Baseline Mobility Assessment

Home , Darqad District, Farkhar District, Khwaja Ghar District, Taloqan

BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT TAKHAR Takhar is frequently affected by natural disasters, which often leads to damaged or destroyed SUMMARY RESULTS housing, reduced livelihood options and loss of life. According to DTM’s Round 10 Community- Based Needs Assessment (CBNA), natural disasters in Takhar resulted in 26 fatalities between ROUND 10 ▪ JAN – JUNE 2020 January to June 2020. © IOM 2020 ABOUT DTM The Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) is a system that tracks HIGHLIGHTS and monitors displacement and population mobility. It is designed districts assessed to regularly and systematically capture, process and disseminate 17 information to provide a better understanding of the movements 540 settlements assessed and evolving needs of displaced populations, whether on site or en route. For more information about DTM in Afghanistan, please 3,367 visit www.displacement.iom.int/afghanistan. key informants interviewed In Afghanistan, DTM employs the Baseline Mobility Assessment 149,471 tool, designed to track mobility, determine the population sizes and returnees from abroad [2012-2020] locations of forcibly displaced people, reasons for displacement, places of origin, displacement locations and times of displacement, 68,358 including basic demographics, as well as vulnerabilities and priority IDPs [2012–2020] currently in host communities needs. Data is collected at the settlement level, through key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and direct observations. 513,563 former IDPs have returned to their homes [2012–2020] DTM enables IOM and its partners to deliver evidence-based, better targeted, mobility-sensitive and sustainable humanitarian 183,928 assistance, reintegration, community stabilization and development out-migrants fled abroad [2012–2020] programming. 30,425 out-migrants fled to Europe (17%) 5 TARGET POPULATIONS 316 Through the Baseline Mobility Assessments, DTM tracks the returnees and IDPs live in tents or in the open air locations, population sizes, and cross-sectoral needs of five core target population categories: 2 in 5 persons (40%) in Darqad district and more than 1. Returnees from Abroad 27% in Baharak, Bangi, Namak Ab, Khwaja Ghar, Afghans who had fled abroad for at least 6 months and have now returned to Afghanistan Eshkamesh and Khwaja Bahawuddin are either IDPs or returnees 2. Out-Migrants Afghans who moved or fled abroad 2 in 5 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), subdivided into the following 42% of all returnees and IDPs in Takhar reside three categories: in only 3 districts: Taloqan, Khwaja Ghar and 3. Fled IDPs Eshkmesh Afghans from an assessed village who fled as IDPs to reside elsewhere in Afghanistan 1 in 2 49% of all former IDPs from Takhar have returned 4. Arrival IDPs home IDPs from other locations currently residing in an assessed village 5. Returned IDPs 1 in 5 Afghans from an assessed village who had fled as IDPs in the past persons in Eshkmesh, Bangi, Baharak, Hazar and have now returned home Sumuch, Namak Ab, Khwaja Ghar and Khwaja Data on population sizes for the 5 target population categories is Bahawuddin is a returnee collected by time of displacement, using each of the following time frames: 2012-2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018. • 2019 • 2020

