DOCSLIB.ORG

AC TRANSIT DISTRICT GM Memo No. 05-060 Board of Directors Executive Summary Meeting Date: March 2, 2005 Committees: Planning C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AC TRANSIT DISTRICT GM Memo No. 05-060 Board of Directors Executive Summary Meeting Date: March 2, 2005 Committees: Planning C INFORMATION ITEM AC TRANSIT DISTRICT GM Memo No. 05-060 Board of Directors Executive Summary Meeting Date: March 2, 2005 Committees: Planning Committee Finance Committee External Affairs Committee Operations Committee Board of Directors Financing Corporation SUBJECT: Consider Update on Jack London Square/BART In-fill Station Feasibility Study RECOMMENDED ACTION: Information Only Briefing Item Recommended Motion Fiscal Impact: None Background/Discussion: In 2001, the City of Oakland requested that BART study an in-fill station in the vicinity of Jack London Square on the existing BART train line. BART conducted an Opportunity Scan to examine future land use and transportation opportunities, identify stakeholders, develop project goals and develop a scope of work for further study. After the initial assessment, stakeholders comprised of local business owners, nonprofit agencies, and residents supported BART staff’s effort to seek funding to study the feasibility of an in-fill station in greater detail. In 2003, the City of Oakland and BART obtained funding from the Caltrans Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant Program to conduct the study. The project stakeholders established the following project goals to assist them in the alternatives comparison: BOARD ACTION: Approved as Recommended [x] Other [ ] Approved with Modification(s) [ ] MOTION: BISCHOFBERGER/PEEPLES to receive report as presented (7-0-0-0). Ayes: Directors Bischofberger, Peeples, Jaquez, Kaplan, Hayashi, Vice President Harper, President Wallace - 7 Noes: None - 0 Abstain: None - 0 Absent: None - 0 The above order was passed on March 16, 2005. Rose Martinez, District Secretary By GM Memo No. 05-060 Subject: Jack London Square BART In-fill station Date: March 2, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Examine the feasibility of a BART station in the JLS vicinity to improve regional transit access and intermodal connections Generate new transit ridership on a cost-effective basis, encourage off-peak ridership, and support entertainment uses Enhance the regional image and identity of the entire Jack London District Support mixed-use, higher density development and a pedestrian-friendly environment As evidenced by the established goals, the stakeholders were seeking solutions to economic development issues as much as they were seeking transportation solutions. While BART began the study in 2003 to determine the feasibility of constructing an additional BART station near Jack London Square, ultimately a variety of transit alternatives were considered. These alternatives were then compared to one another based on technical analyses, public input, ridership forecasts, engineering analyses, and construction and operating costs. Four stakeholder meetings were held during the study process, as well as a number of Project Team meetings. AC Transit staff attended the public meetings and was a member of the BART Project Team. Three conceptual alternatives were presented during the first stakeholder meetings: 1) BART In-fill station 2) Underground BART Shuttle 3) Electric Streetcar During the study process, BART investigated the in-fill station alternative at the Jack London location, and found that it could not fit into the existing track geometry without considerable and costly modifications. Consequently, it was not reviewed further. The two other transit alternatives, the underground shuttle and the streetcar, were both carried through further study, which included conceptual alignments, operational and maintenance plans, ridership estimates, and rough capital and operating costs. As the result of further review by the stakeholder policy group, the underground BART shuttle was determined to have long-term possibilities if it were to connect to Alameda, but was not preferred due to its high cost. However, the policy stakeholders also felt that an underground BART connection accessing Alameda was something that should be considered in upcoming studies directed by the city of Alameda as part of the base reuse plan. As a result of the technical analyses and stakeholder input, the streetcar alternative was then further refined as the preferred alternative. A number of alignments were developed along with cost estimates to provide the basis for the final recommendations. GM Memo No. 05-060 Subject: Jack London Square BART In-fill station Date: March 2, 2005 Page 3 