DOCSLIB.ORG

Constitution in My Briefcase 46.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INDEX — A — consultant to the Interim Commissioner of Nunavut, 462 Abolition of the death penalty, 94, 95 consultant to the Royal Commission approach of the new Solicitor on Aboriginal Peoples, 461 General, 94 opposition to the federal measure central point (spirit of vengeance First Nations’ representatives in rather than justice), 95 London, 284, 285 Criminal Code amendment instituting Pepin-Robarts Commission, 169 a partial trial ban, 94 Accord of April 1981, 286 to 288, 295, issues at stake, 95 301 meeting with opponents, 95 – See also Patriation, Charter and minister’s speech to the House of amending formula Commons, 95 Accord of April 1987 narrow majority, 95 – See Meech Lake Accord Pierre Trudeau’s speech, 95 Accord of June 23, 1987 public debate, 95 – See Meech Lake Accord replacing the sentence for murder, 95 studies on violent crime and murder Accord of November 5, 1981 statistics in Canada and other – See Patriation, Charter and amending countries, 94 formula think-piece on capital punishment, 94 Adhesion clause (opting in) Aboriginal Peoples – See Patriation, Charter and amending aboriginal rights, 259 to 267 formula issues raised after the Accord of Advanced diploma in law (DESD), 35 November 5, 1981, 322, 323 Agence de presse libre du Québec scope of aboriginal rights in the (APLQ) affair Constitution Act, 1982 (s. 35), – See Royal Canadian Mounted Police 331, 332 (RCMP) agreement between the First Nations and Manitoba Hydro, 383, 384 Allaire (Jean) ~ and criminal justice, 134, 135 – See Allaire Committee Beaudoin-Dobbie Committee, 444 Allaire Committee, 432 489 A LIFE IN THE LAW – THE CONSTITUTION AND MUCH MORE Allmand (Warren), 90 to 92, 94, 95, 97, Bennett (William), 186, 291, 299 to 301 101, 103, 111, 123, 124, 126, 132, 265, Biculturalism, 30 379 Blakeney (Allan), 185, 300 Amending formula – See Patriation, Charter and amending Bourassa (Robert), 162, 163, 262, 375, formula 387, 390, 394, 396, 397, 403, 406, 413, 417, 422, 424, 426 to 429, 449, 450 Amendment to the Constitution – See also Charlottetown Accord, Meech – See Charlottetown Accord, Meech Lake Accord Lake Accord, Patriation, Charter and amending formula Broadbend (Ed) Annual Conference of the Association – See Patriation, Charter and amending of Ontario Provincial Court Judges formula (Criminal Division), 336 to 340 Buchanan (John), 186, 301 Association des parents-maîtres du Parc de la Montagne (Hull) — C — – See Living in the Catholic Church Canada Act, 247, 324 — B — Canada Business Corporations Act, 61, 62 Bankruptcy adoption, 62 – See Offi ce of Bankruptcy, Reform of Dickerson Report, 61 the Bankruptcy Act consultations, 62 Bankruptcy trustee interministerial committee, 61 – See Offi ce of Bankruptcy, Reform of reform, 61 the Bankruptcy Act Canada clause (Preamble), 313, 317, Basford (Ron), 57, 59, 63 to 65, 145, 400, 412 to 415, 419, 425, 426, 431, 444, 146, 148, 149 450, 451, 457 Beaudoin-Dobbie Committee, 443 to 446 – See also Charlottetown Accord, Meech chief constitutional adviser, 443 Lake Accord, Patriation, Charter and amending formula public hearings, 443 report and recommendations, 444 to Canada Cooperative Associations Act, 446 61 setting up, 443 Canada round Bélanger-Campeau Commission, 433, – See Charlottetown Accord 438 Canadian Bar Association Bell Canada – See Meeting of the Council of Executive Vice President (Regulation the Canadian Bar Association and Environmental Affairs), 433 (Charlottetown) 490 INDEX Canadian Committee on Reform of federal-provincial negotiations Criminal Justice and Corrections leading to the Accord, 449, 450 – See Ouimet Committee Canada round, 449 Canadian Consultative Council on informal negotiations meetings, 450 Aboriginal Peoples and the Criminal Justice System, 135 major differences, 450 October 26, 1992 referendum on Canadian Declaration of Rights (1960), the Charlottetown proposals, 68, 192, 205 450 Canadian duality clause, 391, 394, 399, Quebec’s refusal to participate, 405, 408, 416, 425 449 Canadian Human Rights Commission, Robert Bourassa signing the 74 Accord, 450 grievances against Prime Minister Canadian Judicial Council, 71, 74 Mulroney, 457 Canadian Penitentiary Service important elements, 451 to 455 – See Ministry of the Solicitor General opponents, 456, 457 positive elements, 458 Canadian Security Intelligence Agency, 133 referendums, 456 to 458 Catholic Church Charter of Rights – See Living in the Catholic Church – See also Patriation, Charter and amending formula Cegep (college) of the Outaouais changes proposed by Jean Chrétien to vice-president, 42 the Joint Committee (January 12, 1981), 254 to 261 Central policy coordinating committee, 86 admissibility of evidence obtained through a violation of the Centre for planning and research in Charter, 259 the area