Insights from 4Msr (Binjor), an Indus (Harappan)

Home , Banawali, Binjor, Hulas, Kanmer, Kot Diji, Oriyo timbo

DATING ADOPTION AND INTENSIFICATION OF FOOD-CROPS: INSIGHTS FROM 4MSR (BINJOR), AN INDUS (HARAPPAN) SITE IN NORTHWESTERN INDIA Shalini Sharma1,4 • Sanjay Kumar Manjul2 • Arvin Manjul3 • Puran Chand Pande4 • Anil K Pokharia1*

1Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, 53 University Road, Lucknow 226007, Uttar Pradesh, India 2Archaeological Survey of India, 24 Tilak Marg, New Delhi 110001, India 3Excavation Branch-II, Archaeological Survey of India, Purana Quila, Delhi 110003, India 4Kumaun University, D.S.B. Campus, Nainital 263001, Uttarakhand, India

ABSTRACT. Here we present direct dates of food grains and insights into agricultural strategies adopted by Harappans from a newly excavated Indus site 4MSR (Binjor) in northwestern India. The site revealed Early and Mature Harappan phases delimited by a Transitional phase based on ceramics and archaeological artifacts. The macro-botanical remains revealed that the site was occupied by an agricultural society during the Early phase (~2900−2600 BCE), whereas diversification of the economy including more craft specialization, along with an agricultural advancement was witnessed during the Mature phase (~2500−1800 BCE). The advent of summer crops during the Transitional phase (~2600−2500 BCE) indicates climate amelioration attributed to inception of strong Indian Summer Monsoon (ISM). By the end of Mature phase, millet was recorded due to a change in climatic (relatively lower moisture) conditions or drying of the river channel, which forced the settlers to shift the cropping (agricultural) strategy in the region. Plausibly, this unavailability of water during the end of Mature phase led the settlers to abandon the site in order to migrate somewhere else. The subsistence pattern indicates continuity and change in temporal domain likely owing to changing climatic/environmental conditions, resources and knowledge gained by exchange/trade of cultures over a time period between ~2900 BCE to 1800 BCE.

KEYWORDS: Ghaggar-Hakra River channel, Holocene climate, Indian Summer Monsoon (ISM), Indus agriculture, Indus civilization.

INTRODUCTION The Indus Valley Civilization (IVC), one of the world’s oldest urban civilizations, thrived between ~3300–1500 BCE, in the northwestern region of the Indian subcontinent (mainly present-day northwestern India and Pakistan) (Kenoyer 1991a; Possehl 2002; Weber et al. 2010). The civilization spread across the Indus River basin, with a complex material culture (Marshall 1931; Bhan et al. 2002; Possehl 2002; Shinde 2016). A large number of sites stretching from the Himalayan foothills in the east, Kashmir in the north, to Maharashtra in the south and Baluchistan in the west (Possehl 1999) have been discovered. They cover a wide range of environmental conditions, including several modern eco-zones, riverine system and two distinct rainfall systems, namely the winter westerlies and the Indian summer monsoon. The Indus Valley Civilization was dependent on agricultural activities, but later on developed as an urban culture sustained by surplus agricultural production and trade with Mesopotamia and other contemporary civilizations (Levey and Burkey 1959). A number of Indus/Harappan sites viz., Harappa, Miri-Qalat, Kunal, Rohira, Sanghol, Balu, Banawali, Masudpur, Rojdi, Rangpur, Babar-Kot, OriyoTimbo, Shikarpur, Surkotada, Khirsara and Kanmer have been excavated. These sites yielded food grains to understand the questions related to agricultural strategies and the use of plants as food by the Indus farmers in different ecological conditions (Wheeler 1947;Vats1974; Saraswat 1986, 1992, 1995;Costantini1990; Weber 1991, 1999; Chanchala 1994;Reddy1994; Tengberg 1999; Saraswat and Pokharia 2002, 2003;Fuller2006; Pokharia et al. 2011, 2014, 2017; García-Granero et al. 2015;Bates and Petrie 2016;Petrieetal.2016). Moreover, the archaeobotanical data have been used to explore aspects related to fuel (Lancelotti 2010; Lancelotti et al. 2017), material culture (Kenoyer 1994; Lancelotti 2010, Lancelotti et al. 2017), nature of social organization (Weber et al. 2010;Petrieetal.2017) and culture-climate-subsistence relationship (Madella and Fuller

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

2006; Weber et al. 2010; Farooqui et al. 2013; Pokharia et al. 2011, 2014, 2017). Harappa, with a remarkable evidence of urbanization, has also demonstrated the role of craft technologies that formed the bases for later technology used in south Asia, providing evidence for ways in which the Indus Valley Civilization contributed to the development of technologies and urban strategies significant for global history (Kenoyer 2010).

Here, we present the results of macro-botanical remains quantitatively from the Early phase to the Mature phase. To glean the information about agricultural strategies in different ecological conditions the comparative analysis of crop economy between present and other studied Indus sites has also been taken into consideration. The archaeobotanical results from the site will provide additional information to understand the role of climate and ecology for the agricultural production of the Indus settlements with respect to peripheral and core zones.

GEOLOGY AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND The archaeological site 4MSR (29º12 024.48"N, 73º09 020.16"E), is situated on dry alluvial bed of paleo Ghaggar-Hakra River channel in western Rajasthan (Figure 1). This relict channel is thought to have catered several pre-historic phases of human civilizations in northwestern India. Modern satellite imagery also indicates the existence of a continuous river channel system in northwestern region, along which several records of human settlements of the Indus culture have been unearthed. A large number of furnaces and hearths with ash have been unearthed at the site during course of excavations. Artifacts of gold and copper, shells and terracotta were also recovered from the site. Beads of different shapes and designs made of semiprecious stones with assemblage of ceramic ware have also been recorded. Weights of varying sizes made up of chert and shell, along with the artifacts representing cultural advancement viz., seals, fragments of gold beads, miniature beakers (probably used for measuring liquids) indicate that the site was used for an industrial purpose. The findings at 4MSR place it as an important “habitation or industrial settlement” which shows a major industrial activity along with domestic hearths recovered from the cultural layers in Harappan context.

MATERIAL AND METHODS Macro-Botanical Remains: Collection, Sorting and Analysis Macro-botanical remains consist of plant traces that are large enough to be recognized (Fritz 2005) with the naked eye or low-powered microscope (Ford 1979; Pearsall 2000). The macro-botanical samples were collected by the water floatation technique (using the principle of density difference between inorganic and organic material) during course of excavation. All buoyant carbonized botanical material was sieved through a 30 mesh (0.5 mm) geological sieve. In all 199 macrobotanical samples were collected by floating 7122 L (990l from Early phase, 1825l from Transitional phase and 4307l from Mature phase levels) of soil systematically from cultural contexts (floor, hearths, pits; Figures S1, S2, S3). However, only 156 samples yielded the macro-remains (Table S1). The carbonized macro-remains were segregated from the mixture containing other modern biological material and charcoal pieces under a stereo binocular microscope (Leica EZ4). Segregated samples were sorted, identified and photo-documented by Leica Z6APO (Figures 2Aand2B). The plant taxa were identified on the basis of morphological details preserved in the carbonized grains/seeds up to species level by comparing them with the corresponding parts of the extant plants of the

Figure 1 (A) Map showing the location of the archaeological study site 4MSR (in yellow), Rajasthan along with other Indus site in the region of north-western India (in red) and Pakistan (in green). Map created via software ArcGIS (version# 10.3). (B) Aerial view of the site 4MSR surrounded by wheat fields. (C) Excavated “key trenches” on the mound showing locations of the Early and Mature Harappan Phase. (Please see electronic version for color figures.)

same taxa and other identification reference material (Martin and Barkley 1961;Pokhariaetal. 2011;Fuller2018). Absolute counts of plant taxa, ubiquity (Popper 1988)andDiversityIndex (DI) or Shannon-Weaver Index (Pearsall 2000) were used to statistically analyze the data (Figure 3A, B and Table S2). The relative abundance of economic crops was also standardized as densities (Weber 1999) across all phases by dividing the total number of samples by the volume of sediment floated (Figure 3C, Table S3).

