DOCSLIB.ORG

DC State Rail Plan Website

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DC State Rail Plan Website STATE RAIL PLAN: FINAL REPORT 2017 State Rail Plan Table of Contents Contents Chapter 1 The Role of Rail in District Transportation ............................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Federal Authority For States ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Institutional Governance Structure of The District’s Rail Programs .......................................... 1-2 1.4 Multimodal Transportation System Goals .................................................................................. 1-3 1.5 Rail Transportation’s Role within The District’s Transportation System ................................... 1-5 1.5.1 Role of Freight Rail ................................................................................................................ 1-5 1.5.2 Role of Commuter Rail .......................................................................................................... 1-6 1.5.3 Role of Intercity Rail ............................................................................................................... 1-6 Chapter 2 Approach to Public and Agency Participation ...................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Stakeholder Roundtables ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Stakeholder Roundtable #1 ................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2 Stakeholder Roundtable #2 ................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Stakeholder Briefings .................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3 Website ....................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 Survey .......................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.5 Public Meetings ........................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.5.1 Public Open House #1 ......................................................................................................... 2-10 2.6 Workshops ................................................................................................................................ 2-10 2.6.1 L'Enfant Station Listening Session ...................................................................................... 2-10 2.6.2 Visioning Workshop ............................................................................................................. 2-10 Chapter 3 The District’s Rail System....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 History of the District’s Rail System ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 19th Century .......................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 McMillan Commission ............................................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.3 Washington as a North-South Railroad Gateway ................................................................. 3-4 3.1.4 Railroad Decline and Crisis .................................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.5 Rebirth of Union Station and Passenger Rail ........................................................................ 3-6 3.1.6 Freight Rail Developments .................................................................................................... 3-8 3.2 The District’s Existing Rail System: Description and Inventory ................................................. 3-9 3.2.1 Existing Freight, Intercity Passenger, and Commuter Rail Service ...................................... 3-9 3.2.2 Profiles of Rail Operators in the District ............................................................................. 3-10 3.2.3 Rail Infrastructure in the District ......................................................................................... 3-25 3.2.4 Usage of the District Rail Network...................................................................................... 3-34 3.2.5 Intercity Passenger Rail Services in the District .................................................................. 3-37 3.2.6 Strategic Rail Corridor Network (STRACNET) .................................................................... 3-42 3.2.7 Multimodal Connections ..................................................................................................... 3-43 District Department of Transportation Page i State Rail Plan Table of Contents 3.2.8 Intercity Passenger Service Performance Evaluation ......................................................... 3-47 3.2.9 Safety and Security Programs ............................................................................................. 3-53 3.2.10 Economic and Environmental Impacts ................................................................................ 3-66 3.3 Review of State Rail Plans from Neighboring States ............................................................... 3-73 3.3.1 Relevant Initiatives from Maryland ...................................................................................... 3-73 3.3.2 Relevant Initiatives from Virginia ......................................................................................... 3-73 3.3.3 Relevant Northeast Corridor Initiatives .............................................................................. 3-74 3.3.4 Relevant Southeast Corridor Initiatives .............................................................................. 