DOCSLIB.ORG

Milnesdickonjohn2000mahist.Pdf (11.58Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milnesdickonjohn2000mahist.Pdf (11.58Mb) THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY PROTECTION OF AUTHOR ’S COPYRIGHT This copy has been supplied by the Library of the University of Otago on the understanding that the following conditions will be observed: 1. To comply with s56 of the Copyright Act 1994 [NZ], this thesis copy must only be used for the purposes of research or private study. 2. The author's permission must be obtained before any material in the thesis is reproduced, unless such reproduction falls within the fair dealing guidelines of the Copyright Act 1994. Due acknowledgement must be made to the author in any citation. 3. No further copies may be made without the permission of the Librarian of the University of Otago. August 2010 IMPERIAL SOLDIERS? THE NEW ZEALAND MOUNTED RIFLES BRIGADE IN SINAI AND PALESTINE 1916-1919 D. JOHN MILNES A thesis submitted for the degree of Masters of Arts in History at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 1999. ll Abstract New Zealanders served in large numbers in three campaigns during the Great War of 1914-1918. Much has been written by historians, both past and present, about the experiences of the soldiers in two of these campaigns: Gallipoli and the Western Front. The third of these campaigns, Sinai and Palestine, is perhaps the least well known of New Zealand's Great War war efforts, but probably the most successful. This thesis is an investigation of how Imperial the New Zealanders who served in the Mounted Rifles brigade were. By this it 1s meant; were the soldiers characteristic of the British Empire, its institutions, and its ethos? Or were they different, reflecting distinctly New Zealand ideals and institutions? Central to this investigation were the views and opinions held by the New Zealand soldiers who served in the Mounted Rifles brigade in Sinai and Palestine from 1916-1919 regarding the British Empire. Several areas have been identified to provide the necessary information - how the soldiers fought in Sinai-Palestine, what they thought of different cultures and ethnicities, their opinion of the British Empire, their pastimes, and the soldier myth of New Zealand and its origins. In each of these areas, comparisons have been drawn with other Imperial formations in the theatre, notably units from the United Kingdom and Australia. These five key areas have provided clear answers to the question of how Imperial the soldiers were. It is demonstrable from the evidence presented and conclusions reached that the soldiers of the Mounted Rifles were Imperial soldiers, shaped and reflecting the institutions and ethos of the British Empire. They thought and acted similarly to the English and Australian soldiers in almost all areas examined. Where evidence could be found about other British Empire formations, such as the Sikhs and the British West Indians, it is also evident that the New Zealanders acted similarly to them. In their conscious thoughts and actions, it is evident that the Mounted Rifles acted in accordance with many of the British Empire's institutions and its ethos, once more indicating an Imperial connection. Some areas investigated, such as the New Zealand soldier mythology, upheld as distinctly New Zealand, have been demonstrated to be linked to an Empire wide colonial mythology, evolved from an English root, and owing itself to New Zealand's participation in the British Empire. The Imperial mentality of the Mounted Rifles was present in almost everything they did, and it seems certain that they were characteristic of the British Empire. ili P .. .· ,.•, \1}.:. ···.ft.·,.,· :..D ..··. ·Ae;g·.·.· ... ·..· ..· .. ·.... A. .•·'-''· ~k· ·•· : ;; ..o· ·i~I·rl. ..,,.-·t~U· ·: ··.~.··..II.-~If:.E·t,~. ·.~;a·" '·f..~:~.···.'