DOCSLIB.ORG

Kota 45 2 Blok M APTB Sinar Jaya Dalam Kota Blok M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kota 45 2 Blok M APTB Sinar Jaya Dalam Kota Blok M TERMINAL BUS BLOK M Jenis Angkutan Jumlah No. Terminal Perusahaan No. Trayek Jurusan Antar Kota Dalam Kota Kendaraan 1 Blok M damri Dalam Kota Blok M - Kota 45 2 Blok M APTB Sinar Jaya Dalam Kota Blok M - Bogor 7 3 Blok M APTB Mayasari Dalam Kota Blok M - Cileungsi 7 4 Blok M Trans Jabodetabek Dalam Kota Blok M - Ciputat 9 5 Blok M damri Dalam Kota Blok M - Bandara Soeta 14 6 Blok M PPD R. 45 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cililitan 6 7 Blok M Mayasari Bakti R. 57 Dalam Kota Blok M - Puloadung 5 8 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 05 T Dalam Kota Blok M - Bekasi 10 9 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 05 B Dalam Kota Blok M - Bekasi 10 10 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 34 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cimone 10 11 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 121 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cikarang 7 12 Blok M AJA Putra 138 Dalam Kota Blok M - Tangerang 7 13 Blok M metromini S. 69 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ciledug 27 14 Blok M metromini S. 70 Dalam Kota Blok M - joglo 9 15 Blok M metromini S. 71 Dalam Kota Blok M - Bintaro 5 16 Blok M metromini S. 72 Dalam Kota Blok M - Lebak Bulus 9 17 Blok M metromini S. 74 Dalam Kota Blok M - Rempoa 10 18 Blok M metromini S. 75 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ps. Minggu 29 19 Blok M metromini S. 77 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ragunan 4 20 Blok M metromini S. 610 Dalam Kota Blok M - Pondok Labu 26 21 Blok M metromini S. 611 Dalam Kota Blok M - lebak Bulus 4 22 Blok M Kopaja T. 57 Dalam Kota Blok M - Kp. Rambutan 40 23 Blok M Kopaja 63 Dalam Kota Blok M - depok 5 24 Blok M Kopaja 66 Dalam Kota Blok M - Manggarai 27 25 Blok M Kopaja 605 Dalam Kota Blok M - Kp. Rambutan 5 26 Blok M Kopaja 605A Dalam Kota Blok M - Ragunan 9 27 Blok M Kopaja 608 Dalam Kota Blok M - Tanah Abang 7 28 Blok M Kopaja 609 Dalam Kota Blok M - Meruya 7 29 Blok M Kopaja 616 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cipedak 10 30 Blok M Kopaja 620 Dalam Kota Blok M - Manggarai 4 TERMINAL BUS GROGOL Jenis Angkutan Jumlah No. Terminal Perusahaan No. Trayek Jurusan Antar Kota Dalam Kota Kendaraan 1 Grogol Aja Putra P.104 Dalam Kota Grogol - Perum I, II, dan III 8 2 Grogol Mayasaribakti P. 29 AC Dalam Kota Grogol - Bekasi 7 3 Grogol Mayasaribakti APTB 05 Dalam Kota Grogol - Cibinong 15 4 Grogol PPD P. 213 Dalam Kota Grogol - Tb. Kp. Melayu 8 5 Grogol Agra Mas APTB 15 Dalam Kota Grogol - Ciawi Bogor 15 6 Grogol sinar Jaya APTB 16 Dalam Kota Grogol - Bubulak Bogor 10 7 Grogol sinar Jaya BSD Dalam Kota Grogol - BSD Tangerang 4 8 Grogol KWK/APK B. 01 Dalam Kota Grogol - Muara Angke 100 9 Grogol KWK/APK B. 08 Dalam Kota Grogol - Rawa Buaya 35 10 Grogol Komilet M. 41 Dalam Kota Grogol - Tabagus Angke 40 11 Grogol Komilet M. 43 Dalam Kota Grogol - Tb. Angke 8 12 Grogol Mikrolet M. 38 Dalam Kota Grogol - Benhil 25 13 Grogol Mikrolet M. 25 Dalam Kota Grogol - Tb. Kota 45 14 Grogol Mikrolet M. 45 Dalam Kota Grogol - Grandvile 25 15 Grogol Metromini B. 82 Dalam Kota Grogol - Kapuk 8 16 Grogol Metromini B. 83 Dalam Kota Grogol - Teluk Gong 10 17 Grogol Metromini B. 92 Dalam Kota Grogol - Cileduk 20 18 Grogol Kopami P. 12 Dalam Kota Kalideres - Grogol - Senen 80 19 Grogol Metromini B. 91 Dalam Kota Bt sari - Tb. Grogol - Tanah Abang 25 20 Grogol Kopaja B. 93 Dalam Kota Kalideres - Grogol - Tanah Abang 24 TERMINAL BUS AKAP KALIDERES Jenis Angkutan Jumlah No. Terminal Perusahaan No. Trayek Jurusan Antar Kota Dalam Kota Kendaraan 1 AK Kalideres Arimbi Antar Kota Jakarta - Merak 2 2 AK Kalideres Asli Antar Kota Jakarta - Labuan 2 3 AK Kalideres Murni Antar Kota Jakarta - Labuan 2 4 AK Kalideres Prima Jasa Antar Kota Jakarta - Bandung 2 5 AK Kalideres Bima Suci Antar Kota Jakarta - Bandung 2 6 AK Kalideres Tunggal Daya Antar Kota Jakarta - Sukabumi 1 7 AK Kalideres Langgeng Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Sukabumi 1 8 AK Kalideres Pandu jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Sukabumi 1 9 AK Kalideres agra Mas Antar Kota Jakarta - Bogor 4 10 AK Kalideres Marita Putra Antar Kota Jakarta - Bogor 2 11 AK Kalideres Warga Baru Antar Kota Jakarta - cikampek 2 12 AK Kalideres Merdeka/Waspada Antar Kota Jakarta - KR. Pucung 1 13 AK Kalideres Gapuraning Rahayu Antar Kota Jakarta - KR. Pucung 2 14 AK Kalideres Komara Antar Kota Jakarta - cikuya 1 15 AK Kalideres Sumba Putra Antar Kota Jakarta - Tirtomoyo 1 16 AK Kalideres sari Mustika Antar Kota Jakarta - Mauk 2 17 AK Kalideres garuda Mas Antar Kota Jakarta - Pati / Purwodadi 1 18 AK Kalideres Selamet Antar Kota Jakarta - Pati / Purwodadi 1 19 AK Kalideres Sumber Harapan Antar Kota Jakarta - Pati / Purwodadi 1 20 AK Kalideres haryanto Antar Kota Jakarta - Pati / Purwodadi 1 21 AK Kalideres Zentrum Antar Kota Jakarta - Pati / Purwodadi 1 22 AK Kalideres sido Rukun Antar Kota Jakarta - Purwodadi / Lasem 1 23 AK Kalideres Madu Kismo Antar Kota Jakarta - Purwodadi / Lasem 1 24 AK Kalideres Pahala Kencana Antar Kota Jakarta - Bojonegoro 1 25 AK Kalideres Putri Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Purwokerto 1 26 AK Kalideres Sinar Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Purworejo 1 27 AK Kalideres Ferdi Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Wonosobo 1 28 AK Kalideres Shantika Antar Kota Jakarta - Jepara 1 29 AK Kalideres Muji Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Jepara 1 30 AK Kalideres Bejeu Antar Kota Jakarta - Jepara 1 31 AK Kalideres Sumba Putra Antar Kota Jakarta - Tirtomoyo 1 32 AK Kalideres Sumber Alam Antar Kota Jakarta - Yogyakarta 1 33 AK Kalideres handoyo Antar Kota Jakarta - Yogyakarta 1 34 AK Kalideres Santoso Antar Kota Jakarta - Yogyakarta 1 35 AK Kalideres Murni jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Yogyakarta 1 36 AK Kalideres Damri ST. Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Yogyakarta 1 37 AK Kalideres Pahala Kencana Antar Kota Jakarta - Madura 1 38 AK Kalideres Sindoro satria Mas Antar Kota Jakarta - Wonogiri 1 39 AK Kalideres Safari Antar Kota Jakarta - Wonogiri 1 40 AK Kalideres Sedya Mulyo Antar Kota Jakarta - Wonogiri 1 41 AK Kalideres handoyo Antar Kota Jakarta - Wonogiri 1 42 AK Kalideres Kramat Jati Antar Kota Jakarta - Ponorogo 1 43 AK Kalideres Harta Sanjaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Ponorogo 1 44 AK Kalideres Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Ponorogo 1 45 AK Kalideres Merdeka/Waspada Antar Kota Jakarta - Karang Pucung 1 46 AK Kalideres Gapuraning Rahayu Antar Kota Jakarta - Karang Pucung 1 47 AK Kalideres Budiman Antar Kota Jakarta - Tasik / Banjar 1 48 AK Kalideres Karunia Bakti Antar Kota Jakarta - Singa Parna 1 49 AK Kalideres Sahabat Antar Kota Jakarta - Kuningan 1 50 AK Kalideres Setia Negara Antar Kota Jakarta - Kuningan 1 51 AK Kalideres P. Luragung Antar Kota Jakarta - Kuningan 1 52 AK Kalideres CHS 88 Antar Kota Jakarta - Bengkulu 1 53 AK Kalideres Krui Putra Antar Kota Jakarta - Bengkulu 1 54 AK Kalideres IMI Antar Kota Jakarta - Jambi 1 55 AK Kalideres NPM Antar Kota Jakarta - Padang 1 56 AK Kalideres bintang P. Bunda Antar Kota Jakarta - Padang 1 57 AK Kalideres sinar dempo Antar Kota Jakarta - Pagar alam 1 58 AK Kalideres Lantra Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Pagar alam 1 59 AK Kalideres Telaga Indah Antar Kota Jakarta - Pagar alam 1 60 AK Kalideres Siger Kencana Antar Kota Jakarta - Lampung 2 61 AK Kalideres Sami Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Lampung 1 62 AK Kalideres Laju Prima Antar Kota Jakarta - Palembang 1 63 AK Kalideres Lorena