DOCSLIB.ORG

Ra82 Diptera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ra82 Diptera RA82 DIPTERA: Mycetophilinae Fungus Gnats (6480) Recording Form Locality Date(s) from: to: Vice county GPS users Grey cells for Habitat Altitude (metres) Source (circle *Source details Recorder Determiner Compiler one) Field 1 Museum* 2 Grid reference Literature* 3 MYCETOPHILIDAE: Mycetophilinae 33101 Exechiopsis (Exechiopsis) clypeata Exechiini 33117 dryaspagensis 32801 Allodia (Allodia) anglofennica 33519 griseolum33118 dumitrescae 32912 embla 33526 intermedium33119 fimbriata 32802 lugens 33522 kingi33120 furcata 32803 lundstroemi 33523 nigrofuscum33106 hammi 32804 ornaticollis 33524 proximum33107 indecisa 32806 truncata 33527 rosmellitum33108 intersecta 32805 zaitzevi 33514 ruficorne33109 jenkinsoni 32901 Allodia (Brachycampta) alternans 33515 serenum33110 ligulata 32910 angulata 33516 sericoma33121 magnicauda 32903 barbata 33601 Cordyla brevicornis33112 pseudindecisa 32904 czernyi 33602 crassicornis33113 pulchella 32909 foliifera 33603 fasciata33114 subulata 32905 grata 33604 fissa33115 unguiculata 32906 neglecta 33605 flaviceps33116 Exechiopsis (Xenexechia) crucigera 32907 pistillata 33606 fusca33002 leptura 32915 protenta 33613 insons33003 membranacea 32914 silvatica 33608 murina33122 pollicata 32916 westerholti 33609 nitidula32605 Myrosia maculosa 32602 Allodiopsis domestica 33610 parvipalpis32601 Notolopha cristata 32610 korolevi 33614 pseudomurina32701 Pseudexechia aurivernica 32607 rustica 33611 pusilla32706 monica 32212 Anatella alpina 33612 semiflava32705 parallela 32213 ankeli 33201 Exechia bicincta32703 trisignata 32216 bremia 33209 borealis32704 trivittata 32201 ciliata 33231 chandleri33301 Pseudobrachypeza helvetica 32214 dampfi 33232 cincinnata32401 Pseudorymosia fovea 32217 emergens 33225 cincta32311 Rymosia acta 32203 flavomaculata 33203 confinis32312 affinis 32204 lenis 33204 contaminata32313 armata 32205 longisetosa 33226 dizona32303 bifida 32206 minuta 33206 dorsalis32314 britteni 32215 pseudogibba 33207 exigua32315 connexa 32208 setigera 33208 festiva32317 coulsoni 32209 simpatica 33210 fusca32306 fasciata 32210 turi 33227 lucidula32318 fosteri 32211 unguigera 33233 macula32307 placida 33404 Brachypeza armata 33214 nigra32308 setiger 33402 bisignata 33215 nigroscutellata32319 signatipes 33403 radiata 33216 parva32320 speyae 33528 Brevicornu arcticoides 33213 parvula32309 spinipes 33518 arcticum 33229 pectinivalva32321 thorneae 33502 auriculatum 33217 pseudocincta32310 virens 33521 canescens 33230 pseudofestiva33504 Stigmatomeria crassicornis 33520 fennicum 33219 repanda32603 Synplasta gracilis 33506 fissicauda 33234 repandoides32608 ingeniosa 33507 foliatum 33222 separata32609 rufilatera 33508 fuscipenne 33221 seriata32504 Tarnania dziedzickii 33525 glandis 33224 spinuligera32502 fenestralis 33509 griseicolle 33223 styriaca32503 nemoralis 32505 tarnanii The information on this card, including name(s) of recorders and experts, is contributed to the fungus gnat recording scheme or BRC on the understanding that the data will be entered into a computerised database and will be used for nature conservation, research, education and public information. The information remains the property of the recorder or the recorder's employer. Mycetophilini 33905 Dynatosoma cochleare 34088 perpallida33825 strenua 33902 fuscicorne 34042 pictula33838 sudetica 33906 nigromaculatum 34043 pumila33841 sylvatica 33907 norwegiense 34044 rudis33827 tenuis 33904 reciprocum 34045 ruficollis33842 tiefii 34301 Epicypta aterrima 34081 schnablii33828 triangularis 34302 limnophila 34082 scotica33843 vitrea 34001 Mycetophila abbreviata 34049 sepulta34501 Platurocypta punctum 34002 abiecta 34051 signata34502 testata 34003 adumbrata 34052 signatoides34409 Sceptonia concolor 34004 alea 34053 sordida34402 costata 34065 autumnalis 34054 spectabilis34414 cryptocauda 34066 bialorussica 34055 stolida34410 flavipuncta 34007 blanda 34089 stricklandi34404 fumipes 34067 bohemica 34056 strigata34411 fuscipalpis 34009 britannica 34083 strigatoides34412 humerella 34068 caudata 34058 stylata34407 membranacea 34011 cingulum 34050 subsigillata34408 