···:: . As with any thesis, there are many people who deserve to be thanked, from the long suffering supervisor who marks the work to the bum who provided the impetus for a serendipitous discovery. Few deserve more praise than my supervisor for two thirds of this project, Tom Brooking. His ability to read and write comments is truly without compare. Sometimes it was hours, other times it was days. But always the work was accepted and returned with a smile. My other "supervisors", people from the History Department who helped me, need praise too: Roberto Rabel, Aaron Fox, and Alex Trapeznik fall neatly into this list. The many people from various research institutions around the country must be mentioned, including David of the Hocken Library, Windsor Jones from the W aiouru Army Museum, Greta from Otago University's Central Library, John Crawford from the New Zealand Defence Library, and the staff from the Alexander Turnbull Library and Wellington's National Archives. The history post grads must also be listed. Big Richard Kay, Shaun Broadley alias Broaders, and Paerau Warbrick alias Andrew Anderson alias Paerau W arbrick, for discussing ideas with, Marion Horan, for providing an outlet for frustration, and Maureen, Suzannah, Megan, and James for contributing to the hours of procrastination. Many people provided beds around the country, without which I would not have been able to complete the research. My sister Catherine Jane and her husband Greg must be top of the list here. My good friend Richard Lang provided the odd mattress or two, and my parents made available my old room (at no extra charge) for me when in Auckland. There are also my friends outside the History Department who should be mentioned. Ange, Mark, Mike, Callum, Rosalie, Nicie, Angela, Simon, Hugh, Amanda, and Lisa all provided a sympathetic ear to my moans, and a reason to procrastinate when there was no alternative but work. Last, but not least, there is my wife Paulette, who more than anyone else, made sure that this thesis was finished, and not abandoned half completed. To all of these people, and those who time and space would not permit a mention, thank you for all your help. iv Abstract 11 Acknowledgments iii Table of Contents iv List of Illustrations v Maps vi Glossary/Abbreviations vii Introduction 1 Chapter One 8 Chapter Two 35 Chapter Three 65 Chapter Four 85 Chapter Five 107 Conclusion 130 Bibliography 134 Appendix I 142 Appendix II 143 Appendix III 144 Appendix IV 145 v - . ' LiSt ~,f ltfiUStratiDBI Figure 1: Generals Edward Chaytor, Harry Chauvel, Chetwode 32 Figure 2: A section of the Auckland Mounted Rifles. 33 Figure 3: Australian Light Horse men watering their horses. 34 Figure 4: Sketch of an Arab street urchin. 61 Figure 5: Rural scenes of Arab Palestine. 62 Figure 6: Rural and urban Arabs. 63 Figure 7: Backsheesh. 64 Figure 8: Sporting pastimes of the New Zealand Mounted Rifles. 103 Figures 9 and 10: Sight seeing in Jerusalem. 104-06 Figure 11: Shopping in Jerusalem. 106 vi . ·.. " "'' .,, .M ·Ujf'i.:J•O·J······.·.··.,····~.··.· Map 1: Outline map of Northern Sinai 147 Map 2: Outline map of Palestine 148 Map 3: Outline map of Syria 149 Vll :G·.····. .. ·> ·.··• ······1··.· ... ·n.···c;:t•.·.··s·· u·t..:J·.··... g·JL.••·•··q·.; •• ~~•.·y·.·. ... ·...··/·.····.·.·.· ..··· ... · ,- - - Abb:te,viatioros A.I.F. Australian Imperial Force. A.L.H. Australian Light Horse. A.M.D. Anzac Mounted Division. A.M.R. Auckland Mounted Rifles regiment. C.M.R. Canterbury Mounted Rifles regiment. E.E.F. Egyptian Expeditionary Force. I.C.C. Imperial Camel Corps. N.Z.E.F. New Zealand Expeditionary Force. N.Z.M.G.S. New Zealand Machine Gun Squadron. N.Z.M.R. New Zealand Mounted Rifles brigade. N.Z.T.A. New Zealand Territorial Army. O.M.R. Otago Mounted Rifles. W.M.R. Wellington Mounted Rifles regiment. Yeomanry English Territorial Yeomanry Cavalry. Yilderim Collective term for the Turkish-German army forces in the Middle East. In October 1918, the Ottoman Empire spectacularly self destructed. At the Battle of Meggidio, two Turkish armies were destroyed by the Egyptian Expeditionary Force's advance along the plains. A third Turkish army surrendered at Amman. The destruction of these armies brought an end to the Sinai-Palestine campaign, and the surrender of the Ottoman Empire to the Allied and Associated powers. The successful conclusion of the campaign had come about through three years of constant fighting, starting in early 1916. In January 1916, the main British war effort against the Ottoman Empire had switched theatres from the Dardanelles campaign to the creation of a new army, the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, based in Egypt and tasked with protecting the Suez canal