Antar Kota Jakarta - Palembang 1 64 AK Kalideres Kramat Jati Antar Kota Jakarta - Palembang 1 65 AK Kalideres Pahala Kencana Antar Kota Jakarta - Palembang 1 66 AK Kalideres Damri Antar Kota Jakarta - Palembang 1 67 AK Kalideres Citra Antar Kota Jakarta - Palembang 1 68 AK Kalideres Libersa Antar Kota Jakarta - Palembang 1 69 AK Kalideres Basuma Jaya Antar Kota Jakarta - Palembang 1 70 AK Kalideres Nusantara Antar Kota Jakarta - Purwokerto 1 71 AK Kalideres Rosalia Indah Antar Kota Jakarta - Purwokerto 1 72 AK Kalideres P. Pelangi Antar Kota Jakarta - Banda Aceh 1 73 AK Kalideres PM. Toh Antar Kota Jakarta - Banda Aceh 1 74 AK Kalideres Rema Abadi Antar Kota Jakarta - Pekan Baru 1 75 AK Kalideres Neo Harapan Antar Kota Jakarta - Madiun 1 76 AK Kalideres Sari Indah Antar Kota Jakarta - Madiun 1 TERMINAL BUS DK KALIDERES Jenis Angkutan Jumlah No. Terminal Perusahaan No. Trayek Jurusan Antar Kota Dalam Kota Kendaraan 1 DK Kalideres MAYASARI BHAKTI P.AC.02 Dalam Kota Kalideres - KP. RAMBUTAN 16 2 DK Kalideres MAYASARI BHAKTI P.AC.42 Dalam Kota Kalideres - CILEUNGSI 6 3 DK Kalideres MAYA RAYA P. 18 Dalam Kota Kalideres - CILEUNGSI 4 4 DK Kalideres MAYASARI BHAKTI P.AC.29 Dalam Kota Kalideres - BEKASI 8 5 DK Kalideres APTB APTB 14 Dalam Kota Kalideres - CIKARANG 12 6 DK Kalideres METRO MINI B. 80 Dalam Kota Kalideres - GROGOL 18 7 DK Kalideres METRO MINI B. 84 Dalam Kota Kalideres - KOTA 16 8 DK Kalideres KOPAJA B. 87 Dalam Kota Kalideres - MUARA BARU 5 9 DK Kalideres KOPAJA B.93 Dalam Kota Kalideres - TANAH ABANG 15 10 DK Kalideres KOPAMI P.12 Dalam Kota Kalideres - SENEN 53 11 DK Kalideres MIKROLET M.13 Dalam Kota Kalideres - KOTA 36 12 DK Kalideres APK / IDT B.09A Dalam Kota Kalideres - CIKOKOL 16 13 DK Kalideres APK / RODA NIAGA G.03 Dalam Kota Kalideres - KOTA BUMI 146 14 DK Kalideres APK / RODA NIAGA B.07 Dalam Kota Kalideres - SERPONG 41 15 DK Kalideres APK F.02 Dalam Kota Kalideres - CADAS 17 TERMINAL BUS KAMPUNG MELAYU Jenis Angkutan Jumlah No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Impact of Railway Project A
    SOCIAL IMPACT OF RAILWAY PROJECT A CASE STUDY OF MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) JAKARTA, INDONESIA DAMPAK SOSIAL PROYEK KERETA API STUDI KASUS MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) JAKARTA, INDONESIA Listifadah Research and Development Land Transportation-Ministry of Transportation Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 5 Jakarta Pusat 10110 email: [email protected] Diterima: 11 November 2014, Revisi 1: 1 Desember 2014, Revisi 2: 10 Desember 2014, Disetujui: 19 Desember 2014 ABSTRACT Jakarta MRT system had been planned since the 1980’s. Many constraints such as political, finan- cial, as well as bureaucratic make the project delayed for a long time. When the plan scheduled to be implemented in a couple years ago, some protests arise. Communities and some interest group against. The fears of income decline and loss of livelihood become their main concerns which in- duce protests before the project really started. Based on this experience, this paper tries to reveal social impacts of transport development in case MRT Jakarta. Now the project construction is being carried out. Social impact as well as the project construction continues. This study investigate how social impact of railway project was happened. Literatures and documents analysis was used to analyze this study. The result of the study were the MRT Jakarta project inevitably have negative and positive impacts both for society and environment. But with the start of the project after a long delay, it gives hope to the community for better transportation. It is a positive impact before the project was completed. Community engagement in a meeting or discusssion should more be em- phasized in the process in order to minimize the conflicts of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Failure in Jakarta Public Bus Transport