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Auckland University of Technology, on 02 Jun 2020 at 15:29:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.37 Figure 2 (A) Charred crop remains recovered from the cultural layers of archaeological site 4MSR (Binjor), Rajasthan: (1) Hordeum vulgare (dorsal); (2) Hordeum vulgare (ventral); (3) Triticum aestivum/ durum (dorsal); (4) Triticum aestivum/durum (ventral); (5) Triticum dicoccum (dorsal & ventral); (6) Triticum sphaerococcum (dorsal and ventral); (7) Oryza cf. sativa; (8) Setaria sp.; (9) Lathyrus sativus; (10) Lens culinaris; (11) Vigna mungo/radiata; (12) Cicer arietinum; (13) Pisumarvense; (14) Gossypium sp.; (15) Linum usitatissimum; (16) Sesamum indicum; (17) Juglans regia; (18) Vitis sp. (B) Charred weeds and wild taxa remains recovered from the cultural layers of archaeological site 4MSR. (1) Vicia sativa; (2) Vicia hirsuta; (3) Acacia sp.; (4) Medicago sativa; (5) Lespedeza sp.; (6) Scirpus sp.; (7) Polygonum sp.; (8) Cyperaceae; (9) Rumex dentatus; (10) Chenopodium album; (11) Scleria sp.; (12) Aegilops sp.; (13) Andropogon sp.; (14) Desmodium sp.; (15) Phyllanthus sp.; (16) Trianthema sp.; (17) Ziziphus nummularia.

Figure 2 (Continued)

Radiocarbon Dating In order to understand the chronology of the archaeological site, 14C dating of different habitational layers (charcoal and sediment) and carbonized grains was carried out by conventional beta counting liquid scintillation counter (LSC) and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiometric dating methods (Table 1). The LSC radiometric dating of the charcoal samples was carried out at the 14C laboratory of the Birbal Sahni Institute of

Figure 3 (A) Histogram showing comparative account of absolute count of recovered crop taxa. (B) Bar chart showing the increasing trend of the diversity index of crops and weeds taxa from different phases at 4MSR, Rajasthan. (C) Density of crop taxa per 10 L of soil sediment.

Palaeosciences (Lab code BS-), Lucknow, India, while sediment and carbonized grain samples were dated at the Institute of Physics, Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory (Lab code GdA-), Poland. Radiocarbon ages were determined from the 14C/12C ratios after normalizing carbon isotopic fractionation measured by δ13C = −25.0‰ (Stuiver and Polach 1977) and then calibrated with the probability method of Calib 7.04 (Stuiver and Reimer 1993) using the IntCal13 data set (Reimer et al. 2013). The radiocarbon dates confirm the age of the cultural sequence, along with the ceramic and artifact assemblage recovered at the site.

RESULTS Chronology of the site 4MSR 14C ages of cultural layers, including charcoal, soil-sediment and carbonized grains (barley, wheat and rice) indicate the site was occupied from the Early Harappan phase until the termination of Mature phase (Figure 4B and Table 1). A Bayesian model of the obtained dates has been created using the Sequence and Boundary functions of OxCal v4.3.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2017) using the IntCal13 calibration curve (Reimer et al. 2013). Figure 4A shows the complete stratigraphy and chronological details, based on the radiometric dates acquired from different trenches across the site, as each of these trenches represents a discrete archaeological phase where stratigraphic continuity of the samples could be maintained, these phases could be placed broadly relative to one another in the chronological model. Due to their out of sequence distributions and long tails, there was poor agreement for the LSC charcoal samples BS-3990 and BS-3987. Modeled boundaries for

14 . . Auckland University of Technology, on 02 Jun 2020 at 15:29:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms use,

https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.37 Table 1 AMS and LSC C dates of charcoal, carbonized grains and sediment samples from the archaeological site 4MSR, dated at the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences (lab code BS-) in Lucknow, India, and the Institute of Physics, Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory (lab code GdA-) in Poland (68.2% probability). Archaeological context 14C date Calibrated age (BCE) Calibrated age (BP) Cultural Trench Depth (msl) Lab code Sample type (yr BP) (with 1σ uncertainty) (with 1σ uncertainty) phase N00 157.40 BS-3987 Charcoal 3500±100 1950−1690 3900−3640 Mature N00 157.32 GdA-4273 Wheat 3775±25 2280−2140 4220−4090 N00 157.21 GdA-4805 Rice 3835±30 2340−2210 4290−4160 N10E10 156.47 BS-3990 Charcoal 3710±100 2280−1960 4230−3900 Transitional N10W20 154.90 GdA-4806 Barley 4045±30 2620−2490 4570−4440 N60E10 153.37 GdA-4809 Sediment 4055±30 2840−2480 4790−4430 Early N60E10 153.15 GdA-4807 Barley 4065±30 2830−2500 4780−4450 Crops Food of Adoption Dating N60E10 152.72 GdA-4808 Sediment 4185±30 2880−2700 4830−4650 7 8 S Sharma et al.

Figure 4 (A) Stratigraphy at the site 4MSR showing chronology from the Early Harappan phase to the Mature phase. (B) Bayesian model created by using OxCal v4.3.2 atmospheric curve between calibrated radiocarbon ages and mean above sea level (masl).

the beginning of the Early phase at the site ranged 2880−2700BCE (GdA-4808; 1σ), the beginning of the Transitional phase 2620−2490 BCE (GdA-4806; 1σ) and the start of the Mature phase at 2340−2210 BCE (GdA-4805; 1σ) and termination of occupation is 1950−1690 BCE (BS-3987; 1σ). The 1σ (one sigma) ranges were favored due to the overlap of the long tails on some of the modeled distributions. Based on 14C dating and artifacts recovered from the site, we present overall chronology of the site in a three broad phases: Early phase ca. 2900−2600 BCE (period 2, Kot Diji phase); Transitional phase 2600−2500 BCE (period 3A, initial) and Mature phase 2500−1800 BCE (period 3B and 3C, final) based on Indus tradition chronology at Harappa (Kenoyer 1991b).The termination of the occupation 1800 BCE is not based on the actual dated material, hence the end of the occupation favored is given as the modeled end date. However, the main occupational phases Early, Transitional, and Mature are based on the dated carbonized grains for e.g. barley from the Early phase dated back to ~2830−2500 BCE (GdA-4807), and from the Transitional phase dated back to ~2620−2490 BCE (GdA-4806) (Table 1). Remarkably, the single date of rice from 4MSR dates to ~2340−2210 BCE (GdA-4805; Table 1) which is analogous to ~2430−2140 BCE dated from another Indus site Masudpur I (Haryana) (Petrie et al. 2016).

