DOCSLIB.ORG

Remainder of Rocklands Farm No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Remainder of Rocklands Farm No Proposed Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ Remainder of Rocklands Farm No. 1020 Rocklands, South Peninsula, City of Cape Town Visual Impact Assessment Draft Report ver. 1.4 June 2017 Prepared for: KHULA Environmental Consultants PO Box 22761, Scarborough, 7975 Cell: 082 322 4074 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Megan Anderson Landscape Architect PO Box 517, Bredasdorp, 7280 Tel: 028 425 1350 Cell: 083 651 6419 TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 1 INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE REPORT 9 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE, POLICIES AND GUIDELINES 9 1.2.1 GUIDELINES FOR INVOLVING VISUAL AND AESTHETIC SPECIALISTS IN EIA PROCESSES: EDITION 1 (OBERHOLZER, 2005) 9 1.2.2 THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (PSDF, 2013) 11 1.2.3 HERITAGE AND SCENIC RESOURCES: INVENTORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR THE WESTERN CAPE (OBERHOLZER AND WINTER, 2013) 11 1.2.4 CAPE TOWN SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (CTMSDF, 2012 ) 11 1.2.5 SCENIC DRIVE NETWORK MANAGEMENT PLAN, VOL 3 (CITY OF CAPE TOWN, 2003) 12 1.2.6 TMNP: CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2006-2001 (SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL PARKS, 2008) 13 1.2.7 DEA&DP GUIDELINE FOR MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ON MOUNTAINS, HILLS & RIDGELINES 13 1.3 METHODOLOGY 14 1.4 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 14 2 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 15 2.1 SITE LOCATION 15 2.2 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION 15 2.2.1 LAYOUT 1 (SEE FIGURES 3 AND 4) 17 2.2.2 LAYOUT 2 (SEE FIGURES 5 AND 6) 17 2.2.3 NO-GO ALTERNATIVE (SEE FIGURE 7) 17 3 VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 18 3.1 VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE, ITS ENVIRONS AND SCENIC RESOURCES (SEE PHOTO PLATES 1-10) 18 3.1.1 THE VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ENVIRONS (SEE PHOTO PLATES 1-10) 18 3.1.2 THE VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE (SEE PHOTO PLATES 1-10) 19 3.1.3 THE VISUAL RESOURCES (SEE PHOTO PLATES 1-10) 20 3.2 VISIBILITY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 21 3.2.1 VIEW CATCHMENT (SEE FIGURE 8) 21 3.2.2 ZONE OF VISUAL INFLUENCE 21 MALA VIA: Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ ver 1.4 2 3.3 RECEPTORS (SEE PHOTO PLATES 15-19) 23 3.3.1 HIGHLY SENSITIVE RECEPTORS 23 3.3.2 MODERATELY SENSITIVE RECEPTORS 23 3.4 VISUAL SENSITIVITY 24 3.4.1 TOPOGRAPHY (SEE FIGURE 10) 24 3.4.2 LANDFORM (SEE FIGURE 11) 25 3.4.3 VEGETATION COVER 25 3.4.4 LANDUSE 26 3.4.5 SPECIAL FEATURES 26 3.4.6 OVERALL VISUAL SENSITIVITY (SEE FIGURE 12) 27 3.5 VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPACITY 27 3.6 VISUAL INTRUSION 28 4 POTENTIAL VISUAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 29 4.1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 30 4.1.1 VISUAL SCARRING ON MOUNTAIN SLOPES (RESULTING FOR THE SITE CAMP AND CUT AND FILL SLOPES FOR THE ACCESS ROAD AND BUILDINGS PLATFORMS) 30 4.2 OPERATION PHASE 31 4.2.1 CHANGE IN VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE SITE (FROM AN UNDEVELOPED TO A DEVELOPED SITE) 31 4.2.2 POTENTIAL VISUAL INTRUSION OF LOWER AREA (RESTAURANT, PARKING AREA, REFUSE ROOM AND ACCESS ROAD) ON THE M4 SCENIC TOURIST ROUTE 32 4.2.3 VISIBILITY FROM SENSITIVE RECEPTORS 33 VISIBILITY FROM SENSITIVE RECEPTORS –ROCKLANDS CAMP 33 4.2.4 VISUAL INTRUSION OF LIGHTING AT NIGHT 34 4.3 CUMULATIVE IMPACT 35 5 MITIGATION MEASURES 36 5.1 DURING CONSTRUCTION: 36 5.2 DURING OPERATION 36 6 CONCLUSION 38 7 REFERENCES 39 APPENDIX 1 CURRICULUM VITAE OF VISUAL SPECIALIST 40 APPENDIX 2 FIGURES 1 - 9 45 APPENDIX 3: Visual Resources PHOTO PLATES 1 – 10 52 MALA VIA: Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ ver 1.4 3 APPENDIX 4: Views from site PHOTO PLATES 11 – 14 56 APPENDIX 5: Viewpoints FIGURE 10 AND PHOTO PLATES 15 – 19 58 APPENDIX 6: Montages PHOTO PLATES 20-24 60 APPENDIX 7: Visual Sensitivity