02.11.2009 Like BART Turns Over Internal Affairs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

02.11.2009 Like BART Turns Over Internal Affairs 02.11.2009 Like BART turns over internal affairs probe to independent, third-party law firm BART announced today that it has turned over its internal affairs investigation to the Oakland-based law firm of Meyers Nave. Meyers Nave is an independent, third party that will investigate the actions of all the officers present during the events leading up to the shooting death of Oscar Grant on January 1, 2009, on the Fruitvale Station platform. "Meyers Nave has strong ties to this community and extensive experience in conducting internal affairs Third Party Apps investigations," BART Board Member Carole Ward Allen said. Ward Allen chairs the newly formed Board of iPhone and Android and Directors BART Police Department Review Committee. "All of us on the Committee felt it was essential for the Facebook, oh my! BART public to have complete confidence in the findings of this internal investigation – and that the best way to guarantee developers are the best, and that confidence was to bring someone in from the outside with an impeccable record to conduct the investigation it's not because they work for independently." free: look at all the cool apps Video of the press conference where the announcement was made is available on BARTtv. using BART's open format data. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INTERNAL & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS There are two investigations taking place; the internal affairs investigation now being handled by Meyers Nave and the ongoing criminal investigation by the BART Police Department, which includes the investigation into the actions of the six officers who were with now-former officer Johannes Mehserle on the platform at the time of the shooting. "The criminal investigation is examining any and all use of force by the officers that night," BART Board Member Joel Keller said. Keller is Vice Chair of the BART Police Department Review Committee. "The results of the criminal investigation will be delivered to the District Attorney’s office, which will determine if any of the actions of the six other BART police officers rise to the level of prosecutable conduct. The internal affairs investigation will primarily focus on the time those officers were on the platform, however, it will also look into the events on the train that preceded the officers’ arrival as well investigate the tactics and actions of the command staff who directed the officers." Mobile solutions If anyone has any information about the case, please contact Meyers Nave at 510-808-2055 or email We've got more mobile options [email protected] or contact the BART Police Department at 510-464-7040. than you can shake a stick at: real time arrivals, trip planners, BOARD COMMITTEE’S NEXT STEPS fares and plain old schedules Now that the Board Committee has turned over the internal affairs investigation, it will also engage experts in law everywhere you go on your enforcement to conduct a top-to-bottom review of all BART Police policies and procedures. Keller said he mobile device. anticipates that an expert or experts will be identified in the next couple of weeks. The Committee also plans to host workshops and discussion forums as a way to involve the public while the Committee members: Review the different approaches to citizen oversight of police. Hear from members of established citizen oversight review boards. Work to identify the best oversight model for BART police. Conduct an in-depth review of the practices and policies of the BART Police Department. BOARD COMMITTEE ENLISTS EXPERTISE OF REGINALD LYLES Additionally, the Board Committee announced today that it has retained the services of Reginald Lyles to support the Committee in its work. Mr. Lyles is a long-time member of the Oakland faith community. He spent over 20 years with the Berkeley Police Department, and he retired from law enforcement as a Novato police captain in 2003. Mr. Lyles will support the work of the Committee as it seeks significant community input and involvement in the establishment of citizen oversight of BART police and in the comprehensive review of the BART Police Department. ABOUT MEYERS NAVE Meyers Nave is known throughout the state for its expertise in a broad range of police work and public law. The Oakland based law firm has a solid reputation built on the highest ethical standards. The firm has a 20 year history of producing independent, objective reports that have led to the discipline and termination of officers in other jurisdictions as well as changes in the policies and procedures of other law enforcement agencies. The Meyers Nave team that will conduct the internal investigation includes: Jayne Williams Jayne Williams is the managing principal of Meyers Nave. She is a member of the firm's public law department and currently serves as the city attorney for the City of San Leandro. Jayne has extensive experience in strategic planning, managing and coordinating litigators and transactional attorneys in complex civil litigation and innovative public project initiatives. She is an acknowledged expert in