DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment Appendix 7B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment Appendix 7B Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Appendices Appendix 7: Specialist Studies Appendix 7A: Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment Appendix 7B: Heritage Impact Assessment Appendix 7C: Wetland Delineation Impact Assessment Appendix 7D: Specialist Declaration Forms Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Appendices Appendix 7A: Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment PROPOSED STORMWATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE UMHLANGA RIDGESIDE DEVELOPMENT TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT MARCH 2019 PREPARED FOR: TONGAAT HULETT DEVELOPMENTS Title and Approval Page Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Project Name: Ridgeside Development Report Title: Terrestrial Ecological Assessment Report Authority Reference: - Report Status Draft Applicant Tongaat Hulett Developments Prepared By: Nemai Consulting (Pty) Ltd +27 11 781 1730 147 Bram Fischer Drive, +27 11 781 1731 FERNDALE, 2194 [email protected] PO Box 1673, SUNNINGHILL, www.nemai.co.za 2157 50048-20190307- Terrestrial Report Reference: R-PRO-REP|20170216 Ecological Assessment Report Author: Avhafarei Phamphe Author’s Affiliations Professional Natural Scientist: South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions Ecological Science (400349/2) Professional Member of South African Institute of Ecologists and Environmental Scientists Professional Member: South African Association of Botanists. This Document is Confidential Intellectual Property of Nemai Consulting (Pty) Ltd © copyright and all other rights reserved by Nemai Consulting (Pty) Ltd This document may only be used for its intended purpose Amendments Page Amendment Date: Nature of Amendment Number: 19 May 2017 First Draft for Client Review 01 02 November 2018 Second Draft for Client Review 02 Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Terrestrial Ecological Assessment Report Executive Summary Introduction The Umhlanga Ridgeside Development received Environmental Authorisation in 2007 for a mixed land use development. The development will consist of residential, commercial and open space development. This development will also include the construction of internal services such as sewage, water and electricity, the construction of stormwater management services, the construction of new roads and intersection, as well as the upgrading of existing roads and intersection. Tongaat Hulett has appointed Nemai Consulting to undertake a Basic Assessment Process for the proposed stormwater and sewer reticulation to serve the lower portion of Precinct 2 and Precinct 4, and Hatch (Civil Engineers) has provided various options. A Terrestrial Ecological Assessment was undertaken in order to assess the impacts that the proposed development will have on the receiving environment. Objectives The objective of this study was to identify sensitive species and their habitats along the proposed infrastructure alternatives. The current ecological status and conservation priority of vegetation in the study area was assessed. Potential faunal habitats were investigated in the study area and all mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians known to occur in the study area or seen on site were recorded. Red data species (both fauna and flora) that are known to occur in the study area were investigated. Relevant Legislation and Guidelines The study considered the relevant environmental legislation that may have bearing on the project. Study Area and Project Description The proposed development is located in Umhlanga Ridgeside, within the eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality (EMM) of KwaZulu-Natal Province. The alternatives considered for the proposed stormwater and sewer infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development are discussed. Regional Vegetation The proposed infrastructure alternatives fall within the Forest and Indian Ocean Coastal belt biomes Grassland Biome, and traverse two vegetation types, namely the endangered KwaZulu-Natal Coastal Belt Grassland and the critically endangered KwaZulu-Natal Dune Forests: East Coast Dune Forest. - Page iv March 2019 Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Terrestrial Ecological Assessment Report Terrestrial Threatened Ecosystems According to the data sourced from SANBI, the critically endangered Northern Coastal Grasslands was listed as the only terrestrial threatened ecosystem recorded along the proposed infrastructure alternatives. KwaZulu-Natal Biodiversity Spatial Planning According to KwaZulu-Natal Biodiversity Spatial Planning, the proposed infrastructure alternatives fall within the KwaZulu-Natal Critical Biodiversity Area (CBA): Irreplaceable and also within the Durban Metropolitan Open Space System areas. No CBA Optimal and Ecological Support Areas were found to occur within the study area. Natural forest The proposed infrastructure alternatives are located in or adjacent to a pristine forest area. Only the periphery of the forest area is dominated by alien invasive plant species. The National Forests Act of 1998 (as amended) provides the strongest and most comprehensive legislation and mandate for the protection of all natural forests in South Africa. Section 7 of the Act prohibits the cutting, disturbance, destruction or removal of any indigenous living or dead tree in a forest without a licence. The Act is enforced by Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF). Protected Areas The study area does not fall within or near any protected area. Durban Metropolitan Open Space System The proposed infrastructure alternatives fall within areas denoted as a Durban