Quantifying Agricultural Production and Intensification The macro-botanical assemblage revealed (Table S1) the occurrence of cultivated plants characterized by cereals and leguminous crops viz., Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum/durum,

Figure 5 Pie charts showing the relative proportion of summer and winter crops at 4MSR, Rajasthan.

Triticum sphaerococcum, Triticum dicoccum, Oryza sativa, Pisum arvense, Lens culinaris, Cicer arietinum, Lathyrus sp. and Vigna sp. Besides, oleiferous and fibrous crops such as Sesamum indicum, Linum usitatissimum and Gossypium sp. have also been recorded. Horticultural crops like Vitis sp. and Juglans regia were also found (Figure 2A). The presence of ruderal weeds and wild taxa has also been noticed in association with agricultural crop assemblage (Figure 2B. During the Early phase (~2900−2600 BCE) the winter crops (98%) (Figure 5)are represented by the Hordeum vulgare (77%) and Triticum sp. (5%), along with winter season pulses like Pisum arvense (6%), Lens culinaris (6%), Lathyrus sp. (4%) and insignificant summer crops (2%) viz., Vigna sp. and Gossypium sp.

The crop economy during the Transitional phase (~2600−2500 BCE) is witnessed by winter (83%) and summer (17%) season crops (Figure 5). A uni-seasonal (winter) cropping strategy was gradually modified into the double-cropping system based on winter (Hordeum vulgare, 60%; Triticum sp., 12%; Pisum arvense,5%;Lens culinaris, 1% and Lathyrus sp., 2%; Linum usitatissimum, 3%) and summer (Oryza sativa, <1%; Setaria sp., 1%; Vigna sp., 3%; Gossypium sp., 11% and Sesamum indicum, 2%) crops. The abundance of cotton seeds during this phase are noted. The presence of summer crops (17%) during the Transitional phase suggests the inception of strong Indian Summer Monsoon (ISM). However, the intensification and diversification of the agricultural production has been observed during the Mature phase (~2500−1800 BCE) and can be attributed to favorable mainly winter and summer precipitation. The agricultural strategy seems fully developed and might have provided the production of surplus food for the settlers throughout the year. The summer crops accounted for 43% and winter crops 57%. The occurrence of Juglans regia (3%), native of temperate region, indicates trade contacts with far distant culture during this time period. The estimated diversity index (DI) or Shannon-Weaver index (Pearsall 2000) of the plants during the Early, Transitional and Mature phases also corroborates the macro- botanical assemblage found at 4MSR represented by 0.7<0.9<1.0 respectively (Figure 3B; Table S2). The density has also been calculated for the cereals, pulses, oil and fiber crops and fruits per 10 L of soil floated (Figure 3C), thus surmising maximum diversity during the Mature Phase. The agricultural crop requirements (modern scenario) of Indus crop assemblage grown at 4MSR can be understood from the adapted Table 2.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Auckland University of Technology, on 02 Jun 2020 at 15:29:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.37 available at Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms 10 https://www.cambridge.org/core hrae al. et Sharma S

Table 2 Agricultural crop requirements of Indus crop assemblage recorded at 4MSR. Adapted from different sources viz. Handbook of Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi (Anonymous 2006); Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Water Needs, F.A.O., United Nations, Italy (Brouwer and Heibloem, 1986); USDA (2020) plants database; and Petrie and Bates (2017). (Abbreviations: W/ R=Winter/Rabi; S/K=Summer/Kharif; P=Perennial.) Total growing Amount of Growing Sowing period precipitation . . Auckland University of Technology, on 02 Jun 2020 at 15:29:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms use, https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.37 Agricultural crop Crop type Origin season (month) (days) required (mm) Soil requirement Hordeum vulgare Cereal Near East and W/R Oct–Nov 120–155 500–1000 Well drained fertile (barley) Mediterranean loam/light-clay soil region Triticum sp. (wheat) Cereal Near East and W/R Nov 120–145 750–900 Well drained loams & Mediterranean clayey loams/sandy region loams Oryza sativa (rice) Cereal India/China S/K Jun–Jul 90–150 1500–2000 Heavy neutral soil (clay/clay loam/loamy) Setaria sp. (foxtail Minor cereal China S/K Jun–Jul 60–120 300–700 Sandy to loamy soil millet) Pisum arvense (pea) Leguminous Europe and W/R Dec–Jan 90–100 800–1200 Deep loamy soil western Asia Lens culinaris Leguminous Near East and W/R Oct–Nov 150–170 600–1200 Light loamy sand to (lentil) Mediterranean heavy clay soil region Vigna sp. (green/ Leguminous India S/K Jun–Aug 75–90 300–400 Sandy to heavy black gram) loam soil Cicer arietinum Leguminous Near East and W/R Oct–Nov 100–180 500–1800 Heavy clay to light (chickpea) Mediterranean loam region available at Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Lathyrus sativus Leguminous Southern Europe W/R Sep–Oct 60–70 400–650 Loamy/sandy-loam https://www.cambridge.org/core (grass pea) and Western soil Asia Gossypium sp. Oil & fiber India S/K Jun–Jul 180–195 700–1300 Well drained deep (cotton) alluvial soil to black clayey soil Linum usitatissimum Oil & fiber Near East and W/R Oct–Nov 150–220 700–750 Well drained, fertile, (linseed) Mediterranean medium & heavy region soil . . Auckland University of Technology, on 02 Jun 2020 at 15:29:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms use, https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.37 Sesamum indicum Oil & fiber India S/K Jun–Jul 90–120 500–700 Sandy loam to heavy (sesame) black soil Vitis sp. (grape) Fruits Mediterranean PMay–Jun 4–6 yr and 20 300–1450 Deep well drained region and (blooming) yr loamy soil Central Asia (to flower) Juglansregia Fruits Mediterranean PMay–Jun 40–80 700–850 Deep well drained (walnut) region and (blooming) (after bud loamy, medium Central Asia break) moisture, soil aigAoto fFo Crops Food of Adoption Dating 11 12 S Sharma et al.

DISCUSSION Archaeological Context: Architecture and Ceramic Data Early Harappan Phase (~2900−2600 BCE) The excavations at lower levels of trenches (N60E10, S30W50, N30W10, N30W20, S30W50, S20W10, N10E00, S10E10, S30W40; Supplementary Table 1) revealed the Early phase of Indus civilization which was not characterized by any citadel complex or town planning. The ceramic assemblage found from this phase was mainly dominated by Hakra, Sothi and Kot Dijian elements indicating cultural contacts during the Early phase of Indus. The ceramics were beautifully painted with figures of a peacock and other birds, and a lion (or an animal of family Felidae), as well as bichrome floral designs with black horizontal bands and wavy lines on pots. Seals or pendants with engravings of animals on both sides were also recovered from this phase. The discovery of an octagonal fire altar made of burnt brick, with a yasti (a shaft) indicates ritual practices performed by the Harappans. The dominance of winter season crops indicates the winter precipitation might have supported the agriculture during the Early phase.

Transitional Phase (~2600−2500 BCE) The transitional phase is characterized by the combination of potteries belonging to Early and Mature Harappan phases. Before the onset of the Mature phase, the hearths were found within residential complex, although industrial activity got started in the Transitional phase. A seal lacking script found during the Transitional phase has a geometric pattern on one side and a little knob on the other side plausibly used as a stamp for trade practices. The settlers during this phase were practicing both winter and summer cropping system indicating amelioration in Indian summer monsoon.