of security, 89 counter-proposal to the amending Charest (Jean) procedure, 260, 261 – See Charest Committee enforcement of rights and freedoms, 259 Charest Committee, 402, 407 to 410 equality rights, 256, 257 Charlottetown Accord, 449, 450, 451 language rights, 257, 258 to 458 multiculturalism, 258, 259 attack of Pierre Trudeau and newly-worded fi rst section of the response of Gordon Robertson, Charter, 254, 255 456, 457 protection against arbitrary failure, 458 detention and imprisonment, causes, 466 256 491 A LIFE IN THE LAW – THE CONSTITUTION AND MUCH MORE protection against unreasonable Chateau consensus, 240 to 242, 286 search and seizure, 255 – See also Patriation, Charter and rights of the Aboriginal Peoples of amending formula Canada, 259, 260 Childhood conformity of the federal legislation, 374 – See Early years implementation, 325 to 327 Chrétien (Jean), 36, 181, 182, 185 to challenge, 346 to 350 187, 189, 195, 197, 201, 211, 214, 230, in force, 329 233, 235 to 237, 252 to 255, 261, 263, popularity of an entrenched Charter, 264, 270, 272, 285, 287, 289, 290, 300, 267 301, 306 to 310, 321, 322, 326, 329, protection with respect to search and 346, 350, 351, 353, 355, 356, 363, 372, seizure (s. 8 of the Charter), 244, 381 to 383, 389, 391, 404, 412, 438, 255 459, 466 Hunter v. Southam Inc. decision, – See also Charlottetown Accord, 353 Department of Justice, Meech Lake referendum (Canada-Quebec Accord, Patriation, Charter and agreement), 304 to 306 amending formula revised Charter at the Ministerial Citizen’s Forum on the Future of meeting in Toronto (August Canada, 435 to 442 11 and 12, 1980), 202 to 206 ~ and media, 442 enforcement of violated rights, big question, 441 204, 205 chairmanship, 437 legal guarantees, 203 challenges and general orientation, “notwithstanding” clause, 205 436 offi cial languages, 205, 206 creation, 437 property rights, 204 letter to Prime Minister Mulroney, restriction to rights, 202, 203 435, 436 rights to non-discrimination, 203, 204 media interview (February 1991), 438, 439 right to manage schools (s. 23 of the Charter), 350 to 352 meetings involving people, 437 situation at the end of summer 1980, members, 437 219 to 225 objectives, 437 to 439 proposals of an offi cials’ sub- platform for citizens, 439 to 442 committee, 222 to 225 recriminations directed at politicians Charter of the French language and the media, 439 “notwithstanding” provision, 294 report and recommendations, 441, obligation to use French exclusively 442 in commercial advertising and tensions between members and the public signage, 391, 392 chairman, 437 492 INDEX Clark (Joe), 100, 177 to 179, 183, 268, Consultations with Canadians, 447, 288, 443, 449 448 – See also Patriation, Charter and constitutional proposals, 447 amending formula group of University of Ottawa professors, 447 Collection of statistical data Network on the Constitution and the federal-provincial collaboration, 107 Information Bulletin, 448 to 110 public consultations in provinces Competition offi cer, 27 (committees or working groups), 447 Constitution Correctional Investigator, 103 – See Charlottetown Accord, Meech Lake Accord, Patriation, Charter and Corrections reform, 104 to 106 amending formula Bill C-51 (1977), 105 Constitutional Acts continuity in the reform process, 106 – See Patriation, Charter and amending MacGuigan Report, 105 formula new framework law for corrections, 106 Constitutional impasse questions discussed in reports, 104 – See also Charlottetown Accord, Meech reports and judicial decisions, 104, Lake Accord, Patriation, Charter and 105 amending formula visits of penitentiaries, 104 to fi nd a way out, 409, 410, 459, 460, Cottage 465 to 476 – See Early years division of powers, 469 to 473 going beyond appearances to Council of the Federation reality, 465 to 468 Pepin-Robarts Commission, 170 main themes of constitutional Criminal Code changes, 468 to 476 complete overhaul (Archambault political initiatives, 466 to 468 Report), 71 reform of the Senate and the Criminal Law Amendment Act (1985), Supreme Court, 474 to 476 371 Omnibus Bill amending the Criminal Constitutional negotiations Code (1969), 69 – See Charlottetown Accord, Meech obscenity, 359 Lake Accord, Patriation, Charter and pornography and prostitution, 360, amending formula 361 Constitutional reform reform of the criminal law, 340 to 346 – See Charlottetown Accord, Meech sentencing, 361 to 363 Lake Accord, Patriation, Charter and submission proposing changes, 177, amending formula 178 493 A LIFE IN THE LAW – THE CONSTITUTION AND MUCH MORE Criminal Justice System Department of Justice – See also Corrections reform, Ministry – See also Patriation, Charter and of the Solicitor General, Reform of the amending formula criminal law changing the role of the Department, fragmentation,
Recommended publications
  • The Cord Weekly (November 19, 1992)