nigra 34012 confluens 34084 sumavica34415 pilosa 34013 confusa 34059 tridentata34416 pughi 34014 curviseta 34060 trinotata34417 regni 34069 czizekii 34091 uliginosa34413 tenuis 34072 deflexa 34061 unicolor33719 Trichonta apicalis 34016 dentata 34092 uninotata33702 atricauda 34070 dziedzickii 34062 unipunctata33720 bicolor 34018 edwardsi 34063 vittipes33727 brigantia 34086 eppingensis 34085 v-nigrum33721 clavigera 34087 evanida 33801 Phronia basalis33705 falcata 34019 finlandica 33802 biarcuata33722 flavicauda 34020 forcipata 33803 braueri33707 foeda 34021 formosa 33830 caliginosa33708 fragilis 34022 fraterna 33805 cinerascens33723 fusca 34071 freyii 33806 conformis33710 hamata 34024 fungorum 33826 coritanica33711 icenica 34025 gibbula 33807 disgrega33712 melanura 34027 hetschkoi 33808 egregia33724 nigritula 34028 ichneumonea 33831 electa33725 pulchra 34073 immaculata 33810 exigua33714 subfusca 34030 lamellata 33811 flavipes33715 submaculata 34074 lapponica 33812 forcipata33716 terminalis 34075 lastovkai 33813 humeralis33717 venosa 34076 lubomirskii 33833 interstincta33718 vitta 34032 luctuosa 33835 mutabilis33726 vulcani 34033 lunata 33817 nigricornis34201 Zygomyia humeralis 34034 magnicauda 33818 nitidiventris34206 kiddi 34035 marginata 33819 notata34202 notata 34077 mitis 33820 obtusa34203 pictipennis 34078 mohilevensis 33836 persimilis34207 pseudohumeralis 34079 morosa 33839 petulans34048 semifusca 34039 occultans 33840 portschinskyi34208 valeriae 34040 ocellus 33822 siebeckii34204 valida 34041 ornata 33823 signata34205 vara For other fungus gnats, use RA81 Other species and comments Biological Records Centre December 2006 RA82.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recent Noteworthy Findings of Fungus Gnats from Finland and Northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae)
    Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 Taxonomic paper Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae) Jevgeni Jakovlev†, Jukka Salmela ‡,§, Alexei Polevoi|, Jouni Penttinen ¶, Noora-Annukka Vartija# † Finnish Environment Insitutute, Helsinki, Finland ‡ Metsähallitus (Natural Heritage Services), Rovaniemi, Finland § Zoological Museum, University of Turku, Turku, Finland | Forest Research Institute KarRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia ¶ Metsähallitus (Natural Heritage Services), Jyväskylä, Finland # Toivakka, Myllyntie, Finland Corresponding author: Jukka Salmela ([email protected]) Academic editor: Vladimir Blagoderov Received: 10 Feb 2014 | Accepted: 01 Apr 2014 | Published: 02 Apr 2014 Citation: Jakovlev J, Salmela J, Polevoi A, Penttinen J, Vartija N (2014) Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 Abstract New faunistic data on fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaroidea excluding Sciaridae) from Finland and NW Russia (Karelia and Murmansk Region) are presented. A total of 64 and 34 species are reported for the first time form Finland and Russian Karelia, respectively. Nine of the species are also new for the European fauna: Mycomya shewelli Väisänen, 1984,M. thula Väisänen, 1984, Acnemia trifida Zaitzev, 1982, Coelosia gracilis Johannsen, 1912, Orfelia krivosheinae Zaitzev, 1994, Mycetophila biformis Maximova, 2002, M. monstera Maximova, 2002, M. uschaica Subbotina & Maximova, 2011 and Trichonta palustris Maximova, 2002. Keywords Sciaroidea, Fennoscandia, faunistics © Jakovlev J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Greece, Its Islands
    CHANDLERet al.: 255-314 - Studia dipterologica 12 (2005) Heft 2 ISSN 0945-3954 The Fungus Gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae , Keroplatidae and Mycetophilidae) of Greece, its islands and Cyprus [Die Pilzmiicken (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae und Mycetophilidae) Griechenlands und seiner Inseln sowie Zypern4 1 by Peter J. CHANDLER, Dimitar N. BECHEV and Norbert CASPERS Mclksham (UK) Plovdiv (Bulgaria) Bechen (Gernlany) - - -. - ~ Abstract The spccics of fungu\ gnats (Bolitophilidae, Diadoc~dildae,Ditomyiidac. Keroplat~d:~eand Mycetophilidae) o~urringin Greece and Cyprus are reviewed. Altogether 201 species :Ire recorded, 