165 CHAILLOT PAPER / PAPER CHAILLOT March 2021 collusive states? collusive By Roderick Parkes and Mark McQuay How to cooperate with cooperate to How PROBLEM A WICKED WICKED A
CHAILLOT PAPER / 165 A WICKED PROBLEM | HOW TO COOPERATE WITH COLLUSIVE STATES? European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS)
100, avenue de Suffren 75015 Paris http://www.iss.europa.eu Director: Gustav Lindstrom
© EU Institute for Security Studies, 2021. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated.
The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union.
print ISBN 978-92-9198-962-1 online ISBN 978-92-9198-963-8 CATALOGUE NUMBER QN-AA-20-002-EN-C CATALOGUE NUMBER QN-AA-20-002-EN-N ISSN 1017-7566 ISSN 1683-4917 DOI 10.2815/712662 DOI 10.2815/355434
Published by the EU Institute for Security Studies and printed in Belgium by Bietlot. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021. Cover image credit: Meghan Schiereck/unsplash A WICKED PROBLEM
How to cooperate with collusive states?
By Roderick Parkes and Mark McQuay
CHAILLOT PAPER / 165 March 2021 The editors
Roderick Parkes is the Head of the Alfred von Oppenheim Center for European Policy Stud- ies at the German Council on Foreign Rela- tions (DGAP). His research focuses on issues of international home affairs cooperation. He was educated at the Universities of Edinburgh and Cambridge, as well as the Institut d’études politiques in Grenoble, and received a PhD from the University of Bonn.
Mark McQuay is an independent researcher based in Warsaw. He previously worked as a trainee at the EUISS, working on topics related to EU justice and home affairs. He holds a Mas- ter’s degree in International Relations from Collegium Civitas in Warsaw (2014).
The EUISS Chaillot Paper series
The Chaillot Paper series, launched in 1991, takes its name from the Chaillot hill in the Trocadéro area of Paris, where the Institute’s first premises were located in the building oc- cupied by the Western European Union (WEU). The hill is particularly known for the Palais de Chaillot which was the site of the signing of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, and housed NATO’s provisional head- quarters from 1952 until 1959. 1 CONTENTS
Executive summary 2
Introduction 5 Thinking outside Pandora’s box Scenario 2025 9 Development by crime in the Gulf of Guinea
CHAPTER 1
Where does the EU stand on collusion? 13
CHAPTER 2
Can crime contribute to liberal development? 18
CHAPTER 3
Can the EU engage with collusive states? 32
CHAPTER 4
Can the EU define its futures? 42 Scenario 1 47 A licence to hack in West Africa Scenario 2 56 Post-modern slavery in the Arctic Scenario 3 62 Organ counterfeiting in the Western Balkans Scenario 4 68 A narco-state by choice in the South Pacific Scenario 5 74 The Olympics of Crime in the Middle East
Conclusions 79 Abbreviations 81 2 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On almost every major foreign policy issue, the was hardly exemplary, and that the EU is the EU faces a path-defining choice. It finds itself prime beneficiary of these past misdemean- split between loyalty to longstanding policy ours. They look back to colonial times, and cite principles and a new pressure to pursue its in- dubious European precedents to push the EU terests through value-free realpolitik. Crucial- to abandon its principles and to validate ques- ly, policymakers lack the evidence to weigh up tionable behaviour. the implications of either course - continuity or compromise - and so risk being gripped by Collusion is one such example – and the au- inaction. thors take it as their test case. In increasing numbers, developing economies are turning to Such situations, where policymakers face a criminals to master the challenges of globali- dilemma and lack the evidence to guide their sation, using collusion as “an instrument of choices, are called ‘wicked problems.’1 And a national strategy”.2 They point to past Western failure to solve its wicked problems could leave behaviour as justification. As the 2020s unfold, the EU paralysed on the world stage at a time of and as economic modernisation becomes even huge global change. more strenuous, it is plausible that a majority of states worldwide will actively collude with This Chaillot Paper proposes that the EU tack- criminals, seeing crime and collusion as legit- le such problems by means of a thought exer- imate means to catch up with Europe. cise/experiment. This means posing a series of hypothetical questions in order to explore the The EU’s reading of its history presents suc- potential consequences of policy continuity or cessful development as contingent upon the change and thereby to help the EU realign its expulsion of criminal elements from the body principles and its interests. politic, and at the earliest possible stage. The EU has thereby presented itself with a stark choice: cut ties to collusive states, and push the Facing up to history EU towards splendid isolation; or accommodate them and suffer a loss of self-respect and iden- tity. Few in Brussels, it seems, have thought Somewhat unexpectedly, the greatest contri- to pose the obvious question: can collusion be bution of this paper may be to help policymak- conducive to liberal development? ers in Brussels face up to Europe’s past.
The EU has always viewed its own 70-year de- velopment as setting a path for others to follow Making use of history – based on the assumption that what worked best in the EU, will work best abroad. But rivals, The authors’ method is designed to produce partners and even its own strategists increas- counter-intuitive findings to reconcile the ingly point out that Europe’s past behaviour EU’s interests and principles. It operates on the
1 ‘Wicked problems’ are policy issues which present decision-makers with contradictory political pressures, and where they lack the evidence to evaluate the available options. 2 Philip Zelikow et al., “The Rise of Strategic Corruption: How States Weaponize Graft,” Foreign Affairs, July/August, 2020, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ united-states/2020-06-09/rise-strategic-corruption. Executive summary 3 assumption that Europe’s sometimes murky unspoken and reflexive. Collusion is a case in history can be turned into a treasure trove for point: as far as the authors can ascertain, there practical policy evidence generating ways for are no explicit EU guidelines for dealing with today’s Europeans to engage with the world collusion (unlike the related field of corrup- without betraying their idealistic goals – a way tion). Rather, the EU’s distaste for collusion is out of their ‘wicked problems’. implied from a set of abstract principles drawn from its reading of history about the damage A review of the historical record confirms that inflicted by collusion upon economic -and po European states did indeed rely on criminals litical development. The first step, then, is to and criminal methods on their path to liberal- articulate these hidden assumptions. ism. But this finding – far from paralysing the EU or undermining its values – shows that col- 2. Is there overlooked evidence to contradict lusion is (under specific conditions) a potential the EU’s assumptions? basis for better governance, including when it comes to enforcing laws and redressing the Because the EU has never articulated its as- marginalisation of socio-economic groups and sumption that collusion is uniformly harmful of whole countries. and presents an obstacle to all liberal devel- opment outcomes, it has not actively sought evidence to the contrary. This leaves the EU A three-step thought exercise without evidence to assess the option of condi- tional engagement. As a corrective, the second step is to actively seek out evidence from the But this process is about more than past and present that shows that collusion can re-examining the past. Until lately, the EU’s in fact promote positive outcomes. development promotion represented a perfect melding of the EU’s interests and values. It com- 3. Does this new evidence generate practical bined the EU’s dual character as an interest-led alternatives? ‘market power’. The EU has a strong interest in accessing poorer economies: it needs to expand New evidence is of little use unless translat- its markets and to source raw materials. and a ed into clear policy guidelines. The third step, principled ‘normative power’ requires interna- therefore, is to explore the implications of poli- tional stability and cooperation, and this means cy change – does the scattered evidence gleaned spreading liberal norms. from cases of collusion generate a set of rules coherent enough to challenge the settled as- EU development policy long achieved both sumptions of liberal development theory? The ends. However, a decade of crises has hit the EU outcome should be a set of clear, cohesive and economy hard. Its raw interest in accessing new practical policy recommendations that demon- markets has grown, but its ability to influence strate how the EU can respond to new evidence other nations’ norms and values has shrunk. while staying true to its principles. Economic development no longer guarantees a peaceful, inclusive and democratic global order based on the rule of law. Future scenarios The authors have assembled a process for the EU to face up to uncomfortable truths. It in- Policymakers are understandably reluctant to volves asking three questions: experiment with fields like collusion – in the real world, at least. For this reason, the authors’ 1. What are the EU’s current assumptions method is structured as a counter-intuitive about the effective pursuit of its goals? thought exercise which culminates in the con- struction of a virtual alternative world - a safe Wicked problems tend to emerge when as- space in which to experiment. This virtual world sumptions about effective policy become is brought to life through five scenarios, each of 4 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? which is built to test the following assumptions drawn from the evidence:
> A global increase in crime and collusion is not necessarily a symptom of failed devel- opment. It may even be - under very specific conditions - a requisite for success. Europe’s own historical path to development involved forms of collusion with criminals. And, given that the EU treats Europe’s path as a precedent for others to follow, it should not treat crime solely as an obstacle to liberal development. It must instead draw honest and viable lessons from Europe’s own past.
> EU members are living proof that states are not hindered in fighting crime by past gov- ernment collusion with criminal groups. History suggests that states collude with criminals to improve their capability to gov- ern – to establish a monopoly of violence, access to capital and the authority to make rules. As part of this same drive to establish their administrative monopoly, they logi- cally go on to use these capabilities to fight the same criminals they once colluded with.
> Societies in Europe embraced liberal stand- ards due to a desire for better government, not wealth. Modern-day societies can be expected to accept collusion for the same reasons - if it makes government more re- sponsive. Successful attempts to address the ‘root causes’ of collusion will therefore fo- cus more on sensitising governments to the needs of marginal groups than on raw eco- nomic development.
> EU development policy in Africa and Asia aims to redress the dubious practices of Eu- ropean colonialism, as well as to prevent neo-colonialism by emerging powers. But the liberal development of many of Europe’s own states was super-charged by colonial- ism, and they would not have softened their governance at home without access to over- seas territories. By implication, Europeans ought to explore ways for post-colonial countries to replicate the advantages of co- lonial practice within the current multilat- eral system. 5 INTRODUCTION Thinking outside Pandora’s box
Since 2015, international events have frequent- which would prioritise European interests; but ly split the EU between principle and interests.1 diplomats continued to insist on longstanding That was the year the EU fell prey to a wave of principles – and, again, the EU lacked evidence international terrorism and migration. The to justify a decisive move forward. crisis was unprecedented in its scale. But what made it particularly complex and ‘wicked’ for diplomats was the contradictory political impulses. EU leaders responded to the shock by demanding a more interest-led interna- THE PROBLEM tional strategy, pressing diplomats to engage with authoritarian countries.2 But they pro- OF COLLUSION vided little practical guidance as to how their realist new international priorities should be This issue of collusion has largely subsumed implemented.3 the policy dilemmas of 2015, as EU diplomats have realised just how many of the govern- As the crisis deepened, they pressed the EU to ments they seek to engage in migration and seek border and counter-terrorism deals with counter-terrorism cooperation are themselves countries in Africa, the Middle East and the colluding with people smugglers, militias and Balkans. But longstanding policy principles even terrorist groups. encouraged diplomats to be cautious when dealing with states with questionable records The EU has long known that globalisation cre- on human rights. European leaders, however, ates opportunities for criminals.5 But the grow- began to insist they wanted the EU to engage. ing reports of state involvement in crime have According to some reports, they perhaps also caused it particular dismay. The EU’s support wanted to use development support to sweeten for development was always grounded in the the deal.4 These contradictory instincts creat- hope that partner governments (and multilat- ed gridlock in Brussels, which lacked the ev- eral organisations) would grow stronger and idence to evaluate either course. Since then, the pass the benefits of globalisation on to their estrangement between the EU’s principles and citizens. But these reports suggest they are in interests has only increased. In 2019 political fact growing weaker. Governments to the EU’s leaders renewed their call for a ‘geopolitical EU’ south are colluding with people-smugglers
1 Esther Barbé and Pol Morillas, “The EU Global Strategy: The Dynamics of a More Politicized and Politically Integrated Foreign Policy,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 32, no. 6 (2019), pp. 753-70. 2 Vincent Della Sala and Roberto Belloni, “Realism in the EU: Can a Trans-national Actor be Strategic?” in Roberto Belloni, Vincent Della Sala and Paul Viotti (eds.), Fear and Uncertainty in Europe: The Return to Realism? (London: Palgrave, 2019), pp. 241-65. 3 Karen Smith, “A European Union Global Strategy for a Changing World?”, International Politics, vol. 54 (2017), pp. 503-18. 4 Shoshana Fine, Susi Dennison and Richard Gowan, “False Moves: Migration and Development Aid,” Policy Brief, European Council on Foreign Relations, October 2019, https://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/false_moves_migration_and_development_aid.pdf. 5 Arghya Ghosh, Peter Robertson and Marie-Claire Robitaille, “Does Globalisation Affect Crime? Theory and Evidence,” World Economy, vol. 39, no. 10 (2016). 6 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states?
