Compilation of Minimum and Maximum Isotope Ratios of Selected Elements in Naturally Occurring Terrestrial Materials and Reagents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Compilation of Minimum and Maximum Isotope Ratios of Selected Elements in Naturally Occurring Terrestrial Materials and Reagents Compilation of Minimum and Maximum Isotope Ratios of Selected Elements in Naturally Occurring Terrestrial Materials and Reagents U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4222 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Compilation of Minimum and Maximum Isotope Ratios of Selected Elements in Naturally Occurring Terrestrial Materials and Reagents by T. B. Coplen1, J. A. Hopple1, J. K. Böhlke1, H. S. Peiser1, S. E. Rieder1, H. R. Krouse2, K. J. R. Rosman3, T. Ding4, R. D. Vocke, Jr.5, K. M. Révész1, A. Lamberty6, P. Taylor6, and P. De Bièvre6 1U.S. Geological Survey, 431 National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA 2The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada 3Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, 6001, Australia 4Institute of Mineral Deposits, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100037, China 5National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8391, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899 6Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Commission of the European Communities Joint Research Centre, B-2440 Geel, Belgium Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4222 Reston, Virginia 2002 (Revised in August 2002; reprinted in February 2003 and March 2006) U.S. Department of the Interior GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director The use of trade, brand, or product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information contact: Chief, Isotope Fractionation Project U.S. Geological Survey Mail Stop 431 – National Center Reston, Virginia 20192 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................2 Basic Concepts................................................................................................................................................2 Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................................4 Hydrogen..................................................................................................................................................................4 Reference materials and reporting of isotope ratios......................................................................................5 Ranges in isotopic composition......................................................................................................................5 Water........................................................................................................................................................5 Silicates....................................................................................................................................................6 Hydroxides...............................................................................................................................................8 Organic hydrogen....................................................................................................................................8 Methane .................................................................................................................................................10 Hydrogen gas.........................................................................................................................................10 Lithium...................................................................................................................................................................11 Reference materials and reporting of isotope ratios....................................................................................11 Ranges in isotopic composition....................................................................................................................11 Marine sources......................................................................................................................................11 Non-marine sources...............................................................................................................................13 Lithium in rocks....................................................................................................................................13 Phosphates .............................................................................................................................................13 Silicates..................................................................................................................................................14 Reagents.................................................................................................................................................14 Boron......................................................................................................................................................................15 Reference materials and reporting of isotope ratios....................................................................................15 Ranges in isotopic composition....................................................................................................................15 Marine sources......................................................................................................................................15 Non-marine sources...............................................................................................................................16 Igneous