DOCSLIB.ORG

Scoping Summary: Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Scoping Summary SCOPING SUMMARY: APPENDIX December 2012 P a g e | i December 2012 APPENDIX NOTICE OF INTENT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO EXTEND THE FORMAL COMMENT PERIOD ........................................ 2 PUBLIC SCOPING PRESENTATION ................................................................................................................. 6 AGENCY SCOPING PRESENTATION ............................................................................................................. 11 PUBLIC SCOPING DISPLAY BOARDS ............................................................................................................ 17 PUBLIC SCOPING COMMENT CARD AND HANDOUT ....................................................................................... 36 AGENCY SCOPING INVITATIONS ................................................................................................................. 41 NEC FUTURE Scoping Summary: Appendix | December 2012 1 NOTICE OF INTENT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO EXTEND THE FORMAL COMMENT PERIOD NEC FUTURE Scoping Summary: Appendix | December 2012 2 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2012 / Notices 37737 The FHWA is currently developing to evaluate potential passenger rail considered, environmental effects to be the TNM version 3.0, with anticipated improvements between Washington, considered and evaluated, and beta-testing of this version towards the DC, New York City, and Boston, MA. methodologies to be used for evaluating end of 2012. Version 3.0 is an entirely FRA is leading the planning and effects. new, state-of-the-art computer program environmental evaluation of the DATES: Submit comments by Friday, used for predicting noise impacts in the Northeast Corridor (NEC), an effort September 14, 2012. See the NEC vicinity of highways. It uses advances in known as NEC FUTURE, in close FUTURE Web site (www.necfuture.com) personal computer hardware and coordination with the involved states, for information on the scoping meeting software to improve upon the accuracy Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and dates. and ease of modeling highway noise, Operations Advisory Commission (NEC ADDRESSES: Interested parties are including the design of effective, cost- Commission), Amtrak and other encouraged to comment on-line at the efficient highway noise barriers. This stakeholders. The purpose of the NEC NEC FUTURE Web site information request is to gather FUTURE program is to define current (www.necfuture.com), via email at information from the beta-testers on and future markets for improved rail [email protected], or in person at the their computer configurations, their service and capacity on the NEC, scoping meetings. For Further experiences using the FWHA TNM and develop an integrated passenger rail Information or Special Assistance the availability of TNM files. transportation solution to incrementally Contact: Rebecca Reyes-Alicea, USDOT, Respondents: Approximately 25 meet those needs, and create a regional Federal Railroad Administration, Office entities. planning framework to engage of Railroad Policy & Development, 1200 Frequency: Once. stakeholders throughout the region in New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, Estimated Average Burden per the development of the program. DC 20590; by email at Response: Approximately 15 minutes. NEC FUTURE is being advanced [email protected], or; through the Estimated Total Annual Burden consistent with the federal High-Speed NEC FUTURE Web site Hours: Approximately 6.25 hours. Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) (www.necfuture.com). Public Comments Invited: You are program and includes the development asked to comment on any aspect of this of a Passenger Rail Corridor Investment SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FRA is information collection, including: (1) Plan (PRCIP). A PRCIP provides the data preparing a Tier 1 EIS and SDP for the Whether the proposed collection is necessary to support an FRA decision to NEC FUTURE program. Together the necessary for the FHWA’s performance; fund and implement major investments EIS and SDP comprise a PRCIP that will (2) the accuracy of the estimated in a passenger rail corridor. A PRCIP is define a comprehensive and integrated burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to comprised of two components: A Tier 1 passenger rail network in the Northeast enhance the quality, usefulness, and EIS and a Service Development Plan region, looking at a range of service clarity of the collected information; and (SDP). The Tier 1 EIS will be developed types and infrastructure needs, (4) ways that the burden could be in accordance with the National including plans for public investment in minimized, including the use of Environmental Policy Act of 1969 projects that contribute towards efficient electronic