all aspects of representation of elected and appointed public officials and public agencies. Kim Colwell Kim Colwell is the chair of Meyers Nave’s Tort/Civil Rights Litigation Practice Group and Litigation Manager for the entire Firm. Kim has handled hundreds of police conduct cases have involved police civil rights litigation, from minor traffic stops through hostage situations, false arrest, taser cases and shootings. David Cunningham David Cunningham, a principal in Meyers Nave’s LA office, has extensive experience in police work, having presided over 250 use of force cases while serving on the Board of Police Commissioners, the civilian oversight body over the Los Angeles Police Department. David is also currently an appointed member of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Equity Oversight Panel whose function is to make findings and recommend discipline following investigations of harassment and discrimination within the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Art Hartinger Art Hartinger is a principal at Meyers Nave and chairperson of the Labor and Employment Department. Art regularly handles administrative matters, including employee termination proceedings, grievances and wage and hour matters, where he advises and supervises internal investigations. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING HIRING OF OUTSIDE FIRM TO CONDUCT INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATION WHY HIRE AN INDEPENDENT FIRM TO DO AN INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATION? We are taking this unusual step of handing over our internal affairs investigation to an independent third party to assure ourselves and the public of the absolute objectivity of this investigation. It is imperative that BART determine whether the actions of the officers on the platform violated any policy or procedures of the BART Police Department or state or federal law. While we have every confidence in the capabilities of our BART Police Department’s Internal Affairs office to investigate its own officers, we believe that handing off this investigation to an independent third party will assure the public that we take this investigation extremely seriously and the findings and recommendations that Meyers Nave presents will be credible. We believe we need to rebuild trust with the public and one way to do that is to ask a third party to have a reputable independent firm conduct the investigation. WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BART’S INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATION AND ITS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION? There are two investigations taking place. The internal affairs investigation, which BART has retained Meyers Nave to conduct, will investigate whether the actions of any officer on the platform violated BART Police policies and procedures. The results of an internal affairs investigation can lead to changes in policies and procedures, retraining or disciplinary action, up to and including termination. A separate criminal investigation was conducted to determine if any laws were violated. District Attorney Tom Orloff used the investigation conducted by the BART Police Department, along with the parallel investigation by his office (with the assistance of the Oakland Police Department), to criminally charge former officer Mehserle. BART’s role in the criminal investigation is ongoing and will include the review of the level of force used by the officers on the platform. Now that the DA has released BART police investigators to resume interviews with witnesses and police officers and has provided critical video evidence, BART Police hope to complete its investigation and turn over the results to the District Attorney’s Office in the next two weeks. The District Attorney’s Office will decide if any other officer’s action warrants criminal prosecution. BART Police investigators anticipate presenting the investigation to the District Attorney in the coming weeks. The District Attorney will determine if criminal charges are warranted. WHAT WILL MEYERS NAVE’S MISSION BE? The firm will conduct an independent, objective and unbiased internal affairs investigation of all seven BART police officers who were present during in the New Year’s Day shooting. While the firm will primarily focus on the actions of those officers on the platform, it will also look into the events on the train that preceded the officers’ arrival as well as investigate the tactics and actions of the command staff who directed the officers. The firm’s assignment is to determine whether the officers and command staff acted within the policies, practices and procedures of the BART Police Department. The firm will also look at whether the policies, practices and procedures used on New Year’s Day conform to both state and federal laws as well as align with the best practices of the policing profession. Here are some examples of what the firm will investigate: Whether or not the level of force used was appropriate; Whether or not the officers acted professionally and their contact with the public was appropriate; Whether they had reasonable cause to detain; Whether or not the officers acted reasonably.