For more information, please contact: [email protected] www.displacement.iom.int/afghanistan BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 2 Displaced Individuals in all 5 Target Populations | Summary Overview by District Total Inflow *Base (Returnees + % of % of % of Arrival % of Returned % of Out % of District Population Arrival IDPs) Pop. Returnees Pop. Fled IDPs Pop. IDPs Pop. IDPs Pop. Migrants Pop. Taloqan 248,830 33,796 12% 18,524 7% 5,550 2% 15,272 5% 6,635 3% 24,719 10% Hazar Sumuch 15,013 3,470 19% 3,148 17% 1,028 7% 322 2% 348 2% 4,394 29% Baharak 33,746 15,614 32% 9,523 19% 8,488 25% 6,091 12% 40,757 121% 11,153 33% Bangi 38,367 14,455 27% 12,393 23% 4,096 11% 2,062 4% 5,117 13% 16,065 42% Chal 30,796 3,784 11% 2,454 7% 3,586 12% 1,330 4% 2,098 7% 2,431 8% Namak Ab 13,344 5,869 31% 3,729 19% 13,738 103% 2,140 11% 12,331 92% 4,208 32% Kalafgan 38,494 2,136 5% 1,884 5% 726 2% 252 1% 178 0% 2,553 7% Farkhar 51,198 3,345 6% 3,268 6% 1,590 3% 77 0% 469 1% 4,699 9% Khwaja Ghar 73,426 30,409 29% 24,273 23% 17,123 23% 6,136 6% 213,028 290% 25,125 34% Rostaq 179,591 15,660 8% 11,094 6% 9,614 5% 4,566 2% 3,164 2% 15,804 9% Eshkmesh 64,415 28,112 30% 22,156 24% 18,160 28% 5,956 6% 65,020 101% 30,986 48% Dasht-e-Qala 34,902 6,801 16% 5,802 14% 5,247 15% 999 2% 27,576 79% 7,014 20% Warsaj 41,446 4,464 10% 4,170 9% 1,227 3% 294 1% 1,393 3% 5,935 14% Khwaja Bahawuddin 25,406 13,865 35% 7,447 19% 2,205 9% 6,418 16% 27,085 107% 7,702 30% Darqad 29,384 19,489 40% 7,893 16% 6,097 21% 11,596 24% 98,782 336% 5,954 20% Chahab 86,587 7,561 8% 5,431 6% 4,103 5% 2,130 2% 5,102 6% 6,641 8% Yangi Qala 48,907 8,999 16% 6,282 11% 4,189 9% 2,717 5% 4,480 9% 8,545 17% Total 1,053,852 217,829 17% 149,471 12% 106,767 10% 68,358 5% 513,563 49% 183,928 17%

* Base Population source: NSIA Population Estimates for 1397 (2018 to 2019) Symbology:target population ≥ 200,000 % of base population ≥ 25%

DTM enumerators contribute to the ongoing COVID-19 response by disseminating COVID-19 RCCE information materials in communities during mobility and needs assessments, like this enumerator in Farkhar district. © IOM 2020 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 3 METHODOLOGY KEY INFORMANTS The overall objective of DTM's Baseline Mobility Assessment DTM’s field enumerators collect data at the settlement level, in Afghanistan is to track mobility and displacement, provide predominantly through focus group discussions with key population estimates, locations and geographic distribution of informants. While assessing communities, enumerators also displaced, return and migrant populations, as well as refugees, observe the living conditions and availability of multi-sectoral nomads, cross-border tribal groups, and both domestic and services. In the rare case that DTM’s District Focal Points cannot international labour migrants. DTM captures additional mobility physically reach a community, due to insecurity, conflict, or risk of information, including reasons for displacement and return, retaliation, DFPs meet the focus groups at safe locations outside places of origin and destination, times of displacement and their communities or conduct the assessments by phone. return, secondary displacements, and population demographics, vulnerabilities and multi-sectoral needs. By actively recruiting more female enumerators, though challenging, DTM has made significant strides to improve DTM predominantly employs enumerators who originate from gender inclusion in focus group discussions, although there is the areas of assessment. Enumerators collect quantitative data much room for improvement. While women only represent 2% at the settlement level, through focus group discussions with key of the key informants in Takhar, this is an improvement from the informants (KIs). Through direct observations, enumerators also national average of 0.1% female representation in DTM 's first collect qualitative data on living conditions, basic services, and round, completed in March 2017. security and socio-economic situation. Due to security risks, enumerators cannot carry smart-phones 3,367 316 or tablets in the field, therefore they collect data, daily, using key informants (KIs) key informants are IDPs a paper-based form, which is pre-filled with data from the interviewed or returnees (6%) previous round for verification of existing data and to expedite 82 859 the assessment process. Completed forms are submitted weekly female key informants KIs from host to the provincial DTM office and verified for accuracy bythe (2%) communities (17%) team leader and data entry clerk. Once verified, the data is entered electronically via mobile devices, using KoBo forms, and 3,285 1,088 submitted directly into DTM's central SQL server in Kabul, where male key informants KIs from multi-sectoral it is systematically cleaned and verified daily, through automated (98%) and social services (21%) and manual systems. This stringent review process ensures that DTM data is of the highest quality, accuracy and integrity. 6.2 1,062 average number of KIs KIs from local When DTM assesses a province for the first time, enumerators per focus group authorities (21%) collect data through two rounds of two-layered assessments: 1. District-level assessment (B1): this assessment aims to identify settlements with high inflows and outflows of Key Informants by Type | Takhar Afghan nationals and provide estimated numbers of each target population category.