Mapping FIGURES 11 - 13 69 MALA VIA: Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ ver 1.4 4 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE MALA VIA: Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ ver 1.4 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Low-intensity Ecotourism Development, ‘Whale Rock’, is proposed on the remainder of Rocklands Farm No. 1020 Rocklands, South Peninsula, City of Cape Town. Khula Environmental Consultants are undertaking the Environmental Application for the proposed development in terms of NEMA. Megan Anderson Landscape Architects has prepared this Visual Impact Assessment (VIA). The proposed development comprises a low-intensity ecotourism accommodation facility comprising 6 accommodation units supported by a Spa, manager’s office and restaurant for the exclusive use by the guests. Located lower down the slope a restaurant, open to the public, and a cookery school are proposed. An access road off the M4 Main Road will meander up the slope past the “public” restaurant to the accommodation units higher up the slope. The proposed development will be serviced by connecting to the available municipal service infrastructure. The scenic resources of the site can be described as naturally vegetated mountain slopes and are rated as HIGH. The Zone of Visual Influence varies between 500m in the west to 8kms to the east and can be described as LOCAL. The Receptors within the ZVI are inclusive of those rated as HIGHLY and MODERATELY sensitive. The inherent Visual Sensitivity of the site ranges from LOW to HIGH. Most of the site has a moderate visual sensitivity with smaller areas of low and high visual sensitivity. The VAC of the site ranges from LOW to MODERATE i.e. little to partial screening. The Visual Intrusion of the proposed development is MODERATE i.e. partially fits into the surroundings but would be clearly noticeable. The potential Visual Impacts are tabled below: MALA VIA: Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ ver 1.4 6 Layout 1 Layout 2 No-Go Option Significance Significance Significance Significance Significance Significance before after mitigation before after mitigation before after mitigation mitigation mitigation mitigation a. Visual scarring on mountain slopes during construction Moderate to Moderate Moderate to Moderate NA NA High High b. Change of Visual character from undeveloped to partly developed Moderate to Low to Moderate to Low to NA NA High Moderate High Moderate c. Visual intrusion of lower area (restaurant, parking area, refuse room and access road) on the M4 scenic tourist route Moderate to Low to Moderate Low to NA NA High Moderate Moderate d. Visibility from sensitive receptors Moderate to Low to Moderate to Low to NA NA High Moderate High Moderate e. Visual intrusion of lighting at night Moderate to Low to Moderate to Low to NA NA High Moderate High Moderate Mitigation measures that will assist in minimising visual impacts are: Retain existing naturally occurring fynbos vegetation; Minimise disturbance through fencing off construction areas; Design access road so that fill slopes are created in favour of large cut slopes; Site the construction camps in less visually obtrusive areas; Appoint a professionally registered Landscape Architect to prepare a Landscape Plan that will enhance the proposed development plan and further mitigate visual impacts; Landscape measures to include planting of indigenous trees and shrubs to screen buildings from the north (Rocklands), south (Miller’s Point) and between the lower area restaurant and M4 roadway but not such that views of the sea from the restaurant would be intercepted; Final road surface on visually exposed slopes (e.g. steep sections of the road such as those between the lower and upper development) must be visually recessive i.e. a dark, muted colour. A lighter, natural stone-coloured finish such as exposed aggregate pavers may be used on flatter, more visually enclosed areas (e.g. parking area and on roads in the top area of development). The appointed Landscape Architect is to advise in this regard. Boundary treatments (fencing/walls) must be visually permeable; Omit street lighting External