    Faculty of Economic Sciences, Communication and IT Doddy Hendra Wijaya SERVICE FAILURE IN JAKARTA PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORT Service Science Project Report Date/Term: Spring 2009 Supervisors: Bo Enquist Samuel Petros Sebhatu Karlstads Universitets 651 88 Karlstad Tfn 054-700 10 00 Fax 054-700 14 60 [email protected] www.kau.se 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background Populations in most developing countries are increasing much faster than car ownership levels and therefore an increasing proportion of the population is dependent on public transport except for very short journeys. In most countries, walking is the most common mode of travel for distances of up to one or two kilometers in urban areas and much further in rural areas. Those who own bicycles tend to use them for journeys of up to about eight kilometers, beyond which public transport is preferred mode. Public transport also provides an alternative to those who have private transport, but are sometimes deterred from using it by traffic congestion, parking difficulties or problems in accessing certain streets, although in practice it is relatively unusual, particularly in developing countries, for car owners to use public transport to any significant extent. However, in many developing countries families tend to be large, so that even if these is a car belonging to a household, most members of the family are still likely to use public transport for at least some of their travel (Iles 2005) Public transport is therefore vital for the vast majority without access to private transport. There is need for personal mobility, in particular for access to employment opportunities, but with low income levels affordability is a common problem, while the services provided are often regarded as inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of the Document
    Underage drivers rule the road by night “It’s not that hard once you’ve got it moving,” says Andi Ilham as he powers a lurching Metro Mini at high speed down a Jakarta street late at night. The No. 75 bus that he drives most nights, plying the popular route between Blok M and Pasar Minggu in South Jakarta, is one of a fleet of 13 that belongs to a distant relative, through whom Andi got the job. He says he started out as a conductor on one of the Metro Minis, and gradually learned how to drive the heavy, smoke-belching bus. Neatly dressed in a button-down checked shirt and jeans, and wearing closed shoes, Andi is not your typical Metro Mini driver. That’s because he’s only 16 years old. Too young to apply for a driver’s license or even an ID card — the minimum age for both is 17 — Andi has been driving Metro Minis since he was 15. He claims to be one of a growing number of underage sopir tembak — illegal drivers who fill in for the regular drivers, usually at night, when the streets are less crowded and the police not as likely to pull buses over for traffic infractions. While no government figures are available, the claim may hold water. When the Jakarta Globe visited Blok M, Senen and Manggarai bus terminals over several nights last week, many of the Metro Mini and Kopaja drivers admitted to being between 14 and 17 years old. These drivers, none of whom had a license, operate buses serving some of the most frequented routes, including Blok M to Ciledug, Manggarai to Pasar Minggu and Senen to Lebak Bulus.
    [Show full text]
  • Jakarta's Bus Rapid Transit System Indonesia