Recommended publications
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE www.BART.gov #2009-074 Contact: Linton Johnson August 13, 2009 Chief Spokesperson BART Media & Public Affairs 510-464-7139 Desk 510-899-2285 Pager [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BOARD MARKS MAJOR MILESTONE BY ADOPTING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OF BART PD STATE LAWMAKERS URGED TO FINALIZE CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OAKLAND, CA – In a unanimous vote, the BART Board of Directors reached a major milestone today in delivering on its commitment to improve police services and public confidence by approving independent citizen oversight of the BART Police Department. “Today’s Board action is truly historic,” BART Board Member Carole Ward Allen said. Ward Allen chairs the BART Police Department Review Committee, which Board President Thomas Blalock created following the January 1 shooting of Oscar Grant on the platform of Fruitvale Station by a former police officer. “What we approved today has one of the strongest components of citizen oversight in the state of California. The process now moves to the state legislature. We urge our state representatives to take swift action so we can implement citizen oversight this year as we continue to work to make the BART Police Department the best it can be.” “We have a dedicated, professional and highly trained police force at BART and we want to keep it that way,” Director Joel Keller said. Keller is the vice chair of the committee. “Citizen oversight, if done properly, can help us achieve that.” BART NEEDS CHANGE IN STATE LAW TO MOVE FORWARD BART is a special district created by the state legislature and requires an amendment of the BART Act to create citizen oversight as adopted by the Board today.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Draft Eis
    CHAPTER 12: DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT EIS The Draft EIS was transmitted to the officials, agencies, organizations, and individuals listed in this chapter. The Draft EIS is available for review during normal business hours at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties and at the VTA office at 3331 North First Street, Building B in San Jose. Copies of the document may be obtained by contacting VTA at (408) 321-5789. VTA has notified all property owners/tenants who may be impacted by the Build Alternatives and has advertised the availability of the EIS in local periodicals, including the Fremont Argus, San Jose Mercury News, The Milpitas Post, El Observador, Thoi Boa, and Santa Clara Weekly. See Chapter 11.0: Agency and Community Participation for additional information. 12.1 PUBLIC OFFICIALS Federal Elected Officials The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Barbara Boxer U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate District 8 501 First Street, Suite 7-600 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 San Francisco, CA 94102 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Barbara Lee U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 District 9 San Francisco, CA 94104 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1000-N Oakland, CA 94612 The Honorable George Miller U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Ellen Tauscher District 7 U.S. House of Representatives 1333 Willow Pass Road District 10 Concord, CA 94520 2121 North California Boulevard, Suite 555 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Agencies and Organizations Notified of Draft EIS Availability 12-1 Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor EIS The Honorable Jerry McNerney State Elected Officials U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Guide Statewide Offices
    Election day: November 2, 2010 1 Index reen voter guide Statewide Offices ............................................. 1, 3, 4, 5 State Assembly, Federal Offices................................... 7 State Propositions ................................................ 1, 5, 6 Judicial Offices .......................................................... 15 Special Districts ................................................... 14, 15 County Offices and Measures ...................................... 6 REEN City Offices and Measures. voter guide Alameda .................................................................... 8 Albany ............................................................... 11, 13 Berkeley ........................................................ 1, 12, 13 Election Day: November 2, 2010 Emeryville ................................................................. 8 A special election publication of the Green Party of Alameda County, Oakland ...................................................... 1, 9, 10, 11 Voter Card ..................................................... Back page an affiliate of the Green Party of California General Election November 2, 2010 Statewide Races 1978? Under Prop 13, a property is not considered to have Proposition 23 - No, No, No! Governor changed ownership unless over 50 percent of it is purchased Guts Greenhouse Gas Laws by a single owner, so if three purchasers buy a property, no The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) Laura Wells change of ownership occurs. Publicly traded companies
    [Show full text]
  • BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O
    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 (510) 464-6000 2008 April 18, 2008 Gail Murray PRESIDENT V1A E-MAIL and Thomas M. Blalock, P.E. VICE PRESIDENT U.S. POSTAL SERVICE Dorothy W. Dugger GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Kevin Kennedy, Chief Program Evaluation Branch DIRECTORS Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board Gail Murray 1ST DISTRICT 1001 I Street Joel Keller Sacramento, CA 95814 2ND DISTRICT Bob Franklin RE: Role of Offsets Under AB 32 3RD DISTRICT Carole Ward Allen 4TH DISTRICT Dear Mr. Kennedy: Zoyd Luce 5TH DISTRICT The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist1ict ("BART") operates a heavy Thomas M. Blalock, P.E. rail public rapid-transit system serving the San Francisco Bay Area. The system 6TH DISTRICT consists of 104 miles of track and 43 stations, and serves 1.3 billion passenger Lynette Sweet miles per year. Because each BART trip is estimated to produce onl y 14% of 7TH DISTRICT the per-mile greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions generated by travel by private JamesFang 8TH DISTRICT auto, BART helps to reduce the Bay Area's net greenhouse gas emissions by an Tom Radulovich estimated 0.4 million metric tons ("MMT") CO2 per year. Thi s reducti on is 9TH DISTRICT equi valent to roughl y one percent of the Bay Area's transpo11ation sector CO2 emissions, and is the same magnitude as many of the Discrete Early Action measures adopted by ARB. BART appreciates the oppo11unity to respond to the GHG emission offsets questions posed by Air Resources Board staff in connectiory with the April 4, 2008 AB 32 Technical Stakeholder Worki ng Group Meeting on offsets.
