DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Completion Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Completion Report Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs Republic of Indonesia JABODETABEK Urban Transportation Policy Integration Project Phase 2 in the Republic of Indonesia Annex 06: Travel Demand Forecast October 2019 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) ALMEC Corporation I N J R 2 0 - 0 0 4 Exchange rates used in the report EUR 1.00 = IDR 15,610.00 USD 1.00 = IDR 14,181.97 JPY 1.00 = IDR 131.69 (as of September 2019) JABODETABEK Urban Transportation Policy Integration Project Phase 2 in the Republic of Indonesia Annex 06: Travel Demand Forecast Table of Contents Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Objectives ................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Demand Forecast Workflow ................................................................................................ 1 1.2.1 Overall Framework ................................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 Activity-Based Modelling Structure ....................................................................... 2 Chapter 2 SOCIOECONOMIC FRAMEWORK .......................................................................... 11 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Population .......................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 11 2.2.2 Population Projection ........................................................................................... 14 2.2.3 Distributing Population to TAZ ............................................................................ 16 2.3 Employment and School Enrollment ................................................................................. 34 2.3.1 Workers at Residential and Workplace Profile .................................................... 34 2.3.2 Workers at Residential and Workplace Projection ............................................... 43 2.3.3 Students at Residential and School Place Profile ................................................. 51 2.3.4 Students at Residential and School Place Projection ............................................ 57 2.4 GDP and GRDP ................................................................................................................. 63 2.5 Household Income ............................................................................................................. 65 Chapter 3 ZONE SYSTEM AND NETWORK DEVELOPMENT .............................................. 69 3.1 Coverage Area for Travel Demand Forecast ..................................................................... 69 3.2 Zone System ...................................................................................................................... 70 3.3 Vehicle Type Classification ............................................................................................... 71 3.4 Project Year ....................................................................................................................... 72 3.5 Study Network ................................................................................................................... 72 3.5.1 Road Network ....................................................................................................... 72 3.5.2 Public Transport Network .................................................................................... 74 Chapter 4 MODEL DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................... 77 - i - JABODETABEK Urban Transportation Policy Integration Project Phase 2 in the Republic of Indonesia Annex 06: Travel Demand Forecast 4.1 Explanatory Variables ........................................................................................................ 77 4.1.1 Individual Status ................................................................................................... 77 4.1.2 Household Income ................................................................................................ 77 4.2 Model Estimation Results .................................................................................................. 78 4.2.1 Daily Activity-Travel Pattern Choice ................................................................... 79 4.2.2 Time-of-Day Choice ............................................................................................. 82 4.2.3 Mode and Destination Choice .............................................................................. 