DOCSLIB.ORG

Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2019-2045)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2019-2045) SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FY 2019-2045 ADOPTED: March 20, 2019 SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FY 2019-2045 ADOPTED: March 20, 2019 Prepared by the Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments in cooperation with the Connecticut Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. 5 Connecticut Avenue Norwich, CT 06360 Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments Representatives: Town of BOZRAH Glenn Pianka, First Selectman Town of COLCHESTER Art Shilosky, First Selectman Town of EAST LYME Mark Nickerson, First Selectman Town of FRANKLIN Charles Grant, First Selectman Town of GRISWOLD Todd Babbitt, First Selectman Borough of JEWETT CITY Alan Geer, Warden City of GROTON Keith Hedrick, Mayor Town of GROTON Patrice Granatosky, Mayor, alternate John Burt, Town Manager Town of LEBANON Betsy Petrie, First Selectman Town of LEDYARD Fred Allyn, III, Mayor Town of LISBON Thomas Sparkman, First Selectman Town of MONTVILLE Ron McDaniel, Mayor City of NEW LONDON Michael Passero, Mayor Town of NORTH STONINGTON Michael Urgo, First Selectman City of NORWICH Peter Nystrom, Mayor, alternate John Salomone, City Manager Town of PRESTON Robert Congdon, First Selectman Town of SALEM Kevin Lyden, First Selectman Town of SPRAGUE Catherine Osten, First Selectman Town of STONINGTON Rob Simmons, First Selectman Borough of STONINGTON Jeffrey Callahan, Warden Town of WATERFORD Daniel Steward, First Selectman Town of WINDHAM Victor Funderburk, Mayor, alternate Jim Rivers, Town Manager Staff Assisting in the Preparation of this Report Sam Alexander, AICP, Planner II James S. Butler, AICP, Executive Director Liz Crutcher, GIS Coordinator Amanda Kennedy, AICP, Assistant Director/Director of Special Projects Wendy Leclair, Office Manager Justin LaFountain, Planner II Carly Myers, AICP, Planner II Katherine D. Rattan, AICP, Planner III/Program Manager Contents 1. Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................ 1 2. Population and Development .............................................................................................. 3 3. Goals and Strategies .......................................................................................................... 11 4. Performance Measures ...................................................................................................... 14 5. Transportation Facilities .................................................................................................... 18 Highway..................................................................................................................................... 18 Bridges ...................................................................................................................................... 31 Active Transportation ............................................................................................................... 33 Transit ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Paratransit ................................................................................................................................. 38 Ride Sharing .............................................................................................................................. 39 Rail ............................................................................................................................................. 42 Air .............................................................................................................................................. 43 Marine ....................................................................................................................................... 44 6. Technology ......................................................................................................................... 45 Autonomous Vehicles and Connected Vehicles ....................................................................... 45 Alternative Fuels ....................................................................................................................... 46 ITS .............................................................................................................................................. 48 7. Homeland Security and Disaster Preparedness................................................................. 49 8. Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 51 9. Public Participation and Consultation................................................................................ 53 10. Recommended Projects ..................................................................................................... 