DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Eat Wild Meat?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Eat Wild Meat? May 2021 Why Eat Wild Meat? Local food choices, food security and desired design features of wild meat alternative projects in Cameroon Author information Stephanie Brittain is a postdoctoral researcher in the Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science (ICCS) at the University of Oxford. [email protected] About the project For more information about the Why Eat Wild Meat? project, visit www.iied.org/why-eat-wild-meat Acknowledgements With thanks to colleagues from the Why Eat Wild Meat? project for their inputs, including Mama Mouamfon (FCTV), Cédric Thibaut Kamogne Tagne (FCTV), E J Milner-Gulland (ICCS), Francesca Booker (IIED), Dilys Roe (IIED), and Neil Maddison (The Conservation Foundation). IIED is a policy and action research organisation. We promote sustainable development to improve livelihoods and protect the environments on which these livelihoods are built. We specialise in linking local priorities to global challenges. IIED is based in London and works in Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and the Pacific, with some of the world’s most vulnerable people. We work with them to strengthen their voice in the decision- making arenas that affect them — from village councils to international conventions. Published by IIED, May 2021 http://pubs.iied.org/20176IIED Citation: Brittain S (2021) Why Eat Wild Meat? Local food choices, food security and desired design features of wild meat alternative projects in Cameroon. Project Report. IIED, London All graphics were created for this report. International Institute for Environment and Development 235 High Holborn, London WC1V 7LE Tel: +44 (0)20 3463 7399 Fax: +44 (0)20 3514 9055 www.iied.org @iied www.facebook.com/theIIED Download more publications at http://pubs.iied.org IIED publications may be shared and republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under the terms of this licence, anyone can copy, distribute and display the material, providing that they credit the original source and don’t use it for commercial purposes or make derivatives. Different licences may apply to some illustrative elements, in which instance the licence will be displayed alongside. IIED is happy to discuss any aspect of further usage. Get more information via www.iied. org/Creative-Commons IIED is a charity registered in England, Charity No.800066 and in Scotland, OSCR Reg No.SC039864 and a company limited by guarantee registered in England No.2188452. PROJECT REPORT, WHY EAT WILD MEAT? MAY 2021 Summary This project report summarises research conducted in four villages around the Dja Faunal Reserve in south-eastern Cameroon. The research aimed to understand local food preferences and the importance of wild meat for food security and explore which kind of wild meat-alternative projects could result in the greatest reduction in household hunting and consumption of wild meat. Differences in the drivers and prevalence of wild meat consumption between individuals, households, and between villages, were investigated using semi-structured interviews. Several hypothetical approaches to designing future wild meat alternative projects were explored using scenario-based interviews. The report outlines our methods and results in detail. We found that younger people consumed wild meat more often than older people. Taste, ease of access and health were the key drivers of species preference, while taste, health, tradition and in some cases, appearance, were the key reasons for species avoidance. The species that people prefer to eat are generally, but not always, abundant and non-protected. In this particular area, household-level alternative projects were preferred, but initiatives may also want to target hunters and younger people, who eat and hunt wild meat more regularly in this area. Overall, alternatives should be viewed by their recipients as providing equal or greater benefits for less effort than hunting, if uptake of these alternatives is to be sustainable. PROJECT REPORT, WHY EAT WILD MEAT? MAY 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Study site 3 3. Overview of research methods and analysis 5 3.1 Data collection 5 3.2 Data analysis 9 3.3 Ethics 11 4. Results 12 4.1 Exploring the importance of wild meat for local food security 12 4.2 Food preferences and drivers of preference 16 4.3 Understanding locally-desired design features of wild meat-alternative projects 28 5. Discussion and wider context 32 5.1 Key drivers of wild meat consumption and avoidance 32 5.2 Individual-level differences in drivers of consumption 34 5.3 