DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Cincinnati

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________ I, _________________________________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in: It is entitled: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ Nationalism and Modernization A Comparative Case Study of Scots and Kurds A Dissertation Submitted to The Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph. D.) in the Department of Political Science in the McMicken College of Arts and Sciences 2008 By Ahmet Tolga Turker B.A. Bilkent University 1998 M.A. Eastern Illinois University 2000 M.A. University of Cincinnati 2003 Committee Chair: Dr. Joel D. Wolfe Abstract This dissertation explores the links between modernization and nationalism, and the question of why economic, political and socio-cultural processes of modernization have not led to the elimination of separatist nationalist movements. It tests hypotheses concerning modernization and nationalism on two prominent cases: the Scottish and Kurdish separatist movements in the United Kingdom and Turkey. Analyzing the relationship between economic modernization and nationalism, the economic modernization account is supported in both the Scottish and Kurdish cases for the period until the 1960s. However, it is discredited and found reductionist in the latter part of the twentieth century. Analyzing arguments that political modernization reduces separatist nationalism, this study found support for the political modernist account in both cases until the 1960s. However, the political modernist accounts failed to give a satisfactory picture of why Scottish and Kurdish nationalisms took a separatist turn since the 1960s. Finally, analyzing the socio-cultural links between modernization and nationalism, this project finds that these socio-cultural arguments are supported in the period prior to the 1960s in both cases. Although a significant causality between socio-cultural factors and nationalism could not established for the period after 1960, this study concludes that socio-cultural modernization tends to create conflict rather than reconcile differences in the period since the 1960s. In light of these findings, this study criticizes modernist accounts. It suggests that, along the lines of ethno-symbolist perspective, while nationalism is modern, it is constructed around a particular ethnic tradition that modern nations have to be explained and “contextualized” with reference to their ethnic forbearers . Accordingly, the following suggestions are made: first, nationalism should be iii examined in a larger time span, which will cover pre- modern attachments. Second, notions such as re-discovery and re-construction of the ethnic past should replace invention and imagination. Third, nationalism is not a history-specific and transitory force. Finally, modernity’s accelerated dynamism generates new nationalisms. iv Copyright @ 2008 A. Tolga Turker v Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the sources of intellectual, financial and moral support for my doctoral studies, which made this project possible. Professor Joel Wolfe supervised my doctoral thesis with enthusiasm and congeniality. His enduring support in pursuing this project and his considerable scholarship on British politics has made me look forward for our discussion sessions. Professor Dinshaw Mistry was a constant source of encouragement and motivated me to prioritize this project over other responsibilities when I was in need most. He never gave up reminding me the fact that this doctoral thesis had to be finished and provided me with organizational tools to do so. Professor Laura Jenkins provided enthusiastic support for my work, giving much needed suggestions for improving the dissertation. I hope other doctoral students will be as fortunate as I was in terms of a coherent and supportive dissertation committee. I acknowledge the financial support from the Department of Political Science and Charles Phelps Taft Research Center at the University of Cincinnati during my graduate studies. I would like to thank my parents who remained a great source of inspiration and support of my adventures. Finally I would like to thank my wife, Lisa, for her love and encouragement. Without her, I would not have relish life so much in the process of writing this dissertation. I was an undergraduate when my first nephew; Canberk was born. Naïvely, at the time, I planned to be part of his life. Then I came to the US to pursue my graduate studies and I not only ended up failing to see him grow up but also missed the birth of two more nephews; Burc and Tunc, and a beautiful niece; Elif. I completed this project at the expense of not being part of their lives. For that reason I dedicate this dissertation to them and ask for their understanding. Needless to say, I, alone, am responsible for any shortcomings or errors in this work. 2 Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 7 The Argument ................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Theory, Case Selection, and Methodology ..................................................... 24 The Study of Nationalism ............................................................................................. 24 Debates on Nationalism ............................................................................................ 25 What is Nationalism?................................................................................................ 27 Perspectives on how to study nationalism ................................................................ 33 Nationalism and Modernization................................................................................ 40 The Hypotheses............................................................................................................. 43 Modernization subverts separatist nationalism......................................................... 45 Observable implications............................................................................................ 48 Modernization reinforces separatist nationalism ...................................................... 49 Economic Modernization reduces separatist nationalism (H1) ................................ 52 Observable Implications: .......................................................................................... 53 Economic modernization fosters separatist nationalism (H1’)................................. 54 Political modernization reduces separatist nationalism (H2).................................... 56 Observable Implications: .......................................................................................... 58 Political modernization fosters separatist nationalism (H2’).................................... 59 Modernizing socio-cultural conditions reduces separatist nationalism (H3)............ 61 Observable Implications: .......................................................................................... 63 Modernizing social and cultural conditions promotes separatist nationalism (H3’) 63 A Note on the Effects of Modernization....................................................................... 65 Measurement................................................................................................................. 66 Nationalism............................................................................................................... 67 Elements of Modernization:...................................................................................... 68 Chapter 3: Scottish nationalism and modernization ......................................................... 72 A Note on European Nationalism and Scotland ........................................................... 74 Review of Scottish Nationalism.................................................................................... 75 I. Scottish Nationalism from the Treaty of Union until post- World War II ............ 75 II. Political Nationalism in Scotland Since 1960s .................................................... 80 III. Scottish National Identity Since 1960s............................................................... 90 Modernization and Scottish Nationalism...................................................................... 94 I- Economic modernization: ..................................................................................... 95 II. Political Modernization:..................................................................................... 106 III- Socio-cultural Modernization:.......................................................................... 123 Chapter 4: Modernization and Kurdish Nationalism...................................................... 138 Review of Kurdish Identity and Nationalism ............................................................. 139 I- The Kurds and the evolution of Kurdish Identity ............................................... 139 II- The Kurds in the Ottoman Empire (16 th – late
Recommended publications
  • Colony and Empire, Colonialism and Imperialism: a Meaningful Distinction?

