Lithuanian Literature in 1918–1940: the Dynamics of Influences and Originality
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bibliografija 2003
LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS INSTITUTAS LIETUVOS ISTORIJOS BIBLIOGRAFIJA 2003 Sudarė IRENA TUMELYTĖ Vilnius, 2016 UDK 016:947.45 Li227 Bibliography of the History of Lithuania 2003 Compiler Irena Tumelytė Redakcinė kolegija: Zigmantas Kiaupa (pirmininkas) Rimantas Miknys Vladas Sirutavičius Juozas Tumelis ISSN 1392-981X © Lietuvos istorijos institutas, 2016 © Irena Tumelytė, 2016 TURINYS PRATARMĖ ............................................................................................................................... 7 1. BENDRASIS SKYRIUS ........................................................................................................ 9 1.1. Bibliografijos ....................................................................................................................... 9 a) bibliografijos ..................................................................................................................... 9 b) bibliografijos istorija ...................................................................................................... 10 c) personalinės bibliografijos .............................................................................................. 10 1.2. Enciklopedijos, žodynai ir žinynai .................................................................................... 11 1.3. Istorijos periodika ir tęstiniai leidiniai .............................................................................. 11 1.4. Istorijos mokslo institucijos, darbo organizavimas .......................................................... -
Lithuanian Voices
CHAPTER FIVE Lithuanian Voices 1. Lithuanian Letters in the U.S. The list of American works featuring Lithuanians is short; it apparently consists of three novels. However, for such a small nation, not a “global player” in Franzen’s words, three novels authored by Americans can be seen as sufficient and even impressive. After all, three American authors found Lithuanians interesting enough to make them the main characters of their works. Two of those works, Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle and Jonathan Franzen’s The Corrections, became bestsellers and popularized the name of Lithuania in the U.S. and the world. The third work, Margaret Seebach’s That Man Donaleitis, although overlooked by critics and readers, nevertheless exists as a rare token of admiration for an obscure and oppressed people of the Russian empire. Many other small nations never made it to the pages of American texts. The best they could do was to present themselves to Americans in their own ethnic writing in English. However, the mere existence of such ethnic texts did not guarantee their success with the American audience. Ethnic groups from Eastern Europe for a long time presented little interest to Americans. As noted by Thomas Ferraro, autobiographical and biographical narratives of “immigrants from certain little-known places of Eastern Europe . did not attract much attention” (383). He mentions texts by a Czech, a Croatian, a Slovakian and a Pole written between 1904 and 1941, and explains the lack of attention to them from American public: “the groups they depict remained amorphous in the national imagination and did not seem to pose too much of a cultural threat” (383). -
Lithuanian Writers and the Establishment During Late Socialism: the Writers Union As a Place for Conformism Or Escape Vilius Ivanauskas
LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 15 2010 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 51–78 LITHUANIAN WRITERS AND THE EStabLISHMENT DURING LatE SOCIALISM: THE WRITERS UNION AS A PLACE FOR CONFORMISM OR ESCAPE Vilius Ivanauskas ABSTRACT This article analyses how the changes in the dominant attitude of local Soviet writers were encouraged, screened or restricted by the Writers Union [WU] through mechanisms of planning, control and even through measures of creating a secure daily environment. The author looks at the tensions and conflicts between writers of different generations, observing less ideology in the younger generation than in their predecessors since the development and dissemination of national images among the declared values of communism were increasing. The union as a system covered both aspects – conformism and the escape (manoeuvre). Though the WU had a strong mechanism of control, it managed to ensure for the writers such a model of adaptation where even those, who were subject to restrictions, had a possibility of remaining within the official structure, through certain compromises, while actually avoiding involvement in dissident activities or samizdat publishing. Introduction In August 1940 a group of Lithuanian intellectuals, most of whom were writers, went off to Moscow “to bring back Stalin’s Sunshine”, at the same time asking for Lithuania to be incorporated into the USSR. Forty eight years later in early June 1988 a few members of the local literary elite joined the initial Sąjūdis Group and from thenceforth stood in the vanguard of the National Revival. These two historic moments, witnessing two contrary breaking points in history, when Lithuanian writers were active participants in events, naturally give rise to the question of how the status and role of writers and their relationship with the Soviet regime changed. -
Memorandum of the Governor-General of the Vilna Gubernia Sviatopolk-Mirskii on the Lithuanian Latin Alphabet
89 LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 9 2004 ISSN 1392-2343 pp. 89–104 SOURCE PUBLICATIONS Memorandum of the Governor-General of the Vilna Gubernia Sviatopolk-Mirskii on the Lithuanian Latin Alphabet Algimantas Katilius This study is devoted to an important problem in Lithuanian history from the second half of the nineteenth century, namely on using the Latin alphabet and the Gothic script in Lithuanian writing and their replacement with Russian (Cyrillic) characters 1. The ban covered the period between 1864 and 1904 and it is conceived by Lithuanians as ‘a prohibition of Lithuanian publication’ by which the political and administrative authorities of the Russian Empire sought to assimilate (Russify) the Lithuanians; more precisely, it was one of the means to achieve the desired aim. On the other hand, there were assertions that in the context of the imperial policy the replacement of the traditional alphabet for the Cyrillic was linked to ‘the struggle be- tween rival influences and a desire to entrench a variant of identity which would be related to the loyalty to the empire’. 2 In Lithuania (then called the Northwest Province) it was to be a means in the struggle against Polish influence. It is worth stressing one more aspect: the period of the press ban was crucial for the self-consciousness 1 Among numerous publications on this topic the following major works could be indicated: V. Merkys, Nelegalioji lietuvių spauda kapitalizmo laikotarpiu (ligi 1904 m.). Politinės susikūrimo aplinkybės (Vilnius, 1978); id., Lietuvos valstiečiai ir spauda XIX a. pabaigoje–XX a. pradžioje (Vilnus, 1982); id., Knygnešių laikai. 1864–1904 (Vilnius, 1994); A. -
Vincas Kudirka, Martynas Jankus, Jonas Šliūpas and the Making of Modern Lithuania Charles C
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History Summer 2013 Lithuanians in the Shadow of Three Eagles: Vincas Kudirka, Martynas Jankus, Jonas Šliūpas and the Making of Modern Lithuania Charles C. Perrin Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Recommended Citation Perrin, Charles C., "Lithuanians in the Shadow of Three Eagles: Vincas Kudirka, Martynas Jankus, Jonas Šliūpas and the Making of Modern Lithuania." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2013. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/35 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LITHUANIANS IN THE SHADOW OF THREE EAGLES: VINCAS KUDIRKA, MARTYNAS JANKUS, JONAS ŠLIŪPAS AND THE MAKING OF MODERN LITHUANIA by CHARLES PERRIN Under the Direction of Hugh Hudson ABSTRACT The Lithuanian national movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was an international phenomenon involving Lithuanian communities in three countries: Russia, Germany and the United States. To capture the international dimension of the Lithuanian na- tional movement this study offers biographies of three activists in the movement, each of whom spent a significant amount of time living in one of -