Mature Harappan Phase (~2500−1800 BCE) During the Mature phase, technological and industrial activity in the form of bead and metallurgical processing testify to trade practices at the site. The ceramic and artifacts are dominated by black-on-red ware, plain red ware, perforated jars, pots and plates, globular pots, dish-on-stand, beakers, pots with pencil seals, sealing and cubicular weight etc. Other important artifacts like beads made of carnelian, lapis lazuli, steatite, agate and terracotta, shell and terracotta bangles, copper rings and fish hooks, terracotta spindle and whorls, toy-cart frames, figurines of humped bulls, and arrowheads etc. were recorded from this phase. Inscribed seals found from this phase had the engraving of a unicorn on them. The lower levels of this phase also revealed the evidence of streets. Potsherds with the impression of fabric remains of cotton indicate sophisticated-craft specialization. Ornaments made of gold were also found indicating high economic status of the settlers. Excavated trenches revealed small rooms and walls made of mud-bricks in the ratio of 1:2:4 (Mature Harappan feature) with post holes. A massive (8 m wide) wall built of mud bricks suggests that wall enclosures might have been built to prevent flooding as evidenced from Indus sites as Kalibangan, Kanmer and Khirsara (Kharakwal et al. 2012; Pokharia et al. 2017). Bones of tortoises, freshwater fish and cattle suggest that they have played an important role in the subsistence economy. Series of furnaces at different levels indicate that multiple artisans had worked simultaneously. Silos lined with mud plaster indicate the residential nature of the site. All this evidence demonstrates gradual transformation from agriculture to technological advancement during the Mature phase.

State of Agriculture: Development, Diversification and Intensification Identifying the exact origin of agriculture is challenging because the transition from hunter- gatherer societies to the sedentary life began thousands of years before the invention of writing. Nonetheless, archaeobotanists have traced the selection and cultivation of specific food plant characteristics, e.g. semi-tough rachis and larger seeds, to just after the Younger Dryas (~9500 BCE) in the early Holocene in the Levant region of the Fertile Crescent. There is considerable earlier evidence which indicates the use of wild cereal grains from sites across Southwest Asia and North Africa. It has been shown that the cultivation developed long after, hunter-gatherers began utilizing wild cereals like wild emmer wheat and barley at Ohalo II in Israel since ~22,000 BCE (Kislev et al. 1992; Piperno et al. 2004; Weiss et al. 2004). Cultivation of wild forms of cereals was also evident from the Late Natufian sites of the northern Levant (Middle Euphrates River Valley, Syria) after ca. 11,000 BCE and certainly prior to ca. 9000 BCE (Willcox 1999, 2002, 2004, 2005; Garrard 2000; Moore et al. 2000; Hillman et al. 2001).

The transition to agriculture in South Asia has taken multiple pathways, based on local domestication and adoption of crops from adjacent areas by hunter gatherer populations (Fuller and Murphy 2014). In these diverse strategies, relationships between sedentism, cultivation and herding emerged, though evidence suggests that sedentism preceded agriculture in the subcontinent (Fuller 2011a). The transition from hunter-gatherer societies to settled agriculture communities is demonstrated from sites located in the Ghaggar-Hakra valley of Indian sub-continent (Guha 1994). The early food producing communities were evidenced from the highlands of Baluchistan in Pakistan during 7th to 4th millennium BCE. The recent studies at Datrana IV in North Gujarat uncovered a Mesolithic hunter- gatherer occupation with superimposed Chalcolithic deposits showing semi-nomadic pastoralism and plant cultivation, which resulted in the domestication of several millets, pulses, and sesame (Garcia-Granero et al. 2016). South Asia acquired a unique Neolithic transition towards agricultural domestication (Murphy and Fuller 2017). Only a few Neolithic sites added archaeobotanical evidence from South Asia (Fuller et al. 2004). It is evidenced from northwestern region of South Asia, the dominant crops were derived from the Southwest Asian Neolithic Founder crops (Zohary 1996; Zohary and Hopf 2000). These founder crops of the agriculture mainly include Triticum sp., Hordeum vulgare, Pisum arvense, Lens culinaris, Cicer arietinum, Lathyrus sativus and Linum usitatissimum. The first possible domesticated forms of these cereals date from the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (ca. 9500 BCE) in adjacent regions of Southwest Asia, although their domestication status or dated time period is still questionable (Colledge 2001, 2004; Willcox 2005).

Later, these pastoral communities settled during the Early Harappan phase (regionalization era ~3300−2600 BCE) of IVC (Kenoyer 1991b). The expansion of human population and cultural exchange might lead to the development of agricultural practices (Harlan 1992; Madella and Fuller 2006) in spatial and temporal domain and became an advanced oldest civilization of South Asia. The plant-based subsistence economy of Early Harappans mainly relied on winter crops (uni-seasonal) like barley and wheat, but later diversification and intensification of variety of tropical pulses, oil and fiber crops along with horticultural plants modified their agricultural skills by harvesting two crops a year i.e. winter and summer season crops (Pokharia et al. 2011, 2014; Petrie and Bates 2017). The Early Harappans’ subsistence is also evident from native (Indian) pulse Vigna radiata, which might have originated in western Himalaya and the southern Peninsula; Macrotyloma uniflorum,

domesticate of Rajasthan, Gujarat or the southern Peninsula and small grained millet Panicum sumatrense at Harappa indicate pre-sedentary period in the region (Fuller 2006; Murphy and Fuller 2017). The archaeobotanical evidence from the archaeological sites of south India indicates the predominance of Vigna radiata, along with Macrotyloma uniflorum and millets Brachiaria ramosa and Setaria verticillata (Fuller et al. 2001, 2004). Further archaeological investigations are needed to document the emergence of pre-Harappan agricultural villages and their direct or indirect cultural contacts across India. Over the course of the Chalcolithic and Harappan era, the range of summer crops diversified across India, including more pulses, millets, and rice.

Harappans apparently evolved a more developed irrigation technology than their predecessors, that allowed to exploit the spacious and fertile Indus River basin (Kenoyer 1991a). The network of dams, canals and reservoirs at Indus/Harappans site Dholavira indicates elaborated water management system during the Indus time (Bisht 1998–1999). Being a region with fertile alluvium soils and perennial rivers, the Ghaggar basin might have been a potential area for settlement and surplus production of food grains.

The archaeobotanical evidence at 4MSR provides ample information to infer cropping system and subsistence strategies adopted by Harappans in the semi-arid region of western Rajasthan. Macro-remains data revealed that the Early phase (~2900−2600 BCE) at 4MSR was dominated by the winter crops like barley and wheat (Figure 5), when the climate was relatively conducive for agricultural practices and mainly governed by the winter precipitation as also noticed from other Harappan sites viz.,Miri-Qalat, Pirak, Harappa, Rohira, Sanghol, Kunal, Balu, Banawali, Shikarpur, Rojdi, Oriyo-Timbo, Babar-kot, and Kanmer (Costantini 1990; Saraswat, 1992; Reddy, 1994; Tengberg 1999; Saraswat and Pokharia 2002, 2003; Weber 2003; Pokharia et al. 2011) (Figure 6).

