100 YEAR COMMEMORATION of the GALLIPOLI CAMPAIGN Go To
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Study Guide by Robert Lewis
© ATOM 2014 A STUDY GUIDE BY ROBERT LEWIS http://www.metromagazine.com.au ISBN: 978-1-74295-490-5 http://www.theeducationshop.com.au OVERVIEW The War That Changed Us (Electric Pictures 2014) is a 4 x 57 minute dramatized documentary that tells the story of Australia’s war effort from 1914-1918 through the focus or filter of six key historical characters: • General Harold ‘Pompey’ Elliott • Sergeant Archie Barwick • Nurse Kit McNaughton • Peace campaigner Vida Goldstein • War supporter Eva Hughes • Radical socialist Tom Barker. The series follows these six characters through their stories as told in their vivid and evocative personal testimonies — revealed in letters, diaries, speeches and newspaper articles written in the heat of the moment as the events of the war unfold at home and on the frontline. This study guide is in four parts, one for Driven by human stories, rather than the detail of military each episode. The introductory activities history, the series offers an opportunity to get close to the and summary activities are repeated each actual experience of war, and to learn how it changed the time, so if students have already seen any lives of those involved. As a result the political becomes episode of The War That Changed Us they personal and the epic everyday. We watch the series pro- can skip these and concentrate on the tagonists struggle with the opposing influences of imperial- questions and activities that are specific ism and independence, militarism and pacifism, Old World for that episode. enmities and New World utopian ideals. The War That Changed Us uses dramatic reconstruction, location filming, expert analysis and colourised black and The places where Australians fought and the nature of war- white archive to tell a gripping tale spanning three conti- fare during World War I, including the Gallipoli campaign. -
A Study Guide by Robert Lewis
© ATOM 2014 A STUDY GUIDE BY ROBERT LEWIS http://www.metromagazine.com.au ISBN: 978-1-74295-490-5 http://www.theeducationshop.com.au OVERVIEW The War That Changed Us (Electric Pictures 2014) is a 4 x 57 minute dramatized documentary that tells the story of Australia’s war effort from 1914-1918 through the focus or filter of six key historical characters: • General Harold ‘Pompey’ Elliott • Sergeant Archie Barwick • Nurse Kit McNaughton • Peace campaigner Vida Goldstein • War supporter Eva Hughes • Radical socialist Tom Barker. The series follows these six characters through their stories as told in their vivid and evocative personal testimonies — revealed in letters, diaries, speeches and newspaper articles written in the heat of the moment as the events of the war unfold at home and on the frontline. This study guide is in four parts, one for Driven by human stories, rather than the detail of military each episode. The introductory activities history, the series offers an opportunity to get close to the and summary activities are repeated each actual experience of war, and to learn how it changed the time, so if students have already seen any lives of those involved. As a result the political becomes episode of The War That Changed Us they personal and the epic everyday. We watch the series pro- can skip these and concentrate on the tagonists struggle with the opposing influences of imperial- questions and activities that are specific ism and independence, militarism and pacifism, Old World for that episode. enmities and New World utopian ideals. The War That Changed Us uses dramatic reconstruction, location filming, expert analysis and colourised black and The places where Australians fought and the nature of war- white archive to tell a gripping tale spanning three conti- fare during World War I, including the Gallipoli campaign. -
CHAPTER XXII on Their Return to Egypt the Australian Formations Were Sent to the Suez Canal Zone and Helped to Form There A
CHAPTER XXII EGYPT : REORGANISATION OF THE A.I.F. ON their return to Egypt the Australian formations were sent to the Suez Canal zone and helped to form there a new defensive front for Egypt. Simultaneously with this service the force was reorganised : the infantry into five divisions, forming, with the New Zealand Division, two army corps destined for the Western Front ; the light horse into the Anzac Mounted Division and other mounted units which became part of a British force which fought for the rest of the war in Egypt, Sinai, and Palestine. The self-government of the force in all matters of internal administration was established, though not yet entirely recognised by all the authorities that dealt with it; in the medical service the new director, his powers being now confirmed by the Commonwealth Govern- ment but not fully admitted by the War Office, collected the new medical staff of the A.I.F., hastened clearance to Australia, finalised reforms in the dental and nursing services, and carried out in the A.A.M.C. units a reorganisation, which embodied several experiments of interest. * * 8 The closing of the Gallipoli campaign opened for the A.I.F. a new phase in its history, with service in a much wider and more diversified sphere of action. The next Return to three months were occupied in a complete Eemt reconstruction and reorganisation of the force, carried out while the troops were taking their part in the dispositions for the new strategic situation. The mise-en-scine of the reorganisation was the neighbourhood of the Suez Canal. -