2. Settlement-level assessment (B2): based on the results of B1, 1% this assessment collects information on inflows and outflows 9.7% of each target population category at each settlement 17% (village), identified through B1. Additional villages are also 1% identified and assessed, based on referrals from KIs. 0.8% 3% Since DTM has now assessed all 34 provinces, only settlement- 1% level assessments will be conducted in the future. Pending continued funding, DTM aims to conduct baseline mobility 6% assessments, nationwide, twice per year.

6% 20% Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, DTM enumerators have been striving to conduct FGDs outdoors. © IOM 2020

Community/Tribal Representative Community Development Council (CDC) Representative Displaced Groups Representative Education Representative Health Sector Representative Humanitarian/Social Organization Other District Authority Representative Small/Medium Enterprise Representative Agriculture Representative Other BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 4 RETURNEES Returnees are Afghan nationals who have returned to Returnees from Abroad | Country/Region of Origin | Takhar Afghanistan in the assessed location after having spent at least 120,000 68% six months abroad. This group includes both documented 101,757 returnees (Afghans who were registered refugees in host 100,000 countries and then requested voluntary return with UNHCR and 80,000 relevant national authorities) and undocumented returnees 60,000 (Afghans who did not request voluntary return with UNHCR, but 22% Individuals 40,000 33,376 rather returned spontaneously from host countries, irrespective 9% of whether or not they were registered refugees with UNHCR 20,000 13,663 0% 0.3% 0.09% 62 481 132 and relevant national authorities). 0 Pakistan Iran Europe Middle East Rest of Asia Other 2019 saw a major increase in the number of returnees returning including to Takhar, most of those originating from Iran. In 2020, the Turkey number of returnees coming from abroad is expected to remain stable, pending results from the next round of BMA data Returnees from Abroad | Annual Trends | Takhar collection. 45,000 38,295 149,471 33,376 40,000 returnees from returned from 35,000 31,550 abroad Pakistan (22%) 30,000 25,000 22,963 20,499 18,892 107,832 101,757 20,000 17,272 undocumented returned from Iran Individuals 15,000 returnees from (68%) 10,000 Pakistan + Iran (72%) 5,000 0 27,301 14,338 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 documented returnees from returnees from non-neighbouring Returnees from Europe & Turkey | Annual Trends | Takhar Pakistan + Iran (18%) countries (10%) 6,000 5,096 5,000

4,000

Returnees from Abroad by District | Takhar 3,000 2,486 2,332 2,018 Individuals 2,000 Khwaja Ghar 24,273 1,407 Eshkmesh 22,156 1,000 324 Taloqan 18,524 0 Bangi 12,393 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Rostaq 11,094 Baharak 9,523 Darqad 7,893 Returnees from Iran | Annual Trends | Takhar Khwaja Bahawuddin 7,447 27,604 Yangi Qala 6,282 30,000 Dasht-e-Qala 5,802 25,000 21,600 Chahab 5,431 20,000 Warsaj 4,170 14,578 15,000 13,063 11,910 13,002 Namak Ab 3,729

Indviduals 10,000 Farkhar 3,268 Hazar Sumuch 3,148 5,000 Chal 2,454 0 Kalafgan 1,884 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Undocumented Documented Individuals

2012-15 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Returnees from Pakistan | Annual Trends | Takhar

12,000 10,347 10,000 8,000 5,901 6,189 6,000 4,335 4,756

Individuals 4,000 1,848 2,000 0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Undocumented Documented BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 5 ARRIVAL IDPs Arrival IDPs (IDPs) are Afghans who fled from other settlements in Afghanistan and have arrived and presently reside at the Arrival IDPs | Annual Trends | Takhar assessed location / host community, as a result of, or in order to 30,000 25,948 avoid, the effects of armed conflict, generalized violence, human 25,000 rights violations, protection concerns, or natural and human- made disasters. 20,000 15,758 68,358 83% 15,000 Individuals IDPs currently reside displaced due to 10,000 8,711 in host communities conflict 7,770 4,711 5,460 15,272 17% 5,000 IDPs in Taloqan, which displaced by natural 0 hosts the most IDPs disaster 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (22%) 329 76% IDPs reside in informal displaced within their Arrival IDPs by Province of Origin | Takhar settlements (0.5%) home province