3-75 Chapter 4 Passenger Rail Issues, Needs, and Potential Improvements/Investments ........................... 4-1 4.1 Passenger Rail System Trends and Forecasts ............................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Demographic and Economic Growth Factors ....................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Passenger Demand and Growth ........................................................................................... 4-2 4.2 Issues and Opportunities With The District Passenger Rail Network ....................................... 4-6 4.2.1 Yards ...................................................................................................................................... 4-6 4.2.2 Stations .................................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.3 Other Longer-term Passenger Rail Needs ................................................................................. 4-9 4.3.1 NEC FUTURE ......................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.3.2 Northeast Maglev .................................................................................................................. 4-9 4.3.3 Washington, DC-Richmond High Speed Rail ...................................................................... 4-10 4.4 Potential Infill Passenger Rail Stations...................................................................................... 4-10 Chapter 5 Freight Rail Needs and Potential Improvements/ Investments ........................................... 5-1 5.1 Freight Rail System Trends and Forecasts ................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.1 Overall Trends ....................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2 Freight Flow by Commodity ................................................................................................. 5-3 5.1.3 Forecasted Rail Freight Traffic .............................................................................................. 5-3 5.2 Issues and Opportunities With the District Freight Rail Network ............................................. 5-5 5.3 Freight Rail Initiatives .................................................................................................................. 5-5 5.3.1 National Gateway Initiative/Virginia Avenue Tunnel ............................................................ 5-5 5.3.2 Washington, DC Freight Bypass ........................................................................................... 5-6 5.4 Railroad Freight Facilities ........................................................................................................... 5-7 Chapter 6 Rail Service Investment Program ........................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Vision, Goals, and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1.1 Vision ...................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1.2 Goals .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Virginia Railway Express Strategic Plan 2004-2025
    VRE STRATEGIC PLAN Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................V Current State of the Railroad ..............................................................................................................v The Strategic Planning Process..........................................................................................................vi The VRE Ridership Market................................................................................................................vii Strategic Plan Scenarios and Recommendations .............................................................................viii Core Network Needs...........................................................................................................................ix Potential Network Expansion ..............................................................................................................x Phased Service Improvement and Capital Investment Plan ..............................................................xii Financial, Institutional and Organizational Issues ..........................................................................xiii VRE Moving Forward ......................................................................................................................xiv 1. CURRENT STATE OF THE RAILROAD..........................................................................................1 VRE SYSTEM OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT
    Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT Estimated Capital Cost (Base Year in Estimated O&M Cost (Base Year in Millions) Millions) Project Description Total Miles Local Federal O&M Cost Over 20 Total Capital Cost Annual O&M Cost Share Share Years Two (2) miles of heavy rail transit (HRT) from HE Holmes station to a I‐20 West Heavy Rail Transit 2 $250.0 $250.0 $500.0 $13.0 $312.0 new station at MLK Jr Dr and I‐285 Seven (7) miles of BRT from the Atlanta Metropolitan State College Northside Drive Bus Rapid Transit (south of I‐20) to a new regional bus system transfer point at I‐75 7 $40.0 N/A $40.0 $7.0 $168.0 north Clifton Light Rail Four (4) miles of grade separated light rail transit (LRT) service from 4 $600.0 $600.0 $1,200.0 $10.0 $240.0 Contingent Multi‐ Transit* Lindbergh station to a new station at Emory Rollins Jurisdicitional Projects I‐20 East Bus Rapid Three (3) miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) service from Five Points to 3 $28.0 $12.0 $40.0 $3.0 $72.0 Transit* Moreland Ave with two (2) new stops and one new station Atlanta BeltLine Twenty‐two (22) miles of bi‐directional at‐grade light rail transit (LRT) 22 $830 $830 $1,660 $44.0 $1,056.0 Central Loop service along the Atlanta BeltLine corridor Over three (3) miles of bi‐directional in‐street running light rail transit Irwin – AUC Line (LRT) service along Fair St/MLK Jr Dr/Luckie St/Auburn 3.4 $153 $153 $306.00 $7.0 $168.0 Ave/Edgewood Ave/Irwin St Over two (2) miles of in‐street bi‐directional running light rail transit Downtown – Capitol
