$352,095,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2005 a MORGAN STANLEY CITIG

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

$352,095,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2005 a MORGAN STANLEY CITIG NEW ISSUE-BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS, UNINSURED BONDS" - S&P, AA­ Moody's: Aa3 Fitch: AA INSURED BONDS - S&P, AAA Moody's: Aaa Fitch: AAA (See "Ratings" herein.) In the opinion of Orrick, Herrinfiton g' Sutcliffe LLP and Lofton g' Jen.ninfis, Co-Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existinfi laws, refiulations, rulinfis and court decisions and assuminfi, amonfi other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds is excluded from fiross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the InteTnal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds is Mt a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual or corporate alternative minimum taxes, althoufih Co-Bond Counsel observe that such interest is included in adjusted current eaTninfis in calculatinfi corporate alternative minimum taxable income. Co-Bond Counsel express no opinion refiardinfi any other tax conseque.nces related to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds. See "TJJ.X MJJ.TTEES" herein $352,095,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2005 A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown below The San Francisco Bay Jl.rea Rapid Transit District Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Eefundinfi Series 2005 Ji. (the "Series 2005 Ji. Bonds") are beinfi issued to refund certain outstandinfi sales tax revenue bonds previously issued by the San Francisco Bay Jl.rea Rapid Transit District (the "District") See "PL!l.N OF FINJJ.NCE" herein. The Series 2005 Ji. Bonds are delivercib"le in fully re[!istered form and, when issued, will be re[!istered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC") Individual purchases of Series 2005 Ji. Bonds will be made in principal amounts of $5,000 and inteffral multip"les thereof and will be in book-entry form only. Purchasers of Series 2005 Ji. Bonds will not receive bonds representinfi their beneficial ownership in the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds but will receive a credit balance on the books of their respective DTC Participants or DTC Indirect Participants. The Series 2005 Ji. Bonds will not be transfercib"le or exchanfieable except for transfer to another nominee of DTC or as otheTWise descriOed herein Interest on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds, which is pavcib"le on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencinfi January 1, 2006, and principal on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds is payable by U.S. Bank National Jl.ssociation, as trustee, to Cede g' Co., and such interest and principal payments are to be disbursed to the beneficial owners of the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds throufih their respective DTC Participants or DTC Indirect Participants The Series 2005 Ji. Bonds are subject to optional and mandatory redemption prior to maturity as descriOed herein The Series 2005 Ji. Bonds are special obli[!ations of the District, payable from and secured by a p"ledfie of Sales Tax Revenues derived from a transaction and use tax "levied by the District in Jl.lameda and Contra Costa Counties and the City and County of San Francisco, as more fully described herein. The Series 2005 Ji. Bonds are issued on a parity with certain other bonds issued by the District and currently outstandinfi. See "SECURITY FOE THE SERIES 2005 Ji. BONDS" herein Payment of principal of and interest on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds maturinfi on or after July 1, 2008 (the "Insured Series 2005 Ji. Bonds") when due will be insured by a financial fiuaranty insurance policy to be issued by MBIJJ. Insurance Corporation simultaneously with the delivery of the Insured Series 2005 Ji. Bonds See "BOND INSUEJJ.NCE" herein MBIA This cover page contains certain information for reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. M.!lTURITY SCHEDULE $26,?,625,000 SERI.!lL BONDS Maturity Maturity Date Principal Interest Price or Date Principal Interest Price or July I Amonnt Ra<e Yield CUSIPt July I Amonnt Ra<e Yield CUSIPt 2006'' $12,655,000 3.000% 2.680% 797669LUO 2016 $3,670,000 3.875% 3.940% 797669MM7 2007'' ~195,000 3.000 2.860 797669LV8 2016 12,250,000 5.000 39to' 797669MN5 2007'' ,455,000 5.000 2.860 797669LW6 2017 5,200,000 4 000 3 9 0' 797669MPO 2008 :yoso,ooo 3.000 2.980 797669LX,? 2017 lf820,000 5.000 3. 