    The Cord Weekly (November 19, 1992)

    THE CORD A WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY STUDENT PUBLICATION VOLUME XXXIII ISSUE 14 NOVEMBER 19 1992 Second Cup gets Champions. the support of over 3000 staff and students few weeks. The current total of Lianne Jewitt by has signatures on both petitions The Second Cup, favoured reached over 3000. and among students, faculty, When asked to comment on staff alike is scheduled to be re- the petitions, Rayner said that he as of December 11, 1992; placed "hasn't seen the petitions." Rayner a petition is being circulated in also said that "we'll consider the or them response to this aspects action. (the petitions)". Director of Exactly what Personnel and The current number will be consider- Administrative ed is uncertain, as Services, Earl Rayner clearly of on signatures states Rayner, said the that the Second reason for re- Cup was of the given a "one placement both petitions has year Second Cup is trial basis", and that it is "costing the decision for their dismissal us too much reached over 3000. "made money to havfc it was this there." Rayner past September." The Lady Soccer Hanks wwn—i the iliwnto, McMaater, St. Mary's, and McQIII, added, "the return It was the Second title. and return to Laurlor aHh the National Cluaipto—tUp - ■ I D<lfc gTOarGO If®** VVGRMfI to the university is hardly cover- Cup's one year anniversary on ing our costs." campus. Rayner has not mentioned WLU student confesses Quite clearly, coffee and hot what will be the replacing popu- chocolate drinkers, and cookie lar coffee cart, but concerned coffee drinkers fear it to in bomb threat campus and muffin eaters' main concern calling will be a university-run establish- with the pending absence of the ment Second Cup is the lack of quality "I think it's terrorism, and certainly deserving of Dean of Student's Pat Brethour secretary, that awaits if a university run ser- by charges," said Fred Nichols, Dean of Students.
  • Housing Corporation

