DOCSLIB.ORG

Studentnummer: 0181245

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Studentnummer: 0181245 GRA 1900 – Master Thesis 01.09.2011 Author: Kim H. Bertheussen The Political Economy of Corporate Governance: Testing a Transaction Cost Approach to Institutional Choice and Corporate Governance in Norway Hand-in date: 01.09.2011 Campus: BI Oslo Examination code and name: GRA 1900 – Master Thesis Programme: Master of Science in Political Economy Page 1 GRA 1900 – Master Thesis 01.09.2011 Index: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 RESEARCH METHOD: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 THEORETICAL BACKCLOTH .................................................................................................................................................... 5 STATE OWNED COMPANIES ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Raison d’être .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 STATE-SOE RELATIONSHIPS .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Depolitication - Faustian bargain or strengthened credibility? ............................................................................................ 9 EXPLAINING INSTITUTIONAL CHOICE ........................................................................................................................................... 10 A mix of many scholars ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 Functionalism Vs non-functionalism.................................................................................................................................. 12 DETERMINING RELATIVE DEGREES OF EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY .................................................................................................... 14 PRINCIPLE-AGENT LITTERATURE – AND WHY LEADERS DELEGATE. ............................................................................................. 15 IMPLEMENTING THE TRANSACTION COST APPROACH: ............................................................................................... 18 HORNS MODEL ............................................................................................................................................................................ 20 APPLYING HORN TO NORWAY ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 The Norwegian ownership structure ................................................................................................................................... 23 USING THE MODEL AS A UNIFYING TOOL ...................................................................................................................................... 24 ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 THE SELECTION OF INSTITUTIONS: ............................................................................................................................................... 26 HYPOTHESES’:............................................................................................................................................................................. 26 BUILDING THE MODEL ................................................................................................................................................................. 27 THE X-MODEL ............................................................................................................................................................................. 28 INDICATOR ’MEDIA’ .............................................................................................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. THE Y-MODEL ............................................................................................................................................................................ 29 INDICATOR: CONCEPTION OF INTENSITY ...................................................................................................................................... 30 MODEL 1 (ISOLATED MODEL) ...................................................................................................................................................... 32 IMPORTANT NOTE TO THE MODEL ................................................................................................................................................ 33 IMPOSING CONTROL VARIABLES .................................................................................................................................................. 33 INDICATOR: PIH .......................................................................................................................................................................... 34 MODEL 2 (WITH CONTROLS) ........................................................................................................................................................ 36 MODEL 3 (WITH CONTROLS, ALLOWING Ε OF SIZE AND CONFLICT COVARY) ................................................................................. 