Educationinnovation2015.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Edited by: Michael Thoennessen, Michigan State University, and Graham Peaslee, Hope College Layout and design: Erin O’Donnell, NSCL, Michigan State University Front cover: Photograph of lead-tungstate scintillator crystals in a support frame for the Primakoff Experiment (PrimEx) in Hall B at Jefferson Lab. Preamble 3 1 Executive Summary 5 2 Education and Workforce 9 2.1 Workforce Development 9 2.2 Graduate and Postgraduate Education 19 2.3 Undergraduate Education 27 2.4 Outreach and K12 37 3 Innovation 43 3.1 Defense and Security 46 3.2 Energy and Climate 49 3.3 Health and Medicine 54 3.4 Art, Forensic, and other Applications 61 Appendix A: Town Meeting Program 72 Appendix B: Town Meeting Attendees 76 Appendix C: Presentation Abstracts 78 Appendix D: Examples of Outreach Activities 135 Ed Hartouni (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Anna Hayes (Los Alamos National Laboratory) Calvin Howell (Duke University) Cynthia Keppel (Jefferson Lab) Micha Kilburn (University of Notre Dame) Amy McCausey (Michigan State University, conference coordinator) Graham Peaslee (Hope College, co-convener) David Robertson (University of Missouri) Gunther Roland (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Mike Snow (Indiana University) Michael Thoennessen (Michigan State University, co-convener) The town meeting was supported by the Division of Nuclear Physics and the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory. We would like to thank Kandice Carter, Jolie Cizewski, Micha Kilburn, Peggy Norris, Erich Ormand, and Warren Rogers for suggestions, proof reading, data compilation, collecting the examples of outreach activities. The DNP NSAC Long Range Plan Town Meeting on Education and Innovation was held August 6–8, 2014 on the campus of Michigan State University in East Lansing, MI. It was one of four town meetings held in preparation for the 2015 NSAC Long Range Plan. While the other three town meetings concentrated on specific scientific subfields of nuclear science the Town Meeting on Education and Innovation covered topics relevant to all of nuclear science. This was the first time an official dedicated Town Meeting on Education and Innovation was held as part of the long range planning process. The town meeting follows a long tradition within the nuclear science community to solicit ideas and initiatives from the community itself. For the 2002 long range plan a working group on education contributed to the town meeting on nuclear structure and astrophysics. In preparation for the 2007 long range plan a community driven self- organized workshop entitled “Vision for Education and Outreach in Nuclear Science” developed recommendations which were included in a white paper submitted to NSAC. In another workshop on “Enhancing American Competitiveness through Basic Research”, recommendations on innovative applications of nuclear physics were summarized in a white paper submitted to NSAC. These white papers were quite influential in demonstrating the importance of education, outreach and applications in the final long range plan. The present white paper will again serve as input to the next NSAC Long Range Plan. It highlights recent successes and new initiatives and makes specific recommendations for further advances and improvements. This white paper represents the activities, initiatives and innovative approaches presented and discussed at the town meeting. It does not claim to be a comprehensive report of all education and outreach activities in the community, nor a comprehensive review of all applications of nuclear science. The topics of education and innovation were combined in a single town meeting because they are closely linked, representing the connection between basic nuclear science and society. About 80% of the students earning a PhD in nuclear science enter the workforce in a wide range of different fields from medicine to homeland security, while only 20% continue in fundamental research in nuclear science. At the same time, the potential for innovative practical applications, such as medicine, defense, and energy attract the best young students into nuclear science. Thus, not only does education enable creative innovations in nuclear science; these innovative applications also provide inspiration that draws students into the field to be educated. This report emphasizes the important connection between the role of education in creating future innovations in both fundamental and applied nuclear science, and the role of these applications in attracting new students into the nuclear science workforce. The town meeting was held prior to the other three DNP scientific town meetings, so that the outcomes could be shared and discussed with everyone at these other town meetings who were not able to participate in this first meeting. The recommendations which were drafted as the outcome of the town meeting were presented to members of the whole community at the other town meetings and in a general session at the Joint Meeting of the APS Division of Nuclear Physics and the Physical Society of Japan in October 2014. The recommendations were modified to reflect the best sentiment expressed by the majority of the community. Before and during the Education and Innovation town meeting, input was solicited from the whole community and contributors were asked to address the following five questions in their presentations: . What problem do you address or try to solve? . What specifically is the role of nuclear physics? . What are presently the biggest impediments? . What resources do you require in the future? . What is your overall vision to solve the issue in the future? The meeting consisted of a joint plenary session on workforce development and four parallel sessions on education (graduate, undergraduate, K-12, and outreach) and innovation (defense & security, energy & climate, medicine & health, and art & forensics). The program of the meeting is included in Appendix A. The meeting itself was attended by 54 scientists with another 18 researchers contributing presentations or participating via webinar. One contribution was presented remotely via webinar. The participants represented 39 different institutions and organizations and the list of participants is provided in Appendix B. A short abstract from each of the presenters was collected after the meeting and is included in Appendix C. A special appeal to collect current nuclear science outreach activities after the meeting yielded the 50 examples shown in Appendix D. Nuclear science is an exciting fundamental discipline that spans all dimensions from the study of the nature of neutrinos to astrophysical objects in the universe. Scientific results of these fundamental studies and the techniques and tools developed for them have a significant impact on society. The future success of the field depends in part on the education of the next generation of outstanding scientists and the continued development of innovative applications for society. The nuclear science community must continue to attract the best and brightest students. These students are eager and motivated to enter and to contribute to the most exciting fields of science. They are looking for opportunities to discover new phenomena, to explore areas that no one has studied before, and to develop new instruments and devices that help solve some of today’s major societal problems. Traditionally, the nuclear science community has been very good at offering exciting research opportunities to students which has been greatly facilitated by long range plans. In these plans, coherent long-term strategies for the field are developed which enables optimal scientific use of existing accelerator facilities, while at the same time planning for the construction of next generation facilities. The most recent example of this successful approach to planning is the current construction of the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB). This and other major initiatives demonstrate the continuing vitality of the field, which inspires and motivates students as they clearly see the exciting long-term research opportunities available to them. The major funding support for students in nuclear science is provided by federal research grants. The research budgets have to be carefully balanced with the funding for the operation of existing facilities and the construction and development of future accelerators and experimental equipment. The level of research funding directly impacts the education of the students and thus strong support is essential for the overall future of the nuclear science. Once the students enter the field, it is the responsibility of the nuclear science community to offer them an excellent education, and to provide opportunities for them to grow as scientists. These efforts should not be limited towards careers in basic science. During their time in graduate school, students develop many different strengths and interests and their education in nuclear science prepares them for a wide variety of different career opportunities. Although basic nuclear science is not the only contributor for the overall workforce in nuclear-related industries, well-educated scientists with a solid understanding of nuclear science and related skills continue to be offered excellent jobs in these industries. The importance of education and innovation has been stressed in all previous long range plans, beginning in 1979. Based on the observations and recommendations of these long range plans, the funding agencies and the overall community have developed and established