(and justify this by appealing to the UN’s own achieve its idealistic long-term goals. But this humanitarian values).6 African leaders are ac- is easier said than done. And collusion shows cused of working with embezzlers (unchecked why. Think tanks themselves shy away from the by an African Union recently headed by the one vital question that could resolve the issue: ex-wife of one of the accused).7 And cartels ‘can collusion with criminals ever be “progres- collude with politicians across Latin America sive” – can it be conducive to liberal goals?’ (where Interpol’s own liaison officer was- ar rested on corruption charges).8 Yet the reluctance of policymakers and think tanks to pose this vital question is odd, be- cause the answer in fact seems to be yes: when states are able to harness the talents of crim- inal groups, they really can turn them to the UNDER THE RIGHT common good. For proof, just open a newspa- per. The media are currently full of examples of CONDITIONS, criminal groups proving innovative, agile and responsive to the needs of marginal groups. COLLUSION CAN The Covid-19 pandemic has seen gangs,9 car- tels,10 mafias11 and even religious extremists12 BE PROGRESSIVE step up to mitigate the impact of the virus on their host societies. At present, the EU is gridlocked on how to en- gage with collusive states. It is in the EU’s in- The way ahead seems simple. The EU merely terest to accommodate collusive states – the EU has to remarry its principles with its interests, needs global development for economic rea- that is: to become more hard-headed about sons, needs nearby states as allies in controlling how to achieve its idealistic long-term goals.13 migration, and needs to defend its ‘turf’ from But this is easier said than done. And collusion China, Russia and even the US. But its principles shows why. tell it collusion is harmful and undermines its long-term liberal ideals. Other European think Over the past decades, journalists and academ- tanks have contended that the way to reconcile ics have catalogued many individual cases in EU interests and values is simple: the EU merely which crime-state collusion has led to liberal has to become more hard-headed about how to outcomes. They have described the potential
6 Frontex, the EU borders agency, envisages the emergence of new forms of ‘smuggler-states’, that is, states captured by smugglers. Its draft strategic risk analysis (SRA) draws on: Federico Varese, Mafias on the Move: How Organized Crime Conquers New Territories (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011). For more information on the SRA exercise, see: https://frontex. europa.eu/intelligence/strategic-analysis/. 7 “The State Capture Papers,” Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, February 24, 2020, https://www.occrp.org/en/the- state-capture-papers/. 8 Andrea Diaz and Jessica Campisi, “Mexico Goes to the Polls this Weekend. 132 Politicians Have Been Killed Since Campaigning Began, Per One Count,” CNN, July 2, 2018, https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/27/americas/mexico-political-deaths-election- season-trnd/index.html; Brendan Pierson, “Jurors in ‘El Chapo’ Trial Told of Mexico’s Drug Wars, Corruption,” Reuters, November 15, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-mexico-el-chapo/jurors-in-el-chapo-trial-told-of-mexicos- drug-wars-corruption-idUSKCN1NK2V3. 9 Caio Barretto Briso and Tom Phillips, “Brazil Gangs Impose Strict Curfews to Slow Coronavirus Spread,” The Guardian, March 25, 2020, https://www.theguardian. com/world/2020/mar/25/brazil-rio-gangs-coronavirus. 10 Vanda Felbab Brown, “Mexican Cartels Are Providing COVID-19 Assistance. Why That’s Not Surprising.” Brookings, April 27, 2020, https://www.brookings.edu/ blog/order-from-chaos/2020/04/27/mexican-cartels-are-providing-covid-19-assistance-why- thats-not-surprising/ 11 Lorenzo Tondo, “Mafia Distributes Food to Italy’s Struggling Residents,”The Guardian, April 10, 2020, https://www.theguardian. com/world/2020/apr/10/mafia- distributes-food-to-italys-struggling-residents. 12 Ruchi Kumar, “Taliban Launches Campaign to Help Afghanistan Fight Coronavirus,” Al Jazeera, April 6, 2020, https://www. aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/taliban- launches-campaign-afghanistan-fight-coronavirus-200406055113086.html. 13 Sven Biscop, “The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European Characteristics,” , Security Policy Brief, no. 75, Egmont Institute, Brussels, June 2016, http://www. egmontinstitute.be/content/uploads/2016/06/SPB75.pdf ?type=pdf. Introduction 7 benefits for development and peacebuilding of Consequently, local communities were more accommodating criminals – of “hybridity”,14 loyal to smugglers than to the Nigerien state. “dirty deals”15 and “bribing for peace”.16 And But the government successfully incorporated they have warned that purist development pol- them in an ‘informal power-sharing’ system in icies have often backfired, undermining public 1991, which is credited with bringing peace and administration and inviting corrosive crime. employment.18 Northerners were permitted to Too often, academics say, fragile states have conduct smuggling activities while occupying eschewed criminal partnerships, relying in- official positions and the state levied taxes on stead on the support of Western donors who fail migrants.19 Western efforts to crack down on to fully understand their needs.17 The result: smugglers risked undermining development. these weak states fell into the hands of militias and rent-seeking elites. So if the yardstick is And yet such lessons remain taboo. Western the achievement of inclusive and responsive policymakers would rather be seen to do the public institutions, then the signs are clear: un- ‘right thing’ on collusion than act upon such der the right conditions, crime and collusion counter-intuitive findings.20 Cooperating with can be ‘progressive’. collusive states is taboo, and that is what makes collusion such a wicked prob- Moreover, Western diplomats ooperating lem. This paper seeks to account know this. They could probably for mental blockages on the part even cite examples from their C with collusive of policymakers in ways that own work. One common example states is taboo, and academics seldom take into ac- concerns their recent attempts that is what makes count. They would rather berate to crack down on people smug- collusion such a Western policymakers for their gling in the Sahel. The north of ignorance and self-defeating Niger has traditionally been set- wicked problem. policies than help them draw tled by nomadic traders. The im- practical lessons.21 They seem to position of borders there – first make a point of crediting posi- by colonial powers and later by a distant Nige- tive outcomes to states that go against West- rien government – disrupted this way of life. ern ‘best practice’ rather than showing where
14 Syaifu Anam, “Peacebuilding: The Shift towards a Hybrid Peace Approach,” Global & Strategis, vol. 9, no. 1 (2015), pp. 37-48. 15 Rachel Kleinfeld, A Savage Order: How the World’s Deadliest Countries Can Forge a Path to Security (New York: Pantheon Books, 2018), pp. 101-121. 16 Yuliya Zabyelina and Jana Arsovska, “Rediscovering Corruption’s Other Side: Bribing for Peace in Post-conflict Kosovo and Chechnya,” Crime Law and Social Change, vol. 60, no. 1 (2013), pp. 1-24. 17 Willemijn Verkoren and Bertine Kamphuis, “State Building in a Rentier State: How Development Policies Fail to Promote Democracy in Afghanistan,” Development and Change, vol. 44, no. 3 (May 2013), pp. 501-26. 18 Luca Raineri, “Cross-border Smuggling in North Niger: The Morality of the Informal and the Construction of a Hybrid Order,” in Abel Polese, Alessandra Russo and Francesco Strazzari (eds.), Governance Beyond the Law: The Immoral, The Illegal, The Criminal, International Political Economy Series (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019), pp. 227-46. 19 A 2015 European Commission study recognised that between 2003 and 2008, Nigerien authorities levied between CFA 850 million and CFA 3.5 billion in illegal taxes per year from migrants passing through the city of Agadez alone. See: European Commission, DG Migration & Home Affairs, “A study on smuggling of migrants: Characteristics, responses and cooperation with third countries,” Brussels, September 2015. 20 They explain that European voters will withdraw support for EU actions if these are thought to fuel crime and corruption: Europeaid, “Promoting Anti-corruption in EC Development Cooperation,” Fact Sheet, 2009, https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/ pubaideffect/documents/promoting-anti-corruption-ec-development- cooperation. 21 For analysis see: Peter Andreas and Ethan Avram Nadelmann, Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006). 8 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? the West can help.22 By contrast, this Chaillot Paper tries to free policymakers from taboos. A thought exercise to challenge It frames the issue as a thought experiment, implicit policy assumptions employing the methods of strategic foresight to create a virtual (yet true-to-life) setting for testing new policy ideas. The aim of this paper is to untangle this wicked problem by identifying a way for Even with evidence-based policy recommenda- the EU to pursue its interests in a messy tions, policymakers are understandably nerv- world while staying true to its idealistic ous about trying out alternative policies. Thus, goals. It does this by means of a three-step the culmination of this three-step thought thought exercise designed to re-examine exercise is to use scenario-building to create a the EU’s core policy principles. safe space in which to test alternative policies and experiment with breaking taboos. Locating the EU’s policy on collusion
The EU has no explicit guidelines for dealing with collusion, relying instead on a set of abstract principles about the damage collusion inflicts upon economic and political development. The first step, therefore, is to articulate these hidden assumptions.
Reviewing the evidence
Because the EU has never articulated its assumptions about collusion, it has nev- er looked into the alternative. The sec- ond step, therefore, is to actively seek out contradictory evidence suggesting that collusion can in fact promote posi- tive outcomes.
Drawing policy implications
New evidence is of little use unless translated into practical policy recom- mendations. The third step, therefore, is to examine the implications of policy change and to build an alternative ap- proach that both responds to the evi- dence and remains true to principles.
22 See, for example: Dispanadda Diskul, Ramrada Ninnad, Andrea Skinner. and Visitorn Rajatanarvin, “Development Not Drug Control: The Evolution of Counter Narcotic Efforts in Thailand,”Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, vol. 1, no. 1 (2018), pp. 80-8; Volker Boege, Anne Brown, Kevin Clements and Anna Nolan, “On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: What is Failing – States in the Global South or Research and Politics in the West?,” Berghof Handbook for Conflict Transformation Dialogue Series, vol. 8 (2009), pp. 13-15. Likewise, negative outcomes are attributed to ‘Western interference’. For analysis, see, for example: Roland Paris, “Saving Liberal Peacebuilding,” Review of International Studies, vol. 36, no. 2 (2010), pp. 337-65; Solveig Richter and Natasha Wunsch, “Money, power, Glory: The Linkages between EU Conditionality and State Capture in the Western Balkans,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 27, no. 1 (2020), pp. 41-62. Introduction 9
times, when its justice sector was dominated SCENARIO 2025 by a single ethnic group. Now, at long last, the police and judiciary are beginning to open up Development by crime their ranks to the full range of social elements.’ The media hail a new age of Chinese-inspired in the Gulf of Guinea development: Western development policy ‘has only fuelled inequality and corruption’. In 2025, an international partnership is China offers an alternative. Its engagement is launched in a West African state, only a few no longer simply about extracting resources; hours flight from the EU. Its centrepiece: a pro- Beijing has shown that its model of governance ject to strengthen the country’s justice system offers a viable alternative. Moreover, this is not and so boost development. The Chinese am- just propaganda: the project has really begun to bassador, speaking against the vast blue back- show signs of success. The local justice sector drop of the Atlantic Ocean, proclaims that this really is becoming more inclusive, the power of Beijing-sponsored project will embrace “local the cartels is dwindling and legitimate liveli- community justice mechanisms”, making the hoods are beginning to emerge. country’s court system “more efficient and more attuned to grassroots culture”. His care- What triggered the crisis? fully chosen words disguise a worrying ele- ment: the initiative relies on two violent drug The story began four months earlier, when a cartels to dispense ‘justice’. And the cartels’ swarm of civilian drones loaded with impro- bosses have been nominated as ‘community el- vised explosive devices (IEDs) buzzed over the ders’, tasked with ensuring compliance within country’s capital and descended on its central their own ethnic group. prison, ripping through its east wing, eviscer- ating inmates and destroying a pop-up drug The EU ambassador is asked for her opin- lab inside. The victims were members of the ion by local journalists, and unintentionally Coronthie cartel; and the attack was the latest sparks a diplomatic crisis. She dismisses Chi- in a series of reprisals in their feud with the na’s ‘hybrid governance project’ as an excuse Boussoura cartel. The two had only recent- to formalise corrupt local practices, in a bid to ly opened hostilities: for years, they had been ensure that the fragile West African state re- too busy fending off police violence and indis- mains a pliant trading outpost for Beijing. This criminate arrests to fight one another. In pris- is not just neo-colonialism, she says, but also on, they initially thrived together, conducting neo-orientalism: here is an Eastern power re- business and recruiting from the pool of in- ifying backward practices in Africa. The issue mates languishing in pre-trial detention. Only is soon picked up at the highest political levels as their numbers swelled in the overcrowded in the EU, where one firebrand leader suggests prison had tensions mounted. it poses a threat to Europe’s judicial integrity: ‘It won’t be long before West African diaspo- Shortly before the attack, the Coronthie cartel ra groups here are demanding recognition for had been confined to a separate wing, a fact tribal law’ and ‘Chinese-backed gangsters start exploited by the Boussoura and their deadly clamouring to decide on Europe’s own justice drones.1 But, ironically, when security services standards’. arrived on the scene, the two cartels seemed to forget their differences. Both cartels draw their Chinese state media counter that West Afri- members from the marginalised Malinké eth- ca is ‘finally overcoming the legacy of colonial nic group; the police are mainly Fulani.2 Faced
1 Similar segregation methods have been used in Latin American prisons. See: “Prisons in Latin America: A journey into Hell,” The Economist, September 22, 2012, https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2012/09/22/a-journey-into-hell. 2 The Fulani’s prominence is a legacy of colonialism, which left them richer and more influential than other ethnic groups in the country. 10 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? with an onslaught from the security services, What was the EU’s initial New vulnerabilitiesNew vulnerabilities prisoners from the two gangs united. Togeth- S ppl hai s or sti la t r s to Chi a response? Supply chains for stimulant drugs to China er, the prisoners raided the prison armoury and pursued the police back to their compound. Che i al pro tio h Two weeks after the prison attack, EU leaders Across the whole country citizens watched the r pro tio h met at their regular June summit. It was the footage, struggling to believe that the country’s Tra sit state first time West Africa had been on the agenda E ar et formidable police force was being routed. The for some time: increasingly, the fallout from president – also Fulani – was forced to beg for problems in that region spread south across moderation and clemency. sub-Saharan Africa and west into Latin Ameri- 中华人民共和国 ca, not north across the Mediterranean. None- The riot in the prison compound was bloody, theless, the EU still considered West Africa to be but the real aftermath played out on the streets 欧盟 its backyard, so leaders were stung by the tone - of Brussels. West African community groups of international criticism, especially from the descended on the EU’s Commission headquar- region itself. The EU Development Commis- ters demanding that it do more. EU develop- sioner reported that the violence pointed to a ment policy had recently begun to focus on lack of investment in the country’s judicial sys- 菲律宾人 boosting European exports to Africa and one of tem. The court system was gridlocked, and the 尼加拉瓜 its most successful export areas had been raw cartels had been able to recruit heavily in pris- chemical products. Protestors complained that ons because they were full of Malinké trapped these chemicals were falling into the hands of in perpetual pre-trial detention. the cartels, which used them to produce syn- thetic drugs for consumers in the Americas. The 澳大利亚 The Commissioner’s proposal was for a pro- African Union (now heavily financed by China) gramme of judicial automation across West Af- lodged a formal complaint against the EU. And rica, using artificial intelligence (AI) tools first one outspoken Latin American ambassador re- developed in Europe during the 2021 migration inforced the message, calling on Europe “to re- crisis, when the EU was trying to speed up asy- think its principles”. lum decisions.3 The West African Automatic Sentencing Processor (WAASP), the commis- sioner claimed, would unblock the courts, while simultaneously reducing administrative costs and helping curb systemic corruption.4 But the African Union rejected the EU’s insin- uation that the root cause of the crisis lay in West Africa. And local critics soon pointed to the WAASP’s inherent cultural, racial and class biases,5 showing that its software perpetuat- ed the kind of discrimination already endemic within the local security services.