technology, without reducing (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 and the Council service and increased capacity for the quality of the collected information. on Environmental Quality (CEQ) intercity and high-speed passenger rail The agency will summarize and/or regulations, 40 CFR part 1500 et seq., and freight and commuter rail service. include your comments in the request and will address documentation on a The PRCIP will provide the economic, for OMB’s clearance of this information broad corridor level. The SDP financial, transportation and collection. articulates the overall scope, environmental analyses necessary to alternatives, approach and business case support an investment in improved rail Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act service as a core component of a more of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended; for proposed service and improvements. and 49 CFR 1.48. As part of the Tier 1 EIS, FRA will integrated, efficient, safer, and higher- evaluate various passenger rail capacity Northeast regional Issued On: June 19, 2012. alternatives: A No Action Alternative, transportation network. Steven Smith, consisting of already planned The FRA will use a tiered Chief, Information Technology Division. improvements to the corridor, and Build environmental review process for [FR Doc. 2012–15362 Filed 6–21–12; 8:45 am] Alternatives consisting of a full array of complying with NEPA, as per the CEQ BILLING CODE 4910–22–P passenger rail alternatives which could regulations, 40 CFR 1508.28, and in range from operational and service accordance with FRA’s Procedures for enhancements to new physical Considering Environmental Impacts, 64 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION improvements. FRA will consider the FR 28454 (FRA Environmental type, location and need for ancillary Procedures). The Tier 1 EIS will also Federal Railroad Administration facilities for each alternative. The address the requirements of Section 106 primary passenger rail route is the of the National Historic Preservation Environmental Impact Statement for existing NEC passenger rail spine and Act, 36 CFR Part 800, Section 4(f) of the the Northeast Corridor Between its connecting corridors; however, in U.S. Department of Transportation Act Washington, DC, New York, NY, and some areas, FRA may consider of 1966, 49 U.S.C. 303, and other Boston, MA alternatives off of the existing NEC. applicable Federal and state laws and AGENCY: Federal Railroad FRA is issuing this Notice to alert the regulations. The outcome of the Tier 1 Administration (FRA), DOT. public and agencies about the EIS will be to identify markets to be ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an preparation of the Tier 1 EIS and served, service(s), general alignment and environmental impact statement. associated SDP. To ensure that all station locations. significant issues are identified and The NEC FUTURE program is SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this Notice of considered, all interested parties are intended to develop a rail transportation Intent (Notice) to advise the public of invited to comment on the proposed investment program to support the the preparation of a Tier 1 scope of environmental review, project Northeast region’s economic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) purpose and need, alternatives to be competitiveness and growth potential NEC FUTURE Scoping Summary: Appendix | December 2012 3 VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Jun 21, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 37738 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 121 / Friday, June 22, 2012 / Notices with energy-efficient and sustainable alternatives could also be service- or Rebecca Reyes-Alicea at the mailing transportation services. For purposes of operation-related that provide rail address above or electronically at defining and analyzing transportation service to new markets or change [email protected]. alternatives for NEC FUTURE, the study existing patterns of service. In addition, Comments will be accepted on the area has been broadly defined to there may be Build Alternatives off the scoping of the EIS in meetings, through encompass the region served by the existing NEC spine or its connecting the NEC FUTURE Web site NEC, plus those areas that can be corridors. (www.necfuture.com) and by submitting reached from the NEC directly by train written comments to Rebecca Reyes- Possible Effects or via a single transfer to connecting Alicea at the address above. The formal corridors (e.g., the Empire Corridor in FRA will evaluate direct, indirect and comment period for scoping will be New York). The study area may be cumulative changes to the social, open from the date of this Notice until refined as the NEC FUTURE program economic, and physical environment, Friday, September 14, 2012. progresses and off-corridor
Recommended publications
  • 40Thanniv Ersary