rocks.........................................................................................................................................19 Metamorphic rocks................................................................................................................................19 Sediments...............................................................................................................................................19 Organic boron........................................................................................................................................19 Carbon ....................................................................................................................................................................20 Reference materials and reporting of isotope ratios....................................................................................20 Ranges in isotopic composition....................................................................................................................20 Carbonate and bicarbonate...................................................................................................................20 Carbon dioxide......................................................................................................................................25 Oxalates..................................................................................................................................................26 Carbon monoxide..................................................................................................................................26 Organic carbon......................................................................................................................................26 Elemental carbon...................................................................................................................................28 Ethane ....................................................................................................................................................28 Methane .................................................................................................................................................28 Nitrogen..................................................................................................................................................................29 Reference materials and reporting of isotope ratios....................................................................................29 Ranges in isotopic composition....................................................................................................................29 Nitrate. ...................................................................................................................................................29 Nitrite. ....................................................................................................................................................30 Nitrogen oxide gases.............................................................................................................................30 Nitrogen gas..........................................................................................................................................30 iii Organic nitrogen....................................................................................................................................32 Nitrogen in rocks...................................................................................................................................34
Recommended publications
  • Package 'Ciaawconsensus'
    Package ‘CIAAWconsensus’ September 19, 2018 Type Package Title Isotope Ratio Meta-Analysis Version 1.3 Author Juris Meija and Antonio Possolo Maintainer Juris Meija <[email protected]> Description Calculation of consensus values for atomic weights, isotope amount ratios, and iso- topic abundances with the associated uncertainties using multivariate meta-regression ap- proach for consensus building. License Unlimited LazyData yes Imports mvtnorm, stringr, numDeriv, stats, Matrix NeedsCompilation no Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2018-09-19 13:30:12 UTC R topics documented: abundances2ratios . .2 at.weight . .3 ciaaw.mass.2003 . .4 ciaaw.mass.2012 . .5 ciaaw.mass.2016 . .6 iridium.data . .6 mmm ............................................7 normalize.ratios . .8 platinum.data . .9 Index 10 1 2 abundances2ratios abundances2ratios Isotope ratios of a chemical element from isotopic abundances Description This function calculates the isotope ratios of a chemical element from the given isotopic abundances and their uncertainties. The uncertainty evaluation is done using the propagation of uncertainty and the missing correlations between the isotopic abundances are reconstructed using Monte Carlo methods. Usage abundances2ratios(x, ux, ref=1, iterations=1e4) Arguments x A vector of isotopic abundances of an element ux Standard uncertainties of x ref Index to specify the desired reference isotope for isotope amount ratios iterations Number of iterations for isotopic abundance correlation mapping Details Situations are often encountered where isotopic abundances are reported but not the isotope ratios. In such cases we reconstruct the isotope ratios that are consistent with the abundances and their uncertainties. Given only the abundances and their uncertainties, for elements with four or more isotopes one cannot unambiguously infer the uncertainties of the ratios due to the unknown correla- tions between isotopic abundances.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorine Stable Isotopes in Sedimentary Systems: Does Size Matter?