Metropolitan Open Space System (D’MOSS) area. D’MOSS is a network of natural open spaces, defined by the EMM as critical for the ecosystem goods and services that they supply to the residents of the municipal area. D’MOSS aims to conserve local biodiversity and to ensure the supply of environmental services for current and future generations. Limitations and Gaps The study highlighted the limitations and gaps associated with the study. Methodology Survey methodology included a comprehensive desktop review, utilising available provincial ecological data, relevant literature, GIS databases, topographical maps and aerial photography. This was then supplemented through a ground-truthing phase, where pertinent areas associated with the various infrastructure alternatives were visited during field surveys undertaken during flowering seasons April 2017 (Autumn) and follow up visit in February 2018 (Summer). The survey focused on flora (vegetation) and fauna (mammals, avifauna and reptiles). Several Orange Listed floral and Red Data faunal species pertaining to the study area were identified during the desktop review. Habitat suitability was assessed through the ground-truthing phase of the surveys. - Page v March 2019 Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Terrestrial Ecological Assessment Report Results and Discussion - Flora During the field surveys, no threatened species or species of conservation importance were observed along the proposed infrastructure alternatives. In terms of the National Forests Act (Act No. 84 of 1998), certain tree species have been identified and declared as “protected species”. DAFF has developed a list of protected tree species in the Act. One such species recorded on site was Mimusops caffra. This tree can be avoided by shifting the proposed sewer infrastructure alternatives 1 and 3 within the required servitude. However, a permit for either removing, destroying or disturbing this plant will be acquired from DAFF before any construction commences if avoidance is not possible. In order to reduce the impacts on the protected tree, the Applicant should purchase at least 10 medium to large sized Mimusops caffra on removal of the existing Coast Red Milkwood, and plant on the property as part of landscaping. The proposed infrastructure alternatives traverse through the KwaZulu-Natal Dune Forest. Results and Discussion - Fauna The proposed sewer infrastructure alternatives 1 and 3 fall within the highly disturbed area mostly dominated by alien plants and situated also along the main road, whereas the proposed stormwater infrastructure alternatives (and also proposed Sewer infrastructure alternative 2) are situated along the natural forest. Mammal species are known to occur within the forest areas. Table 7 lists all animals recorded during the survey. Six mammal species were recorded and only one species of conservation importance was noted in the area, namely Red forest Duiker (also known as Natal Red Duiker). This species was seen along the proposed forest edges. Conservation and planning tools were reviewed for relevancy in terms of the project area, and it was found that the study area did not contain or form part of any Important Bird and Biodiversity Area. An avifaunal study indicated that the forest areas provided suitable habitats for species recorded on site. No bird species of conservation concern were noted on site along the proposed infrastructure alternatives. Large areas surrounding the proposed sewer infrastructure alternatives have resulted in increased habitat modification and transformation due to construction of roads and mixed used residential areas. The forest vegetation provides suitable habitat for several arboreal reptile species such as Boomslang (Dispholidus typus typus), Spotted Bush Snake (Philothamnus variegatus),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Citing George Orwell, Michael Radu States That
    13 Scientia Militaria vol 40, no 3, 2012, pp.13-39. doi : 10.5787/40-3-1041 Accolades and Albatrosses: The South African National Defence Force’s Centenary and the Commemoration of Milestones in South African Military History Deon Visser • Abstract Peoples, societies, institutions and other entities frequently record their histories in terms of successive epochs, and commemorate those histories according to perceived milestones or turning points in their development. Since much of human history has been dominated by strife and warfare, national and international milestones are frequently embedded in notions of a military past. Milestones in military history may be divided into three broad categories, namely those representing significant strides in the evolution of warfare, those associated with bravery, heroic sacrifice and great loss, and those of decisive political importance. Defence forces in general, and individual military units in particular, are extremely conscious of their past and often commemorate milestones through customs, traditions, and splendid parades and ceremonial displays. This year (2012), the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) celebrates its centenary against the complex background of South Africa’s long history of internal strife interspaced with participation in foreign conflicts. This article reflects on the commemoration of South Africa’s military history within the context of the divergent historical heritages of the SANDF and its predecessors. It commences with a brief background on memory, identity and the commemoration of history and military history. Thereafter it outlines the commemoration of a few of the foremost milestones in South African • Lieutenant Colonel GE Visser is an associate professor of Military History at the Faculty of Military Science, Stellenbosch University (South African Military Academy).