990' 797669MQ8 2008 ,265,000 5.000 2.980 797669LY2 2018 1 ,455,000 5.000 4.040' 797669MR6 2009 9,115,000 4 000 3.160 797669LZ9 2019 9,215,000 5.000 4.080' 797669MS4 2009 5,850,000 5.000 3.160 797669M.!1_3 2020 'i'.635,000 4 250 100 797669MT2 2010 6,840,000 3.250 3.290 797669MB1 2020 ,040,000 5.000 4.120• 797669MU9 2011 8,225,000 5.000 3440 797669MC9 2021 4,650,000 5.000 4.140' 797669MV7 2012 6,595,000 3.500 3.600 797669MD7 2022 4,875,000 5.000 4.160' 797669MW5 2012 2,t15,000 5.000 3.600 797669ME5 2023 5,120,000 5.000 4.190' 797669MX3 2013 2, 45,000 3.625 3.690 797669MF2 2024 18,510,000 5.000 4.210• 797669MY1 2013 9,685,000 5.000 3.690 797669MGO 2025 17,300,000 4 250 4.480 797669NJJ.2 2014 2,175,000 3750 3770 797669MH8 2025 2,130,000 4 375 4.480 797669MZ8 2014 11,270,000 5.000 3770 797669MJ4 2026 20,260,000 5.000 4.250' 797669NBO 2015 4,880,000 4 000 3.860 797669MK1 2030 1,650,000 4 500 4 550 797669NC8 2015 10,250,000 5.000 3.860 797669ML9 $55,685,000 5.00% Term Bonds due July 1, 2030; Yield4.30%\ CUSIPf: 797669ND6 $31,785,000 5.00% Term Bonds due July 1, 2034, Yield4.33%\ CUSIPf: 797669NE4 The Series 2005 JI. Bonds are offered when, as and if issued and received by the UnderwrUers, subject to the approval of validi;ty by Orrick, Herrimjton g' Sutcliffe LLP and Lofton g' Jennin!js, San Francisco, California, Co-Bond Counsel. Certai;n le!jal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriters by Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, California and for the District by its General Counsel, Sherwood G Wakeman, Esq The Series 2005 JI. Bonds are expected to be delivered throu!jh DTC on or about September 7, 2005 MORGAN STANLEY CITIGROUP Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. Goldman, Sachs & Co. Merrill Lynch & Co. Backstrom Mc Carley Berry & Co., LLC Jackson Securities Loop Capital Markets, LLC Siebert Brandford Shank & Co., LLC The date of this Official Statement is Jl.u!just 10, 2005 Priced to the par call date of July 1, 2015 Copyri!jht 2005, Jl.merican Bankers Jl.ssociation CU SIP data provided by Standard g' Poor's CU SIP Service Bureau, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. CU SIP Numbers are provided for convenience of reference only Neither the District nor the Underwriters take any responsibility for the accuracy of such numbers North onco I ~~ -~~i.-'" artin.ez ... ·· · ·· · · An,tioch kspur nco fl ,, Cla . nt Hill DanviUe itAr Station) n Ramon . Ill Ill 1ss1on .. .. 1ss1on To n~ Tracy/ Dublin "' Stockton Livermore Pleasanton Weekdays Only Peak Period 6 am-9aml 4pm-7pm . .. .. .. .•• . ••••. ....................... •••• •••••••••••·······F· . (approx. times) . .. .. .. rie·· m·· ont BART Richmond- . Daly C · FO/Millbrae BART Fremont-Daly City arm r1n• BART Pittsbu · ay Point­ SFOJMillbrae BART DublinlPleasanton­ Daly City San Joaquin (Amtrak) ACE (Alta.mont Commuter Express) an Caltrain BART Pa Jose Regional Rail Transfer Point To Gilroy SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, 23rd Floor Oakland, California 94612 (510) 464-6000 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Joel Keller Carole Ward Allen President Vice President Thomas M. Blalock Gail Murray James Fang Tom Radulovich Bob Franklin Lynette Sweet ZoydLuce OFFICERS Thomas E. Margro - General Manager Scott L. Schroeder - Controller/Treasurer Kenneth A. Duron - District Secretary GENERAL COUNSEL Sherwood G. Wakeman, Esq. TRUSTEE U.S. Bank National Association San Francisco, California CO-BOND COUNSEL Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP San Francisco, California Lofton & Jennings San Francisco, California CO-FINANCIAL ADVISORS Public Financial Management, Inc. San Francisco, California Eagle Asset Management San Francisco, California VERIFICATION AGENT Causey, Demgen & Moore, Inc. Denver, Colorado IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING OF THE SERIES 2005 A BONDS, THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OVER-ALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS THAT STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE SERIES 2005 A BONDS AT A LEVEL ABOVE THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OFFER AND SELL THE SERIES 2005 A BONDS TO CERTAIN DEALERS AND DEALER BANKS AND BANKS ACTING AS AGENT AT PRICES LOWER THAN THE PUBLIC OFFERING PRICES STATED ON THE COVER PAGE HEREOF, AND SAID PUBLIC OFFERING PRICES MAY BE CHANGED FROM TIME TO TIME BY THE UNDERWRITERS. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell the Series 2005 A Bonds in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer in such jurisdiction. No dealer, broker, salesman or other person has been authorized by the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (the "District") or the llllderwriters identified on the cover page of this Official Statement (the "Underwriters") to give any information or to make any representation other than that contained herein and, if given or made, such other information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized.