against Turkish attack. The New Zealand Mounted Rifles brigade were an important part of the E.E.F. from its very beginning. The N.Z.M.R., roughly 2,000 New Zealanders and 150 Englishmen, was grouped with three Australian Light Horse brigades to form the Anzac Mounted Division.1 The brigade fought in nearly every major battle, action, and raid during the campaign, and was instrumental in many of the early British victories in Sinai. Once the brigade entered Palestine, it continued to perform vital and important work as part of the spearhead of British forces. From 1916-1919, over 4,500 New Zealand men passed through the brigade, and casualties numbered approximately 400 dead and 1,200 wounded.2 When the reinforcements are added to the number already in the brigade, around 6,500 men served in the N.Z.M.R. during the campaign, about six per cent of all New Zealand men sent abroad to fight during the Great War. New Zealanders also served in one of the most picturesque of the Great War's formations, the Imperial Camel Corps. This unit existed from 1916 to late 1918, and included two New Zealand companies, the 15th and 16th. Each company was approximately 175 officers and men. The 15th and 16th companies were part of the 4th brigade, I. C. C. and were companions of the N.Z.M.R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 100 YEAR COMMEMORATION of the GALLIPOLI CAMPAIGN Go To
    HOME / FRONT 100 YEAR COMMEMORATION OF THE GALLIPOLI CAMPAIGN Go to www.penrithregionalgallery.org to download a copy of this Digital Catalogue HOME / FRONT INTRODUCTION The 100 year anniversary of the 25 April 1915 landing As the basis for her drawings, the artist researched and commencement of battle at ANZAC Cove, Gallipoli, and chose historical photographs from the collection of presents a very special opportunity for Australians to reflect the Australian War Memorial. Additional research saw upon conflict, sacrifice and service across the intervening O’Donnell travel to Turkey in March of 2014 to meet with years. historians, visit war museums ,ANZAC battle sites and to survey the terrain and imagine herself and others upon the As a public gallery, concerned to present exhibitions peninsula’s rocky landscape of hell in1915. Imagining what relevant to its community, Penrith Regional Gallery & happened to Australian countrymen and women so far from The Lewers Bequest was keen to make a meaningful home, fighting Turkish soldiers in defence of their homeland contribution to this anniversary. Albeit, so much had been as a consequence of old world geopolitical arrangements, said and written of the Campaign, of its failures, of the old was a difficult and melancholic task. men who led from a safe distance, and of the bravery of the young who fought, the question hovered - “What was left to As the artist walked the scarred earth she found scattered say?” relics of war - pieces of spent shrapnel, fragments of barbed wire, bone protruding from the earth, trenches, now After much consideration we have chosen to devote our worn and gentle furrows, the rusting, hulking, detritus of the Main Gallery Autumn exhibition to an examination of the world’s first modern war.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2017
    MONUMENTALLY SPEAKING National Boer War Memorial Association Newsletter for NSW, SA, WA and ACT Artist’s impression NUMBER 30 – FEBRUARY 2017 NATIONAL BOER WAR MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION National Patron: Chief of the Defence Force, Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin AC NSW Committee of NBWMA Inc – Chairman: David Deasey NSW Chairman’s Message involvement that has led to the Memorial Welcome to 2017. We stand at the brink project. We also take a look at the full of our most exciting period of time as design and show some of the technical we head toward the dedication of the intricacies behind the sculptures. Finally memorial, 31 May 2017 at 11am. All of our we have some fascinating stories of supporters and interested members of soldiers and equipment from the war the public are invited to attend this great This has been a great endeavour which occasion. The Organising Committee has spanned 15 years at this point. We hopes to have TV screens in place so that have set the target of funds to be raised all attendees can see where ever they are in this financial year at $100.000. As at placed. Seating will be limited compared December 2016 approximately $35.000 to the numbers likely to attend and had been raised, (over $20.000 from NSW) formal invitations for this seating will be leaving $65.000 still short of the target. issued shortly. Please don’t let that stop This issue will be just about our last you from coming, everyone is welcome. chance of getting those funds in. So Inside this issue we look at the please – if you are thinking of donating – circumstances behind Australia’s Boer War please do it now.