Village-level differences in avoidance and consumption 35 5.4 Implications for wild meat alternatives in the Dja Faunal Reserve 35 Bibliography 37 Appendices 40 Appendix 1: The IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria 40 Appendix 2: Full list of preferred and avoided species 41 Appendix 3: The saliency of species cited as ‘avoided’ 45 www.iied.org 1 PROJECT REPORT, WHY EAT WILD MEAT? MAY 2021 1. Introduction The ‘Why Eat Wild Meat’ project was established to explore the complex drivers of wild meat preference and consumption, and the barriers to effective and sustained engagement of wild-meat consumers in alternative projects (Box 1). Funded by the Darwin Initiative, the project is a collaboration between the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), the Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science (ICCS) at the University of Oxford, The Conservation Foundation (formerly the Living Earth Foundation) and the Fondation Camerounaise de la Terre Vivante (FCTV). In making recommendations to project implementers and policy makers, the project aims to improve the design - and hence effectiveness - of wild meat-alternative interventions, thus reducing current levels of exploitation that are threatening both species populations and long-term local food security and nutrition. The primary objectives of the initial project research were to: 1) Identify local people’s food choices and drivers to consume wild meat, (2) Explore the importance of wild meat for local food security, and (3) Understand locally-desired design features of wild meat-alternative projects Box 1: Definition of protein alternatives used in this study We focus on alternatives for wild meat consumption in rural settings, such as wild meat from sustainable sources (sustainable hunting or domestication of wild animals) or the provision of other sources of protein that are considered substitutes by wild meat consumers (CIFOR/CBD 2011). While we do not focus on livelihood alternatives, which seek to provide other sources of income that reduce wildlife trade and reduce pressure on natural resources, we do explore if producing enough alternatives wild meat, so as to be able to sell for additional income, affects household hunting and consumption rates. www.iied.org 2 PROJECT REPORT, WHY EAT WILD MEAT? MAY 2021 2. Study site The Dja Faunal Reserve (DFR) is a World Heritage Site lowland rainforest in south-eastern Cameroon. Encompassing 5260km2 and surrounded on three sides by the Dja River, the DFR is noted for its rich biodiversity (Betti, 2004). The DFR is home to 107 mammal species, five of which are threatened (UNESCO, 2015), including the endangered forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis), the critically endangered western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and endangered central African chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes). See Appendix 1 for an overview of the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Research was conducted in four small to medium sized villages situated around the periphery of the DFR (Figure 1). Village names and locations are not recorded to ensure anonymity at the community level (St John et al., 2016): • Village 1 is the most remote village, located 5km from the periphery of the DFR and only accessible by logging road since 2015. No past or present wild meat alternative projects have taken place within this village, although previous research in the village by the field team showed that residents wish to harness the potential of the new logging road for sustainable development. • Village 2 is the largest of the villages and the most accessible, situated along the length of a road which provides access to market towns of Abong-Mbang, Mindourou and Lomie. It is comprised of three smaller settlements which here we treat as one. In 2019, a community hunting zone was established. However, administrative delays with the development of a management plan mean that people in the neighbouring communities cannot yet benefit from this CHZ. • Villages 3 and 4 are situated on the northern periphery of DFR, approximately 70-80km and 50- 60km from Somalomo, where the Ministry of Forests and Fauna (MINFOF) who are responsible for the management for the DFR, are based. Their presence is well-known by people living along the northern periphery. Residents of both villages are currently actively involved in wild meat and livelihood alternative projects. www.iied.org 3 PROJECT REPORT, WHY EAT WILD MEAT? MAY 2021 Figure 1: Map showing the location of the DFR in Cameroon, and the approximate location of the 4 villages in relation to the reserve. Village 1= no past or present