    Chlorine stable isotopes in sedimentary systems: does size matter? Max Coleman Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA ABSTRACT: Stable isotope abundances vary because of size (atomic mass) differences. The chlorine stable isotope system was one of the first described theoretically, but had a slow, disappointment-strewn develop- ment, relative to other elements. Method improvement gave only small, but significant, differences (-1 %.) in compositions of geological materials. Eventually, brines and groundwater chlorides gave larger differences (-5%0). Physical processes like diffusion and adsorption, probably are the main controls of groundwater com- positions. In contrast, the processes producing brine compositions are still enigmatic and need further work for full understanding. Recent work on anthropogenic groundwater contaminants (chlorinated aliphatic hy- drocarbons and perchlorate) shows variations resulting from manufacturing processes; implying possibilities of tracing sources. However, they are subject to microbial degradation, producing much larger fractionations (115%0),but therefore offering better possibility of monitoring natural attenuation. So atomic size is important to give isotopic fractionation and the size of fractionation matters, allowing observation of otherwise unde- tectable processes. lecular and atomic weights by weighing the gases and relating them to the weight of hydrogen. All 1 INTRODUCTION atomic weights were integer multiples the weight of This paper aims to give a short and selective
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practice Guide for Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry, FIRMS (2011)
    Good Practice Guide for Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry Good Practice Guide for Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry First Edition 2011 Editors Dr Jim Carter, UK Vicki Barwick, UK Contributors Dr Jim Carter, UK Dr Claire Lock, UK Acknowledgements Prof Wolfram Meier-Augenstein, UK This Guide has been produced by Dr Helen Kemp, UK members of the Steering Group of the Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Dr Sabine Schneiders, Germany Spectrometry (FIRMS) Network. Dr Libby Stern, USA Acknowledgement of an individual does not indicate their agreement with Dr Gerard van der Peijl, Netherlands this Guide in its entirety. Production of this Guide was funded in part by the UK National Measurement System. This publication should be cited as: First edition 2011 J. F. Carter and V. J. Barwick (Eds), Good practice guide for isotope ratio mass spectrometry, FIRMS (2011). ISBN 978-0-948926-31-0 ISBN 978-0-948926-31-0 Copyright © 2011 Copyright of this document is vested in the members of the FIRMS Network. IRMS Guide 1st Ed. 2011 Preface A few decades ago, mass spectrometry (by which I mean organic MS) was considered a “black art”. Its complex and highly expensive instruments were maintained and operated by a few dedicated technicians and its output understood by only a few academics. Despite, or because, of this the data produced were amongst the “gold standard” of analytical science. In recent years a revolution occurred and MS became an affordable, easy to use and routine technique in many laboratories. Although many (rightly) applaud this popularisation, as a consequence the “black art” has been replaced by a “black box”: SAMPLES GO IN → → RESULTS COME OUT The user often has little comprehension of what goes on “under the hood” and, when “things go wrong”, the inexperienced operator can be unaware of why (or even that) the results that come out do not reflect the sample that goes in.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress and Challenges in Using Stable Isotopes to Trace Plant Carbon and Water Relations Across Scales
    Biogeosciences, 9, 3083–3111, 2012 www.biogeosciences.net/9/3083/2012/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bg-9-3083-2012 © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and water relations across scales C. Werner1,19, H. Schnyder2, M. Cuntz3, C. Keitel4, M. J. Zeeman5, T. E. Dawson6, F.-W. Badeck7, E. Brugnoli8, J. Ghashghaie9, T. E. E. Grams10, Z. E. Kayler11, M. Lakatos12, X. Lee13, C. Maguas´ 14, J. Ogee´ 15, K. G. Rascher1, R. T. W. Siegwolf16, S. Unger1, J. Welker17, L. Wingate18, and A. Gessler11 1Experimental and Systems Ecology, University Bielefeld, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany 2Lehrstuhl fur¨ Grunlandlehre,¨ Technische Universitat¨ Munchen,¨ 85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 3UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 4University of Sydney, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, 1 Central Avenue, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia 5College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 COAS Admin Bldg, Corvallis (OR), USA 6Center for Isotope Biogeochemistry, Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 7Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) PF 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany 8CNR – National Research Council of Italy – Institute of Agro-environmental and Forest Biology, via Marconi 2, 05010 Porano (TR), Italy 9Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Systematique´ et Evolution (ESE), CNRS AgroParisTech – UMR8079, Batimentˆ 362, Universite´ de Paris-Sud (XI), 91405 Orsay Cedex, France 10Ecophysiology of Plants, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universitat¨ Munchen,¨ Von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany 11Institute for Landscape Biogeochemistry Leibniz-Zentrum fur¨ Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V., Eberswalderstr.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties of Carbon the Atomic Element Carbon Has Very Diverse