Several palynological and geochemical studies from the lakes of Rajasthan (such as Lunkaransar, Didwana, Sambhar) and Gujarat (such as Nal Sarovar and Malvan lake) suggest a change in climate and precipitation during different time intervals of the Holocene epoch and numerous significant monsoon variations (wet and dry episodes) over short and long term time scale (Vishnu-Mittre 1973, 1979; Singh et al. 1974, 1990; Vishnu-Mittre 1979; Bryson and Swain 1981; Swain et al. 1983;Wassonetal.1984;Prasadetal.1997;Enzel et al. 1999). After ~5000 BCE, the wet phase began again in the early Holocene (wetter conditions) after an arid interval after Last Glacial Maxima (LGM) indicated by high and continuous lake levels (Singh et al. 1974, 1990;Wassonetal.1984; Enzel et al. 1999). Similar brief episodic fluctuations of wet and dry phases were also recorded by the marine isotopic records (Staubwasser et al. 2002, 2003). Overall, the climatic conditions during the mid Holocene (~5000 BCE) showed consistently high rainfall with maximal winter monsoon (Singh et al. 1974; Bryson and Swain 1981; Enzel et al. 1999). The palynological data from the region of central India (Madhya Pradesh) also suggests higher winter precipitation during the beginning of third millennium BCE (Chauhan 1996, 2000, 2002). However, during the mid-third millennium BCE (~2600/2500 BCE) the transition of Holocene marks the onset of modern monsoonal conditions evidenced from central India (Chauhan et al. 2013). This phase corresponds with the Transitional Harappan phase (~2600−2500 BCE). Crop assemblage during the Mature Harappan phase indicates that the region experienced wetter and warmer climatic conditions (Figures 3 and 5). Agriculture strategy shifted from wetter conditions to drier (drought resistant crops) conditions, which suggests the human adaptation during the late Mature Phase (drought conditions). Attempts have been made to relate the

Figure 6 Relative proportion of cereal grains in the Indus/Harappan civilization.

evolution of the Harappan civilization to the changing monsoonal condition since the mid-Holocene. Moreover, the growth and migration/collapse of Harappan civilization has also been linked to the intensification of ISM during the mid-Holocene climate optimum and its subsequent weakening after mid-second millennium BCE respectively. The collapse of the contemporaneous civilizations such as the Akkadian (Mesopotamia), Yangtze (China), Minoan (Crete), has been attributed to either weakening of monsoon or Asian aridification during ~4.1 kyr (Singh et al. 1974; Enzel et al. 1999; Gupta et al. 2003; Staubwasser et al. 2003; Prasad and Enzel 2006; Dixit et al. 2014).

The history of origin, antiquity and spread of rice cultivation has long been a subject of debate. The origin of Oryza sativa, a domesticated Asian rice has been a contentious topic (Choi et al. 2017). For instance, there has been a long debate on the possibility of more than one geographically distinct origin of rice e.g. India and China. Changes in land use pattern by early farmers, selection for the traits for rice domestication, modernization of agricultural techniques, crop economy based on rice are major study areas to answer the questions related to history of rice domestication. Domestication of rice in India and China was followed by two pathways for the early cultivation of rice, one with selection for domestication traits in early Yangtze japonica and another a non-domestication feedback system inferred for “proto-indica” (Fuller 2011b). Recent genetic studies suggest that the course of continuous selection of desirable traits, Oryza sativa sp. japonica arose separately from wild progenitor O. rufipogon and/or O. nivara into domesticated species (Choi et al. 2017). Genetic research shows that there are two distinct taxonomically recognized subspecies indica and japonica (Garris et al. 2005; Londo et al. 2006; Fuller et al. 2009) and

also identifies a group of indica-like rice lineages, referred to as aus rice (McNally et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2011; Schatz et al. 2014; Civan et al. 2015; Travis et al. 2015; Choi et al. 2017). It has been suggested that the first domesticated rice population arose from O. rufipogon at ~13.1–24.1 ka and later on the expansion of O. rufipogon occurred after the Last Glacial Maximum at ~18 ka (Choi et al. 2017). They further states that there is significant gene flow from japonica to both indica and aus, which led to the transfer of domestication alleles from early domesticated japonica to proto-indica and proto-aus populations.

Recent versions of rice domestication highlight the necessity of hybridization between a fully domesticated japonica and semi-domesticated proto-indica, whereby japonica became the donor of many domestication syndrome genes in indica (Sang and Ge 2007; Sweeney and McCouch 2007; Fuller et al. 2016). The evidence of rice from Indus sites such as Kunal, Balu and Banawali in northwestern India (Saraswat et al. 2000; Saraswat 2002; Saraswat and Pokharia 2002, 2003) suggests its cultivation in the Indus plain, however their actual context is not very clear due to lack of direct dates. The recent direct dates of rice from Masudpur I, Haryana (~2430−2140 BCE; Petrie et al. 2017) and 4MSR (~2340−2210 BCE) surmise the rice cultivation during the late Mature phase in the Indus region. Bates et al. (2017) reported the wild and domesticated type spikelets and found the progressive increase in the proportion of domesticated type spikelets bases during the late Mature phase. The accompanying weeds, however, showed no increased proportions of wetland species (Bates et al. 2017). It was, therefore, suggested that the development of an independent rice tradition might have been intertwined with the practice of settled populations living in the eastern most reaches of the IVC. A few rice grains from 4MSR without spikelet bases showing resemblance with the rice grains have been identified as proto-indica due to predominant wild morphological appearance (i.e. immature grains). Occurrence of proto-indica rice from 4MSR suggests pre-domestication cultivation during the late Mature phase of Indus/Harappan period. The evidence of rice outside its natural habitats of wild rices and Indus crop package (wheat and barley) into the Ganges Valley between 2850−2460 (Pokharia et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2017) suggest that the dispersal of crops from Ganga Valley and vice-versa may be due to direct or indirect contacts.

Cotton is known as a crop of great importance for agriculture, industry and trade, especially for tropical and subtropical regions. The exploitation of cotton fabric has been shown from several sites viz., Mohenjo-daro in Sind (Pakistan) (Marshall 1931) and Nevasa (Clutton-Brock et al. 1961) during ~3000 BCE. However, the seeds observed from the sites such as Harappa (Weber 2003), Hulas (Saraswat 1993), Chandoli (Kajale 1991) and Loenbar 3 (Costantini 1987), Balakot (Fuller 2001), Kunal (Saraswat and Pokharia 2003), Banawali (Saraswat et al. 2000), Kanmer (Pokharia et al. 2011), Khirsara (Pokharia et al. 2017) suggest that the cultivation of cotton has been practiced since the Mature Harappan times (~2600−2200 BCE). Our finding from 4MSR also observed plenty of cotton seeds from the Transitional phase-11% to the Mature phase-28% (~2600−1900 BCE). The abundance of cotton seeds during the Mature phase suggests their prolonged cultivation as a fibrous crop owing to favourable climatic conditions. Potsherd with the impression of a fabric corroborates the macro-botanical finds recovered from the site and also indicates intensive usage/trade.