interventions, village 2= Developing community hunting zone (CHZ), villages 3 and 4= currently involved in wild meat alternative projects. www.iied.org 4 PROJECT REPORT, WHY EAT WILD MEAT? MAY 2021 3. Overview of research methods and analysis In a recent review of the current literature on the drivers and barriers to wild meat consumption, Booker (2019) identified a limited number of studies that take an in-depth look at a wide variety of factors determining wild meat preferences, and inter-village and inter-personal differences. As such, we explored wild meat preferences, drivers of current preference, and responses to hypothetical wild meat alternative project scenarios, employing a comparative case study survey design to explore inter-village and inter-personal differences. Differences in the drivers and prevalence of wild meat consumption between individuals (e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dja Faunal Reserve Cameroon
    DJA FAUNAL RESERVE CAMEROON This is one of the largest and best-protected rainforests in Africa, almost completely surrounded by the Dja river which forms its boundary. 90% of its area is still undisturbed. It is one of IUCN’s fifteen critical zones for the conservation of central African biodiversity and as a result of its inaccessibility, its transitional climate, floristic diversity and borderline location retains a rich vertebrate fauna with 109 species of mammals and a wide variety of primates. Threats to the site: Inadequate management has resulted in erosion of biodiversity, a growth of forest exploitation, agricultural clearance and potential pollution from a cobalt mine. COUNTRY Cameroon NAME Dja Faunal Reserve (La Réserve de Faune du Dja) NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SITE 1987: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria ix and x. INTERNATIONAL DESIGNATION 1981: Designated a Biosphere Reserve under the UNESCO Man & Biosphere Programme (526,000 ha). IUCN MANAGEMENT CATEGOCATEGORYRYRYRY VI: Managed Resource Protected Area BIOGEOGRAPHICAL PROVINCE Congo Rain Forest (3.2.1) GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION On and nearly surrounded by the Dja River in the Centre-Sud and Est Provinces of Cameroon, 243 km south-east of the capital, Yaoundé, and 5 km west of Lomié. The river forms a natural boundary except to the northeast. Coordinates: 2 °49'-3°23'N, 12 °25'-13 °35'E. DATES AND HISTORY OF ESTABLISHMENT 1932: The area received some protection. In 1947 certain species within Dja were protected by Decree 2254 which regulated hunting in the French African territories; 1950: Protected as a Réserve de Faune et de Chasse by Arrêté 75/50; 1973: Protected as a Réserve de Faune (623,619 ha) under National Forestry Act Ordinance 73/18.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment Appendix 7B
    Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Appendices Appendix 7: Specialist Studies Appendix 7A: Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment Appendix 7B: Heritage Impact Assessment Appendix 7C: Wetland Delineation Impact Assessment Appendix 7D: Specialist Declaration Forms Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Appendices Appendix 7A: Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment PROPOSED STORMWATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE UMHLANGA RIDGESIDE DEVELOPMENT TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT MARCH 2019 PREPARED FOR: TONGAAT HULETT DEVELOPMENTS Title and Approval Page Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Project Name: Ridgeside Development Report Title: Terrestrial Ecological Assessment Report Authority Reference: - Report Status Draft Applicant Tongaat Hulett Developments Prepared By: Nemai Consulting (Pty) Ltd +27 11 781 1730 147 Bram Fischer Drive, +27 11 781 1731 FERNDALE, 2194 [email protected] PO Box 1673, SUNNINGHILL, www.nemai.co.za 2157 50048-20190307- Terrestrial Report Reference: R-PRO-REP|20170216 Ecological Assessment Report Author: Avhafarei Phamphe Author’s Affiliations Professional Natural Scientist: South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions Ecological Science (400349/2) Professional Member of South African Institute of Ecologists and Environmental Scientists Professional Member: South African Association of Botanists. This Document is Confidential Intellectual Property of Nemai Consulting
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation
    Darwin Initiative Award 15/036: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems MT MABU, MOZAMBIQUE: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION November 2012 Jonathan Timberlake, Julian Bayliss, Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire, Colin Congdon, Bill Branch, Steve Collins, Michael Curran, Robert J. Dowsett, Lincoln Fishpool, Jorge Francisco, Tim Harris, Mirjam Kopp & Camila de Sousa ABRI african butterfly research in Forestry Research Institute of Malawi Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 2 Front cover: Main camp in lower forest area on Mt Mabu (JB). Frontispiece: View over Mabu forest to north (TT, top); Hermenegildo Matimele plant collecting (TT, middle L); view of Mt Mabu from abandoned tea estate (JT, middle R); butterflies (Lachnoptera ayresii) mating (JB, bottom L); Atheris mabuensis (JB, bottom R). Photo credits: JB – Julian Bayliss CS ‒ Camila de Sousa JT – Jonathan Timberlake TT – Tom Timberlake TH – Tim Harris Suggested citation: Timberlake, J.R., Bayliss, J., Dowsett-Lemaire, F., Congdon, C., Branch, W.R., Collins, S., Curran, M., Dowsett, R.J., Fishpool, L., Francisco, J., Harris, T., Kopp, M. & de Sousa, C. (2012). Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation. Report produced under the Darwin Initiative Award 15/036. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. 94 pp. Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 3 LIST OF CONTENTS List of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Central African Forests: an Overview of Knowledge, Main Challenges and Conservation Measures
    CHAPTER 3 BIODIVERSITY IN CENTRAL AFRICAN FORESTS: AN OVERVIEW OF KNOWLEDGE, MAIN CHALLENGES AND CONSERVATION MEASURES Alain Billand CIRAD Introduction As in previous State of the Forest (SOF) reports, the term biodiversity is defined here as “the variability among living organisms in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of the Central African forests”. This definition includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems (according to Hooper et al., 2005). Such a broad definition of biodiversity neces- sitates great modesty on the part of anyone in- terested in acquiring knowledge of biodiversity Dubois © Grégoire and its sustainable management, including plan- ners and researchers. Actually, there continues to ested area in the Congo Basin. There are no spe- Photo 3.1: Area of swamp in be a significant shortage of scientific data on spe- cific biodiversity conservation measures, apart Gabon cies and highly complex ecological systems. from “ordinary” law, for other areas that have This chapter is divided into two parts: no particular status, calling attention to the remaining 60 % of land where biodiversity is • The first part summarizes what is known about under the greatest threat: the main groups and families of fauna. It sup- plements information contained in previous – These are the areas that are the least docu- State of the Forest reports (SOF 2006 and mented; 2008). These reports placed particular empha- – These areas are at the highest risk for defor- sis on improving expertise in monitoring em- estation; blematic biodiversity as well as its conservation: – These areas may have high economic poten- this concerns a small number of animal species, tial for agricultural expansion or increasing mainly large mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • '1 Tanganyika
    '1 TANGANYIKA . EXHIB TION HANDBOOK V611 N2 H 004191 ~ -­ ,·~tt'.· . r:-. · . FLAX HEMP SISAL .. JUTE ALL DESCRIPTIONS Wi 82, ~1: VIS: Av· ONDON." ys, DUNDE::·--- --- -- -L -IV_E_R_ P_O_O_ L_ =-:-,..._ -r-... ~15 : 6, Euclid Crescent. 9. P · ,on C ourt, sa. Rue J ean- BELFAST : Cr Street. Jacques Rossea~~o Textile Building, I ~ YORK: BOLOGNA: L inenhall Street. s... •roadway. Via Oegli, Artieri No. a. CONTENTS PAGK OF TUB TERRITORY I ION' OF TilE TERRITORY:­ ion ••• 9 lte ••• II f-;~~crip.~.~n :-... ... 15 !Vegetation ••• ••• ••• 15 \nimals, Wild and Tame •.• 18 De Human Element ••• 19 ~owns and Communications 19 cts ••• ••• · 2l ,1 and Sanitation 31 ltunications :­ <ailways ••• 35 .:.oads 40 ~'osts and Telegraphs 40 l•lC ... · 4Z ~uages 47 51 l:tain.;.;~ng sB [lini_stration and Law 62 cation ••• ••• 6J .TURE:- eral ••• .... 69 ive Agricultural Industry 70 Plantation Industry 78 ::>NDITIONS 91 L OF EX·ENEMY PROPERTY 93 CoNDITIONS,,, 96 .TURAL ASSISTANCE ••• 97 AND CATTLE PRODUCTS ,,;, 99 y 107 AND MINERALS IIJ ( i.i I A• CONTENTS Geaeral ... ••• . ••• -· ••• Commen:ial Aooodatlous uul Fl.- ... Plantas' Aalciatl0111 and ~lemben ••• Castollll ••• - .;. :Ouiks Hotels and Shops ... ... ... APPENDIXES L Imports uul Exports II. Cenlus ••• III. Roada ..., JV. Admiaistratlve Districts and Sub-Districts v .. Details of Saleo ol ex-Enemy Property ... VI. :RaiDfRII _ ... vu. Game ••• · VUL Native Wooda IX. List of Book• Having Reference to the Territory X. Lisi of PubHcatloa~ Iasned la tbe Territocy XI. Weights uul Measures of tbe Territory ... XII. List ol Exh.iblton and Exhibits ... _ ... ·Map ol the Territory. Map Showing the Chief District. of the Principal Exporlll, ( iv) 2 HISTORY OF THE TERRITOR'\ of the conquering Arabs, it disappeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Summary 4071 Dja Faunal Reserve