90 4.2.4 Additional Sub-Models ......................................................................................... 95 4.3 Application to a Microsimulation Model ........................................................................... 98 4.3.1 Auto/Motorcycle Ownership Model ..................................................................... 99 4.3.2 Activity Rescheduling ........................................................................................ 101 4.3.3 Joint Tour/Activity Generation ........................................................................... 102 4.3.4 Household Maintenance Tour Allocation ........................................................... 104 Chapter 5 MICROSIMULATION .............................................................................................. 105 5.1 Population Synthesis ........................................................................................................ 105 5.1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 105 5.1.2 Population Synthesis Methodology .................................................................... 105 5.1.3 Reproduction Check for Synthesized Population ............................................... 112 5.1.4 Summary ............................................................................................................. 117 5.2 Input Preparation .............................................................................................................. 117 5.3 Activity-Based Models .................................................................................................... 118 5.4 Intra-Household Interaction Rules ................................................................................... 119 5.5 Output Processing ............................................................................................................ 119 Chapter 6 TRUCK AND EXTERNAL OD ................................................................................ 122 6.1 Cargo Traffic Model ........................................................................................................ 122 6.1.1 Truck OD Survey................................................................................................ 122 6.1.2 Truck OD Matrix Development.......................................................................... 123 6.2 External OD ..................................................................................................................... 130 6.2.1 Cordon Line Survey............................................................................................ 130 6.2.2 External OD Matrix Development...................................................................... 131 Chapter 7 NETWORK ASSIGNMENT ..................................................................................... 133 7.1 Key Features .................................................................................................................... 133 - ii - JABODETABEK Urban Transportation Policy Integration Project Phase 2 in the Republic of Indonesia Annex 06: Travel Demand Forecast 7.2 Assumption ...................................................................................................................... 133 7.2.1 Value of Time (VoT), Occupancy, and PCU ..................................................... 133 7.2.2 Tariff System and Public Transport Parameter .................................................. 135 7.2.3 Capacity and Speed Relationship ....................................................................... 136 7.3 Validation......................................................................................................................... 138 Chapter 8 TRAVEL DEMAND FORECAST ............................................................................ 143 8.1 Do-Minimum and RITJ Case ........................................................................................... 143 8.1.1 Do-Minimum Case ............................................................................................. 143 8.1.2 RITJ Case ........................................................................................................... 147 8.2 Scenario Development ..................................................................................................... 149 8.2.1 Basic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bab I Pendahuluan