59 Highest Priority Projects ........................................................................................................... 59 FY 2019-2045 List of Projects .................................................................................................... 61 11. Fiscal Constraint ................................................................................................................. 67 APPENDIX A - SCCOG V/C Ratios ..................................................................................................... A APPENDIX B – Locally Submitted Projects Not Included in Conformity Analysis ........................... B APPENDIX C - Acronyms Relating To Transportation ................................................................... 75 List of Figures Figure 1 Location Map Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments ................................. 2 Figure 2 Generalized Land Use ....................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3 Population Density By Census Block Group .................................................................... 10 Figure 4 Transportation Facilities ................................................................................................. 18 Figure 5 Average Daily Traffic: % Change 2014-2017 ................................................................... 25 Figure 6 Significant Traffic Generators ......................................................................................... 26 Figure 7 SCCOG 3-Year Crash Incidence, UConn Connecticut Crash Data Repository ................. 28 Figure 8 SCCOG 3 Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes ............................................................... 29 Figure 9 Corridors (2017 SCCOG CMP Report) ............................................................................. 30 Figure 10 Southeastern CT Bridge Ratings .................................................................................... 32 Figure 11 Existing Bicycle Facilities ............................................................................................... 35 Figure 12 Commuter Lots Average Occupancy Rate .................................................................... 40 Figure 13 Connecticut's Existing Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment (2017) ............................ 47 Figure 14 SCCOG Intelligent Transportation Systems .................................................................. 49 List of Tables Table 1 Performance Measures: Safety, Bridges And Pavements, System Performance, Air Quality, And Freight ...................................................................................................................... 16 Table 2 Transit Performance Measures ........................................................................................ 17 Table 3 Public Participation and Consultation Process................................................................. 55 Table 4 Comments Received on Draft MTP .................................................................................. 57 Table 5 Proposed 2019-2045 Transportation Project List ............................................................ 62 Table 6 Allocation of Anticipated FHWA Funds………………………………………………………………..…….. 68 Table 7 Expected Revenue for Transit Projects………………………….……………………………………………. 69 1. Purpose and Need The Southeastern Connecticut Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2019-2045(MTP) was prepared by the Southern Connecticut Council of Governments (SCCOG) in cooperation with the Connecticut Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. This MTP supersedes the “Long Range Regional Transportation Plan FY2015-2040" (LRTP 2015) which can be found at www.seccog.org. The SCCOG undertook this update of the LRTP 2015 in compliance with federal regulation, 23 CFR 450.324(a) which requires: “MPOs shall review and update the transportation plan at least every 4 years in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas to confirm the transportation plan's validity and consistency with current and forecasted transportation and land use conditions and trends and to extend the forecast period to at least a 20-year planning horizon”. In addition, the MPO may revise the transportation plan at any time using the procedures in this section without a requirement to extend the horizon year. The MPO shall approve the transportation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contract Summary