    [Show full text]
  • $352,095,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2005 a MORGAN STANLEY CITIG
    NEW ISSUE-BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS, UNINSURED BONDS" - S&P, AA­ Moody's: Aa3 Fitch: AA INSURED BONDS - S&P, AAA Moody's: Aaa Fitch: AAA (See "Ratings" herein.) In the opinion of Orrick, Herrinfiton g' Sutcliffe LLP and Lofton g' Jen.ninfis, Co-Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existinfi laws, refiulations, rulinfis and court decisions and assuminfi, amonfi other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds is excluded from fiross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the InteTnal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds is Mt a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual or corporate alternative minimum taxes, althoufih Co-Bond Counsel observe that such interest is included in adjusted current eaTninfis in calculatinfi corporate alternative minimum taxable income. Co-Bond Counsel express no opinion refiardinfi any other tax conseque.nces related to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds. See "TJJ.X MJJ.TTEES" herein $352,095,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2005 A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown below The San Francisco Bay Jl.rea Rapid Transit District Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Eefundinfi Series 2005 Ji. (the "Series 2005 Ji. Bonds") are beinfi issued to refund certain outstandinfi sales tax revenue bonds previously issued by the San Francisco Bay Jl.rea Rapid Transit District (the "District") See "PL!l.N OF FINJJ.NCE" herein.
    [Show full text]
  • 1990 Ordinances.Pdf
    RR 7.4* FORM 141.4 BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONE:RS CITY OF OAKLAND PORT ORDINANCE No. 3017 Introduced by Seconded by AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORT ORDINANCE NO. 867 CREATING THE POSITION OF PORT TELEPHONE RECEPTIONIST CLERK AND CREATING AN ADDITIONAL POSITION OF COMMERCIAL REPRESENTATIVE IV. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland as follows: Section 1. Section 5.134 is hereby added to Port Ordinance No. 867 to create a new position of Port Telephone Receptionist Clerk, which section shall read as follows: No. of Salary or Positions Title Schedule No. Sec. 5.134 1 Port Telephone Receptionist Clerk 70 Section 2. Section 8.24 of Port Ordinance No. 867 is hereby amended to create an additional position of Commercial Representative IV, which section shall read as follows: No. of Salary or Positions Title Grade No. Sec. 8.24 6 Commercial Representative IV 1 1 In Board of Port Commissioners, Oakland, California, December 4, 1990. Passed to print for one day by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Brady, Lockhart, Ortiz and President Ward Allen - 4. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioners Chang, Sweeney and Wilson -- 3. CHRISTOPHER C. MARSHALL Secretary of the Board Adopted at an adjourned regular meeting held December 18, 1990 By the following Vote: Ayes: Commissioners Chang, Lockhart, Ortiz, Wilson and Vice President Sweeney-5. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioner Brady and President Ward Allen - 2. Secretary. 01■111■11•11■•■•■ Affidavit of Publication Affidavit of Publication of PORT ORDINANCE NO. 3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } ss. County of ALAMEDA N. Kennedy being duly sworn, say: That I am and was during all the time herein mentioned,e citizen of the JtALL 1RI4L United States, over the age of twenty-one years, not a party to or interested in the AN matter or action herein set forth.