lighting should be bollard lighting; and MALA VIA: Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ ver 1.4 7 The luminaires must be top covered, low spill type lights to minimize light spill and pollution. The potential cumulative visual impact will be minimal if the proposed mitigation measures are implemented. While the site of the proposed Whale Rock Ecotourism development is visually sensitive, the siting and scale of the proposed components is sensitively placed and resulting visual impacts can be sufficiently mitigated. Layout 2 is marginally preferred to Layout 1 from a visual perspective as the restaurant, despite being closer to the M4 road, is situated at a lower elevation. In our opinion, the proposed development, if mitigated as suggested, is acceptable from a visual perspective. MALA VIA: Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ ver 1.4 8 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background to the Report The applicant, Kieron Taylor, proposes a Low-intensity Ecotourism Development ‘Whale Rock’ on the remainder of Rocklands Farm No. 1020 Rocklands, South Peninsula, City of Cape Town. Khula Environmental Consultants are undertaking the Environmental Application for the proposed development in terms of NEMA. Megan Anderson Landscape Architects has been appointed to undertake a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) for the proposed development. 1.2 Terms of Reference, Policies and guidelines 1.2.1 Guidelines for involving visual and aesthetic specialists in EIA processes: Edition 1 (Oberholzer, 2005) In terms of the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning’s guidelines for involving visual and aesthetic specialists in EIA processes, a level 3 to 4 VIA is required for this proposed development. This requirement is based on: o The nature of the receiving environment: Areas with protection status, such as national parks or nature reserves; Areas with proclaimed heritage sites or scenic routes; Areas with intact wilderness qualities, or pristine ecosystems; Areas with a recognized special character or sense of place; Areas lying outside a defined urban edge line; Areas of important tourism or recreation value; Areas with important vistas or scenic corridors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment Appendix 7B
    Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Appendices Appendix 7: Specialist Studies Appendix 7A: Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment Appendix 7B: Heritage Impact Assessment Appendix 7C: Wetland Delineation Impact Assessment Appendix 7D: Specialist Declaration Forms Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Ridgeside Development Appendices Appendix 7A: Terrestrial Ecological Impact Assessment PROPOSED STORMWATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE UMHLANGA RIDGESIDE DEVELOPMENT TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT MARCH 2019 PREPARED FOR: TONGAAT HULETT DEVELOPMENTS Title and Approval Page Proposed Stormwater and Sewer Infrastructure for the Umhlanga Project Name: Ridgeside Development Report Title: Terrestrial Ecological Assessment Report Authority Reference: - Report Status Draft Applicant Tongaat Hulett Developments Prepared By: Nemai Consulting (Pty) Ltd +27 11 781 1730 147 Bram Fischer Drive, +27 11 781 1731 FERNDALE, 2194 [email protected] PO Box 1673, SUNNINGHILL, www.nemai.co.za 2157 50048-20190307- Terrestrial Report Reference: R-PRO-REP|20170216 Ecological Assessment Report Author: Avhafarei Phamphe Author’s Affiliations Professional Natural Scientist: South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions Ecological Science (400349/2) Professional Member of South African Institute of Ecologists and Environmental Scientists Professional Member: South African Association of Botanists. This Document is Confidential Intellectual Property of Nemai Consulting
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Gazette • Provinsiale Koerant • Igazethi Yesifundazwe
    KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINSIE ISIFUNDAZWE SAKWAZULU-NATALI Provincial Gazette • Provinsiale Koerant • Igazethi Yesifundazwe (Registered at the post office as a newspaper) • (As ’n nuusblad by die poskantoor geregistreer) (Irejistiwee njengephephandaba eposihhovisi) PIETERMARITZBURG Vol: 15 1 JULY 2021 No: 2301 1 JULIE 2021 PART 1 OF 3 N.B. The Government Printing Works will ISSN 1994-4551 not be held responsible for the quality of 02300 “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771994 455008 2 No. 2301 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE, 1 JULY 2021 IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS THAT MIGHT OCCUR DUE TO THE SUBMISSION OF INCOMPLETE / INCORRECT / ILLEGIBLE COPY. NO FUTURE QUERIES WILL BE HANDLED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ABOVE. Contents Gazette Page No. No. No. PROVINCIAL NOTICES • PROVINSIALE KENNISGEWINGS 66 Road Carrier Permits: KwaZulu-Natal ................................................................................................................ 2301 3 MUNICIPAL NOTICES • MUNISIPALE KENNISGEWINGS 41 Local Government: Municipal Property Rates Act, 2004: Dannhauser Municipality: Resolution levying property rates in terms of section 14 of the Act ................................................................................................................ 2301 153 48 Local Government: Municipal Property Rates Act, 2004: Template: Resolution levying property rates for the financial year 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Gazette • Provinsiale Koerant • Igazethi Yesifundazwe
    KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINSIE ISIFUNDAZWE SAKWAZULU-NATALI Provincial Gazette • Provinsiale Koerant • Igazethi Yesifundazwe (Registered at the post office as a newspaper) • (As ’n nuusblad by die poskantoor geregistreer) (Irejistiwee njengephephandaba eposihhovisi) PIETERMARITZBURG Vol: 15 26 AUGUST 2021 No: 2318 26 AUGUSTUS 2021 PART 1 OF 3 N.B. The Government Printing Works will ISSN 1994-4551 not be held responsible for the quality of 02318 “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771994 455008 2 No. 2318 PROVINCIAL GaZETTE, 26 AUGUST 2021 IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS THAT MIGHT OCCUR DUE TO THE SUBMISSION OF INCOMPLETE / INCORRECT / ILLEGIBLE COPY. NO FUTURE QUERIES WILL BE HANDLED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ABOVE. Contents Gazette Page No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICES • ALGEMENE KENNISGEWINGS 14 Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act, 1996 (Act No 3 of 1996): Various Properties ............................................ 2318 3 15 Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act (SPLUMA) 2013 (Act 16 of 2013): Mandeni Local Municipality Draft Spatial Development Framework (SDF) ................................................................................ 2318 10 16 Local Government: Municipal Property Rates Act, 2004: Resolution Levying Property Rates for the Financial Year 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022 ...................................................................................................................... 2318 11 MUNICIPAL
    [Show full text]
  • 853 16-11 Kzn Transport G6
    KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE RKEPUBLICWAZULU-NATAL PROVINSIEREPUBLIIEK OF VAN SOUTHISIFUNDAZWEAFRICA SAKWAZULUSUID-NATALI-AFRIKA Provincial Gazette • Provinsiale Koerant • Igazethi Yesifundazwe GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY—BUITENGEWONE KOERANT—IGAZETHI EYISIPESHELI (Registered at the post office as a newspaper) • (As ’n nuusblad by die poskantoor geregistreer) (Irejistiwee njengephephandaba eposihhovisi) PIETERMARITZBURG, 16 NOVEMBER 2012 Vol. 6 16 KULWEZI 2012 No. 853 We oil hawm he power to preftvent kllDc AIDS HEIRINE 0800 012 322 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Prevention is the cure N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 201402—A 853—1 2 Extraordinary Provincial Gazette of KwaZulu-Natal 16 November 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the sender’s respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. Page No. ADVERTISEMENT Road Carrier Permits, Pietermaritzburg........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]