DOCSLIB.ORG

Kansas Statewide Rail Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kansas Statewide Rail Plan Kansas Statewide Rail Plan Kansas Department of Transportation September 2017 i Kansas Rail Plan • Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Role of Rail in Kansas’ Multimodal System ..................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Kansas’ Goals for its Multimodal Transportation System .................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Kansas State Freight Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Kansas Long Range Transportation Plan, 2008-2030 ............................................................. 1-2 1.2.3 Kansas State Transportation Improvement Program, 2017-2020 .................................... 1-3 1.3 The Role of Rail within the Kansas Transportation System ................................................................ 1-4 1.3.1 The Early Years ......................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.2 The Current System Takes Shape ..................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.3 Evolution of Passenger Rail Services .............................................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Institutional Structure of Kansas’s State Rail Program ......................................................................... 1-6 1.4.1 State Planning Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4.2 Kansas Department of Transportation........................................................................................... 1-6 1.4.3 Other Public Sector Rail Planning in Kansas ................................................................................ 1-9 1.5 Federal Funding and Grants .......................................................................................................................... 1-11 1.5.1 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant ............. 1-11 1.5.2 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 ............................................. 1-12 1.6 State Authority to Grant Funding and Financing .................................................................................. 1-12 1.6.1 Legislative Authority ........................................................................................................................... 1-12 1.6.2 State Rail Funding in Kansas............................................................................................................ 1-13 1.6.3 State Provided Funding 2012-2016 ............................................................................................. 1-13 1.7 Summary of Freight and Passenger Rail Services, Initiatives and Plans .................................... 1-14 Chapter 2 Existing Kansas Rail System ................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Kansas’s Rail Network Description ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Class I Railroads ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 BNSF Railway ............................................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.2.2 Kansas City Southern ............................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.3 Norfolk Southern Railway.................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.4 Union Pacific Railroad ........................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.3 Class III Railroads ............................................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.1 Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad Co.................................................................................. 2-11 2.3.2 Blue Rapids Railroad ........................................................................................................................... 2-12 2.3.3 Boot Hill and Western Railway ....................................................................................................... 2-13 2.3.4 Cimarron Valley Railroad .................................................................................................................. 2-14 2.3.5 Garden City Western Railway, Inc. ................................................................................................ 2-15 2.3.6 Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad ...................................................................................................... 2-16 2.3.7 KYLE Railroad Company.................................................................................................................... 2-18 2.3.8 Missouri and Northern Arkansas Railroad ................................................................................ 2-20 2.3.9 Nebraska Kansas Colorado Railroad ............................................................................................ 2-20 2.3.10 South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad ...................................................................................... 2-21 2.3.11 V&S Railway LLC ................................................................................................................................ 2-23 2.3.12 Kansas City Terminal Railway Company ................................................................................. 2-24 2.3.13 New Century AirCenter Railroad ................................................................................................. 2-25 2.3.14 Wichita Terminal Association Railroad, Inc. .......................................................................... 2-26 2.4 Rail Freight Commodity Flows ..................................................................................................................... 2-28 ii Table of Contents • Kansas Rail Plan 2.4.1 Freight Demand and Growth ........................................................................................................... 2-28 2.4.2 Freight Forecast .................................................................................................................................... 2-29 2.5 Intercity Passenger Rail Network ................................................................................................................ 2-30 2.6 Passenger Stations in Kansas ........................................................................................................................ 2-33 2.6.1 Lawrence .................................................................................................................................................. 2-33 2.6.2 Topeka ....................................................................................................................................................... 