    WORLD KERlTAGE NOMINATION -- IUCN SUMMARY 4071 DJA FAUNAL RESERVE (CAMERON) Summary prepared by IUCN (April 1987) based on the original nomination submitted by Cameroon. This original and all documents presented in support of this nomination will be available for consultation at the meetings of the Bureau and the Committee. 1. LOCATION, On the Dja River in the Central-Southern and Eastern Provinces of Cameroon, 243km south-east of Yaoundg, and 5km west of Lomie. 2'49'-3'23'N, 12'25'-13'35'E. 2. JURIDICAL DATA: Protected as a 'rgserve de faune et de chasse' in 1950, and then as a IrEserve de faune' under the National Forestry Act Ordinance 1973. Accepted as a Biosphere Reserve in 1981. Proposed as a National Park. Asea is 526,000 ha. 3. IDENTIFICATIONI The Dja reserve is virtually encircled by the Dja River which flows west along the long northern boundary of the reserve, and then along the southern boundary, before flowing southeast as a tributary to the Congo. Cliffs run along the course of the river in the south for some 6Okm, and are associated with a section of the river broken up by rapids and waterfalls. Except in the south-east of the reserve, the relief is fairly flat and consists of a succession of round-topped hills. The vegetation mainly comprises dense evergreen Congo rainforest with a main canopy at 30-40m rising to 60m. Some 43 species of tree form the canopy, with legumes being particulary common. The area is known to have a wide range of primate species including lowland gorilla, greater white-nosed guenon, moustached guenon, crowned guenon, talapoin, white-collared mangabey, white-cheeked mangabey, agile mangabey, drill, mandrill, potto, Demdorff's galago, black and white colobus monkey and chimpanzee.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Modern Law and Local Tradition in Forest Heritage
    PhD Thesis Modern Law and Local Tradition in Forest Heritage Conservation in Cameroon: The Case of Korup A thesis approved by the Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Process Engineering at the Brandenburg University of Technology in Cottbus in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the academic degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Environmental Sciences by Master of Arts Terence Onang Egute from Oshie, Momo Division, Northwest Region, Cameroon Supervisor: Prof. Dr. iur. Eike Albrecht Department of Civil and Public Law with References to the Law of Europe and the Environment, BTU Cottbus, Germany Supervisor: Prof. Dr. hab. Konrad Nowacki Department of Environmental Law and Comparative Administrative Law, University of Wroclaw, Poland Day of the oral examination: 26.11.2012 DOKTORARBEIT Modernes Recht und Lokale Traditionen bei der Erhaltung des Walderbes in Kamerun: Eine Fallstudie über Korup Von der Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften und Verfahrenstechnik der Brandenburgischen Technischen Universität Cottbus genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie (Ph.D.) in Umweltwissenschaften vorgelegt von Master of Arts Terence Onang Egute aus Oshie, Momo Division, Northwest Region, Kamerun Gutachter: Prof. Dr. iur. Eike Albrecht Lehrstuhl Zivil- und Öffentliches Recht mit Bezügen zum Umwelt- und Europarecht der BTU Cottbus, Deutschland Gutachter: Prof. Dr. hab. Konrad Nowacki Lehrstuhl Umweltrecht und Vergleichendes Verwaltungsrecht der Universität Wroclaw, Polen Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 26.11.2012 Modern Law and Local Tradition in Forest Heritage Conservation in Cameroon: The Case of Korup Declaration I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my original research carried out at the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Germany within the framework of the doctorate programme Environmental and Resource Management.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Environmental Knowledge Among Two Rural Black Communities in Natal
