Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation Darwin Initiative Award 15/036: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems MT MABU, MOZAMBIQUE: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION November 2012 Jonathan Timberlake, Julian Bayliss, Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire, Colin Congdon, Bill Branch, Steve Collins, Michael Curran, Robert J. Dowsett, Lincoln Fishpool, Jorge Francisco, Tim Harris, Mirjam Kopp & Camila de Sousa ABRI african butterfly research in Forestry Research Institute of Malawi Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 2 Front cover: Main camp in lower forest area on Mt Mabu (JB). Frontispiece: View over Mabu forest to north (TT, top); Hermenegildo Matimele plant collecting (TT, middle L); view of Mt Mabu from abandoned tea estate (JT, middle R); butterflies (Lachnoptera ayresii) mating (JB, bottom L); Atheris mabuensis (JB, bottom R). Photo credits: JB – Julian Bayliss CS ‒ Camila de Sousa JT – Jonathan Timberlake TT – Tom Timberlake TH – Tim Harris Suggested citation: Timberlake, J.R., Bayliss, J., Dowsett-Lemaire, F., Congdon, C., Branch, W.R., Collins, S., Curran, M., Dowsett, R.J., Fishpool, L., Francisco, J., Harris, T., Kopp, M. & de Sousa, C. (2012). Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation. Report produced under the Darwin Initiative Award 15/036. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. 94 pp. Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 3 LIST OF CONTENTS List of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. 4 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ 5 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Media Coverage.............................................................................................................. 9 2. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA ................................................................................... 10 2.1 Geography and Geology ............................................................................................... 10 2.2 Climate ......................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Aerial Photos ................................................................................................................ 13 3. HISTORY AND EARLY COLLECTING .......................................................................... 13 3.1 Early History ................................................................................................................ 14 3.2 Recent History .............................................................................................................. 16 4. VEGETATION .. ................................................................................................................. 19 4.1 Previous Studies ........................................................................................................... 19 4.2 Vegetation Mapping ..................................................................................................... 19 4.3 Vegetation Types .......................................................................................................... 22 4.3.1 Plantations ............................................................................................................. 22 4.3.2 Woodland .............................................................................................................. 22 4.3.3 Moist Forest .......................................................................................................... 23 4.3.4 Montane shrubland ............................................................................................... 27 4.3.5 Vegetation of the Drier Western and Northern Slopes ......................................... 29 4.4 Forest Plots ................................................................................................................... 29 4.5 Observations on Tree Fruiting ...................................................................................... 29 5. PLANTS .............................................................................................................................. 33 5.1 Previous Studies ........................................................................................................... 33 5.2 Plant Collections ........................................................................................................... 33 5.3 Species of Particular Interest ........................................................................................ 34 6. BIRDS ................................................................................................................................. 37 6.1 Previous Studies ........................................................................................................... 37 6.2 Bird Survey ................................................................................................................... 37 6.3 Biogeographical Significance ....................................................................................... 37 6.4 Bird Species of Conservation Importance .................................................................... 39 6.5 Bird Breeding Records ................................................................................................. 41 7. OTHER VERTEBRATES & INVERTEBRATES ............................................................. 43 7.1 Previous Studies ........................................................................................................... 43 7.2 Larger Mammals .......................................................................................................... 