With the WAASP failing to take flight, the West African state had reached out to its own pre- ferred partner – Beijing. China had already turned the country into a major maritime trans- port hub, a channel to suck up West Africa’s
3 During this second wave of irregular migration, EU governments automated the early stages of the asylum process to prevent sub-Saharan immigrants abusing a gridlocked system to disappear into Europe’s underground economy. 4 Vyacheslav Polonski, “AI is Convicting Criminals and Determining Jail Time, but Is It Fair?,” World Economic Forum, November 19, 2018, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/algorithms-court-criminals-jail-time-fair/. 5 Bias has been a common critique of AI sentencing in the US: Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu et al., “Machine Bias,” ProPublica, May 23, 2016, https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. Introduction 11
New vulnerabilitiesNew vulnerabilities S ppl hai s or sti la t r s to Chi a Supply chains for stimulant drugs to China
Che i al pro tio h r pro tio h Tra sit state E ar et
中华人民共和国
欧盟
菲律宾人 尼加拉瓜
澳大利亚
mineral wealth6 and a potential stop-off point one side are the liberals, who argue for prin- for shipping destined to cross the new Nicara- cipled disengagement from the region. They gua canal en route to Asia.7 Now Beijing focused suggest that EU engagement, no matter how on the country’s politico-economic develop- well-intentioned, has backfired. Economic ment: increasingly aware of worldwide prob- modernisation and governance reform have lems with transnational crime, terrorism and given rise first to crime and then to deep social migration, it saw that connectivity entailed a tensions, borne out in the failure of the WAASP. risk. Its new sea links could expose it to threats They argue that the EU should get its own house emanating from West Africa, Latin America in order, concentrating on protecting the rule of and even Europe itself. Seeking to reduce this law at home in the face of transnational threats. vulnerability, Beijing took its first steps into On a rare optimistic note, they say that the Chi- state-building. nese project indicates that emerging powers might take a more responsible approach to de- What lessons does the EU velopment if only the EU would stop doing the draw from the crisis? heavy lifting on their behalf.
Once the dust has settled on the Chinese pro- Opposition comes from Europe’s realists. They ject, the political fallout reaches Brussels. On contend that principled disengagement is not
6 Neil Hume, “China Consortium Wins Rights to Develop Guinea Iron Ore Deposit,” Financial Times, December 2, 2019, https:// www.ft.com/content/6729b63c-12d3-11ea-a225-db2f231cfeae. 7 Nicholas Muller, “Nicaragua’s Chinese-Financed Canal Project Still in Limbo,” The Diplomat, August 20, 2019, https:// thediplomat.com/2019/08/nicaraguas-chinese-financed-canal-project-still-in-limbo/. 12 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? an option: it will only leave Africa prey to a predatory China. Years of liberal EU develop- ment policy have succeeded only in spreading wealth (and power) to other parts of the globe, including rapacious powers in the east. The EU should leverage its remaining power to drive forward economic development in key mar- kets, pushing partner states to comply with its own regulatory standards. Unless it acts deci- sively to protect its interests and find new ways of deal-making with elites in Africa, the EU will face a much bigger threat. China has already begun to cast European standards as part of the problem: how long before Beijing is pressing the EU to align with Chinese regulations?
A small contingent of policy advisers point to a third way: the possibility of the EU engaging in the messy politics of West Africa and remaining true to its liberal principles. In fact, they say, China’s engagement with the cartels points the way. Not only is its ‘hybrid’ justice system in West Africa an objective success, the contours of the project trace a distinctly European line. Liberalism in Europe was born of a similar pro- cess of state-building through crime and collu- sion. With a better understanding of why states enter into relationships with drugs cartels, the EU too can begin to offer a viable alternative. Sadly, these arguments prove unpalatable to EU decision-makers. 13 CHAPTER 1 WHERE DOES THE EU STAND ON COLLUSION?
The scenario presented in the previous pages, it goes without saying. This is certainly how EU set in the Gulf of Guinea in 2025, shows how officials behave in the 2025 scenario, taking it crime-state collusion will challenge the EU’s as given that China’s bargain with the cartels principles and interests in the coming years. In is a bad thing. And yet, exactly this kind of in- the scenario, one of the EU’s partners in Africa ferred policy assumption is what gives rise to seeks ways to collude with drug cartels to en- wicked problems. Herein lies the authors’ mo- force laws and provide justice. It acts partly out tivation for exploring the issue. of duress and partly in the belief that collusion with criminal gangs will bring tangible benefits ‘Collusion’ and ‘corruption’ are both pro- to society. But the move implacably divides EU foundly negative phenomena and yet they are policymakers. And the gridlock in Brussels in not the same. The latter infers a state of decay, turn opens the door for another outside power and carries exclusively negative connotations.2 to step in and formalise a fitting system of hy- But not every public official who partners with brid governance. Future scenarios such as this illicit actors does so for private gain, weaken- one suggest that the EU already needs to re- ing the state by misappropriating its resourc- think its policy on collusion and development. es. Moreover, even when public officials do And that in turn begs the question: what is the gain personally from criminal relationships, EU’s policy on collusion? this does not rule out the possibility of wider public benefits.3 The term ‘collusion’ can ap- The obvious place to look for guidance is the ply to those rare occasions where crime is used 2016 European Union Global Strategy (EUGS), in pursuit of state-building or carries broad- the EU’s overarching foreign policy strategy. er social benefits. The conflation of these two Although an explicit mention of collusion is not overlapping but rather different phenomena is to be found there, the strategy does reference reductionist, and by only partially framing the crime and corruption more than ten times – issue, the EU may be ignoring evidence to block always as the targets of a clear-cut ‘fight’ by out an inconvenient truth. the EU.1 So European diplomats can logical- ly infer from the strategy that the problem of The EU really ought to consider such ideas when state-crime collusion is likewise something to creating development policies. Evidence-based be stamped out, an issue so black and white that policymaking entails a duty to question even the
1 European External Action Service, “Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy”, Brussels, 2016, https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web. pdf. 2 Camila Vergara, “Corruption as Systemic Political Decay,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol.47, no.3 (2019), https://doi. org/10.1177/0191453719868265. 3 Kendra Koivu, “Illicit Partners and Political Development: How Organized Crime Made the State,” Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 53 (2018), pp. 47-56. 14 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? firmest assumptions and to probe the -possi itself in the world. And they explain the very bility to achieve idealistic goals by ‘value-free’ motif which still guides the EU’s foreign and means.4 In this case, that would mean asking development policy – the notion of being sur- whether crime and collusion can ever be ‘pro- rounded by four ‘concentric circles’ of partners. gressive’, whether collusion can be conducive to liberal outcomes in partner countries, and whether EU development policy has the means Precedent to harness collusion to this end. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence that suggests that crime This is the principle that the EU’s own develop- can indeed boost public administration, that it ment sets a precedent for others to follow. The is sometimes the only means by which govern- EU’s highly-advanced model of governance has ments can function, and that it allows adminis- produced extraordinary results at home. Thus, trators to access resources and capabilities that the EU will achieve the best results abroad if it would otherwise be out of reach. But, it seems, applies the same model there too. This means the EU does not avail itself of this evidence. asserting in the outside world the same tough line on crime-state relationships that the EU takes within its borders.8 Incidentally, this no- tion also explains why the EU seems to picture itself at the centre of neat rings of concentric THE EU’S FOUR CORE circles: it expects its economic and political norms to suffuse outwards, one ring at a time.9 POLICY PRINCIPLES This points to the fact that there is some gra- dation in EU policy on collusion: the EU has the The authors believe that the EU’s stance on highest expectations of its nearest neighbours, collusion (and on many other internation- namely the ‘enlargement’ and ‘neighbourhood’ al issues) is instead based on four largely im- states. This is not only due to their geographical plicit principles that reflect its understanding proximity to the EU; it also takes into account of how best to achieve its liberal international their governance capacity and their prosperity. goals. They are the ‘four P’s’: precedent,5 pro- gress, problem-solving6 and the past.7 And they are the central focus of our three-step thought exercise. It is these principles, after all, that Progress would need to change if the EU were to replace its implicit distaste for collusion with some- The EU appears to act on the belief that global thing more explicitly accepting of it. Such a progress involves step-by-step convergence change would, moreover, be extremely difficult around Western norms in general and the EU as these principles suffuse every aspect of EU model in particular. As a result, the EU plac- foreign policy. They not only define its policy es considerable expectations in nearby states, on collusion; they reflect how the EU pictures which have the greatest capacity to adopt its
4 Karl Popper, The Poverty of Historicism (London: Routledge, 1957); Milton Friedman, “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953). 5 Among many examples: Jan Zielonka, “Europe’s New Civilizing Missions: The EU’s Normative Power Discourse,” Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 18, no. 1 (2013), pp. 35-55. 6 Georges Tapinos, “Migration, Trade and Development: The European Union and the Maghreb Countries,” in R. King, G. Lazaridis and C. Tsardanidis (eds.), Eldorado or Fortress? Migration in Southern Europe (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000), pp. 277-97. 7 Ian Manners, “Global Europa: Mythology of the European Union in World Politics,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 48, no. 1 (2010), pp. 67-87. 8 European Commission, “EU Anti-corruption Report,” Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM(2014) 38 final, Brussels, February 3, 2014. 9 Michael Emerson, “Just Good Friends? The European Union’s Multiple Neighbourhood Policies,” International Spectator, vol. 46, no. 4 (2011), pp. 45-62. CHAPTER 1 | Where does the EU stand on collusion? The concentric 15 standards. The EU’s neighbours in the West- Thecircles concentric model circles model ern Balkans retain strong crime-fighting -ca pabilities developed by their security services EUROPEAN UNION during the Cold War. Moreover, the EU has in- vested billions of euro in improving their ad- ENLARGEMENT CANDIDATES ministrative capacity under its Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance. Accordingly, the EU NEIGHBOURHOOD expects these states to ensure collusion-free public administration. It makes similar de- mands of its other neighbours, promoting AFRICA, CARIBBEAN & anti-corruption efforts in Georgia, Moldova PACIFIC ACP and Ukraine, among others. Elsewhere, par- ticularly in post-colonial settings and poorer states, it appears somewhat more resigned to 10 crime-state relationships. LATIN AMERICA & ASIA
Problem-solving
The EU’s development policy suggests it be- lieves it is possible to solve governance prob- lems in almost any place and culture. It appears to act on the belief that its model is universally applicable and can lift obstacles using econom- ic tools.11 Consequently it defines the focus of cases of deviant behaviour, the EU also uses its development aid as ‘the reduction and … negative economic tools such as trade condi- eradication of poverty’,12 reasoning (presuma- tionality and economic sanctions to affect so- bly) that increased prosperity will lead to better cial standards and voter behaviour.15 governance and the spread of liberal outcomes. It generally focuses its economic aid on those countries with the lowest World Bank income The past status.13 Its preferred tools are positive ones such as job creation, training programmes and The colonial past of five of its six founding private sector investment, and it uses prefer- members bestows on the EU a general obliga- ential trading relations to give a leg-up to the tion to engage in even distant parts of Africa and world’s least developed countries (LDCs).14 In
10 In Afghanistan, for example, one official alleged that “the [EU] line was ‘[corruption is] a national issue. It does not concern us. We can provide funding.” See: Mark Pyman, Corruption: Lessons from the International Mission in Afghanistan, Transparency International UK, February, 2015, p. 41. 11 Hein de Haas, “The Myth of Invasion: The Inconvenient Realities of African migration to Europe,” Third World Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 7 (2008), pp. 1305-22; Op. cit., “False Moves: Migration and Development Aid”. 12 Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2016), Article 208. 13 “Middle-Income Countries Must Take Responsibility for Their Own Poor, Says Development Committee,” European Parliament News, July 11, 2012, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20120709IPR48497/middle-income-countries-must- take-responsibility-for-their-own-poor. 14 In 2007, the EU adopted its Aid for Trade Strategy, which aimed to integrate LDCs into the global trading system. The Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) is a mechanism adopted under this strategy to allow LDCs to pay reduced duties on exports to the EU. In addition, ‘everything but arms’ (EBA) agreements between the EU and LDCs allow them full tariff-free access for all exports except arms and ammunition. When states graduate from LDC status, they are given a three-year transition period to adapt to the end of the scheme. 15 A recent example of such sanctions is Cambodia, whose EBA was partially suspended in February 2020. See: Human Rights Watch, “Cambodia: EU Partially Suspends Trade Preferences”, February 13, 2020, https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/02/13/cambodia-eu- partially-suspends-trade-preferences. 16 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states?