Karo Archyvas Xviii
ISSN 1392-6489 Generolo Jono Þemaièio Lietuvos karo akademija KARO ARCHYVAS XVIII Vilnius 2003 1 2 Karo archyvas tæstinis Generolo Jono Þemaièio Lietuvos karo akademijos Mokslo centro leidinys Mokslinis redaktorius ir sudarytojas plk. ltn. dr. Gintautas Surgailis, Generolo Jono Þemaièio Lietuvos karo akademija. Redaktoriø kolegijos nariai: habil. dr., prof. Algirdas Aþubalis, Generolo Jono Þemaièio Lietuvos karo akademija, habil. dr., prof. Grzegosz Blaszczyk, Poznanës Adomo Mickevièiaus universitetas (Lenkijos Respublika), dr., doc. Pranas Janauskas, Vytauto Didþiojo universitetas, Humanitariniø mokslø fakultetas, dr. Eriks Jekabsons, Latvijos Respublikos karo muziejus, dr., doc. Vytautas Lesèius, Vilniaus universitetas, Istorijos fakultetas, dr. Valdas Rakutis, Vytauto Didþiojo karo muziejus, habil. dr., prof. Waldemar Rezmer, Mikalojaus Koperniko universitetas (Torûnë, Lenkijos Respublika), dr. Rimantas Zizas, Lietuvos istorijos institutas. Stilistë Jolanta Budreikienë Virðelio dailininkë Inga Dambrauskaitë Maketavo Giedrë Nevierienë © Generolo Jono Þemaièio Lietuvos karo akademija, 2003 3 TURINYS BALTØ KARYBOS SENAJAME GELEÞIES AMÞIUJE (IIV A.) BRUOÞAI (prof. habil dr. Mykolas Michelbertas, Manvydas Vitkûnas, Vilniaus universitetas) ...................................................... 8 LIETUVOS KARIUOMENËS ORGANIZACIJÀ REGLAMENTUOJANTYS DOKUMENTAI 17171775 M. (dr. Valdas Rakutis, Vytauto Didþiojo karo muziejus) ................................... 65 BAJORØ VYRØ ÁVARDIJIMAS XVIXVII A. LIETUVOS DIDÞIOSIOS KUNIGAIKÐTYSTËS KARIUOMENËS -
Darius Staliūnas HISTORIOGRAPHY of the LITHUANIAN NATIONAL
Darius Staliūnas HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE LITHUANIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT CHANGING PARADIGMS The beginning of Lithuanian national historiography and the topic of ‘National Revival’ The Lithuanian historical narrative was formed during the nineteenth century as a component part of a newly developing Lithuanian national discourse. One of the most important and most difficult tasks facing the construction of a modern Lithuanian identity was how to separate it from the Polish identity (as well as from its Russian counterpart, even though Russianness was not regarded as being so parlous for the ‘purification’ of national identity). It therefore comes as no surprise that Lithuanians construed their concept of history as an alternative to the Polish construction (and to a lesser degree to the Russian version). Most nineteenth-century Polish political movements, including schools of history, did not regard the Lithuanians as having any independent political future and so it is not surprising that they were inclined first and foremost to stress the benefits of Polish culture and civilisation in Lithuania’s past. The Lithuanians had no other option than using their authentic ethnic culture as a counterweight to Polish civilisation. Conceiving Lithuanian identity as primarily ethno-cultural values, a concept of Lithuanian history was construed accordingly. The history of Lithuania was considered to be Darius Staliūnas, ‘Historiography of the Lithuanian national movement. Changing paradigms’, in: Studies on National Movements, 1 (2013) pp. 160-182. http://snm.nise.eu Studies on National Movements, 1 (2013) | ARTICLES the history of (ethnic) Lithuanians. Topics connected with ‘national revival’ have clearly dominated in texts devoted to nineteenth-century history. -
Klaipedos Kr Dainos.Indd