189 for Greece and 69 for Cyprus. Of these 126 specie5 arc newly recorded fol. Greece and 36 arc newly recorded for Cyprus. The following new taxa arc described from Greece: Macrorrhyrtcha ibis spec. nov., M. pelargos spec. nov., M. laconica spec. nov., Macrocera critica spec. nov., Docosia cephaloniae spec. nov., D. enos spec. nov., D. pa- siphae spec. nov., Megophthalmidia illyrica spec. nov.. M. ionica spec. nov., M. pytho spec. nov., Mycomya thrakis spec. nov., Allocolocera scheria spec. nov., Sciophila pandora spec. nov., Ryrnosia labyrinthos spec. nov.; M. ill\,ric,cr is also recorded troln Croc~lia.The follow- ing ncw taa are described from Cyprus: Macrocera cypriaca spec. nov., Megophthalmidia alrzicola spec. nov., M. cedricola spec. nov. The following neu synonymies are propod: M!,c,c~r~iwrenuis I WXLKER,1856) = M. interniissa PL.ASSMA~N,l984 syn. nov., Plrror~rtr~1.illi.s- torri DLIFI>ZICKI,1889 = P rnciscr CASFERS,1991 syn. nov. A key is provided for thc western Palaearctic specie5 of M(ic-i.orrh~~~ic-IrciWI~~ERTZ.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, the Fungus Gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae
    Zootaxa 2318: 450–506 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The fungus gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Keroplatidae, Mycetophilidae) of Sardinia, with description of six new species* PETER J. CHANDLER 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] *In: Cerretti, P., Mason, F., Minelli, A., Nardi, G. & Whitmore, D. (Eds), Research on the Terrestrial Arthropods of Sardinia (Italy). Zootaxa, 2318, 1–602. Table of contents Abstract . .450 Introduction . .451 Study area . .452 Material and methods . .452 Abbreviations . .453 Sampling sites . .454 Faunistic list . .456 Bolitophilidae . .456 Keroplatidae, Keroplatinae, Keroplatini . .456 Orfeliini . .457 Macrocerinae . .462 Mycetophilidae, Gnoristinae . .465 Leiinae . .469 Mycetophilinae, Exechiini . .472 Mycetophilini . .480 Mycomyinae . .492 Sciophilinae . .495 Discussion . .500 Acknowledgements . .501 References . .502 Abstract The fungus gnat fauna of Sardinia is reviewed and data presented for all species recorded. Altogether one species of Bolitophilidae, 16 species of Keroplatidae and 105 species of Mycetophilidae are recognised as occurring in Sardinia. As the bolitophilid and two of the mycetophilid species are represented only by females and are not determined to species level, the total confirmed Sardinian list stands at 119 species. Four species of Keroplatidae and 19 species of Mycetophilidae are new to the total Italian fauna, whereas three species of Keroplatidae and 32 species of Mycetophilidae are newly recorded for the island of Sardinia. Six species are described as new to science: two Keroplatidae (Urytalpa juliae sp. nov., Macrocera nuragica sp. nov.) and four Mycetophilidae (Boletina ichnusa sp. nov., Trichonta sandalyon sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset's Ecological Network
    Somerset’s Ecological Network Mapping the components of the ecological network in Somerset 2015 Report This report was produced by Michele Bowe, Eleanor Higginson, Jake Chant and Michelle Osbourn of Somerset Wildlife Trust, and Larry Burrows of Somerset County Council, with the support of Dr Kevin Watts of Forest Research. The BEETLE least-cost network model used to produce Somerset’s Ecological Network was developed by Forest Research (Watts et al, 2010). GIS data and mapping was produced with the support of Somerset Environmental Records Centre and First Ecology Somerset Wildlife Trust 34 Wellington Road Taunton TA1 5AW 01823 652 400 Email: [email protected] somersetwildlife.org Front Cover: Broadleaved woodland ecological network in East Mendip Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policy and Legislative Background to Ecological Networks ............................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Government White Paper on the Natural Environment .............................................. 3 National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................... 3 The Habitats and Birds Directives ............................................................................. 4 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Systemic Status