43 7.3 Bats ............................................................................................................................... 43 7.4 Other Small Mammals .................................................................................................. 44 7.5 Herpetofauna ................................................................................................................ 45 7.6 Lepidoptera ................................................................................................................... 47 7.7 Molluscs ....................................................................................................................... 49 7.8 Freshwater Crustacea.................................................................................................... 49 7.9 Biogeography ............................................................................................................... 50 Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 4 8. CONSERVATION .............................................................................................................. 51 8.1 Conservation Threats .................................................................................................... 51 8.2 Protection and Conservation......................................................................................... 54 9. MAIN FINDINGS ............................................................................................................... 56 10. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 57 11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 59 12. BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES ............................................................................... 60 Annex 1. Participants on main Mt Mabu, October 2008 ......................................................... 66 Annex 2. Media Coverage of Mt Mabu ................................................................................... 67 Annex 3. Plant checklist for Mt Mabu above 800 m ............................................................... 71 Annex 4. Annotated list of bird species on Mt Mabu recorded above 400 m .......................... 77 Annex 5. Birds ringed near main forest camp on Mt Mabu, 16‒17 Oct 2008 ......................... 84 Annex 6. List of larger mammal species recorded from the Mabu massif .............................. 85 Annex 7. List of small mammal species collected or recorded from the Mabu massif ........... 87 Annex 8. List of reptile and amphibian species collected or recorded from the Mabu massif 88 Annex 9. Butterfly species collected on Mt Mabu from 2006 to 2010 .................................... 89 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Main visits to Mt Mabu, 2005‒2010 ............................................................................ 9 Table 2. Extent of area above 1000 m by altitudinal class for the Mt Mabu massif ................ 10 Table 3. Tea enterprises in the Mt Mabu area, with 1960 production figures ......................... 16 Table 4. Extent of forest area by altitudinal class for the Mt Mabu massif ............................. 20 Table 5. Summary of forest plot data, Mt Mabu .....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 ISSN: 2340-4078 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Mendes, L. F.; Sousa, A. Bivar de; Vasconcelos, S. New data on the butterflies of São Tomé e Príncipe: description of one new subspecies from Príncipe, notes, and reference to two faunistic novelties from São Tomé (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 46, no. 181, 2018, June-March, pp. 65-74 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45560385006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Revta. lepid., 46 (181) marzo 2018: 65-74 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 New data on the butterflies of São Tomé e Príncipe: description of one new subspecies from Príncipe, notes, and reference to two faunistic novelties from São Tomé (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) L. F. Mendes, A. Bivar de Sousa & S. Vasconcelos Abstract One new subspecies of Sevenia amulia (Cramer, 1777) (Nymphalidae, Biblidinae) is described from Príncipe Island and compared with the previously known subspecies. Two faunistic novelties are reported from São Tomé Island and for the country: one species of Lycaenidae (Polyommatinae), another of Nymphalidae (Heliconiinae). The presence on Príncipe Island of another species, an endemic Hesperiidae (Hesperiinae) not reported from the country for almost a century, is confirmed and commented. KEY-WORDS: Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, new subspecies, faunistic novelties, new data, São Tomé e Príncipe.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding Cannot Reliably Identify Species of the Blowfly Genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
    DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). T. L. Whitworth, R. D. Dawson, Hélène Magalon, E. Baudry To cite this version: T. L. Whitworth, R. D. Dawson, Hélène Magalon, E. Baudry. DNA barcoding cannot reli- ably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae).. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2007, 274 (1619), pp.1731-1739. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0062. hal-00941689 HAL Id: hal-00941689 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00941689 Submitted on 6 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae) T. L. Whitworth1, R. D. Dawson2, H. Magalon3 and E. Baudry4,* 1Washington State University, 2533 Inter Avenue, Puyallup, WA 98372, USA 2University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia V2N 4Z9, Canada 3Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Universite´ Paris VI, Paris 75252, France 4Laboratoire Ecologie, Systematique et Evolution, Universite´ Paris-Sud, Baˆtiment 362, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France In DNA barcoding, a short standardized DNA sequence is used to assign unknown individuals to species and aid in the discovery of new species.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolbachia Endosymbiont Infection in Two Indian Butterflies and Female-Biased Sex Ratio in the Red Pierrot, Talicada Nyseus