    BAB I PENDAHULUAN A. Latar Belakang Masalah Tangerang merupakan salah satu daerah di provinsi Banten yang berbatasan langsung dengan ibu kota negara, Jakarta. Tangerang terbagi ke dalam tiga wilayah, yakni Tangerang Kota, Tangerang Kabupaten dan Tangerang Selatan. Menurut toponimi nama Tangerang berasal dari kata berbahasa Sunda „tenggeran’ yang berarti „tanda‟. Tanda yang dimaksud ialah berupa tugu, yang didirikan oleh Pangeran Seogiri salah satu putra Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa sebagai batas wilayah kekuasaan Banten dan VOC. Tugu tersebut terletak di bagian Barat sungai Cisadane atau lebih tepatnya di Kampung Grendeng di ujung jalan Otto Iskandardinata. Tugu tersebut oleh masyarakat disebut tengeran (tanda). Kemudian karena perbedaan dialek, tentara Belanda yang berasal dari Makassar memanggilnya dengan Tangerang.1 Nama Tangerang seringkali disebut dalam sejarah Banten. Pada masa Kesultanan Banten. Tangerang dahulu kala sering juga disebut dengan „Benteng‟. Catatan F dee Han pada arsip VOC, melaporkan 1Juliadi dan Neli Wahyuni. Toponimi Sejarah Nama-nama Tempat Berdasarkan Cerita Rakyat. p . 88-89 1 2 bahwa pada 1 Juni 1660 Sultan Banten telah membuat sebuah negeri besar di sebelah barat sungai Untung Jawa. Untuk mengisi negeri baru tersebut Sulatan Banten telah memindahkan sekitar 6000 jiwa2. Negeri baru tersebut kini dipercaya sebagai wilayah Tangerang saat ini. Tangerang sejak ratusan tahun lalu merupakan daerah perniagaan, dan perhubungan sosial antar daerah. Pada masa kesultanan Banten masih berdiri, daerah ini merupakan batas akhir kekuasaan kesultanan saat kolonialisme Belanda memasuki Banten. Tangerang terus mengukir sejarah panjang, pada masa revolusi terjadi peristiwa besar di daerah ini yakni Peristiwa Serpong dan Lengkong. Pembahasan mengenai sejarah, tentu tak akan bisa lepas dari membahas tokoh-tokoh yang terlibat di dalamnya.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact of Railway Project A
    SOCIAL IMPACT OF RAILWAY PROJECT A CASE STUDY OF MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) JAKARTA, INDONESIA DAMPAK SOSIAL PROYEK KERETA API STUDI KASUS MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) JAKARTA, INDONESIA Listifadah Research and Development Land Transportation-Ministry of Transportation Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 5 Jakarta Pusat 10110 email: [email protected] Diterima: 11 November 2014, Revisi 1: 1 Desember 2014, Revisi 2: 10 Desember 2014, Disetujui: 19 Desember 2014 ABSTRACT Jakarta MRT system had been planned since the 1980’s. Many constraints such as political, finan- cial, as well as bureaucratic make the project delayed for a long time. When the plan scheduled to be implemented in a couple years ago, some protests arise. Communities and some interest group against. The fears of income decline and loss of livelihood become their main concerns which in- duce protests before the project really started. Based on this experience, this paper tries to reveal social impacts of transport development in case MRT Jakarta. Now the project construction is being carried out. Social impact as well as the project construction continues. This study investigate how social impact of railway project was happened. Literatures and documents analysis was used to analyze this study. The result of the study were the MRT Jakarta project inevitably have negative and positive impacts both for society and environment. But with the start of the project after a long delay, it gives hope to the community for better transportation. It is a positive impact before the project was completed. Community engagement in a meeting or discusssion should more be em- phasized in the process in order to minimize the conflicts of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesian Toll Roads NEUTRAL (Unchanged)
    Alpha Asiamoney's 2014 Asiamoney’s Southeast Asia 2013 Finance Asia's Sector flash 2013 2014 Best Best Domestic Best Best Domestic Research Call Equity House Equity House Equity House FMCG Sector 7 April 2015 Indonesian toll roads NEUTRAL (Unchanged) Bob Setiadi E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +6221 250 5081 ext. 3605 Policy updates Exhibit 1. Sector summary Code Ratings Share price +/- P/E EPS grwth . 