    Properties of Carbon The atomic element carbon has very diverse physical and chemical properties due to the nature of its bonding and atomic arrangement. fig. 1 Allotropes of Carbon Some allotropes of carbon: (a) diamond, (b) graphite, (c) lonsdaleite, (d–f) fullerenes (C60, C540, C70), (g) amorphous carbon, and (h) carbon nanotube. Carbon has several allotropes, or different forms in which it can exist. These allotropes include graphite and diamond, whose properties span a range of extremes. Despite carbon's ability to make 4 bonds and its presence in many compounds, it is highly unreactive under normal conditions. Carbon exists in 2 main isotopes: 12C and 13C. There are many other known isotopes, but they tend to be short-lived and have extremely short half-lives. Allotropes The different forms of a chemical element. Cabon is the chemical element with the symbol C and atomic number 6. As a member of group 14 on the periodic table, it is nonmetallic and tetravalent—making four electrons available to form covalent chemical bonds. Carbon has 6 protons and 6 Source URL: https://www.boundless.com/chemistry/nonmetallic-elements/carbon/properties-carbon/ Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/courses/chem102#6.1 Attributed to: Boundless www.saylor.org Page 1 of 2 neutrons, and has a standard atomic weight of 12.0107 amu. Its electron configuration is denoted as 1s22s22p2. It is a solid, and sublimes at 3,642 °C. It's oxidation state ranges from 4 to -4, and it has an electronegativity rating of 2.55 on the Pauling scale. Carbon has several allotropes, or different forms in which it exists.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY of the BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' Iosfery)
    XA04N2887 INIS-XA-N--259 L.A. Pertsov TRANSLATED FROM RUSSIAN Published for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations L. A. PERTSOV THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' iosfery) Atomizdat NMoskva 1964 Translated from Russian Israel Program for Scientific Translations Jerusalem 1967 18 02 AEC-tr- 6714 Published Pursuant to an Agreement with THE U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. Copyright (D 1967 Israel Program for scientific Translations Ltd. IPST Cat. No. 1802 Translated and Edited by IPST Staff Printed in Jerusalem by S. Monison Available from the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Va. 22151 VI/ Table of Contents Introduction .1..................... Bibliography ...................................... 5 Chapter 1. GENESIS OF THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE ......................... 6 § Some historical problems...................... 6 § 2. Formation of natural radioactive isotopes of the earth ..... 7 §3. Radioactive isotope creation by cosmic radiation. ....... 11 §4. Distribution of radioactive isotopes in the earth ........ 12 § 5. The spread of radioactive isotopes over the earth's surface. ................................. 16 § 6. The cycle of natural radioactive isotopes in the biosphere. ................................ 18 Bibliography ................ .................. 22 Chapter 2. PHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES. ........... 24 § 1. The contribution of individual radioactive isotopes to the total radioactivity of the biosphere. ............... 24 § 2. Properties of radioactive isotopes not belonging to radio- active families . ............ I............ 27 § 3. Properties of radioactive isotopes of the radioactive families. ................................ 38 § 4. Properties of radioactive isotopes of rare-earth elements .
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Isotope Methods in Biological and Ecological Studies of Arthropods
    eea_572.fm Page 3 Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:17 PM DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00572.x Blackwell Publishing Ltd MINI REVIEW Stable isotope methods in biological and ecological studies of arthropods CORE Rebecca Hood-Nowotny1* & Bart G. J. Knols1,2 Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Wageningen University & Research Publications 1International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Agency’s Laboratories Seibersdorf, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria, 2Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands Accepted: 13 February 2007 Key words: marking, labelling, enrichment, natural abundance, resource turnover, 13-carbon, 15-nitrogen, 18-oxygen, deuterium, mass spectrometry Abstract This is an eclectic review and analysis of contemporary and promising stable isotope methodologies to study the biology and ecology of arthropods. It is augmented with literature from other disciplines, indicative of the potential for knowledge transfer. It is demonstrated that stable isotopes can be used to understand fundamental processes in the biology and ecology of arthropods, which range from nutrition and resource allocation to dispersal, food-web structure, predation, etc. It is concluded that falling costs and reduced complexity of isotope analysis, besides the emergence of new analytical methods, are likely to improve access to isotope technology for arthropod studies still further. Stable isotopes pose no environmental threat and do not change the chemistry or biology of the target organism or system. These therefore represent ideal tracers for field and ecophysiological studies, thereby avoiding reductionist experimentation and encouraging more holistic approaches. Con- sidering (i) the ease with which insects and other arthropods can be marked, (ii) minimal impact of the label on their behaviour, physiology, and ecology, and (iii) environmental safety, we advocate more widespread application of stable isotope technology in arthropod studies and present a variety of potential uses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dole Effect and Its Variations During the Last 130,000 Years As Measured in the Vostok Ice Core