16,180 24% Arrival IDPs by District | Takhar

Taloqan 15,272 52,178 76% Darqad 11,596 Khwaja Bahawuddin 6,418 Khwaja Ghar 6,136 Same Province Other Provices Baharak 6,091 Eshkmesh 5,956 Rostaq 4,566 Yangi Qala 2,717 Namak Ab 2,140 Arrival IDPs in Informal Settlements by District | Takhar Chahab 2,130 250 Bangi 2,062 210 Chal 1,330 200 Dasht-e-Qala 999 Hazar Sumuch 322 150 119 Warsaj 294

Individuals 100 Kalafgan 252 Farkhar 77 50 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000

Individuals 0 Chahab Khwaja Ghar 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Arrival IDPs | Shelter | Takhar

0.4%

0.05% 20%

Own House Rented House Host Family Tent 60% 20% Open Air BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 6

+ TOTAL INFLOW [RETURNEES + ARRIVAL IDPs]

Total Inflow (Returnees + IDPs) | Takhar Overall, Takhar province hosts a total inflow of 217,829 returnees and IDPs, of which 69% (149,471) are returnees Taloqan 33,796 and 31% (68,358) are IDPs. The table below shows the 40 Khwaja Ghar 30,409 settlements in Takhar that are most affected by this influx. Eshkmesh 28,112 Darqad 19,489 These 40 settlements (7% of the 540 settlements assessed in Rostaq 15,660 Takhar) host 28% of the province’s returnees and IDPs. These Baharak 15,614 communities are especially fragile and susceptible to social Bangi 14,455 instability induced by this large influx and the subsequent Khwaja Bahawuddin 13,865 competition for limited, already overstretched resources and Yangi Qala 8,999 job opportunities. Chahab 7,561 Dasht-e-Qala 6,801 Top 40 settlements hosting the most Returnees + IDPs Namak Ab 5,869 Rank Settlement District Individuals Warsaj 4,464 Chal 3,784 1 Bolak Taloqan 4,343 Hazar Sumuch 3,470 2 Markaz-e- Baharak Baharak 3,765 Farkhar 3,345 3 Post Khor (1) Taloqan 2,806 Kalafgan 2,136 4 Shahr Kohnna Taluqan Taloqan 2,636 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 5 Lab Koukcha Khwaja Ghar 2,616 Returnees from Abroad Arrival IDPs 6 Markaz Wolluswaly Eshkmesh 2,532 7 Saray Sang Taloqan 2,368 8 Payen Qala Rostaq 2,142 9 Mohajir Qeshalq Taloqan 1,751 Total Inflow (Returnees + IDPs) | Summary by District 10 Takhnabad Chahab 1,692 District Returnees Arrival IDPs Total Inflow 11 Qoum Gozar Afghania Darqad 1,514 Taloqan 18,524 15,272 33,796 12 Deh-i-Mursalan Chal 1,504 Khwaja Ghar 24,273 6,136 30,409 13 Darqad Darqad 1,420 Eshkmesh 22,156 5,956 28,112 14 Nahia 5 Khwaja Bahawuddin 1,367 Darqad 7,893 11,596 19,489 15 Aq Masjed (1) Hazar Sumuch 1,360 Rostaq 11,094 4,566 15,660 16 Chin Za'i (2) Taloqan 1,354 Baharak 9,523 6,091 15,614 17 Shor Toghi Khwaja Bahawuddin 1,325 Bangi 12,393 2,062 14,455 18 Now Abad Kalan Eshkmesh 1,321 19 Kollan Chahab 1,256 Khwaja 7,447 6,418 13,865 Bahawuddin 20 Nahia 3 Khwaja Bahawuddin 1,211 Yangi Qala 6,282 2,717 8,999 21 Subhan Qul Baharak 1,195 Chahab 5,431 2,130 7,561 22 Assli Bad Gozar Eshkmesh 1,191 Dasht-e-Qala 5,802 999 6,801 23 Proja-e-Sharqi Taloqan 1,168 Namak Ab 3,729 2,140 5,869 24 Chah Ab Chahab 1,149 Warsaj 4,170 294 4,464 25 Lala Gozar Khwaja Bahawuddin 1,123 Chal 2,454 1,330 3,784 26 Kaftar Ali (1) Khwaja Bahawuddin 1,116 Hazar Sumuch 3,148 322 3,470 27 Qazaq Bala Taloqan 1,080 Farkhar 3,268 77 3,345 28 Qara Tapa Bala Darqad 1,040 Kalafgan 1,884 252 2,136 29 Kal Toot Bala Darqad 1,031 Grand Total 149,471 68,358 217,829 30 Ganj Ali Taloqan 1,022 31 Qara Tapa Payen Darqad 1,000 32 Qazllaton Khwaja Ghar 982 33 Sarbail Eshkmesh 938 34 Jaw Kado Bala Khwaja Ghar 903 35 Jallayar Khourd Bangi 901 36 Maida Pata Darqad 865 37 Haji Noorullah Khwaja Ghar 862 38 Jaghtahi Khwaja Ghar 861 39 Shair Tala Rostaq 859 40 Gull Bahar Khwaja Bahawuddin 849 Total 60,418 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 7