1 Introduction the General Experiences of Australian Prisoners
Introduction The general experiences of Australian prisoners of war in World War I have been neglected in both official and general war histories and accounts of the Anzac tradition. Even more neglected however are the experiences of Australian soldiers captured in theatres of war throughout the Ottoman Empire, including those captured at Gallipoli. Most examples of prisoner of war (POW) writing have concentrated on World War II POWs and the Japanese experience in particular.1 In the Australian War Memorial’s (AWM) collection dealing with Australian war captivity, for example, almost two thirds are concerned with World War II prisoners of the Japanese. Only ‘a tiny one percent’ is devoted to prisoners of the Turks.2 In the event that prisoners of war in Turkey are acknowledged, few sources are consulted. Selected memoirs and autobiographies are used uncritically without corroboration of other historical sources, particularly Turkish sources, to produce an overall picture of unrelieved brutality. It has been suggested that this historical neglect of prisoners of war can be explained by their representations of military failure, creating a sense of national shame. The fact that they have been captured suggests failure of leadership and planning at the highest level and also calls into question ‘the notion which has long been central to our national self-image, that our soldiers are especially competent fighters’.3 It is noteworthy in this context that the source of the Anzac tradition – the Gallipoli campaign – has not produced a scholarly study of the 1 See the following for an assessment of writers on prisoners of war (hereafter POWs): R. -
Download Download
British Journal for Military History Volume 7, Issue 1, March 2021 What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915-1918 Roslyn Shepherd King Pike ISSN: 2057-0422 Date of Publication: 19 March 2021 Citation: Roslyn Shepherd King Pike, ‘What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915-1918’, British Journal for Military History, 7.1 (2021), pp. 87-112. www.bjmh.org.uk This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The BJMH is produced with the support of IDENTIFYING MILITARY ENGAGEMENTS IN EGYPT & THE LEVANT 1915-1918 What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915- 1918 Roslyn Shepherd King Pike* Independent Scholar Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article examines the official names listed in the 'Egypt and Palestine' section of the 1922 report by the British Army’s Battles Nomenclature Committee and compares them with descriptions of military engagements in the Official History to establish if they clearly identify the events. The Committee’s application of their own definitions and guidelines during the process of naming these conflicts is evaluated together with examples of more recent usages in selected secondary sources. The articles concludes that the Committee’s failure to accurately identify the events of this campaign have had a negative impacted on subsequent historiography. Introduction While the perennial rose would still smell the same if called a lily, any discussion of military engagements relies on accurate and generally agreed on enduring names, so historians, veterans, and the wider community, can talk with some degree of confidence about particular events, and they can be meaningfully written into history. -
A History of 119 Infantry Brigade in the Great War with Special Reference To
The History of 119 Infantry Brigade in the Great War with Special Reference to the Command of Brigadier-General Frank Percy Crozier by Michael Anthony Taylor A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract 119 Brigade, 40th Division, had an unusual origin as a ‘left-over’ brigade of the Welsh Army Corps and was the only completely bantam formation outside 35th Division. This study investigates the formation’s national identity and demonstrates that it was indeed strongly ‘Welsh’ in more than name until 1918. New data on the social background of men and officers is added to that generated by earlier studies. The examination of the brigade’s actions on the Western Front challenges the widely held belief that there was an inherent problem with this and other bantam formations. The original make-up of the brigade is compared with its later forms when new and less efficient units were introduced. -
Egyptian Labor Corps: Logistical Laborers in World War I and the 1919 Egyptian Revolution