2-35 2.6.3 Newton ...................................................................................................................................................... 2-36 2.6.4 Hutchinson .............................................................................................................................................. 2-37 2.6.5 Dodge City ................................................................................................................................................ 2-38 2.6.6 Garden City .............................................................................................................................................. 2-39 2.7 Recent-Year Improvements at Amtrak Stations ................................................................................... 2-40 2.8 Tourist Train Network ..................................................................................................................................... 2-40 2.9 Changes to the Rail Network ......................................................................................................................... 2-42 2.10 Intermodal ............................................................................................................................................................. 2-44 2.10.1 Intermodal Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 2-44 2.10.2 Transload Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 2-45 2.10.3 Major Yards and Facilities Freight Rail ..................................................................................... 2-46 2.11 Rail Safety and Security ................................................................................................................................... 2-49 2.11.1 Positive Train Control .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Fe Railway Collection – L.M
    Santa Fe Railway Collection – L.M. HURLEY MANUSCRIPTS L. M. (Mike) HURLEY MANUSCRIPTS COLLECTION The Hurley Manuscripts Collection contains paper materials collected by Mike Hurley. He filed the documents in categories in a four-drawer filing cabinet. The filing cabinet is located in the southwest portion of the Archives within the area dedicated to the various collections which comprise the Santa Fe Railway Collection. The numbering system is Hurley’s. The document categories are: Amtrak and busses; baggage checks; blotters/calendars; books; classification cards; Consists of trains; correspondence of Claude Cravens; Date Nail List; depots; Dispatcher’s Sheet; Engines; Engine 1880 (in Military Park in Newton, KS); Foreign Lines; Harvey House and Dining Cars; Cyrus K. Holliday; I.D. Cards; Line Up and Progies; Lt. Wt.; Magazines; Manuscripts (Inventory of Santa Fe Records at the KHS Topeka, KS); Maps; Mergers; Morse Code; Newton History; Northern Pacific; Oil Lamps; Orders-Train; Passenger Schedules; Passes-Train; Pay Roll; Poems (Railroad); Railroad History; R.P.O.; Research Data; Retirees; Roundhouse; RX. Tower Movement; Seniority Roster; Railroad Slang; Street Cars and A.V.I. Ry; Strike; Telegrams and Line Ups; Tickets; Time Service Department; Track Warrants; Trade Marks; Union Pacific #844 and “City of Wichita”; Water Tower; Work Train Reports; and, Wrecks. FILE DRAWER 5: A-E Amtrak and Busses 1. Amtrak Tickets 25 May 1989 2. Amtrak News Article Topeka Daily Capital-Journal May 12, 1985 321. “All Aboard for Amtrak’s 20th Birthday Rocky Mountain News April 30, 1991 332. “Trains, A Part of Dodge City History, Threaten to Fade Away” Dodge City Daily Globe February 9, 1979 342.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak's Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads
    Amtrak’s Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads September 21, 2017 Jim Blair –Director Host Railroads Today’s Amtrak System 2| Amtrak Amtrak’s Services • Northeast Corridor (NEC) • 457 miles • Washington‐New York‐Boston Northeast Corridor • 11.9 million riders in FY16 • Long Distance (LD) services • 15 routes • Up to 2,438 miles in length Long • 4.65 million riders in FY16 Distance • State‐supported trains • 29 routes • 19 partner states • Up to 750 miles in length State- • 14.7 million riders in FY16 supported3| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads Amtrak Route System Track Ownership Excluding Terminal Railroads VANCOUVER SEATTLE Spokane ! MONTREAL PORTLAND ST. PAUL / MINNEAPOLIS Operated ! St. Albans by VIA Rail NECR MDOT TORONTO VTR Rutland ! Port Huron Niagara Falls ! Brunswick Grand Rapids ! ! ! Pan Am MILWAUKEE ! Pontiac Hoffmans Metra Albany ! BOSTON ! CHICAGO ! Springfield Conrail Metro- ! CLEVELAND MBTA SALT LAKE CITY North PITTSBURGH ! ! NEW YORK ! INDIANAPOLIS Harrisburg ! KANSAS CITY ! PHILADELPHIA DENVER ! ! BALTIMORE SACRAMENTO Charlottesville WASHINGTON ST. LOUIS ! Richmond OAKLAND ! Petersburg ! Buckingham ! Newport News Norfolk NMRX Branch ! Oklahoma City ! Bakersfield ! MEMPHIS SCRRA ALBUQUERQUE ! ! LOS ANGELES ATLANTA SCRRA / BNSF / SDN DALLAS ! FT. WORTH SAN DIEGO HOUSTON ! JACKSONVILLE ! NEW ORLEANS SAN ANTONIO Railroads TAMPA! Amtrak (incl. Leased) Norfolk Southern FDOT ! MIAMI Union Pacific Canadian Pacific BNSF Canadian National CSXT Other Railroads 4| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads ! MONTREAL Amtrak NEC Route System
    [Show full text]
  • 0580 W06 Qp 2
    UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education MATHEMATICS *058002* Paper 2 (Extended) 0580/02 0581/02 Candidates answer on the Question Paper. Additional Materials: Electronic calculator Geometrical instruments October/November 2006 Mathematical tables (optional) Tracing paper (optional) 1hour 30 minutes Candidate Name Centre Candidate Number Number READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST Write your Centre number, candidate number and name on all the work you hand in. Write in dark blue or black pen in the spaces provided on the Question Paper. You may use a pencil for any diagrams or graphs. Do not use staples, paper clips, highlighters, glue or correction fluid. DO NOT WRITE IN THE BARCODE. DO NOT WRITE IN THE GREY AREAS BETWEEN THE PAGES. Answer all questions. If working is needed for any question it must be shown below that question. Electronic calculators should be used. If the degree of accuracy is not specified in the question, and if the answer is For Examiner's Use not exact, give the answer to three significant figures. Given answers in degrees to one decimal place. For π , use either your calculator value or 3.142. The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question. The total number of marks for this paper is 70. This document consists of 11 printed pages and 1 blank page. IB06 11_0580_02/5RP UCLES 2006 [Turn over 2 c d c d 1 Two quantities and are connected by the formula = 2 + 30. For Find c when d = −100. Examiner's Use Answer [1] 2 5 x + = .