    Colony and Empire, Colonialism and Imperialism: a Meaningful Distinction?

    Comparative Studies in Society and History 2021;63(2):280–309. 0010-4175/21 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History doi:10.1017/S0010417521000050 Colony and Empire, Colonialism and Imperialism: A Meaningful Distinction? KRISHAN KUMAR University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA It is a mistaken notion that planting of colonies and extending of Empire are necessarily one and the same thing. ———Major John Cartwright, Ten Letters to the Public Advertiser, 20 March–14 April 1774 (in Koebner 1961: 200). There are two ways to conquer a country; the first is to subordinate the inhabitants and govern them directly or indirectly.… The second is to replace the former inhabitants with the conquering race. ———Alexis de Tocqueville (2001[1841]: 61). One can instinctively think of neo-colonialism but there is no such thing as neo-settler colonialism. ———Lorenzo Veracini (2010: 100). WHAT’ S IN A NAME? It is rare in popular usage to distinguish between imperialism and colonialism. They are treated for most intents and purposes as synonyms. The same is true of many scholarly accounts, which move freely between imperialism and colonialism without apparently feeling any discomfort or need to explain themselves. So, for instance, Dane Kennedy defines colonialism as “the imposition by foreign power of direct rule over another people” (2016: 1), which for most people would do very well as a definition of empire, or imperialism. Moreover, he comments that “decolonization did not necessarily Acknowledgments: This paper is a much-revised version of a presentation given many years ago at a seminar on empires organized by Patricia Crone, at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.
  • Maori Feminism and Nationalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand Author(S): Radhika Mohanram Source: NWSA Journal, Vol

    Maori Feminism and Nationalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand Author(S): Radhika Mohanram Source: NWSA Journal, Vol

    The Construction of Place: Maori Feminism and Nationalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand Author(s): Radhika Mohanram Source: NWSA Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, Global Perspectives (Spring, 1996), pp. 50-69 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4316423 . Accessed: 10/04/2014 02:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to NWSA Journal. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 133.30.212.149 on Thu, 10 Apr 2014 02:00:58 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The Constructionof Place:Maori Femini'sm and Nationalism in Aotearoa/NewZealand RADHIKA MOHANRAM University of Waikato, New Zealand In his fascinating chapter of "Traveling Theory" in The World, the Text, and the Critic Edward Said speculates on how theoretical frameworks bom in response to a particular event or political situation reemerge in a different manifestation when they shift from one place to another, one time to another. The passage through time and space results in overlays of contexts and resistances until the theory is transformed in the new time, place, and context.
  • Christian Missionary Activities in Africa Revisite