    [Show full text]
  • A.E. Cubbin Dtpartmt'nt of History Universityof Zululand
    A.E. Cubbin Dtpartmt'nt of History Universityof Zululand THEfact that it had been decided to celebrateDurban's 150th anniversaryin 1985,makes it interesting to r~-examinethe nascentyears of that urban complex in orde.rto ascenainthe exactdate of its establishmentand who its founders were. FYNN'S ORIGINAL SETTLEMENT MAY 1824 Henry Francis Fynw was the leader of the vanguard of Lieutenant Francis George Farewell's2trading and settling expedition to Pon Natal. Fynn wasthe supercargo of a small sloop,Julia, which arrived at the bay ofPon Natal from Cape Town during May 1824.3 Fynn's arrival ahead of Farewell with the stores was primarily to establish what wasto become the firSt permanent European settlement at Pon Natal. With Lieutenant James Saunders King, Farewell had realized as a result of an expedition to the south-easternshores of Mrica the previous year that Pon Natal wasthe only viable harbour for small vessels between Algoa Bay and Delagoa Bay.4 With Fynn came three 'mechanics': the F;nglishman Henry Ogle, the Prussian Catl August Zinke and an un- One of Fynn's priorities wasto meet the local inhabitants. known Frenchman. He was also accompanied by a couple With Frederick's assistancethey managed to establish contact of indispensable servants,the ColouredsJantyi Oantjie?) and with the reluctant Mahamba (alias Matubane, alias Fica), Michael, and Frederick, a Black interpreter from the Eastern regent of the emaTulini (later amaTuli) tribe of approximately Cape Frontier.5 60 members who were inhabiting the fastness of isiBubu- lungu (nowadays known as the Bluff).8 These people were the destitute vassalsof Shaka, King of the Zulu, eking out a precarious living on the Bluff.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation
    Darwin Initiative Award 15/036: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems MT MABU, MOZAMBIQUE: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION November 2012 Jonathan Timberlake, Julian Bayliss, Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire, Colin Congdon, Bill Branch, Steve Collins, Michael Curran, Robert J. Dowsett, Lincoln Fishpool, Jorge Francisco, Tim Harris, Mirjam Kopp & Camila de Sousa ABRI african butterfly research in Forestry Research Institute of Malawi Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 2 Front cover: Main camp in lower forest area on Mt Mabu (JB). Frontispiece: View over Mabu forest to north (TT, top); Hermenegildo Matimele plant collecting (TT, middle L); view of Mt Mabu from abandoned tea estate (JT, middle R); butterflies (Lachnoptera ayresii) mating (JB, bottom L); Atheris mabuensis (JB, bottom R). Photo credits: JB – Julian Bayliss CS ‒ Camila de Sousa JT – Jonathan Timberlake TT – Tom Timberlake TH – Tim Harris Suggested citation: Timberlake, J.R., Bayliss, J., Dowsett-Lemaire, F., Congdon, C., Branch, W.R., Collins, S., Curran, M., Dowsett, R.J., Fishpool, L., Francisco, J., Harris, T., Kopp, M. & de Sousa, C. (2012). Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation. Report produced under the Darwin Initiative Award 15/036. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. 94 pp. Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 3 LIST OF CONTENTS List of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Eat Wild Meat?