    [Show full text]
  • Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ August 2017 Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D. Lisa Shofstall Kansas State University Transportation Center 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) August 2017 Railcar Operational Status in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D., Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D., Lisa Shofstall No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Transportation Center Department of Civil Engineering 11 Contract or Grant No. 2109 Fiedler Hall C2069 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren October 2015–December 2016 Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0691-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The rail industry’s recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III/short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition, they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • Super Chief – El Capitan See Page 4 for Details
    AUGUST- lyerlyer SEPTEMBER 2020 Ready for Boarding! Late 1960s Combined Super Chief – El Capitan see page 4 for details FLYER SALE ENDS 9-30-20 Find a Hobby Shop Near You! Visit walthers.com or call 1-800-487-2467 WELCOME CONTENTS Chill out with cool new products, great deals and WalthersProto Super Chief/El Capitan Pages 4-7 Rolling Along & everything you need for summer projects in this issue! Walthers Flyer First Products Pages 8-10 With two great trains in one, reserve your Late 1960s New from Walthers Pages 11-17 Going Strong! combined Super Chief/El Capitan today! Our next HO National Model Railroad Build-Off Pages 18 & 19 Railroads have a long-standing tradition of getting every last WalthersProto® name train features an authentic mix of mile out of their rolling stock and engines. While railfans of Santa Fe Hi-Level and conventional cars - including a New From Our Partners Pages 20 & 21 the 1960s were looking for the newest second-generation brand-new model, new F7s and more! Perfect for The Bargain Depot Pages 22 & 23 diesels and admiring ever-bigger, more specialized freight operation or collection, complete details start on page 4. Walthers 2021 Reference Book Page 24 cars, a lot of older equipment kept rolling right along. A feature of lumber traffic from the 1960s to early 2000s, HO Scale Pages 25-33, 36-51 Work-a-day locals and wayfreights were no less colorful, the next run of WalthersProto 56' Thrall All-Door Boxcars N Scale Pages 52-57 with a mix of earlier engines and equipment that had are loaded with detail! Check out these layout-ready HO recently been repainted and rebuilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Equipment Roster
    Location 3400 NE Grand Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73111 (405) 424-8222 Conveniently located just a half mile west of Interstate 35 off Exit 131 (NE 36th Street), on historic Grand Boulevard. - Half-mile east of Martin Luther King Boulevard - Just south of Lincoln Park Golf Course - 1 mile south of the Oklahoma City Zoo Oklahoma Railway Museum 3400 NE Grand Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73111 (405) 424-8222 www.oklahomarailwaymuseum.org EQUIPMENT ROSTER 40 1 Oklahoma Railway Museum The Oklahoma Railway Museum, Ltd. Bridge Logos (ORM) offers 35-minute excursion trains on the first and third Saturdays of each month for the public from 10 am until 4 pm starting the first Saturday in April. The trains leave the historic Oakwood Depot at 9:15, 11:15, 1:15 and 3:15 The Museum itself is open Thursday - Saturday from 9 am to 4 pm and there is no admission charge to tour the grounds. Train rides are free for children under the age of 3, $5 for children 3 years to 12 years, and These Frisco and Rock Island Railroad $12 for those 13 years and older. In heralds were displayed for almost 80 years addition to the train ride, railroad (1931-2010) on Oklahoma City’s South equipment, including motor cars, Robinson Street Bridge. The bridge was locomotives and passenger cars, are on located approximately a half mile east of display. A display car contains permanent Union Station and allowed both railroads to exhibits of railroad memorabilia. pass above Robinson to access to the station. The bridge was torn down to make Oakwood Station way for a new bridge with the rerouting of the I-40 crosstown expressway.