of 3 The study concluded by acknowledging that the streetcar is the favored transit mode for the long-term, partly due to its perceived ability to stimulate development and add interest to downtown. A rubber-tire bus or shuttle would be a viable alternative; however, this alternative was less attractive to the stakeholders. The study also identified the following “Next Steps” to keep interest on the streetcar alternative and highlight the issue of access to Jack London Square: City of Alameda, BART, and City of Oakland to consider underground BART shuttle concept as part of Alameda multimodal study City of Oakland to work with the private sector to implement a limited shuttle bus service to the Jack London District Streetcar proponents to consider the creation of Oakland Streetcar nonprofit organization as a focal point to advocate and promote streetcar concept Potential non-profit to work with public agencies to identify funding opportunities Potential nonprofit to seek funding for detailed streetcar feasibility study prior to environmental analysis AC Transit staff has been in contact with staff from both the City of Oakland and BART regarding this project to determine any future steps they may be contemplating. At this time, BART is not considering altering its own expansion plan to include any of the alternatives presented in the study—including the streetcar scenarios. If the future Alameda study proposes a BART alternative that appears feasible, it will be considered at that time. City of Oakland staff has been meeting with the original stakeholders in the area to determine their inclination to form the non-profit group recommended in the study, and to gauge initial support to fund some sort of shuttle service between Jack London Square and 12th Street BART. District staff will be kept informed of any recommendations from these meetings, and will be apprised of the progress of the project. Staff will embrace every opportunity to highlight AC Transit as a potential provider of service between the City Center BART station and Jack London Square. Attachments: Attachment A: Jack London BART feasibility study part 1 Attachment B: Jack London BART feasibility study part 2 Approved by: Rick Fernandez, General Manager Nancy Skowbo, Deputy General Manager Service Development Prepared by: Tina Spencer, Manager of Long Range Planning Date Prepared: Feb. 15, 2005 DECEMBER 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by Caltrans through a CONSULTANT TEAM: Community Based Transportation Planning Grant. Daniel Iacofano, MIG, Inc. Rosemary Dudley, MIG, Inc. Paul Tuttle, MIG, Inc. POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Lou Hexter, MIG, Inc. Nancy Nadel, Oakland City Council Member Danny Wan, Oakland City Council Member Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Lynette Sweet, BART Board Member Gregory Saurs, Fehr & Peers Carole Ward-Allen, BART Board Member Robert Rees, Fehr & Peers Eddie Barrios, Fehr & Peers PROJECT TEAM: Natalie Fay, City of Oakland Thomas Matoff, LTK Engineering Services Pamela Kershaw, Port of Oakland John Schumann, LTK Engineering Services Tina Spencer, AC Transit Andrew Thomas, City of Alameda Carolyn Trunnell, Caltrans John Nemeth, BART Val Menotti, BART Marian Lee-Skowronek, BART Jim Gravesande, BART Ric Rattray, BART Sam Lau, BART TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 : INTRODUCTION . .5 Project Background . .6 BART’s Priorities and Project Goals . .6 The Planning Process . .7 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS . .11 Jack London District . .12 Travel Markets . .15 Existing Transit Service . .15 3: ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED . .17 Infill BART Station . .18 Group Rapid Transit (GRT) . .20 Underground BART Shuttle . .22 Streetcar . .24 Distinctive Bus or Shuttle . .31 4: REFINEMENT OF STREETCAR ALTERNATIVE . .33 Alignment Options . .34 Alignment Conclusions . .39 Streetscape Compatibility . .41 Traffic Impacts . .45 5: STREETCAR FUNDING CONCEPTS . .49 Capital Funding . .50 Operations Funding . .51 6: CONCLUSIONS . .53 Lessons from Other Cities . .54 Next Steps . .55 JACK LONDON BART FEASIBILITY STUDY | 3 “...the connection between downtown Oakland and the Jack London Square District is a necessary component to create the energy that both destinations need to thrive.” 