Asia, and to embrace the constraints imposed on raison d’état by the post-war multilater- Opening Pandora’s box al order. This plays out in the two outer rings of states in its concentric circles model.16 The EU lavishes the most attention on a confection It can be a risky business to rethink prin- known as ‘Africa-Caribbean-Pacific’ (ACP), ciples on any matter. But collusion opens which includes the majority of states decolo- a veritable Pandora’s box. If the EU did nised after 1945. The outermost ring comprises accommodate collusive states it would Latin America and Asia, where this responsi- seem to acknowledge that its values are bility is ‘shared’ with local organisations and not in fact universal and that its own par- third powers. The EU appears to accept that ticular understanding of crime is little crime-state relationships may be a legacy of more than an accident of history. Its ri- colonialism, but it opposes these on the ba- vals already point out that, when it comes sis that crime could easily overwhelm already to crime and punishment Europeans weak public administrations. And it uses de- have not always been on ‘the right side velopment aid and support for multilateral or- of history’. Practices such as child labour, ganisations to crowd out competitors like China slavery and privateering were once read- that might undermine these constraints.17 ily accepted, whereas blasphemy, homo- sexuality and witchcraft were at times deemed criminal.1 Even today, there is a vibrant debate in Europe about wheth- er certain forms of behaviour are really criminal. And one of the great obstacles to EU justice cooperation is the fact that practices illegal in one member state may not be in another.2
Presumably these rivals and malcontents – Russia, China, even North Korea – would quite like the EU to bend and em- brace moral relativism. They would use any acknowledgement of Europe’s past sins as a licence for crime. Whole swathes of the globe that EU foreign and develop- ment policy is ‘moralising’ and towards which it deploys double standards and an
1 Transform: Drug Policy Foundation, “Drug Decriminalisation in Portugal: Setting the Record Straight”, November 14, 2018, https:// transformdrugs.org/drug-decriminalisation-in- portugal-setting-the-record-straight/. 2 On the problem of ‘dual criminality’, see: 16 William Brown, “Restructuring North-South Relations: European Commission, “Communication to the ACP-EU Development Co-operation in a Liberal Council and the European Parliament: Mutual International Order,” Review of African Political Economy, Recognition of Final Decisions in Criminal vol. 27, no. 85 (2000), pp. 367-83. Matters,” COM(2000) 495 final, Brussels, July 26, 2000. 17 Maurizio Carbone, “The European Union and China’s Rise in Africa: Competing Visions, External Coherence and Trilateral Cooperation,” Journal of Contemporary African Studies, vol. 29, no. 2 (2011), pp. 203-21. CHAPTER 1 | Where does the EU stand on collusion? 17
attitude of ‘do as we say, not as we did’.3 A Nor is the aim of this study to redefine the similar moral relativism can be found even EU’s current idealistic international goals. among academics. Ottorino Cappelli, if the It seeks merely to test whether the EU can authors interpret him correctly, cautiously better achieve them by a conditional accom- welcomes Moscow’s mafia connections on modation of collusion – to test whether this the grounds that violent authoritarianism might be a means to overcome cultural spe- was a stepping stone that European states cificities, ensure that collusive states adopt took – “the essential ground on which more European norms and, above all, to reduce autonomous and capable modern states global crime. Like Cappelli and other such were later built”.4 And he criticises the academics, the authors are particularly in- “ahistorical liberal-democratic impatience terested in the precedent set by Europe’s [which] may consider this too modest an own historical path to development. But, achievement.”5 whereas Cappelli might treat evidence of Europe’s past reliance on crime as a reason The aim of this study is not to justify a rel- for relativism, the authors see it as a way to ativist approach to crime – just the reverse. hone the EU’s promotion of its norms. Rath- The authors treat the EU’s present-day defi- er than leaving itself open to accusations of nition of crime as the ‘gold standard’, using double standards, Europe can potentially the term ‘crime’ as shorthand for practic- use this more nuanced understanding of its es widely deemed criminal in the EU today. past to create more credible, sympathetic Likewise, in line with current EU practice, the and effective foreign policies. authors focus on ‘serious’ and ‘organised’ crime, as this is more likely to have a signif- icant effect on development. Finally, when imagining the future of crime, we do so by reference to fields where EU crime-fighters are forging a leading role: cybercrime, slave labour, human organ trafficking, drug pro- duction and genome editing. And we draw on key EU policy documents, including the Seri- ous and Organised Crime Threat Assessment (SOCTA) produced by Europol, the EU agency for law enforcement cooperation.6
3 House of Commons International Aid Committee, “Aid under Pressure,” Evidence, Mr Maciej Popowski, Fourth Report 2008-2009, p. 60; Hayriye Avara and Bruno Mascitelli, “Do as We Say, Not as We Do’: EU to Turkey on Roma/Gypsy Integration,” European Review, vol. 22, no. 1 (2014), pp. 129-44; Peter Evans, “Develop as We Say, Not as We Did,” Interview with Ha-Joon Chang, Berkeley Review of Latin American Studies, April 7, 2008, https://clas.berkeley.edu/ research/development-develop-we-say-not-we-did. 4 Ottorino Cappelli, “Pre-Modern State-Building in Post-Soviet Russia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 24, no. 4 (2008), pp. 531-72. 5 Ibid. 6 Europol lists 44 areas of ‘serious organised crime’ of which eight are identified as priority crime threats: cybercrime; drug production, trafficking and distribution; migrant smuggling; organised property crime; trafficking in human beings; criminal finances and money laundering; document fraud; and the online trade in illicit goods and services. See: Europol, Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment, 2017. 18 CHAPTER 2 CAN CRIME CONTRIBUTE TO LIBERAL DEVELOPMENT?
The key to unlocking wicked problems is evi- dence – more precisely, generating evidence to help decision-makers reconcile seemingly The EU’s four core policy principles contradictory pressures. In the case of the EU and the many dilemmas facing its foreign poli- Precedent cy, this means digging up evidence to reconcile its long-held ideas about the effective realisa- Europe’s own model of politico-economic tion of its idealistic goals with a new emphasis development sets the path and template on its basic interests. for others, including its achievement of (virtually) crime-free governance. If the authors are correct, the EU has distilled its ideas about effective foreign policy into four Progress core principles – summed up as ‘precedent’, ‘progress’, ‘problem-solving’ and the ‘past’. As in Europe, states’ progress is meas- The implicit assumption running through all ured by their ability to modernise and four principles is that what worked best inside spread the benefits of development to Europe will also work well abroad. In the case of their citizens, requiring strong adminis- collusion, that understanding of Europe’s his- trative capacity to banish illiberal forces tory explains why the EU tries to banish crimi- like criminals. nals from the public sphere. Problem-solving
Having articulated the EU’s guiding policy Societal obstacles to progress can be principles the real work begins with an effort overcome, no matter a country’s culture to challenge them. It goes without saying that or geography, by spreading prosperity, crime is an overwhelmingly negative phe- raising living standards and creating a nomenon, a leech on the body politic. But the robust middle class. assumption that crime is uniformly negative appears to derive from a classic liberal reading The past of European history. The task now is to look for any instances where crime has in fact served Europe’s history does have a dark side liberal development. and this presents the EU with a unique responsibility to prevent a resurgence of Any such evidence would show that the EU can, colonialism and neo-imperialism – in- at least in theory, follow its interests by en- cluding by emerging powers exploiting gaging with collusive states, without compro- corrupt regimes. mising its idealistic liberal goals. Is the classic liberal interpretation of history accurate or can CHAPTER 2 | Can crime contribute to liberal development? 19 crime, in fact, advance liberal development? centralising powers (violence, money-making The search for evidence that actively contra- and rule-making) while also giving society a dicts these assumptions is detailed over the lever to control the state and tame it. course of this chapter, and permits the con- struction of a counter-case: On the surface, it would hardly seem to mount a challenge to the EU’s current policy principles: > Collusion did in fact play a positive role in the EU’s antipathy towards crime and corrup- Europe’s own historical path to liberalism; tion is based on the modern-day finding that these phenomena are profoundly negative. By > Collusion can sometimes be more condu- contrast, most of this state-building literature cive to good public administration than draws on the deep history of development in crime-fighting; Europe, Asia and the Middle East. It details how the earliest states emerged thanks to a close > More prosperous societies sometimes find cooperation with violent and predatory crimi- collusion more acceptable than their poorer nals, before gradually turning these attributes counterparts; to the common good. And yet, the EU is en- gaged in cooperation with partner states in the > The global liberal framework sometimes very early stages of modernisation (Afghani- pushes states towards crime. stan), which suffer from weak central authority (Libya), or which have missed out on vital early steps of state-building (Somalia). So this deep history is not without relevance. LESSON 1 Today, states across the developing world find Collusion helped Europe themselves under huge strain. As such, it would probably be easy to argue the case for granting on the path to liberalism an exceptional loosening of aid conditions for developing states with criminal links. But the Most of the literature about the EU’s ear- evidence goes further than making the case for ly development in the 1950s, and Europe- merely a partial exemption. In fact, it suggests a an international development policy since its systemic link between collusion and successful launch in 19751 has roots in economics and state-building – a link also apparent in Euro- political economy. This canon of literature pean history. If, as we believe, the EU’s guiding proves almost uniformly sceptical about there policy principle is the concept of ‘precedent’ – being any public benefits to crime-state -rela the idea that Europe’s own liberal path guides tions, tending to frame the subject in terms of the way for others – then Brussels is duty bound ‘rent-seeking’ and corruption. There is, how- to at least consider this evidence. The EU is the ever, a slim strand of literature on the EU and inheritor of its member states’ deep history and its international policies which is rooted in is a leading international development player. state-building.2 And that body of analysis does Moreover, this alternative history of develop- provide evidence that collusion can play a pos- ment – of state-building through crime – is itive role: collusion has on occasions helped often better at explaining liberal outcomes than states improve their governance capacity by liberal history itself.
1 One expert argues that until the Lomé Convention of 1975, the EU lacked a ‘coherent overall development policy’. See: Dieter Frisch, “The European Union’s development policy. A personal view of 50 years of Development Policy”, Policy Management Report 15. ECDPM, Maastricht, www.ecdpm.org/pmr15. 2 James Caporaso, “The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern?” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 31, no. 1 (March, 1996), pp. 29-52; Jan Zielonka, “Is the European Union a Neo-Medieval Empire?” Great Debate Paper no. 1, The Cicero Foundation, 2008, https://www.cicerofoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/Jan_Zielonka_The_EU_Neo- Medieval_Empire.pdf. 20 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states?
State-building by crime: the case of Japan
State-building in Europe began when war- Honshu was under his control and the power lords expanded and consolidated their of other daimyō severely curtailed.5 realms through violence and expropriation. Similar processes also took place elsewhere His successor, Hideyoshi, continued the - in the Ottoman Empire,1 Yorubaland,2 process of territorial consolidation by sim- Hawaii,3 and beyond. Once they established ilarly violent means. Yet once his power was power, rulers then went on to outlaw the secure, he forced disarmament throughout very same methods from others. the country, sending government troops on ‘sword hunts’ to confiscate weapons. In late sixteenth century Japan, for example, His aim was clear: to secure a monopoly the daimyō (warlord) Oda Nobunaga waged on force, or ‘coercion’, within Japan as he war against rival lords and deposed the rul- launched a (disastrous) invasion of Korea.6 ing shogun.4 By the end of his rule, most of
1 In the nascent Ottoman Empire, the devsirme system was imposed on the Christian population, allowing the state to claim (by force) male children between 8 and 12 years old for the Sultan’s private army in Istanbul. This army raised helped bolster the Sultan’s ability to assert a monopoly on violence and reduce the power of the Turkish nobility. See: Ahmad Feroz, The Making of Modern Turkey (London & New York: Routledge, 1993), pp. 18-19. 2 The pre-colonial Niger basin comprised a number of Yoruba ‘states and a state system that derived extensive support from three distinctive features – warfare, slavery and slave-taking,’ each of which helped the Yoruba elite to control the resources they needed to gain power and influence. See: E.C. Ejiogu. “State building in pre-colonial sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Yorubaland”, in Political Power and Social Theory (published online: 12 March, 2015), pp. 3-40. 3 Proto-states formed in Hawai’i as local leaders such as Ma’ilikukahi on the island of O’ahu became ‘stationary bandits’ who sought to centralise power for themselves, often while seeking to expand their rule to other islands. By the eighteenth century, the eight islands of Hawai’i counted just three rulers. And by 1810, King Kamehameha I had constructed a centralised kingdom ruling over all eight (thanks in part to his acquisition of European military technologies). See: Ian Morris, War! What Is It Good For?: Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2014), pp.149-50. 4 Ibid., pp.151-2. 5 Nobunaga used investiture of daimyo with new lands as a tool to move them away from their established power bases and prevent them from being able to raise their own private armies. See: Philip Brown, Central Authority and Local Autonomy in the Formation of Early Modern Japan (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993), pp. 6-7. 6 Op. Cit., War! What is it Good For?, p. 152.
