has recently been exported in large numbers for the pet trade, causinglocal declines in its population (Ridgely 1980). Here, we report on the cycle of wild BurrowingParrots in terms of changesin body weight, fat deposits,gonadal condition, and molt. Study area and methods. -The study area was between 33” and 33”3O’Sand 66” and 67”W in the plains near the Sierras de San Luis, San Luis province, central Argentina. The pre- dominant vegetation is an open dry woodland savanna mixed with grasslands.Dominant tree speciesinclude Geofroea decorticans, Prosopis caldenia, P. chilensis, and P. jlexuosa, all of whose fruits are eaten by Burrowing Parrots. Annual rainfall, which is concentratedin the summer (November-April), averages69.5 cm. Mean annual temperatureis 17°C (Instituto National de TecnologiaAgropecuaria, Villa Mercedes Experimental Station, 30 km east of the study area). We obtained parrots from farmers involved in control campaigns,as the Burrowing Parrot is considereda pest by local authorities. We obtained 7-35 parrots monthly from September 1978 to August 1979, with the exception of December 1978, when only two birds were obtained. Birds came from Paso de las Carretas,near Eleodoro Lobos, except in May, June, and July 1979, when all but a few parrots had left the area, and the sample was completed with birds obtained in Alto Pencoso,about 100 km west.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects Found in Birds' Nests from Argentina
    Zootaxa 2728: 1–22 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Insects found in birds’ nests from Argentina. Cyanoliseus patagonus (Vieillot, 1818) [Aves: Psittacidae], with the description of Cyanolicimex patagonicus, gen. n., sp. n., and a key to the genera of Haematosiphoninae (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) OSVALDO DI IORIO1, PAOLA TURIENZO1, JUAN MASELLO2, & DIEGO L. CARPINTERO3 1 Entomología. Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. 4° Piso, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Schlossallee 2, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 3División Entomología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Avenida Ángel Gallardo 470 ,1405 Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract The Burrowing Parrot, Cyanoliseus patagonus (Vieillot, 1817) [Aves: Psittacidae], is one of the most southern Neotropical parrots. They require sandstone, limestone, or earth cliffs where they excavate their colonial nest-burrows. Adult C. p. patagonus excavate their own nest-burrows, most of them about 1.5 m deep.Each burrow is occupied by a single pair that lay one clutch of two to five eggs per year, directly on the sand of the breeding chamber. The breeding birds abandon the place until the start of the next breeding attempt in the following year. Burrow nests from Río Negro province (Argentina) are inhabited by two ectoparasitic insects, the flea Hectopsylla narium (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae), and Cyanolicimex patagonicus, gen. n., sp.
    [Show full text]