    Housing Corporation

    St. Lawrence & False Creek : A Review of the Planning and Development of Two New Inner City Neighbourhoods CPI #10 U.B.C. J.D. Hulchanski Oct. 1984 nn1• per Scliool o! Com.munity anL1.Re31ona 1 Plann1ng University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia I SSN; 0828-2390 ST. LAWRENCE& FALSE CREEK: A REVIEW OF THE PLANNINGAND DEVELOPMENTOF TWO NEW INNER CITY NEIGHBOURHOODS CPI ff 10 D. Hul chans ki October 1984 U.B.C. PLANNING PAPERS Canadian Planning Issues, #10 University of British Columbia SCHOOLOF COMMUNITY& REGIONAL PLANNING 428, 6333 Memorial Road Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1W5 Canada ST . LAWRENCE AND FALSE CREEK: A REVIEW OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF TWO NEW INNER CITY ~EIGHBOURHOODS John David Hulc hanski Assistant Pr of essor School of Community and Regi onal Planning Universit y of Brit1sn Colombia Vanc ouver October 1984 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was undertaken with the finan cial assistance of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation . Research assistants Leigh Howell, Barbara Maass and Barbara Sanford helped collect data in Toronto and Vancouver. The staff of the City of Toro nt o Housing Department and the False Creek Development Group were especially help­ ful in provid ing full access to necessary research materials. In particular , I wish to thank Keith Ward, Co-ordinator of Program Planning for the City of Toronto Hous i ng Department and Cameron Gray, Develop­ ment Co-ordinator for the False Creek Development Group for their patient and prompt responses to numerous requests for information. While the assistance provided by CMHCand by these individuals and thejr agencies is gratefully acknow­ ledged , the y bear no responsibility for any faults, omissions or for the opinions expressed in this study.
  • A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993

    A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993

    Canadian Military History Volume 24 Issue 2 Article 8 2015 A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 Greg Donaghy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Greg Donaghy "A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993." Canadian Military History 24, 2 (2015) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 GREG DONAGHY Abstract: Fifty years ago, Canadian peacekeepers landed on the small Mediterranean island of Cyprus, where they stayed for thirty long years. This paper uses declassified cabinet papers and diplomatic records to tackle three key questions about this mission: why did Canadians ever go to distant Cyprus? Why did they stay for so long? And why did they leave when they did? The answers situate Canada’s commitment to Cypress against the country’s broader postwar project to preserve world order in an era marked by the collapse of the European empires and the brutal wars in Algeria and Vietnam. It argues that Canada stayed— through fifty-nine troop rotations, 29,000 troops, and twenty-eight dead— because peacekeeping worked. Admittedly there were critics, including Prime Ministers Pearson, Trudeau, and Mulroney, who complained about the failure of peacemaking in Cyprus itself.
  • Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In

    Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In

    BRIEF BY PROFESSOR FRANÇOIS LAROCQUE RESEARCH CHAIR IN LANGUAGE RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PRESENTED TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES AS PART OF ITS STUDY OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES REFORM PROPOSAL UNVEILED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2021, BY THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AND FRENCH: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES IN CANADA MAY 31, 2021 Professor François Larocque Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Ottawa, ON K1J 6N5 Telephone: 613-562-5800, ext. 3283 Email: [email protected] 1. Thank you very much to the honourable members of the Senate Standing Committee on Official Languages (the “Committee”) for inviting me to testify and submit a brief as part of the study of the official languages reform proposal entitled French and English: Towards a Substantive Equality of Official Languages in Canada (“the reform proposal”). A) The reform proposal includes ambitious and essential measures 2. First, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages for her leadership and vision. It is, in my opinion, the most ambitious official languages reform proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“CA1982”)1 and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”),2 which enshrined the main provisions of the Official Languages Act (“OLA”)3 of 1969 in the Canadian Constitution. The last reform of the OLA was in 1988 and it is past time to modernize it to adapt it to Canada’s linguistic realities and challenges in the 21st century. 3. The Charter and the OLA proclaim that “English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.”4 In reality, however, as reported by Statistics Canada,5 English is dominant everywhere, while French is declining, including in Quebec.
  • I – Les Relations Extérieures Du Canada »