Recommended publications
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE www.BART.gov #2009-074 Contact: Linton Johnson August 13, 2009 Chief Spokesperson BART Media & Public Affairs 510-464-7139 Desk 510-899-2285 Pager [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BOARD MARKS MAJOR MILESTONE BY ADOPTING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OF BART PD STATE LAWMAKERS URGED TO FINALIZE CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OAKLAND, CA – In a unanimous vote, the BART Board of Directors reached a major milestone today in delivering on its commitment to improve police services and public confidence by approving independent citizen oversight of the BART Police Department. “Today’s Board action is truly historic,” BART Board Member Carole Ward Allen said. Ward Allen chairs the BART Police Department Review Committee, which Board President Thomas Blalock created following the January 1 shooting of Oscar Grant on the platform of Fruitvale Station by a former police officer. “What we approved today has one of the strongest components of citizen oversight in the state of California. The process now moves to the state legislature. We urge our state representatives to take swift action so we can implement citizen oversight this year as we continue to work to make the BART Police Department the best it can be.” “We have a dedicated, professional and highly trained police force at BART and we want to keep it that way,” Director Joel Keller said. Keller is the vice chair of the committee. “Citizen oversight, if done properly, can help us achieve that.” BART NEEDS CHANGE IN STATE LAW TO MOVE FORWARD BART is a special district created by the state legislature and requires an amendment of the BART Act to create citizen oversight as adopted by the Board today.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT
    Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT Estimated Capital Cost (Base Year in Estimated O&M Cost (Base Year in Millions) Millions) Project Description Total Miles Local Federal O&M Cost Over 20 Total Capital Cost Annual O&M Cost Share Share Years Two (2) miles of heavy rail transit (HRT) from HE Holmes station to a I‐20 West Heavy Rail Transit 2 $250.0 $250.0 $500.0 $13.0 $312.0 new station at MLK Jr Dr and I‐285 Seven (7) miles of BRT from the Atlanta Metropolitan State College Northside Drive Bus Rapid Transit (south of I‐20) to a new regional bus system transfer point at I‐75 7 $40.0 N/A $40.0 $7.0 $168.0 north Clifton Light Rail Four (4) miles of grade separated light rail transit (LRT) service from 4 $600.0 $600.0 $1,200.0 $10.0 $240.0 Contingent Multi‐ Transit* Lindbergh station to a new station at Emory Rollins Jurisdicitional Projects I‐20 East Bus Rapid Three (3) miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) service from Five Points to 3 $28.0 $12.0 $40.0 $3.0 $72.0 Transit* Moreland Ave with two (2) new stops and one new station Atlanta BeltLine Twenty‐two (22) miles of bi‐directional at‐grade light rail transit (LRT) 22 $830 $830 $1,660 $44.0 $1,056.0 Central Loop service along the Atlanta BeltLine corridor Over three (3) miles of bi‐directional in‐street running light rail transit Irwin – AUC Line (LRT) service along Fair St/MLK Jr Dr/Luckie St/Auburn 3.4 $153 $153 $306.00 $7.0 $168.0 Ave/Edgewood Ave/Irwin St Over two (2) miles of in‐street bi‐directional running light rail transit Downtown – Capitol
    [Show full text]
  • WMATA State of Good Repair Years of Underfunding and Tremendous
    RECOMMENDATIONS WMATA State of Good Repair Years of underfunding and tremendous regional growth have resulted in underinvestment and significant deterioration of the Washington Metrorail’s core transit infrastructure and assets, creating substantial obstacles to consistently delivering safe, reliable, and resilient service to its customers. In an effort to bring the system up to a state of good repair, WMATA created Momentum, a strategic 10-year plan that has set short-term and long-term actions to accelerate core capital investment in state of good repair and sustain investment into the future. Momentum identifies a $6 billion list of immediate and critical capital investments, called Metro 2025, aimed at (1) maximizing the existing rail system by operating all 8-car trains during rush hour, (2) improving high-volume rail transfer stations and underground pedestrian connections, (3) enhancing bus service, (4) restoring peak service connections, (5) integrating fare technology across the region’s multiple transit operators and upgrading communication systems, (6) expanding the bus fleet and storage and maintenance facilities, and (7) improving the flexibility of the transit infrastructure. With the first capital investment alone, WMATA estimates a capacity increase of 35,000 more passengers per hour during rush hour, which is the equivalent of building 18 new lanes of highway in Washington, DC. The second investment is a “quick win” to relieve crowding in the system’s largest bottlenecks and bring its most valuable core infrastructure up to a state of good repair. MTA Transportation Reinvention Commission Report ~ 31 ~ RECOMMENDATIONS Improving the System: Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP) and Transport for London (TfL) Major cities around the world, notably London and Paris, are investing in their core system by maintaining and renewing their assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Draft Eis