    [Show full text]
  • Agencies and Organizations
    Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor Final EIR CHAPTER 10.0: AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS This chapter presents a list of the agencies and organizations, and individuals who have been notified of the availability of the Draft EIS/EIR. Hard copies and electronic files (compact disks) of the draft document have been made available upon request. Copies of the Draft EIS/EIR may also be obtained online by visiting www.vtabart-vta.org. In addition, the Draft EIS/EIR has been made available for review at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties (see end of Section 10.1). VTA has also notified all property owners/tenants who may potentially be impacted by the SVRTC alternatives. 10.1 AGENCIES ELECTED OFFICIALS The Honorable Barbara Boxer The Honorable Bruce McPherson U.S. Senate California State Senate 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 6544 25 San Juan Grade Road #150 Sacramento, CA 95814 Salinas, CA 93906 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Bryon Sher U.S. Senate California State Senate 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 100 Paseo de San Antonio, Suite 206 San Francisco, CA 94104 San Jose, CA 95113 The Honorable Anna Eshoo The Honorable Liz Figueroa U.S. House of Representatives California State Senate 698 Emerson Street 43271 Mission Boulevard Palo Alto, CA 94301 Fremont, CA 94539 The Honorable Ellen Tauscher The Honorable John Vasconcellos U.S. House of Representatives California State Senate 1801 North California Boulevard, Suite 103 100 Paseo de San Antonio, Suite 209 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 San Jose, CA 95113 The Honorable Mike Honda The Honorable Rebecca Cohn U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Subway Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/ Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTM E NT 1650 Mission S1. Contract No: CS-138 - Central Su ~~y Suite 400 Routing Date :z - {I - D 7J San Francisco, File No.: f .. 70 - 0 ( . a-O CA 94103-2479 Doc No.: 02..$?W Initials: 4Mr 1/< DATE: July 11, 2008 MTA Project No. M544 PBIWong Project No. 13217 Reception: 415.558.6378 TO: Interested Parties Fax: FROM: Joan A. Kugler, Senior Environmental Planner 415.558.6409 RE: CASE NO."'96.281E: CENTRALSlJBWAY PROjECT (PHASE 2 Planning OF THE THIRD STREET LIGHT RAIL PROJECT) COMMENTS Information: 415.558.6377 AND RESPONSES_ ." :~:' . Attached please find a copy of the Comments and Responses document on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) for the above-referenced project, for your review. This document along with the DSEIR is scheduled to be before the Planning Commission for Final SEIR certi£icatioll on July 24, 2008. The Planning Commission meeting begins at 1:30 pm in Rm. 400 of-Clt)Vi-Ikfl,' iDi: . Carlton Goodlett Place. Please call 558-6422 on Monday July 21, or thereafter for a recorded message giving a more precise time that this matter will be heard. Please note that the public review period closed on December 10, 2007. The Commission does not conduct a hearing to receive comments on the Comments and Responses document, and no such hearing is required by the California Environmental Quality Act. You may, however, always write to the Commission members or to the President of the Commission at 1650 Mission Street and express your opinion about the Comments and Responses document, or the Commission's decision to certify the completion of the Final EIR for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared Testimony of Carole Ward Allen San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District AB 1586 (Swanson)
    Prepared Testimony of Carole Ward Allen San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District AB 1586 (Swanson) Senate Public Safety Committee Mark Leno, Chairman Rm. 4203 State Capitol June 15, 2010 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, I am Carole Ward Allen, and I am one of nine elected Directors of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART). I represent parts of Oakland and Alameda County and I serve as Chair of BART’s Police Department Review Committee. So, it should come as no surprise that I am here today to urge your support for AB 1586 – legislation that will allow us to expeditiously move forward to authorize our BART Board to implement important citizen oversight of the BART Police Department. I don’t need to reiterate the urgent need for this bill to pass, and for BART to act as soon as we can. We are often reminded that BART owes its community, and the riders we serve, a transparent system of police oversight. And that is what AB 1586 would allow through BART’s plan : (1) to appoint an independent police auditor to conduct important review of specific BART police actions; and (2) to appoint an eleven member citizen review board to assist the auditor in oversight of the BART Police Department and to recommend appropriate disciplinary action -- should it be necessary. Mr. Chairman, after months of deliberation over the past year and a half among BART Board Members and a specific Subcommittee that I established to draft a citizen oversight model – a subcommittee that included members of the community – the BART Board of Directors unanimously approved a strong proposal last August.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2004 Acknowledgements