1: INTRODUCTION 5 Project Background 6 BART’s Priorities and Project Goals 6 The Planning Process 7 1: Introduction INTRODUCTION Jack London Square has always been a hub of activity, first as an active seaport and more recently as an entertainment district for Bay Area resi- dents and visitors. Located ten blocks south of the heart of downtown Oakland, Jack London Square (JLS) offers a glimpse into the history of Oakland’s industrial seaport, which has been adapted to provide visitors a unique experience that capitalizes on the port’s identity. The area features a cluster of entertainment venues, including restaurants, bars, performance spaces, and a movie theater. While these activities raise Jack London Square’s profile as a regional destination, the area is separated from downtown by the I-880 freeway and is just far enough away from BART that it requires additional effort to reach, lim- iting its visitors. Given the perception of inaccessibility, stakeholders in the Jack London District, including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE www.BART.gov #2009-074 Contact: Linton Johnson August 13, 2009 Chief Spokesperson BART Media & Public Affairs 510-464-7139 Desk 510-899-2285 Pager [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BOARD MARKS MAJOR MILESTONE BY ADOPTING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OF BART PD STATE LAWMAKERS URGED TO FINALIZE CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OAKLAND, CA – In a unanimous vote, the BART Board of Directors reached a major milestone today in delivering on its commitment to improve police services and public confidence by approving independent citizen oversight of the BART Police Department. “Today’s Board action is truly historic,” BART Board Member Carole Ward Allen said. Ward Allen chairs the BART Police Department Review Committee, which Board President Thomas Blalock created following the January 1 shooting of Oscar Grant on the platform of Fruitvale Station by a former police officer. “What we approved today has one of the strongest components of citizen oversight in the state of California. The process now moves to the state legislature. We urge our state representatives to take swift action so we can implement citizen oversight this year as we continue to work to make the BART Police Department the best it can be.” “We have a dedicated, professional and highly trained police force at BART and we want to keep it that way,” Director Joel Keller said. Keller is the vice chair of the committee. “Citizen oversight, if done properly, can help us achieve that.” BART NEEDS CHANGE IN STATE LAW TO MOVE FORWARD BART is a special district created by the state legislature and requires an amendment of the BART Act to create citizen oversight as adopted by the Board today.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Draft Eis
    CHAPTER 12: DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT EIS The Draft EIS was transmitted to the officials, agencies, organizations, and individuals listed in this chapter. The Draft EIS is available for review during normal business hours at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties and at the VTA office at 3331 North First Street, Building B in San Jose. Copies of the document may be obtained by contacting VTA at (408) 321-5789. VTA has notified all property owners/tenants who may be impacted by the Build Alternatives and has advertised the availability of the EIS in local periodicals, including the Fremont Argus, San Jose Mercury News, The Milpitas Post, El Observador, Thoi Boa, and Santa Clara Weekly. See Chapter 11.0: Agency and Community Participation for additional information. 12.1 PUBLIC OFFICIALS Federal Elected Officials The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Barbara Boxer U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate District 8 501 First Street, Suite 7-600 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 San Francisco, CA 94102 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Barbara Lee U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 District 9 San Francisco, CA 94104 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1000-N Oakland, CA 94612 The Honorable George Miller U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Ellen Tauscher District 7 U.S. House of Representatives 1333 Willow Pass Road District 10 Concord, CA 94520 2121 North California Boulevard, Suite 555 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Agencies and Organizations Notified of Draft EIS Availability 12-1 Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor EIS The Honorable Jerry McNerney State Elected Officials U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Guide Statewide Offices