Total In-Flow (Returnees + IDPs) Total In-Flow (Returnees + IDPs) Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 ,00 ,0 00 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. IDP rn 5, 5,0 0,0 ,00 ,0 < 10 50 1, 2,5 5,0 No - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 10 Total Inflow (Returnees+IDPs) | June 2020 etu 1 1 - > https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 9 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Province of Interest Countries Province District Not Accessible Province: Takhar 1:891,000 0 15 30 60 Khwahan Darwaz-e-Balla

Raghestan

Yawan Shighnan TAJIKISTAN Yangi Qala Chahab Darqad Shahr-e-Buzorg Kohestan Arghanj Khwah Khwaja Bahawuddin Yaftal-e-Sufla

Dasht-e-Qala Fayzabad

Imam Sahib Rostaq Argo Shuhada

Khwaja Ghar Baharak

Dasht-e-Archi Hazar Qala-e-Zal Sumuch Khash

Darayem KUNDUZ Baharak Eshkashem Kunduz Kalafgan Keshem Teshkan Warduj Taloqan BADAKHSHAN Chahar Darah Jorm Khan Abad TAKHAR

Khulm Bangi

Ali Abad Namak Hazrat-e-Sultan Farkhar Chal Ab Tagab Yamgan

Eshkmesh Zebak Aybak

Baghlan-e-Jadid Guzargah-e-Nur SAMANGAN Burka

Fereng Wa Gharu BAGHLAN Warsaj

Returnees From Abroad per District Returnees From Abroad per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Returnees from Abroad | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 9 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Takhar 1:891,000 0 15 30 60 Khwahan Darwaz-e-Balla

Raghestan

Yawan Shighnan TAJIKISTAN Yangi Qala Chahab Darqad Shahr-e-Buzorg Kohestan Arghanj Khwah Khwaja Bahawuddin Yaftal-e-Sufla

Dasht-e-Qala Fayzabad

Imam Sahib Rostaq Argo Shuhada

Khwaja Ghar Baharak

Dasht-e-Archi Hazar Qala-e-Zal Sumuch Khash

Darayem KUNDUZ Baharak Eshkashem Kunduz Kalafgan Keshem Teshkan Warduj Taloqan BADAKHSHAN Chahar Darah Jorm Khan Abad TAKHAR