    I – Les Relations Extérieures Du Canada »

    Article « I – Les relations extérieures du Canada » Hélène Galarneau et Manon Tessier Études internationales, vol. 21, n° 3, 1990, p. 565-588. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/702704ar DOI: 10.7202/702704ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 13 février 2017 10:33 Chronique des relations extérieures du Canada et du Québec Hélène GALARNEAU et Manon TESSIER* I - Les relations extérieures du Canada (avril à juin 1990) A — Aperçu général Ce trimestre de printemps était encore l'occasion de nombreuses réunions internationales que ce soit celles, récurrentes, du FMI, de la Banque mondiale et de l'OTAN ou celles, ponctuelles, tenues dans le cadre de la Conférence sur la sécurité et la coopération en Europe. Si un trait commun unissait ces rencontres multilatérales, c'est bien celui de l'adaptation aux nouvelles réalités européen­ nes et de ses répercussions sur les alliances militaires ou sur l'économie inter­ nationale.
  • The Limits to Influence: the Club of Rome and Canada

    The Limits to Influence: the Club of Rome and Canada

    THE LIMITS TO INFLUENCE: THE CLUB OF ROME AND CANADA, 1968 TO 1988 by JASON LEMOINE CHURCHILL A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2006 © Jason Lemoine Churchill, 2006 Declaration AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A THESIS I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This dissertation is about influence which is defined as the ability to move ideas forward within, and in some cases across, organizations. More specifically it is about an extraordinary organization called the Club of Rome (COR), who became advocates of the idea of greater use of systems analysis in the development of policy. The systems approach to policy required rational, holistic and long-range thinking. It was an approach that attracted the attention of Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. Commonality of interests and concerns united the disparate members of the COR and allowed that organization to develop an influential presence within Canada during Trudeau’s time in office from 1968 to 1984. The story of the COR in Canada is extended beyond the end of the Trudeau era to explain how the key elements that had allowed the organization and its Canadian Association (CACOR) to develop an influential presence quickly dissipated in the post- 1984 era. The key reasons for decline were time and circumstance as the COR/CACOR membership aged, contacts were lost, and there was a political paradigm shift that was antithetical to COR/CACOR ideas.
  • CONSTITUTION-MAKING AS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS a Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Adam D

    CONSTITUTION-MAKING AS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS a Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Adam D

    CONSTITUTION-MAKING AS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS A Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Adam D. McDonald1, University of Waterloo The Constitution Act, 1982 is a document that profoundly changed the Canadian political landscape. It brought home the highest law of the land; it provided Canadians a mechanism to change their Constitution; it created a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, entrenched within the Constitution, out of the reach of one government. Perhaps its most important legacies, however, are the seemingly permanent isolation of Quebec and the primacy of place in Canadian history it gave Pierre Trudeau. This paper will examine the constitutional history of Canada with a view to determining what made the 1980 negotiating sessions successful when the sessions that led to both the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord were not. It is important, however, to note that the word “successful” is used in the sense that an agreement was reached. Unlike Meech and Charlottetown, the repatriated constitution did not have unanimity among the participants. The question that comes to mind is this: if the governments did not really agree in 1981, why was a Constitution ratified? More importantly, are there lessons that can be drawn from this agreement that can be applied to the failed accords of the Mulroney era? In order to complete this examination, the paper will be divided into two parts. In the first part, Canada’s constitutional story will be told. This is a necessary part of any examination of the constitutional negotiations, for without knowing what the players wanted historically, one cannot see what was changed by the 1980s.
  • Report on Public Forum

