<<

Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU

Master's Theses Graduate College

8-1981

Dolomitization of the Brassfield ormationF (Lower ) in Adams County, Ohio

Lisa L. Varga

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses

Part of the Geology Commons

Recommended Citation Varga, Lisa L., "Dolomitization of the Brassfield ormationF (Lower Silurian) in Adams County, Ohio" (1981). Master's Theses. 1843. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1843

This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOLOMITIZATION OF THE (LOWER SILURIAN) IN ADAMS COUNTY, OHIO

by

Lisa L. Varga

A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geology

Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1981

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. WUU&yJuSUB!

DOLOMITIZATION OF THE BRASSFIELD FORMATION (LOWER SILURIAN) IN ADAMS COUNTY, OHIO

Lisa L. Varga, M.S.

Western Michigan University, 1981

The Lower S ilurian Brassfield Formation which outcrops in the

T ri-sta te area o f Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky is a transgressive sequence consisting of a series of interbedded shales,

and dolostones. Evidence from depositional environments, petro­

graphy and spatial relationships of dolomitized and undolomitized

rock suggests dolom itization in southwestern Ohio was a two-stage

process. Initial dolomitization was restricted to the basal Bel­

fa s t Member and probably occurred penecontemporaneously on small

supratidal islands in a manner analagous to that which occurs in the modern sabkha environment of the Persian Gulf. Regional dolo­

mitization was a later diagenetic event related to the formation of a fresh-seawater mixing zone beneath a landmass created by up-

warping of the Cincinnati Arch at the close of the Silurian. In­

tensity of dolomitization in the outcrop belt is controlled by the

proximity of the original carbonate to the source o f dolomitizing

fluids in the mixing zone.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. >•» —— «»«. -Tvte* iw n i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The w rite r would very much lik e to thank Dr. W illiam B. Harri

son III for his advice and assistance on this project. Dr. Harri­

son was most generous with his time and his u n fa ilin g good humor

was greatly appreciated. Acknowledgement is made to Dr. Thomas

Straw and Dr. John Grace who kindly read an early d ra ft and made

helpful suggestions.

F in a lly, I am grateful fo r the encouragement and moral supp­

ort provided by my family and friends. I thank you a ll.

The research for this study was partially funded by a grant

from the Graduate College o f Western Michigan U niversity.

Lisa L. Varga

11

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INFORMATION TO USERS

This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted.

The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction.

1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity.

2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame.

3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.

4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer Services Department.

5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases we have filmed the best available copy.

Uni I International 300 N. ZEEB RD.. ANN ARBOR. Ml 48106

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. I 1317257 ! j VARGA, LISA LOUISE DQLQMITIZATION OF THE BRASSFIELD FORMATION I (LOWER SILURIAN) IN ADAMS CDUNTY, OHIO•

WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY, M .S., 1981

U n i v e r s e Microfilms International 300 N. ZEEB RD., ANN ARBOR, Ml 48106

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PLEASE NOTE:

In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V

1. Glossy photographs or pages.

2. Colored illustrations, paper or print

3. Photographs with dark background ^

4. Illustrations are poor copy.

5. Pages with black marks, not original copy.

6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page.

7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages______

8. Print exceeds margin requirements_____

9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine______

10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print.

11. Page(s)______lacking when material received, and not available from school or author.

12. Page(s)______seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows.

13. Two pages numbered______. Text follows.

14. Curling and wrinkled pages _

15. Other ______

University Microfilms International

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...... 1i

LIST OF FIGURES ...... v

INTRODUCTION ...... 1 Geologic Setting ...... 1

Stratigraphic Nomenclature ...... 3

METHODOLOGY ...... ! ...... 7

Field and Laboratory Methods ...... 7 Terminology...... 7

STRATIGRAPHY ...... 14

General Statement ...... 14

Description of Stratigraphic Units 17

Belfast Member ...... 17

LowerMassively.Bedded B ra s s fie ld ...... 20

Thin Bedded Unit ...... 24 Upper Massive Unit ...... 24

Upper Thinly Bedded Brassfield ...... 24 DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS ...... 30

Introduction ...... 3 0

Tectonic Setting and Regional Paleogeography ...... 3 0

Stratigraphic Units and Facies Interpretations ...... 32

Supratidal to In te rtid a l and Lagoonal Facies . 32 Subtidal Shoal Facies ...... 37

Subtidal Open Marine Facies ...... 38

i i i

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Summary of Depositional Environments ...... 39

DOLOMITIZATION • • ...... • • • • . . . . * • • 41 Introduction ...... 41 Hypersaline Models of Dolom itization...... 42

Nonhypersaline Models of Dolomitization ...... 4 5

Brassfield Dolomite ...... 48

Distribution ...... 48

Petrography ...... 54 Suggested Origin o f Dolomite ...... 56 Timing o f Dolomitization ...... 65

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ...... 68

BIBLIOGRAPHY ...... 69

' ' 1v ' 1

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF FIGUBES

Figure Page

1. Brassfield outcrop in the Cincinnati Arch area . . . . . 2

2. Regional d is trib u tio n of Lower S iluria n rocks in the Cincinnati Arch area ...... 4

3. Stratigraphic nomenclature fo r the Brassfield Formation in the Ohio Valley area ...... 6

4. Study area and location o f sample sections ...... 8

5. Textural classification of carbonate rocks ...... 10

6. Photomicrograph showing p a rtia l dolom itization ..... 11

7. Photomicrograph showing strong d o lo m itiz a tio n . . . . . 11

8. Photomicrograph showing strongly dolomitized rock with only relict original texture preserved ...... 12

9.. Generalized stratigraphic column 15

10. Belfast Member exposed at the West Union section.... 18

11. Paraconformable contact between the and the Brassfield at the West Union section ...... 18

12. Lower massively bedded Brassfield a t the Manchester section ...... 19

13. Bioturbation of lower massively bedded Brassfield . . . 19

14. Thin bedded u n it exposed at the West Union section . . .2 1

15. Close-Up o f figure 14 ...... 22 16. Chert replacing a burrow in the th in bedded u n it .... 23

17. Upper massive u n it exposed a t the West Union section ...... 25

18. Upper th in ly bedded Brassfield exposed at the West Union section ...... 26

19. Megaripple in the upper thinly bedded Brassfield . . . . 27

v

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. I '

J

Figure Pa9e 20. Surface o f the bead bed ...... 29

21. Lateral distribution of Brassfield depositional environments ...... 33

22. Gypsum casts in the Belfast Member . . . . . « . . . . . 34

23. Laminae and b ird 's eye structures in the Belfast Member . 34

24. C lassification o f dolomite types, environments and mechanisms o f formation ...... 43 25. Distribution of Brassfield dolomite in the Cincinnati Arch area ...... 49

26. Photomicrograph showing the dolom itization o f fin e ­ grained matrix 51

27. Dolomitization o f burrow fillin g s and geopetal mud . . . 51

28. Photomicrograph showing the dolom itization o f the Belfast Member ...... 53

29. Photomicrograph showing preferential dolom itization along s ty o lite s ...... 53

30. Photomicrograph showing fine-grained anhedral dolomite . 55

31. Photomicrograph showing s o lita ry rhombs of euhedral dolomite ...... 55

32. Photomicrograph showing loosely intergrown euhedral dolomite ...... 57

33. Sabkha model fo r dolom itization ...... 59

34. Mixing zone model for dolomitization ...... 62

vi

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INTRODUCTION

The principal aim of this study was to investigate the occur-

ance, and propose a process fo r the genesis o f dolomite in the Brassfield Formation (Lower S iluria n) o f Adams County, Ohio. The

Brassfield rocks are a series of interbedded shales, limestones and

dolostones which outcrop in the Tri-S tate area of Ohio, Indiana

and Kentucky (Fig. 1). They are unique in the study area because

the rocks are not uniformly dolomitized. This irregularity in the

dolomite distribution is a major concern.

The enigmatic nature of ancient dolomite formation has been

considerably discussed within the geologic community in recent

years, and several models concerning the environments o f dolom iti­

zation have been advanced; fo r instance, seepage refluxion (Adams

and Rhodes, 1960), evaporative pumping (Hsu and Siegenthaler,

1969) and mixed water (Land and Epstein, 1970). The dolom itizing

mechanism o f the Brassfield Formation w ill be considered in view

o f the existing models.