Singing tradition of the Klaipėda region preserved in Lithuania and in the émigré communities In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries it was the Lithuanian songs of East Prussia that opened the way for Lithuanian language and culture into Western Europe. The elegiac folk poetry, with characteristically straightforward structure and plain subject matter, fascinated the enlightened minds of artists and scholars, kindling their imagination and providing inspiration for their own creative work. Certain ideas that originated in the Age of Enlightenment and gained currency in Western Europe, coupled with the nascent concern about the newly discovered yet already vanishing layer of traditional culture, lent an important impetus for preservation of that obsolescent culture. It was then that the Lithuanian songs were first recorded, published and researched. The network of Prussian clergymen who were the first collectors of folklore formed around Liudvikas Rėza (Ludwig Rhesa) (1776‒1840), a professor at the University of Königsberg, amassed a priceless repository of Lithuanian non-material culture, which kept growing by the effort of countless devout enthusiasts during the coming two hundred years. The present collection of Songs and Music from the Klaipėda Region is yet another contribution to this ever expanding repository. At long last we will have an opportunity to hear the real sound of what many of us have only known in the form of written down verses, notated melodies, and interpretations thereof. As a matter of fact, no sound recordings of authentic Prussian Lithuanian songs or instrumental music have been published in Lithuania in the course of the 20th century. On the other hand, there was no apparent lack of valuable materials preserved at folklore archives and informants who could have sung Lithuanian folk songs for the compilers of sound anthologies in the middle of 26 the 20th century. -
LITUANUS Cumulative Index 1954-2004 (PDF)
LITUANUS Cumulative Index 1954-2004 Art and Artists [Aleksa, Petras]. See Jautokas. 23:3 (1977) 59-65. [Algminas, Arvydas]. See Matranga. 31:2 (1985) 27-32. Anderson, Donald J. “Lithuanian Bookplates Ex Libris.” 26:4 (1980) 42-49. ——. “The Art of Algimantas Kezys.” 27:1 (1981) 49-62. ——. “Lithuanian Art: Exhibition 90 ‘My Religious Beliefs’.” 36:4 (1990) 16-26. ——. “Lithuanian Artists in North America.” 40:2 (1994) 43-57. Andriußyt∂, Rasa. “Rimvydas Jankauskas (Kampas).” 45:3 (1999) 48-56. Artists in Lithuania. “The Younger Generation of Graphic Artists in Lithuania: Eleven Reproductions.” 19:2 (1973) 55-66. [Augius, Paulius]. See Jurkus. 5:4 (1959) 118-120. See Kuraus- kas. 14:1 (1968) 40-64. Außrien∂, Nora. “Außrin∂ Marcinkeviçi∆t∂-Kerr.” 50:3 (2004) 33-34. Bagdonas, Juozas. “Profile of an Artist.” 29:4 (1983) 50-62. Bakßys Richardson, Milda. ”Juozas Jakßtas: A Lithuanian Carv- er Confronts the Venerable Oak.” 47:2 (2001) 4, 19-53. Baltrußaitis, Jurgis. “Arts and Crafts in the Lithuanian Home- stead.” 7:1 (1961) 18-21. ——. “Distinguishing Inner Marks of Roerich’s Painting.” Translated by W. Edward Brown. 20:1 (1974) 38-48. [Balukas, Vanda 1923–2004]. “The Canvas is the Message.” 28:3 (1982) 33-36. [Banys, Nijol∂]. See Kezys. 43:4 (1997) 55-61. [Barysait∂, DΩoja]. See Kuç∂nas-Foti. 44:4 (1998) 11-22. 13 ART AND ARTISTS [Bookplates and small art works]. Augusts, Gvido. 46:3 (2000) 20. Daukßait∂-Katinien∂, Irena. 26:4 (1980) 47. Eidrigeviçius, Stasys 26:4 (1980) 48. Indraßius, Algirdas. 44:1 (1998) 44. Ivanauskait∂, Jurga. 48:4 (2002) 39. -
LAIKINOJI Sostine . LIETUVIU˛ Literatu¯Roje
. LAIKINOJI SOSTINE LIETUVIU˛ LITERATU¯ROJE Viktorija Šeina . LAIKINOJI SOSTINE LIETUVIU˛ LITERAT¯UROJE Monografija lietuVių literatūros ir tautosakos INSTITUTAS Vilnius 2014 uDk 821.172.09 Še24 knygos rengimą ir leidybą pagal nacionalinę mokslo programą „Valstybė ir tauta: paveldas ir tapatumas“ finansavo lietuvos mokslo taryba (sutarties nr. VAT-49/2012) Monografija apsvarstyta ir patvirtinta leidybai lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos instituto Mokslo tarybos posėdyje 2014 m. spalio 24 d. (protokolo nr. r3-4) recenzentai: Prof. habil. dr. kęstutis nastopka Doc. dr. rita tūtlytė Dr. Mindaugas kvietkauskas redaktorė erika Malažinskaitė Dailininkas rokas Gelažius Viršelis: kauno panorama, XX a. 4 dešimtmetis. Vytauto augustino nuotr. lCVa P-33746 © Viktorija Šeina, 2014 © lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas, 2014 isBn 978-609-425-135-1 TURINYS ĮVaDas 7 tyrimų apžvalga 13 Metodologinės prieigos 20 PrieŠISTORĖ: LITERATŪRINĖ KAUNO reFLEKSIJa XViii a. PaBaiGoJe–XX a. PraDŽioJe 45 LAIKINOJi SOSTINĖ HIC ET NUNC 59 laikinosios sostinės reikšmių laukas 59 laikinoji sostinė kaip išbandymas (Vinco Mykolaičio-Putino