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, VOL. 8, NO. 3, PAGES 363-376, SEPTEMBER 1994 The Dole effect and its variations during the last 130,000 years as measured in the Vostok ice core Michael Bender • and Todd Sowers 2 GraduateSchool of Oceanography,University of RhodeIsland, Kingston Laurent Labeyrie Centredes Faibles Radioactivites, Centre National de la RechercheScientifique, Commissariat a L'EnergieAtomique, Gif-sur- Yvette, France Abstract. We review the currentunderstanding of the Dole effect (the observeddifference between the •5180of atmospheric0 2 andthat of seawater)and its causes, extend the record of variationsin theDole effectback to 130kyr before present using data on the •5180 of 0 2obtained from studying the Vostok ice core(Sowers et al., 1993), anddiscuss the significanceof temporalvariations. The Dole effectreflects oxygenisotope fractionation during photosynthesis, respiration, and hydrologic processes (evaporation, precipitation,and evapotranspiration). Our bestprediction of the present-dayDole effect,+20.8 %0,is considerablylower thanthe observedvalue, + 23.5 %0,and we discusspossible causes of this discrepancy. During the past 130 kyr, the Dole effecthas been 0.05 %0lower thanthe present value, on average.The standarddeviation of the Dole effect from the meanhas been only _+0.2 %0,and the Dole effect is nearly unchangedbetween glacial maxima and interglacial periods. The smallvariability in theDole effect suggeststhat relative rates of primaryproduction in theland and marine realms have been relatively constant.Most periodicvariability in the Dole effectis in the precessionband, suggesting that changes in thisglobal biogeochemical term reflects variations in low-latitudeland hydrology and productivity or possiblyvariability in low-latitudeoceanic productivity. Introduction they can potentially be made to do so. Ice core reconstructionsof the concentrationsof bioactivegases in air Our understanding of the response of the biosphere to provide an integratedglobal signal which complementsthe Pleistoceneclimate change is actually quite limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Isotropic Tracers of Natural Gas and Formation Waters in Fractured Shales
    Chemical and isotopic tracers of natural gas and formation waters in Note: this document may contain some elements that are not fully fractured shales accessible to users with disabilities. If you need assistance accessing any information in this document, please contact [email protected]. Jennifer McIntosh, Melissa Schlegel, Brittney Bates Department of Hydrology & Water Resources University of Arizona, Tucson AZ EPA Technical Workshop Feb 24-25, 2011 Outline of Presentation 1)) What is the chemical and isotoppgic signature of formation waters and natural gas in fractured shales? 2) How does it compare with shallow drift aquifers, coalbeds, and other deep geologic formations? Illinois Basin-Case Study - 3 organic-rich formations: glacial drift, Penn. coal, & Dev. fractured shale - organicorganic-rich Ordov. ShaleShale, not part ooff this study m 500 20 km Schlegel et al. (in press, 2011, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta) Illinois Basin-Case Study - microbial methane in all 3 units - thermogenic methane in shale and coal m 500 20 km Schlegel et al. (in press, 2011, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta) Illinois Basin - water & gas samples Shallow aquifers Penn. Coals Dev. Shale Limestone aquifers 9New data (white symbols): Schlegel et al. (in press) 9Previous data (black symbols): McIntosh et al., 2002; Strąpoć et al., 2007, 2008a,b; Coleman et al, 1988 Fingerprint of natural gases 1000000 Shallow Aquifers 100000 High C1/C2, no C3 Coals 10000 1000 Shale 100 10 Shallow aquifers Penn. Coals Dev. Shale Thermogenic gas 1 -80 -75 -70 -65 -60 -55 -50 -45 -40 13 δ CCH4 (ä PDB) 13 9In general, 3 organic-rich units have different gas compositions (C1/C2+C3) and δ C-CH4 values.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Determination of Boron Isotope Ratio in Boron Trifluoride By
    applied sciences Article Online Determination of Boron Isotope Ratio in Boron Trifluoride by Infrared Spectroscopy Weijiang Zhang, Yin Tang and Jiao Xu * School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (Y.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-022-27402028 Received: 17 September 2018; Accepted: 3 December 2018; Published: 6 December 2018 Abstract: Enriched boron-10 and its related compounds have great application prospects, especially in the nuclear industry. The chemical exchange rectification method is one of the most important ways to separate the 10B and 11B isotope. However, a real-time monitoring method is needed because this separation process is difficult to characterize. Infrared spectroscopy was applied in the separation device to realize the online determination of the boron isotope ratio in boron trifluoride (BF3). The possibility of determining the isotope ratio via the 2ν3 band was explored. A correction factor was introduced to eliminate the difference between the ratio of peak areas and the true value of the boron isotope ratio. It was experimentally found that the influences of pressure and temperature could be ignored. The results showed that the infrared method has enough precision and stability for real-time, in situ determination of the boron isotope ratio. The instability point of the isotope ratio can be detected with the assistance of the online determination method and provides a reference for the production of boron isotope. Keywords: isotope; boron; infrared spectroscopy; online determination 1. Introduction Boron in naturally occurring compounds is composed of two isotopes, one of mass 10 and the other of mass 11.