37 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 39 COMMENTS TO FINDINGS: ............................................................................................................................................................ 40 CONCLUSION: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 44 BIBLIOGRAPHY: ........................................................................................................................................................................... 45 APPENDIX...................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 BIVARIATE CORRELATION MATRIX: ALL VARIABLES .................................................................................................................. 51 SYNTAX ONLY CONFLICT – INTENSITY: ....................................................................................................................................... 55 SYNTAX MODEL 2 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 56 SYNTAX MODEL 3 (WITH 47 COMPANIES): ................................................................................................................................... 57 SYNTAX MODEL 3 (WITH 43 COMPANIES): .................................................................................................................................... 58 QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS: COI BOARD AVERAGES ...................................................................................................................... 59 QUESTIONNAIRES: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 62 ADDITIONAL DATA-DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................... 63 ‘CONFLICT’ INDICATORS: MEDIA, GOVCONF, PARLCONF .................................................................................................... 65 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES: ................................................................................................................................................................ 66 ALL VARIABLES_SORTED: ........................................................................................................................................................... 68 Page 2 GRA 1900 – Master Thesis 01.09.2011 Introduction The extent to which services should be performed in market or by state, is the everlasting balancing of democracy and efficiency. Equality and liberty. The extent to which power is delegated to politically independent bodies – fixes this balance. One of the core missions of the Political Economist is thus to reveal The politicians’ internal incentive-structure in determining levels of devolution, delegation and intensity of governance towards such independent bodies. For a long time, functionalist theory, economics, organizational theory and sociology have been dominant scholarly camps in search for such answers. Explanations often tend to focus on either (i) the (desired) end-state of the institutional product, (ii) rational choice analysis of the actors making decision and (iii) the sociological situation around the actor. Quantitative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Registration Document
    OKEA ASA 19.06.2020 Registration Document Registration Document OKEA ASA 19.06.2020 OKEA ASA 19.06.2020 Registration Document Important notice This Registration Document prepared according to Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, is valid for a period of up to 12 months following its approval by Norwegian FSA. This Registration Document was ap- proved by the Norwegian FSA on 19.06.2020. The prospectus for issuance of new bonds or other securities may for a period of up to 12 months from the date of the approval consist of this Regis- tration Document, a securities note and a summary if applicable to each issue and subject to a separate approval. This Registration Document is based on sources such as annual reports and publicly available infor- mation and forward looking information based on current expectations, estimates and projections about global economic conditions, the economic conditions of the regions and industries that are major markets for the Company line of business. A prospective investor should consider carefully the factors set forth in chapter 1 - Risk factors -, and elsewhere in the Prospectus, and should consult his or her own expert advisers as to the suita- bility of an investment in bonds, including any legal requirements, exchange control regulations and tax consequences within the country of residence and domicile for the acquisition, holding and dis- posal of bonds relevant to such prospective investor. The manager and/or affiliated companies and/or officers, directors and employees may be a market maker or hold a position in any instrument or related instrument discussed in this Registration Doc- ument and may perform or seek to perform financial advisory or banking services related to such instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Statens Eierberetning 2014