    http://www.paper.edu.cn 浙 江 林 学 院 学 报 2003，20(1)：32—36 Journa l of Zh ejiang F orestry C ollege A rticle ID ：1000—5692(2003)01—0032—05 S tud y of system ic statu s of M yCetO p h -Iida e W A N G Y i—ping ，W U H ong ，X U H ua—chao (Institute of Forest Protection ，Zhejiang Forestry C ollege ，L in’an 311300 ．Zhejiang ．C hina ) A bstract：T he actuality of M ycetoph ilidae fam ily research has been illustrated in detail． T11e research includes biology ， classification an d idenfication ， geograp hical distribution ， status of system ic classification and system developm ent． Th e existed prob lem s and expectation are also explored in the pap er ．A ccordin g to the latest inform ation ， M ycetop hilidae fam ily is com p osed of 5 subfam ilies ， i． e ， M ycom yinae， Sciophilinae， G noristinae， Leiinae and M ycetophilinae ． M ycetophilinae includes 2 tribes ：E xechiini an d M ycetophilini． R efeFences 2 8 K ey w o rd s ： M ycetophilidae ；geograp hical d istrib ution ； clas sification status CLC Number：Q969．44 Document Code：A Th e fami ly M ycetoph ilidae belon gs to the superfam ily S ciaroidea in the order D iptera ， w h ich is th e largest fami ly in the superfami ly S ciaroidea⋯ ． B ecause of this insects feeding on edible fungi or large fungus body ， a lot of scholars have been involved in th e research on fungu s pest species ， and great progress in research on fungu s gn ats has b een m ade ． B ased on research results an d literature published at hom e and ab road in the pas t tw o decades ， the authors m ak e a sum m arization on the
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Diptera, Mycetophilidae
    Zootaxa 856: 1–35 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 856 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A review of fungus gnats in the tribe Exechiini (Diptera, Myceto- philidae) from the J. W. Zetterstedt collection at the Museum of Zoology in Lund, Sweden JOSTEIN KJÆRANDSEN Museum of Zoology, Lund University, Helgonavägen 3, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden. ([email protected]) Table of contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Material and methods . 4 Result . 6 List of species . 12 Acknowledgements . 33 References . 33 Abstract The collections of fungus gnats by Johan Wilhelm Zetterstedt (1785–1874), lodged in the Museum of Zoology in Lund, Sweden, are examined for all species belonging in the tribe Exechiini Edwards. The majority of the material was collected in Fennoscandia, mainly in Sweden, in the first half of the 19th century. Altogether 37 species of the tribe Exechiini could be safely identified. Three additional species are strongly indicated to be present in the collections, but could not be identified with certainty, viz. Allodia (Brachycampta) alternans (Zetterstedt, 1838), Cordyla murina Winnertz, 1863 and Stigmatomeria crassicornis (Stannius, 1831). Some of Zetterstedt's types have been erroneously synonymized and misinterpreted in modern literature. Hence, illustra- tions of terminalia are presented for all recognizable Exechiini types described by Zetterstedt. In order to preserve nomenclatural stability a lectotype is selected for Brevicornu griseolum (Zetter- stedt, 1852) sensu auctore nec Edwards, and a neotype is selected for Allodia (Brachycampta) alternans (Zetterstedt, 1838). Two species names are reinstated, viz. Brevicornu canescens (Zetter- stedt, 1852) sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian Journal of Natural History