Geologic Setting

The shales, limestones and dolostones of the Brassfield For­

mation form an arcuate outcrop belt on the flanks of the Cin­ cinnati Arch and overlie Upper rocks in a regional dis-

conformity. The Brassfield is thinner and less shaley on the

western side of the arch than on the eastern side, and the section

. 1

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2

WAYNE- MONTGOMERY V . ’-PREB^E'-.

GREENE./-.I*.

FRANKLIN

CINCINNATI • w • • HIGHLAN %

ADAMS/.; JENNINGS; SWIT­ ZERLAND OHIO

KY ^ e iv tu c^

ESSF » S BRASSFIELD aflem in g OUTCROP

sv MONTGOMERY

Vv-ESTILL

BOYLE ---MARIO 0 5 10 20 30 40

Fig. 1- B Lssfield outcrop in the C incinnati Arch area. M,*-ES

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3

thins southwestward from the study area to a pinchout near Stan­

ford, Kentucky.

The Brassfield rocks were deposited in an epeiric sea during

the Early to Middle Llandoverian (Berry and Boucot, 1970), (Fig.

2). Carbonate deposition at th is time was widespread and rela­

tively continuous although local evidence for short periods of

subareal exposure is present on the eastern side o f the arch.

According to recent reconstructions of paleogeographic positions,

the study area was situated between 10-20° south latitude (Dott

and Batten, 1976; Irving, 1979), within a climate and setting

which exists in many modern carbonate producing areas, such as

the Gulf o f Mexico and the Carribean. Islands in the Appalachian

belt known as'Taconian land shed sand and fine mud that was carried

westward influencing Brassfield sedimentation.in Ohio and Kentucky.

Local tectonism in the vicinity of the Cincinnati Arch was subtle

although gentle uplifts may have influenced Brassfield deposition

and diagenesis (McDowell and Peterson, 1980).

Stratigraphic Nomenclature

August Foerste (1885, 1896, 1904) was the pioneer worker

who form ally named the Brassfield fo r rocks exposed at

the type section in Madison County, Kentucky. Previously these

rocks had been miscorrelated with the Clinton group (Middle S il­

urian) o f New York by Orton (1890). Foerste recognized that

although the Ohio "Clinton" represented similar facies, it was not

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. So. Ohio Eastern Southern W estern system series Adams, Co. Kentucky Indiana

PEEBLES FM. ci .5 LAUREL LAUREL IS LS. LS. o o LILLEY "E FM. » -r i - w 0)i % BISHER FM. BISHER FM. OSGOOD OSGOOD CRAB CRAB FM. FM. o ORCHARD ORCHARD Z Q. ; < a FM. FM. * • ^ WiM cc D .ItlStll _l BRASSFIELD FM. W c CO BRASSFIELD BRASSFIELD * •aw FM. FM. o BRASSFIELD > Middle FM. o r '■o ■i * ; e □ Ik BELFAST BELFAST k MEM> MEM. M Lower ^Spf

c■ RICHMOND RICHMOND RICHMOND RICHMOND ■aai * > GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP a>• c■ ■ac C)• ■aE C.> ORDOVICIAN

Fig. 2- Generalized regional distribution of Lower Silurian rocks in the Cincinnati Arch area (modified from Berry and Boucot, 1970).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5

time equivalent with the New York Clinton. Above the Brassfield

Limestone, Foerste combined two formations, the Indian Fields and

Alger Formations, to form the Crab Orchard Group.

The term Brassfield Limestone was used as o rig in a lly proposed

u n til Rexroad, et a i- (1965) made several changes in the c la s s ifi­

cation (Fig. 3). Additionally O'Donnell (1967) further amended the

Brassfield Formation to include four general lithologic units in­

cluding the Noland Member. This study recognizes three of O'Donnell's proposed units;

1. Belfast Member, 2. lower massively bedded Brassfield, 3.

upper thinly bedded Brassfield. In Adams County additional thin

bedded and massively bedded units can be found between O'Donnell's

"lower massively bedded Brassfield" and "upper thinly bedded

B rassfield". Since these units may not be widely persistant or

recognizable, they w ill be treated informally within the scope

of this study (Fig. 3).

The Noland Member, designated as a formation by Rexroad, et

a l. (1965), is d ifficu lt to trace or correlate north of Bath County,

Kentucky and is not recognized in Ohio (Harrison, personal comm.).

Furthermore, the jo in t U.S. Geological Survey and Kentucky Geolog­

ica l Survey did not include the Noland in th e ir mapping program

(Peck, 1967). Therefore, the Noland is disregarded by this study

in favor o f the fo r rocks which overlie

the Brassfield Formation.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. a* u n it u n it Lower Lower Upper Upper Lower Lower Upper Upper Belfast Plum Plum Creek M br./unit Brassfield Brassfield th in ly bedded th in ly bedded massively bedded massively bedded THIS THIS STUDY ■n m r~ CO t—1 00 ■5. CRAB Fm. ORCHARD Lower Upper Upper Noland Belfast massive Brassfield Brassfield M br./unit th in ly bedded WT o'l T " T l 2 C/) CO t—4 m r- 00 DAYTON • Mbr. Fm. Belfast Plum Creek Plum ~n CO CO »—i m r- REXRQjygjil. . CO Fm. NOLAND Mbr. • Plum Plum Creek m ■n 30 CO r~ CO ►—i m 03 • Fm. INDIAN FIELDS Fig. 3- Stratigraphic nomenclature for the Brassfield Fm. in the Ohio valley area.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. METHODOLOGY

Field and Laboratory Methods

Three outcrop sections o f the Brassfield Formation were

measured and described in detail from Adams County, Ohio on the

eastern flank o f the Cincinnati Arch (Fig. 4). Several additional

outcrops were examined and these observations were used to supple­

ment data from the three major sections. Sections were measured

with a jacob's staff and a Stratex surveying micro-altimeter was

used to crosscheck elevations. Samples were collected from every

major carbonate bed, while shales were described in situ. One

hundred polished slabs were made and representative thin sections

from each measured section were examined. Both slabs and thin

sections were etched and stained with Alizarin Red S (Dickson,

1965) to more easily distinguish calcite from dolomite. Selected

slabs were stained with a solution of potassium ferricyanide (Dick

son, 1965) so the type and amount of ferroan dolomite could be

assessed. A modified Wentworth grain-size scale (Folk, 1962) was

used fo r a ll grain measurements.

Terminology

Dolomitic rocks of the Brassfield Formation retain much of

their original depositional texture despite diagenesis. This is

particularly true in Ohio where the rocks are not as strongly al­

tered as they are in Kentucky. Textural properties and composit­

ional data are prerequisites for interpretation of depositional

7

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8

ADAMS COUNTY OHIO

Belfast section

Ohio

PEEBLES

Ohio 247

** West Union section

WEST UNION Ohio 125 Ohio

C* Manchester section Ohio

flhio jy

______. — measured-sampled section

mi^es ° * observed section Fig. 4- Study area and location of sample sections.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. environments,- therefore, the terminology o f Dunham (1962) is used

in this study (Fig. 5). Following the suggestion of Gordon (1980),

Dunham's terms w ill be followed by a Roman numeral which indicates

the corresponding "Energy Index" as proposed by Plumley e t a l.

(1962) and modified by Catalov (1972), (Fig. 5). The energy index

provides a genetic classification based on the energy that existed

in the depositional environment. Textural data of important con­

sideration are size, sorting, roundness of the allochems, and the

degree of winnowing. The four textural levels of the energy in ­

dex are related to the degree of water agitation.

The combination of Dunham's textural classification and the

energy index concept provide a more detailed description o f the

physical environment o f deposition. For example, packstone ( I I I )

indicates the original sediment was grain-supported, and deposited

in moderately agitated water.

Where do!omitic rocks are discussed Dunham's terminology

(along with the corresponding energy index) w ill be prefixed by

terms that indicate the degree of dolomitic alteration. Powers (1962) offered the terms, "partially dolomitized" for rocks which

display 10-75% discrete dolomite rhombs and "strongly dolomitized"

where 25-75% of the rock is interlocking dolomite (Figs. 6 and 7).