    May 2021 Why Eat Wild Meat? Local food choices, food security and desired design features of wild meat alternative projects in Cameroon Author information Stephanie Brittain is a postdoctoral researcher in the Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science (ICCS) at the University of Oxford. [email protected] About the project For more information about the Why Eat Wild Meat? project, visit www.iied.org/why-eat-wild-meat Acknowledgements With thanks to colleagues from the Why Eat Wild Meat? project for their inputs, including Mama Mouamfon (FCTV), Cédric Thibaut Kamogne Tagne (FCTV), E J Milner-Gulland (ICCS), Francesca Booker (IIED), Dilys Roe (IIED), and Neil Maddison (The Conservation Foundation). IIED is a policy and action research organisation. We promote sustainable development to improve livelihoods and protect the environments on which these livelihoods are built. We specialise in linking local priorities to global challenges. IIED is based in London and works in Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and the Pacific, with some of the world’s most vulnerable people. We work with them to strengthen their voice in the decision- making arenas that affect them — from village councils to international conventions. Published by IIED, May 2021 http://pubs.iied.org/20176IIED Citation: Brittain S (2021) Why Eat Wild Meat? Local food choices, food security and desired design features of wild meat alternative projects in Cameroon. Project Report. IIED, London All graphics were created for this report. International Institute for Environment and Development 235 High Holborn, London WC1V 7LE Tel: +44 (0)20 3463 7399 Fax: +44 (0)20 3514 9055 www.iied.org @iied www.facebook.com/theIIED Download more publications at http://pubs.iied.org IIED publications may be shared and republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Relief of the Siege of Fort Port Natal
    RELIEF OF THE SIEGE OF FORT PORT NATAL Researched and written by Udo Richard AVERWEG Saturday 24th June 2017 marked the 175th anniversary of the arrival of the schooner Conch to the Bay of Natal (now known as Durban harbour). The ship’s arrival from Algoa Bay (now known as Port Elizabeth) on 24th June 1842, was instrumental in raising the month-long siege of the British garrison at Fort Port Natal (now known as The Old Fort, Durban). (Entrance plaque to present day Old Fort, Durban) In 1824 there was a settlement on the northern side of the Bay of Natal under the leadership of British Lt F G Farewell (1784 – 1829). Lt Farewell had established Port Natal as a place for ships travelling to India to stop and also to trade with the Zulus for ivory. With the arrival of migrant Voortrekkers (Afrikaner Boers, mainly of Dutch descent) from the Cape Colony at Port Natal, they sought to set up the Natalia Republiek with an independent port of entry, free from British control. At the Battle of Congella on 23rd/24th May 1842, these insurgent Boers had conquered the Port Natal trading settlement. However, the governor of the Cape Colony wanted to take military repossession of Port Natal and prevent the Afrikaner Boers establishing an independent republic on the coast and with a harbour through which access to the interior could easily be gained. P a g e 1 | 6 After the Battle of Congella, the besieged British force of ‘Redcoats’ (as the Boers termed the 27th (Inniskilling) Regiment of Foot1), under the command of Capt Thomas Charlton Smith (1794 – 1883) at Fort Port Natal, was in a perilous state: their food was running out and they were subsisting on biscuit crumbs and a handful of rice.