    I-95 NEW HAVEN HARBOR CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Haven, East Haven, Branford, CT TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2012 VERSION 3.0 Prepared For: Connecticut Department of Transportation 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, Connecticut 06131-7546 Submitted by: Parsons Brinckerhoff 148 Eastern Boulevard, Suite 200 Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 I-95 New Haven Harbor Crossing Corridor Transportation Management Plan Improvement Program Version 3.0 Branford, East Haven, New Haven November 2012 Table of Contents Section Page • Letter of Endorsement 3 • Preface 4 • TMP Distribution 6 • Revision History / Change Management Process 10 • List of Acronyms 13 • Executive Summary 14 • TMP Roles and Responsibilities 17 • Program Project Descriptions 21 • Existing and Future Conditions 27 • Work Zone Impact Assessment 30 • Work Zone Impacts Management Strategies 34 − Temporary Traffic Control 34 − Transportation Operations 38 − Public Information / Public Outreach 40 • Monitoring 45 • Implementation Costs 51 • Appendix 1 I-95 New Haven Harbor Crossing Corridor Transportation Management Plan Improvement Program Version 3.0 Branford, East Haven, New Haven November 2012 Reference Documents Note: PDF files of the Reference Documents are included on the attached disk. • Accident Reports & Tables • Contract Plans and Special Provisions (See the Appendix for Lists) − Contract B − Contract E − Reconstruction of I-95 NB in the Long Wharf Area − Reconstruction of Waterfront Street − Route 34 East Downtown Crossing − Reconstruction of I-95 Over
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Ellen Jukoski
    EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Academic Degrees: Ed.D. The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee. Curriculum and Instruction, Higher Education, 1983. Dissertation: “Accreditation of Selected Non-Traditional Colleges and Universities.” M.A. College of St. Rose, Albany, New York. English, 1979. M.S. State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York. Curriculum Planning and Development, 1974. B.A. College of St. Rose, Albany, New York. English/Secondary Education. Cum Laude, 1973. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPERIENCE: 1995-Present: President, Mitchell College, New London, Connecticut 1994-1995: Acting President and Academic Vice President, Mitchell College, New London, Connecticut 1990-1995: Academic Vice President and Dean of the College, Mitchell College, New London, Connecticut 1988-1990: Assistant Vice President for Academic Instruction, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut 1985-1988: Dean of Continuing Education, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut 1983-1985: Director, University Without Walls Program, Loretto Heights College, Denver, Colorado 1981-1983: Associate Director, National Institute of Mental Health Federal Grant Project, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 1980-1983: Staff Member, Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 1980-1981: Program Assistant, Institute for Academic Improvement, Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 1979-1980: Assistant Executive Dean, World University-Miami, Miami, Florida 1977-1979: Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 – June 30, 2021
    TOWN OF STONINGTON, CONNECTICUT ADOPTED BUDGET For the Fiscal Year July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021 In accordance with Governor Lamont’s executive order 7HH the Annual Town Meeting was not held this year. The budget and mil rate were adopted at a joint special virtual meeting of the Board of Selectmen and Board of Finance on Tuesday, May 12, 2020. TOWN OF STONINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS 2020-2021 ADOPTED BUDGET PAGE BUDGET MESSAGE INTRODUCTION Budget Calendar 1 Town Information & Demographics 2 Building Permits 8 Top Ten Taxpayers 9 Principal Officials 10 Organization Chart 11 Property Tax on a Residential Home with a Median Market Value of $315,800 12 Property Tax Revenue per Capita 13 Revenue/Expenditure Pie Charts 14 Fund Balance History 16 Mill Rate Calculation 17 Mill Rate Impact Summary 18 Revenue Summary 19 Expenditure Summary 21 FIRST SELECTMAN Office of Selectman 35 Programs & Agencies 35 Waterfront Commission 36 Pawcatuck River Harbor Management 36 Shellfish Commission 36 Economic Development Commission 36 Commission to Study Needs & Use of Town Buildings 37 Beautification Committee 37 Charter Revision Committee 37 Emergency Management 37 Elections 38 Town Clerk 39 Town Meeting & Referenda 39 Payments to Other Civil Divisions 39 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Administrative Services 42 Information Systems 43 Human Resources 44 Health Officer and Sanitarian 45 Community Development 45 TOWN OF STONINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS 2020-2021 ADOPTED BUDGET PAGE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT Assessor’s Office 51 Board of Assessment Appeals 51
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 6: SERVICES and INFRASTRUCTURE Introduction