    Christian Missionary Activities in Africa Revisite

    Obiora Ike Current debates about Colonialism, Slavery and Black Lives Matter: Christian Missionary Activities in Africa revisited "The refusal to take sides on great moral issues is itself a decision; it is a silent acquiescence to evil.” ( Ven Fulton J. Sheen (1895 -1979, American Bishop of The Catholic Church) 1. The recent trigger for the debates on recalling past history – On May 25 2020, the brutal and outrageous murder of a black American citizen under the hands of the United States of America white police officer Derek Chauvin who pinned the life out of him spread virally on video recording. Seemingly protected by State power, under socially tolerated traditions and legal institutions over centuries, these historically atrocious and racially based injustices have continued unabated in that country, and as is widely known, in many other parts of the world. The #BlackLivesMatter 2020 protests forced governments and other entities across the world to reckon with oppressive histories including slavery, colonialism and racism. It emboldened activists globally and boosted a new sense of humanity, solidarity and empathy and thus galvanized a new awakening of people to stand up everywhere with moral courage and demand that they “want to breathe”. The last words of George Floyd “I can’t breath” implies a re-visit of the many dark shades of human history, especially the chapters covering slavery, colonialism and racism which calls for the purification of memories in the present through recalling the horrible injustices of the past. To understand the political, cultural, economic and social tempers we see on streets happening in every continent, drawing crowds of inter-generational, inter- racial, inter-religious and multicultural activists globally it is necessary to have some knowledge of the preceding period in order to correct them.
  • Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination

    Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination

    Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination Anglophone Writing from 1600 to 1900 Silke Stroh northwestern university press evanston, illinois Northwestern University Press www .nupress.northwestern .edu Copyright © 2017 by Northwestern University Press. Published 2017. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data are available from the Library of Congress. Except where otherwise noted, this book is licensed under a Creative Commons At- tribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. In all cases attribution should include the following information: Stroh, Silke. Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination: Anglophone Writing from 1600 to 1900. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 2017. For permissions beyond the scope of this license, visit www.nupress.northwestern.edu An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high-quality books open access for the public good. More information about the initiative and links to the open-access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction 3 Chapter 1 The Modern Nation- State and Its Others: Civilizing Missions at Home and Abroad, ca. 1600 to 1800 33 Chapter 2 Anglophone Literature of Civilization and the Hybridized Gaelic Subject: Martin Martin’s Travel Writings 77 Chapter 3 The Reemergence of the Primitive Other? Noble Savagery and the Romantic Age 113 Chapter 4 From Flirtations with Romantic Otherness to a More Integrated National Synthesis: “Gentleman Savages” in Walter Scott’s Novel Waverley 141 Chapter 5 Of Celts and Teutons: Racial Biology and Anti- Gaelic Discourse, ca.
  • Empire and English Nationalismn

    Empire and English Nationalismn

    Nations and Nationalism 12 (1), 2006, 1–13. r ASEN 2006 Empire and English nationalismn KRISHAN KUMAR Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA Empire and nation: foes or friends? It is more than pious tribute to the great scholar whom we commemorate today that makes me begin with Ernest Gellner. For Gellner’s influential thinking on nationalism, and specifically of its modernity, is central to the question I wish to consider, the relation between nation and empire, and between imperial and national identity. For Gellner, as for many other commentators, nation and empire were and are antithetical. The great empires of the past belonged to the species of the ‘agro-literate’ society, whose central fact is that ‘almost everything in it militates against the definition of political units in terms of cultural bound- aries’ (Gellner 1983: 11; see also Gellner 1998: 14–24). Power and culture go their separate ways. The political form of empire encloses a vastly differ- entiated and internally hierarchical society in which the cosmopolitan culture of the rulers differs sharply from the myriad local cultures of the subordinate strata. Modern empires, such as the Soviet empire, continue this pattern of disjuncture between the dominant culture of the elites and the national or ethnic cultures of the constituent parts. Nationalism, argues Gellner, closes the gap. It insists that the only legitimate political unit is one in which rulers and ruled share the same culture. Its ideal is one state, one culture. Or, to put it another way, its ideal is the national or the ‘nation-state’, since it conceives of the nation essentially in terms of a shared culture linking all members.
  • Unlikely Identities