CONCLUSION The subsistence pattern at 4MSR indicates continuity and change in temporal domain likely owing to changing climatic/environmental conditions, resources and knowledge gained by

exchange/trades of cultures over a time period of ~2900−1800 BCE. The crop-change appears to be intentional as the human population in the past is known to have managed crops in a range of ways (Pokharia et al. 2017). The evidence provided by the combination of macro-botanical remains in specific context and phases of occupation reveal much about bi-seasonal cropping which enables consideration of issues related to adoption, intensification, adaptation and resilience in the face of changing social, economic and environmental conditions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are thankful to the Director General of the Archaeological Survey of India, New Delhi, and the Director of BSIP, Lucknow, U.P., for permission and encouragement to collaborate for multidisciplinary studies. We are grateful to the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, for providing financial support under SERB-DST Project No. EMR/2015/ 000881. We are also grateful to anonymous reviewers and A.J.T. Jull and Yaroslav Kuzmin for their constructive comments, which greatly helped to improve the earlier version of the manuscript.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC. 2020.37

REFERENCES Anonymous. 2006. A handbook of agriculture. New Chanchala S. 1994. Harappan plant economy in the Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Rann of Kutch, Gujarat. Geophytology 23(2): Bates J, Patrie CA. 2016. Phytolith analysis and the 227−233. Indus civilisation: A review. Man and Environ- Chauhan MS. 1996. Origin and history of tropical ment XLI(2):32−49. deciduous Sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests Bates J, Singh RN, Petrie CA. 2017. Exploring Indus in Madhya Pradesh, India. The Palaeobotanist crop processing: combining phytolith and 43:89–101. macrobotanical analyses to consider the organisa- Chauhan MS. 2000. Pollen evidence of late- tion of agriculture in northwest India c. 3200–1500 Quaternary vegetation and climate change in BC. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany Northeastern Madhya Pradesh, India. The 26:25–41. Palaeobotanist 49:491–500. Bhan KK, Vidale M, Kenoyer JM. 2002. Some Chauhan MS. 2002. Holocene vegetation and climatic important aspects of the Harappan technological changes in southeastern Madhya Pradesh, India. tradition. In: Settar S, Korisettar R, editors. Current Science 83:1444–1445. Indian archaeology in Retrospect. Vol. 2. Chauhan MS, Sharma A, Phartiyal B, Kumar K. 2013. Protohistory: Archaeology of the Harappan Holocene vegetation and climatic variations in civilization. New Delhi: Indian Council of Central India: A study based on multiproxy Historical Research. p. 223–272. evidences. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 77:45−58. Bisht RS. 1998–99. Dholavira and Banawali: two Choi JY, Platts AE, Fuller DQ, Hsing YI, Wing RA, different paradigms of the Harappan Urbis Purugganan MD. 2017. The rice paradox: forma. Purattatva 29:14–32. multiple origins but single domestication in Bronk Ramsey C. 2017. Methods for summarizing Asian rice. Molecular Biology and Evolution radiocarbon datasets. Radiocarbon 59(6): 34:969–979. 1809−1833. Civan P, Craig H, Cox CJ, Brown TA, Fuller DQ, Brouwer C, Heibloem M. 1986. Irrigation water Molina J, Huang X, Gross BL, Zhao Z, Goff SA, management: Irrigation water needs. Training et al. 2015. Three geographically separate manual no. 3. Italy: Food and Agriculture domestications of Asian rice. Nature Plants Organization of United Nations. 1(15164):1−5. Bryson RA, Swain AM. 1981. Holocene variations of Clutton-Brock J, Mittre V, Gulati AN. 1961. the monsoon rainfall in Rajasthan. Quaternary Technical reports on Archaeological Remains. Research 16:135–145. Poona: University of Poona.

Colledge S. 2001. Plant exploitation on Fuller DQ, Korisettar R, Venkatasubbaiah PC, Epipalaeolithic and early Neolithic sites in the Jones MK. 2004. Early plant domestications Levant. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. in southern India: some preliminary archaeo- Colledge S. 2004. Reappraisal of the archaeobo- botanical results. Vegetation History and tanical evidence for the emergence and dispersal Archaeobotany 13:115–129. of the founder crops. In: Peltenberg E, Wasse A, Fuller DQ, Qin Ling, Zheng Yunfei, Zhao Zhijun, editors. Neolithic revolution. New perspectives on Chen Xugao, Hosoya Leo Aoi, Sun Guo-Ping. southwest Asia in light of recent discoveries on 2009. The domestication process and domestica- Cyprus. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p. 49–60. tion rate in rice: Spikelet bases from the Lower Costantini L. 1987. Appendix B: Vegetal remains. In: Yangtze. Science 323:1607–1610. Stacul G, editor. Prehistoric and protohistoric Fuller DQ, Murphy C. 2014. Overlooked but not Swat, Pakistan. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il forgotten: India as a center for agricultural Medio ed Estremo Orientale. p. 155–165. domestication. General Anthropology 21:5–8. Costantini L. 1990. Harappan agriculture in Pakistan: Fuller DQ, Weisskopf AR, Castillo CC. 2016. The evidence of Nausharo. In: Taddei M, editor. Pathways of rice diversification across Asia. South Asian Archaeology 1987. Rome: Istituto Archaeology International 19:84–89. Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Orientale. García-Granero JJ, Lancelotti C, Madella M. 2015. p. 321−332. A tale of multi-proxies: integrating macro- and Dixit Y, Hodell DA, Petrie CA. 2014. Abrupt microbotanical remains to understand subsistence weakening of the summer monsoon in northwest strategies. Vegetation History and Archaeo- India ~4100 yr ago. Geology 42(4):339−342. botany 24:121−133. Enzel Y, Ely LL, Mishra S, Ramesh R, Amit R, García-Granero JJ, Lancelotti C, Madella M, Lazar B, Rajaguru SN, Baker VR, Sandler A. Ajithprasad P. 2016. Millets and herders: the 1999. High resolution Holocene environmental origins of plant cultivation in semi-arid North changes in the Thar Desert, northwestern India. Gujarat (India). Current Anthropology 57(2): Science 284:125–127. 149–173. Farooqui A, Gaur AS, Prasad V. 2013. Climate, Garrard A. 2000. Charting the emergence of cereal vegetation and ecology during Harappan period: and pulse domestication in South-West Asia. Excavations at Kanjetar and Kaj, mid-Saurashtra Environmental Archaeology 4:67–86. coast, Gujarat. Journal of Archaeological Science Garris AJ, Tai TH, Coburn J, Kresovich S, McCouch S. 40:2631–2647. 2005. Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza Ford RI. 1979. Paleoethnobotany in American sativa L. Genetics 169:1631–1638. archaeology. In: Schiffer MB, editor. Advances Guha S. 1994. Recognizing “Harappan”: A critical in Archaeological Method and Theory. Vol. 2. review of the position of hunter-gatherers within New York: Academic Press. p. 285–336. Harappan society. South Asian Studies 10(1): Fritz G. 2005. Paleoethnobotanical Methods and 91−97. Applications. In: Maschner HDG, Chippindale C, Gupta AK, Anderson DM, Overpeck JT. 2003. editors. Handbook of archaeological methods. Abrupt changes in the Asian southwest Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira Press. p. 771−832. monsoon during the Holocene and their links to Fuller DQ. 2001. Fifty years of archaeobotanical the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 42: 354–357. studies in India: laying a solid foundation. In: Harlan JR. 1992. Indigenous African agriculture. In: Settar S, Korisettar R, editors. Indian archaeology Cowan C, Wesley C, Watson PJ, editors. the in retrospect: Proto History Archaeology of the origins of agriculture: An international Harappan civilization. Vol. II. New Delhi: perspective. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Indian Council of Historical Research. p. 247–364. Institution Press. p. 59−70. Fuller DQ. 2006. Agricultural origins and frontiers in Hillman GC, Hedges R, Moore AMT, Colledge S, South Asia: a working synthesis. Journal of Pettitt P. 2001. New evidence of Late Glacial World Prehistory 20:1−86. cereal cultivation at Abu Hureyra on the Fuller DQ. 2011a. Finding plant domestication in the Euphrates. The Holocene 11(4):383–393. Indian Subcontinent. Current Anthropology Kajale MD. 1991. Current status of Indian 52(Suppl 4):S347−S362. doi: 10.1086/658900. palaeoethnobotany. In: Renfrew J, editor. New Fuller DQ. 2011b. Pathways to Asian civilizations: light on early farming. Edinburgh: Edinburgh tracing the origins and spread of rice and rice University Press. p. 155–190. cultures. Rice 4:78−92. Kenoyer JM. 1991a. The Indus Valley tradition of Fuller DQ. 2018. Rice: A user guide for Pakistan and Western India. Journal of World archaeologists. From the UCL Early Rice Prehistory 5(4):331−385. Project. Version 1.0. University College London. Kenoyer JM. 1991b. Urban process in the Indus Fuller DQ, Korisettar R, Venkatasubbaiah PC. 2001. tradition: a preliminary model from Harappa. Southern Neolithic cultivation systems: a In: Meadow RH, editor. Harappa Excava- reconstruction based on archaeobotanical evidence. tions 1986–1990. Madison: Prehistory Press. South Asian Studies 17:171–187. p. 29–60.