Khulm Bangi

Ali Abad Namak Hazrat-e-Sultan Farkhar Chal Ab Tagab Yamgan

Eshkmesh Zebak Aybak

Baghlan-e-Jadid Guzargah-e-Nur SAMANGAN Burka

Fereng Wa Gharu BAGHLAN Warsaj

Khuram Wa Sarbagh Pul-e-Khumri Nahrin Koran Wa Monjan Khwaja Hejran Khost Wa Fereng Barg-e-Matal Dahana-e-Ghori NURISTAN Paryan Doshi Deh Salah PANJSHER Andarab Pul-e-Hisar Mandol Districts of return of Returnees from Abroad BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 8 FLED IDPS Fled IDPs are Afghans who have fled from an assessed location Fled IDPs by District | Takhar or settlement within which they previously resided and now currently reside in a different settlement in Afghanistan, as Eshkmesh 18,160 a result of, or in order to avoid, the effects of armed conflict, Khwaja Ghar 17,123 generalized violence, human rights violations, protection Namak Ab 13,738 concerns, or natural and human-made disasters. Rostaq 9,614 Baharak 8,488 Darqad 6,097 106,767 81% Taloqan 5,550 Fled IDPs fled IDPs displaced in Dasht-e-Qala 5,247 Takhar Yangi Qala 4,189 Chahab 4,103 73% 27% Bangi 4,096 displaced due to displaced by natural Chal 3,586 Khwaja Bahawuddin 2,205 conflict disaster Farkhar 1,590 Warsaj 1,227 Hazar Sumuch 1,028 Fled IDPs | Annual Trends | Takhar Kalafgan 726 50,000 46,713 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 45,000 Indviduals 40,000 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 35,000 30,000 25,000 18,641

Individuals 20,000 15,101 15,000 11,275 9,159 10,000 5,878 5,000 0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Total Fled IDPs per District Total Fled IDPs per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Fled IDPs | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 9 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Takhar 1:891,000 0 15 30 60 Khwahan Darwaz-e-Balla

Raghestan

Yawan Shighnan TAJIKISTAN Yangi Qala Chahab Darqad Shahr-e-Buzorg Kohestan Arghanj Khwah Khwaja Bahawuddin Yaftal-e-Sufla

Dasht-e-Qala Fayzabad

Imam Sahib Rostaq Argo Shuhada

Khwaja Ghar Baharak

Dasht-e-Archi Hazar Qala-e-Zal Sumuch Khash

Darayem KUNDUZ Baharak Eshkashem Kunduz Kalafgan Keshem Teshkan Warduj Taloqan BADAKHSHAN Chahar Darah Jorm Khan Abad TAKHAR

Khulm Bangi

Ali Abad Namak Hazrat-e-Sultan Farkhar Chal Ab Tagab Yamgan

Eshkmesh Zebak Aybak

Baghlan-e-Jadid Guzargah-e-Nur SAMANGAN Burka

Fereng Wa Gharu BAGHLAN Warsaj

Khuram Wa Sarbagh Pul-e-Khumri Nahrin Koran Wa Monjan Khwaja Hejran Khost Wa Fereng Barg-e-Matal Dahana-e-Ghori NURISTAN Paryan Doshi Deh Salah PANJSHER Andarab Pul-e-Hisar Mandol Districts of origin of Fled IDPs BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 9 RETURNED IDPS Returned IDPs are Afghans who have returned to their home place Returned IDPs by District | Takhar of origin in the assessed location or settlement from which they had fled as IDPs in the past, as a result of, or in order to avoid, the effects Khwaja Ghar 213,028 of armed conflict, generalized violence, human rights violations, Darqad 98,782 protection concerns, or natural and human-made disasters. Eshkmesh 65,020 Baharak 40,757 Dasht-e-Qala 27,576 513,563 95% Khwaja Bahawuddin 27,085 Returned IDPs returned from other Namak Ab 12,331 locations in Takhar Taloqan 6,635 Bangi 5,117 4 in 5 2 in 5 Chahab 5,102 former IDPs returned of all returned IDPs Yangi Qala 4,480 to only 4 districts: in Takhar returned to Rostaq 3,164 Khwaja Ghar, Darqad, Khwaja Ghar district Chal 2,098 Eshkmesh and Baharak (41%) Warsaj 1,393 Farkhar 469 (81%) Hazar Sumuch 348 Kalafgan 178 Returned IDPs | Annual Trends | Takhar 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 Individuals

197,944 200,000 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

150,000

89,218

Individuals 100,000 75,708 54,280 55,823 50,000 40,590

0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Total Returned IDPs per District Total Returned IDPs Per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Returned IDPs | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 9 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Takhar 1:891,000 0 15 30 60 Khwahan Darwaz-e-Balla