    [Show full text]
  • Assignment to VPRA of Amtrak & VRE Agreements
    June 28, 2021 Assignment to VPRA of Amtrak & VRE Agreements Six Agreements To Be Assigned Passenger Rail Improvement Funding and Partnership Agreement (March 26, 2021) A M T Master Property Lease (March 26, 2021) R A Operating Agreement (April 14, 2021) K Passenger Rail Improvements and Funding Agreement (March 26, 2021) V Passenger Station Ground Lease Agreement (March 26, 2021) R E Passenger Rail Operations and Access Agreement (March 26, 2021) 2 Scope and Effect of Proposed Amtrak and VRE Assignments • 3 Amtrak Agreements and 3 VRE Agreements recommended to be assigned from DRPT to VPRA • Follows the 7 previously assigned CSX agreements. • VPRA will be bound to DRPT’s duties. 3 AMTRAK AGREEMENTS 4 Bottom Line: Doubles State-Supported Amtrak Service in Virginia All current and future trains travel from Virginia to the Northeast Corridor Amtrak Funding Agreement Amtrak invests $944M for Amtrak Dispatch Rights Amtrak Maintenance Rights Phases 1&2 • Exclusive right to operate six • North of Alexandria after • Right of first refusal to provide new train starts; seven if Phase 2; maintenance of Virginia track Norfolk Southern agrees to after Phase 2 completion. another train to Roanoke • South of Alexandria after maximum feasible separation • Exclusive intercity operator between passenger and between Washington and freight tracks Richmond for 30 years after final new train start in Phase 2 • 24-month trial period to optimize service • Virginia has rights to terminate dispatching rights based on performance (10-year grace period) 6 Amtrak Funding Agreement Additional Amtrak Rights Key VPRA Responsibilities • Right of first refusal to purchase 1) DC to • Provide balance of Phase 1 and 2 funding Richmond or 2) S-Line from Petersburg to NC if VPRA sells.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Plan
    Appendix B: City of Fredericksburg Comprehensive Plan Transportation Analysis July 2007 prepared for City of Fredericksburg by in association with City of Fredericksburg Transportation Analysis Comprehensive Plan Appendix B: Contents 1 Transportation Overview.......................................................................................................B-1 2 A Multi-Modal System ............................................................................................................B-1 2.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Ways ........................................................................................B-3 2.2 Roadways.........................................................................................................................B-7 2.3 Bus Transit....................................................................................................................B-12 2.4 Commuting...................................................................................................................B-12 2.5 Parking...........................................................................................................................B-15 2.6 Air, Rail and Bus Service.............................................................................................B-16 2.7 Movement of Goods and Services............................................................................B-17 3 Best Practices..........................................................................................................................B-17 3.1 Pedestrian
    [Show full text]
  • WMATA State of Good Repair Years of Underfunding and Tremendous
    RECOMMENDATIONS WMATA State of Good Repair Years of underfunding and tremendous regional growth have resulted in underinvestment and significant deterioration of the Washington Metrorail’s core transit infrastructure and assets, creating substantial obstacles to consistently delivering safe, reliable, and resilient service to its customers. In an effort to bring the system up to a state of good repair, WMATA created Momentum, a strategic 10-year plan that has set short-term and long-term actions to accelerate core capital investment in state of good repair and sustain investment into the future. Momentum identifies a $6 billion list of immediate and critical capital investments, called Metro 2025, aimed at (1) maximizing the existing rail system by operating all 8-car trains during rush hour, (2) improving high-volume rail transfer stations and underground pedestrian connections, (3) enhancing bus service, (4) restoring peak service connections, (5) integrating fare technology across the region’s multiple transit operators and upgrading communication systems, (6) expanding