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Spring Creek
    Marlboroughtown Marshlands Rapaura Ravenscliff Spring Creek Tuamarina Waikakaho Wairau Bar Wairau Pa Marlboroughtown (1878- 1923) Spring Creek (1923-) Pre 1878 1873 4th June 1873 Marlborough Provincial Council meeting included: This morning petitions were presented by Mr Dodson in favour of a vote for. Marlboroughtown School; from 15 ratepayers, against the annexation of a portion of the County of Wairau to the Borough of Blenheim another vote of £100 for a Library and Public Room in Havelock was carried. Mr Dodson moved for a vote of £50 for the School in Marlboroughtown, but a vigorous discussion arose upon it regarding Educational finance, in which Mr Seymour announced that Government would not consent to the various items for school buildings, and upon the particular subject being put to the vote it was lost. 11th June 1873 The following petition, signed by fourteen persons, was presented .to the Provincial Council by Mr George Dodson; To his Honor the Superintendent and Provincial Council of Marlborough, in Council assembled We, the undersigned residents of Spring Creek and Marlboroughtown, do humbly beg that your Honorable Council will take into consideration this our humble petition. That we have for some years felt the necessity of establishing a school in our district, and having done so we now find a great difficulty in providing the necessary funds for its maintenance, and we do humbly pray that your Honorable Council will grant such assistance as will enable us to carry on the school successfully, as without your assistance the school must lapse, We have a Teacher engaged at a salary of Fifty (50) Pounds per annum, and since the commencement of the school the attendance has been steadily increasing showing at the present time a daily average of twenty (20) children.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of 119 Infantry Brigade in the Great War with Special Reference To
    The History of 119 Infantry Brigade in the Great War with Special Reference to the Command of Brigadier-General Frank Percy Crozier by Michael Anthony Taylor A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract 119 Brigade, 40th Division, had an unusual origin as a ‘left-over’ brigade of the Welsh Army Corps and was the only completely bantam formation outside 35th Division. This study investigates the formation’s national identity and demonstrates that it was indeed strongly ‘Welsh’ in more than name until 1918. New data on the social background of men and officers is added to that generated by earlier studies. The examination of the brigade’s actions on the Western Front challenges the widely held belief that there was an inherent problem with this and other bantam formations. The original make-up of the brigade is compared with its later forms when new and less efficient units were introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Army Officer Corps, 1909-1945
    1 A New Zealand Style of Military Leadership? Battalion and Regimental Combat Officers of the New Zealand Expeditionary Forces of the First and Second World Wars A thesis provided in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Wayne Stack 2014 2 Abstract This thesis examines the origins, selection process, training, promotion and general performance, at battalion and regimental level, of combat officers of the New Zealand Expeditionary Forces of the First and Second World Wars. These were easily the greatest armed conflicts in the country’s history. Through a prosopographical analysis of data obtained from personnel records and established databases, along with evidence from