    AN INVESTIGATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE AMONG TWO RURAL BLACK COMMUNITIES IN NATAL Submitted in partial fulfIlment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF EDUCATION of Rhodes University by CYNTHIA SIBONGISENI MTSHALI February 1994 . , I i ABSTRACT This study elicits and documents knowledge of the natural environment amongst two rural Black communities in Natal namely, the districts of Maphumulo and Ingwavuma.Twenty members of these communities who are older than 60 years of age were interviewed, as older people are considered by the researcher to be important repositories of environmental knowledge. This study records a variety of animals hunted in these communities and discusses various activities associated with this activity. It examines the gathering and the use of wild edible plants like fruits and spinach, and of wild plants alleged to have medicinal value. It reviews indigenous knowledge related to 1 custom beliefs and prohibitions as well as traditional laws associated .with animals an9 trees. It also considers how this knowledge can contribute towards the development of Environmental Education in South Africa. The data was deduced from the responses elicited from semi-structured interviews. The data was analyzed qualitatively. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract Table of Contents ii List of Figures and Tables vi Acknowledgements vii ,-- - CHAPTER 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 The Purpose and Background to the Study 1 1.3 The Statement of the Problem 3 1.4 Clarification of Concepts 4 1.4.1 Indigenous knowledge 4 1.4.2 Sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Mineral Exploitation and Associated Trade on Wildlife in the Dja-Boumba Mining Area East Cameroon
    THE IMPACTS OF MINERAL EXPLOITATION AND ASSOCIATED TRADE ON WILDLIFE IN THE DJA-BOUMBA MINING AREA EAST CAMEROON Quarter Report By L.C.Makazi November, 2010 i Executive Summary This study examines the impacts of mineral exploitation and associated trade on wildlife in the Dja-Boumba mining area of east Cameron in 2010. The Dja Faunal Reserve (World Heritage Site) of east Cameroon has the only remaining large block of unlogged forest in the country but the sale of mining permits at the periphery are on the rise. Mineral exploitation and associated trade on wildlife has led to a tremendous devastation of the ecological setting in this zone, hence rending the environment almost useless for wildlife survival. The goal of the study was to survey the mining environment and assess the degree of threat to the endangered wildlife species in the area. The method was based on line transect sampling which allowed the determination of species composition, distribution and levels of human disturbance in the proportion of their estimated occurrence in the study area. Questionnaires were used to investigate knowledge, attitudes and practices of the local population towards mining and the utilization of wildlife in three villages. This gave an account of hunting pressure, associated trade on wildlife and other human activities found to modify wildlife population densities. A total of sixteen wildlife species were confirmed, four were listed in the IUCN Red Data Book (IUCN, 2008) and four species listed in the IUCN Red List of threatened species. Two species were listed in class A and four in class B of the Cameroon legislation (MINFOF, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Mabira Degazettement Report.Pdf
    Series No. 7 THE ECONOMIC VALUATION OF THE PROPOSED DEGAZETTEMENT OF MABIRA CENTRAL FOREST RESERVE NatureUganda Lead Consultants Dr. Yakobo Moyini Mr. Moses Masiga The Economic Valuation of the Proposed Degazettement of Mabira Central Forest Reserve With support from THE ECONOMIC VALUATION OF THE PROPOSED DEGAZETTEMENT OF MABIRA CENTRAL FOREST RESERVE Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized only with further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2011). The Economic Valuation of the Proposed Degazettement of Mabira Central Forest Reserve. NatureUganda Kampala Copyright ©NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Plot 83 Tufnel Drive Kamwokya. Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This consultancy builds on NatureUganda earlier studies to identify important biodiversity areas in Uganda or key biodiversity areas. Thirty three (33) Important Bird Areas were identified including Mabira Forest Reserve. In this study, we make a case that policy formulation about natural resources needs to be informed with facts in the present and full knowledge of the future or predicted long term consequences. We are grateful to BirdLife International Partnership particularly Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) whose initial support enabled NatureUganda to undertake this study on the economic evaluation of a section of Mabira Forest Reserve that was proposed for Degazzettement. The research work falls under our advocacy programme supported by various partners including BirdLife International through Jansen’s Foundation programme on ‘turning policy advantages into conservation gains’.