Dolomite with "re lic o riginal texture" is more than 75% in te rlo ck­

ing dolomite where original texture is s till recognizable (Fig.

8). Usually only ghosts o f original texture remain. "C rystalline

dolomite" has no recognizable original texture and consequently

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CRYSTALLINE DOLOMITE

o ri gi nal texture o b ii terated

DOLOMITE WITH RELIC ORIGINAL TEXTURE

more than 75% interlocking dolomite

STRONGLY DOLOMITIZED

25-75% interlocking dolomite

PARTIALLY DOLOMITIZED

10-75% discrete dolomite rhombs

LjJ CC • a UJ UJ 3 z CO UJ CO X ■"—» z - a UJ E o c z c U l CM o 3 z H- *1 11 o • r — I— CO 1— E o CO t o (O 1— (O t o 1—’ c UJ S- t o S_ — 1 «—I • z CO t o • r — X c n a O l eC «. »—1 JC X rO o = 3 a o +-» «=c OS n>E § ro C o o *—i JZ •COCL o r-H H 1— C a A V to»-* o 3 O '— a . grain-supported mud-supported

■ cn ■ ( 9 --- e c j CU (O (U CU o s c cn T3 +j - o r - + j •a 4-> ■o +» , CO OJ CU ro cu >» «a CU r a +J r— s -H 4-> 2 ■P r - 3 +* 5 .> - > •r“ OJ *r“ ro •r- 4J •r- Classification their of altered carbonate rocks texture. according to their original texture and CO O Ul CTJ CL-.— 4J Q.'i“ i z +-> 23 co +j 23 a* O cn

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 6- Photomicrograph o f sample WU- 24 showing p a rtia l dolo- . mitization of matrix (x 11.2).

Fig. 7- Photomicrograph o f sample WU- 12 displaying strong dolomitic alteration (x 11.2).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 8- Photomicrograph o f sample WU- 5 showing strong dolomiti- zation. Note the relict original texture preserved By the dark laminae (x 11.2).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 13

cannot be cla s sifie d on the basis o f depositional fa b ric although

some generalizations can usually be made based on crystal size or

relict structures.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

General Statement

The Brassfield Formation as defined by th is study, in Adams

County, Ohio consists of fiv e lith o lo g ic un its, only one o f which

is formally recognized as a member (Figure 3). The Brassfield

Formation at the West Union location is the thickest exposure of

Brassfield strata (16 meters) in the entire outcrop belt. South-

westward along strike, the rocks thin to a point near Stanford,

Kentucky where the formation is truncated by pre- erosion.

To the north near Dayton, Ohio and on the western side of the

Cincinnati Arch in Indiana, the formation thins to average thick­

nesses of 10 meters and 3 meters, respectively. Consequently,

in most sections outside Adams County some of the component stratigraphic units recognized in this study are missing or un­

recognizable. For example, the Belfast Member attains its maximum

thickness at the West Union section and pinches out near the Ohio

River at the Manchester section. At the Manchester section the

lower massive Brassfield directly overlies Ordovician rocks. There­

fore, the composite stratigraphic section (Fig. 9) illu s tra tin g

Brassfield stratigraphy in the study area cannot be s tr ic tly

applied to other Brassfield outcrops outside southwestern Ohio.

In general, the Brassfield is disconformable with the under­

lying Cincinnatian Formations of the Richmond Group in the Ohio

valley region. Contacts are sharp and well-defined. However, in

14

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. /

15

i

AGE ONLAP-OFFLAP TEXTURE FM. METERS

packstone —■

— ID m

— 5

MckMtone SSJS

■udstone L- 0

Fig. 9- Generalized stratigraphic column of the Brassfield Formation in southwestern Ohio.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 16

Adams County, notably at the West Union and Belfast sections of

this study, the contact hetween the Ordovician Preachersville

Member of the Drakes Formation and the Belfast Member o f the Brass­

fie ld Formation is more subtle. The shales and siltstones o f the

two formations were deposited in sim ilar environments without any

pronounced physical evidence fo r a break in sedimentation. This

apparent paraconformity and the evidence about water depth i t

provides has been discussed by Gray and Boucot (1972). Data based

on acritarchs and spore tetrads indicates water depths no deeper

than in te rtid a l, or possibly even nonmarine environments at the

top of the Ordovician and in the lower portion of the Belfast.

Water depth increases higher into the Belfast. Depth zonation

for higher Brassfield beds which contain megafossils can be a-

ssigned by c rite ria proposed by Ziegler (1965) and Ziegler and

Boucot (1970). In the study area the top of the Brassfield is defined by a

prominant, biostratigraphic marker bed, in the upper shales of

the upper th in ly bedded Brassfield. The "bead bed", as i t is

commonly known (Rexroad et al_., 1965), is a distinct megarippled

bed containing large columnals. Geographically the beds are

found on the east side o f the Cincinnati Arch from Dayton, Ohio to

Birmingham, Alabama (O'Donnell, 1967). The contact w ith the Brass­

field and the overlying limestones and shales of the Crab Orchard

Formation is gradational.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 17 Description of Stratigraphic Units

Belfast Member

The Belfast Member consists of a series of thinly-bedded

dolomitic, light gray siltstones and shales (Fig. 10). It is 1-2

meters th ick and rests paraconformably on Ordovician shales (Gray

and Boucot, 1972). There is a slight lithologic and color change

marking the contact (Fig. 11). Si Itstone beds are fla t or slightly

undulate and are usually finely (less than 1cm) laminated. The

laminations have a thin (organic?) film separating each pair.

Quartz s ilt is common in some beds. A distinctive 4-8 cm thick

siltstone has flute or load casts on its base which trend to the

northwest. Since th is bed was only observed at two nearby locat­

ions, it must have been a very localized pulse of energy.

other than very sparse vertical burrows are rare. Petrographically

the dolomitized Belfast Member displays only re lic t original texture

but represents former argillaceous mudstones (I).

Lower Massively Bedded Brassfield

The lower massive Brassfield is a widely persistant, blocky,

re la tiv e ly homogeneous, ledge-former above the Belfast Member

(Fig. 12). I t sometimes appears as a single massive bed 1.5-2

meters th ic k , although near the top o f the u n it very thin shale partings separate irregular bedding surfaces. The unit is ex­

tremely bioturbated (Fig. 13). Megafossils, including

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 18

Fig. 10- Interbedded shales and siltstones o f the upper Belfast Member exposed at the West Union section. Note the gently undulating bedding.

Fig. 11- Paraconformable contact between the Ordovician Drakes Fm. and the Belfast Member of the Brassfield Fm. Hammer pick rests on the contact.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 19

Fig. 12- Lower massively bedded Brassfield at the Manchester section. Hammer rests on sandy lens.

Fig. 13- Horizontal branching burrows characteristic of the lower massively bedded Brassfield.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 20

disarticulated crinoid columns, and solitary rugose , occur

w ithin the shale partings. The contact between the lower massive

Brassfield and the thin bedded unit is gradational, but a zone

of glauconite and manganese oxide (black staining) is character­ istic of the uppermost lower massive Brassfield. Petrographically,

the strongly dolomitized lower massive Brassfield is also a form­

er mudstone ( I) .

Thin Bedded Unit

The thin bedded unit ,is a sequence of alternating gray,

splintery shales and partially dolomitized limestone beds (2-10

cm th ic k ), which is approximately 1.5 meters in to ta l thickness

(Fig. 14). Many limestone beds appear lumpy or nodular due to

bioturbation by large organisms (Fig. 15). Other limestones are

finely laminated (less than 1 cm) and appear to be deposited by

interruptive bursts of higher energy. Fossils other than traces,

become more common and assemblages, more diverse upward. Crin-

oids, s o lita ry rugose cora l, brachiopods and are p le n tifu l

in certain layers. Higher in the section discontinuous chert

stringers within the nodular beds may be related to burrowing

(Fig. 16). Petrographically these rocks are mainly wackestones

( I I ) and packstones ( I I I ) and are among the least dolomitized

rocks in the study sections.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 14- Thin bedded unit exposed at the West Union section.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 15- Close-up of a portion of the thin bedded unit at the West Union section showing lumpy or nodular bedding.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 16- Large burrow in the thin bedded unit pre fe re n tia lly replaced by chert.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 24

Upper Massive Unit

The upper massive u n it is a d is tin c t chert-bearing u n it which

is 1.2-1.6 meters th ick in the study area (Fig. 17). Although

the unit appears massively-bedded, thin shale partings occur at

30 to 40 cm intervals. Bioturbation is very localized. Surfaces

o f fa lle n slabs appear nobby and mounds o f diverse fauna represent

isolated well-developed conmunities. Occasionally these mounds

are wholly or partially replaced by chert.