    Wolbachia endosymbiont infection in two Indian butterflies and female-biased sex ratio in the Red Pierrot, Talicada nyseus 1 2 1, KUNAL ANKOLA , DOROTHEA BRUECKNER and HP PUTTARAJU * 1Division of Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India 2Department of Biology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany *Corresponding author (Email, [email protected]) The maternally inherited obligate bacteria Wolbachia is known to infect various lepidopteran insects. However, so far only a few butterfly species harbouring this bacterium have been thoroughly studied. The current study aims to identify the infection status of these bacteria in some of the commonly found butterfly species in India. A total of nine butterfly species belonging to four different families were screened using PCR with Wolbachia-specific wsp and ftsZ primers. The presence of the Wolbachia super group ‘B’ in the butterflies Red Pierrot, Talicada nyseus (Guerin) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and Blue Mormon, Papilio polymnestor Cramer (Papilionidae), is documented for the first time in India. The study also gives an account on the lifetime fecundity and female-biased sex ratio in T. nyseus, suggesting a putative role for Wolbachia in the observed female-biased sex ratio distortion. [Ankola K, Brueckner D and Puttaraju HP 2011 Wolbachia endosymbiont infection in two Indian butterflies and female-biased sex ratio in the Red Pierrot, Talicada nyseus. J. Biosci. 36 845–850] DOI:10.1007/s12038-011-9149-3 1. Introduction infected by Wolbachia. It has been shown that the presence of particular clades of Wolbachia cause feminization and The maternally inherited endosymbiotic α–proteobacteria cytoplasmic incompatibility in the common grass yellow called Wolbachia is known to infect 15%–75% of insect butterfly, Eurema hecabe (Hiroki et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Acraea (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) - Peter Hendry
    The genus Acraea (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) - Peter Hendry With the recent migration to Australia of the Tawny Coster (Acraea terpsicore (Linnaeus, 1758)), (see Creature Feature this issue), I thought it might be timely to take a look at the genus worldwide. It must be noted that due to a misidentification A. terpsicore had long been known as A. violae and many references in the literature and on the web refer to it as A. violae. As with much of the Lepidoptera the genus is in a state of flux, and has long been split into the subgenera Acraea (Acraea) and Acraea (Actinote). The genus is placed in the tribe Acraeini and until Harvey (1991) placed it in the subfamily Heliconiinae it was listed in the subfamily Acraeinae. Recent molecular work has made changes and a current listing of the tribe Acraeini, by Niklas Wahlberg, is available at http://www.nymphalidae.net/Classification/Acraeini.htm. It shows members of the old subgenus Acraea (Actinote) being placed in the genus Actinote, and the old subgenus Acraea (Acraea) becoming the genus Acraea with a subgenus Acraea (Bematistes). It also lists several Acraea as unplaced. This may further change as some believe the subgenus Acraea (Bematistes) will move to the genus Bematistes. The genus is primarily Afrotropical with only four species occurring outside this region, these being, Acraea andromacha (Fig. 1) A. meyeri (Fig. 10) A. moluccana and A. terpsicore. A fifth species the Yellow Coster Acraea (Actinote) issoria is now referred to the genus Actinote. Like many of the Nymphalidae the larvae feed on plants which contain cyanogens making the larvae and adults poisonous to predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full-Text
    Research in Zoology 2015, 5(2): 32-37 DOI: 10.5923/j.zoology.20150502.02 First Records of Butterfly Diversity on Two Remote Islands on the Volta Lake of Ghana, the Largest Reservoir by Total Surface Area in the World Daniel Opoku Agyemang1, Daniel Acquah-Lamptey1,*, Roger Sigismond Anderson2, Rosina Kyerematen1,2 1Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 2African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana Abstract The construction of the Akosombo Dam in Ghana for hydroelectric energy led to the creation of many islands on the Volta Lake. The biological diversity on these islands is unknown and so a rapid assessment was conducted in January 2014 as part as a region wide assessment to determine the butterfly diversity on two of these islands, Biobio and Agbasiagba. Diversity indices were computed for both islands using the Shannon-Weiner index, Margalef’s index for richness and Whittaker’s index for comparison of diversity between the two islands. A total of eight hundred and eighty-one (881) individual butterflies representing forty-five (45) species belonging to eight (8) families were recorded during the study. Thirty-nine (39) species of butterflies were recorded on Biobio island whiles twenty-eight (28) species were recorded on Agbasiagba. This was expected as the larger islands are expected to support more species than smaller ones, with Biobio island being relatively bigger than Agbasiagba. The shared species of butterflies on both islands were twenty-two (22) representing 48.9% of the total species accumulated. Indicator species like Junonia oenone, Danaus chrysippus and Papilio demodocus were also recorded indicating the degraded floral quality of the Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Butterfly Fauna of Three Varying Habitats in South Western Nigeria