    Cambodian Journal of Natural History Giant ibis census Patterns of salt lick use Protected area revisions Economic contribution of NTFPs New plants, bees and range extensions June 2016 Vol. 2016 No. 1 Cambodian Journal of Natural History ISSN 2226–969X Editors Email: [email protected] • Dr Neil M. Furey, Chief Editor, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. • Dr Jenny C. Daltry, Senior Conservation Biologist, Fauna & Flora International, UK. • Dr Nicholas J. Souter, Mekong Case Study Manager, Conservation International, Cambodia. • Dr Ith Saveng, Project Manager, University Capacity Building Project, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. International Editorial Board • Dr Stephen J. Browne, Fauna & Flora International, • Dr Sovanmoly Hul, Muséum National d’Histoire Singapore. Naturelle, Paris, France. • Dr Martin Fisher, Editor of Oryx – The International • Dr Andy L. Maxwell, World Wide Fund for Nature, Journal of Conservation, Cambridge, U.K. Cambodia. • Dr L. Lee Grismer, La Sierra University, California, • Dr Brad Pett itt , Murdoch University, Australia. USA. • Dr Campbell O. Webb, Harvard University Herbaria, • Dr Knud E. Heller, Nykøbing Falster Zoo, Denmark. USA. Other peer reviewers for this volume • Prof. Leonid Averyanov, Komarov Botanical Institute, • Neang Thy, Minstry of Environment, Cambodia. Russia. • Dr Nguyen Quang Truong, Institute of Ecology and • Prof. John Blake, University of Florida, USA. Biological Resources, Vietnam. • Dr Stephan Gale, Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden, • Dr Alain Pauly, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Hong Kong. Sciences, Belgium. • Fredéric Goes, Cambodia Bird News, France. • Dr Colin Pendry, Royal Botanical Garden, Edinburgh, • Dr Hubert Kurzweil, Singapore Botanical Gardens, UK. Singapore. • Dr Stephan Risch, Leverkusen, Germany. • Simon Mahood, Wildlife Conservation Society, • Dr Nophea Sasaki, University of Hyogo, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Kjaerandsen Sciaroidea WIP.Pdf
    Species recognition trade-off between structural wing colours and terminalia in fungus gnats ? J. Kjaerandsen Museum of Zoology Lund University Sweden Structural colours in flies Reflective scales in Diptera – Mosquitoes: Toxorhynchites manicatus (Japan) Reflective body scales in fungus gnats – only in the genus Allactoneura ? Hymenoptera: Eulophidae PhD student Ekaterina Shevtsova Wings imbedded in a medium or studied on a white background will not display their structural colours Slide with wings embedded in Canada balsam Dry specimens studied on a pure white background Mycetophilidae: Rymosia fasciata Keroplatidae: Proceroplatus scalprifera WIPs — Wing Interference Patterns i for interference Bolitophila occlusa Hybotidae: Ocydromia glabricula Cordyla sp. (California) Exechia nugatoria Photo: “Klaas” at Diptera.info, 2008 (= nigroscutellata) (California) Photos: Peter Kerr, 2008 My photo of the same species’ WIP Photos of structural wing colours on internet WIPs — Wing Interference Patterns i for interference • — Genetics of pigment patterns • — Thin Film Interference • — Newton Scale Metering • — Exechiini • — Lygistorrhinidae • — Keroplatidae • — The trade-off Pigmentation in brown, yellow and black: Spatiotemporally regulated by yellow and ebony MELANINS Leia Proceroplatus (Japan) (New Caledonia) Scientists unlock mystery of animal colour patterns Genetic April 22 control of pigment 2010 patterns T. Werner, S. Koshikawa, T. M. Williams, S. B. Carroll, Nature 464, 1143 (2010) Pigments are only a part of the ”mystery of wing colour
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Volume 117, Number 3
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 117, NUMBER 3 RELATIONSHIPS OF CERTAIN GENERA OF FUNGUS GNATS OF THE FAMILY MYCETOPHILIDAE BY F. R. SHAW AND M. M. SHAW Amherst, Mass. (Publication 4053) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION DECEMBER 27, 1951 Z^t £or5 (g»af(tmore (pv&ee BALTIMOEB, MD., 0. B. A. RELATIONSHIPS OF CERTAIN GENERA OF FUNGUS GNATS OF THE FAMILY MYCETOPHILIDAE By F. R. SHAW and M. M. SHAW i Amherst, Mass. The present study represents a continuation of a preliminary in- vestigation of the possible value of thoracic sclerites in determining the relationships of certain insects. Dr. G. C. Crampton was the first to demonstrate the use of these sclerites as a means of determin- ing the systematic position of insects. In 1925, he published a clas- sical study of the comparative morphology of the thorax of nontipu- loid Nematocera. In 1948 Shaw presented a paper in which he indi- cated the value of thoracic sclerites as an aid in determining the phy- logeny of the Mycetophilidae. Although the number of genera he studied was admittedly small, principles were developed that have been of value in distinguishing the phylogenetic relationships of cer- tain genera. Edwards (1925) was the first to indicate that the structure of thoracic sclerites might be of value in determining generic characters in this group. In his monograph of the British fungus gnats he noted that in certain genera the sclerites differed in form and that such dif- ferences might be of value in separating groups of these insects. 