Raghestan

Yawan Shighnan TAJIKISTAN Yangi Qala Chahab Darqad Shahr-e-Buzorg Kohestan Arghanj Khwah Khwaja Bahawuddin Yaftal-e-Sufla

Dasht-e-Qala Fayzabad

Imam Sahib Rostaq Argo Shuhada

Khwaja Ghar Baharak

Dasht-e-Archi Hazar Qala-e-Zal Sumuch Khash

Darayem KUNDUZ Baharak Eshkashem Kunduz Kalafgan Keshem Teshkan Warduj Taloqan BADAKHSHAN Chahar Darah Jorm Khan Abad TAKHAR

Khulm Bangi

Ali Abad Namak Hazrat-e-Sultan Farkhar Chal Ab Tagab Yamgan

Eshkmesh Zebak Aybak

Baghlan-e-Jadid Guzargah-e-Nur SAMANGAN Burka

Fereng Wa Gharu BAGHLAN Warsaj

Khuram Wa Sarbagh Pul-e-Khumri Nahrin Koran Wa Monjan Khwaja Hejran Khost Wa Fereng Barg-e-Matal Dahana-e-Ghori NURISTAN Paryan Doshi Deh Salah PANJSHER Andarab Pul-e-Hisar Mandol Districts of return of Returned IDPs BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 10 OUT-MIGRANTS Out-Migrants are Afghans who have moved or fled abroad from the assessed location, whatever the cause, reason or duration Out-Migrants | Annual Trends | Takhar of expatriation. This category includes refugees, displaced and 50,000 45,867 uprooted people, and economic migrants who have left Afghanistan. 45,000 42,580 40,000 183,928 30,425 35,000 30,000 26,767 fled abroad fled to Europe (17%) 24,230 25,486 25,000 18,998 132,231 20,548 Individuals 20,000 fled to Iran (72%) fled to Pakistan (11%) 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Out-Migrants by District | Takhar

Eshkmesh 30,986 Khwaja Ghar 25,125 Taloqan 24,719 Out-Migrants to Europe & Turkey | Annual Trends | Takhar Bangi 16,065 12,000 11,210 Rostaq 15,804 Baharak 11,153 10,000 Yangi Qala 8,545 8,000 Khwaja Bahawuddin 7,702 Dasht-e-Qala 7,014 6,000 5,288 Chahab 6,641 4,864 4,173 Individuals Darqad 5,954 4,000 3,601 Warsaj 5,935 Farkhar 4,699 2,000 1,289 Hazar Sumuch 4,394 0 Namak Ab 4,208 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Kalafgan 2,553 Chal 2,431

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Individuals Out-Migrants to Pakistan | Annual Trends | Takhar 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 7,000 6,080 6,000

5,000 4,032 Out-Migrants by Country/Region of Destination | Takhar 4,000 2,979 2,969 3,015 140,000 132,231 3,000 Individuals

120,000 2,000 1,473

100,000 1,000

80,000 0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 60,000 Individuals 40,000 30,425 20,548 20,000 0 523 201 0 Out-Migrants to Iran | Annual Trends | Takhar Pakistan Iran Europe Middle East Rest of Asia Other 40,000 including 35,109 Turkey 35,000 30,472 30,000

25,000 19,405 20,000 17,597 17,133

Individuals 15,000 12,515

10,000

5,000

0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ TAKHAR ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 11

International Organization for Migration 17 Route des Morillons P.O. box 17 1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland

International Organization for Migration House #27 4th Street Ansari Square Shahr-e Naw Kabul, Afghanistan

The data used in this report was collected under a collaborative effort by the IOM Afghanistan Mission and the Global DTM support team. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries.

Please visit the DTM Afghanistan web page for more information, including downloadable maps and datasets, as well as interactive maps and dashboards: www.displacement.iom.int-afghanistan

CONTACT US For further information, please contact the DTM Team: [email protected] facebook.com-iomafghanistan twitter.com-iomafghanistan instagram.com-iomafghanistan

in coordination with

DTM in Afghanistan is generously supported by:

Co-funded by the European Union

For more information, please contact: [email protected] www.displacement.iom.int-afghanistan