    STATENS EIERBERETNING 2014 Statsrådens forord Innhold Monica Mælandw næringsminister Contents Innhold 2 Statsrådens forord 3 Omfang og hovedtall 5 Sentrale saker Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer AS 94 for staten som eier 9 Norfund 95 Norges sjømatråd AS 96 Statsrådens forord 3 Kategori 3 – Forretningsmessige Norsk Helsenett SF 97 Avkastning og finansielle verdier 13 Omfang og hovedtall 5 mål og andre spesifikt definerte mål Norsk rikskringkasting AS 98 Sentrale saker for staten som eier 9 Aerospace Industrial Maintenance Norway SF 64 Norsk samfunnsvitenskapelig datatjeneste AS 99 Avkastning og finansielle verdier 13 Argentum Fondsinvesteringer AS 65 Norsk Tipping AS 100 Nøkkeltall Nøkkeltall økonomisk utvikling 19 Eksportfinans ASA 66 Petoro AS 101 Andre forhold 25 Electronic Chart Centre AS 67 Rogaland Teater AS 102 økonomisk utvikling 19 Omstilling: Hvorfor, hvordan og til hva? 34 GIEK Kredittforsikring AS 68 Simula Research Laboratory AS 103 Verdiskapende styrearbeid 37 Investinor AS 69 Siva - Selskapet for Industrivekst SF 104 Kommunalbanken AS 70 Space Norway AS 105 Andre forhold 25 NSB AS 71 Statnett SF 106 Posten Norge AS 72 Statskog SF 107 Omstilling: Statkraft SF 73 Staur gård AS 108 Kategori 1 – Forretningsmessige mål Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani AS 74 Trøndelag Teater AS 109 Ambita AS 44 UNINETT AS 110 Hvorfor, hvordan og til hva? 34 Baneservice AS 45 Universitetssenteret på Svalbard AS 111 Entra ASA 46 AS Vinmonopolet 112 Verdiskapende styrearbeid 37 Flytoget AS 47 Mesta AS 48 Kategori 4 – Sektorpolitiske
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL 2 YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME
    DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME Annual report 2019 DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL 2 YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME Gassco secures energy supplies GASSCO ANNUAL REPORT 2019 DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL 3 YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME FRODE LEVERSUND President and CEO Norwegian gas in a time of change Gassco secures energy supplies for Europe. We do this together with and on behalf of many important players on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). Safe, reliable and efficient operation is always our priority, and safety always comes first. It is gratifying to note that virtually all HSE indicators moved in the right direction during 2019. An absence of gas leaks provides an important example of this. We also again achieved good gas deliveries from the NCS, providing some 107 billion standard cubic metres (scm) of natural gas to the UK and continental Europe. That nevertheless represented some reduction from 2018. One reason for this decline is that we implemented an extensive maintenance programme on the transport network during the year. That work safeguards the integrity and safety of our gas deliveries for the future. GASSCO ANNUAL REPORT 2019 DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL 4 YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME Engagement with the climate expanded The first gas infrastructure on the throughout Europe in 2019 and set the NCS was constructed 43 years ago. A agenda. The world population is growing well-functioning and ever more extensive and ever more energy is needed. At the transport system has grown up. This has same time, greenhouse gas (GHG) been crucial for Norway’s position as one emissions must be reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Sak 1: Mål Og Indikatorer for Måloppnåelse Og Effektiv Drift I
    Sak 1: Mål og indikatorer for måloppnåelse og effektiv drift i heleide selskaper der staten har en samfunnsmessig begrunnelse eller et sektorpolitisk mål med eierskapet Målet med undersøkelsen har vært å vurdere om heleide selskaper der staten har en samfunnsmessig begrunnelse for eller et sektorpolitisk mål med eierskapet, benytter mål og indikatorer for måloppnåelse og effektiv drift og rapporterer med bakgrunn i disse. Videre er det vurdert i hvilken grad departementene følger opp og vurderer samfunnsmessige effekter eller sektorpolitisk måloppnåelse og effektiv drift i selskapene. Som eier skal staten utarbeide et tydelig mål for eierskapet, fastsette vedtekter og velge styre, samt følge opp statens forventninger. Staten kan også benytte virkemidler som sektorspesifikk lovgivning, konsesjoner, statlige tilsyn og finansielle virkemidler som tilskudd, kjøp av tjenester og brukerfinansiering. Valg av styringsvirkemidler og selskapsform setter rammer for selskapets virksomhet og for statens eieroppfølging. Selskapets styre skal utarbeide klare mål og strategier innenfor rammene av selskapets vedtekter og rapportere om oppnåelse av disse til eier. Flere av Riksrevisjonens tidligere undersøkelser har vist at staten i liten grad benytter eierdialogen til å følge opp de samfunnsmessige effektene eller den sektorpolitiske måloppnåelsen som ligger til grunn for eierskapet. Undersøkelsene har også vist at det er behov for å styrke selskapenes arbeid med å fastsette mål og indikatorer som gjør det mulig å vurdere måloppnåelse og effektiv drift. Studier foretatt av blant annet Sørensen og Rattsø og Direktoratet for forvaltning og IKT har pekt på lignende utfordringer. For å tydeliggjøre statens mål med eierskapet i det enkelte selskap har den statlige selskapsporteføljen siden 2006 vært inndelt i fire kategorier.