diaries, letters, biographies and interviews, comparisons are made not only between the experiences of those New Zealand officers who served in the Great War and those who served in the Second World War, but also with the officers of other British Empire forces. During both wars New Zealand soldiers were generally led by competent and capable combat officers at all levels of command, from leading a platoon or troop through to command of a whole battalion or regiment. What makes this so remarkable was that the majority of these officers were citizen-soldiers who had mostly volunteered or had been conscripted to serve overseas. With only limited training before embarking for war, most of them became efficient and effective combat leaders through experiencing battle. Not all reached the required standard and those who did not were replaced to ensure a high level of performance was maintained within the combat units.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Forces in the British Army
    From the page: The Long, Long Trail The British Army in the Great War of 1914-1918 South African forces in the British Army In 1902, just twelve years before Great Britain declared war, the armies of Britain and the Boer Republics (Transvaal and Orange Free State) had been fighting each other in the Second Boer War. There had been an extraordinary transformation in relationships between the countries in the intervening period and the Union of South Africa was to prove a staunch and hard-fighting Ally. Here is a summary of their story: South Africa enters the war on British side; some Boer conservatives rebel In August 1914 Louis Botha and Jan Smuts took the Union of South Africa into the war in support of Great Britain. Louis Botha, former member of the Transvaal Volksraad and an accomplished leader of Boer forces against the British in 1899-1902 had been elected the first President of the Union of South Africa in 1910. Jan Christian Smuts, another former Boer military leader, was his Minister of Defence. Both men had worked for increased harmony between South Africa and Britain since the end of the war in 1902. They now considered that South Africa, as a British dominion, must support the British side. They quickly ordered troops into German protectorate of South-West Africa. Many Afrikaners opposed going to war with Germany, which had aided them during the war against Britain (and continued a quiet propaganda war ever since). An attempted Boer coup against Botha's government failed in September 1914 when Christiaan Beyer - an Afrikaner hero from the earlier war - was killed by police, and a large armed uprising in the Orange Free State and the Transvaal later in the year was also held.
    [Show full text]
  • Thelast Charge
    The Last Charge An exhibition at the Buckinghamshire County Museum, Church Street, Aylesbury, HP20 2QP to commemorate the centenary of the last great British cavalry charges at El Mughar, Palestine on 13 November 1917. 31 October 2017 – 5 January 2018 Buckinghamshire Military Museum Trust www.bmmt.co.uk Buckinghamshire County Museum www.buckscountymuseum.org The Buckinghamshire Military Museum Trust gratefully acknowledges the support of the following without which this exhibition could not have been held: The Last Charge Buckinghamshire County Museum The charge of the 6th Mounted Brigade at El Mughar in Palestine on 13 November 1917 can claim to be the last great British cavalry charge although Lord Parmoor there were later charges in Syria in 1918 by an Indian regiment and by the The Crown Commissioners and BNP Paribas Australian Light Horse. The Institute of Directors Significantly, James Prinsep Beadle was commissioned to paint the charge at El Mughar as the cavalry contribution to a representative collection of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild and the Rothschild Archive Great War studies for the United Services Club in Pall Mall. Never previously The Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies exhibited outside of the building, which now houses the Institute of Directors, Beadle’s painting depicts ‘B’ Squadron of the 1/1st Royal Bucks The Buckingham Heritage Trust Hussars leading the charge against the Ottoman Turkish defenders. The regiment was commanded by Lieutenant Colonel the Hon. Fred Cripps, later The National Army Museum Lord Parmoor. The charge, which also featured the 1/1st Dorset Yeomanry The Berkshire Yeomanry Museum Trust with the 1/1st Berkshire Yeomanry in support, was described by General Sir George Barrow as ‘a complete answer to the critics of the mounted arm’.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SOLLUM EXPEDITION Egypt Was Threatened During the War Not Only by Turks from the East, but by Arabs from the West