    Election day: November 2, 2010 1 Index reen voter guide Statewide Offices ............................................. 1, 3, 4, 5 State Assembly, Federal Offices................................... 7 State Propositions ................................................ 1, 5, 6 Judicial Offices .......................................................... 15 Special Districts ................................................... 14, 15 County Offices and Measures ...................................... 6 REEN City Offices and Measures. voter guide Alameda .................................................................... 8 Albany ............................................................... 11, 13 Berkeley ........................................................ 1, 12, 13 Election Day: November 2, 2010 Emeryville ................................................................. 8 A special election publication of the Green Party of Alameda County, Oakland ...................................................... 1, 9, 10, 11 Voter Card ..................................................... Back page an affiliate of the Green Party of California General Election November 2, 2010 Statewide Races 1978? Under Prop 13, a property is not considered to have Proposition 23 - No, No, No! Governor changed ownership unless over 50 percent of it is purchased Guts Greenhouse Gas Laws by a single owner, so if three purchasers buy a property, no The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) Laura Wells change of ownership occurs. Publicly traded companies
    [Show full text]
  • BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O
    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 300 Lakeside Drive, P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 (510) 464-6000 2008 April 18, 2008 Gail Murray PRESIDENT V1A E-MAIL and Thomas M. Blalock, P.E. VICE PRESIDENT U.S. POSTAL SERVICE Dorothy W. Dugger GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Kevin Kennedy, Chief Program Evaluation Branch DIRECTORS Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board Gail Murray 1ST DISTRICT 1001 I Street Joel Keller Sacramento, CA 95814 2ND DISTRICT Bob Franklin RE: Role of Offsets Under AB 32 3RD DISTRICT Carole Ward Allen 4TH DISTRICT Dear Mr. Kennedy: Zoyd Luce 5TH DISTRICT The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist1ict ("BART") operates a heavy Thomas M. Blalock, P.E. rail public rapid-transit system serving the San Francisco Bay Area. The system 6TH DISTRICT consists of 104 miles of track and 43 stations, and serves 1.3 billion passenger Lynette Sweet miles per year. Because each BART trip is estimated to produce onl y 14% of 7TH DISTRICT the per-mile greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions generated by travel by private JamesFang 8TH DISTRICT auto, BART helps to reduce the Bay Area's net greenhouse gas emissions by an Tom Radulovich estimated 0.4 million metric tons ("MMT") CO2 per year. Thi s reducti on is 9TH DISTRICT equi valent to roughl y one percent of the Bay Area's transpo11ation sector CO2 emissions, and is the same magnitude as many of the Discrete Early Action measures adopted by ARB. BART appreciates the oppo11unity to respond to the GHG emission offsets questions posed by Air Resources Board staff in connectiory with the April 4, 2008 AB 32 Technical Stakeholder Worki ng Group Meeting on offsets.
    [Show full text]
  • $352,095,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2005 a MORGAN STANLEY CITIG
    NEW ISSUE-BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS, UNINSURED BONDS" - S&P, AA­ Moody's: Aa3 Fitch: AA INSURED BONDS - S&P, AAA Moody's: Aaa Fitch: AAA (See "Ratings" herein.) In the opinion of Orrick, Herrinfiton g' Sutcliffe LLP and Lofton g' Jen.ninfis, Co-Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existinfi laws, refiulations, rulinfis and court decisions and assuminfi, amonfi other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds is excluded from fiross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the InteTnal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds is Mt a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual or corporate alternative minimum taxes, althoufih Co-Bond Counsel observe that such interest is included in adjusted current eaTninfis in calculatinfi corporate alternative minimum taxable income. Co-Bond Counsel express no opinion refiardinfi any other tax conseque.nces related to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Series 2005 Ji. Bonds. See "TJJ.X MJJ.TTEES" herein $352,095,000 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2005 A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown below The San Francisco Bay Jl.rea Rapid Transit District Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Eefundinfi Series 2005 Ji. (the "Series 2005 Ji. Bonds") are beinfi issued to refund certain outstandinfi sales tax revenue bonds previously issued by the San Francisco Bay Jl.rea Rapid Transit District (the "District") See "PL!l.N OF FINJJ.NCE" herein.