EGYPTIAN LABOR CORPS: LOGISTICAL LABORERS IN WORLD WAR I AND THE 1919 EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Kyle J. Anderson August 2017 © 2017 i EGYPTIAN LABOR CORPS: LOGISTICAL LABORERS IN WORLD WAR I AND THE 1919 EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION Kyle J. Anderson, Ph. D. Cornell University 2017 This is a history of World War I in Egypt. But it does not offer a military history focused on generals and officers as they strategized in grand halls or commanded their troops in battle. Rather, this dissertation follows the Egyptian workers and peasants who provided the labor that built and maintained the vast logistical network behind the front lines of the British war machine. These migrant laborers were organized into a new institution that redefined the relationship between state and society in colonial Egypt from the beginning of World War I until the end of the 1919 Egyptian Revolution: the “Egyptian Labor Corps” (ELC). I focus on these laborers, not only to document their experiences, but also to investigate the ways in which workers and peasants in Egypt were entangled with the broader global political economy. The ELC linked Egyptian workers and peasants into the global political economy by turning them into an important source of logistical laborers for the British Empire during World War I. The changes inherent in this transformation were imposed on the Egyptian countryside, but workers and peasants also played an important role in the process by creating new political imaginaries, influencing state policy, and fashioning new and increasingly violent repertoires of contentious politics to engage with the ELC. -
Milnesdickonjohn2000mahist.Pdf (11.58Mb)
THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY PROTECTION OF AUTHOR ’S COPYRIGHT This copy has been supplied by the Library of the University of Otago on the understanding that the following conditions will be observed: 1. To comply with s56 of the Copyright Act 1994 [NZ], this thesis copy must only be used for the purposes of research or private study. 2. The author's permission must be obtained before any material in the thesis is reproduced, unless such reproduction falls within the fair dealing guidelines of the Copyright Act 1994. Due acknowledgement must be made to the author in any citation. 3. No further copies may be made without the permission of the Librarian of the University of Otago. August 2010 IMPERIAL SOLDIERS? THE NEW ZEALAND MOUNTED RIFLES BRIGADE IN SINAI AND PALESTINE 1916-1919 D. JOHN MILNES A thesis submitted for the degree of Masters of Arts in History at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 1999. ll Abstract New Zealanders served in large numbers in three campaigns during the Great War of 1914-1918. Much has been written by historians, both past and present, about the experiences of the soldiers in two of these campaigns: Gallipoli and the Western Front. The third of these campaigns, Sinai and Palestine, is perhaps the least well known of New Zealand's Great War war efforts, but probably the most successful. This thesis is an investigation of how Imperial the New Zealanders who served in the Mounted Rifles brigade were. By this it 1s meant; were the soldiers characteristic of the British Empire, its institutions, and its ethos? Or were they different, reflecting distinctly New Zealand ideals and institutions? Central to this investigation were the views and opinions held by the New Zealand soldiers who served in the Mounted Rifles brigade in Sinai and Palestine from 1916-1919 regarding the British Empire. -
In Two Armies: the Experiences of Two Salvationists in the First AIF 1914-1918
Avondale College ResearchOnline@Avondale Arts Papers and Journal Articles School of Humanities and Creative Arts 8-2019 In Two Armies: The Experiences of Two Salvationists in the First AIF 1914-1918 Daniel Reynaud Avondale College of Higher Education, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://research.avondale.edu.au/arts_papers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Reynaud, D. (2019). In two armies: The experiences of two salvationists in the first AIF 1914-1918. The Australasian Journal of Salvation Army History, 4(2), 27-40. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Humanities and Creative Arts at ResearchOnline@Avondale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts Papers and Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@Avondale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IN TWO ARMIES: THE EXPERIENCES OF TWO SALVATIONISTS IN THE FIRST AIF 1914-1918 Daniel Reynaud Commissioner William McKenzie’s work as a chaplain in the Australian Imperial Force (AIF) is fairly well known in Salvationist circles, his work achieving legendary status both during and after the Great War.1 Lesser known is the contribution of his fellow Salvationist, Chaplain Benjamin Orames, who gave distinguished service for much of the war. The work of The Salvation Army in supporting the war effort in various wars, through its huts and canteens bearing the iconic Red Shield logo, has also been recognized.2 However, Salvationists not only served in the support services during World War One but also as enlisted men in the AIF itself. -
2015 the CENTENARY ISSUE Marking the 100Th Anniversary of the Gallipoli Landings