    [Show full text]
  • OCCASIONAL PAPERS CENTRE of AFRICAN STUDIES Edinburgh University
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS A Short History of Wildlife Conservation in Malawi Brian Morris CENTRE OF AFRICAN STUDIES Edinburgh University Price: E 6.00 or U S $ 12.00 A SHORT HISTORY OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION IN MALAWI Brian Morris Centre of African Studies Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh CONTENTS 1. THE EARLY COLONIAL PERIOD 1 2. THE POST WAR YEARS 24 3. G.D. HAYES AND THE NYASALAND FAUNA PRESERVATION SOCIETY 38 4. THE POST-COLONIAL ERA 54 5. CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES ON WILDLIFE CONSERVATION 7 8 References Dr Brian Morris Reader in Anthropology Goldsmiths College University of London New Cross London SE14 6NW I A SHORT HISTORY OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION IN MALAWI 1. TEE EARLY COLONIAL PERIOD Recent histiography has shown that in the early part of the nineteenth century southern Malawi was a well populated region, particularly along the lakeshore and in the Lower Shire Valley. The area was the focus of developed trade routes, a complex agricultural system which used dry season cultivation in low lying areas (dimba) and where iron-working was a flourishing industry, to be'commented upon favourably by Livingstone (1865; 536). While iron production was mainly in the highlands, there was a developed cotton economy in the Lower Shire Valley (Mandala 1990; 36-63). By the end of the century, however, the increasing ravages of the slave trade after 1840, the advent of the militaristic Ngoni, and the incursion of Yao traders into the Shire Highlands, all adversely affected population distribution and disrupted the economy of the area. This led many people to take refuge in such places as high on the mountains of Zomba and Mulanje, or on Chisi Island, in Lake Chilwa.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Forest Antelope Population Densities Using Distance Sampling with Camera Traps
    Estimating forest antelope population densities using distance sampling with camera traps R AJAN A MIN,HANNAH K LAIR,TIM W ACHER,CONSTANT N DJASSI A NDREW F OWLER,DAVID O LSON and T OM B RUCE Abstract Traditional transect survey methods for forest ante- concealed in dense vegetation, and the spoor and droppings lopes often underestimate density for common species and do are difficult to identify to species level with confidence (Rovero not provide sufficient data for rarer species. The use of camera & Marshall, ; Croes et al., ; van Vliet et al., ; trapping as a survey tool for medium and large terrestrial Jost Robinson et al., ). DNA-based amplification of mammals has become increasingly common, especially in for- species-specific mitochondrial DNA fragments from drop- esthabitats.Here,weappliedthedistancesamplingmethodto pings is possible, but time-consuming, expensive, and largely images generated from camera-trap surveys in Dja Faunal impractical with currently available analysis techniques (e.g. Reserve, Cameroon, and used an estimate of the proportion Breuer & Breuer-Ndoundou Hockemba, ;Bowkettetal., of time animals are active to correct for negative bias in the ; Bourgeois et al., ). Here, we present a method based density estimates from the -hour camera-trap survey data- on distance sampling with images from camera traps to sets. We also used multiple covariate distance sampling with obtain density estimates of forest antelopes. We demonstrate body weight as a covariate to estimate detection probabilities its use for monitoring the status of threatened forest antelopes and densities of rarer species. These methods provide an ef- in the Dja Faunal Reserve, southern Cameroon. fective tool for monitoring the status of individual species or a community of forest antelope species, information urgently Study area needed for conservation planning and action.
    [Show full text]