    [Show full text]
  • Risks and Barriers for Norwegian Companies on the Russian Oil-And-Gas Market
    Bodø Graduate School of Business Master of Science in Energy Management EN 310 E Risks and Barriers for Norwegian Companies on the Russian Oil-and-Gas Market by MARINA GRINBLAT and IRINA VOLKOVA SPRING 2007 Risks and Barriers for Norwegian Companies on the Russian Oil-and-Gas market Abstract Abstract During the last years Russia has changed its status from the dependent and conformable oil- and-gas supplier towards the major world energy player. This has happened due to its impressive reserve base, exploration potential and its preferable geographic position. Because of the positive trends in Russian economy Norwegian businessmen seem to be changing their attitude toward Russia. The intensity of cooperation in the energy sphere between these countries has increased recently. The purpose of the present research is to describe and analyze the risks and barriers that Norwegian companies face on the Russian oil-and-gas market. In so doing, it tends to contribute to a better and deeper understanding of the current Russian - Norwegian relations in oil-and-gas sector. This research is based on six in-depth interviews with Russian and Norwegian experts who represent different types of energy related businesses: consulting firms, newspaper, engineering firms and educational institutions. A combination of these perspectives provides a better understanding of the research problem and a deeper insight into possibilities of Russian-Norwegian cooperation. The background information on both Russia and Norway is important to establish the context and the culture of two countries, and Hofstede`s framework is expected to help us to get a clearer picture. Further on, this research aims to determine and describe in detail six main groups of risks and barriers (socio - cultural, political, legislative, technical, economic and environmental) for Norwegian companies and organizations based on the primary and secondary data.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 Content
    Annual report 2017 Content Point Resources Pro-forma key figures 4 in brief A platform for further growth established 6 Our history 8 Five core strategic activities 10 A diversified portfolio focused on four proven core areas 12 Material remaining potential in the Balder and Ringhorne area 14 Reserves and resources 27 Executive Management 28 From the Board of Directors 32 Board room Corporate governance 34 Board of Directors’ report 2017 36 Responsibility statement 42 Financial Consolidated Financial Statements 44 Statements Alternative Performance Measures 93 Financial Statements Point Resources AS (Parent Company) 94 Auditor's report 129 In the section Point Resources in brief, pro-forma numbers are used mainly to illustrate the operational and financial effect of the acquisition of ExxonMobil’s operated NCS portfolio in 2017 by use of the economic date of the transaction, 1 January 2017, rather than the date for closing of the transaction, 1 November 2017. It is in the Board of Director’s opinion that use of pro-forma numbers for 2017 is a representative way of showing Point Resources’ underlying performance for 2017. The Consolidated Financial Statements prepared according to IFRS are based on the completion date 1 November 2017, and numbers for 2017 in this section may therefore differ from the Consolidated Financial Statements. All production, reserve and resource data in this annual report are net to Point Resources AS. Point Resources AS has an ambition to become a leading, independent E&P company on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Form 20-F ANNUAL REPORT /2012 Annual Report on Form 20-F