    [Show full text]
  • F:\Forensic Geology\Ice Man Isotopes.Wpd
    NAME 89.215 - FORENSIC GEOLOGY DEMISE OF THE ICE MAN - ISOTOPIC EVIDENCE I. Introduction Stable and radiogenic isotopic data have been used in a variety of fields to answer a wide range of scientific questions. The nucleus of an atom consists of protons (+1 charge) and neutrons (0 charge), two types of particles that have essentially the same atomic mass. The number of protons in a nucleus determines the element. For example, a nucleus with 1 proton is a hydrogen nucleus, a nucleus with 2 protons is a helium nucleus. Isotopes of an element contain the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons. For example, there are three isotopes of hydrogen: (1) ordinary hydrogen which contains one proton and no neutrons and has an atomic mass of one; (2) deuterium which contains one proton and one neutron and has an atomic mass of two; and (3) tritium which contains one proton and two neutrons and has an atomic mass of three. The convention used to show the numbers of types of particles in a nucleus is to place the number of protons (called the atomic number) at the bottom left of the element symbol and the number of protons plus neutrons (called the atomic mass) at the upper left of the element symbol. For example, the tritium isotope is 3 shown as 1H . II. Stable isotopes Stable isotopes are not radioactive, they do not spontaneously breakdown to other atoms. In a previous exercise you used radioactive carbon to determine when the Ice Man was killed. There are three isotopes of carbon: (1) carbon 12 which contains 6 protons and 6 neutrons giving an atomic mass of 12; (2) carbon 13 which contains 6 protons and 7 neutrons giving an atomic mass of 13; and (3) carbon 14 which contains 6 protons and 8 neutrons giving an atomic mass of 14.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Natural Isotopes of Elements Other Than H, C, O
    12 NATURAL ISOTOPES OF ELEMENTS OTHER THAN H, C, O In this chapter we are dealing with the less common applications of natural isotopes. Our discussions will be restricted to their origin and isotopic abundances and the main characteristics. Only brief indications are given about possible applications. More details are presented in the other volumes of this series. A few isotopes are mentioned only briefly, as they are of little relevance to water studies. Based on their half-life, the isotopes concerned can be subdivided: 1) stable isotopes of some elements (He, Li, B, N, S, Cl), of which the abundance variations point to certain geochemical and hydrogeological processes, and which can be applied as tracers in the hydrological systems, 2) radioactive isotopes with half-lives exceeding the age of the universe (232Th, 235U, 238U), 3) radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives, mainly daughter nuclides of the previous catagory of isotopes, 4) radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives that are of cosmogenic origin, i.e. that are being produced in the atmosphere by interactions of cosmic radiation particles with atmospheric molecules (7Be, 10Be, 26Al, 32Si, 36Cl, 36Ar, 39Ar, 81Kr, 85Kr, 129I) (Lal and Peters, 1967). The isotopes can also be distinguished by their chemical characteristics: 1) the isotopes of noble gases (He, Ar, Kr) play an important role, because of their solubility in water and because of their chemically inert and thus conservative character. Table 12.1 gives the solubility values in water (data from Benson and Krause, 1976); the table also contains the atmospheric concentrations (Andrews, 1992: error in his Eq.4, where Ti/(T1) should read (Ti/T)1); 2) another category consists of the isotopes of elements that are only slightly soluble and have very low concentrations in water under moderate conditions (Be, Al).
    [Show full text]