4 SOEs to construct Trans-Sumatra toll-road sections: Upon obtaining CP TP (%) (x) (%) IDR3.6tn capital injection, Hutama Karya, a non-listed construction SOE, JSMR BUY 7,125 8,000 12.3 30.0 14.9 recently signed a toll-road concession agreement (PPJT) for the 17km Source: Bloomberg, Bahana estimates Based on closing prices on 7 April 2015 Medan-Binjai toll road, one of four Trans Sumatra toll-road sections (exhibit 8), assigned to Hutama Karya based on Presidential Decree No.100/2014. Exhibit 2. Inflation sensitivity to toll revenue Effect on toll-road revenue Inflation rate (%) The government plans to issue a new decree to form a consortium between 2015F 2016F Hutama Karya and three other listed SOEs (Jasa Marga, Waskita Karya and 11.0 2.0% 8.4% 12.0 2.2% 9.1% Wijaya Karya) to develop the Trans-Sumatra toll roads, utilizing the same 13.0 (base case) 2.4% 9.8% scheme that was successful in constructing the Bali Mandara toll road. While 14.0 2.6% 10.5% 15.0 2.8% 11.2% we support government’s plan to accelerate the Trans-Sumatra project, we Source: Bahana estimates; Note: Based on 2-year inflation are awaiting the announcement of the consortium agreements, as the adjustment Trans-Sumatra offers a relatively low IRR (7-17%) which could result in Exhibit 3.
    [Show full text]
  • FOUA00018-00025 Augustinus Adib Abadi
    The 5th International Conference of the International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU) 2011 National University of Singapore, Department of Architecture Global Visions: Risks and Opportunities for the Urban Planet URB A N H O USIN G SUSTA IN A BI L I T Y: B E T W E E N ID E A A ND R E A L I T Y Agustinus Adib Abadi* *Department of Architecture, School of Architecture Planning and Policy Development, Institute Technology Bandung, Jln. Ganesha 10, Bandung, Indonesia, Email:[email protected] and [email protected] A BST R A C T: One of several urban sustainability dimensions relates to urban housing quality. Conceptually, sustainable urban housing conditions could be realized through the provision of decent housing for all, which involves the role of government and policy-making. In dealing with urban housing insufficiency, the Government of Indonesia has introduced a housing ownership program for low to middle income people. However, housing ownership does not automatically present its incentives as the implementation of a sustainability idea requires the consideration of local context. This paper exposes the condition of low to middle income housing policy implementation in relation to urban housing sustainability. The fact that about 40.2% of low to middle income houses within the municipality of Bekasi, in West Java, Indonesia, are categorised as abandoned ones indicate the importance of local context consideration in dealing with sustainable urban housing objectives. K E Y W O RDS: housing sustainability, low to middle income, local context, Bekasi Indonesia 1 IN T R O DU C T I O N Cities in developing countries are facing problem of massive of urban population growth that influences urban transformation and conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Toko Indomart Di Kabupaten Tangerang
    DATA TOKO INDOMART DI KABUPATEN TANGERANG NO. NO. PENDAFTARAN PEMOHON PERUSAHAAN TANGGAL TERBIT NOMOR SK DESA / KELURAHAN KECAMATAN JENIS/PERUNTUKAN 1 00081/511.22/BPMPTSP/2016 HARGO SUSENO PT. INDOMARCO 27/03/2017 511.22/04-DPMPTSP/2017 KELURAHAN MEKAR BAKTI PANONGAN INDOMARET PRISMATAMA HARGO SUSENO PT. INDOMARCO 511.22/05-DPMPTSP/2017 DESA GELAM JAYA PASAR KEMIS 2 00086/511.22/BPMPTSP/2016 27/03/2017 INDOMARET PRISMATAMA HARGO SUSENO PT. INDOMARCO 511.22/06-DPMPTSP/2017 DESA WANA KERTA SINDANG JAYA 3 00085/511.22/BPMPTSP/2016 27/03/2017 INDOMARET PRISMATAMA HARGO SUSENO PT. INDOMARCO 511.22/07-DPMPTSP/2017 KELURAHAN MEKAR BAKTI PANONGAN 4 00084/511.22/BPMPTSP/2016 27/03/2017 INDOMARET PRISMATAMA 00094/511.22/BPMPTSP/2016 HARGO SUSENO PT. INDOMARCO 15/01/2018 511.22/01-DPMPTSP/IUTM/2018 KELURAHAN BENCONGAN KELAPA DUA MINIMARKET 5 PRISMATAMA INDOMARET RAYA KUTABUMI 00095/511.22/BPMPTSP/2016 HARGO SUSENO PT. INDOMARCO 15/01/2018 511.22/02-DPMPTSP/IUTM/2018 DESA KADU CURUG MINIMARKET 6 PRISMATAMA INDOMARET INDUSTRI KADU 00006/511.22/DPMPTSP/2018 LAUW HERDIAN SATYA DHARMA PT. INDOMARCO 19/03/2018 511.22/13-DPMPTSP/IUTM/2018 DESA CIHUNI PAGEDANGAN MINIMARKET 7 PRISMATAMA INDOMARET RUKO SPRINGS 00007/511.22/DPMPTSP/2018 LAUW HERDIAN SATYA DHARMA PT. INDOMARCO 19/03/2018 511.22/14-DPMPTSP/IUTM/2018 KELURAHAN KELAPA DUA KELAPA DUA MINIMARKET 8 PRISMATAMA INDOMARET SEKTOR 7C GADING SERPONG 00008/511.22/DPMPTSP/2018 LAUW HERDIAN SATYA DHARMA PT. INDOMARCO 511.22/15-DPMPTSP/IUTM/2018 KELURAHAN PAKULONAN BARAT KELAPA DUA MINIMARKET 9 19/03/2018 PRISMATAMA INDOMARET DIAMOND 00009/511.22/DPMPTSP/2018 LAUW HERDIAN SATYA DHARMA PT.
    [Show full text]
  • Lahan Pertanian Abadi (Lpa) Di Kabupaten Tangerang