the bus fleet and storage and maintenance facilities, and (7) improving the flexibility of the transit infrastructure. With the first capital investment alone, WMATA estimates a capacity increase of 35,000 more passengers per hour during rush hour, which is the equivalent of building 18 new lanes of highway in Washington, DC. The second investment is a “quick win” to relieve crowding in the system’s largest bottlenecks and bring its most valuable core infrastructure up to a state of good repair. MTA Transportation Reinvention Commission Report ~ 31 ~ RECOMMENDATIONS Improving the System: Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP) and Transport for London (TfL) Major cities around the world, notably London and Paris, are investing in their core system by maintaining and renewing their assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Transportation Status Report August 2017
    Attachment 1 Fairfax County Transportation Status Report Prepared by: Department of Transportation Capital Projects and Traffic Engineering Division August 2017 T!LE OF ONTENTS Department of Transportation Summary of Activities and Highlights March 2017 through August 2017 Projects ompleted and Under onstruction _____________________________________ 1 icycle and Pedestrian Programs _______________________________________________ 2 apital Projects and Traffic Engineering Division __________________________________ 4 apital Projects Section ____________________________________________________ 4 Traffic Engineering Section __________________________________________________ 5 oordination and Funding Division _____________________________________________ 5 Marketing, ommunications, and Fairfax ounty ommuter Services ________________ 12 Special Projects Division (Dulles Rail Phases 1 & 2) _______________________________ 14 Transit Services Division _____________________________________________________ 15 Transportation Design Division _______________________________________________ 19 Site !nalysis and Transportation Planning Division _______________________________ 20 Site !nalysis Section ______________________________________________________ 20 Transportation Planning Section ____________________________________________ 22 ounty Transportation Priorities Plan __________________________________________ 25 Transportation Priorities Plan: FY2018 – FY2020 Projects ________________________ 25 Legend L-1 Project Status Report – New Format P-i
    [Show full text]
  • He L'enfant Plan of 1791
    >ince its inception as a formal park, the National The Residence Act of 1790 authorized the president 11all has evolved and expanded along with the to choose the location for the new city. President 1atlon that created it. The story of the .Mall Is the . George Washington chose as the city's site the land .tory of the building of a new Federal City to serve in Maryland and Virginia where the Eastern Branch !S capital of the United States. From marshes and (Anacostia River), Rock Creek, and Tiber Creek fed neadows to one of the most famous and historic into the Potomac River. The Act also designated 3ndscapes in the world, the National Mall serves as three commissioners to have immediate authority his nation's front lawn. over purchasing and accepting • ...such quantity of land for use of the United States.• Most of the land -radition has it that the plain at the foot of present· acquired by the commissioners, Including the Carroll iay Capitol Hill, drained by the Tiber Creek, was the and Burnes properties, became this nation's first 1unting and fishing grounds of Native Americans. federal public parks. President Washington hired the Vith seventeenth century British colonization, most mifitary engineer Major Pierre Charles L'Enfant to if this land eventually came into the ownership of design the Federal City. It was L'Enfant's intention he Carroll and Burnes families. • ...to turn a savage wilderness into a Garden of Eden.• he L'Enfant Plan of 1791 .'Enfant envisioned a city of parks. The Mall, or Personality clashes with tha three commissioners ·c;;rand Avenue," was to be the central landscaoe of led to L'Enfant's dismissal in 1792.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021
    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021 April 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission (the Commission) to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Chair 4 Executive Summary 6 Overview 8 Implementing the Plan: Goals 10 Spotlight on State-of-Good-Repair Backlog 12 Implementing the Plan: Challenges 14 Implementing the Plan: Opportunities 16 Programs and Projects 18 Washington, DC to Philadelphia, PA 20 Philadelphia, PA to New Rochelle, NY 22 New Rochelle, NY to New Haven, CT 24 New Haven, CT to Boston, MA 26 Connecting Corridors 28 Project List and Other Appendices 30 Letter from the Chair The Northeast Corridor (NEC) is a vital asset for businesses, workers, residents, and visitors in the Northeast and beyond. Its eight commuter rail operators deliver hundreds of thousands of workers to some of the most productive economic centers in the country each day.
    [Show full text]
  • VRE Crystal City Station Mr