Generally, the white chert is globose, associated with glau­

conite, and often richly fossiliferous. Some nodules contain

pyrite . O'Donnell (1967) found th a t, going from north to south,

the chert is found progressively lower in the section. The unit

is strongly dolomitized and probably represents former wackestones

( I I ) , packstones ( I I I ) and grainstones (IV ).

Upper Thinly Bedded Brassfield

The interbedded shales and dolomitic limestones above the.

upper massive u n it are known as the upper th in ly bedded Brass­

fie ld (Fig. 18). Limestones rarely exceed thicknesses o f 30 cm.

Some display high-energy features including large-scale ripples

(wave-lengths reaching 100 cm) (Fig. 19), cross-bedding and scour

and f ill structures. Shale interbeds are much thicker (up to

100 cm) than shales in lower Brassfield units. Bioturbation is

restricted to a few muddy horizons. This unit contains the most

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 17- Upper massive unit exposed at the West Union section. Note the large globose masses o f white chert.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 18- Upper th in ly bedded Brassfield exposed at the West Union section. Note the thick shale beds and the megarippled horizon at the meter s tic k .

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 27

Fig. 19- Megarippled bed characteristic o f the upper upper th in ly bedded Brassfield. Wave-length is approximate­ ly 100 cm.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 28

fossiliferous strata, including the "bead bed", the conventional

marker fo r the top o f the Brassfield, which is a megarippled

horizon composed of a variety of quite large (0.5-2.5 cm in dia­

meter) crinoid columnals (Fig. 20). Beds of hematite coated bio­ clasts and intraclasts occur near the top of the section and were

once mined locally as an iron ore. The limestones are partially

to strongly dolomitized. They represent wackestones ( I I ) through

grainstones (IV ), w ith packstones ( I I I ) being most predominant.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 29

Fig. 20- Surface o f the megarippled "bead^bed" exposed at the West Union section. Note the variety of crinoid columnals.

*

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. )

DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS

Introduction

Different lithostratigraphic units often represent different

environments o f deposition or facies. Each may undergo d iffe re n t

diagenetic histories producing different textures and mineralogies.

Original sedimentary texture is indicative o f the energy which ex­

isted in the depositional environment while diagenetically altered

textures reflect post-depositional environments. Altered textures

of the Brassfield units show a relationship between original

sedimentary texture and the type and extent of dolomitization.

Therefore study of the Brassfield depositional environments pro­

vides clues which help to clarify many of the complexities of

diagenetic alteration.

Tectonic Setting and Regional Paleoqeoqraphv

The Brassfield rocks were deposited in a shallow, northwest­

wardly transgressing sea across a gently sloping, slightly irregular shelf. A world-wide Llandoverian (Early Silurian) transgression

due to melting of Late Ordovician-Early Silurian glaciers in the

southern hemisphere has been documented by Berry and Boucot (1973)

and McKerrow (1979). In addition, minor eustatic fluctuations in

sea level continued throughout the Silurian resulting in several

short pulses o f sea level change (Sheehan, 1975).

The platform on which the Brassfield was deposited in the

30

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Ohio valley region was generally of low relief although locally

several high areas may have existed and influenced sedimentation.

Foerste (1904) and Rexroad (1967) discussed the Ripley Island

or Ripley positive area in southwestern Indiana where Brassfield

strata are missing apparently due to nondeposition. Gordon (1980)

also postulated a high area in east-central Kentucky where the

absence o f the B elfast Member may be evidence o f subareal exposure

during in itia l Brassfield deposition. The Cincinnati Arch must

have affected sedimentation although scattered outliers across the

crest suggest inundation o f th is area during at least part o f

Brassfield deposition (Foerste, 1906). Thinning of section west-

wardly across the arch and the absence of elastics on the western

flank suggest the arch must have acted as some sort of barrier to

sedimentation. In southwestern Ohio this influence is negligible,

but.in Kentucky, flexure of the insipiant arch had a pronounced

e ffe ct on Brassfield sedimentation (Gordon, 1980). Basal con­

glomerates, strom atolites, mudcracks and the dominance o f high-

energy very near-shore environments suggest synsedimentary u p lift

south of Bath County, Kentucky which did not exist to the north

along depositional strike. This implies a shallow-water to deep-

water facies change, south to north, controlled by flexure of the

insipiant arch which may have sim ilarly affected Upper Ordovician

formations in the area (Weir & Peck, 1968). The facies change

along strike northeastward into Ohio. Individual units become

thicker, more shaley and less dominated by high-energy regimes.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 32 Overall Brassfield sedimentation in the study area was continuous

in a steadily transgressing sea that was only slightly affected

by the gentle upwarping to the southwest.

S tratigraphic Units and Facies Interpretations

The vertical sequence of facies in the Brassfield represent

transgressing environments which migrated la te ra lly over each

other through time. In ascending order the B elfast Member, lower

massively bedded B rassfield, thin bedded u n it, upper massive unit

and upper thinly bedded Brassfield display depositional textures,

structures and fo s s ils that suggest these units were deposited

as three major facies representing deepening marine environments.

These facies are 1.) supratidal to intertidal and lagoonal, 2.)

subtidal shoal and, 3.) subtidal open marine (Fig. 21).

Supratidal to In te rtid a l and Lagoonal Facies

The laminated, non-fossiliferous mudstones (I) of the Bel­

fast Member are indicative of deposition in a very quiet low-en­

ergy environment (Fig. 21). In fa ct the presence of gypsum casts

(Fig. 22) in the basal Belfast combined with evidence of land-

derived spore tetrads (Gray and Boucot, 1972) suggests an in itia l

phase of supratidal conditions. The supratidal environment was

however, short-lived as the bulk of the Belfast rocks represent in­

tertidal to very shallow subtidal environments. Do!omitic mudstones

(I) with brown algal (?) films between thin (0.2 cm) laminae and

bird's eye structures are interpreted to record middle to upper

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. >IE LAGOONAL Brassfield bedded unit unit bedded Brassfield ' , Belfast massive Lower Lower th in ly Upper massively Upper th in ly bedded MUDSTONE MUDSTONE MUDSTONE PACKSTONE WACKESTONE LAMINATED BURROWED WACKESTONE GRAINSTONE STONE PACK SUPRATIDAL SUPRATIDAL INTERTIDAL SHOAL SUBTIDAL Fig. 21- Lateral distribution of Brassfield facies equivalents.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 34

Fig. 22- Gypsum casts preserved in the lower Belfast Member

Fig. 23- Laminae (A) and bird 's eye structures (B) in the lower Belfast Member.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 35 in te rtid a l environments where algal mats developed on carbonate

muds (Fig. 23). Although no desiccation cracks were observed in

the fie ld some irre g u la rly shaped b ird 's eye structures, obvious

in polished slabs, may be internal or "healed mudcracks". These

are believed to originate from internal shrinkage of the muds

resulting from their dehydration during subareal exposure (Laporte,

1967). Often fine-grained layers in the lower Brassfield mudstones

are selectively dolomitized. This preferential dolomitization

of fine-grained laminae may be the result of evaporation at the

algal mat surface bringing magnesium-rich sea water upward through

the sediment by ca p illa ry action. This process suggested by Shinn

et al_. (1965), results in dolomite being precipitated at the mat

surface as a fine-grained layer. This in itia l stage of dolomiti­

zation produced d is tin c t dolomitic laminae in the algal sediments

of the lower Brassfield and supports the shallow intertidal in­

terpretation. Oscillatory ripple marks and increased infaunal activity

characterize the lower intertidal zone and marks the gradational

contact between the Belfast Member and lower massively bedded

Brassfield. The lower massively bedded Brassfield represents

lower intertidal to shallow subtidal facies (Fig. 21). It is

intensely burrowed and bioturbated (Fig. 13). Murray (1975) in

his study of trace fossils in the Brassfield attributed the pro­

lific browsing and burrowing activity in this unit to deposit

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 36 feeding worms: These organisms e xp lo it n u trie n t-ric h layers.