    LAHAN PERTANIAN ABADI (LPA) DI KABUPATEN TANGERANG Yunita Ismail President University, Jababeka Education Park, Jln. Kihajar Dewantara Kota Jababeka, Bekasi 17550, Indonesia [email protected] ABSTRACT Tangerang regency is a supporting area for DKI Jakarta. The main function of this supporting area is as the human resource for fulfilling development needs of DKI Jakarta. Based on agricultural products from Tangerang regency, it is known that rice production almost 12 tons GKP/ha/year. This production is big enough to support harvest production nationally. Therefore, changing in dedicated agricultural field to be a non- agricultural area is considered will decrease rice production in Tangerang regency. Based on those conditions, it is needed to decide agricultural field which will not be used for non-agricultural activities, or so called agricultural land conversion (LPA). This research uses secondary data from Biro Pusat Statistik (Indonesia bureau of statistic) in Tangerang regency. The conclusion is that controlling the agricultural land conversion based on land capability survey in LPA area, as detail survey to irrigated rice field, non-irrigated rice field, and deep observation for agricultural field non-rice field. Keywords: LPA (agricultural land conversion), Tangerang, agricultural, rice production ABSTRAK Kabupaten Tangerang merupakan daerah penyangga bagi DKI Jakarta. Fungsi daerah penyangga yang paling utama adalah sebagai sumber tenaga kerja untuk memenuhi kebutuhan pembangunan DKI Jakarta. Dilihat dari hasil pertanian dari Kabupaten Tangerang, didapat bahwa produksi padi mencapai 12 ton GKP/ha/tahun. Produksi ini cukup besar untuk menunjang produksi panen secara nasional. Karenanya, perubahan peruntukan lahan pertanian menjadi untuk non pertanian dikhawatirkan akan menurunkan produksi padi di Kabupaten Tangerang.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport Carbon Public
    Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project RblE&ERenewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Project (REEEP) Project ID 108010494 Report 1 Technical Specification on Cleaner Fuel Buses for Direct Service March 2012 Table of Contents 1. BACKGROUND: DIRECT SERVICE CONCEPT 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Direct Service Concept 1.3 Fleet Type and Capacity 2. DEFINING SUITABLE FLEET FOR DIRECT SERVICE 2.1 Desired Vehicle Performance for Direct Service 222.2 Level of Emissions to be expected 3. FUEL TYPE : DIESEL or CNG? 3.1 The Benefit of Diesel 3.2 The Benefit of CNG 333.3 CbiiCombining the Two: CtiCreating A Sus ta ina ble Sys tem with Differen t Flee t AtArrangement 4. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DESIGN FOR DIRECT SERVICE BUSES 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Condition of Existing buses 4.3 Chassis and Engine Technical Specification 4.4 Body and Interior Specification and Design 4.5 Equipment and Supporting Tools Specification 5. PROVIDING RELIABILITY IN RUNNING THE DIRECT SERVICE 5.1 The Need for Maintenance Contract: How the Contract Should be Arranged 5.2 Quality Control: How to supervise the Maintenance and Quality Checking 5.3 Monitoring and Evaluation as Part of Quality Control 6. FLEET RECOMMENDATION Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project 2 Chapter 1 Background : Direct Service Concept Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project 3 CHAPTER 1 1.1 Introduction Transjakarta, the first Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in REEEP Project “Implementing Low Carbon Public Indonesia, started in 2004. As of February 2012 11 Transport in Jakarta” will outline plans and measures to Corridors, with 180 km long are in operation and served by be taken to implement the tranforming medium buses to 206 stations and 560 buses, 480 of which run on become Transjakarta Direct Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Kota 45 2 Blok M APTB Sinar Jaya Dalam Kota Blok M