    DECEMBER 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by Caltrans through a CONSULTANT TEAM: Community Based Transportation Planning Grant. Daniel Iacofano, MIG, Inc. Rosemary Dudley, MIG, Inc. Paul Tuttle, MIG, Inc. POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Lou Hexter, MIG, Inc. Nancy Nadel, Oakland City Council Member Danny Wan, Oakland City Council Member Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Lynette Sweet, BART Board Member Gregory Saurs, Fehr & Peers Carole Ward-Allen, BART Board Member Robert Rees, Fehr & Peers Eddie Barrios, Fehr & Peers PROJECT TEAM: Natalie Fay, City of Oakland Thomas Matoff, LTK Engineering Services Pamela Kershaw, Port of Oakland John Schumann, LTK Engineering Services Tina Spencer, AC Transit Andrew Thomas, City of Alameda Carolyn Trunnell, Caltrans John Nemeth, BART Val Menotti, BART Marian Lee-Skowronek, BART Jim Gravesande, BART Ric Rattray, BART Sam Lau, BART TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 : INTRODUCTION . .5 Project Background . .6 BART’s Priorities and Project Goals . .6 The Planning Process . .7 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS . .11 Jack London District . .12 Travel Markets . .15 Existing Transit Service . .15 3: ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED . .17 Infill BART Station . .18 Group Rapid Transit (GRT) . .20 Underground BART Shuttle . .22 Streetcar . .24 Distinctive Bus or Shuttle . .31 4: REFINEMENT OF STREETCAR ALTERNATIVE . .33 Alignment Options . .34 Alignment Conclusions . .39 Streetscape Compatibility . .41 Traffic Impacts . .45 5: STREETCAR FUNDING CONCEPTS . .49 Capital Funding . .50 Operations Funding . .51 6: CONCLUSIONS . .53 Lessons from Other Cities . .54 Next Steps . .55 JACK LONDON BART FEASIBILITY STUDY | 3 “...the connection between downtown Oakland and the Jack London Square District is a necessary component to create the energy that both destinations need to thrive.” 1: INTRODUCTION 5 Project Background 6 BART’s Priorities and Project Goals 6 The Planning Process 7 1: Introduction INTRODUCTION Jack London Square has always been a hub of activity, first as an active seaport and more recently as an entertainment district for Bay Area resi- dents and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • BICYCLE ACCESS and PARKING PLAN – VOLUME 1 Page I TABLE of CONTENTS
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS BOARD OF President — Joel Keller DIRECTORS, 2002 Vice-President — Peter W. Snyder District 1 — Dan Richard District 2 — Joel Keller District 3 — Roy Nakadegawa District 4 — Carole Ward Allen District 5 — Peter W. Snyder District 6 — Thomas M. Blalock District 7 — Willie B. Kennedy District 8 — James Fang District 9 — Tom Radulovich EXECUTIVE STAFF Thomas E. Margro, General Manager Dorothy W. Dugger, Deputy General Manager Scott Schroeder, Controller-Treasurer Sherwood G. Wakeman, General Council Kenneth A. Duron, District Secretary Theresa E. Murphy, AGM — Administration Katherine Strehl, Executive Manager, External Affairs Gary Gee, Chief of Police Paul Oversier, AGM — Operations Gary LaBonte, Executive Manager, Transit System Development James Van Epps, Executive Manager, West Bay Extension Ann Branston, Executive Manager, Planning and Budget John Mack, Executive Manager, Transit System Compliance Eugene Skoropowski, Executive Manager, Capitol Corridor PROJECT TEAM BART Staff Harley Goldstrom, Department Manager, Customer Access Laura Timothy, Senior Planner & BART Project Manager, Bicycle Program, Customer Access Consultants Rochelle Wheeler, Transportation Planner & Project Manager Wilbur Smith Associates Carol Levine, Project Manager/Transportation Planner Michelle DeRobertis, Transportation Engineer Acknowledgements BART Bicycle Advisory Task Force BART Planning Department Staff, Office of Planning and Budget BART Operations Staff BART Marketing and Research Department Staff TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P
    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P. 0. Box 12688, Oakland, CA 94604-2688 AGENDAS FOR BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS January 25,2007 9:00 a.m. A regular meeting of the Board of Directors and regular meetings of the Standing Committees will be held on Thursday, January 25, 2007, commencing at 9:00 a.m. All meetings will be held in the BART Board Room, Kaiser Center 2oth Street Mall - Third Floor, 344 - 20'" Street, Oakland, California. Members of the public may address the Board of Directors and Standing Committees regarding any matter on these agendas. Please complete a "Request to Address the Board" form (available at the entrance to the Board Room) and hand it to the Secretary before the item is considered by the Board. If you wish to discuss a matter that is not on the agenda during a regular meeting, you may do so under General Discussion and Public Comment. Any action requiring more than a majority vote for passage will be so noted. Items placed under "consent calendar" and "consent calendar addenda" are considered routine and will be received, enacted, approved, or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from a Director or from a member of the audience. Please refrain from wearing scented products (perfume, cologne, after-shave, etc.) to these meetings, as there may be people in attendance susceptible to environmental illnesses. BART provides serviceiaccommodations upon request to persons with disabilities who wish to address BART Board matters. A request must be made within one and five days in advance of BoardICommittee meetings, depending on the service requested.
    [Show full text]