    Unlikely Identities

    Unlikely Identities: In May of 1911 an Ottoman deputy from Thessaloniki, Dimitar Vlahov, interjected Abu Ibrahim and the himself in a parliamentary debate about Zionism in Palestine with a question: “Are Politics of Possibility in 2 Arab peasants opposed to the Jews?” 1 Late Ottoman Palestine Answering himself, he declared that there was no enmity between Arab and Samuel Dolbee & Shay Hazkani Jewish peasants since, in his estimation, “They are brothers [onlar kardeştir], and like brothers they are trying to live.” Noting that in the past few weeks “anti- Semitism” had appeared on the pages of newspapers, he reiterated his message of familial bonds: “Whatever happens, the truth is in the open. Among Jewish, Arab, and Turkish peasants, there is nothing that will cause conflict. They are brothers.” Vlahov Efendi’s somewhat simplistic message of coexistence was not popular, appearing as it did in the midst of a charged debate about Zionist land acquisitions in Palestine.3 Other deputies in parliament pressed him about the source of his information on these apparent familial ties between peasants. He had mentioned “Arab newspapers,” but ʿAbd al-Mehdi Bey of Karbala wanted to know which ones he had consulted to support his claims. “In Jaffa there is a newspaper that appears named ‘Palestine,’” Vlahov replied. Commotion in the hall interrupted his speech at this point, but Vlahov continued, explaining how the paper suggested Hadera [Khdeira], south of Haifa, had been “nothing but wild animals” thirty years before but had recently become economically prosperous through Zionist settlement. Rishon LeZion, one of the first Zionist colonies, was another engine of development, as its tax revenue had increased a hundred- fold in the previous three decades, he claimed.
  • The Height of Its Womanhood': Women and Genderin Welsh Nationalism, 1847-1945

    The Height of Its Womanhood': Women and Genderin Welsh Nationalism, 1847-1945

    'The height of its womanhood': Women and genderin Welsh nationalism, 1847-1945 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Kreider, Jodie Alysa Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 04:59:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/280621 'THE HEIGHT OF ITS WOMANHOOD': WOMEN AND GENDER IN WELSH NATIONALISM, 1847-1945 by Jodie Alysa Kreider Copyright © Jodie Alysa Kreider 2004 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partia' Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2004 UMI Number: 3145085 Copyright 2004 by Kreider, Jodie Alysa All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 3145085 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
  • The Geographic Limits to Modernist Theories of Intra-State Violence

    The Geographic Limits to Modernist Theories of Intra-State Violence

    The Power of Ethnicity?: the Geographic Limits to Modernist Theories of Intra-State Violence ERIC KAUFMANN Reader in Politics and Sociology, Birkbeck College, University of London; Religion Initiative/ISP Fellow, Belfer Center, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Box 134, 79 John F. Kennedy St., Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] ——————————————————————————————————————————— Abstract This paper mounts a critique of the dominant modernist paradigm in the comparative ethnic conflict literature. The modernist argument claims that ethnic identity is constructed in the modern era, either by instrumentalist elites, or by political institutions whose bureaucratic constructions give birth to new identities. Group boundary symbols and myths are considered invented and flexible. Territorial identities in premodern times are viewed as either exclusively local, for the mass of the population, or ‘universal’, for elites. Primordialists and ethnosymbolists have contested these arguments using historical and case evidence, but have shied away from large-scale datasets. This paper utilizes a number of contemporary datasets to advance a three-stage argument. First, it finds a significant relationship between ethnic diversity and three pre- modern variables: rough topography, religious fractionalization and world region. Modernist explanations for these patterns are possible, but are less convincing than ethnosymbolist accounts. Second, we draw on our own and others’ work to show that ethnic fractionalization (ELF) significantly predicts the incidence of civil conflict, but not its onset . We argue that this is because indigenous ethnic diversity is relatively static over time, but varies over space. Conflict onsets, by contrast, are more dependent on short-run changes over time than incidents, which better reflect spatially-grounded conditioning factors.
  • WBHR 2015 2.Pdf

    WBHR 2015 2.Pdf

    i i i i Department of Historical Sciences Department of History Faculty of Philosophy and Arts Faculty of Humanities University of West Bohemia in Pilsen University of Hamburg Tylova 18 Von-Melle-Park 6 301 25 Pilsen D-20146 Hamburg Czech Republic Federal Republic of Germany i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i West Bohemian Historical Review V j 2015 j 2 Department of Historical Sciences Department of History Faculty of Philosophy and Arts Faculty of Humanities University of West Bohemia in Pilsen University of Hamburg Tylova 18 Von-Melle-Park 6 301 25 Pilsen D-20146 Hamburg Czech Republic Federal Republic of Germany i i i i i i i i Editors-in-Chief: Lukáš NOVOTNÝ / Plzeˇn/ Pilsen Gabriele CLEMENS / Hamburg Redaction: Roman KODET The journal is abstracted in The Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (CEJSH). Since October 2015 the journal has been included in the prestigious European database of scientific jour- nals ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences). Journal’s title abbreviation: WBHR Online at http://www.ff.zcu.cz/khv/en/about/research/vbhr.html ISSN 1804-5480 MK CREˇ 19550 i i i i i i i i Editorial board Stanislav Balík / Faculty of Law, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czech Republic Gabriele Clemens / Faculty of Social Sciences, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Anselm Doering-Manteuffel / Faculty of Humanities, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany Ewald Frie / Faculty of Humanities, University of Tübingen, Tübin- gen, Germany Radek Fukala / Faculty of Philosophy, J.
  • The Armenian Genocide