Altorių šešėly) 98 Miestas kaip svetima erdvė (antano Miškinio poezija) 116 literatūrinis laikinosios sostinės archisiužetas ir jo veikėjai 135 LAIKINOJi SOSTINĖ iŠ ISTORINĖs PersPektYVos 153 kaunas okupacijų ūkanose 153 Pasakiškasis kauno matmuo (Juliaus kaupo urbanistinės pasakos) 166 saulėtoji kauno pusė iš už atlanto (Birutės Pūkelevičiūtės Aštuoni lapai) 180 laikinosios sostinės mitokūros lūžis išeivijoje 193 „Buržuazinio kauno“ atminties politika ir rezistencinė miesto dvasia 201 laikinosios sostinės eschatologija (Vytauto sirijos Giros Raudonmedžio rojus) 216 sugrįžtanti atmintis 230 laikinosios sostinės mitokūros gairės šiuolaikinėje literatūroje 234 iŠVaDos 253 iliustracijų šaltiniai 258 literatūros sąrašas 259 Šaltinių sąrašas 274 asmenvardžių rodyklė 277 I˛VADAS Šio tyrimo objektas yra laikinoji sostinė – ne istorinis tarpukario kau- nas, bet literatūrinis jo antrininkas, sukonstruotas pagal savitus me- ninio pasaulio principus. -
XIX A. Lietuvių Tautinio Atgimimo Sąjūdžio Įvaizdis Bendrojo Lavinimo Mokykloje
Acta humanitarica universitatis Saulensis. T. 12 (2011). 236–247. ISSN 1822-7309 XIX a. lietuvių tautinio atgimimo sąjūdžio įvaizdis bendrojo lavinimo mokykloje Arūnas GUMULIAUSKAS Šiaulių universitetas Pagrindinės sąvokos: XIX a. lietuvių tautinio atgimimo sąjūdis, Jonas Basa- navičius, Vincas Kudirka, Jonas Šliūpas, Mindaugas, Vytautas Didysis, Maironis, Simonas Daukantas, Motiejus Valančius, Juozas Tumas-Vaižgantas, Jonas Jablons- kis, „Aušra“, „Varpas“, daraktoriai. Pirmąsias žinias apie savo tautos istorinę praeitį jaunuoliai dažniausiai įgyja dar mokyklos suole. Čia formuojamas pilietinis mokinių požiūris į valstybę, jos istori- ją. Mokyklai skirtas ypatingas vaidmuo patriotiškai auklėjant jaunąją kartą. Sunku paneigti tą faktą, jog šiame procese didžiausias krūvis tenka istorijos ir kitiems humanitariniams mokslams. Norint išsiaiškinti jaunuolių požiūrį į XIX a. lietuvių tautinio atgimimo sąjūdį, buvo atlikta apklausa, kurioje dalyvavo Šiaulių miesto gimnazijų III ir IV klasių moksleiviai, taip pat Šiaulių universiteto Humanitarinio fakulteto įvairių kursų studentai. Beje, analogiškas tyrimas atliktas 2006 m., kada norėta atskleisti kry- žiaus karų įvaizdžio formavimo Lietuvos bendrojo lavinimo mokyklose peripetijas (Gumuliauskas 2007, 319). Šį kartą į 11 klausimų atsakė 243 respondentai. Studentų išreikšta pozicija padėjo praplėsti lokalinio požiūrio į rūpimą problemą ribas. Apklausos rezultatai parodė, kad istorijos mokymosi tendencijos bendrojo lavinimo mokykloje išlieka stabilios. 2006 m. 84,8 % respondentų nurodė vado- vėlį, -
Balio Sruogos Laiškai Įvairiems Asmenims: „Sursum Corda!“
Lietuvių katalikų mokslo akademijos metraštis, vilnius, 2020, t. 43. issN 1392-0502 BaLio sRuoGos LaiŠkai ĮvaiRiems asmeNims: „suRsum CoRda!“ NeRiNGa maRkeviČieNĖ Įvadas. straipsnio1 tikslas – pristatyti Balio sruogos laiškų įvairiems as- menims rinkinį (1911–1947), kuris rekonstruotas ištyrus Lietuvos (vilniaus, kauno, Šiaulių) ir pasaulio (jav, Rusijos) atminties institucijose saugomus rašytojo egodokumentus2. siekiant šio tikslo, naudojantis analitiniu apra- šomuoju metodu, svarbu: 1) aptarti šio sruogos laiškų rinkinio korpusą, 2) aprašyti laiškų tematiką3, 3) pabrėžti sruogos laiškų ir atsiminimų apie jį sąsajas, nurodant naujai išryškėjančias detales ir iki šiol nežinotus ar ma- žai aktualintus faktus apie rašytojo asmenybę, jo veiklą ir gyvenimą, 4) ak- centuoti laiškuose atsispindinčius sruogos grožinės kūrybos fragmentus, svarbius genezės, recepcijos aspektais, 5) įvardyti tekstologines problemas. sruogos laiškai įvairiems asmenims iki šiol nebuvo surinkti, chronologiš- kai susieti, todėl jų visuma dar nėra tapusi analizės objektu, nepublikuota. Nedaug sruogos laiškų įvairiems asmenims tirta lingvistiniu, kreipimo- si formų aspektu4. sruogos laiškų medžiaga daugiausia rėmėsi algis samu- lionis5. jis ir pradėjo registruoti Lietuvoje saugomus sruogos laiškus paties kruopščiai suplanuotiems sruogos raštams, rengė laiškų rankraščių nuora- šus – darė autografų kopijas perrašinėdamas ranka ir spausdinimo mašinė- 1 straipsnis parengtas vykdant Lietuvos mokslo tarybos fnansuojamą projektą „Balio sruogos elektroninis laiškų (1911–1947)