    CHAPTER 12: DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT EIS The Draft EIS was transmitted to the officials, agencies, organizations, and individuals listed in this chapter. The Draft EIS is available for review during normal business hours at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties and at the VTA office at 3331 North First Street, Building B in San Jose. Copies of the document may be obtained by contacting VTA at (408) 321-5789. VTA has notified all property owners/tenants who may be impacted by the Build Alternatives and has advertised the availability of the EIS in local periodicals, including the Fremont Argus, San Jose Mercury News, The Milpitas Post, El Observador, Thoi Boa, and Santa Clara Weekly. See Chapter 11.0: Agency and Community Participation for additional information. 12.1 PUBLIC OFFICIALS Federal Elected Officials The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Barbara Boxer U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate District 8 501 First Street, Suite 7-600 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 San Francisco, CA 94102 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Barbara Lee U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 District 9 San Francisco, CA 94104 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1000-N Oakland, CA 94612 The Honorable George Miller U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Ellen Tauscher District 7 U.S. House of Representatives 1333 Willow Pass Road District 10 Concord, CA 94520 2121 North California Boulevard, Suite 555 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Agencies and Organizations Notified of Draft EIS Availability 12-1 Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor EIS The Honorable Jerry McNerney State Elected Officials U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue 11(3)
    Public JOURNAL OF Transportation Volume 11, No. 3, 2008 ISSN 1077-291X TheJournal of Public Transportation is published quarterly by National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida • College of Engineering 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, Florida 33620-5375 Phone: 813•974•3120 Fax: 813•974•5168 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nctr.usf.edu/jpt/journal.htm © 2008 Center for Urban Transportation Research Volume 11, No. 3, 2008 ISSN 1077-291X CONTENTS Vehicle Trip Reduction Impacts of Transit-Oriented Housing Robert Cervero, G. B. Arrington .......................................................................................................... 1 Estimating Energy Savings from Bus Improvement Options in Urban Corridors Moazzem Hossain, Scott Kennedy ...................................................................................................19 Travel Demand Management: Lessons for Malaysia Jeyapalan Kasipillai, Pikkay Chan ...................................................................................................41 More Passengers and Reduced Costs—The Optimization of the Berlin Public Transport Network Tom Reinhold, A. T. Kearney ...............................................................................................................57 Smart Growth and Transit-Oriented Development at the State Level: Lessons from California, New Jersey, and Western Australia John L. Renne ..............................................................................................................................................77
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Guide Statewide Offices
    Election day: November 2, 2010 1 Index reen voter guide Statewide Offices ............................................. 1, 3, 4, 5 State Assembly, Federal Offices................................... 7 State Propositions ................................................ 1, 5, 6 Judicial Offices .......................................................... 15 Special Districts ................................................... 14, 15 County Offices and Measures ...................................... 6 REEN City Offices and Measures. voter guide Alameda .................................................................... 8 Albany ............................................................... 11, 13 Berkeley ........................................................ 1, 12, 13 Election Day: November 2, 2010 Emeryville ................................................................. 8 A special election publication of the Green Party of Alameda County, Oakland ...................................................... 1, 9, 10, 11 Voter Card ..................................................... Back page an affiliate of the Green Party of California General Election November 2, 2010 Statewide Races 1978? Under Prop 13, a property is not considered to have Proposition 23 - No, No, No! Governor changed ownership unless over 50 percent of it is purchased Guts Greenhouse Gas Laws by a single owner, so if three purchasers buy a property, no The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) Laura Wells change of ownership occurs. Publicly traded companies
    [Show full text]
  • BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O