Their horizontal, branching burrows form tie rs in the sediment

and consequently erase any additional intertidal imprint.

Occasionally the mottled mudstones (I) of the lower massively

bedded Brassfield are interrupted by liminated, grainy, lensoid

beds (not more than 25 cm th ic k ). These beds may represent in te r­

tid a l channels which form wedges o f sandy sediment brought onto

the in te rtid a l zone by storms rather than tides (James, 1979).

The re su lt is a layer o f coarser, sandy debris le f t behind as a lag

deposit. Small (1-2 cm) s o lita ry rugose coral, scattered crinoid col-

umnals and higher-energy rock textures suggest subtidal environ­

ments in the upper lower massively bedded Brassfield. The unit

grades into wackestone ( I I ) and packstones ( I I I ) o f the thin

bedded un it.

Since the intertidal rocks of the lower Brassfield exemplify

a muddy low-energy system, i t follows that deposition must have

occurred in a protected location; that is protected from waves and

swells which would produce a high-energy beach zone. A protective

ba rrie r such as a shoal (Fig. 21) dissipates wave energy and in

the lee of this barrier, provides a protected environment, a lagoon.

The Belfast and lower massively bedded Brassfield were deposited in

a muddy intertidal to logoonal environment protected from wave

processes by a seaward shoal. The lim ited areal extent o f the units

in southwestern Ohio and northern east-central Kentucky also suggests

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 37

a restricted depositional environment. Supratidal flats were

not extensive and were only developed lo c a lly in southwestern Ohio.

Subtidal Shoal Facies

The depositional textures and sedimentary structures of the

upper massive unit are suggestive of a high-energy or shoaling

environment above wave base. The packstones ( I I I ) and grain-

stones (IV) of this unit are highly fossiliferous. In fact, mounds

of diverse invertebrate fauna often in life position which are dom­

inated by , s o lita ry rugose coral, and associated bryozoan

assemblages may represent bioherms which could flo u ris h in the

agitated environment. Wilson (1975) discussed the baffling action

produced by thickets of crinoids. The organic activity usually

begins below wave base. Binding, trapping and encrusting o f

organic debris and sediment by these organisms eventually builds

mounds which are colonized by successive generations of crinoids

and bryozoans. Continued b a fflin g and building results in a mound

which intersects wave base and dissipates open ocean energy. The

large masses of chert which characterize this unit seem to be a

replacement type preferentially altering all or portions of these

fossiliferous buildups. Sheltered areas between the mounds, and

sediment deposited on the lee side of the shoal (represented by

rocks o f the th in bedded u n it) are muddier wackestones ( I I ) . In-

faunal activity was minimal. A few large burrows, probably pro­

duced by trilobites or other arthropods (Murray, 1975), penetrated

the muddier sediments o f the back shoal.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 38 These rocks are interrupted by several stratified grainstone

(IV) beds (10 cm th ic k ). The beds are often graded and contain

well-rounded quartz s ilt. The sedimentologic character of these

rocks suggests rapid deposition, probably during storms.

The th in bedded u n it and upper massive u n it represent a shoal­

ing bank which was dissected with channels o f wel1-winnowed

sketeletal sands deposited during storms. The communities

which thrived on these banks were necessarily capable of withstand­

ing high-energy conditions.

Subtidal Open Marine Facies

A change in regime is indicated where rocks o f the upper massive

unit grade in to the upper th in ly bedded Brassfield. Interbedded

dolomitic limestone beds are separated by th ick (up to 100 cm)

fis s ile shale sequences. The shales indicate a return to quieter

energy conditions. Original wackestone ( I I ) and packstone ( I I I )

textures suggest that this environment was only occasionally agi­

tated. Sedimentary structures such as crossbedding, graded bedding

and scours are best developed in the lower portion o f the u n it. Thicknesses o f shale interbeds and the abundance o f burrowers

greatly increase toward the top. This suggests a gradual deepening

of the Brassfield subtidal environment resulting in a transition

from shallow to deeper open marine facies (Fig. 21). Fossil

d ive rs ity is moderate to high and again, crinoids dominate. Sev­

eral megarippled horizons contain fossil allochems which are well-

rounded and abraded. These beds may represent transported and

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 39 mixed assemblages which were deposited as major storms lowered

wave base and disrupted the quieter energy conditions which pre­

vailed on the shelf. The fossiliferous "bead bed" is a megarippled

packstone ( I I I ) formed during such a high-energy event. The "bead

bed" interrupts a thick shale sequence in the uppermost Brassfield

that was deposited as the Brassfield sea reached its maximum level

of inundation.

The depositional environment represented by the upper thinly

bedded Brassfield was a steadily deepening, open marine, shallow

shelf environment where quiet energy conditions were predominant

as water depth increased.

Summary o f Depositional Environments

The Brassfield Formation represents a transgressive sequence

of carbonate rocks. Facies existed contemporaneously and migrated

northwestward across the Ohio valley region (for a detailed des­

c rip tio n of depositional environments in east-central Kentucky,

see Gordon, 1980). In southwestern Ohio small islands o f low

r e lie f, lying ju s t above normal high tid e level were covered by

algal mats. Prim itive vascular plants may have colonized these

supratidal fla ts as algal growth stablized the sediment. The

supratidal zone sloped gently, eventually becoming alternately

inundated and drained by tides. Browsing and burrowing organisms

exploited the rich organic layers of the intertidal flats. Tidal

waters flooding these fla ts cut channels or creeks which during

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 40 storms would deposit coarser-grained sediment, as a lag deposit

on the fine-grained muds. The adjacent subtidal (lagoonal) areas

were sites of slow, low-energy deposition suggesting the existance

of a barrier shoal. The lagoon which existed in the lee o f th is

barrier was protected from the fu ll force of ocean waves and

swells. The shoal was formed by a belt of crinoid gardens, sup­

porting a diverse fauna which could thrive in the high-energy en­

vironment. The crinoid bars were not continuous, but were breached

by channels tha t may have migrated la te ra lly through time. The

shelf on which these bars existed gradually deepened seaward, and

quiet, low-energy conditions were established below normal wave-

base. Deposition of thick shale sequences was periodically in­

terrupted by storms which lowered wave base and deposited mega­

rippled bodies o f abraded skeleltal sands. When the storms passed

quiet, deeper water sedimentation resumed.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DOLOMITIZATION

Introduction

Dolomite is a complex carbonate mineral which seems to form

under a variety of natural conditions, where the dolomitizing

solution is oversaturated with respect to dolomite. Many chemical environments should be conducive fo r dolomite formation. However,

no one has yet synthesized dolomite under temperature and pressure

conditions typical of modern sedimentary environments. Synthesis

of dolomite at elevated temperatures (greater than 100°C) has been

accomplished and is re la tiv e ly uncomplicated (Gaines, 1980). The

most s ig n ific a n t advances made on the problem of dolomite genesis

have come from the studies of natural modern dolomites and their

ancient analogs.

It is generally agreed that most dolomite is a replacement

product. This "secondary" dolomite is formed during early or late

stages o f diagenesis by replacement of some calcium carbonate

sediment precusor. The small amount o f dolomite considered "p ri­

mary" is formed by direct precipitation usually in hypersaline

lakes. Knowledge of the depositional setting is useful in dis -

tinguishing primary and secondary dolomites as well as the timing

of the secondary event. Evidence fo r the m ultiple origins of large bodies o f dolo-

mitized rock is extensive and several models have been proposed to

account for the variety of geologic settings and formative processes

41

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 42 which y ie ld dolomite (.Fig. 24). Discovery o f "Recent" dolomite

in the Persian Gulf ■ tillin g 'e t aL., 1965) and on Andros Island

(Shinn et al_., 1965) helped reconcile the discrepancy between the

large amounts of and lower Paleozoic dolomite and the

lack of any significant amounts of late Cenozoic dolomite. In

addition, the Holocene discoveries helped fuel the popular concept

of the necessity of hypersaline solutions for dolomitizing processes.