as advances in agriculture encouraged people to settle down. But, whereas liberal history sees THE EVIDENCE this as the point where economic rationalisation and civilisation unfurl in a smooth progressive A lesser known strand of historical analysis tells fashion, revisionist historians tell a different the story of state-building and development in story. As urban settlements became widespread, Europe as a tale of criminal enterprise.3 Like the they say, people were forced to settle down, familiar liberal version of European history, this abandoning small non-hierarchical mobile alternative story begins around 3,000 years ago communities and traditional itinerant ways of
3 Janice Thomson, Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994); Willem van Schendel and Itty Abraham, Illicit Flows and Criminal Things: States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005); Peter Andreas, “Illicit Globalization: Myths, Misconceptions, and Historical Lessons,” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 126, no. 3 (2011), pp. 403-25. CHAPTER 2 | Can crime contribute to liberal development? 21 ensuring security.4 In these vulnerable, hierar- instead see a brutal logic of power-seeking and chical communities, crime emerged as a strategy raison d’état. And the means were crime and crim- for survival, resistance and finally advancement inalisation. As their landholdings became larger, – a ‘crooked social ladder’,5 or tool to rise in power struggles between feudal lords intensified. society. But as elites formed, they used these States cheered when a single winner was able to criminal techniques to control populations and claim a monopoly on violence.10 The winners territory. What had been a means of resistance centralised the means of ‘coercion’ (violence and increasingly became an instrument of power. protection), then ‘extraction’ (raising capital) and, finally, ‘transgression’ (the power to make In Europe, the first states took form in the Mid- and break rules). Each time they centralised a set dle Ages as rulers deployed just such means of of criminal powers, rulers outlawed their use by crime and terror – a protection racket.6 This oc- others as a way to lock in their advantage. If this curred when a predatory class of roving warlords revisionist narrative is to be believed, European gained respectability as great landowners. They states were large-scale protection rackets that asserted control over large areas of land by la- controlled populations through the asymmetri- belling itinerant populations as ‘bandits’ while cal use of crime, terror and mobility. 11 claiming freedom of movement for themselves.7 Pastoralists now found themselves tied to plots The pertinent lesson for EU strategists thinking of land too small to support their needs and thus about weak states like Syria and proto-states to a precarious system of joint food production. like Afghanistan is that this brutal process did Landlords exploited their vulnerability for fi- not preclude liberal outcomes. Indeed liberal- nancial gain, offering peasants a sense of secu- ism was a logical outcome of the desire to cen- rity, which often amounted to little more than an tralise power. Rulers accrued their powers by exemption from violence meted out by the lord’s criminal techniques but, importantly, they then own militia. For ordinary people, roving banditry outlawed their use by others, leading to the remained a common means of resistance. But the pacification and civilianisation of territory. In methods of the lords – or ‘stationary bandits’8 order to lessen their reliance on criminals, they – were more effective. Owning land meant that sought to broaden their range of domestic allies they were able to extort revenue through ‘tith- by spreading the benefits of their rule. Early Eu- ing’, later relabelled ‘taxation’. ropean rulers were reliant upon local warlords from whom they bought protection and secu- Liberal historians assert that European rity. But, increasingly, they aligned themselves nation-states emerged from a dynamic of na- with other classes to undercut these rivals.12 tional market-building, economic rationali- The urban gentry provided rulers with access to sation and ‘bourgeoisification’.9 Revisionists the capital they needed to fund standing armies
4 The popular historian Yuval Noah Harari argues that migration is the natural state of humanity. It is an innate survival strategy, providing physical and food security. The invention of the plough obliged societies to become sedentary, exposing them to unimaginable vulnerabilities. This meant that the course of civilisation unrolled not smoothly but rather with one panicked innovation after another. As he succinctly puts it, ‘wheat domesticated man’, rather than the other way around. Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (London: Vintage Books, 2011). 5 James M. O’Kane, The Crooked Ladder: Gangsters, Ethnicity and the American Dream (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing, 1992); Malcom Gladwell, “The Crooked Ladder,” New Yorker, August 4, 2014, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/11/ crooked-ladder. 6 Charles Tilly, “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), p. 171. 7 Tim Cresswell, On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World (New York: Routledge, 2006), p. 13. 8 Mancur Olsen, Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictators (New York: Basic Books, 2000). 9 For example, T.H. Marshall’s theory of how citizenship rights in England evolved. See: T.H. Marshall, Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950). 10 Op. Cit., “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” p. 171. 11 Ibid., p. 172. 12 Ibid., pp. 179-80. 22 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? of their own. In return, rulers promised to put their powers to work for their new clients – of- LESSON 2 fering the middle classes law and order, jobs and services, and a social contract. Collusion can be more conducive to good public administration than crime-fighting State-building by force: the case of France The EU seems to subscribe to a linear conception of progress based on a liberal reading of history. That would explain its heavy focus on building The foundations for modern centralised other states’ capacities and sharing technical ex- rule were laid in France only in the 1620s, pertise in the field of justice and home affairs.13 when Cardinal Richelieu began to claim In the classic liberal reading, strong state insti- as doctrine a royal monopoly on force. tutions established themselves via a Darwinian Following Richelieu’s advice, Louis XIII logic of growth through competitive struggle. destroyed the castles of the great rebel In Europe, that involved a centuries-long arms lords against whom his armies faced a race against criminal groups. States secured constant struggle. In a bid to disarm his their monopoly of coercion, extraction and rivals, the king also condemned duelling, transgression at the expense of rivals; the strug- the carrying of deadly weapons and the gle honed and strengthened their capacities; and raising of private armies. It took another it allowed them to outlaw their competitors. 50 years and the series of calamitous civil wars known as ‘La Fronde’ (1648-1653) This classic liberal reading of history would ex- for the crown to decisively wrest control plain one of the hidden assumptions underpinning from the nobility.1 This marked the point the EU’s understanding of progress, and one which at which local warlords finally yielded to we believe is problematic – that states with strong a prince and where domestic violence be- crime-fighting capacities are guilty of backsliding tween rival landholders gave way to in- if they forgo competition with criminals in favour ternational warfare. of collusion. There is a strand of evidence to offer a different perspective. It shows that crime-fighting is not the only means of state-building. And nor is it necessarily the best. Fighting criminals is a risky 1 Op. Cit., “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime”, pp. 173-4. strategy with no guarantees of success – and, even when it is successful, it can cost the state and soci- ety dearly. Pragmatic and limited collusion some- times works better.
Throughout history, states have advanced not by fighting crime but by tolerating or cooper- ating with criminals – even with those groups whose behaviour the state itself had proscribed. Somewhat counter-intuitively, such incidenc- es of collusion grew more frequent as states advanced because the process of gradual state
13 This criticism has been levelled against the EU’s foreign policy in general and its Neighbourhood Policy in particular. In Ukraine, for example, TAIEX has been criticised for an excessive focus on government-to-government cooperation at the expense of deeper developmental work. See: Richard Youngs (ed.), “Is the European Union Supporting Democracy in its Neighbourhood,” Fundación para las relaciones internatcionales y el diálogo interior, p. 91, https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/94972/EU_democracy. pdf. CHAPTER 2 | Can crime contribute to liberal development? 23
states, allowing them to control marginal ter- Collusive development: ritory societal groups by cooperative means the case of Thailand rather than by the costly deployment of force.
Thailand struggled for many years to rein in illicit poppy cultivation in its remote and ethnically diverse highland regions. THE EVIDENCE Unable to muster the repressive force needed to eliminate the industry, it tried The ideal of state-building through an alternative approach. In the 1980s, it crime-fighting, the one that seemingly- in began to focus on better integrating the spires European policymakers, certainly does highlands, providing greater funding for have historical precedent and can readily be education, health and infrastructure and illustrated with examples such as the devel- focusing on integrating non-Thai eth- opment of the Finnish Sea Guard. When the nic groups.1 fledgling Finnish state banned alcohol in 1919, customs officers seized thousands of litres Laws criminalising cultivation were in- from fishing boats and merchant ships in the troduced only later and, even then, a first months. But smugglers were quick to in- gradual timeline for crop eradication novate.14 They armed themselves and clashed was then negotiated with local commu- violently with law enforcement agencies. The nities. In 2002, Thailand was declared state was obliged to compete with them. As a ‘poppy-free’ by the UN Office on Drugs result, political will to tackle the problem grew and Crime.2 Its ‘alternative development’ and the state invested heavily, hiring more cus- approach won over international part- toms agents, providing better equipment and ners, and the state has begun to apply encouraging communications with other law similar measures in urban areas where enforcement agencies. By 1930, Finland had synthetic drugs are now being produced.3 a fully-fledged Sea Guard, a new agency fully dedicated to the supervision of its territori- al waters which – unlike prohibition laws – is still around today as part of the national Bor- 15 1 Op. cit., “Development Not Drug Control: der Guard. The Evolution of Counter Narcotic Efforts in Thailand”. 2 Ibid. But this ideal type of state-building is none- 3 Ibid. theless comparatively rare and does not al- ways end well. Even when the state achieves its aims of defeating criminals and asserting expansion and consolidation obliged them to state authority, it often encounters setbacks focus on borderlands and marginalised groups. and bottom-up resistance. This is illustrated by another Nordic example, albeit one from Criminal elements there could supplement the an earlier phase of state-building: in the late state’s power and enjoyed the legitimacy of lo- seventeenth century, the borderlands of Swe- cal custom. Rather than undermining the state, den and Denmark fell into the hands of bandits a willingness to collaborate with or, at the very known as Snapphanar; both states asserted their least tolerate criminal activities strengthened authority, leading to the first real demarcation
14 “History of Finnish Customs: Prohibition Act,” The Customs Museum, https://tulli.fi/en/web/tullimuseo/history-of-finnish- customs1/prohibition-act. 15 Op. Cit., “Illicit Partners and Political Development,” pp. 157-9. 24 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? of the border – but it took generations for the 16 bloodletting to be forgotten. In the past, such Criminal legitimacy: bloodshed was an acceptable cost for states, the case of the Italian Dodecanese which were largely unaccountable to their cit- izens. But, today, it saps governments’ legiti- macy.17 Crime-fighting can escalate violence, In 1924, the governor of the Italian is- engulfing society as a whole and unwitting- lands of the Aegean reported back to ly strengthening criminal groups.18 Often the Rome that the province had become rife state responds by adopting an even stricter ap- with smuggling. But, rather than detail- proach, empowering coercive institutions such ing measures taken to curb illicit trade, as the police and border guard. These meas- he wrote that his administration “does ures are counterproductive19 and may result in not encourage smuggling, but neither abuses of power.20 does it apply itself to repressing it”.1 This permissive approach was based on two These lessons of history continue to go un- basic observations. First, many island- heeded. Present-day China bears the legacy of ers’ livelihoods depended on trade with a worst-case scenario example of an aggressive nearby Greek and Turkish islands, and so crime-fighting approach. In the early -twenti the legitimacy of the Italian administra- eth century, successive Chinese governments tion would be difficult to maintain if this (both imperial and republican) presided over were banned. And, second, the cost of a campaign to suppress rural opium produc- patrolling the islands’ extensive coast- tion. These efforts met with strong resistance. line would dwarf any improvement in The rural populations regarded opium culti- customs revenues. By turning a blind eye vation as a legitimate activity, and their live- to smuggling, the Italian administration lihoods depended on it. The state responded responded to the needs of local people by engaging in a highly repressive form of and bolstered its legitimacy.2 law enforcement. The campaign was highly successful in eradicating production – but it robbed state institutions of societal acceptance in opium-producing regions. This contributed 1 As quoted by Filippo Marco Espinoza and Giorgios Papanicolaou, “Smuggling in the Dodecanese to the revolution and the fragmentation of the under the Italian Administration,” in G.A. Chinese state in 1917, a state of affairs which Antonopoulos (ed.), Illegal Entrepreneurship, Organized Crime and Social Control (Cham: spurred its most recent attempts at central- Springer, 2016), p. 189. 21 ised control. 2 Ibid.
Weak states like Afghanistan or Iraq have the most to gain from a raw assertion of crime-fighting power. But they also have the
16 Thomas Gallant, “Brigandage, Piracy, Capitalism, and State-Formation: Transnational Crime from a Historical World-Systems Perspective,” in Josiah Heyman (ed.) States and Illegal Practices (London: Hart Publishing, 1999), pp. 48-9. 17 States often attempt to legitimise such violence with euphemisms such as ‘cleansing’ (Colombia), ‘pacification’ (Brazil) or ‘encounter killings’ (India). See: Nicholas Rush Smith, Contradictions of Democracy: Vigilantism and Rights in Post-Apartheid South Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), p. 214. 18 Vanda Felbab-Brown, “A State-Building Approach to Organized Crime, Illicit Economies, Hybrid Threats and Hybrid Governance,” in Virginia Comolli (ed.) Organized Crime and Illicit Trade (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2018), p. 130. 19 In El Salvador, for example, iron fist (mano dura) policies were ‘an ineffective, even counterproductive approach to the gang problem’. See: Sonja Wolf, Mano Dura: The Politics of Gang Control in El Salvador (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2017), p. 226. 20 The systematic abuse of power by the Philippines’ police force is a recent example of this tendency. See: Human Rights Watch, “‘License to Kill’. Philippine Police Killings in Duterte’s ‘War on Drugs’,” March 2, 2017, https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/03/02/ license-kill/philippine-police-killings-dutertes-war-drugs. 21 James Windle, “Harms Caused by China’s 1906-17 Opium Suppression Intervention,” International Journal of Drug Policy, no. 24 (2013), pp. 498-505. CHAPTER 2 | Can crime contribute to liberal development? 25
Crime or revolution: the case of Britain’s American colonies
In the second half of the seventeenth centu- enforcement.”3 At first, this was because ry, the British authorities imposed trading illicit wealth drove up demand for British rules that severely restricted the American goods, providing a stimulus to trade and colonies’ ability to trade with other Euro- consolidating the power of the British state. pean states in a bid to consolidate their hold But as time wore on, tolerance of smuggling over the territory. In the northern colonies, became an unofficial means for the Crown to this posed an acute threat to local stability signal to the colonial elite that it was sen- and security as these areas produced very sitive to their needs, even if official trade little that was in demand in Britain.1 As a regulations were not. When mounting debt result, port cities like New York, Philadel- prompted Britain to crack down on colonial phia and Boston turned to smuggling as a smuggling in the 1760s, it became clear to means of offsetting the shock. Smuggling colonial society that their needs were sec- was deemed legitimate not just by the poor ondary to those of the Crown. This prompt- in these areas, but also by the existing mer- ed a surge in revolutionary activity in the chant elites.2 northern colonies. The merchant elite began to smuggle arms and ammunition across Initially, colonial smuggling “was met borders, precipitating the American War of with imperial accommodation more than Independence.4
1 Peter Andreas, Smuggler Nation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 13-22. 2 One prominent family of merchant-smugglers were the Hancocks of Boston. John Hancock was one of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence. See: Ibid., pp. 13-22. 3 Ibid., p. 15. 4 Andreas contests that “[i]t was not so much Britain’s burdensome trade and tax rules that provoked such outrage in the colonies but rather the attempt for the first time to actually enforce the rules—and thus threaten long-established smuggling activities.” Ibid., p. 30.