    Chester 2009 Plan of Conservation and Development Page 6‐1 CHAPTER 6: SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Introduction Town services and infrastructure are the framework on which the community network operates, progresses, and interacts. Town services include governing boards and commissions, social services, recreational programs, education, public safety, and public works. Infrastructure incorporates tangible facilities that can be moved, expanded, modified, or removed. The library, town hall, community center, transportation, communications, parks, trails, water, sewer, fire stations, and schools are some of the significant facilities that enhance community character and quality of life. This Plan of Conservation and Development explores Chester’s services and infrastructure to provide recommendations to address future needs. To coordinate efficient and effective town planning, multiple services need to be supported by mutually shared infrastructure. A caveat in final recommendations within this section of the plan is the ability of the town to legally act within the context of enabling statutes outlined by the State of Connecticut. There are also policies and standards outlined by the state and federal government which the town follows in the context of receiving state funding or use of state property. Chester has significant acreage dedicated to state or regional ownership; parks, forest, regional watershed, and transportation. The town’s ability to coordinate future planning goals with infrastructure improvements in parks, roads, and utilities
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning Regulations of the Town of Stratford
    ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD With Amendments through September 1, 2015 REPRINTED FROM THE CODE OF STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD With Amendments through September 1, 2015 REPRINTED FROM THE CODE OF STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT TABLE OF CONTENTS STRATFORD ZONING REGULATIONS P R E F A C E ......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. ......................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2. DISTRICTS. ............................................................................................ 11 2.1 DIVISION IN DISTRICTS. ........................................................................................... 11 2.2 ZONING MAP. ........................................................................................................... 12 2.3 MORE RESTRICTIVE DISTRICTS. ............................................................................... 12 2.4 ZONING OF STREETS. ............................................................................................... 13 2.5 LAND UNDER WATER. .............................................................................................. 13 SECTION 3. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. ............................................................ 13 3.1 COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS. .......................................................................... 13 3.1.1. COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS. ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Pledge Ofallegiance Community Development Re
    AGENDA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY MARCH 22 2010 RESCHEDULED FROM MARCH 15 201 0 7 00 P M CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY HALL 45 LYON TERRACE BRIDGEPORT CONNECTICUT Prayer Pledge ofAllegiance Roll Call MINUTES FOR APPROVAL Approval of City Council Minutes February 16 2010 COMMUNICATIONS TO BE REFERRED TO COMMITTEES 39 09 8 Communication from Central Grants Community Development re Supplemental Information concerning Item 39 09 Program Year 36 Annual Action Plan CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA referred to Economic and Community Development and Environment Committee 44 09 Communication from OPED re Disposition of City Owned Properties by Auction Sale to Abutter or Bridgeport Housing Authority and request for Public Hearing Ordered concerning the same referred to Economic and Community Development and Environment Committee 45 09 Communication from Mayor re Proposed Five Year Capital Plan for fiscal years 2011 2015 referred to Budget and Appropriations Committee 46 09 Communication from OPED re Disposition of City Owned Property 751 Kossuth Street to The Boys and Girls Clubs of Bridgeport Inc BGC referred to Economic and Community Development and Environment Committee 47 09 Communication from OPED re Disposition of City Owned Properties to Habitat for Humanity referred to Economic and Community Development and Environment Committee Page 2 Agenda City Council Meeting March 15 2010 rescheduled to March 22 2010 Special Meeting COMMUNICATIONS TO BE REFERRED TO COMMITTEES CONTINUED Revitalization re of East Side 48 09 a Communication from Neighborhood