Hypersaline Models of Dolomitization

Dolomite formed by brines with a high Mg/Ca ratio are associated

with evaporite deposits. Original evaporite minerals may be pre­

served, but often these minerals are removed or obscured by later

dissolution or diagenetic change. However, evidence of vanished

evaporitic minerals has been found and has been discussed in

d e tail by Friedman (1980).

Two methods for the formation of dolomite by hypersaline brines

have been favored in the literature. Both involve the transpor­

tation of brines through carbonate sediment. Adams and Rhodes

(1960) proposed the seepage refluxion model in which reflu x of brines through the sediment by gravitational forces caused dolom itization

along porous zones where the brines seeped through the underlying

sediment. Development of a restricted lagoon or tidal fla t where

evaporation concentrated the brine and caused evaporites to form

is a prerequisite fo r the model. Sears and Lucia (1980) have also

suggested a refluxing mechanism fo r one phase o f dolom itization

in the pinnacle reefs of Northern Michigan. The seepage reflux

model has also been applied by other authors.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. metamorphlc Late (teleogenetlc) r i 1 hydrothermal b u ria l SECONDARY Intermediate (nesogenetlc) re flu x seepage E a rly organic dolom ite (eogenetlc) zone m ixing QNITIZATION j DOL (hu m id). coroonicoroong PENECONTEHPORANEOUS (a rid ) sabkha lakes PRIMARY hypersaline Fig. 24- Classification of dolomite types, environments of and mechanisms formation.

with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

o CD Q.

- 5 O Q. C CD ■ o 44

Evaporation at the sediment-air interface in arid supratidal

zones concentrates pore fluids into hypersaline brines. These

fluids subsequently rise from the shallow water table by capillary

forces causing the precipitation of gypsum (and other evaporites)

and the replacement o f aragonitic sediment by dolomite. The

"sabkha" or evaporative pumping model has been suggested fo r the

penecontemporaneous, modern dolomites o f the Persian Gulf region

and has been investigated by many workers ( Illin g e t a]_., 1965;

Kinsman, 1969; McKenzie, et al_. 1980). A sabkha is a s a lt f la t ,

and the broad supratidal flats of the Persian Gulf are areas of

arid, evaporitic conditions where periodic marine flooding augments

the water supply lost to evaporation. In contrast, the Coorong

district of southern Australia is a humid region where evaporitic

dolomite is formed in ephemeral, alkaline lakes situated behind

a modern coastal dune barrier or on the inner portion of a broad

coastal plain (von der Borch, 1965; Muir et al_., 1980).

The Coorong model o f dolom itization is an example o f penecon­

temporaneous evaporitic dolomitization in a humid climate rather

than an arid sabkha environment and expands the premise preferred

by Friedman (1980) tha t most dolomites form under conditions of

hypersalinity. Although it is clear that many dolomite formations

in the recent and ancient geologic record owe their origin to re­

action of calcium carbonate sediment with hypersaline brines, this

model needs to be reconciled with widespread dolomitic facies

which represent shallow marine, subtidal environments and are in

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 45 no way associated with evaporitic minerals or their traces. Al­

though subtidal deposition does not necessarily preclude later

dolom itization by hypersaline waters, where there is no evidence

of later hypersaline conditions in the rock record other dolo­

m itizing mechanisms must be considered.

Nonh.ypersaline Models o f Dolomitization

Studies by RunnelIs (1969), Land and Epstein (1970), Badio-

zamani (1973) and Folk and Land (1975) have shown that dolomite

can form in fresh or brackish waters with Mg/Ca ratios as low as

1:1 provided a slow rate of crystallization. This "dorag" or mixed

water model fo r dolomitization has been applied by Hanshaw et al_.,

(1971) fo r Florida and Yucatan, Badiozamani (1973) fo r the Ordo­

vician of Wisconsin, Land (1973a) for the Pleistocene of Jamaica,

and others for nonhypersaline dolomites associated with shallow

epicontinental shelves or structural highs. The mechanism involves

the creation of a zone of brackish water saturated with dolomite

(undersaturated with calcite) due to mixing of fresh meteoric and

sea waters. Folk and Land (1975) suggest tha t dolomite can form

readily under these conditions, but as salinity and crystallization

rates increase the Mg/Ca ra tio at which dolomite can f ir s t form

rises u n til values o f 5:1 or 10:1 are reached in hypersaline

environments. Therefore, the lower the salinity, the easier dolo­

mite forms, since the concentration o f competing ions is reduced.

Work on Andros Island by Gebelein et al., (1980) has verified

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 46 the existance of disordered "protodolmite" in peritidal sediments

below palm hammocks that are underlain by fresh water lenses. The

dolom itic sediment does not s tr ic tly coincide with the fresh or

mixed water zones but may be related to burrows, desiccation cracks or organic material that allow the migration of dolomitizing

waters. Other work by Gebelein and Hoffman (1973) indicates that

dolomitic laminae in ancient carbonates may also be related to an

organic origin. Algal mats may act as a source of magnesium for

penecontemporaneous or secondary dolom itization along alg a l-rich

layers. This mechanism has been suggested fo r recent dolomitic

laminae in the Bahamas (Shinn et a l., 1965) and for ancient rocks

by Gebelein and Hoffman (1973).

Other aspects of dolomitization include cannibalization of

pre-existing Mg-rich sediment. This process produces small amounts

o f dolomite and has been reported in the Bahamas by Goodell and

Garman (1969).

Deep burial, late diagenetic dolomitization can occur on a

local scale as long as there is a source of magnesium-bearing

flu id s such as a shale basin (Mattes and Mountjoy, 1980). This

latter type of dolomite grades into hydrothermal, essentially meta-

morphic dolomite, often associated w ith base metal ore deposits

(Engle e ta ^ ., 1958).

It is clear from the preceeding discussion that dolomite is

known to form in a variety of environments and at varying stages

in the history of a sediment body. I t seems no one model or so­

lu tio n can be applied universally to the many types and occurances

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. of dolomite. Even w ithin the various models, sediment or fabric

selectivity can affect the degree of dolomitization.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Brassfield Dolomite

The carbonate rocks o f the Brassfield Formation are not uni­

formly dolomitized. Dolomitization ranges from 100% near the southern-most exposure of the outcrop b e lt to less than 5% in

some beds of the northern portion (Fig. 25). Dolomitization is

most pronounced in east-central Kentucky. Rocks in the study area

are partially dolomitized and seem to represent a transition be­

tween a dolomite suite to the south and a limestone suite to the

north. It is likely that the rocks in southwestern Ohio lie on

some sort o f boundary between where dolomitizing flu id s had a pro­

found effect in Kentucky and where rocks were minimally or unaffect­

ed in Ohio and Indiana.

Distribution

The distribution of dolomite in the Brassfield Formation may

be controlled by the physical chemical nature of the original

texture of the individual rock units or by the availability of dolomitizing solutions. In as much as the Brassfield rocks studied

in Adams Co., Ohio occur along the boundary between dolomitized and

undo!omitized rocks i t could be assumed that the sediment had lim ited

access to the dolomitizing waters. In addition preferential dolo­

mitization of the Brassfield carbonates was apparently a fabric

selective process.

The most striking correlation between dolomitization and de-

positional fabric is the strong preference for dolomite to replace

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 49

• >5

22

> 9 5 > 95

100 88

A.Shub Fig. 25- Median percentage o f dolomite (carbonate fra ctio n ) inMedian the Brassfield Fm. (modified from O'Donnell, 1967).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission rocks which were originally deposited as lime muds. Murray and

Lucia (1967) noted the su sce p tib ility o f fine-grained sediments

to preferential dolomitization in rocks in Alberta,

Canada. They suggested a number o f in te ra ctive physical factors

to explain this selectivity. Such factors as permeability, and

particle size, reflective of the surface area available to react

with fluids, are important aspects. Since coarser-grained units

of the Brassfield must have had greater in titia l permeabilities

than the muddy sediments, early calcitic cementation or U n ific a ­

tion of the coarser-textured rocks must have occurred prior to, or

in greater amounts than, cementation o f the mudstones. Another

approach would be to consider the combined effects o f a larger

p a rtic le surface area and the presence o f a more soluble carbonate

in the muds. Recent carbonate muds are aragonitic which tends to

be more soluble than ca lcite . Murray and Lucia (1967) suggest

this solubility difference may be enough to cause dolomite select­

iv ity . In addition to the strong dolomitization of mudstone beds,

fine-grained matrix in wackestones and packstones is also dolo­

mitized, usually when the allochemical grains are not (Fig. 26).