    Jakarta’s Bus Rapid Transit System CASE STUDY Indonesia | March 2016 "Transport in Asia and the Pacific faces a web of issues that need a strategic solution... Countries across the region have to contend with road safety, air pollution, social sustainability, climate change impacts, lack of public financing, decrepit infrastructure, and even cross-border bottlenecks, among others.” - James Leather, Co-Chair, ADB Transport Community of Practice Hoping to improve the worsening traffic situation in Jakarta, Sutiyoso—then Governor of Jakarta—bit the bullet and pushed for the construction of the Jakarta Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in 2001. With worsening traffic congestion and growing population of 8 million in 2000, BRT was thought as the ultimate solution to the traffic woes of people in the capital of Indonesia. The BRT masterplan is projected to have a busway network consisting of eleven corridors. The system is a closed trunk system without a functioning feeder system. The first corridor of Jakarta’s BRT of around 12.9 km, essentially consisting of a dedicated lane and loading platforms for large buses in the inner side of city streets, began operations in early 2004. Initially, the system ran well and showed good results—patrons’ travel time was reduced by an average of 20 minutes through a clean and convenient transport system that had longer operating hours. Pre-launch objections from affected bus operators and the driving public had disappeared. However, problems on the operational and managerial aspects of the project began to crop up a few months after the BRT was launched. Months after the BRT launch, Governor Sutiyoso—then governor of Jakarta—listened intently at the problems presented by the various stakeholders of Jakarta’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport Carbon Public
    Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project RblE&ERenewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Project (REEEP) Project ID 108010494 Report 1 Technical Specification on Cleaner Fuel Buses for Direct Service March 2012 Table of Contents 1. BACKGROUND: DIRECT SERVICE CONCEPT 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Direct Service Concept 1.3 Fleet Type and Capacity 2. DEFINING SUITABLE FLEET FOR DIRECT SERVICE 2.1 Desired Vehicle Performance for Direct Service 222.2 Level of Emissions to be expected 3. FUEL TYPE : DIESEL or CNG? 3.1 The Benefit of Diesel 3.2 The Benefit of CNG 333.3 CbiiCombining the Two: CtiCreating A Sus ta ina ble Sys tem with Differen t Flee t AtArrangement 4. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DESIGN FOR DIRECT SERVICE BUSES 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Condition of Existing buses 4.3 Chassis and Engine Technical Specification 4.4 Body and Interior Specification and Design 4.5 Equipment and Supporting Tools Specification 5. PROVIDING RELIABILITY IN RUNNING THE DIRECT SERVICE 5.1 The Need for Maintenance Contract: How the Contract Should be Arranged 5.2 Quality Control: How to supervise the Maintenance and Quality Checking 5.3 Monitoring and Evaluation as Part of Quality Control 6. FLEET RECOMMENDATION Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project 2 Chapter 1 Background : Direct Service Concept Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project 3 CHAPTER 1 1.1 Introduction Transjakarta, the first Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in REEEP Project “Implementing Low Carbon Public Indonesia, started in 2004. As of February 2012 11 Transport in Jakarta” will outline plans and measures to Corridors, with 180 km long are in operation and served by be taken to implement the tranforming medium buses to 206 stations and 560 buses, 480 of which run on become Transjakarta Direct Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparisson User's Time Value of Money on Operation of Public
    Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.9, 2011 Comparison User’s Time Value Of Money On Operation Of Public Transportation System in Jakarta Najid TaufikWijaya Engr, MT, Dr. Engineer Lecturer Graduated Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Tarumanagara University Tarumanagara University Fax: 62-21-5663277 Fax : 62-21-5663277 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Phone: 62-21-5672548 Phone: 62-21-5672548 Mobile: 62818156673 Mobile: 628593383368 Abstract: At the recent time, there is happened move of usage from transit (public transportation) usage to private usage especially motorcycle usage. We have known that level of user satisfaction is relatively depend on the whole situation of trip service variables in the city. The two main attributes that be user’s consideration as the measurement of transit service is travel time and waiting time of transit user. Those time are influenced by the characteristic of the user and the purpose of the user trip. So that is very important to know the time value of both travel time and waiting time of transit user. The time value must depend on various of trip purpose and user characteristic. The stated pereference survey method is applied on the quesionaire to get the data of user preference. Those time value will be differentiate by the trip purpose and the kind of transit (public transportation) service like Bus, Metromini/ Kopaja (Medium Bus) and Mikrolet (Micro Bus). Key Words : Waiting time, travel time, fare, time value 1. BACKGROUND Public transportation or Transit in Jakarta reached 140,000 vehicles and serving 53 routes, which inappropriate vehicle condition or vehicle’ages is more than 12 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Studi Kasus: Kopaja P20)
    ANALISIS POTENSI PERMINTAAN KOPAJA TERINTEGRASI TRANSJAKARTA (STUDI KASUS: KOPAJA P20) Purwhita Nuansa Budi, Alvinsyah Departemen Teknik Sipil, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, 16426, Indonesia E-mail : [email protected] / [email protected] Abstrak Koperasi Angkutan Jakarta (KOPAJA) P20 telah diintegrasi dengan Transjakarta, disebut KOPAJA P20 Terintegrasi. Namun integrasi ini tidak menarik banyak peminat dari penumpang KOPAJA P20 Reguler, dikarenakan sistem pembayaran yang sulit dan waktu tempuh yang tidak memenuhi SPM BRT. KOPAJA merencanakan perbaikan pelayanan dengan penggunaan tiket elektronik dan percepatan waktu tempuh serta akan menambah biaya transportasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan memperkirakan potensi permintaan KOPAJA P20 Terintegrasi. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan model logit berbasiskan persamaan fungsi utilitas yang dikembangkan dengan metode wawancara stated preference ke dalam beberapa skenario selanjutnya dievaluasi dan dipilih fungsi yang terbaik. Hasil analisis menyatakan bila selisih waktu 10 menit dan selisih biaya Rp500, Rp1000 dan Rp1500 potensi permintaan penumpang yang bersedia pindah dari KOPAJA P20 Reguler ke KOPAJA P20 Terintegrasi sebesar 78% (1.769 pnp), 55% (1.247 pnp) dan 29% (658 pnp). Selisih waktu 20 menit dengan selisih biaya yang sama, potensi permintaan penumpang sebesar 90% (2.041 pnp), 74% (1.678 pnp) dan 49% (1.111 pnp). Selisih waktu 30 menit dengan selisih biaya yang sama, potensi permintaan penumpang sebesar 95% (2.155 pnp), 87% (1.973 pnp) dan 70% (1.588 pnp). Mengacu pada hasil analisis peningkatan jumlah potensi permintaan KOPAJA P20 Terintegrasi tergantung dari pelayanan yang diberikan yang meliputi selisih biaya dan selisih waktu. POTENTIAL DEMAND ANALYSIS OF KOPAJA INTEGRATED WITH TRANSJAKARTA (Case Study: KOPAJA P20) Abstract KOPAJA P20 is a medium bus service which is integrated with Transjakarta system.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Entrepreneurs and Collective Violence: Assessing Spatial Variations in Anti-Chinese Rioting Within Jakarta During the May 1998 Riots