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory by Stakeholder Stakeholder ITS Element Status
    Inventory by Stakeholder Stakeholder ITS Element Status Amtrak Amtrak Customer Information System Existing Amtrak Emergency Response Vehicles Existing Amtrak Fare Management System Existing Amtrak Operations Center Existing Amtrak Police Dispatch Existing Amtrak Terminal Planned Amtrak Trains Existing Amtrak Website Existing Archive Data Users Archived Data Users Existing Bridgeport Port Authority Bridgeport Port Authority Planned Capitol Region TOC Capitol Region TOC Planned City of Bridgeport City of Bridgeport Parking Management System Planned City of Bridgeport Planning and Economic Planned Development City of Bridgeport Police Department- DELETE Planned City of Bridgeport Traffic Operations Center- DELETE Planned Greater Bridgeport PRESTO Planned Greater Bridgeport Transit VMS Planned City of Danbury City of Danbury CCTV Planned City of Hartford City of Hartford DMS Planned City of Hartford Event Committee Planned City of Hartford Website Planned City of Hartford Fire Department City of Hartford Fire Alarms and Signals Division Planned City of Hartford Fire Alarms and Signals Division Planned Maintenance Vehicles City of Hartford Fire Vehicles Planned City of Hartford Office of Emergency Management Hartford EOC Planned City of Hartford Police Department City of Hartford Police Vehicles Planned City of Hartford Public Safety Dispatch Planned City of Hartford Public Works Connecticut Statewide ITS Architecture Inventory by Stakeholder Page 1 of 9 Stakeholder ITS Element Status City of Harford Public Works RWIS Planned City of Hartford
    [Show full text]
  • Public Act 13-247
    House Bill No. 6706 Public Act No. 13-247 AN ACT IMPLEMENTING PROVISIONS OF THE STATE BUDGET FOR THE BIENNIUM ENDING JUNE 30, 2015 CONCERNING GENERAL GOVERNMENT. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: Section 1. (Effective July 1, 2013) The following sums are appropriated from the GENERAL FUND for the annual periods indicated for the purposes described. 2013-2014 2014-2015 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT Personal Services $47,745,867 $50,395,341 Other Expenses 16,130,406 17,168,117 Equipment 107,285 50,100 Flag Restoration 75,000 75,000 Interim Salary/Caucus Offices 605,086 495,478 Connecticut Academy of Science and 500,000 400,000 Engineering Old State House 555,950 581,500 Interstate Conference Fund 383,747 399,080 New England Board of Higher Education 192,938 202,584 Nonfunctional - Change to Accruals 309,233 295,053 AGENCY TOTAL 66,605,512 70,062,253 House Bill No. 6706 AUDITORS OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS Personal Services 11,287,145 11,860,523 Other Expenses 426,778 439,153 Equipment 10,000 10,000 Nonfunctional - Change to Accruals 68,686 69,637 AGENCY TOTAL 11,792,609 12,379,313 COMMISSION ON AGING Personal Services 395,673 417,627 Other Expenses 37,418 38,848 Nonfunctional - Change to Accruals 7,901 2,499 AGENCY TOTAL 440,992 458,974 PERMANENT COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN Personal Services 513,111 543,032 Other Expenses 78,834 57,117 Equipment 1,000 1,000 Nonfunctional - Change to Accruals 5,476 3,588 AGENCY TOTAL 598,421 604,737 COMMISSION ON CHILDREN Personal Services 630,416 670,356 Other Expenses 76,187 77,055 Nonfunctional - Change to Accruals 9,431 5,062 AGENCY TOTAL 716,034 752,473 LATINO AND PUERTO RICAN AFFAIRS COMMISSION Personal Services 400,430 419,433 Other Expenses 63,980 28,144 Nonfunctional - Change to Accruals 6,351 2,457 AGENCY TOTAL 470,761 450,034 Public Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Social and Economic Effects of the Connecticut Turnpike Annette M
    28 sistance of Ian R. Kingham, George E. Frangos, and Highway Research Record 399, 1973, pp. 12-26. Krieger W. Henderson, Jr., of the NCHRP staff is 13. P. L. Niebanck and J. B. Pope. The Elderly in gratefully acknowledged. Older Urban Areas: Problems of Adaptation and the Effects of Relocation. Univ. of Pennsylvania REFERENCES Press, Philadelphia, 1965. 14. G. Fellman. Implications for Planning Policy of 1. J. E. Burkhardt, N. K. Boyd, and T. K. Martin. Neighborhood Resistance to Urban Renewal and Residential Dislocation: Costs and Consequences. Highway Proposals. Urban Planning Research and RMC Research Corporation, Bethesda, MD, Dec. Demonstration Project, Brandeis University, 1976. Waltham, MA; Massachusetts Department of 2. F. P. Bosselman and others. New Approaches to Housing and Urban Development, Boston, 1969. Compensation for Residential Takings. NCHRP, 15. M. Fried and P. Gliecher. Some Sources of Report 107, 1970. Residential Satisfaction in an Urban Slum. Journal 3. A. Downs. Losses Imposed on Urban Households of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 27, by Uncompensated Highway and Renewal Costs. 