    Report on Public Forum

    Anti-Terrorism and the Security Agenda: Impacts on Rights, Freedoms and Democracy Report and Recommendations for Policy Direction of a Public Forum organized by the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group Ottawa, February 17, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................2 ABOUT THE ICLMG .............................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY DIRECTION ..........................................................14 PROCEEDINGS......................................................................................................................16 CONCLUDING REMARKS...................................................................................................84 ANNEXES...............................................................................................................................87 ANNEXE I: Membership of the ICLMG ANNEXE II: Program of the Public Forum ANNEXE III: List of Participants/Panelists Anti-Terrorism and the Security Agenda: Impacts on Rights Freedoms and Democracy 2 __________________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Forum session reporting
  • Le Tabac Ne Rapporte Pas Plus

    Le Tabac Ne Rapporte Pas Plus

    Ut Inàuttnt» Toibt lm Ntdf REVETEMENT km Dodge 4k TOLE EMAILLEE IMS 11 UIRtSLKKÜf **• Mm UMfTI AMM MMCfUTd 822-2424 me: Tel.: (418)872-3738 cw chez ■mMMM 1 7i0. route de l'Aéroport. Somle-7oy J JL! ta citant cfcexxao SOLEIL C P 70, l'Anc*e»»ne-Lo»ette G2I 3M2 QUEBEC 9TE ANNEE NO?* 23 JANVIER 1993 PH*TPS SAMEDI LIVRAISON A DOMICILE [7 JOURS, 3.50 TPS 024 100 PAGES 7 CAHIERS ♦ 1 TA8LOO T VQ 090 4.04 MONTREAL OTTAAA 1.50 ^{Jq 1,35$ T V Q LE SPORT Malgré des hausses de taxes de 118% en cinq ans Le tabac ne rapporte pas plus Les Nordiques tenteront de se reprendre au Colisée QUÉBEC — En cinq ans, soit de 1988 à 1992-93, les taxes Selon des chiffres fournis cigarettes vendues démontré Devant cette situation, les sur un paquet de 25 cigarettes ont augmenté au Québec de Indisciplinés, les Nordiques ont été par le sous-ministre adjoint aux donc clairement qu’une propor­ pressions, particulièrement de 118 %, faisant passer le prix du paquet de 3,35 $ à (>.15 $. Finances Marcel Leblanc, la déclassés surtout au chapitre de la rapidité tion importante de la consom­ l'industrie du tabac, sont nom­ hausse de 118 % des taxes entre d exécution et de la robustesse, a Buffalo, Au cours de la même période, l'assiette fiscale des produits du mation échappé aujourd'hui breuses sur le gouvernement 1988-89 et 1992-93 se lit comme aux taxes, proportion que M. quebecoispour qu’il abaisse et les Sabres font emporte 6-2 S-2 et S-3 tabac du gouvernement du Québec, soit le volume total de cigarettes vendues, était en baisse de 45 %.
  • Campbell Takes Office As Canada's First Female Premier June 26, 1993| from Reuters

    Campbell Takes Office As Canada's First Female Premier June 26, 1993| from Reuters

    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-06-26/news/mn-7402_1_kim-campbell Campbell Takes Office as Canada's First Female Premier June 26, 1993| From Reuters OTTAWA — Kim Campbell, a 46-year-old lawyer, took office Friday as Canada's first female prime minister in a bold bid by the ruling Conservatives to recover popularity in time to win elections this year. Campbell, the first Canadian prime minister born after World War II, promised to restore Canadians' faith in government by bringing in a new generation of leaders to deal with severe unemployment and soaring government deficits. She quickly moved to distance herself from her unpopular predecessor, Brian Mulroney, by slashing the Cabinet size by almost one-third and reshuffling departments to focus on new jobs, public security and maintaining Canada's health service. "It is crucial to close the distance between Canadians and their government," she said after her swearing-in. "Canadians want their government to help them, not hinder them, in the process of economic renewal," she told a news conference. "A smaller Cabinet is a more efficient and more effective instrument to discuss, to decide, to lead." Mulroney retired as Canada's most disliked postwar leader after almost nine years in office to allow a fresh face to lead his party into a general election that must be called by November. Campbell named her main rival for leadership of the Progressive Conservative Party, Quebec native Jean Charest, as her deputy prime minister and minister of industry and consumer affairs. Charest was also charged with regional development in the French-speaking province that is key to winning a majority.
  • Friday, December 5, 1997