    [Show full text]
  • The ESPA EXPRESS NEWS from the EMPIRE STATE PASSENGERS ASSOCIATION
    The ESPA EXPRESS NEWS FROM THE EMPIRE STATE PASSENGERS ASSOCIATION http://www.esparail.org WORKING FOR A MORE BALANCED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Vol. 35 No. 6 November/December 2011 Amtrak to Lease 85 Miles of Empire possibly changing the Lake Shore Limited schedule by departing Corridor from CSX Chicago 3 hours earlier and also departing New York about an hour earlier. One improvement considered would extend the In an extremely welcomed announcement, it was confirmed hours of the Diner to encourage more purchases, and to make on October 18 that Amtrak intends to enter into a long-term the Diner cashless (Debit/Credit cards only), which would save lease with CSX to gain full operational control of the 85 route time counting and tracking cash. Forty seven percent of the miles of the Empire Corridor between Control Point 75 north Diner guests are coach passengers, which is very high compared of Poughkeepsie (the north end of Metro-North territory) and to other Amtrak routes. Upgrading the food in the lounge car CP 160 at the Schenectady station. Amtrak already controls the also will be considered. Of interest in the report was that 62% 9 mile segment west of Schenectady to Hoffmans at CP 169 of the Lake Shore’s passengers are female and that 61% of where the CSX freight line from Selkirk Yard joins the main passengers are traveling alone. The top three city pairs on the line heading west. CSX will retain full freight rights on the Lake Shore Limited are: New York-Chicago, Buffalo-Chicago, leased line. and Syracuse-Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • Montreal, Quebec City & Canadian Maritimes
    Tour Highlights Montreal, Quebec City & Canadian Maritimes AUGUST 6 - 16, 2020 Departure Point: Subject to Change with host TIM SEAMAN, Sioux City - KCAU TV 5993 Gordon Dr. KCAU 9 News Anchor Transportation provided to/from Eppley AirField Airport. Peggy's Cove DAY 7: CAPE BRETON ISLAND YOUR EXPERIENCE INCLUDES We depart Prince Edward Island by • All airfare, taxes & fuel surcharges ferry to Nova Scotia. Upon arrival • Guaranteed prices & low deposit in the city of Baddeck, take a tour • Holiday Vacations Tour Director through the life of its most famous • Expert local guides resident at the Alexander Graham • Motorcoach & professional driver Bell National Historic Site. The exhibits • Rail transportation showcase Bell’s many accomplish- • Baggage handling at hotels ments and inventions including the • $100 travel voucher for a future tour telephone. We check-in to our Baddeck 13 Excellent Meals Featuring accommodations for two nights. L,D • KCAU 9 Welcome Dinner at Érablière le TIM SEAMAN Chemin du Roy sugar shack THE CABOT TRAIL Tim Seaman celebrated 31 years at DAY 8: • Lunch at Fairmont Le Château Frontenac Today we travel along one of North KCAU in 2019. He became Sports • Dinner at Manoir Montmorency America’s most scenic roadways, Director in 1989. In 2012 he was • Farewell Lobster Dinner at Sou'Wester The Cabot Trail. On the way we pass promoted to news co-anchor, and in Peggy's Cove through Cape Breton Highlands currently shares the news desk with National Park, whose unspoiled B=Breakfast L=Lunch D=Dinner Bridget Bennett. natural beauty sets the stage for All Accommodations Featuring At the University of Northern Iowa, dramatic landscapes and incredible • at the Novotel Montreal Centre Tim received a Bachelor of Arts in Montreal, Quebec City & Canadian Maritimes coastal vistas.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Thanniv Ersary
    Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Railroad Retirement Board
    FOM1 315 315.1 Supplemental Annuity Background 315.1.1 General In 1966 the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) began paying supplemental annuities, in addition to regular age and service annuities, to railroad employees who met certain criteria. At that time, eligibility for the supplemental annuity was limited to those employees who were age 65 or older with 25 or more years of railroad service and who were first awarded regular retirement annuities after June 30, 1966. The Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (RRA) extended supplemental annuity eligibility to those employees who were age 60 or older with 30 or more years of service and who were first awarded regular age and service annuities after June 30, 1974. The 1981 Amendments to the RRA began phasing out the supplemental annuity by adding the requirement that the employee must have at least one month of creditable railroad service before October 1, 1981 to be eligible for the supplemental annuity. Therefore, a supplemental annuity is not payable to an employee who does not have at least one month of service before October 1, 1981, even if they meet all other age and service requirements. 