    APPENDIX No. I. THE SOLLUM EXPEDITION Egypt was threatened during the war not only by Turks from the east, but by Arabs from the west. The Arabs of the Libyan Desert -under the religious dominance of Sheikh el Senussi, Sayed Ahmedl -had been at war with the Italians since they turned the Turks out of Tripoli before the Great War; and, although the Senussi himself was not altogether unfriendly to Great Britain, the position became highly complicated when Italy joined the Allies. Some of the former Turkish officers had remained in the desert, and others-together with Germans-had since been put ashore by submarines. These* sought every opportunity of embroiling the Senussi with England, and, although Sir John Maxwell treated him with almost limitless patience, in November 1915 there occurred events which made war inevitable. The western boundary of Egypt lay some 300 miles west of the Nile, but civil admillistration by the Egyptian Government was at this stage confined to a few stations along the Mediterranean coast M€D/TERRANEAN SPA and to the nearer oases. On the coast were garrisons,,,chiefly of Egyptia; coastguard, at El Dabaa-the head of the Khedivial railway (85 miles from Alexandria)-Mersa Matruh (160 miles), Sidi el Barrani (230), and Sollum (280). There were also a few minor posts. Arab troops, however, trained by Ja'far Pasha, an able Arab who had arrived from Constantinople in April, were concentrated in a threatening manner near some of these positions; and when, early in November, the British armed steamer Tara and horse-transport Moorinas were sunk by submarines in the Mediterranean and the survivors (95 Europeans and about 40 Indians) were handed over to the Senussi, who refused to release them, General Maxwell took immediate steps to meet the menace.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Corporal Robert Stanley Morgan (Regimental Number
    Corporal Robert Stanley Morgan (Regimental Number 719) lies in Solferino Farm Cemetery – Grave reference I. A. 2. His occupation previous to military service recorded as that of a fisherman* earning forty- five dollars a month, Robert Stanley Morgan presented himself for medical examination on December 10, 1914, at the Church Lads Brigade Armoury on Harvey Road in St. John’s, capital city of the Dominion of Newfoundland. It was a procedure which was to pronounce him as…Fit for Foreign Service. He was a recruit of the Second Draft. *A second document has his occupation as being that of a teacher. Only four days days later, on December 14, Robert Stanley Morgan was to return to the C.L.B. Armoury in St. John’s, there to enlist – engaged at the private soldier’s daily rate of a single dollar a day plus a ten-cent Field Allowance. It appears that he was also to attest on that same day. 1 Now for Private Morgan, Number 719, there was to be a seven-week waiting period. There are a number of files of recruits of the time which show that those from outside St. John’s were often boarded in the city while awaiting departure for overseas service. This arrangement was subsidized by the Newfoundland government even if it were a family member who was hosting the new soldier. Private Morgan was such a case: between the time of his enlistment and his sailing for overseas, Private Morgan boarded with a Mrs. S.J. Shepherd of 27, Hutchings Street. On the fourth day of February of 1915, the first re-enforcements – this was ‘C’ Company - for the Newfoundland contingent – it was not yet at battalion strength - which by this time was serving in Scotland (see further below), were to embark via the sealing tender Neptune onto the SS Dominion – the vessel having anchored to the south of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports Adversely to War ALLEN& Fieia-Marihal Lord (G.C.B., Offici on Development of Mudros Hap G C.M:G.)