TheThe GallipolianGallipolian The Journal of the Gallipoli Association No. 137 - SPRING 2015 THE CENTENARY ISSUE Marking the 100th Anniversary of The Gallipoli Landings The River Clyde at V Beach, 25 April, 1915 by Charles Dixon - reproduced by kind permission of The Princess of Wales’s Royal Regiment (Queen’s and Royal Hampshires) SPRING2015 12/3/15 09:39 Page ii THE GALLIPOLIAN The Journal of the Gallipoli Association founded by Major E H W Banner in 1969 on the Campaign of 1915 The Gallipoli Association Registered Charity No. 1155609 Mailbox 630, Wey House, 15 Church Street, Weybridge KT13 8NA WEBSITE http://www.gallipoli-assocation.org PATRON HRH The Duke of Edinburgh KG KT PAST PRESIDENTS The Lord Granville of Eye Vice-Admiral E W Longley-Cook CB CBE DSO Lt. General Sir Reginald Savory KCMG KCIE DSO MC Brigadier B B Rackham CBE MC Lt Colonel M E Hancock MC TRUSTEES Chairman: Captain C T F Fagan DL Secretary: James C Watson Smith, Chelsea Lodge, Coopers Hill Lane, Englefield Green, Surrey TW20 0JX. Tel: 01784 479148. E-mail: [email protected] Treasurer: Mrs Vicki Genrich, , 78 Foxbourne Road, London SW17 8EW E-mail: treasurer @gallipoli-association.org Membership Secretary & General Enquiries: Mr Keith Edmonds 4 Duck End, Godmanchester, Huntingdon PE29 2LW Tel: 01480.450665 E-mail: [email protected] Editor: Foster Summerson, 23 Tavnaghan Lane, Cushendall, Ballymena BT44 0SY Tel: 028.217.72996. E-mail: [email protected] Webmaster & Historian: Stephen Chambers E-mail: [email protected] Major Hugh Jenner, Brigadier J R H Stopford ———————————————————— Other appointments: Historian Panel: Enquiries should be directed to: [email protected] Gallipoli 100 Sub-Committee: Lt. -
South African Forces in the British Army
From the page: The Long, Long Trail The British Army in the Great War of 1914-1918 South African forces in the British Army In 1902, just twelve years before Great Britain declared war, the armies of Britain and the Boer Republics (Transvaal and Orange Free State) had been fighting each other in the Second Boer War. There had been an extraordinary transformation in relationships between the countries in the intervening period and the Union of South Africa was to prove a staunch and hard-fighting Ally. Here is a summary of their story: South Africa enters the war on British side; some Boer conservatives rebel In August 1914 Louis Botha and Jan Smuts took the Union of South Africa into the war in support of Great Britain. Louis Botha, former member of the Transvaal Volksraad and an accomplished leader of Boer forces against the British in 1899-1902 had been elected the first President of the Union of South Africa in 1910. Jan Christian Smuts, another former Boer military leader, was his Minister of Defence. Both men had worked for increased harmony between South Africa and Britain since the end of the war in 1902. They now considered that South Africa, as a British dominion, must support the British side. They quickly ordered troops into German protectorate of South-West Africa. Many Afrikaners opposed going to war with Germany, which had aided them during the war against Britain (and continued a quiet propaganda war ever since). An attempted Boer coup against Botha's government failed in September 1914 when Christiaan Beyer - an Afrikaner hero from the earlier war - was killed by police, and a large armed uprising in the Orange Free State and the Transvaal later in the year was also held. -
Thelast Charge
The Last Charge An exhibition at the Buckinghamshire County Museum, Church Street, Aylesbury, HP20 2QP to commemorate the centenary of the last great British cavalry charges at El Mughar, Palestine on 13 November 1917. 31 October 2017 – 5 January 2018 Buckinghamshire Military Museum Trust www.bmmt.co.uk Buckinghamshire County Museum www.buckscountymuseum.org The Buckinghamshire Military Museum Trust gratefully acknowledges the support of the following without which this exhibition could not have been held: The Last Charge Buckinghamshire County Museum The charge of the 6th Mounted Brigade at El Mughar in Palestine on 13 November 1917 can claim to be the last great British cavalry charge although Lord Parmoor there were later charges in Syria in 1918 by an Indian regiment and by the The Crown Commissioners and BNP Paribas Australian Light Horse. The Institute of Directors Significantly, James Prinsep Beadle was commissioned to paint the charge at El Mughar as the cavalry contribution to a representative collection of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild and the Rothschild Archive Great War studies for the United Services Club in Pall Mall. Never previously The Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies exhibited outside of the building, which now houses the Institute of Directors, Beadle’s painting depicts ‘B’ Squadron of the 1/1st Royal Bucks The Buckingham Heritage Trust Hussars leading the charge against the Ottoman Turkish defenders. The regiment was commanded by Lieutenant Colonel the Hon. Fred Cripps, later The National Army Museum Lord Parmoor. The charge, which also featured the 1/1st Dorset Yeomanry The Berkshire Yeomanry Museum Trust with the 1/1st Berkshire Yeomanry in support, was described by General Sir George Barrow as ‘a complete answer to the critics of the mounted arm’.