    ANNUAL REPORT /2012 Annual Report on Form 20-F ANNUAL REPORT /2012 Annual Report on Form 20-F The Annual Report on Form 20-F is our SEC filing for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as submitted to the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The complete edition of our Annual Report is available online at www.statoil.com/2012 © Statoil 2013 STATOIL ASA BOX 8500 NO-4035 STAVANGER NORWAY TELEPHONE: +47 51 99 00 00 www.statoil.com Cover photo: Ole Jørgen Bratland Annual report on Form 20-F Cover Page 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 About the report 3 1.2 Key figures and highlights 4 2 Strategy and market overview 5 2.1 Our business environment 5 2.1.1 Market overview 5 2.1.2 Oil prices and refining margins 6 2.1.3 Natural gas prices 6 2.2 Our corporate strategy 7 2.3 Our technology 9 2.4 Group outlook 10 3 Business overview 11 3.1 Our history 11 3.2 Our business 12 3.3 Our competitive position 12 3.4 Corporate structure 13 3.5 Development and Production Norway (DPN) 14 3.5.1 DPN overview 14 3.5.2 Fields in production on the NCS 15 3.5.2.1 Operations North 17 3.5.2.2 Operations North Sea West 18 3.5.2.3 Operations North Sea East 19 3.5.2.4 Operations South 19 3.5.2.5 Partner-operated fields 20 3.5.3 Exploration on the NCS 20 3.5.4 Fields under development on the NCS 22 3.5.5 Decommissioning on the NCS 23 3.6 Development and Production International (DPI) 24 3.6.1 DPI overview 24 3.6.2 International production 25 3.6.2.1 North America 27 3.6.2.2 South America and sub-Saharan Africa 28 3.6.2.3 Middle East and North Africa 29 3.6.2.4 Europe and Asia
    [Show full text]
  • STATENS EIERBERETNING 2016 Contents Innhold STATENS EIERBERETNING 2016 1 Innhold 2 Statsrådens Forord 3
    STATENS EIERBERETNING 2016 Contents Innhold STATENS EIERBERETNING 2016 1 Innhold 2 Statsrådens forord 3 Norfund 94 Norges sjømatråd AS 95 Omfang Norsk Helsenett SF 96 Statsrådens forord 3 Kategori 3 – Forretningsmessige mål Norsk rikskringkasting AS 97 Omfang og hovedtall 5 og andre spesifikt definerte mål Norsk Tipping AS 98 Sentrale saker for staten som eier 9 Argentum Fondsinvesteringer AS 64 NSD – Norsk senter for forskningsdata AS 99 og hovedtall 5 Avkastning og finansielle verdier 13 Eksportfinans ASA 65 Nye Veier AS 100 3 Nøkkeltall økonomisk utvikling 19 Electronic Chart Centre AS 66 Petoro AS 101 Hovedtall 2016 Eierstyring 25 GIEK Kredittforsikring AS 67 Rogaland Teater AS 102 Kontinuerlig forbedring Investinor AS 68 Simula Research Laboratory AS 103 er kilden til evig ungdom 36 Kommunalbanken AS 69 Siva – Selskapet for Industrivekst SF 104 7 NSB AS 70 Space Norway AS 105 Posten Norge AS 71 Statnett SF 106 Statkraft SF 72 Statskog SF 107 Staur gård AS 108 Sentrale saker Kategori 1 – Forretningsmessige mål Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani AS 109 Ambita AS 42 Talent Norge AS 110 Baneservice AS 43 Trøndelag Teater AS 111 Entra ASA 44 Kategori 4 UNINETT AS 112 for staten som eier 9 Flytoget AS 45 – Sektorpolitiske mål Universitetssenteret på Svalbard AS 113 Mesta AS 46 Andøya Space Center AS 76 AS Vinmonopolet 114 SAS AB 47 Avinor AS 77 Veterinærmedisinsk Oppdragssenter AS 48 Bane NOR SF 78 Avkastning og Bjørnøen AS 79 Carte Blanche AS 80 AS Den Nationale Scene 81 Regionale helseforetak Den Norske Opera & Ballett AS 82 Helse Midt-Norge
    [Show full text]
  • Russian – Norwegian Oil & Gas Industry Cooperation in the High North
    Russian – Norwegian Oil & Gas industry cooperation in the High North Logistics and Transport - Report 31st of October 2014 The Core Team: Introduction by INTSOK To develop the High North as a new energy province, we must have the necessary technology to operate in vulnerable Arctic areas. The Russian – Norwegian oil and gas industry cooperation in the High North project (RU-NO Barents Project) is the largest project INTSOK has ever undertaken in any market worldwide. The scope of the RU-NO Barents project, as a strategic project for both countries, is illustrated by the participation of both government and industry from both countries, thus being a part of the official Norwegian – Russian Energy Dialogue. The main objective of the RU-NO Barents Project is, through industry cooperation and knowledge of Arctic technology needs, to contribute to the growth of the Russian and Norwegian industry participation in future petroleum endeavors in the High North. Acting on this objective, INTSOK has mobilized the industry to: Assess common technology challenges Russia and Norway face in the development of the High North Analyze existing technologies, methods and best practice Russian and Norwegian industry can offer for the High North today Based on the above: Visualize the need for innovation and technology development the industry in our two countries needs to overcome Promote stronger industrial links between our two countries It is envisaged that the RU-NO Barents project will benefit the industry, supporting their strategic decisions/direction for increased participation in field developments in the High North. The RU-NO Barents Project will also be an important arena to promote and ascertain their level of commitment given to innovation and technology development, forging stronger industry links and partnerships across the border to face our common oil and gas technology challenges of the High North and preparing the industry to meet and overcome these challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • STATENS EIERBERETNING 2007 Innhold