    INDEX PERSONAL Ranks shown after surnames of officers and men are the highest standard attained by each, the appointments being those held at the time mentioned. Page numbers followed by n indicate that the reference is to a footnote on the page specified. The letters T., or T.C.; T.F.; and S.R., placed after R.A.M.C. or A.M.S., indicate that the commission held was temporary, or in the Territorial Forces, or Special Reserve. ABERDEEN, Capt. K. G. McK. BABTIE, Lt.-Gen. Sir W.-continwcd. (A.A M.C.), 826 246, 255; his duties, 273; authority ACHARDand BENSUADE(paratyphoid), extended to Salonica. 438; favours 455s departure of hosp shi S to time table, ALCORNMaj A (AAMC) 827 226. 3avn; his contra? of hosp. ships ALDRID~E, Lt.‘.coi. A. ‘R: (c.~’.,c.s.1 , asses to P.H T.O., 329; prcases C.M.G., R.A.M C), A.D.M.S. Sanr- for development of Lemnos for serious tary M.EF 252 351 cases 226. reports adversely to War ALLEN& FieiA-Marihal Lord (G.C.B., Offici on development of Mudros Hap G C.M:G.). Commands E.E.F.. 679. bour 227; his plans for great offm 681 688 . 724 742 752, succeeds sive,’ 283, 334 object of, not fully GeAeral kurra;. 6271 olan for Pales- achieved, 394; :nspects Aust. hosps. at tine offensive; ’ 660-’1: decision to Cairo, 257. his observations, 260, 271; advance on Jerusalem, 673; hacks disap roves administration of No. 1 anti-malaria campaign, 709; plans for A G.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Arms Operations in Allenby's Palestine Campaign
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons History Faculty Articles and Research History 2005 Armageddon’s Lost Lessons: Combined Arms Operations in Allenby’s Palestine Campaign Gregory A. Daddis Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/history_articles Part of the Asian History Commons, Cultural History Commons, Diplomatic History Commons, Military History Commons, Other History Commons, Political History Commons, Public History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Daddis, Gregory A., "Armageddon’s Lost Lessons: Combined Arms Operations in Allenby’s Palestine Campaign". Air Command and Staff oC llege, Wright Flyer Paper No. 20, Maxwell Air Force Base, Al: Air University Press, 2005. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Articles and Research by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Air University John F. Regni, Lt Gen, Commander Air Command and Staff College Ronald R. Ladnier, Brig Gen, Commandant James W. Forsyth, Col, PhD, Dean Dr. William T. Dean III, Director of Research, Series Editor Carol Atkinson, Lt Col, PhD, Series Editor Dr. William T. Dean III, Essay Advisor Air University Press Dr. Shirley B. Laseter, Director Emily J. Adams, Content Editor Sherry C. Terrell, Copy Editor Vivian D. O’Neal, Prepress Production Daniel Armstrong, Cover Design Please send inquiries or comments to: Editor The Wright Flyer Papers Air Command and Staff College (ACSC/DE) 225 Chennault Circle, Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Australian Horse, 34, 65, 75, 78, 85, 102, 122, 125, 135, 136
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19708-3 - Light Horse: A History of Australia’s Mounted Arm Jean Bou Index More information Index 1st Australian Horse, 34, 65, 75, 78, 1st Light Horse Brigade, 141, 143, 85, 102, 122, 125, 135, 136, 180, 145, 148, 150, 155, 156, 173, 262 182, 185, 187, 191, 201, 208 in Boer War, 40, 44, 49, 54 2nd Light Horse Brigade, 143, 145, 2nd AIF units 146, 150, 156, 187, 195 1st Independent Light Horse 3rd Light Horse Brigade, 143, 145, Squadron, 252 146, 150, 155, 163, 173, 178, 1st Independent Light Horse 182, 195, 198 Troop, 252 4th Light Horse Brigade, 145, 150, 6th Division Cavalry Regiment. 163, 173, 179, 182, 187, 188 252 5th Light Horse Brigade, 198 North Australia Observer Unit, 252 1st Light Horse Regiment, 146, 182, 207 A&NZ Mounted Division, 154, 157, 2nd Light Horse Regiment, 179, 158, 160, 162, 163, 164, 165, 173, 208 178, 185, 191, 193, 195, 197, 200, 4th Light Horse Regiment, 152, 260 163, 173, 177, 201, 241 formation of, 150 5th Light Horse Regiment, 145, and swords, 192 146, 178, 182, 208, 211, 215 views on mounted attack, 182, 6th Light Horse Regiment, 155, 184 211 Aborigines and frontier warfare, 14 7th Light Horse Regiment, 190, African horse sickness, 51 200, 207 AIF 140, 232 8th Light Horse Regiment, 146 AIF units 9th Light Horse Regiment, 154 See also light horse (AIF) 10th Light Horse Regiment, 146, XXI Corps Mounted Regiment, 179, 196, 209, 249 143, 150–2 11th Light Horse Regiment, 150, Australian Corps, 151 152, 163, 173, 181, 194, 210 Australian Flying Corps, 194 12th Light Horse
    [Show full text]