Burrow-fi 11ings and geopetal muds are dolomitized as well (Fig.

27). Bioturbation may have aided dolomitization in two ways.

Infaunal organisms tend to increase the porosity o f the sediment

by th e ir a c tiv itie s and, the organic matter le f t behind is rich

in magnesium which could react with dolom itizing pore waters dur­

ing diagenesis, much like the dolomitization of algal mats

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 51

Fig. 26- Photomicrograph o f sample WU- 12 showing the preferential dolomitization of fine-grained matrix surrounding the mollusk fragment (x 11.2).

•*»*.?■*•.V

Fig. 27- Etched and stained slab (sample M-l) showing the preferen­ tia l dolom itization o f geopetal mud w ithin the rugose coral (A) and fine-grained burrow muds (B).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. described by Gebelein and Hoffman (1973). Dolomite which pre­ ferentially replaces organic-rich algal laminae in the intertidal facies of the Belfast Member has been previously mentioned.

Facies of the Brassfield which were deposited in low-energy, quiet regimes where abundant fine-grained sediments were deposited, are the most intensely dolomitized. This corresponds with the

Belfast Member, the lower massively bedded Brassfield and quiet water facies of the upper thinly bedded Brassfield (Fig. 28). In­ terparticle muds and burrow-fillings were preferentially dolomitiz­ ed in the coarser-textured, higher-energy environments of the thin bedded u n it, upper massive u n it and the upper th in ly bedded Brass­ fie ld . Organic a c tiv ity by infaunal organisms and blue-green algae aided this process by acting as additional sources of magnesium.

Another fabric selective aspect of Brassfield dolomitization involves the preferential replacement of fo s s il allochems that have high-magnesium hard parts. Dolomitization o f crinoid debris and mollusks is actually rather minor, but is worthwhile to note.

This type of dolomitization is most common in the higher-energy textures o f the wackestone ( I I ) , packstone ( I I I ) , and grainstone

(IV) facies where fo s s il grains are most abundant and dolomite is scarse. An association exists between dolomite and styolites and fractures in the Brassfield. Typically styolites are dolomitized

(Fig. 29). Alteration concentrated around these seams in relatively undolomitized rocks indicates that compaction and s ty o litiz a tio n occurred prior to dolomitization. The styolites acted as avenues

of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 53

Fig. 28- Photomicrograph of sample WU- 1 showing the fine-grained dolomite typical o f the Belfast Member,deposited in a low- energy environment. Note the dark algal laminae (x 3.2).

Fig. 29- Photomicrograph o f sample WU- 31 showing the preferential dolomitization of styolites (x 11.2).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 54 for dolomitizing fluids and consequently selective alteration

occurred along these accesses.

To summarize, the most volum etrically important amounts of

dolomite in the Brassfield Formation are associated with carbonate

muds. Whether the fine-grained sediment comprises an entire u n it

or facies, or on a petrographic scale is only a bit grain sheltered

sediment, preferential dolomitization is favored. Biological

activity, usually related to the muddy facies, enhances the pro­

cess.. Selective alteration of high-magnesium fossil grains and

dolomitization along styolites occurs to a lesser extent.

Petrography

Dolomite in the Brassfield Formation occurs as two dis­

tin ct crystal sizes ranging from 0.01-0.04mm and 0.06-0.4mm in

long diagonal size approximating the intermediate axis.

The finer-grained dolomite is restricted to the siltstones * of the Belfast Member of the basal Brassfield (Fig. 30). This

group o f crystals has an average diameter between 0.01mm and 0.04mm.

The crystals are anhedral, irregularly-meshed and usually only

relict original textures are discernable. The centers of the crys­

tals are cloudy, probably due to abundant inclusions.

The second group o f crystals is found throughout the Brass­

field section. These crystals are relatively large, 0.06-0.4mm,

well-ordered, euhedral rhombs (Fig. 31). The centers appear clear

and limpid and a few crystals seem to be zoned. These coarser

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 30- Photomicrograph o f sample WU- 5 showing the fine-grained anhedral dolomite characteristic of the basal Brass.field produced in hypersaline brines (x 32).

Fig. 31- Photomicrograph o f sample WU- 41 showing s o lita ry rhombs of euhedral dolomite replacing allochems surrounded by blocky calcite cement (x 32).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. crystals partially to strongly replace the original carbonate sed­

iment with original textures well-preserved. The crystals appear

as solitary rhombs (Fig. 31) or as loosely intergrown mosiacs

(Fig. 32) replacing calcitic cements, carbonate mud matrix or

fossils, sometimes selectively. For instance, grain she!ted muds

are sometimes preferentially replaced. ~

Staining with potassium ferricyanide reveals the abundance

of ferroan dolomite. The presence of ferroan dolomite is note­

worthy, because as Choquette (1971) suggests, it is characteristic

of la te r epigenetic dolom itization. The source o f iron fo r Brass­

field ferroan dolomites may be beds of iron-coated bioclasts with­

in the Brassfield and the overlying Crab Orchard Formation, or

iron-rich clays.

Cementation o f the original Brassfield sediments occurred

prior to dolomitization. Equant calcite is the most common in­

itia l pore fillin g cement and is indicative of freshwater phreatic diagenesis (Longman, 1980). Cement is d istrib u te d evenly around

the grains. Sometimes the grains are not in contact, suggesting

the former presence o f now recrystallized mud. The secondary

dolomite crystals partially or wholly replace portions of this

cement (Fig. 31).

Suggested Origin o f Dolomite

Evidence from depositional environments, petrography and

regional relationships of dolomitized rock in the Brassfield

suggests m ulti-stage dolom itization in southwestern Ohio.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fig. 32- Photomicrograph o f sample WU- 27 showing loosely in te r­ grown mosiac euhedral dolomite (x 11.2).

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 58

The dolomite limited to basal Brassfield (Belfast Member) is

the typically fine-grained, dirty dolomite produced by hypersaline

brines. The crystal form is anhedral, irregularly-meshed, and

m icritic. Dolomite replaces 100% of the original carbonate sediment.

Analyses o f depositional environments suggests an in it ia l

phase of supratidal conditions at the onset of Brassfield deposit­

ion. Small islands, probably lying just above normal high tide

level, existed on a very localized basis. Evidence of these supra­

tidal flats is not known to exist outside the study area. The pres­

ence o f gypsum casts suggests th is environment was suitable fo r the

formation of evaporites and was therefore hypersaline. Since the

gypsum casts are preserved, the environment must have also been

subject to protracted periods of drying. Dissolution of the gypsum

would lik e ly have occurred in a more humid setting.

The Brassfield supratidal environment must have been similar

to the classic sabhka o f the Persian Gulf and i t can be assumed

that dolom itization was a penecontemporaneous process not unlike

the modern sabkha (Fig. 33). Flood waters from storm tides in ­

filtrated the fla ts, as evaporation commenced the precipitation of

gypsum and anhydrite depleted the ground-water brine of Ca re­

sulting in an enrichment of Mg. The Ca/Mg ratio of the residual

brine would be >7 allowing the formation of dolomite (McKenzie,

et al_, 1980). As the hydrologic cycle continued, dolomitization

could proceed as "evaporative pumping" of the ground-water artesians

brought fresh solutions upward into the evaporitic zone. This

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 10 CJl Mg.> Mg.> 7 ). 1980 evaporation zone zone of dolomite formation water circulation patternwater table SABKHA lagoon storm recharge dolomitization. Diagram Illustrates the circulation pattern during times of evaporation and dolomite formation (modified from etMcKenzie al_., Fig. 33- Diagramatic representation of the sabkha or "evaporative pumping" model for

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 60

process was enhanced by blue-green mat-forming algae that pro­

vided an additional source of magnesium.

As transgression deepened the Brassfield seas the supratidal

environment required for sabkha-style dolomitization was replaced

by intertidal and fin a lly open marine subtidal environments.