    40Thanniv Ersary

    Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971.
  • Inventory by Stakeholder Stakeholder ITS Element Status

    Inventory by Stakeholder Stakeholder ITS Element Status

    Inventory by Stakeholder Stakeholder ITS Element Status Amtrak Amtrak Customer Information System Existing Amtrak Emergency Response Vehicles Existing Amtrak Fare Management System Existing Amtrak Operations Center Existing Amtrak Police Dispatch Existing Amtrak Terminal Planned Amtrak Trains Existing Amtrak Website Existing Archive Data Users Archived Data Users Existing Bridgeport Port Authority Bridgeport Port Authority Planned Capitol Region TOC Capitol Region TOC Planned City of Bridgeport City of Bridgeport Parking Management System Planned City of Bridgeport Planning and Economic Planned Development City of Bridgeport Police Department- DELETE Planned City of Bridgeport Traffic Operations Center- DELETE Planned Greater Bridgeport PRESTO Planned Greater Bridgeport Transit VMS Planned City of Danbury City of Danbury CCTV Planned City of Hartford City of Hartford DMS Planned City of Hartford Event Committee Planned City of Hartford Website Planned City of Hartford Fire Department City of Hartford Fire Alarms and Signals Division Planned City of Hartford Fire Alarms and Signals Division Planned Maintenance Vehicles City of Hartford Fire Vehicles Planned City of Hartford Office of Emergency Management Hartford EOC Planned City of Hartford Police Department City of Hartford Police Vehicles Planned City of Hartford Public Safety Dispatch Planned City of Hartford Public Works Connecticut Statewide ITS Architecture Inventory by Stakeholder Page 1 of 9 Stakeholder ITS Element Status City of Harford Public Works RWIS Planned City of Hartford
  • Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-Of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016

    Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-Of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016

    Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-17/02 National PB2018-100263 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-17/02 PB2018-100263 Notation 57150 Adopted November 14, 2017 Railroad Accident Report Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2017. Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment, Chester, Pennsylvania, April 3, 2016. NTSB/RAR-17/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: On April 3, 2016, about 7:50 a.m. eastern daylight time, southbound Amtrak train 89 (train 89) struck a backhoe with a worker inside at milepost 15.7 near Chester, Pennsylvania. The train was authorized to operate on main track 3 (track 3) at the maximum authorized speed of 110 mph. Beginning on the morning of April 1, Amtrak had scheduled track-bed restoration―ballast vacuuming—at milepost 15.7 on track 2 on the Philadelphia to Washington Line. Track 2 had to be taken out of service between control points Baldwin (milepost 11.7) and Hook (milepost 16.8) for the 55 hour duration of the project. As train 89 approached milepost 15.7, the locomotive engineer saw equipment and workers on and near track 3 and initiated an emergency brake application. The train speed was 106 mph before the emergency brake application and 99 mph when it struck the backhoe. Two roadway workers were killed, and 39 other people were injured. Amtrak estimated property damages to be $2.5 million.
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide

    Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide

    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
  • 2019-2020 Catalog

    2019-2020 Catalog

    SHAWNEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2019-2020 CATALOG Volume XXXIII Student Centered, Community Connected www.shawneecc.edu Main Campus 8364 Shawnee College Road Ullin, IL 62992 (618) 634-3200 (618) 634-3300 (fax) (800) 481-2242 Anna Cairo Metropolis Vienna Extension Center Extension Center Extension Center Extension Center 1150 E. Vienna 2035 Washington St 5385 Industrial Park Vienna High School Anna, IL 62906 Cairo, IL 62914 Road 601 N. 6th Street (618) 833-3399 (618) 634-3490 Metropolis, IL 62960 Vienna, IL 62995 (618) 524-3003 (618) 634-3441 Accredited by: Recognized by: The Higher Learning Commission Illinois Community College Board 230 South LaSalle Street, Suite 7-500 Illinois Board of Higher Education Chicago, IL 60604-1411 Illinois State Board of Education Illinois Department of Veteran Affairs An Institutional Member of: Our Mission: Southern Illinois Collegiate Common Market Shawnee Community College's mission is 3213 S Park Avenue to serve the needs of the student and our Herrin, IL 62948 diverse community by providing quality (618) 942-6902 higher education, community education, training and services that are accessible, affordable and promote life-long learning. SHAWNEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FACTS Shawnee Community College, located in Ullin, Illinois, is one of 48, two-year, open-admission colleges of the Illinois Community College System, organized under the Illinois Public Community College Act. The College is located on 152 acres of rolling hills and woods just a few miles north of the Ohio river and near the scenic Cache River Wetlands. One of the most beautiful community college campuses in Illinois, Shawnee consists of the original "Rustic Campus" that now houses area agencies, the main campus buildings which covers over 140,000 square feet and a 7,200 square foot Career and Technical Education Center.
  • Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2019-2045)

    Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2019-2045)

    SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FY 2019-2045 ADOPTED: March 20, 2019 SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FY 2019-2045 ADOPTED: March 20, 2019 Prepared by the Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments in cooperation with the Connecticut Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. 5 Connecticut Avenue Norwich, CT 06360 Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments Representatives: Town of BOZRAH Glenn Pianka, First Selectman Town of COLCHESTER Art Shilosky, First Selectman Town of EAST LYME Mark Nickerson, First Selectman Town of FRANKLIN Charles Grant, First Selectman Town of GRISWOLD Todd Babbitt, First Selectman Borough of JEWETT CITY Alan Geer, Warden City of GROTON Keith Hedrick, Mayor Town of GROTON Patrice Granatosky, Mayor, alternate John Burt, Town Manager Town of LEBANON Betsy Petrie, First Selectman Town of LEDYARD Fred Allyn, III, Mayor Town of LISBON Thomas Sparkman, First Selectman Town of MONTVILLE Ron McDaniel, Mayor City of NEW LONDON Michael Passero, Mayor Town of NORTH STONINGTON Michael Urgo, First Selectman City of NORWICH Peter Nystrom, Mayor, alternate John Salomone, City Manager Town of PRESTON Robert Congdon, First Selectman Town of SALEM Kevin Lyden, First Selectman Town of SPRAGUE Catherine Osten, First Selectman Town of STONINGTON Rob Simmons, First Selectman Borough of STONINGTON Jeffrey Callahan, Warden Town of WATERFORD Daniel Steward, First Selectman Town of WINDHAM Victor Funderburk, Mayor, alternate Jim Rivers, Town Manager Staff Assisting in the Preparation of this Report Sam Alexander, AICP, Planner II James S. Butler, AICP, Executive Director Liz Crutcher, GIS Coordinator Amanda Kennedy, AICP, Assistant Director/Director of Special Projects Wendy Leclair, Office Manager Justin LaFountain, Planner II Carly Myers, AICP, Planner II Katherine D.
  • Amtrak Schedule Boston to New London Ct

    Amtrak Schedule Boston to New London Ct

    Amtrak Schedule Boston To New London Ct Desmund passes his riggers platitudinize unseasonably, but carvel-built Kingsly never decerebrates so peristaltically. Is Madison psychosomatic or necrological when liked some Hussite standardizing someday? Tearfully arrestive, Tabby muddies postfixes and keel percipient. Can choose between new london is the schedule to amtrak boston new london are indirect subsidiaries of texas to What distance on cheap train steams into regular bedroom a new amtrak to london to. Thank you for the great website! At the time, costs passengers significant time. Thank you again for taking the time to write such an educational article. Please change them and try again. Text messages may be transmitted automatically. Unlike in Europe with keycards for entry, Mexico, LLC. Completed by painter Thomas Sergeant La Farge, Sharon and South Attleboro, as well as the office instigator of celebratory vodka shots. Registration was successful console. Both are indirect subsidiaries of Bank of America Corporation. Others enjoy the flexibility offered by connecting journeys. You will not have to do any transfers, and always strive to get better. PDF нижче длѕ ознайомленнѕ з нашими новими умовами прокату. Each of the following pages has route information. Cons: The conductor has no humor, CT? Each train has different equipment and loading procedures that dictate what service will be offered. Visit with the Athearn team and see our latest models.
  • SCRCOG MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA September 25, 2019

    SCRCOG MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA September 25, 2019

    SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bethany Branford East Haven Guilford Hamden Madison Meriden Milford New Haven North Branford North Haven Orange Wallingford West Haven Woodbridge Carl J. Amento, Executive Director SCRCOG MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA September 25, 2019 – 10:00 A.M. Location: 127 Washington Avenue, 4th Floor West North Haven, CT 06473 Full agenda materials can be found at our website – www.scrcog.org 1. Call to Order and Introductions – First Selectman Thomas Banisch, Chairman 2. Presentation: 2020 Census Report- Paul Fabula, Partnership Specialist, Field Division, U.S. Census Bureau; Jimmy Tickey, Senior Advisor, Lt. Governor Susan Bysiewicz 3. Adoption of 8/28/19 SCRCOG Meeting Minutes – First Selectman Michael Freda, Secretary Pages 2-4 4. Treasurer’s Report for month ending 8/31/19 –First Selectman Matthew Hoey, Treasurer Pages 5, 6 5. Transportation Committee Report – Mayor William Dickinson, Committee Chairman Adopt Resolution to Approve TAP Project Priorities 6. Congressional Reports – Louis Mangini, Aide to U.S. Representative Rosa DeLauro; Ellen Graham, Aide to U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal; David Tusio, Aide to U.S. Senator Christopher Murphy 7. State Legislative Reports—Michael Muszynski, CCM; Betsy Gara, COST 8. SCRCOG Executive Director’s Report – Carl Amento, Executive Director 9. REX Development Report – Ginny Kozlowski, Executive Director, REX Development Pages 7, 8 10. DESPP/DEMHS Report –Jacob Manke, Region 2 Coordinator; Robert Kenny, Region 1 Coordinator Page 9 11. CT Rides Quarterly Reports- Joanne Cavadini, Outreach Coordinator Attached 12. Regional Planning Commission September Action Table Page 10 13. Regional Cooperation/Other Business 14. Adjournment The agenda and attachments for this meeting are available on our website at www.scrcog.org.
  • Ctrides Quarterly Report

    Ctrides Quarterly Report

    CTrides.com 1-877- CTrides (287-4337) Quarterly Report [email protected] July —September 2018 CTrides: Quarter 3 Marketing Activity Summary July - September 2018 CTrides launched a couple of new programs in Quarter 3. The college month campaign was reinvented with new initiatives and a name and a new Transit Rewards Program was developed. In addition to these new programs, the marketing team organized and implemented a New Haven Union Station redevelopment survey. Road Scholar During the month of September, CTrides organized and executed a back-to-school month campaign for college students. The campaign focused on transportation options for college students around their campuses and across the State of Connecticut. The central theme of the campaign was, “Become a Road Scholar.” This campaign required extensive preparation from the marketing team. One of the main brochures given out during this campaign highlighted the transportation options for each participating college and university. The brochures were customized outlines for each school and its surrounding transportation options. Working with the proper state agencies, the marketing team compiled the transportation information for each location, designed each customized brochure, and printed them for distribution at events. In addition to the customized brochures, t-shirts and other giveaway items were developed for promotion. Coordination between the marketing team, outreach team, and individual schools was imperative for the success of this campaign. Events were held at each of the 23 participating schools throughout the month. Transit Rewards The marketing team coordinated and launch a new rewards program called, Transit Rewards, during Quarter 3. This program is designed to benefit area businesses, restaurants and attractions from across the state and encourage transit ridership on Hartford Line, CTfastrak, and Shore Line East.
  • Northeast Corridor-Boston-Washington DC

    Northeast Corridor-Boston-Washington DC

    Effective January 25 - March 22, 2020 TEMPORARY TRACKWORK SCHEDULE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR - Southbound serving BOSTON - PROVIDENCE - GREENFIELD - SPRINGFIELD - HARTFORD - NEW HAVEN - NEW YORK - WASHINGTON, DC and intermediate stations Amtrak.com 1-800-USA-RAIL Northeast Northeast Northeast Northeast Northeast Northeast Northeast Train Name4 Acela Acela Acela Acela Acela Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Train Number4 65 67 2151 141 143 2153 2249 95 2155 195 2251 157 Normal Days of Operation4 FrSa Su-Th Mo-Fr Mo-Fr SaSu Mo-Fr Sa Mo-Fr Mo-Fr SaSu Sa Su Will Also Operate4 2/16 2/17 2/16 2/17 2/16 2/17 Will Not Operate4 2/16 2/17 2/17 2/17 2/17 2/17 2/16 R B y R B y R B x R B R B R B x R B x R B R B x R B R B x R B On Board Service4 QlåO QlåO y Q å y Q å y Q å y Q å y Q å y Q å y Q å y Q å y Q å y Q å BOSTON, MA - Mile Dp l9 30P l9 30P 5 05A 6 05A 6 05A 6 10A 7 15A 6 35A 8 05A –South Station 0 Boston, MA–Back Bay Station - 1 9 36P 9 36P 5 10A 6 11A 6 10A 6 15A 7 20A 6 40A 8 10A Route 128, MA - 11 l9 50P l9 50P 5 19A 6 21A 6 20A 6 25A 7 29A 6 50A 8 20A Providence, RI i1 - 43 l10 22P l10 22P 5 40A 6 43A 6 41A 6 50A 7 50A 7 15A 8 40A Kingston, RI b2 - 70 10 48P 10 48P 7 11A 7 36A Westerly, RI - 87 11 05P 11 05P 7 25A 7 50A Mystic, CT 96 11 17P 11 17P New London, CT (Casino b) - 105 11 31P 11 31P 6 24A 7 45A 8 12A Old Saybrook, CT - 123 11 53P 11 53P 8 04A 8 31A Greenfield, MA 0 5 45A Northampton, MA 18 6 10A Holyoke, MA 28 t 6 25A SPRINGFIELD, MA - 36 Ar 6 53A Dp 5 15A 5 55A 6 00A 7 05A 7 25A 7 58A Windsor Locks, CT
  • The Reality of Failing to Fund Transportation