Kenoyer JM. 1994. Faience from the Indus Valley Murphy CA, Fuller DQ. 2017. The Agriculture of civilization. Ornament 17(3):36–39. Early India. In: Shugart H, editor. Oxford Kenoyer JM. 2010. Measuring the Harappan world: research encyclopaedia of environmental insights into the Indus order and cosmology. In: science. New York: Oxford University Press. Morley I, Renfrew C, editors. The archaeology doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.169. of measurement: Comprehending Heaven, Earth Pearsall DM. 2000. Palaeoethnobotany: A handbook and time in ancient societies. New York: of procedures. 2nd edition. San Diego (CA): Cambridge University Press. p. 106−121. Academic Press. Kharakwal JS, Rawat YS, Osada T. 2012. Excavation Petrie CA, Bates J, Higham T, Singh RN. 2016. at Kanmer 2005-06–2008-09. Kyoto: Indus Feeding ancient cities in South Asia: dating Project, Research Institute for Humanity and the adoption of rice, millet and tropical pulses Nature. in the Indus civilisation. Antiquity 90(354): Kislev ME, Nadel D, Carmi I. 1992. Epipalaeolithic 1489–1504. (19,000 bp) cereal and fruit diet at Ohalu II, Seaof Petrie CA, Bates J. 2017. Multi-cropping’, Galilee, Israel. Review of Palaeobotany and intercropping and adaptation to variable Palynology 73:161–166. environments in Indus South Asia. Journal of Lancelotti C. 2010. Fuelling Harappan hearths: World Prehistory 30:81–130. Human–environment interactions as revealed by Petrie CA, Singh RN, Bates J, Dixit Y, Rench CAI, fuel exploitation and use [unpublished PhD Dodell DA, Jones PJ, Lancelotti C, Lyman F, dissertation]. Cambridge: Department of Neogi S, Pandek AK, Parikh D, Pawar V, Archaeology, University of Cambridge. Redhouse DI, Singh DP. 2017. Adaptation to Lancelotti C, Ruiz-Pérez J, García-Granero JJ. 2017. variable environments, resilience to climate Investigating fuel and fireplaces with a change: investigating Land, Water and Settlement combination of phytoliths and multi-element in northwest India. Current Anthropology 58(1): analysis; an ethnographic experiment. 1−30. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 26:75–83. Piperno DR, Wiess E, Holst I, Nadel D. 2004. Levey M, Burke JE. 1959. A study of ancient Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Mesopotamian bronze. Chymia 5:37−50. Palaeolithic revealed by starch grain analysis. Liu X, Lister DL, Zhao Z, Petrie CA, Zeng XS, Nature 430:670–673. Jones PJ, Staff RA, Pokharia AK, Bates J, USDA. 2020. Plants database. Natural Resource Singh RN, Weber SA, Matuzeviciute GM, Conservation Services. United States Department Dong G, Li H, Lu H, Jiang H, Wang J, Ma J, of Agriculture. Available at: https://plants.usda. Tian D, Jin G, Zhou L, Wu X, Jones MK. gov/core/profile?symbol=jure80. 2017. Journey to the East: diverse routes and Pokharia AK, Kharakwal JS, Rawat RS, Osada T, variable flowering times for wheat and barley Nautiyal CM, Srivastava A. 2011. Archaeo- en route to prehistoric China. PLoS ONE. doi: botany and archaeology at Kanmer, a Harappan 10.1371/journal.pone.0187405. site in Kachchh, Gujarat: Evidence for adaptation Londo JP, Chiang Y-C, Hung K-H, Chiang T-Y, in response to climatic variability. Current Science Schaal BA. 2006. Phylogeography of Asian wild 100:1833−1846. rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple indepen- Pokharia AK, Kharakwal JS, Srivastava A. 2014. dent domestications of cultivated rice, Oryza Archaeobotanical evidence of millets in the sativa. Proceedings of National Academy of Indian subcontinent with some observations on Sciences 103:9578–9583. their role in the Indus civilisation. Journal of Madella M, Fuller DQ. 2006. Palaeoecology and the Archaeological Science 42:442–455. Harappan civilisation of South Asia: a Pokharia AK, Sharma S, Tripathi D, Misra N, reconsideration. Quaternary Science Reviews Pal JN, Ram Vinay, Srivastava A. 2016. 25:1283–1301. Neolithic-Early Historic (2500–200 BC) plant use: Marshall J. 1931. Mohenjo-daro and the Indus the archaeobotany of Ganga Plain. Quaternary civilization. London: Arthur Probsthain. International 443:223−237. doi: 10.1016/j. Martin AC, Barkley WD. 1961. Seed identification quaint.2016.09.018. manual. University of California Press. Pokharia AK, Agnihotri R, Sharma S, Bajpai S, Nath J, McNally KL, Childs KL, Bohnert R, Davidson RM, Kumaran RN, Negi BC. 2017. Altered cropping Zhao K, Ulat VJ, Zeller G, Clark RM, Hoen DR, pattern and cultural continuation with declined Bureau TE, et al. 2009. Genomewide SNP prosperity following abrupt and extreme arid variation reveals relationships among landraces event at ~4,200 yrs BP: Evidence from an Indus and modern varieties of rice. Proceedings of archaeological site Khirsara, Gujarat, western National Academy of Sciences 106:12273–12278. India. PLoS ONE 12(10): e0185684. Moore AMT, Hillman GC, Legge AT. 2000. Village Popper VS. 1988. Selecting quantitative measurements on the Euphrates. From foraging to farming at in palaeoethnobotany. In: Hastorf CA, Popper VS, Abu Hureyra. New York: Oxford University editors. Current palaeoethnobotany. Chicago: Press. University of Chicago Press. p. 53–71.