    [Show full text]
  • '1 Tanganyika
    '1 TANGANYIKA . EXHIB TION HANDBOOK V611 N2 H 004191 ~ -­ ,·~tt'.· . r:-. · . FLAX HEMP SISAL .. JUTE ALL DESCRIPTIONS Wi 82, ~1: VIS: Av· ONDON." ys, DUNDE::·--- --- -- -L -IV_E_R_ P_O_O_ L_ =-:-,..._ -r-... ~15 : 6, Euclid Crescent. 9. P · ,on C ourt, sa. Rue J ean- BELFAST : Cr Street. Jacques Rossea~~o Textile Building, I ~ YORK: BOLOGNA: L inenhall Street. s... •roadway. Via Oegli, Artieri No. a. CONTENTS PAGK OF TUB TERRITORY I ION' OF TilE TERRITORY:­ ion ••• 9 lte ••• II f-;~~crip.~.~n :-... ... 15 !Vegetation ••• ••• ••• 15 \nimals, Wild and Tame •.• 18 De Human Element ••• 19 ~owns and Communications 19 cts ••• ••• · 2l ,1 and Sanitation 31 ltunications :­ <ailways ••• 35 .:.oads 40 ~'osts and Telegraphs 40 l•lC ... · 4Z ~uages 47 51 l:tain.;.;~ng sB [lini_stration and Law 62 cation ••• ••• 6J .TURE:- eral ••• .... 69 ive Agricultural Industry 70 Plantation Industry 78 ::>NDITIONS 91 L OF EX·ENEMY PROPERTY 93 CoNDITIONS,,, 96 .TURAL ASSISTANCE ••• 97 AND CATTLE PRODUCTS ,,;, 99 y 107 AND MINERALS IIJ ( i.i I A• CONTENTS Geaeral ... ••• . ••• -· ••• Commen:ial Aooodatlous uul Fl.- ... Plantas' Aalciatl0111 and ~lemben ••• Castollll ••• - .;. :Ouiks Hotels and Shops ... ... ... APPENDIXES L Imports uul Exports II. Cenlus ••• III. Roada ..., JV. Admiaistratlve Districts and Sub-Districts v .. Details of Saleo ol ex-Enemy Property ... VI. :RaiDfRII _ ... vu. Game ••• · VUL Native Wooda IX. List of Book• Having Reference to the Territory X. Lisi of PubHcatloa~ Iasned la tbe Territocy XI. Weights uul Measures of tbe Territory ... XII. List ol Exh.iblton and Exhibits ... _ ... ·Map ol the Territory. Map Showing the Chief District. of the Principal Exporlll, ( iv) 2 HISTORY OF THE TERRITOR'\ of the conquering Arabs, it disappeared.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Congella
    REMEMBERING DURBAN’S HISTORICAL TAPESTRY – THE BATTLE OF CONGELLA Researched and written by Udo Richard AVERWEG Tuesday 23rd May 2017 marks an important date in Durban’s historical tapestry – it is the dodransbicentennial (175th) anniversary of the commencement of the Battle of Congella in the greater city of Durban. From a military historical perspective, the Congella battle site was actually named after former Zulu barracks (known as an ikhanda), called kwaKhangela. This was established by King Shaka kaSenzangakhona (ca. 1787 – 1828) to keep a watchful eye on the nearby British traders at Port Natal - the full name of the place was kwaKhangela amaNkengane (‘place of watching over vagabonds’). Shortly after the Battle of Blood River (isiZulu: iMpi yaseNcome) on 16th December 1838, Natalia Republiek was established by the migrant Voortrekkers (Afrikaner Boers, mainly of Dutch descent). It stretched from the Tugela River to the north to present day Port St Johns at the UMzimvubu River to the south. The Natalia Republiek was seeking an independent port of entry, free from British control by conquering the Port Natal trading settlement, which had been settled by mostly British traders on the modern-day site of Durban. However, the governor of the Cape Province, Maj Gen Sir George Thomas Napier KCB (1784 - 1855), stated that his intention was to take military possession of Port Natal and prevent the Afrikaner Boers establishing an independent republic upon the coast with a harbour through which access to the interior could be gained. The Battle of Congella began on 23rd May 1842 between British troops from the Cape Colony and the Afrikaner Boer forces of the Natalia Republiek.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2018