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Weeraratne, Suranjan Working Paper Ethnic entrepreneurs and collective violence: Assessing spatial variations in anti-Chinese rioting within Jakarta during the May 1998 riots WIDER Working Paper, No. 2010/55 Provided in Cooperation with: United Nations University (UNU), World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) Suggested Citation: Weeraratne, Suranjan (2010) : Ethnic entrepreneurs and collective violence: Assessing spatial variations in anti-Chinese rioting within Jakarta during the May 1998 riots, WIDER Working Paper, No. 2010/55, ISBN 978-92-9230-292-4, The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/54158 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    Mobility App and Citizens Views from Jakarta Livelihood, Social and Governance Implications of Innovation in Informal Transportation in the Developing World Mobility App and Citizens Ying Gao DRAFT September 2017 Acknowledgements This study is an independent academic research conducted mainly in July-August 2017 (MIT COUHES Protocol #1707014280 “Understanding and Measuring Citizen Perceptions of Informal Public Service Provision in the Case of Urban Transport in Indonesia”). The fieldwork was funded by MIT D-Lab International Development Innovation Network (IDIN, https://d-lab.mit.edu/idin) and MIT Governance Lab (MIT GOV/LAB, www.mitgovlab.org). This document is a research project output submitted to IDIN. I am indebted to wonderful colleagues in Indonesia for their kind support. I would like to express special thanks to fieldwork research assistants Alisa Delmafitri, Balqisa Farhani, Efod Pangkerego, Irena Lucy Ishimora, Joce Timoty Pardosi, Malindo Marpaung, Meidyca Febriandila, Nur Ratna Mukti, and Wahyu Widi Astuti, as well as colleagues at Kemitraan Habitat, MIT Urban Risk Lab PetaBencana Jakarta project office, RuangWaktu – Knowledge Hub for Sustainable (Urban) Development, University of Indonesia Faculty of Law Student Council, University of Indonesia Geography Department, and USAID Jakarta Office. Many others also generously gave help and insights, to which I am grateful. If there are mistakes or inconsistencies of information in this document, they are mine. Contact Information Ying Gao email: [email protected] | Dept. of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) MOBILITY APP AND CITIZENS 2 DRAFT September 2017 Table of Contents List of Acronyms 4 I. Introduction 5 From Innovation to Impact 5 Jakarta: Setting the Scene 6 Research Design: Stakeholder Interviews 8 II.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OPTIMAL PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS MODEL for TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Case Study Dukuh Atas, Jakarta, Indonesia
    THE OPTIMAL PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS MODEL FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Case Study Dukuh Atas, Jakarta, Indonesia Daniel Azka Alfarobi Supervisors: Ruth L Steiner, Professor William L. Tilson, Professor Christopher Silver, Professor A MASTER RESEARCH PROJECT (MRP) PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURAL STUDIES WITH A CONCENTRATION IN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2015 © 2015 Daniel Azka Alfarobi 2 To my Family 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This MRP might never have completed without help of many people that gave me contribution with data, information, knowledge and support, which I would like to express my gratitude to all of them. I would like to foremost like to thank my family for their support during this period of my study, in particular to my wife Astriana Harjanti, my son Kimi Rafarel Alfarobi, and my daughter Priyanka Namira Alfarobi. I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Ruth L. Steiner, Ph.D. for the guidance to complete this MRP with useful critiques and encouragement. My deepest thanks also goes to Professor Christopher Silver, Ph.D. FAICP and Professor William L. Tilson who give me an opportunity to study Sustainable Design at University of Florida. To all relatives, friends, and others who in one way or another shared their support, thank you. Last but not least, I gave deepest gratitude to Allah, SWT that made all of this possible. Daniel Azka Alfarobi 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................... 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................... 5 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa Judul Program