    [Show full text]
  • 1990 Ordinances.Pdf
    RR 7.4* FORM 141.4 BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONE:RS CITY OF OAKLAND PORT ORDINANCE No. 3017 Introduced by Seconded by AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORT ORDINANCE NO. 867 CREATING THE POSITION OF PORT TELEPHONE RECEPTIONIST CLERK AND CREATING AN ADDITIONAL POSITION OF COMMERCIAL REPRESENTATIVE IV. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland as follows: Section 1. Section 5.134 is hereby added to Port Ordinance No. 867 to create a new position of Port Telephone Receptionist Clerk, which section shall read as follows: No. of Salary or Positions Title Schedule No. Sec. 5.134 1 Port Telephone Receptionist Clerk 70 Section 2. Section 8.24 of Port Ordinance No. 867 is hereby amended to create an additional position of Commercial Representative IV, which section shall read as follows: No. of Salary or Positions Title Grade No. Sec. 8.24 6 Commercial Representative IV 1 1 In Board of Port Commissioners, Oakland, California, December 4, 1990. Passed to print for one day by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Brady, Lockhart, Ortiz and President Ward Allen - 4. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioners Chang, Sweeney and Wilson -- 3. CHRISTOPHER C. MARSHALL Secretary of the Board Adopted at an adjourned regular meeting held December 18, 1990 By the following Vote: Ayes: Commissioners Chang, Lockhart, Ortiz, Wilson and Vice President Sweeney-5. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioner Brady and President Ward Allen - 2. Secretary. 01■111■11•11■•■•■ Affidavit of Publication Affidavit of Publication of PORT ORDINANCE NO. 3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } ss. County of ALAMEDA N. Kennedy being duly sworn, say: That I am and was during all the time herein mentioned,e citizen of the JtALL 1RI4L United States, over the age of twenty-one years, not a party to or interested in the AN matter or action herein set forth.
    [Show full text]
  • 02.11.2009 Like BART Turns Over Internal Affairs
    02.11.2009 Like BART turns over internal affairs probe to independent, third-party law firm BART announced today that it has turned over its internal affairs investigation to the Oakland-based law firm of Meyers Nave. Meyers Nave is an independent, third party that will investigate the actions of all the officers present during the events leading up to the shooting death of Oscar Grant on January 1, 2009, on the Fruitvale Station platform. "Meyers Nave has strong ties to this community and extensive experience in conducting internal affairs Third Party Apps investigations," BART Board Member Carole Ward Allen said. Ward Allen chairs the newly formed Board of iPhone and Android and Directors BART Police Department Review Committee. "All of us on the Committee felt it was essential for the Facebook, oh my! BART public to have complete confidence in the findings of this internal investigation – and that the best way to guarantee developers are the best, and that confidence was to bring someone in from the outside with an impeccable record to conduct the investigation it's not because they work for independently." free: look at all the cool apps Video of the press conference where the announcement was made is available on BARTtv. using BART's open format data. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INTERNAL & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS There are two investigations taking place; the internal affairs investigation now being handled by Meyers Nave and the ongoing criminal investigation by the BART Police Department, which includes the investigation into the actions of the six officers who were with now-former officer Johannes Mehserle on the platform at the time of the shooting.