    National Boer War Memorial Association National Patron: Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin AC Volume 1, Issue 1 Chief of the Defence Force Monumentally Speaking - Queensland Edition Committee Newsletter - Volume 11, No. 1 Queensland Chairman’s Report Welcome to our first Queensland Newsletter of 2018; in The inaugural meeting of the new committee was held on th fact, the first newsletter of the new committee. Monday, 27 November, 2017, at the Sherwood- Indooroopilly RSL Sub-Branch. I am Gordon Bold, Chairman of the new Queensland Committee. Just to keep you up to speed, a little back- In Queensland, we are hoping to evolve into some form of ground first, leading up to the appointment of a new a Boer War „Descendants & Supporters‟ Association (a committee… new name is yet to be finalised). The new committee intend meeting quarterly. However, at the moment we Now that the Boer War Memorial in Canberra has been are still under the guidance and advice of previous com- built and dedicated, the role of the Queensland Boer mittee members as the NBWMA still exists, due to a num- War Memorial Association (QBWMA) needed to revisit ber of issues that need resolution, prior to 30th June, its charter. Was it to be disbanded, now that the Mem- 2018. It is envisaged the NBWMA will then step down. orial in Canberra is complete, or continued, with a differ- ent charter? The Committee decided to continue with the previous th financial support arrangements. Members are invited to On Sunday 17 September, a meeting was held at the show their support by continuing their financial contribu- Sherwood-Indooroopilly RSL Sub-Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kafirs Illustrated in a Series of Drawings Taken Among the Amazulu
    rd 'd wm*£ ^vov-; mmp w^Y lr-^>Y/ w^o R^foYcViToT^T-'f Y fWimm’ YiF^-v1^^ T\l / W av/jBkw Mkl'MSwi t* If. ^iy 'Sf '■r/— m' £ ,W! - vy AWjraV mnw ***• W Mf P|£1E| a J& ip| jpl ay. d esa pPE ^PtIa 'ijrAll)rvV|f\i'^MuOiMIwVaV/ y/jVV yj ■ f ltf VI * & 9 I/S mm M^SE3f W./!>.iMr s-\U _ liX l jj dfc i.7 Jt.W/'O AU 1 *pv;“ [f^S fa y. Pi 1 fe1 ‘W1 flu \ A r r\'H hh, fa A d w 1m r YT^wtiiT l|o|2®p wnifWW . ■ ' THE KAFIRS ILLUSTRATED 2-D. •srnro of D min mgs TAKEN AMONG THE AMAZULU, AMAPON DA. AND AMAKOSA TRIBES ; A LSI), Portrait* OF THE HOTTENTOT, MALAY, FINGO, AND OTHER RACES INHABITING SOUTHERN AFRICA : TOGETHER WITH SKETCHES OF LANDSCAPE SCENERY IN THE ZULU COUNTRY. NATAL. AND THE CAPE COLONY. BY GEORGE FRENCH ANGAS, AUTHOR AUSTRALIA ILLUSTRATED ; “ THE NEW ZEALANDERS ILLUSTRATED;" “ SAVAGE LIEU AND SOLVES ; ” A TAI E OF REAL LIFE ; *’ “ A RAMBLE IN MALTA AND SICILY," ETC. I Lo! where he crouches by the Kloof's dark side. Eyeing the farmer's lowing herds afar; Impatient watching till the evening star Leads forth the twilight dim, that he may glide Like panther to the prey. With free horn pride He scorns the herdsman, nor regards the sear Of recent wound; but burnishes for war Ilis assagai and targe of buffalo hide." Piiim.le LONDON: PUBLISHED BY J. HOGARTH, H A Y M A R K ET.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Environmental Knowledge Among Two Rural Black Communities in Natal
    AN INVESTIGATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE AMONG TWO RURAL BLACK COMMUNITIES IN NATAL Submitted in partial fulfIlment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF EDUCATION of Rhodes University by CYNTHIA SIBONGISENI MTSHALI February 1994 . , I i ABSTRACT This study elicits and documents knowledge of the natural environment amongst two rural Black communities in Natal namely, the districts of Maphumulo and Ingwavuma.Twenty members of these communities who are older than 60 years of age were interviewed, as older people are considered by the researcher to be important repositories of environmental knowledge. This study records a variety of animals hunted in these communities and discusses various activities associated with this activity. It examines the gathering and the use of wild edible plants like fruits and spinach, and of wild plants alleged to have medicinal value. It reviews indigenous knowledge related to 1 custom beliefs and prohibitions as well as traditional laws associated .with animals an9 trees. It also considers how this knowledge can contribute towards the development of Environmental Education in South Africa. The data was deduced from the responses elicited from semi-structured interviews. The data was analyzed qualitatively. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract Table of Contents ii List of Figures and Tables vi Acknowledgements vii ,-- - CHAPTER 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 The Purpose and Background to the Study 1 1.3 The Statement of the Problem 3 1.4 Clarification of Concepts 4 1.4.1 Indigenous knowledge 4 1.4.2 Sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • Remainder of Rocklands Farm No