    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 (510) 464-6000 2008 April 18, 2008 Gail Murray PRESIDENT V1A E-MAIL and Thomas M. Blalock, P.E. VICE PRESIDENT U.S. POSTAL SERVICE Dorothy W. Dugger GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Kevin Kennedy, Chief Program Evaluation Branch DIRECTORS Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board Gail Murray 1ST DISTRICT 1001 I Street Joel Keller Sacramento, CA 95814 2ND DISTRICT Bob Franklin RE: Role of Offsets Under AB 32 3RD DISTRICT Carole Ward Allen 4TH DISTRICT Dear Mr. Kennedy: Zoyd Luce 5TH DISTRICT The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist1ict ("BART") operates a heavy Thomas M. Blalock, P.E. rail public rapid-transit system serving the San Francisco Bay Area. The system 6TH DISTRICT consists of 104 miles of track and 43 stations, and serves 1.3 billion passenger Lynette Sweet miles per year. Because each BART trip is estimated to produce onl y 14% of 7TH DISTRICT the per-mile greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions generated by travel by private JamesFang 8TH DISTRICT auto, BART helps to reduce the Bay Area's net greenhouse gas emissions by an Tom Radulovich estimated 0.4 million metric tons ("MMT") CO2 per year. Thi s reducti on is 9TH DISTRICT equi valent to roughl y one percent of the Bay Area's transpo11ation sector CO2 emissions, and is the same magnitude as many of the Discrete Early Action measures adopted by ARB. BART appreciates the oppo11unity to respond to the GHG emission offsets questions posed by Air Resources Board staff in connectiory with the April 4, 2008 AB 32 Technical Stakeholder Worki ng Group Meeting on offsets.
    [Show full text]
  • 10B-FY2020-Budget-Adoption-FINALIZED.Pdf
    Report by Finance and Capital Committee (B) 03-28-2019 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 202068 Yes No TITLE: Adopt FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Staff will review feedback received from the public and equity analysis on the FY2020 Proposed Budget and request approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report, FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to seek Board acceptance and approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report and Title VI equity analysis, and the FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP. DESCRIPTION: Budget Priorities: Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable The budget is built upon the General Manager/CEO's Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable (KMSRA) strategic plan. Metro is making major progress to achieve the goals of this plan by ramping up to average capital investment of $1.5 billion annually, establishing a dedicated capital trust fund exclusive to capital investment, and limiting jurisdictional annual capital funding growth to three percent. Metro continues to encourage the U.S. Congress to reauthorize the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) beyond FY2020, which provides $150 million in annual federal funds matched by $150 million from the District of Columbia, State of Maryland, and Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to establish a sustainable operating model, Metro is limiting jurisdictional operating subsidy growth to three percent and deploying innovative competitive contracting. The items on the KMSRA agenda that remain to be completed include restructuring retirement benefits and creating a Rainy Day Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • 1990 Ordinances.Pdf
    RR 7.4* FORM 141.4 BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONE:RS CITY OF OAKLAND PORT ORDINANCE No. 3017 Introduced by Seconded by AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORT ORDINANCE NO. 867 CREATING THE POSITION OF PORT TELEPHONE RECEPTIONIST CLERK AND CREATING AN ADDITIONAL POSITION OF COMMERCIAL REPRESENTATIVE IV. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland as follows: Section 1. Section 5.134 is hereby added to Port Ordinance No. 867 to create a new position of Port Telephone Receptionist Clerk, which section shall read as follows: No. of Salary or Positions Title Schedule No. Sec. 5.134 1 Port Telephone Receptionist Clerk 70 Section 2. Section 8.24 of Port Ordinance No. 867 is hereby amended to create an additional position of Commercial Representative IV, which section shall read as follows: No. of Salary or Positions Title Grade No. Sec. 8.24 6 Commercial Representative IV 1 1 In Board of Port Commissioners, Oakland, California, December 4, 1990. Passed to print for one day by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Brady, Lockhart, Ortiz and President Ward Allen - 4. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioners Chang, Sweeney and Wilson -- 3. CHRISTOPHER C. MARSHALL Secretary of the Board Adopted at an adjourned regular meeting held December 18, 1990 By the following Vote: Ayes: Commissioners Chang, Lockhart, Ortiz, Wilson and Vice President Sweeney-5. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioner Brady and President Ward Allen - 2. Secretary. 01■111■11•11■•■•■ Affidavit of Publication Affidavit of Publication of PORT ORDINANCE NO. 3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } ss. County of ALAMEDA N. Kennedy being duly sworn, say: That I am and was during all the time herein mentioned,e citizen of the JtALL 1RI4L United States, over the age of twenty-one years, not a party to or interested in the AN matter or action herein set forth.