    The Reality of Failing to Fund Transportation

    The Reality of Failing to Fund Transportation “I depend on VTD to get me to work and If I don’t have you guys to get me back and forth to work, what am I going to do? I’m struggling now at the $3.50 level and now am possibly I going to the $4 level – that’s $8 dollars a day to go back and forth to work! I really depend on this service; it is a good service. I hope everything works out. I really depend on VTD to get me where I have to go, and that is mainly to work.” Tonya C., Valley Transit District bus rider Prepared by the Connecticut Association For Community Transportation (CACT) 1 “A strong transportation system is critical to the economy of the state, and it’s certainly no coincidence that we have lost Connecticut-based businesses to those states that have such a transportation system.” Jim Gildea, President, Connecticut Commuter Rail Council Proposing a Dead State: Transportation & Infrastructure in 2018 and Beyond CACT has long been advocating for a strong Connecticut by supporting the criss-crossing lifeline infrastructure that is Connecticut’s transportation. Indeed, every year, more and more people rely on public transportation to get to and from work, to schools, universities, healthcare visits, shopping and to see family and friends. A vital and robust transportation network is fundamental to Connecticut’s prosperity: now and in the future. It just makes sense: if people can’t get to where they’re going, they’ll either not get there (loss of money, loss of spending, loss of time) or start the dangerous consideration that compared to other states, Connecticut lacks the necessary arteries to conduct business.
  • SCRCOG Agenda August 2020

    SCRCOG Agenda August 2020

    SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bethany Branford East Haven Guilford Hamden Madison Meriden Milford New Haven North Branford North Haven Orange Wallingford West Haven Woodbridge Carl J. Amento, Executive Director SCRCOG MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA August 26, 2020 – 10:00 A.M. Location: 127 Washington Avenue, 4th Floor West, North Haven, CT 06473 NOTICE: As permitted by Governor Lamont’s Executive Order 7B Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic, this meeting is being held remotely with no in-person attendance Log-on Information to attend this meeting remotely is provided below: Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84151928202 Call-In Number: +1-929-205-6099 Meeting ID: 841 5192 8202 The agenda and attachments for this meeting are posted and are available on our website at www.scrcog.org. 1. Call to Order and Introductions – First Selectman Beth Heller, Chair 2. Presentation: DOT Deputy Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto 3. Adoption of 7/22/20 SCRCOG Meeting Minutes – First Selectman Matthew Hoey, Secretary Pages 2-4 4. Treasurer’s Report for month ending 7/31/20 –First Selectman James Zeoli, Treasurer Pages 5, 6 5. Transportation Committee Report – Mayor William Dickinson, Committee Chairman Pages 7-14 a) Adopt Resolution to Approve FY 2018-2021 TIP Amendment Twenty Five Pages 10,11 b) Adopt Resolution to Approve FTA Section 5310 Program Priorities Resolution Pages 13,14 6. State Legislative Reports- Michael Muszynski, CCM; Betsy Gara, COST 7. Congressional Reports – Louis Mangini, Aide to U.S. Representative Rosa DeLauro, Ellen Graham, Aide to U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal, Lillian McKenzie, Aide to U.S.