most to lose. If they fail to beat violent crimi- advanced. This is because the process of state nals in a straight fight, they haemorrhage au- expansion and consolidation obliged them to thority. This is why, rather than establishing focus on their margins: on borderlands and power by imposing the rule of law, many states marginalised groups. Criminal elements there instead cohere by offering precisely the oppo- could supplement the state’s access to capital site: qualified exemptions from it. Throughout and enjoyed the legitimacy of local custom. European history, there have been examples of rulers who advanced state-building through cooperation with criminals – even those whose behaviour they had themselves proscribed. Somewhat counter-intuitively, such incidenc- es of collusion grew more frequent as states 26 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states?
behaviour like intellectual property theft?22 And LESSON 3 why has Russia neither embraced liberal de- mocracy nor severed its ties to criminal groups Prosperous societies despite levels of wealth on a par with some EU member states?23 Revisionist history is bet- sometimes find collusion more ter able to answer these questions. As we have acceptable than poorer ones. already seen, this alternative understanding of development argues that progress is better benchmarked by the aggressive centralisation As we have seen, the classic liberal reading of of power by the state than by economic indi- history portrays global progress as a linear pro- cators, and that collusion with criminals offers cess, with economies growing more efficient states a means to achieve this. But, vitally, it via a Darwinian process of competition. We also suggests that collusion is what gives vent have corrected this by placing state-building to bottom-up pressures for political inclusion. centre-stage, and highlighting that states de- velop in a non-linear, cyclical fashion. But there is a second, equally important element to the liberal model. Liberals imagine a close link between economic competition and democra- tisation. They argue that economic liberalisa- THE EVIDENCE tion drives political liberalisation. As domestic The classic liberal model of development holds economies modernise, the logic goes, urban that states become more responsive to their middle classes demand modern democratic populations as their middle classes expand and governance and provide governments with the demand a say in government. Yet revisionist support to expel criminals from the body poli- historians have highlighted a dynamic of po- tic. The EU’s development goals likewise focus litical liberalisation and tolerance driven by a on the democratisation of society, and it logi- quite different process – not economic- mod cally tries to achieve this by addressing what it ernisation, but raison d’état. This involved the identifies as the economic root causes of obsta- incorporation of marginal and often criminal cles to socio-political modernisation. groups into the apparatus of the state. This pro- cess was driven by necessity. Marginal groups Yet this classical liberal view is increasingly such as the Cossacks of the Russian Steppes24 or under fire due to its inability to explain a sim- the Uskoks of the Habsburg Adriatic,25 had be- ple fact: global wealth has spread in the last come highly adept at using crime as a means of 30 years, but democracy has stuttered. Why, survival on the margins of a state that neglect- for instance, do China’s fast-growing middle ed them. Rather than eliminating such groups, classes appear largely content with an author- rulers instead co-opted them into their ser- itarian leadership that itself engages in deviant vice. In return, the state granted these criminal
22 Andrew Nathan, “The Puzzle of the Chinese Middle Class,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 27, no. 2 (2016), pp. 5-19. 23 According to World Bank figures, Russia’s gross national income (GNI) per capita stood at $26,470 in 2018. Two EU member states fell into a range of less than 5% above this figure, while one stood below. See: International Comparison Program, “GNI per capita, PPP,” World Bank, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.PP.CD. 24 Early Cossack communities were made up of criminals, runaways and misfits who fled to the borders of Muscovy to escape feudal obligations, taxation, famine, debt and justice. During the fourteenth century, the emerging Muscovite state co-opted Cossacks on its south-eastern borders to work as border guards, to defend against Tatar raids and to guide emissaries and merchants safely across the Steppe. In return, Cossacks’ reliance on piracy and theft was tolerated by the state. See: See: Kelly Hignett, “Co-option or criminalisation? The state, border communities and crime in early modern Europe,” Global Crime, vol. 9, nos. 1-2, February- May 2008, pp. 37-40 25 The Uskoks were a band of Christian refugees from Ottoman lands that settled in Senj on the Dalmatian coast. Here, they survived through plunder, piracy and racketeering against Muslims and Christians alike (although they denied the latter). Throughout the sixteenth century, Habsburg authorities tolerated the Uskoks’ criminal activities. In response to Venetian complaints about Uskok piracy, the Habsburg state claimed that the Uskoks were necessary to defend against the Ottoman threat and that the state could not afford to replace them with regular troops. Only with the decline of Ottoman power in the early seventeenth century did the Habsburgs begin to crack down on Uskok activities. See: Ibid., pp. 40-45 CHAPTER 2 | Can crime contribute to liberal development? 27 bands ‘privileges’, often amounting to an ex- and then crushed these criminals. But, once emption from the strict application of the law. again, a subtler logic was at play: the state found that it was more cost-effective to spread The implacable logic of raison d’état was even the proceeds of crime. more obvious in Western Europe. There, rul- ers colluded with violent criminals, driven by There are more reasons to question the liber- a desire to appropriate the criminals’ coercive al assumption that societies lose their taste capabilities. Outside the ruler’s employ, their for crime as they grow wealthier.29 Through- associates were violent outlaws – but their out history, it is precisely the middle-class ability to wield force made them a valuable as- members of marginal groups and the provin- set.26 Thanks to rulers’ thirst for power, roving cial bourgeoisie who have bankrolled criminal bandits became police, highwaymen tax collec- groups. The Sicilian mafia is a prime -exam tors and pirates privateers. Collusion served not ple. Its sponsors were not motivated by a de- only to strengthen public administration but sire for wealth – or at least not only. Rather, also to make it more open and inclusive. This is they sought more inclusive government, and because rulers picked their dubious associates from the geographical and societal margins of the state, and they were subsequently unable to quash them without widespread social re- Taming bandits: sistance. Instead they simply co-opted violent the case of Ottoman Anatolia criminals into the system, oftentimes yielding to local customs.27 Between 1550 and 1660, banditry became endemic in Ottoman Anatolia. Bands of The same holds true for rulers’ relations with demobilised soldiers, vagrants and desti- non-violent criminals. European states turned tute peasants known as ‘celali’ plundered to these groups when they needed to boost their and extorted towns and villages across ‘extractive’ capabilities and raise money. One Anatolia.1 Rather than relying on force, typical example is in times of war, when they the state negotiated with bandits.2 Their found themselves cut off from international leaders were awarded high-ranking po- trade and financial flows. The French state, for sitions in the provincial administration, example, licensed smugglers to break its own while their followers were given work naval blockade in the English Channel to deliv- collecting taxes or were incorporated into er gold, goods and information from England. the army. If they continued to predate on As well as helping the state build capital, these the local population – and in particular if operations represented a means of reaching out they refused the call to battle – the state to the fringes of French territory and society, cracked down on them.3 Thus, bandit- bringing jobs and welfare to struggling port ry and co-optation became a channel of towns.28 Naturally, if it had been able to pursue mobility not only for would-be provincial its blunt logic of centralisation, the state would administrators but also “for the destitute have appropriated the smugglers’ capabilities and the vagrant, providing them with employment opportunities other than agriculture and thereby relieving rural tensions.”4 26 Op. Cit., “Brigandage, Piracy, Capitalism, and State- Formation”. 27 Ibid. 28 Gavin Daly, “Napoleon and the ‘City of Smugglers’, 1810- 1814,” Historical Journal, vol. 50, no. 2 (June 2007), pp. 1 Karen Barkey, Bandits and Bureaucrats: The 333-52. Ottoman Route to State Centralization (Ithaca & 29 This essentially economic understanding of crime ‘risk[s] London: Cornell University Press, 1994), stripping away the influence of social and cultural forces… pp. 195-7. including social and cultural identities that help explain 2 Ibid., pp. 203-228. organized crime and its variety’. See: John Picarelli, ‘Enabling Norms and Human Trafficking’ in H. R. Friman 3 Ibid., pp. 200-201. (ed.), Crime and the Global Political Economy (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2009), pp. 85-103. 4 Ibid., p. 236. 28 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states?
violent criminals were the only actors capable of Community smuggling: squeezing this from an unresponsive state. The the case of present-day Algeria original mafiosi acted as a mediating force be- tween local society and a distant ruler.30 There are also examples – past and present – of mar- On Algeria’s border with Tunisia, smug- ginal groups that relied heavily on non-violent gling has emerged as a major part of the criminals to provide jobs and welfare.31 Again, local economy. Petrol, which is gener- they supported collusion not because of the ously subsidised in oil-producing Alge- trickle-down economics of crime but as a way ria, is transported across the border to of achieving a form of governance more sym- Tunisia, where it fetches three times the pathetic to their way of life. price. The motive for smuggling is noth- ing less than societal survival.1 The re- gion has long been neglected by central According to this revisionist version of histo- government and is poor and underdevel- ry, crime can potentially be progressive. Under oped. Jobs are few and far between, and very specific circumstances, it can make the even those people who do work struggle central government not only stronger but also to make ends meet. more responsive and inclusive. This is because governments collude with criminals in order to Smugglers do not find it difficult to -jus strengthen their hand – to reinforce their mo- tify their acts; they see themselves as en- nopoly on violence or to help them gain access trepreneurs, not criminals. The border is to capital. But this gives social groups – even treated as an artificial barrier imposed by middle-class ones – an opportunity to steer the colonial powers and sustained by a dis- government, using crime to make themselves tant central state “intent on restricting valuable to the ruling elite. This can potential- everything from their mobility to their ly make government more open and inclusive, livelihood”.2 Yet local authorities are and allows societies to push it to respond to more accommodating. They know that their needs. Once this has been achieved, both a crackdown on smuggling would wreak sides work to expel criminals from the body economic havoc. And they fear it would politic or to tame them by co-opting them into also be an easy recruiting tool for jiha- it. Liberal democracy is by no means the only di groups. Instead, they have sought to logical outcome of collusive state-building, but co-opt smugglers. As long as smugglers it is certainly one possible product. keep clear of jihadis, weapons and illicit drugs, they will be allowed to continue their activities unchecked.3
1 Dalia Ghanem, “Algeria’s Borderlands: A Country unto Themselves,” Carnegie Middle East Centre, May 27, 2020, https://carnegie-mec. org/2020/05/27/algeria-s-borderlands-country- unto-themselves-pub-81881, p.8. 30 James Cockayne, “Can Organised Crime Shape Post- 2 Ibid. war Transitions? Evidence from Sicily,” Third World 3 Ghanem proposes two possible strategies for Thematics, vol. 3, no. 1 (2018), pp. 9-27; Letizia Paoli, Mafia Algiers to deal with smuggling, by transforming Brotherhoods: Organized Crime, Italian Style (New York: smugglers into either entrepreneurs or agenct od Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 36. the state? Notably, she does not consider a ‘tough- 31 Largely unassimilated immigrant communities – Jews in on-crime’ approach as a viable option. See: Ibid., the United States (particularly in the 1920s and 1990s), p. 13. Albanians in Europe or Koreans in Japan - provide clear examples of marginal groups that have turned to crime as a source of jobs and welfare. One writer contends that states deliberately encourage the creation of mafias among these communities as a ‘time-limited’ channel for extracting revenue from their illicit activities. See: Herman Schwartz, ’Immigrants and Organized Crime,’ in H. R. Friman (ed.), Crime and the Global Political Economy, op. cit., pp. 119-129. CHAPTER 2 | Can crime contribute to liberal development? 29
LESSON 4 Illicit development: the case of Turkey The global liberal framework sometimes pushes In the mid-1920s, when restrictions on states towards crime the opium trade were agreed on by the International Opium Convention in Ge- neva, Turkey was one of the world’s big- These historical examples of state-building gest opium producers. Due to Turkey’s by collusion may appear obscure at first sight. limited industrial capacity, it was re- Under the post-war liberal multilateral sys- fused licences to produce morphine and tem, almost all countries are assumed to have codeine, effectively locking it out of the achieved modern statehood. They enjoy ter- most lucrative part of the trade.1 Licences ritorial sovereignty and official recognition, were instead awarded primarily to West- meaning they do not need to consolidate terri- ern states, while others like Turkey were tory through the violent processes that charac- expected to content themselves with terised Europe’s own development. Indeed, all supplying raw opium. that stands between these states and modern liberal statehood is economic development, In response, the Turkish government al- which Europe works to encourage through the lowed the illicit opium trade to continue twin levers of trade and aid. There seems little on the understanding the profits would if any justification for the EU to dabble once be reinvested in improving the coun- more in the murky practices of state-building try’s industrial capacity. Meanwhile, the of the early modern era, an age utterly removed Turkish state lobbied for greater licens- from our own. ing rights.2 It was only in 1932, when it became clear that massive quantities of Yet this misses the point. Post-colonial states raw opium were leaving the country with may enjoy the trappings of modern statehood, no export tax being paid, that the state but they were deprived of the careful early steps began to crack down. Even then, the state of state-building, leaving their consolidation did not entirely enforce the rules. Opium incomplete. Their borders and administrative producers from the country’s least devel- models were defined by colonial powers rath- oped regions were allowed to self-report er than through local processes of contesta- their harvests with the state doing noth- tion and consolidation described above; and ing to ensure their accuracy.3 they are now beset by unresolved societal and ethnic tensions.32 For marginal groups, the state appears to be little more than a protec- tion racket to which they must pay bribes. The 1 Op. Cit., “Illicit Partners and Political effect is often to drive minorities into the arms Development: How Organized Crime Made the of criminals and militias, which appear more in State.” tune with their values.33 Yet states face pres- 2 Ibid. sure from the international community to crack 3 Ibid. down on groups which live off crime.