    Proposed Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ Remainder of Rocklands Farm No. 1020 Rocklands, South Peninsula, City of Cape Town Visual Impact Assessment Draft Report ver. 1.4 June 2017 Prepared for: KHULA Environmental Consultants PO Box 22761, Scarborough, 7975 Cell: 082 322 4074 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Megan Anderson Landscape Architect PO Box 517, Bredasdorp, 7280 Tel: 028 425 1350 Cell: 083 651 6419 TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 1 INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE REPORT 9 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE, POLICIES AND GUIDELINES 9 1.2.1 GUIDELINES FOR INVOLVING VISUAL AND AESTHETIC SPECIALISTS IN EIA PROCESSES: EDITION 1 (OBERHOLZER, 2005) 9 1.2.2 THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (PSDF, 2013) 11 1.2.3 HERITAGE AND SCENIC RESOURCES: INVENTORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR THE WESTERN CAPE (OBERHOLZER AND WINTER, 2013) 11 1.2.4 CAPE TOWN SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (CTMSDF, 2012 ) 11 1.2.5 SCENIC DRIVE NETWORK MANAGEMENT PLAN, VOL 3 (CITY OF CAPE TOWN, 2003) 12 1.2.6 TMNP: CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2006-2001 (SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL PARKS, 2008) 13 1.2.7 DEA&DP GUIDELINE FOR MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ON MOUNTAINS, HILLS & RIDGELINES 13 1.3 METHODOLOGY 14 1.4 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 14 2 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 15 2.1 SITE LOCATION 15 2.2 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION 15 2.2.1 LAYOUT 1 (SEE FIGURES 3 AND 4) 17 2.2.2 LAYOUT 2 (SEE FIGURES 5 AND 6) 17 2.2.3 NO-GO ALTERNATIVE (SEE FIGURE 7) 17 3 VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • 560 Curry Road, Durban
    Curry Road 560 FIRST PHASE HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF 560 CURRY ROAD, ETHEKWENI MUNICIPALITY. ACTIVE HERITAGE cc. For: DMI Attorneys Frans Prins MA (Archaeology) P.O. Box 947 Howick 3290 [email protected] 30 December 2019 Fax: 0867636380 Active Heritage CC i Curry Road 560 Details and experience of independent Heritage Impact Assessment Consultant Consultant: Frans Prins (Active Heritage cc) Contact person: Frans Prins Physical address: 33 Buchanan Street, Howick, 3290 Postal address: P O Box 947, Howick, 3290 Telephone: +27 033 3307729 Mobile: +27 0834739657 Fax: 0867636380 Email: [email protected] PhD candidate (Anthropology) UKZN MA (Archaeology) University of Stellenbosch 1991 Hons (Archaeology) University of Stellenbosch 1989 University of KwaZulu-Natal, Honorary Lecturer (School of Anthropology, Gender and Historical Studies). Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists member Frans received his MA (Archaeology) from the University of Stellenbosch and is presently a PhD candidate on social anthropology at UKZN. His PhD research topic deals with indigenous San perceptions and interactions with the rock art heritage of the Drakensberg. Frans was employed as a junior research associate at the then University of Transkei, Botany Department in 1988-1990. Although attached to a Botany Department he conducted a palaeoecological study on the Iron Age of northern Transkei - this study formed the basis for his MA thesis in Archaeology. Frans left the University of Transkei to accept a junior lecturing position at the University of Stellenbosch in 1990. He taught mostly undergraduate courses on World Archaeology and research methodology during this period. From 1991 – 2001 Frans was appointed as the head of the department of Historical Anthropology at the Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg.
    [Show full text]