315.1.2 Earliest Supplemental Annuity Eligibility Dates Under 1937 and 1974 Acts A. Earliest Eligibility Dates The date an age and service annuity or disability annuity is awarded is the voucher date of the award, i.e., the date the award is processed for payment. Beginning in 1966, the employee’s age and service annuity had to be vouchered after June 1966 for them to be eligible for a supplemental annuity at age 65 with at least 25 years of service.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVE X TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS HOCKEY STICK SOCIAL CONTEST OFFICIAL CONTEST RULES and REGULATIONS (“Official Rules”)
    LIVE x TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS HOCKEY STICK SOCIAL CONTEST OFFICIAL CONTEST RULES AND REGULATIONS (“Official Rules”) NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. A PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. THIS CONTEST IS SUBJECT TO ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, PROVINCIAL AND MUNICIPAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND IS VOID WHERE PROHIBITED BY LAW. PARTICIPATION IN THIS CONTEST CONSTITUTES FULL AND UNCONDITIONAL AGREEMENT WITH AND ACCEPTANCE OF THESE OFFICIAL RULES. (1) CONTEST PERIOD: The LIVE x TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS Social Contest (the “Contest”) begins at 9:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, February 15, 2018 and ends at 12:00 p.m. ET on Friday, February 23, 2018 (the “Contest Period”). (2) ELIGIBILITY: The Contest is only open to legal residents of Ontario who are eighteen (18) years of age or older at the time of entry (each an “Entrant”). Employees and the immediate families (including those with whom they are domiciled) of Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Partnership, by its managing partner, Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd. ("MLSE” or “Contest Sponsor”), Twitter Inc., Instagram and each of their respective subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, governors, agents, their advertising and promotional agencies (altogether the “Released Parties”) are not eligible to enter the Contest. For purposes of this Contest, “immediate family members” shall include the mother, father, brothers, sisters, daughters, sons, partner or spouse of an individual (regardless of where any such “immediate family member” resides). (3) HOW TO ENTER: NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. To enter the Contest, each Entrant must: (a) be an authorized account holder of Twitter or Instagram; (b) be a follower of @MLSELIVE on Twitter or Instagram; (c) find the Toronto Maple Leafs-related Contest post on @MLSELIVE during the Contest Period (each, a “Contest Tweet or post”); and (d) retweet the Contest Tweet(s) during the Contest Period or tag one (1) friend in the Comment section of the Contest post(s) (resulting in an “Entry” or, collectively, “Entries”).
    [Show full text]
  • OPINION REVENUE; SATISH UPADHYAY, in His Official Capacity As Acting Director of the Oregon Department of Revenue, Defendants-Appellants
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a No. 19-35184 Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-01716-JE v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF OPINION REVENUE; SATISH UPADHYAY, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Oregon Department of Revenue, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 15, 2020 Portland, Oregon Filed July 8, 2020 Before: Jay S. Bybee and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges, and Vince Chhabria,* District Judge. * The Honorable Vince Chhabria, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. 2 BNSF RAILWAY V. OREGON DEP’T OF REVENUE Opinion by Judge VanDyke; Concurrence by Judge Chhabria SUMMARY** Rail Carriers The panel affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of BNSF Railway Co., a rail carrier that challenged the Oregon Department of Revenue’s imposition of a tax on its intangible personal property, such as accounting goodwill. Agreeing with other circuits, the panel held that BNSF could challenge the property tax under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act, known as the 4- R Act, which prohibits taxes that discriminate against rail carriers. The panel rejected the argument that tax was generally applicable and that BNSF’s challenge was no more than a demand for exemptions offered to other taxpayers. The panel held that the proper comparison class for BNSF was Oregon’s commercial and industrial taxpayers, and the intangible personal property tax assessment discriminated against BNSF in violation of the 4-R Act, 49 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]