Possehl GL. 1999. Indus Age: The beginnings. Shinde V. 2016. Current perspectives on Harappan Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania civilization. In: Schug GR, Walimbe SR, Press. editors. A companion to South Asia in the past. Possehl GL. 2002. The Indus Civilization: A John Willey & Sons. p. 127−144. contemporary perspective. Walnut Creek (CA): Singh G, Joshi RD, Chopra SK, Singh AB. 1974. Late Alta Mira Press. Quaternary history of vegetation and climate in Prasad S, Enzel Y. 2006. Holocene paleoclimates of the Rajasthan Desert, India. Philosophical India. Quaternary Research 66(3): 442–453. Transactions of the Royal Society of London Prasad S, Kusumgar S, Gupta SK. 1997. A mid- to 267:467–501. late Holocene record of palaeoclimatic changes Singh G, Wasson RJ, Agrawal DP. 1990. from NalSarovar: a palaeodesert margin lake in Vegetational and seasonal climatic changes western India. Journal of Quaternary Science since the last full glacial in the Thar Desert, 12:153–159. northwestern India. Review of Palaeobotany Reddy SN. 1994. Plant usage and subsistence and Palynology 64:351–358. modelling: an ethnoarchaeological approach to Staubwasser M, Sirocko F, Grootes PM, the Late Harappan of northwest India Erlenkeuser H. 2002. South Asian monsoon [dissertation]. University of Wisconsin-Madison. climate change and radiocarbon in the Arabian Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Sea during early and middle Holocene. Bronk Ramsey C, Buck CE, Cheng H, Paleoceanography 17(4):1063. doi: 10.1029/ Edwards RL, Friedrich M, et al. 2013. IntCal13 2000PA000608. and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves Staubwasser M, Sirocko F, Grootes PM, Segl M. 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4): 2003. Climate change at the 4.2 ka BP 1869−1887. termination of the Indus Valley Civilization and Sang T, Ge S. 2007. Genetics and phylogenetics of rice Holocene south Asian monsoon variability. domestication. Current opinion in genetics & Geophysical Research Letters 30:1425–1429. development 17: 533–538. Stuiver M, Polach HA. 1977. Discussion: Reporting Saraswat KS. 1993. Plant Economy of Late of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355−363. Harappans at Hulas. Puratattva 23:1–12. Stuiver M, Reimer PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base Saraswat KS. 1986. Ancient crop economy of and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration Harappans from Rohira, Punjab (Ca. 2,000–1,700 program. Radiocarbon 35(1):215−230. B.C.). Palaeobotanist 35:32−38. Swain AM, Kutzbach JE, Hastenrath S. 1983. Saraswat KS. 1992. Archaeobotanical remains in Estimates of Holocene precipitation for ancient cultural and socio-economical dynamics Rajasthan, India, based on pollen and lake-level of the Indian subcontinent. The Palaeobotanist data. Quaternary Research 19:1–17. 40:514−545. Sweeney M, McCouch SR. 2007. The complex history Saraswat KS. 1995. Annual report 1994−95. of the rice domestication. Annals of Botany Lucknow, India: Birbal Sahni Institute of 100:951–957. Palaeobotany. p. 116−117. Tengberg M. 1999. Crop husbandry at Miri Qalat, Saraswat KS. 2002. Balu (29°40’N; 76°22’E), district Makran, SW Pakistan (4000–2000 B.C.). Kaithal. Indian Archaeology 1996–1997—a Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 8: review. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of 3−12. India. p. 198–203. Travis AJ, Norton GJ, Datta S, Samar R, Dasgupta T, Saraswat KS, Pokharia AK. 2002. Harappan plant Savio FL, Macaulay M, Hedley PE, McNally KL, economy at ancient Balu, Haryana. Pragdhara Sumon MH, Islam MR, Price AH. 2015. Assessing 12:153–171. the genetic diversity of rice originating from Saraswat KS, Pokharia AK. 2003. Palaeoethnobo- Bangladesh, Assam and West Bengal. Rice tanical investigations at Early Harappan Kunal. 8(35):1−9. Pragdhara 13:105–139. Vats MS. 1974. Excavation at Harappa (First Saraswat KS, Srivastava C, Pokharia AK. 2000. published in 1940). Government of India, Delhi. Palaeobotanical and pollen analytical investiga- Varanasi: Bhartiya Publishing House. tions. Indian Archaeology 1994–1995—a review. Vishnu-Mittre, Sharma C. 1979. Palaeobotanical New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India. evidences of the environment of early man in p. 96–97. northwestern and western India. Grana 18: Schatz MC, Maron LG, Stein JC, Wences AH, 167–181. Gurtowski J, Biggers E, Lee H, Kramer M, Vishnu-Mittre, Sharma C. 1973. Pollen analysis of the Antoniou E, Ghiban E, et al. 2014. Whole salt flat at Malvan, Gujarat. The Palaeobotanist genome de novo assemblies of three divergent 22:118–123. strains of rice, Oryzasativa, document novel Vishnu-Mittre, Sharma C. 1979. Pollen analytical gene space of ausandindica. Genome Biology studies at the Nal Lake (Nalsarovar), Gujarat. 15(506):1−16. The Palaeobotanist 26:95–104.

Wasson RJ, Smith GI, Agrawal DP. 1984. Late archaeobotanical data. In: Gosden C, Hather J, Quaternary sediments, minerals and inferred editors. The prehistory of food. Appetites for geochemical history of Didwana Lake, Thar change. London: Routeledge. p. 478–500 Desert, India. Palaeogeography Palaeocli- Willcox G. 2002. Charred plant remains from a 10th matology Palaeoecology 46:345–372. millennium B.P. kitchen at Jerf el Ahmar (Syria). Weber SA. 1991. Plants and Harappan economy: An Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 11:55–60. example of stability and change from Rojdi. New Willcox G. 2004. Measuring grain size and identifying Delhi, Bombay and Calcutta: Oxford and IBH Near Eastern cereal domestication: evidence from Publication Co. Pvt. Ltd. the Euphrates valley. Journal of Archaeological Weber SA. 1999. Seeds of urbanism: paleoethno- Science 31:145–150. botany and the Indus civilization. Antiquity Willcox G. 2005. The distribution, natural habitats 73:813–826. and availability of wild cereals in relation to Weber SA. 2003. Archaeobotany at Harappa: their domestication in the Near East: multiple Indicationsforchange.In:WeberSA,BelcherWR, events, multiple centres. Vegetation History and editors. Indus ethnobiology: New perspectives Archaeobotany 14:534–541. from the field. Maryland: Lexington Books. Zohary D. 1996. The mode of domestication of the p. 175−198. founder crops of Southwest Asian agriculture. Weber SA, Tim B, Lehman H. 2010. Ecological In: Harris DR, editor. The origins and spread continuity: An explanation for agricultural of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia. diversity in the Indus Civilization and beyond. London: UCL Press. p. 142–158. Man and Environment XXXV(1):62–75. Zohary D, Hopf M. 2000. Domestication of plants in Weiss E, Wetterstrom W, Nadel D, Bar-Yosef O. the old world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004. The broad spectrum revisited: Evidence Zhao K, Tung CW, Eizenga GC, Wright MH, from plant remains. Proceedings of the National Ali ML, Price AH, Norton GJ, Islam MR, Academy of Sciences 101(26):9551–9555. Reynolds A, Mezey J, McClung AM, Wheeler REM. 1947. The recording of archaeological Bustamante CD, McCouch SR. 2011. Genome- strata. Ancient India 3:143–150. wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic Willcox G. 1999. Agrarian change and the beginnings architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa. of cultivation in the Near East: evidence from Nature Communications 2(467):1−10. doi: 10. wild progenitors, experimental cultivation and 1038/ncomms1467.