    Thursday, June 13, 2019 7:00 p.m. 3040 Williams Drive, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22031 AGENDA I. Call to Order Chairman Nohe II. Roll Call Ms. Thomas-Jones, Clerk III. Minutes of the April 11, 2019 Meeting Recommended action: Approval [with abstentions from members who were not present] Presentation IV. VRE Crystal City Station Mr. Doug Allen, VRE, CEO Consent Agenda V. Approval of Standard Project Agreement for Arlington County—Regional Funding 2018-003-1 (Crystal City Metrorail Station East Entrance and Intermodal Connections) VI. Approval of Standard Project Agreement for Arlington County—Regional Funding 2018-004-1 (Pentagon City Multimodal Connections and Transitway Extension) VII. Approval of Standard Project Agreement for Prince William County— Regional Funding 2018-032-2 (Route 28 Corridor Roadway Improvements - East of Route 234 – Environmental Impact Study) VIII. Approval of Standard Project Agreement for the City of Alexandria--- Regional Funding 2018-041-1 (Alexandria ITS Projects) IX. Approval of Standard Project Agreement for the City of Alexandria--- Regional Funding 2018-043-1 (DASH Transit Service Enhancements and Expansion) X. Approval of Standard Project Agreement for the City of Alexandria--- Regional Funding 2018-045-1 (Alexandria Duke Street Transitway) 1 XI. Approval of Standard Project Agreement for the City of Falls Church— Regional Funding 2018-051-1 (West Falls Church and Joint Campus Revitalization District Multimodal Transportation Project) Action XII. Approval of the Call for Regional Transportation Projects for FY2024-2025 Mr. Jasper, Principal Transportation Planning and Programming Recommended action: Approval of Call for Projects XIII. Approval of Participation in the Long Term Care Program Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Transportation Options for People with Disabilities and Senior Citizens
    Accessible Transportation Options for People with Disabilities and Senior Citizens In the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area JANUARY 2017 Transfer Station Station Features Red Line • Glenmont / Shady Grove Bus to Airport System Orange Line • New Carrollton / Vienna Parking Station Legend Blue Line • Franconia-Springfield / Largo Town Center in Service Map Hospital Under Construction Green Line • Branch Ave / Greenbelt Airport Full-Time Service wmata.com Yellow Line • Huntington / Fort Totten Customer Information Service: 202-637-7000 Connecting Rail Systems Rush-Only Service: Monday-Friday Silver Line • Wiehle-Reston East / Largo Town Center TTY Phone: 202-962-2033 6:30am - 9:00am 3:30pm - 6:00pm Metro Transit Police: 202-962-2121 Glenmont Wheaton Montgomery Co Prince George’s Co Shady Grove Forest Glen Rockville Silver Spring Twinbrook B30 to Greenbelt BWI White Flint Montgomery Co District of Columbia College Park-U of Md Grosvenor - Strathmore Georgia Ave-Petworth Takoma Prince George’s Plaza Medical Center West Hyattsville Bethesda Fort Totten Friendship Heights Tenleytown-AU Prince George’s Co Van Ness-UDC District of Columbia Cleveland Park Columbia Heights Woodley Park Zoo/Adams Morgan U St Brookland-CUA African-Amer Civil Dupont Circle War Mem’l/Cardozo Farragut North Shaw-Howard U Rhode Island Ave Brentwood Wiehle-Reston East Spring Hill McPherson Mt Vernon Sq NoMa-Gallaudet U New Carrollton Sq 7th St-Convention Center Greensboro Fairfax Co Landover Arlington Co Tysons Corner Gallery Place Union Station Chinatown Cheverly 5A to
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbohood Conservation Strategies
    Subregion 4 Transit-Oriented Development Implementation Project The Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Neighborhood Conservation Report TOD Transit Oriented Development Neighbohood ConservationTOD Strategies The Maryland-naTional CapiTal park and planning CoMMission September 2011 prinCe george’s CounTy planning deparTMenT www.pgplanning.org TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW 3 INTRODuCTION 4 mapS Project Area Figure 1: Neighborhood Conservation Focus Area 4 Purpose of Neighborhood Conservation Element Figure 2: Seat Pleasant Neighborhood (2009 Aerial) 4 Neighborhood History Figure 3: Carmody Hills-Pepper Mill Village Neighborhood (2009 Aerial) 5 Figure 4: Capitol Heights Neighborhood (2009 Aerial) 5 DEmOgRaphICS 6 Figure 5: Walker Mill-Ritchie Neighborhood (2009 Aerial) 5 Population Figure 6: Existing Land Use 9 Education, Employment, and Income Figure 7: Existing Zoning 10 Housing Figure 8: Vacant Properties 11 LaDSE N u aND ZONINg 8 Figure 9: Publicly Owned Properties 12 14 Land Use Figure 10: Development Activity 16 Zoning Figure 11: Year of Construction 17 Vacant Land Figure 12: M-NCPPC Park and Recreation Facilities 18 Property Ownership Figure 13: Green Infrastructure Figure 14: Foreclosures in Zip Code 20743 20 develom p ENT aCTIVITy 13 Figure 15: Preliminary Conservation Areas 22 Development Activity Summary Figure 16: Sustainable Communities 24 Approved Residential Developments Approved Mixed-Use Projects NI R E ghbO hOOD CONDITIONS 15 Housing Sidewalks Street Lighting Roadways Parks and Recreation and Green Infrastructure Foreclosure Trends SbE u R gION 4 maSTER pLaN NEIghbORhOOD CONSERVaTION STRaTEgIES 21 Foreclosure Prevention Homeownership and Home Improvement Business and Neighborhood Development NEI R ghbO hOOD CONSERVaTION aREaS 22 STaTE pOLICIES aND LEgISLaTIVE pROgRamS 23 NEIghbORhOOD CONSERVaTION pROgRamS 23 State County OVERVIEW century as an important roadway for trade between rural • Existing and potential opportunities for creating safe The Subregion 4 Central Avenue Metro Blue Line Corridor Maryland and the District of Columbia.
    [Show full text]