    [Show full text]
  • Agencies and Organizations
    Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor Final EIR CHAPTER 10.0: AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS This chapter presents a list of the agencies and organizations, and individuals who have been notified of the availability of the Draft EIS/EIR. Hard copies and electronic files (compact disks) of the draft document have been made available upon request. Copies of the Draft EIS/EIR may also be obtained online by visiting www.vtabart-vta.org. In addition, the Draft EIS/EIR has been made available for review at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties (see end of Section 10.1). VTA has also notified all property owners/tenants who may potentially be impacted by the SVRTC alternatives. 10.1 AGENCIES ELECTED OFFICIALS The Honorable Barbara Boxer The Honorable Bruce McPherson U.S. Senate California State Senate 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 6544 25 San Juan Grade Road #150 Sacramento, CA 95814 Salinas, CA 93906 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Bryon Sher U.S. Senate California State Senate 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 100 Paseo de San Antonio, Suite 206 San Francisco, CA 94104 San Jose, CA 95113 The Honorable Anna Eshoo The Honorable Liz Figueroa U.S. House of Representatives California State Senate 698 Emerson Street 43271 Mission Boulevard Palo Alto, CA 94301 Fremont, CA 94539 The Honorable Ellen Tauscher The Honorable John Vasconcellos U.S. House of Representatives California State Senate 1801 North California Boulevard, Suite 103 100 Paseo de San Antonio, Suite 209 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 San Jose, CA 95113 The Honorable Mike Honda The Honorable Rebecca Cohn U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Subway Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/ Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTM E NT 1650 Mission S1. Contract No: CS-138 - Central Su ~~y Suite 400 Routing Date :z - {I - D 7J San Francisco, File No.: f .. 70 - 0 ( . a-O CA 94103-2479 Doc No.: 02..$?W Initials: 4Mr 1/< DATE: July 11, 2008 MTA Project No. M544 PBIWong Project No. 13217 Reception: 415.558.6378 TO: Interested Parties Fax: FROM: Joan A. Kugler, Senior Environmental Planner 415.558.6409 RE: CASE NO."'96.281E: CENTRALSlJBWAY PROjECT (PHASE 2 Planning OF THE THIRD STREET LIGHT RAIL PROJECT) COMMENTS Information: 415.558.6377 AND RESPONSES_ ." :~:' . Attached please find a copy of the Comments and Responses document on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) for the above-referenced project, for your review. This document along with the DSEIR is scheduled to be before the Planning Commission for Final SEIR certi£icatioll on July 24, 2008. The Planning Commission meeting begins at 1:30 pm in Rm. 400 of-Clt)Vi-Ikfl,' iDi: . Carlton Goodlett Place. Please call 558-6422 on Monday July 21, or thereafter for a recorded message giving a more precise time that this matter will be heard. Please note that the public review period closed on December 10, 2007. The Commission does not conduct a hearing to receive comments on the Comments and Responses document, and no such hearing is required by the California Environmental Quality Act. You may, however, always write to the Commission members or to the President of the Commission at 1650 Mission Street and express your opinion about the Comments and Responses document, or the Commission's decision to certify the completion of the Final EIR for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared Testimony of Carole Ward Allen San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District AB 1586 (Swanson)
    Prepared Testimony of Carole Ward Allen San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District AB 1586 (Swanson) Senate Public Safety Committee Mark Leno, Chairman Rm. 4203 State Capitol June 15, 2010 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, I am Carole Ward Allen, and I am one of nine elected Directors of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART). I represent parts of Oakland and Alameda County and I serve as Chair of BART’s Police Department Review Committee. So, it should come as no surprise that I am here today to urge your support for AB 1586 – legislation that will allow us to expeditiously move forward to authorize our BART Board to implement important citizen oversight of the BART Police Department. I don’t need to reiterate the urgent need for this bill to pass, and for BART to act as soon as we can. We are often reminded that BART owes its community, and the riders we serve, a transparent system of police oversight. And that is what AB 1586 would allow through BART’s plan : (1) to appoint an independent police auditor to conduct important review of specific BART police actions; and (2) to appoint an eleven member citizen review board to assist the auditor in oversight of the BART Police Department and to recommend appropriate disciplinary action -- should it be necessary. Mr. Chairman, after months of deliberation over the past year and a half among BART Board Members and a specific Subcommittee that I established to draft a citizen oversight model – a subcommittee that included members of the community – the BART Board of Directors unanimously approved a strong proposal last August.