1 We wish to express our thanks to the Society of Sigma Xi for a grant-in- aid that made possible the preparation of the illustrations for this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • (Diptera, Nematocera, Mycetophilidae). - Im Druck
    © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Sntomojauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 5, Heft 15 ISSN 0250-4413 Linz, 15-Juli 1984 Mycetophiliden aus Lunz, Niederösterreich (Diptera, Nematocera, Mycetophilidae) Norbert Caspers Abstract As part of a limnological and entomological study using the 'greenhouse method1 (ILLIES 1971) 134 species of fungus gnats (Diptera,Nematocera,Mycetophilidae) were collected near of Lunz (Austria). The list of species is presented below. Additional notes are given on capture dates, on taxonomy and on geographical distribution pat- terns of all remarkable species. Two species in the list are new to science: Phthinia plassmanni sp. n., Exechia repandoides sp.n. Zusammenfassung Als Teil einer limnologisch-entomologischen Studie wurden mit Hilfe der Gewächshaus -Methode (ILLIES 1971) 134 Arten von Pilzmücken {Diptera, Nematocera,Mycetophi- lidae) in der Nähe von Lunz (Österreich) gesammelt. Eine Liste der Arten mit zusätzlichen Bemerkungen über Fang- daten, Taxonomie und Verbreitungsmuster aller bemer- 173 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at kenswerten Arten wird vorgestellt. Zwei Arten der Liste sind neu für die Wissenschaft: Phthinia plassmanni sp.n., Exechia repandoides sp.n. Die aquatische Entomofauna des Lunzer Seengebietes ist aufgrund der Ergebnisse jahrzehntelanger, intensiver Sammlungs- und Forschungstätigkeit von Mitarbeitern der "Biologischen Station Lunz" die bestbekannte des gesam- ten alpinen Bereichs. Zu diesem hohen Kenntnisstand
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Fungus Gnats for Norway (Diptera, Mycetophilidae)
    © Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 15 December 2009 New records of fungus gnats for Norway (Diptera, Mycetophilidae) GEIR SØLI, EIRIK RINDAL & LARS OVE HANSEN Søli, G., Rindal, E. & Hansen, L. O. 2009. New records of fungus gnats for Norway (Diptera: Mycetophilidae). Norw. J. Entomol. 56, 69–73. Fifteen species of Mycetophilidae are reported new to Norway, and their distribution and biology are commented on. Among the new species, Neuratelia subulata Zaitzev, 1994 has previously not been recorded from the Nordic region. The total number of species of Mycetophilidae in Norway is thus increased to 589. Key words: Diptera, Mycetophilidae, Norway, new records. Geir Søli, Eirik Rindal and Lars Ove Hansen, Natural History museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Introduction Our knowledge about Norwegian Mycetophilidae is rapidly increasing (see Søli & Kjærandsen 2008). Fungus gnats in the family Mycetophilidae form Since the compilation of the first Norwegian check an extremely common and species rich group of list which comprised 473 species (Gammelmo Diptera in northern temperate regions, and our & Søli 2006), as many as 101 more species knowledge about their taxonomy has increased have already been added (Kjærandsen & Jordal considerably during the last two decades (for a 2007, Søli & Kjærandsen 2008). By the present review, see Kjærandsen et al. 2007). Members contribution, our fauna comprises 589 species. of the family expose a rather diverse biology, but Though, compared to the number of species in our know, the majority of species are associated with neighbouring countries, one may assert that a high fungi in one or another way.
    [Show full text]