    FUTA Journal of Research in Sciences, 2015 (1): 1 - 6 THE BUTTERFLY FAUNA OF THREE VARYING HABITATS IN SOUTH WESTERN NIGERIA *K.A. Kemabonta, A.S. Ebiyon and F. Olaleru Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria *Email of corresponding Author: [email protected] or [email protected] ABSTRACT Species diversity and abundance of butterflies were investigated at three (3) locations; Ajebo, Ogun State, Odongunyan Farm Settlement, Ikorodu and Hortico Gardens, Ipaja, Lagos using sweep nets and transects method of sampling. Biodiversity indices were calculated using Shannon-Wiener, Margalef, Simpson’s and Equitability indices. A total of 1105 butterflies belonging to 11 genera and 4 families were identified from the 3 sampled sites. Butterflies belonging to the family Nymphalidae were the most abundant, accounting for 70.6% of the total butterflies collected in all locations and seasons. Four species Danaus chrysippus, Acraea serena, Melanargia galathea (Nymphalidae) and Eurema sp. (Pieridae) were found in the three sites. Acraea (200), Danaus (140), Melanargia (129) (all in the family Nymphalidae) were the most abundant butterfly genera found in the study sites. Ajebo had the least diversity of butterflies in all the two seasons, while Hortico Gardens, Ipaja had the highest. Odongunyan farm land was the most equitable (j = 1.09) of the three sampled sites. Keywords: diversity, butterflies, Nymphalidae, transects, sweep nets INTRODUCTION human existence and development (Kehinde et Butterflies are very well known for their al., 2014). beauty as their wings are of various colour Lepidoptera is the third most diverse insect patterns. They are pollinators (Vane-Wright et order (following Coleoptera and Diptera) al., 1991), silk producers for textile products (Gullan and Cranston, 2000), with 70 families (Erhardt, 1985) and good indicators of the and 140,000 species; 20,000 of which are ecological quality of a habitat (Cleary, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Acraea Wigginsi Occidentalis (Bethune-Baker, 1926), a New
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Tropek, R.; Jansta, P.; Lestina, D. Acraea wigginsi occidentalis (Bethune-Baker, 1926), a new butterfly for Nigeria, with remarks on its habitat and known distribution (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 41, núm. 161, marzo, 2013, pp. 163-165 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45528755014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 163-165 Acraea wigginsi occiden 10/3/13 19:00 Página 163 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 41 (161), marzo 2013: 163-165 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN: 0300-5267 Acraea wigginsi occidentalis (Bethune-Baker, 1926), a new butterfly for Nigeria, with remarks on its habitat and known distribution (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) R. Tropek, P. Jansta & D. Lestina Abstract Acraea wigginsi occidentalis (Bethune-Baker, 1926) is recorded in Nigeria for the first time, in the Gotel Mountains, close to the Cameroonian border. All of its known distribution is summarized, including four new records from Cameroon. Its occurrence in the degraded submontane grasslands is also discussed as the reason why it has been rarely observed. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Acraeini, Afromontane butterflies, Cameroon Volcanic Line, faunistics, Nigeria. Acraea wigginsi occidentalis (Bethune-Baker, 1926), una nueva mariposa para Nigeria, con indicaciones sobre su habitat y distribución conocidea (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Resumen Se cita por primera vez para Nigeria a Acraea wigginsi occidentalis (Bethune-Baker, 1926), en las Montañas Gotel, próximas al borde cameroniano.
    [Show full text]
  • 392 Genus Actizera Chapman
    AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES 17th edition (2018). MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Genus Actizera Chapman, 1910 Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1910: 483 (479-497). Type-species: Lycaena atrigemmata Butler, by monotypy. The genus Actizera belongs to the Family Lycaenidae Leach, 1815; Subfamily Polyommatinae Swainson, 1827; Tribe Polyommatini Swainson, 1827; Subtribe incertae sedis. The other genera in the Subtribe incertae sedis in the Afrotropical Region are Cupidopsis, Pseudonacaduba, Catochrysops, Lampides, Uranothauma, Cacyreus, Harpendyreus, Leptotes, Cyclyrius, Tuxentius, Tarucus, Zintha, Zizeeria, Zizina, Zizula, Brephidium, Oraidium, Azanus, Eicochrysops, Euchrysops, Orachrysops, Lepidochrysops, Thermoniphas and Oboronia. Actizera (Blues) is a purely Afrotropical genus containing four species. *Actizera atrigemmata (Butler, 1878) Lycaena atrigemmata Butler, 1878. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (5) 2: 290 (283-297). Actizera atrigemmata Butler, 1878. d’Abrera, 2009: 816. Type locality: Madagascar: “Fianarantsoa”. Distribution: Madagascar. Specific localities: Madagascar – Fianarantsoa (TL). Habitat: Transformed grassland (Lees et al., 2003). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. Note: Larsen (2005a) suggests that this taxon may be a subspecies of Actizera lucida. *Actizera drucei (Bethune-Baker, 1906) Zizera [sic] drucei Bethune-Baker, 1906. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (7) 17: 109 (104-110). Actizera lucida drucei (Bethune-Baker, 1906). Stempffer, 1967: 262-63. Synonym of Actizera lucida (Trimen, 1883). Ackery et al., 1995. Actizera drucei (Bethune-Baker, 1906). Lees et al., 2003. stat. rev. Type locality: Madagascar: “Madagascar”. Distribution: Madagascar. Specific localities: Madagascar – Sirabe (probably Antsirabe) (Lees et al., 2003). Habitat: Transformed grassland (Lees et al., 2003). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. Note: Not listed by d’Abrera, 2009: 816.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Agulhas Plain