    STATENS EIERBERETNING 2007 Innhold Statens eierberetning for 2007 omfatter 52 selskaper der staten er eier og hvor dette eierskapet forvaltes direkte av departementene. Beretningen omfatter de selskapene hvor staten som eier i hovedsak har forretningsmessige mål og de mest sentrale selskapene med sektorpolitiske mål. SIDE SIDE SIDE Statens eierberetning 2007 3 KATEGORI 2 KATEGORI 4 Statsrådens forord 4 Selskaper med forretnings- Selskaper med sektorpolitiske mål Året 2007 for staten som eier 6 messige mål og nasjonal Avinor AS 74 Avkastning og verdier 12 forankring av hovedkontor Bjørnøen AS 75 Selskapenes økonomiske utvikling 20 Cermaq ASA 55 Enova SF 76 Andre forhold 27 DnB NOR ASA 56 Gassco AS 77 Statens eierforvaltning 33 Kongsberg Gruppen ASA 57 Itas amb AS 78 Eksterne bidrag Nammo AS 58 Kings Bay AS 79 – StatoilHydro: Et slagkraftig Norsk Hydro ASA 59 Kompetansesenter for IT i nytt selskap 36 StatoilHydro ASA 60 helse- og sosialsektoren AS 80 – Kongsberg Gruppens arbeid Telenor ASA 61 Norsk Eiendomsinformasjon AS 81 med samfunnsansvar 38 Yara International ASA 62 Norsk Rikskringkasting AS 82 – Eierstyring og bedriftsøkonomi Aker Holding AS1 63 Norsk Samfunnsvitenskapelig utenfor Oslo Børs 40 datatjeneste AS 83 Norsk Tipping AS 84 Petoro AS 85 KATEGORI 3 Simula Research Laboratory AS 86 KATEGORI 1 Selskaper med forretnings- SIVA SF 87 Selskaper med forretnings- messige mål og andre spesifikt Statnett SF 88 messige mål definerte mål Statskog SF 89 Argentum Fondsinvesteringer AS 46 BaneTele AS 64 Uninett AS 90 Baneservice AS 47 Electronic
    [Show full text]
  • Prop. 1 S Gul
    Prop. 1 S (2013–2014) Prop. Offentlige institusjoner kan bestille flere eksemplarer fra: Departementenes servicesenter Internett: www.publikasjoner.dep.no E-post: [email protected] Telefon: 22 24 20 00 Opplysninger om abonnement, løssalg og pris får man hos: Fagbokforlaget Postboks 6050, Postterminalen 5892 Bergen E-post: [email protected] Telefon: 55 38 66 00 Faks: 55 38 66 01 Prop. 1 S www.fagbokforlaget.no/offpub (2013–2014) Publikasjonen er også tilgjengelig på www.regjeringen.no Proposisjon til Stortinget (forslag til stortingsvedtak) Statsbudsjettet 2014 Trykk: 07 Aurskog AS – 10/2013 For budSjettÅret 2014 E JØM RKE IL T M Statsbudsjettet 2 4 9 1 7 3 Trykksak Innhold 1 Hovedtrekk i finanspolitikken 7 4 Oversikt over budsjettets 1.1 Den økonomiske politikken ......... 7 utgifter og inntekter ................... 50 1.2 Budsjettpolitikken ......................... 8 4.1 Innledning ....................................... 50 1.2.1 Hovedelementene i 4.2 Oversikt over budsjettets budsjettpolitikken .......................... 8 utgifter ............................................. 50 1.2.2 Bruken av petroleumsinntekter i 4.2.1 Oversikt over budsjettets budsjettpolitikken .......................... 9 samlede utgifter ............................. 50 1.2.3 Veksten i statsbudsjettets utgifter 10 4.2.2 Driftsutgifter (postene 1–29) ........ 51 1.2.4 Lånetransaksjoner og finansier- 4.2.3 Nybygg, anlegg mv. ingsbehov ....................................... 11 (postene 30–49) ............................. 53 1.2.5 Skatter
    [Show full text]
  • Statoil: a Case Study
    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY STATOIL: A STUDY IN POLITICAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP BY RICHARD GORDON GORDON ENERGY SOLUTIONS THOMAS STENVOLL HESS ENERGY TRADING COMPANY PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ENERGY STUDY SPONSORED BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER RICE UNIVERSITY – MARCH 2007 THIS PAPER WAS WRITTEN BY A RESEARCHER (OR RESEARCHERS) WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE JOINT BAKER INSTITUTE/JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER POLICY REPORT, THE CHANGING ROLE OF NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES IN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY MARKETS. WHEREVER FEASIBLE, THIS PAPER HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY OUTSIDE EXPERTS BEFORE RELEASE. HOWEVER, THE RESEARCH AND THE VIEWS EXPRESSED WITHIN ARE THOSE OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHER(S) AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY NOR THOSE OF THE JAPAN PETROLEUM ENERGY CENTER. © 2007 BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY THIS MATERIAL MAY BE QUOTED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION, PROVIDED APPROPRIATE CREDIT IS GIVEN TO THE AUTHOR AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ABOUT THE POLICY REPORT THE CHANGING ROLE OF NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES IN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY MARKETS Of world proven oil reserves of 1,148 billion barrels, approximately 77% of these resources are under the control of national oil companies (NOCs) with no equity participation by foreign, international oil companies. The Western international oil companies now control less than 10% of the world’s oil and gas resource base. In terms of current world oil production, NOCs also dominate.
    [Show full text]