    TERMINAL BUS BLOK M Jenis Angkutan Jumlah No. Terminal Perusahaan No. Trayek Jurusan Antar Kota Dalam Kota Kendaraan 1 Blok M damri Dalam Kota Blok M - Kota 45 2 Blok M APTB Sinar Jaya Dalam Kota Blok M - Bogor 7 3 Blok M APTB Mayasari Dalam Kota Blok M - Cileungsi 7 4 Blok M Trans Jabodetabek Dalam Kota Blok M - Ciputat 9 5 Blok M damri Dalam Kota Blok M - Bandara Soeta 14 6 Blok M PPD R. 45 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cililitan 6 7 Blok M Mayasari Bakti R. 57 Dalam Kota Blok M - Puloadung 5 8 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 05 T Dalam Kota Blok M - Bekasi 10 9 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 05 B Dalam Kota Blok M - Bekasi 10 10 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 34 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cimone 10 11 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 121 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cikarang 7 12 Blok M AJA Putra 138 Dalam Kota Blok M - Tangerang 7 13 Blok M metromini S. 69 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ciledug 27 14 Blok M metromini S. 70 Dalam Kota Blok M - joglo 9 15 Blok M metromini S. 71 Dalam Kota Blok M - Bintaro 5 16 Blok M metromini S. 72 Dalam Kota Blok M - Lebak Bulus 9 17 Blok M metromini S. 74 Dalam Kota Blok M - Rempoa 10 18 Blok M metromini S. 75 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ps. Minggu 29 19 Blok M metromini S. 77 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ragunan 4 20 Blok M metromini S. 610 Dalam Kota Blok M - Pondok Labu 26 21 Blok M metromini S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lembaran Daerah Kabupaten Tangerang Nomor 13 Tahun
    LEMBARAN DAERAH KABUPATEN TANGERANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2011 PERATURAN DAERAH KABUPATEN TANGERANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG RENCANA TATA RUANG WILAYAH KABUPATEN TANGERANG TAHUN 2011-2031 DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA BUPATI TANGERANG , Menimbang : a. bahwa berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang Pasal 78 ayat (4) huruf c mengamanatkan penyusunan atau penyesuaian Peraturan Daerah tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten; b. bahwa rencana tata ruang Kabupaten Tangerang sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Daerah Tingkat II Tangerang Nomor 3 Tahun 1996 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Tangerang sebagaimana telah dua kali diubah terakhir dengan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 3 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Daerah Tingkat II Tangerang Nomor 3 Tahun 1996 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Tangerang tidak sesuai lagi dengan perkembangan sosial, ekonomi, politik, lingkungan regional , dan global, sehingga berdampak pada penurunan kualitas ruang di Kabupaten Tangerang; c. bahwa penataan ruang dilakukan sesuai kaidah - kaidah perencanaan yang mencakup azas keselarasan, keserasian, keterpaduan, kelestarian, keberlanjutan, serta keterkaitan antarwilayah; d. bahwa ... -2- d. bahwa berdasarkan pertimbangan sebagaimana dimaksud pada huruf a, huruf b, dan huruf c, perlu menetapkan Peraturan Daerah tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Tangerang; Mengingat : 1. Pasal 18 ayat (6) Undang–Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945; 2. Undang–Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1950 tentang Pembentukan Daerah-Daerah Kabupaten Dalam Lingkungan Provinsi Jawa Barat (Berita Negara Tahun 1950); 3. Undang–Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok–Pokok Agraria (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1960 Nomor 104 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 2043); 4. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1984 tentang Perindustrian (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1984 Nomor 22 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3274); 5.
    [Show full text]
  • User's Guide for the Indonesia Family Life Survey, Wave 4
    User's Guide for the Indonesia Family Life Survey, Wave 4 AND ANNA MARIE WATTIE We recommend the following citations for the IFLS data: For papers using IFLS1 (1993): Frankenberg, E. and L. Karoly. "The 1993 Indonesian Family Life Survey: Overview and Field Report." November, 1995. RAND. DRU-1195/1-NICHD/AID For papers using IFLS2 (1997): Frankenberg, E. and D. Thomas. ―The Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS): Study Design and Results from Waves 1 and 2‖. March, 2000. DRU-2238/1-NIA/NICHD. For papers using IFLS3 (2000): Strauss, J., K. Beegle, B. Sikoki, A. Dwiyanto, Y. Herawati and F. Witoelar. ―The Third Wave of the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS3): Overview and Field Report‖. March 2004. WR-144/1- NIA/NICHD. For papers using IFLS4 (2007): Strauss, J., F. Witoelar, B. Sikoki and AM Wattie. ―The Fourth Wave of the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS4): Overview and Field Report‖. March 2009. WR-675/1-NIA/NICHD. ii Preface This document describes some issues related to use of the fourth wave of the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS4), alone and together with earlier waves of IFLS: IFLS1, 2 and 3. It is the second of six volumes documenting IFLS4. The first volume describes the basic survey design and implementation. The Indonesia Family Life Survey is a continuing longitudinal socioeconomic and health survey. It is based on a sample of households representing about 83% of the Indonesian population living in 13 of the nation’s 26 provinces in 1993. The survey collects data on individual respondents, their families, their households, the communities in which they live, and the health and education facilities they use.