1961, pp. 305-314. ill Urban Problems and Prospects, Chicago, Mark­ 16. L. Watts and others. The Middle-Income Negro ham Press, 1971. Family Faces Urban Renewal. Florence Hellen 4. F. I Michelman. Property, utility, and Fairness: Graduate School for Advanced Studies in Social Comments on the Ethical Foundation of "Just Welfare, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA; Compensation" Law. Harvard Law Review, Vol. Massachusetts Department of Commerce and De­ 80, April 1967, pp. 1165-1258. velopment, Boston, 1964. 5. J. M. Mogey. Social Effects of Eminent Domain. 17. C. W.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ESTUARY TRANSIT DISTRICT MIDDLETOWN TRANSIT DISTRICT SPECIAL ESTUARY TRANSIT DISTRICT EXPANSION TRANSITION COMMITTEE MEETING MAT Garage, 91 N
    ESTUARY TRANSIT DISTRICT MIDDLETOWN TRANSIT DISTRICT SPECIAL ESTUARY TRANSIT DISTRICT EXPANSION TRANSITION COMMITTEE MEETING MAT Garage, 91 N. Main Street, Middletown, CT with Remote Option July 19, 2021 at 11:00 AM AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Roll Call – S. Tyler III. MOA Discussion IV. Executive Session V. Discussion Topics 1. Discussion of Inter-District MOA 2. Discussion of Shared Staffing Agreement VI. Old Business VII. New Business VIII. Next Steps IX. Next Meeting – July 26, 2021 at MAT Garage, 91 N. Main Street, Middletown, CT at 11:00 AM with Remote Option. X. Adjournment Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88235115669?pwd=VHVoQ0x5N2h2c2xCQ0xiaUpjQVhFUT09 Meeting ID: 882 3511 5669 Passcode: 905273 Language Assistance is available. If you need assistance, please call Lisa at 860-510-0429 ext. 104 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Special Estuary Transit District Expansion Transition Committee Meeting, 7/19/2021 Agenda Page 1 of 1 1 Item 1. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT I – Parties The parties to this Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA” or “Agreement”) are the Estuary Transit District (aka Nine Town Transit, hereafter referred to as ETD) and the Middletown Transit District (aka Middletown Area Transit, hereafter referred to as MAT. The parties have discussed the substance of this Agreement with officials from the Connecticut Department of Transportation (hereafter referred to as CTDOT), and this Agreement is conditional upon support necessary from CTDOT as referenced in various sections. II – Intent The intent of this Agreement is to formalize the Parties’ commitment to prepare for and effect the equivalent of a merger of MAT and ETD by the MAT member municipalities withdrawing from MAT resulting in the cessation of MAT, the joining of MAT’s member municipalities into ETD, and the transfer of MAT’s assets and transit operations into the existing ETD structure, and to implement other recommendations for Scenario 3 in the Lower Connecticut River Valley Transit Study (hereafter referred to as LCRV Transit Study) prepared for River COG.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations of a Colonial New England Roadway Cecelia S
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 10 Article 1 1981 Investigations of a Colonial New England Roadway Cecelia S. Kirkorian Joseph D. Zeranski Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Kirkorian, Cecelia S. and Zeranski, Joseph D. (1981) "Investigations of a Colonial New England Roadway," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 10 10, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol10/iss1/1 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol10/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investigations of a Colonial New England Roadway Cover Page Footnote We gratefully acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Denise Trtolatis both in the field and for support throughout the project. The bulk density testing was conducted under the guidance of Dr. Harvey Luce and Mary Lou Peloetier, School of Agriculture, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. Bill Hollis and Ann Ross were kind enough to photographically record the site. Robert Weiner, Geography Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, C, was responsibile for the graphic reproductions. Funding for this project was provided in part by the Public Archaeology Survey Team, University of Cennecticut, Storrs, CT and the Archaeological Associates of greenwich, Greenwich, YMCA, owners of the site in 1979, this work would not have been possible. This article is available in Northeast Historical Archaeology: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol10/iss1/1 1 New England suggests a strong correlation Investigations of A between the predicted and observed network Colonial New England development.
    [Show full text]