32 Ethnic diversity has been shown to contribute stability in ‘fragmented’ societies, in which no ethnic group maintains dominance. However, in societies characterised by dominance, the risk of civil war is doubled. See: Paul Collier, “Implications of Ethnic Diversity,” Economic Policy, vol. 16, no. 34 (April 2001), p. 134. 33 One expert provides evidence from West Africa that, in marginal areas, criminal groups may be considered more legitimate than the state. See: William Reno, “Understanding Criminality in West African Conflicts,”International Peacekeeping, vol. 16, no.1 (2009), pp. 47-61. 30 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states?
Yet the reality is that many developing states power to exert violence (‘coercion’). During today crave recognition. They may enjoy formal earlier ages of state-building, rulers achieved membership of international institutions - the this through internal conflict and civil war. United Nations and other associated bodies - but They civilianised their security apparatus only they struggle to make (or break) international once they were properly centralised and had norms.34 Membership of liberal bodies like the turned their focus to fighting external wars.35 WTO means submitting to pre-defined rules By contrast, today’s post-colonial states face made by long-standing clubs of states that they pressure to demilitarise their domestic secu- are unable to influence. Should they overstep rity apparatus. Nobody36 would suggest that the bounds, they face political and econom- state-led violence and civil war should be al- ic censure. This unsympathetic internation- lowed to proceed in the name of state-building. al order imagines raison d’état as the preserve But as things stand, states often turn to crimi- of an earlier, more anarchic era of inter-state nals to shed blood covertly on their behalf.37 competition and so traps post-colonial states in a vicious cycle. They are constrained from When it comes to the centralisation of capital practising collusive state-building - even those (‘extraction’), the pattern is repeated. Euro- ‘progressive’ forms that may help improve pean states succeeded in centralising capital in their governance capacity or the inclusion of part by harnessing the power of criminals. To- marginal groups. And so some states turn to day’s emerging states, by contrast, are forced predatory criminals to escape the constraints of the international liberal order.
Misconceived international reforms: the case of Nicaragua
THE EVIDENCE In 1997, peace was restored in Nicara- gua after years of violent confrontation Today’s liberal international order constrains between the government and the rebel all three elements we suggest constitute mod- Contras. A freshly elected government ern statehood - the centralisation of the power applied economic reforms designed by of coercion, of extraction and of transgression. the International Monetary Fund, World Take the foundation of any modern state - the Bank and US Agency for International Development.
But as economic growth took off, unem- 34 Andreas and Nadelmann describe how the diffusion ployment doubled, increasing inequality of international criminal norms is a “process driven primarily by the criminalizations of dominant states – the initial driver of the conflict.1 Rath- (notably those of Europe and the United States) and their efforts to export their own criminal justice preferences”. er than drawing ordinary people away See: Peter Andreas and Ethan Nadelmann, “The from illicit activities, it fuelled informal Internationalization of Crime Control” in H. R. Friman (ed.), Crime and the Global Political Economy, op. cit., p. 29. and illicit economies. Armed bands in 35 For example, the French state’s drive to break the power of the countryside kidnapped as many as its aristocratic rivals in the seventeenth century coincided with an extended period of external conflict with Spain. 600 people. In cities, among underem- See: “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime”, ployed youths, there was a rapid increase op. cit. in criminal violence and gang culture.2 36 The political scientist Jeffrey Herbst comes the closest to this conclusion, arguing that there is little evidence Orthodox economic recovery brought a to suggest that ‘third world’ states will be able to achieve consolidation through purely peaceful means. return of violence. Nonetheless, he does not advocate war as a viable solution. See: Jeffrey Herbst, “War and the State in Africa,” International Security, vol. 14, no. 4 (1990), pp. 117-39. 37 This is a tactic frequently employed by Russia. See: Mark Galeotti, “Gangster Geopolitics: The Kremlin’s Use of Criminals as Assets Abroad,” Moscow Times, January 18, 1 Op. Cit., “Saving Liberal Peacebuilding”, pp. 39- 2019, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/01/18/ 68. gangster-geopolitics-the-kremlinsuse-of-criminals-as- 2 Ibid. assets-abroad-a64204. CHAPTER 2 | Can crime contribute to liberal development? 31 into a subordinate relationship with them. they lack the means with which to convert this Historically, states accrued capital through do- into genuine de facto statehood. Informal ‘sur- mestic taxation, but today they must harness vival networks’ are activated at both state and fast-flowing transnational capital flows from societal levels, and criminals – more agile and predatory investors.38 This is difficult, and it subject to fewer constraints than the state – step comes at a price. Multinational corporations into the breach.40 Bandits, thieves and conmen and financial institutions act as the gatekeepers offer their services to help states harness alter- of international money markets and have polit- native (deniable) means of coercion, extraction ical demands of their own. They promote poli- and transgression. And, increasingly, states cies of deregulation, privatisation and austerity accept. The go-to response of the international that run counter to state-building. As the state community is to impose political and economic shrinks under the weight of economic liberali- sanctions. The result: embargo-busting crimi- sation, state-building goes into reverse. States nals offer their services, only to siphon off pub- and societies may come to rely on smugglers lic finances for their own gain.41 Thus, collusion and criminal gangs to survive.39 gives way to corruption and state decay.
Finally, the power of the state to make and break rules (‘transgression’). Too easily, post-colonial states – even those of Latin America with a long history of independence – are deemed to have transgressed the bound- aries of acceptable behaviour. Western govern- ments, in order to bring them back onto the path of liberalism, turn to diplomatic isolation, trade sanctions and restrictions on migration (ordinarily an important safety valve for deal- ing with underemployed young men). These efforts to discipline governments are carried out in the expectation that they will enjoy the support of the target state’s middle classes, in line with liberal theory. But, in fact, the mid- dle classes are precisely the ones most likely to turn to criminals to stave off the effects. And, as their governments try to soften the effects of economic sanctions on voters, they too rely on criminal gangs – for instance in order to smug- gle young workers abroad and gain access to remittances.
This is where post-colonial states find them- selves trapped in a vicious circle. They enjoy the trappings of statehood – international recog- nition and de jure territorial sovereignty – but
38 Anna Leander, “Wars and the Un-Making of States: Taking Tilly Seriously in the Contemporary World,” in Stefano Guzzini and Dietrich Jung (eds.), Conceptual Innovations and Contemporary Security Analysis (London; New York: Spon Press, 2004), pp. 69-80. 39 Ibid. 40 Ibid. 41 This has famously been the case of North Korea, where the state has resorted to producing drugs, trafficking humans and trading in protected animals, not to mention consorting with terrorist groups – all in order to circumvent sanctions and gain access to cash. See: Paul Rexton Kan, Bruce Bechtol and Robert Collins, “Criminal Sovereignty: Understanding North Korea’s Illicit International Activities,” Letort Paper, US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle, PA, March 2010. 32 CHAPTER 3 CAN THE EU ENGAGE WITH COLLUSIVE STATES?
The evidence review of the previous chapter states may likewise resort to crime in order suggests that Western policymakers are wrong to centralise power and achieve inclusive to treat crime-state collusion as a uniform- political institutions. ly negative phenomenon: reliance on crime is not always a sign of partners rejecting the path > Support states that collude with crim- of liberal development, and it may sometimes inals despite having the capacity to even be a requisite for its success. That at least is fight crime. Collusion can help even- ad the theoretical conclusion drawn from the evi- vanced and robustly policed states dence review. The next step is to translate this boost their administrative capacity, for ex- finding into practical policy recommendations. ample by giving access to international fi- nance, strenghtening their international The EU cleaves to certain ideas about how leverage and improving their legitimacy best to practically achieve its internation- within society. al goals, which we have articulated as four policy principles (‘precedent’, ‘progress’, > Recognise that crime and collusion may ‘problem-solving’ and the ‘past’). At present, be perceived as legitimate even in wealthy those core principles demand the eradication states. Crime arises among socially and of collusion on the part of its partners at the geographically marginal groups because earliest possible stage. But if collusion can po- of a lack of inclusive government rath- tentially be conducive to the achievement of the er than for reasons of poverty, meaning EU’s liberal goals, a recalibration is required. groups will court criminal links even as they grow wealthy. In order for the EU to harness the ‘progressive potential’ of collusion, and offer a viable alter- > Reintroduce a valid sense of raison d’état into native to crime, it would need to rethink each the multilateral order. Weak states – and in one of these principles – the precedent set by particular weak post-colonial states - suffer Europeans in their own path to development, under a liberal international system which its way of measuring global progress, its econo- is unsympathetic to the role that crime his- metric approach to removing societal obstacles torically played in state-building, inhibiting to progress, and of course the historical obliga- modern-day catch-up. tions arising from Europe’s history of war and imperialism. Its new understanding of prece- Policymakers are often reluctant to reassess dent, progress and so on would require it to: their principles in any such drastic way – hence why policy problems become ‘wicked’. The ex- > Recognise that collusion is a systemic part of ercise of rethinking policy principles becomes global development. Crime was vital to the far more palatable if broken down into steps. In development of states – in Europe and else- this chapter, we ask: where, and today’s weak and post-colonial CHAPTER 3 | Can the EU engage with collusive states? 33
> Should the EU make the historical prec- preclude liberal outcomes. Indeed, it has some- edent of state-building in Europe avail- times even been a condition for them. able to today’s weak, developing and post-conflict states? If that is so, the EU becomes almost obliged to cooperate with collusive governments in the > Is there a way for the EU to distinguish the throes of state-building. This is because the few instances of collusion that will help four policy principles we ascribe to the EU, and states progress towards liberalism from its which have driven its success as an interna- usual negative forms? tional actor, all flow from the central notion of precedent – the notion that what worked in > Can the EU find a new problem-solving ap- Europe should be applied abroad. If the EU is to proach to overcome the societal and cultural meld its old principles to the new evidence, it roots of crime, without giving up on its usual would therefore be obliged to revisit all its oth- wealth creation approach? er core principles - progress, problem-solving and past responsibility. > Can the EU loosen multilateral constraints without giving licence to predatory powers as was the case in Europe’s own colonialist past? The EU currently treats crime-state collusion as an obstacle to its efforts to THE ANSWER spread wealth and wellbeing abroad. This is due to the obvious empirical fact that Yes, it should. crime is an overwhelmingly negative so- cietal phenomenon – but also due to the We have shown that the EU works on the prin- classical liberal reading of collusion in Eu- ciple that its own politico-economic develop- rope’s historical development. In that read- ment sets a precedent for others – that what ing, liberalism emerged from a battle to worked best in Europe will also work best expunge state-crime collusion and expel abroad. Somewhat contrary to expectations, rent-seekers and predatory criminals from our evidence review confirmed the validity of the European economy. this principle - but with a twist. It is the long history of state-building in Europe, not Eu- rope’s post-war economic modernisation, that sets the precedent. Europeans forged the template of the centralised Westphalian state QUESTION 1 that others seek to follow. And governments in Europe, at specific times in their development, Should the EU make achieved this template by deploying criminal the precedent of state- techniques. Collusion not only helped them consolidate power, but also set them on a path building by crime available to liberalism: once they had usurped the crim- to today’s states? inals’ capabilities, they outlawed their use by others and made the benefits freely available to all citizens. If the EU wants today’s weak and If we recognise global liberal development as a post-colonial states to follow Europe’s path, it product not of economic modernisation (as the should logically expect them to resort to collu- classical liberal reading seems to) but instead sion unless provided with a viable alternative. as a product of state-building and raison d’état (as our own analysis suggests), this casts a new By the same logic, the historical evidence light on the phenomenon: states everywhere suggests that the idea of progress is in were built by means of crime and collusion, and need of a re-think. The EU seems to oper- European history is evidence that this does not ate on the principle that liberal development 34 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? involves a progressive linear process towards colonialism still disrupts development across collusion-free government, and that renewed Africa, Asia and elsewhere, and governments bouts of collusion should be stamped out as dis- do believe the EU should act to redress this. But appointing examples of ‘backsliding’ and pred- again there is a twist: the criticism the EU fac- atory governance. Again, the evidence suggests es is focused not so much on the crimes of the that this principle holds fundamentally true: past as on the EU’s attempts to atone. Former the most capable public administrations are colonies resent the constraints of the interna- indeed those that have progressively severed tional system and what they see as an attitude their ties to criminals, and the states ranked of ‘do as we say, not as we did.’ Post-colonial highest for governance capacity are indeed the states seek to exercise precisely the kind of least corrupt. And yet the evidence also showed raison d’état the multilateral system is de- that states which have reached this pinnacle did signed to hinder, viewing this as vital to their not do so by a simple linear progression. Rather, ‘catch-up’ and to protecting themselves from they went through three cycles, each involving neo-colonialism. Europe thus bears a respon- a new bout of collusion. States used criminals sibility to accommodate collusive states in the to assert first their monopoly of violence, then liberal international order lest it continue to money-making, then norm-making, each time perpetuate a colonial legacy. colluding with criminals and then stamping out crime. Each new bout was evidence of progress, not of backsliding. If states skip a step, moreo- ver, they are likely to ‘regress’ later to restore these foundations. QUESTION 2 As to its ability to remove the societal obstacles Is there a way for to liberal development in weak and developing states, the EU appears to work on the assump- the EU to distinguish tion that societies all have the same basic as- potentially progressive pirations. This allows it to address obstacles to liberal developmentalism anywhere, regard- instances of collusion? less of geography or culture. This belief in the existence of universal aspiration was broadly Rethought in this way, the EU’s four core prin- confirmed by the evidence. But once again, with ciples do not prevent it from engaging with col- a twist. The EU’s current assumption is that lusive states; and they may even compel it to societies share a universal desire for econom- do so. But any duty of engagement is of course ic advancement, while the evidence suggests highly conditional and contingent on the con- that it is more to do with a common desire for text. The EU should not engage with any and inclusive and responsive government. Socie- all forms of collusion. This leads to a second ties resort to crime not for its ‘trickle-down important consideration: can the EU work out economics’ but because it addresses their lack which forms of collusion to fight, and which to of responsive and inclusive administration. treat with sympathy? More precisely, can the EU Consequently, crime may be legitimate even in learn to recognise what might be termed ‘pro- societies with a high per capita gross national gressive’ forms of collusion, and distinguish income (GNI) and among groups that are pros- them from the far more common instances of perous but marginalised. Forms of violent col- violent predation and corruption? lusion that the EU deems beyond remedy, and which it meets with economic sanctions, may After all, for an exercise like this one to be therefore be nothing of the sort. worthwhile, it will need to generate a set of principles regulating the EU’s approach to Finally, the EU’s approach to development state-crime relations - one that is coherent and suggests it feels a particular responsibility for systematic and remains true to the EU’s ulti- the colonial past of its founding members. The mate goals. The process of rethinking Europe’s evidence largely confirmed that the legacy of historical precedent cannot be allowed to throw CHAPTER 3 | Can the EU engage with collusive states? 35 policymakers into the morass of moral and This begs the question: how can the EU ver- historical relativism and debilitate the EU. Evi- ify that instances of collusion really have a dence reviews, like the one we prescribe, cannot progressive function? After all, there is often be permitted to open the door for partner states a fine line between state-building and elite to justify dubious practices simply by claim- rent-seeking. The answer lies in identifying the ing to be following the historical precedent of distinct phases of the state-building process. state-building in Europe. According to this new reading of the historical record, the would-be state initially colludes Happily, the historical review does provide a with criminals to harness their violent capa- constructive answer of sorts. It provides the bilities; next, it harnesses criminal methods basis for rethinking Europe’s path to liberal- to make money; and finally it uses criminals ism, showing that states progress not in the to bend norms. This is because the state’s first kind of linear step-by-step process that policy- priority is to centralise the means of ‘coercion’, makers commonly assume but rather in cycles. then ‘extraction’ and finally ‘transgression’: States accrue the capacity for good governance governments want to secure territory, exploit in three cycles, and crime and collusion may it and then gain domestic and international ac- play a role in each: states co-opt criminals to ceptance. The state can progress through each usurp their capabilities and then crack down stage only if it cracks down on its criminal al- on them, making the benefits of collusion more lies - and the EU ought to sanction states that freely available. If Western policymakers wish fail to do so. to identify instances of ‘progressive’ collusion, the task is to identify whether the state finds it- If the EU is to engage with collusive states it self in one of these three cycles. must not only identify examples of ‘progres- sive collusion’ but also offer an alternative. This is vital to its notion of problem-solving. Can it do so? The EU is well-versed in helping states strengthen their governance capacity, THE ANSWER the prime motivation for collaborating with criminals. But, for societies, the motivation for Yes, there is collusion is different: they view crime as legit- imate if it forces their government to be more inclusive and responsive. Thus, when the state When deciding whether to engage with collu- builds its ‘coercive capabilities’, societies press sive states, this new and more honest reading for the inclusive provision of justice and securi- of history offers the EU a basic rule of thumb. ty; when states build their ‘extractive capabili- Rather than condemning collusion outright, ties’, societies push for better jobs and services; policymakers can instead ask whether or not a and, when states build their ‘transgressive ca- development partner is following the histor- pabilities’, societies demand a sense of empow- ical precedent of state-building. If states are erment and representational government. indeed following that well-trodden path and using crime for the purposes of state-building, The EU’s recognition of a responsibility to the EU would cautiously engage (albeit look- post-colonial states completes the puzzle and ing for alternatives to draw the state away provides a means of rethinking the precedent from crime). If not, it would opt for diplomatic set by its members’ own path to development. censure. At present, the EU is more comforta- Few post-colonial states were permitted to ble with the latter course of action: diplomatic undergo the ideal sequence of state-building. censure and economic sanctions usually enjoy Newly-independent states across Africa and a clear moral case. But, with practice, the for- Asia instead inherited a set of highly coer- mer could well become the EU’s new comfort cive security services and excessively extrac- zone. Although morally complex, such cases tive economies as well as the capacity to make are likely to be more conducive to successful and break rules with impunity. Even today, state-building outcomes. they may look like fully capable states with all 36 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states?
A state-building framework
Drawing on an alternative reading of his- In a second cycle, the state looks establish a tory, state-building can be conceptualised monopoly on extraction within its territory. as a three-stage process, each one poten- Again, it may do so by entering into collu- tially involving collusion for want of oth- sive relationships with criminals able to er options: provide access to capital. Once the state has established the capacity to extract sufficient In the first cycle, the state must establish a funds by itself, it will once again sever its monopoly of violence over its territory. In criminal ties. the absence of other options, it may well do so by entering into collusive relationships In the final cycle, the state seeks to gain with violent criminal groups. But once its international acceptance for its particular goals have been achieved, the state cracks model of governance. In order to achieve down on its erstwhile allies to protect its this, it may ally itself with criminals able monopoly. to transgress established rules. Once it has successfully established its own model with their help, it will once again crack down on its criminal partners. State-building through crime State-building through crime Governance improves via three cycles of collusion and crime-fighting Governance improves via three cycles of collusion and crime-fighting
COERCION EXTRACTION TRANSGRESSION
Coll sio ith Coll sio ith Coll sio ith iole t Crime-fighting apital e erati Crime-fighting r le rea i Crime-fighting ri i als ri i als ri i als
the trappings of international recognition and territorial sovereignty. But they have not pro- gressed through the three cycles of centralisa- QUESTION 3 tion and collusion and, as such, have not built truly robust institutions or social acceptance. Can the EU find a way to overcome the societal and The EU’s instinct is often to punish states with seemingly strong capacities for ‘backsliding’. cultural roots of crime? But the benefit of this alternative approach is that it allows the EU something far more rigor- If the EU were to measure the effectiveness ous: self-restraint. of its external action less by global econom- ic improvement and more by these three state-building benchmarks, it would need to re-think its familiar ‘concentric circles’ mod- el. Focused on global economic integration and convergence, this model groups states together CHAPTER 3 | Can the EU engage with collusive states? 37 based on their proximity to the internal market and income level, as well as whether or not they THE ANSWER were once colonised by Europeans. In its place, the EU would need to tailor its approach to each Yes, it can individual society and how well the state fulfils their demands. Instead of dividing the world up into concen- tric circles and placing itself at the centre, the With this new individualised approach, the EU could instead classify each state individually EU would still attempt to pilot states towards according to its progress in state-building. The European-style liberalism. But it would also IDPS model is useful as it offers a less Eurocen- afford each society the scope to define its own tric perspective, having been formulated by a outcome within the broad parameters of ef- ‘unique multi-stakeholder partnership’ that fective, responsive and inclusive governance. gives a voice to fragile states.3 The IDPS per- Just such non-Eurocentric classifications of ceives that successful states develop five core state-building progress already exist. The In- governance capabilities: justice, security, jobs, ternational Dialogue on Peacekeeping and services, and legitimacy.4 An accompanying di- Statebuilding (IDPS) provides one such, which agnostic tool known as the Fragility Spectrum could help guide the EU’s efforts to solve- so has also been designed to help states under- cietal, geographical and cultural obstacles to stand their progress towards these goals.5 This progress.1 tool could be usefully adapted for the EU’s pur- poses. If the EU were to use similar criteria to IDPS has identified five core governance capa- classify all developing states, it would be more bilities developed by states which successfully sensitive to their needs and better able to rec- meet the demands of their citizens – justice, ognise instances of ‘progressive’ collusion. security, jobs, services, and legitimacy.2 It has also designed a diagnostic tool for assessing There is a sense of progression in the five goals how far each state has progressed. A toolbox of the IDPS.6 Justice and security are the very like IDPS could form the basis for a new EU ef- basic functions a state needs to fulfil to avoid fort. By better understanding societal demands, collapse (‘core’ or ‘survival’ functions).7 As the EU would be able to design policies that are such, they coincide with the first cycle of state more responsive to the drivers of collusion than centralisation, namely the centralisation of simply wealth creation through ‘trade and aid’. coercive force. The second category, which in- cludes the provision of economic foundations,
1 A core element of the IDPS is the participation of the g7+ group of fragile and conflict-affected states, which helps it escape the Eurocentrism of many other such forums. See: International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding, “A New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States,” Busan, South Korea, November 30, 2011. 2 The IDPS describes jobs and services more precisely as ‘economic foundations’ and ‘revenue and services’, respectively. It also defines legitimacy primarily in terms of internal, rather than international, politics. See: Tobias Nussbaum, Eugenia Zorbas & Michael Koros, “A new deal for engagement in fragile states,” Conflict, Security & Development, vol. 12, no. 5, p.569. 3 International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding, “International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding Delegates agree major political commitments,” Press Release, Stockholm, April 2016, https://www.pbsbdialogue.org/en/news-events/5th- global-meeting/press-release/ 4 Op.Cit., “A new deal for engagement in fragile states.” 5 g7+, Note on the Fragility Spectrum, Kinshasa, 2013, http://www.pbsbdialogue.org/media/filer_public/17/43/17434d29-eb70- 425b-8367-7ccef13bfb0b/g7fragility_spectrum_2013.pdf; International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding, “Guidance Note on Fragility Assessments,” Fifth International Dialogue Working Group Meeting on New Deal Implementation, Freetown, June 17, 2014, http://www.pbsbdialogue.org/media/filer_public/d8/ae/d8ae82f3-1370-40d2-9e6e-cc0337ad4a84/new_deal_ fragility_assessment_guidance_2014.pdf. 6 Research has confirmed that citizens’ expectations of the state evolve as it becomes less fragile. A 2012 study found that in Rwanda and Nepal, where security is largely established, citizens’ expectations focused on service provision. This contrasted with South Sudan, where security was a priority, whereas service provision was an aspiration. See: Susy Ndaruhutse, Janice Dolan, Nigel Pearson et al., Synthesis Research Report: State-building, Peace-building and Service Delivery in Fragile and Conflict-affected States (Reading: CfBT Education Trust, 2012), p. 10. 7 Sian Herbert, Sequencing reforms in fragile states: Topic guide (Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham, 2014), p. 12. 38 A wicked problem | How to cooperate with collusive states? meaning jobs and public services, is ‘expected’. security, those in stable states focus on jobs and These functions coincide with the second cycle welfare, and those in the most developed states of centralisation, the centralisation of capital primarily seek a proper say in government. So- or ‘extraction’. A state that has achieved these cieties tolerate collusive relationships because two steps has a good basis for achieving both these offer a way of making the state both more internal and external legitimacy, the third cy- capable and more responsive: people do not cle. Unsurprisingly, the IDPS does not advocate just want security and justice, jobs and servic- collusion, but it does demand qualities that can es, representative government; they also want be derived from a more permissive approach - these things to be sympathetic to local or group resilience and inclusiveness. values. Governments see collusion as a way to boost their capabilities to coerce people, extract The five goals of the IDPS also chime neatly money from them and impose rules; but, by with the sequence of demands that societies colluding with criminals, states allow marginal put upon states and which drive societal ac- groups into administrative structures, poten- ceptance of collusion. People in the least de- tially making these more inclusive. veloped states are focused on basic justice and
The governance capacity model
Drawing on European history, and > Once the proto-state is able to provide modern-day trends, development can be justice and security, it can turn its atten- conceptualised as a five-stage sequence tion to building a stable national market, that, although by no means strict or auto- in turn providing economic opportunities matic, drives states towards better adminis- to its citizens. The tax revenue generated trative capacity: by economic activity creates an expecta- tion that the state will fund services. Jobs > The provision of justice is the foundation and services are ‘expected’ rather than of even the smallest, most informal com- ‘survival’ functions for the state, and munities and so is the most fundamental they involve a second cycle of centralisa- element of state-building. But the state tion (‘extractive’ capacities). can only apply justice equally across its territory by establishing a monopoly on > A state that has achieved these steps has violence, and this gives it a responsibility a good basis for achieving both internal for national security. Justice and security and external legitimacy. This involves the are the ‘survival’ functions of the state authority to make and break norms, and and they involve a first cycle of centrali- it involves a third cycle of centralisation. sation (‘coercive’ capacities). A se uence o state-building goals A sequence of state-building goals Societies accept crime as aa means means of pressing the state to fulfilfulfil five five core core functions. functions
COERCION EXTRACTION TRANSGRESSION