    PROPOSAL PROGRAM KREATIVITAS MAHASISWA JUDUL PROGRAM DESIGN ‘KURSI LIPAT’ UNTUK INTERIOR KOPAJA SEBAGAI SOLUSI PERMASALAHAN KENYAMANAN KOPAJA BIDANG KEGIATAN: PKM GAGASAN TERTULIS Diusulkan oleh: Herlizar Rachman 1206210811 Angkatan 2012 Mohammad Rizki Adi P. 1306384082 Angkatan 2013 Monica Dwiyanti 1306383930 Angkatan 2013 UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA DEPOK 2015 PENGESAHAN PKM-GAGASAN TERTULIS 1. Judul Kegiatan : Design ‘Kursi Lipat’ untuk Interior Kopaja sebagai Solusi Permasalahan Kenyamanan Kopaja 2. Bidang Kegiatan : PKM-GT 3. Ketua Pelaksana Kegiatan a. Nama Lengkap : Mohammad Rizki Adi Pradana b. NIM : 1306384082 c. Jurusan : Ilmu Hubungan Internasional d. Universitas : Universitas Indonesia e. Alamat Rumah : Rumah Kepemimpinan PPSDMS, Jalan Lenteng Agung No. 20B, 12640. f. No. Telp/HP. : 0857 8130 7916 g. Alamat Email : [email protected] 4. Anggota Pelaksana Kegiatan : 2 orang 5. Dosen Pendamping a. Nama Lengkap : b. NIDN : c. Alamat Rumah : d. No. Telp/HP. : Depok, Oktober 2015 Menyetujui, Wakil Manajer Kemahasiswaan FISIP UI, Ketua Pelaksana Kegiatan, Yogo Tri Hendiarto, S.Sos., M.Si. Mohammad Rizki Adi P. NIP. 198011302008121002 NPM. 1306384082 Direktur Kemahasiswaan UI, Dosen Pendamping Arman Nefi, S.H., M.M. NUK. 0508050277 NIP. ii DAFTAR ISI HALAMAN SAMPUL.............................................................................................i HALAMAN PENGESAHAN.................................................................................ii DAFTAR ISI...........................................................................................................iii
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Mobility in Developing Country Cities: Evaluating Bus Rapid Transit and Other Policies in Jakarta⇤
    Improving Mobility in Developing Country Cities: Evaluating Bus Rapid Transit and Other Policies in Jakarta⇤ Arya Gaduh Tadeja Gracnerˇ Alexander D. Rothenberg† University of Arkansas RAND Corporation RAND Corporation November 2017 Abstract In many developing countries, urbanization is proceeding at an astonishing pace, but transport policy decisions have often not anticipated the pace of growth, leading to congestion. This paper uses reduced form and structural techniques to evaluate different transport policy options for reducing congestion in the city of Jakarta. We first study the TransJakarta Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system, a public transport initiative designed to reduce congestion and improve mobility for the greater Jakarta metropolitan area. To evaluate the system, we compare changes in outcomes for neighborhoods close to BRT stations to neighborhoods close to planned but unbuilt stations. Contrary to anecdotal ev- idence from other city experiences with BRT systems, we find that the BRT system did not greatly increase transit ridership or reduce motor vehicle ownership. Instead, motorcycle vehicle ownership increased substantially, while ridership in the traditional public bus system fell. Moreover, by tak- ing up scarce road space, the BRT system exacerbated congestion on the routes it served, leading to increased travel times for other modes. To better predict the impacts of counterfactual transport poli- cies, we estimate an equilibrium model of commuting choices with endogenous commuting times. Our findings suggest that improvements to the BRT system would only modestly impact public tran- sit ridership. Instead, implementing congestion pricing or reducing gasoline price subsidies would have a much larger impact on mode and departure time choices.
    [Show full text]