    Birds of the Agulhas Plain www.blackoystercatcher.co.za Birds of the Agulhas Plain – how to see them “Whether you love bird-watching or not, a trip to the Black Oystercatcher will always include a vast array of bird life en route.” www.blackoystercatcher.co.za The Black Oystercatcher Wine farm is based on (and is a member of) the Nuwejaars Wetland Special Management Area. It’s a conservation agricultural area home to some of the most endangered bird, plant and animal species in the world. That makes the region perfect for bird lovers – whether you’re an experienced bird-watcher, or are just starting to record your sightings for the first time. So if you’re new to bird-watching, or new to the area, here are a couple of tips to record bird species you may not have seen before: REMEMBER TO BRING YOU BINOCULARS. Loads of DON’T ASSUME ANYTHING. You may think the raptor birds sit along the fence posts on the journey to the sitting on the fence is a Common Buzzard. But don’t Black Oystercatcher. But they usually don’t hang discount the possibility that it may be something more around if you stop. So a pair of binoculars will help you exotic and more rare. Some of the bird species spotted on check their colour, shape and size, even when they take or close to the Black Oystercatcher include the Long to the skies. Crested Eagle, Montagu’s Harrier and Blue-cheeked Bee- HAVE YOUR BIRD GUIDE READY. Whether it be Sasol, eater – species not known to frequent the Agulhas Plain.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuweveld North Wind Farm
    Nuweveld North Wind Farm Red Cap Nuweveld North (Pty) Ltd Avifaunal assessment October 2020 REPORT REVIEW & TRACKING Document title Nuweveld North Wind Farm - Avifaunal Impact study (Scoping Phase) Client name Patrick Killick Aurecon Status Final-for client Issue date October 2020 Lead author Jon Smallie – SACNASP 400020/06 WildSkies Ecological Services (Pty) Ltd 36 Utrecht Avenue, East London, 5241 Jon Smallie E: [email protected] C: 082 444 8919 F: 086 615 5654 2 Regulation GNR 326 of 4 December 2014, as amended 7 April 2017, Appendix 6 Section of Report (a) details of the specialist who prepared the report; and the expertise of that specialist to Appendix 5 compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae ; (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be specified by the Appendix 6 competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared; Section 1.1 & 2 .1 an indication of the quality and age of base data used for the specialist report; Section 3 a description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of the proposed development Section 3.8 and levels of acceptable change; (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the relevance of the season to Section 2.5 to 2.7 the outcome of the assessment; (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the Section 2 specialised process inclusive of equipment and modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity
    [Show full text]
  • Download (1319KB)
    International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 Received: 16-01-2021, Accepted: 17-02-2021, Published: 23-03-2021 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 6, Issue 2, 2021, Page No. 116-121 Occurrence and abundance of butterflies during monsoon season at Mysuru City, Karnataka BK Chethan1, KS Raghunandan2* 1 Faculty, Department of Zoology, Maharani’s Science College for Women, JLB Road, Mysuru, Karnataka, India 2 Assistant Professor, Postgraduate Department of Zoology, JSS College of Arts, Commerce and Science, Ooty Road, Mysuru, Karnataka, India *Corresponding Author: KS Raghunandan Abstract The field survey was conducted to study on Butterflies occurrence during Monsoon season at Mysuru, Karnataka. Butterfly species were documented from June to September, 2020 by following Standard Methods. A total of 56 butterfly species belonging to 05 different families were recorded. Further, Family Nymphalidae records highest number of Butterfly species (39.29 %), followed by Pieridae (23.21%), Lycaenidae (21.43%) and Papilionidae (10.71%) families. Least number of Butterfly species contributed by family Hesperiidae (5.36%). These Butterflies were further classified into Common (77%) and Rare (23%) based on Abundance status. Interestingly, Butterfly species viz., Euploea core, Hypolimnas misippus, Cepora nerissa, Castalius rosimon and Pachliopta hector which are listed in Schedule I, II and IV of Indian Wildlife Protection Act (IWPA), 1972 were documented from the study area. Thus, the present study instigates further research on various aspects on Butterfly species during different seasons at Mysuru, Karnataka which is important from the Conservation point of view. Keywords: butterflies, nymphalidae, Mysuru City, Karnataka Introduction butterflies are strictly seasonal and prefers only a particular Butterflies are one of the amazing and magnificent elements set of habitats.
    [Show full text]