    The Armenian Genocide

    The Armenian Genocide During World War I, the Ottoman Empire carried out what most international experts and historians have concluded was one of the largest genocides in the world's history, slaughtering huge portions of its minority Armenian population. In all, over 1 million Armenians were put to death. To this day, Turkey denies the genocidal intent of these mass murders. My sense is that Armenians are suffering from what I would call incomplete mourning, and they can't complete that mourning process until their tragedy, their wounds are recognized by the descendants of the people who perpetrated it. People want to know what really happened. We are fed up with all these stories-- denial stories, and propaganda, and so on. Really the new generation want to know what happened 1915. How is it possible for a massacre of such epic proportions to take place? Why did it happen? And why has it remained one of the greatest untold stories of the 20th century? This film is made possible by contributions from John and Judy Bedrosian, the Avenessians Family Foundation, the Lincy Foundation, the Manoogian Simone Foundation, and the following. And others. A complete list is available from PBS. The Armenians. There are between six and seven million alive today, and less than half live in the Republic of Armenia, a small country south of Georgia and north of Iran. The rest live around the world in countries such as the US, Russia, France, Lebanon, and Syria. They're an ancient people who originally came from Anatolia some 2,500 years ago.
  • 1-Year MA Student Handbook 2020

    1-Year MA Student Handbook 2020

    Nationalism Studies Program 1-year MA Student Handbook 2020 - 2021 Central European University Nationalism Studies Program Quellenstrasse 51-55, Vienna, 1100, Austria Telephone: (36-1) 327-3000/2086 Web: https://nationalism.ceu.edu/ Vienna, September 2020 Nationalism Studies Program ............................................................................................ 1 Basic Academic Information ...................................................................................................... 3 Departmental Contact Information ........................................................................................... 4 I. Contacts ............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. Faculty ............................................................................................................................................... 5 General Information ................................................................................................................... 6 I. MA program ....................................................................................................................................... 6 II. General requirements and policies ................................................................................................... 7 III. CEU organizational structure and student representation .............................................................. 9 Course Requirements, Course Materials and Grading Procedures
  • Stear Dissertation COGA Submission 26 May 2015

    Stear Dissertation COGA Submission 26 May 2015

    BEYOND THE FIFTH SUN: NAHUA TELEOLOGIES IN THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES By ©Copyright 2015 Ezekiel G. Stear Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Spanish and Portuguese and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson, Santa Arias ________________________________ Verónica Garibotto ________________________________ Patricia Manning ________________________________ Rocío Cortés ________________________________ Robert C. Schwaller Date Defended: May 6, 2015! ii The Dissertation Committee for Ezekiel G. Stear certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: BEYOND THE FIFTH SUN: NAHUA TELEOLOGIES IN THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES ________________________________ Chairperson, Santa Arias Date approved: May 6, 2015 iii Abstract After the surrender of Mexico-Tenochtitlan to Hernán Cortés and his native allies in 1521, the lived experiences of the Mexicas and other Nahuatl-speaking peoples in the valley of Mexico shifted radically. Indigenous elites during this new colonial period faced the disappearance of their ancestral knowledge, along with the imposition of Christianity and Spanish rule. Through appropriations of linear writing and collaborative intellectual projects, the native population, in particular the noble elite sought to understand their past, interpret their present, and shape their future. Nahua traditions emphasized balanced living. Yet how one could live out that balance in unknown times ahead became a topic of ongoing discussion in Nahua intellectual communities, and a question that resounds in the texts they produced. Writing at the intersections of Nahua studies, literary and cultural history, and critical theory, in this dissertation I investigate how indigenous intellectuals in Mexico-Tenochtitlan envisioned their future as part of their re-evaluations of the past.