    [Show full text]
  • DC State Rail Plan Website
    STATE RAIL PLAN: FINAL REPORT 2017 State Rail Plan Table of Contents Contents Chapter 1 The Role of Rail in District Transportation ............................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Federal Authority For States ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Institutional Governance Structure of The District’s Rail Programs .......................................... 1-2 1.4 Multimodal Transportation System Goals .................................................................................. 1-3 1.5 Rail Transportation’s Role within The District’s Transportation System ................................... 1-5 1.5.1 Role of Freight Rail ................................................................................................................ 1-5 1.5.2 Role of Commuter Rail .......................................................................................................... 1-6 1.5.3 Role of Intercity Rail ............................................................................................................... 1-6 Chapter 2 Approach to Public and Agency Participation ...................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Stakeholder Roundtables ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Station Plan
    Draft Station Plan Comments on this draft plan can be submitted to [email protected]. The public is also invited to attend upcoming open houses to provide input and learn more about the C Line and its station locations. • Tuesday, November 17th o Minneapolis Central Library 300 Nicollet Mall 11:30am – 1pm o Patrick Henry High School 4320 Newton Ave. N. 6pm – 8pm • Wednesday, November 18th o Harrison Education Center 501 Irving Ave. N. 6pm – 8pm • Thursday, November 19th o Lucy Laney Community School 3333 Penn Ave. N. 6pm – 8pm After the open houses, the plan will be revised to incorporate public input and a staff-recommended C Line Station Plan will go before the Metropolitan Council for approval. Metropolitan Council approval will be sought in early 2016. The recommended C Line Station Plan will finalize the number of C Line stations and locations of those stations to allow for the detailed design and engineering phase to proceed. DRAFT C Line Station Plan: Table of Contents Table of Contents I. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Planning Process .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 III. Project Implementation & Timeline ...................................................................................................................... 12 IV. Station
    [Show full text]
  • 02.11.2009 Like BART Turns Over Internal Affairs
    02.11.2009 Like BART turns over internal affairs probe to independent, third-party law firm BART announced today that it has turned over its internal affairs investigation to the Oakland-based law firm of Meyers Nave. Meyers Nave is an independent, third party that will investigate the actions of all the officers present during the events leading up to the shooting death of Oscar Grant on January 1, 2009, on the Fruitvale Station platform. "Meyers Nave has strong ties to this community and extensive experience in conducting internal affairs Third Party Apps investigations," BART Board Member Carole Ward Allen said. Ward Allen chairs the newly formed Board of iPhone and Android and Directors BART Police Department Review Committee. "All of us on the Committee felt it was essential for the Facebook, oh my! BART public to have complete confidence in the findings of this internal investigation – and that the best way to guarantee developers are the best, and that confidence was to bring someone in from the outside with an impeccable record to conduct the investigation it's not because they work for independently." free: look at all the cool apps Video of the press conference where the announcement was made is available on BARTtv. using BART's open format data. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INTERNAL & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS There are two investigations taking place; the internal affairs investigation now being handled by Meyers Nave and the ongoing criminal investigation by the BART Police Department, which includes the investigation into the actions of the six officers who were with now-former officer Johannes Mehserle on the platform at the time of the shooting.
    [Show full text]