    Friday, December 5, 1997

    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 045 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, December 5, 1997 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2787 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, December 5, 1997 The House met at 10 a.m. against three additional candidates for the single opening for another votable bill. However, if we look at the process in more _______________ detail, the Chair is of the opinion that the member will not really suffer any prejudice. Prayers [English] _______________ First, we should note that unlike the draw itself, which is entirely D (1005 ) random, the selection of votable items is based on the merits of the bills or motions put forward by members. Indeed Standing Order PRIVILEGE 92(1) specifically states: PRIVATE MEMBERS’ BUSINESS—SPEAKER’S RULING In making its selection, the Committee—shall allow the merits of the items alone to determine the selection—. The Speaker: Colleagues, I am now ready to render a decision on the question of privilege raised by the hon. member for The merits of the member’s bill are not directly affected by the Sarnia—Lambton on December 4 concerning the draw for Private number of bills being considered by the subcommittee. Members’ Business. It is nonetheless true that the subcommittee is, on occasion, On December 4 the hon. member for Sarnia—Lambton rose on a unable to choose as many votable items as it might like because the question of privilege regarding a random draw to establish an order votable items selected after a previous draw remain in the order of of precedence for additional items on Private Members’ Business.
  • 1866 (C) Circa 1510 (A) 1863

    1866 (C) Circa 1510 (A) 1863

    BONUS : Paintings together with their year of completion. (A) 1863 (B) 1866 (C) circa 1510 Vancouver Estival Trivia Open, 2012, FARSIDE team BONUS : Federal cabinet ministers, 1940 to 1990 (A) (B) (C) (D) Norman Rogers James Ralston Ernest Lapointe Joseph-Enoil Michaud James Ralston Mackenzie King James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent 1940s Andrew McNaughton 1940s Douglas Abbott Louis St. Laurent James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent Brooke Claxton Douglas Abbott Lester Pearson Stuart Garson 1950s 1950s Ralph Campney Walter Harris John Diefenbaker George Pearkes Sidney Smith Davie Fulton Donald Fleming Douglas Harkness Howard Green Donald Fleming George Nowlan Gordon Churchill Lionel Chevrier Guy Favreau Walter Gordon 1960s Paul Hellyer 1960s Paul Martin Lucien Cardin Mitchell Sharp Pierre Trudeau Leo Cadieux John Turner Edgar Benson Donald Macdonald Mitchell Sharp Edgar Benson Otto Lang John Turner James Richardson 1970s Allan MacEachen 1970s Ron Basford Donald Macdonald Don Jamieson Barney Danson Otto Lang Jean Chretien Allan McKinnon Flora MacDonald JacquesMarc Lalonde Flynn John Crosbie Gilles Lamontagne Mark MacGuigan Jean Chretien Allan MacEachen JeanJacques Blais Allan MacEachen Mark MacGuigan Marc Lalonde Robert Coates Jean Chretien Donald Johnston 1980s Erik Nielsen John Crosbie 1980s Perrin Beatty Joe Clark Ray Hnatyshyn Michael Wilson Bill McKnight Doug Lewis BONUS : Name these plays by Oscar Wilde, for 10 points each. You have 30 seconds. (A) THE PAGE OF HERODIAS: Look at the moon! How strange the moon seems! She is like a woman rising from a tomb. She is like a dead woman. You would fancy she was looking for dead things. THE YOUNG SYRIAN: She has a strange look.