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2004 Acknowledgements
    DECEMBER 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by Caltrans through a CONSULTANT TEAM: Community Based Transportation Planning Grant. Daniel Iacofano, MIG, Inc. Rosemary Dudley, MIG, Inc. Paul Tuttle, MIG, Inc. POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Lou Hexter, MIG, Inc. Nancy Nadel, Oakland City Council Member Danny Wan, Oakland City Council Member Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Lynette Sweet, BART Board Member Gregory Saurs, Fehr & Peers Carole Ward-Allen, BART Board Member Robert Rees, Fehr & Peers Eddie Barrios, Fehr & Peers PROJECT TEAM: Natalie Fay, City of Oakland Thomas Matoff, LTK Engineering Services Pamela Kershaw, Port of Oakland John Schumann, LTK Engineering Services Tina Spencer, AC Transit Andrew Thomas, City of Alameda Carolyn Trunnell, Caltrans John Nemeth, BART Val Menotti, BART Marian Lee-Skowronek, BART Jim Gravesande, BART Ric Rattray, BART Sam Lau, BART TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 : INTRODUCTION . .5 Project Background . .6 BART’s Priorities and Project Goals . .6 The Planning Process . .7 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS . .11 Jack London District . .12 Travel Markets . .15 Existing Transit Service . .15 3: ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED . .17 Infill BART Station . .18 Group Rapid Transit (GRT) . .20 Underground BART Shuttle . .22 Streetcar . .24 Distinctive Bus or Shuttle . .31 4: REFINEMENT OF STREETCAR ALTERNATIVE . .33 Alignment Options . .34 Alignment Conclusions . .39 Streetscape Compatibility . .41 Traffic Impacts . .45 5: STREETCAR FUNDING CONCEPTS . .49 Capital Funding . .50 Operations Funding . .51 6: CONCLUSIONS . .53 Lessons from Other Cities . .54 Next Steps . .55 JACK LONDON BART FEASIBILITY STUDY | 3 “...the connection between downtown Oakland and the Jack London Square District is a necessary component to create the energy that both destinations need to thrive.” 1: INTRODUCTION 5 Project Background 6 BART’s Priorities and Project Goals 6 The Planning Process 7 1: Introduction INTRODUCTION Jack London Square has always been a hub of activity, first as an active seaport and more recently as an entertainment district for Bay Area resi- dents and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • BICYCLE ACCESS and PARKING PLAN – VOLUME 1 Page I TABLE of CONTENTS
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS BOARD OF President — Joel Keller DIRECTORS, 2002 Vice-President — Peter W. Snyder District 1 — Dan Richard District 2 — Joel Keller District 3 — Roy Nakadegawa District 4 — Carole Ward Allen District 5 — Peter W. Snyder District 6 — Thomas M. Blalock District 7 — Willie B. Kennedy District 8 — James Fang District 9 — Tom Radulovich EXECUTIVE STAFF Thomas E. Margro, General Manager Dorothy W. Dugger, Deputy General Manager Scott Schroeder, Controller-Treasurer Sherwood G. Wakeman, General Council Kenneth A. Duron, District Secretary Theresa E. Murphy, AGM — Administration Katherine Strehl, Executive Manager, External Affairs Gary Gee, Chief of Police Paul Oversier, AGM — Operations Gary LaBonte, Executive Manager, Transit System Development James Van Epps, Executive Manager, West Bay Extension Ann Branston, Executive Manager, Planning and Budget John Mack, Executive Manager, Transit System Compliance Eugene Skoropowski, Executive Manager, Capitol Corridor PROJECT TEAM BART Staff Harley Goldstrom, Department Manager, Customer Access Laura Timothy, Senior Planner & BART Project Manager, Bicycle Program, Customer Access Consultants Rochelle Wheeler, Transportation Planner & Project Manager Wilbur Smith Associates Carol Levine, Project Manager/Transportation Planner Michelle DeRobertis, Transportation Engineer Acknowledgements BART Bicycle Advisory Task Force BART Planning Department Staff, Office of Planning and Budget BART Operations Staff BART Marketing and Research Department Staff TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Introduction
    [Show full text]