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab 3 Rencana Pembangunan Wilayah Di Kabupaten
    Laporan Akhir 3 - 1 BAB 3 RENCANA PEMBANGUNAN WILAYAH DI KABUPATEN TANGERANG 3.1 RENCANA PEMBANGUNAN JANGKA MENENGAH DAERAH Sesuai RKPD visi Kabupaten Tangerang adalah ”Menuju Masyarakat Kabupaten Tangerang yang Beriman, Sejahtera, Berorientasi Industri dan Berwawasan Lingkungan”, yang dimaksud dengan : 1. Masyarakat kabupaten Tangerang; adalah kelompok orang dengan segala aspek kehidupannya, yang meliputi sikap perilaku dan pola pikir dalam sosial budaya, agama, politik, ekonomi, hukum, ilmu pengetahuan teknologi yang memanfaatkan sumbar daya alam dan sumber daya buatan yang ada di Kabupaten Tangerang; 2. Beriman; adalah percaya, yakin dan taqwa kepada Tuhan Yang Maha Esa dengan memenuhi segala perintah-Nya dan menjauhi segala larangan-Nya serta hidup rukun antar umat manusia.Terpenuhinya kebutuhan manusia dari segi meteri memerlukan penyeimbang dari sisi rohani, sehingga terjamin keseimbangan mental dan spiritual; 3. Maju; berarti cerdas, sehat dan dinamis menuju taraf hidup yang lebih baik, proaktif, kreatif, dan disiplin sesuai dengan fungsi, peran dan kedudukan masing-masing anggota masyarakat; 4. Mandiri; berarti mampu mengatasi permasalahan dan hidup bertanggung jawab dengan tidak ada ketergantungan pada pihak lain Rencana Program Investasi Jangka Menengah (RPIJM) Kabupaten Tangerang Laporan Akhir 3 - 2 atau dikendalikan oleh pihak lain. Visi kemandirian adalah tetap berada koridor Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia yang berdasarkan pada Pancasila dan UUD 1945; 5. Berorientasi Industri; berarti perilaku yang mengarah pada pertimbangan ekonomis dengan memperhitungkan tenaga, waktu, biaya, dan sumber daya teknologi yang terus berkembang dan tidak hanya untuk memenuhi kebutuhan sendiri tapi beriorentasi pasar; 6. Berwawasan Lingkungan; berarti orientasi pembangunan mempertimbang-kan kondisi lingkungan yang harus dipatuhi oleh setiap pelaku pembangunan karena pembangunan berwawasan lingkungan akan memberi manfaat bagi kelangsungan hidup dan pembangunan.
    [Show full text]
  • At Serenia Hills WELCOME to SERENIA HILLS
    INTRODUCING at Serenia Hills WELCOME TO SERENIA HILLS Your private sanctuary in South Jakarta, Serenia Hills is an established residential community located in the prestigious Lebak Bulus neighborhood. TO SENAYAN/ LRT SENAYAN TO SOEKARNO HATTA AIRPORT PASARAYA GANDARIA PLAZA CITY BLOK M TO HI CIRCLE VIA MRT MALL BLOK M SQUARE BLOK M GANDARIA BLOK M TRANS JAKARTA STATION TO PASAR DHARMAWANGSA JL. KEMANG RAYA MINGGU SQUARE JL. SULTAN ISKANDAR MUDA JL. SULTAN JL. BINTARO BRAWIJAYA TO LRT JL. PANGLIMA POLIM WOMEN’S & CIRACAS CHILDREN JL. RADIO DALAM HOSPITAL DHARMAWANGSA KEMANG VILLAGE PONDOK INDAH JIS A PIM 2 M PIM 1 JL. PANGERAN ANTASARI A T JL. AMPERA RAYA U PONDOK A INDAH KEMANG 2.6 KM TO K I GOLF COURT JL. CIPETE RAYA PASAR MINGGU T PONDOK JL. R.A. KARTINI JL. CIPUTAT R TRAIN STATION A INDAH K . APARTMENT L J JL. SEKOLAH DUTA RAYA TALAVERA OFFICE PARK JL. METRO PONDOK INDAH JIS CITOS JAKARTA OUTER RING ROAD JL. TB. SIMATUPANG J L SILOAM . BINTARO L HOSPITAL SOUTH HIGHSCOPE E FATMAWATI B QUARTER INDONESIA A GENERAL K HOSPITAL B SOUTH JL. CILANDAK RAYA U CILANDAK L QUARTER JL. RS. FATMAWATI U SOUTH S DOME GROVE R A LEBAK BULUS TRANS JAKARTA STATION Y A JL. LEBAK BULUS 1 J L . K A R MAYAPADA A HOSPITAL N SINGAPORE G INTERCULTURAL T SCHOOL E N G A H A GREAT LOCATION 10 MINUTES TO PONDOK INDAH 7 MINUTES TO JORR TOLL 5 MINUTES TO THE TB SIMATUPANG BUSINESS DISTRICT 5 MINUTES TO MRT LEBAK BULUS STATION 4 SHOPPING MALLS 5 INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS 4 HOSPITALS WITH CONVENIENT SURROUNDINGS Serenia Hills is surrounded by a variety of public facilities that enhance convenience for residents in their daily lives, including schools, international standard hospitals and premium shopping centers.
    [Show full text]