Evaporitive dolomitization was halted as the bulk of the Brass­

fie ld rocks were deposited. No other hypersaline environments ex­

isted during deposition o f the Brassfield Formation or the over-

lying Crab Orchard Formation which could provide brines fo r fu r­

ther dolomitic alteration. Additionally, the most strongly dolo­

mitized portion of the Brassfield outcrop belt in east-central

Kentucky (Fig. 25), exhibits none of the restricted hypersaline

characteristics o f an evaporitic environment (Gordon, 1980). The

Brassfield paleoenvironments in.Kentucky were exclusively shallow

marine (Gordon, 1980). The intense dolom itization of these rocks

was due to their proximity to a structural high which was subareally

exposed following Silurian deposition.

Several authors have suggested that a major regression at the

onset o f the Devonian restricted marine deposition to a few basins

and along marginal mobile belts. Much of the continental interior

was exposed as a lowland for several m illion years (Dott and Batten,

1971). Evidence of this major Devonian unconformity exists in east-

central Kentucky where Silurian strata are truncated by Devonian

erosion. McDowell and Peterson (1980) suggest upwarping o f the

Cincinnati Arch, was initiated during the Early Silurian and be­

came fu lly developed before Middle Devonian time.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 61

The exposure of a relatively high area along the axis of the

Cincinnati Arch would have caught meteoric water and provided a

site for the formation of a paleoaquifer in the Brassfield lime­

stones. Underlying this fresh water lens, mixing with magnesium-

bearing marine pore water could produce a chemical environment

conducive for the formation of regionally extensive dolomite by

fresh-seawater mixing. Consequently, regional dolomitization of

the Brassfield rocks was probably a eogenetic secondary process

resulting from the admixture of marine interstitial waters and

meteoric water that occurred in a brackish mixing zone below an

exposed landmass (Fig. 34).

Dolomitization by fresh-seawater mixing has been suggested by

several authors. Badiozamani (1973) proposed the mixing zone model

for the dolomitization of Ordovician limestones in Wisconsin. Bad-

iozamani suggested tha t u p lif t o f the Wisconsin Arch provided a

structurally high, subareally exposed element that absorbed meteoric

water establishing a fresh water phreatic lens in a manner seemingly

analagous to the dolomitization of the Brassfield. Dolomitization

occurred where this fresh water lens intersected marine-saturated

carbonates (Fig. 34). The dolostone-limestone boundary followed

the lower margin o f the ground-wa te r lens. Where dolomi tic rocks

are present, mixing occurred, whereas limestones suggest mixing did

not occur. Any shifts in this boundary are due to sea-level fluct­

uations caused by transgressions and regressions, or tectonic flex­

ures. Dunham and Olson (1978, 1980) in th e ir studies of the mixed

water dolom itization o f the Hanson Creek Formation in Nevada point

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CTl rvj OCEAN I! n • • watir n I! a H v p• r * * p• r v H (modified et from Hanshaw al.., 1971). show generalizedshow flow paths. Dolomitization occurs in the brackish mixing zone Fig. 34- Diagramatic representation of the mixing zone process for dolomitization. Arrows

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 63 out the importance of paleogeographic control in the formation of

dolomite. Like the Brassfield, the Hanson Creek Formation includes

dolomitized and undolomitized rocks. Portions of the formation

which were dolomitized had access to meteoric-derived groundwater

with in te rstitia l sea water acting as the magnesium source. The

sections that remained limestone were d ista l to the area of fresh

water recharge. The degree o f dolom itization o f the Brassfield Formation

reflects the proximity of the original carbonate sediment to a

zone o f fresh-seawater mixing. I t has been mentioned that the

most strongly dolomitized rocks occur in east-central Kentucky,

coincident with the axis o f the Cincinnati Arch and the area of

fresh water recharge. The Kentucky do!ostones grade into limestones

in the northern portion of the outcrop belt (Fig. 25). This trend

reflects the position of the paleoaquifer and the zone of mixing.

Apparently the mixing zone did not extend far into Ohio or Indiana

since these Brassfield rocks remain basically unaltered. The

partial dolomitization of the rocks in the study area may indicate

the lower margin of the ground-water lens where effective dolomiti­

zation was limited.

Rock selectivity may have had a greater bearing on the extent

o f dolom itization in southwestern Ohio, where the dolomitizing

fluids were contaminated with excessive marine waters. Periodic

minor fluctuations in sea level may have aided the dolomitization

process along th is interface by lowering or extending the in flu ­

ence of the ground-water lens.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 64 Dolomite crystals o f the Brassfield Formation not associated '

with hypersaline brines, are euhedral, loosely intergrown rhombs

usually larger than 0.1mm. The dolomite is typically limpid and

is sometimes zoned. The significance o f lim pid dolomite produced

at slow crystallization rates in dilute solutions has been dis­

cussed by Folk and Land (1975). These well-ordered crystals are

the signatures of mixing zone dolomitization.

Trace elements such as strontium and sodium and stable isotope

composition also provide clues to the nature of dolomitizing waters.

Attention has been focused on the elements Sr and Na because Sr

is an important precusor of the original carbonate sediment and

Na, being the most abundant cation in marine water, should roughly

indicate the s a lin ity of the marine-derived solutions (Land, 1980).

Although laboratory analysis of the trace element and isotopic

geochemistry of the Brassfield dolomite was not possible in this

study, some general comments can be made. Sr and Na

substitute for Ca in carbonate minerals more readily in hypersaline

solutions or by rapid c ry s ta lliz a tio n . Consequently evaporitic

sabkha dolomite is enriched in Sr and Na relative to dolomite

formed from dilute fluids. However, this simple relationship is

complicated by several factors, including nonhomogeneous crysta lli­

zation rates, later neomorphism of the in itia l dolomite, and con­

tamination by new flu id s injected during burial (Land, 1980).

Oxygen isotope composition shows a sim ilar relationship to

that of Sr. £^80 values are higher in hypersaline dolomites be­

cause evaporation preferentially depletes theCaCOg sediment of

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. the lighter isotopes. Although dolomite formed in hypersaline

18 0 18 conditions is enriched in 0 the § 0 of dolomite depends jn 0 18 part on the (y 0 of the water, the temperature at which dolomite a 18 formed, and Q 0 o f the precusor sediment (Land, 1980). Interpretation of absolute values fo r trace elements or iso­

topes is d ifficu lt because of the variables that affect natural

systems. However prudent application o f the re la tive values of

these factors can be useful.in the systematic study of dolomite.

Timing of Dolomitization

Dolomitization o f the Brassfield Formation in southwestern

Ohio was a two-stage process. In itia l dolomitization of the basal

Brassfield supratidal islands was a penecontemporaneous event.

As the supratidal environment was replaced by shallow open marine

conditions as the Brassfield seas transgressed however, this phase

of dolomitization was halted. Large-scale dolomitization of the

formation took place sometime later, and hypersaline brine was

likely not the agent of dolomitization. Although evidence for the timing of major dolomitizing events

is often equivocal (Choquette and Steinen, 1980), it is possible

to bracket the timing of the event by the relationship of dolomite

to other diagenetic features, and in the case of the Brassfield,

to tectonic activity.

Equant calcite is the most common non-dolomitic Brassfield

cement. Large blocky crystals w ill f i l l the pore spaces between

grains. However, where dolomite is present, calcitic cement is

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 66 replaced by single euhedral, or .mosaics of dolomite crystals.

Dolomite formation is cle a rly secondary to c a lc ite cementation

(Fig. 31).

Apparently the Brassfield sediments underwent physical com­

paction which produced styolites before dolomitization, as seen by

the preferential dolomitization along styolites and fractures (Fig.

29). The styolites acted as conduits for dolomitizing fluids

which formed crystals and replaced the original carbonate.

S ilicification of the original carbonate sediment also occurred

prior to dolomitization. Preservation of undolomitized high mag­

nesium b io cla stic debris in chert nodules precludes dolom itization

of the original sediment before silicification since altered bio­

clasts occur in the surrounding dolomitized sediment. The s ilic i-

fie d sediments preserve the original textures sometimes obscurred

by later dolomitization.

It appears that regional dolomitization of the Brassfield

Formation occurred post-depositionally a fte r c a lc ite cementation,

compaction and s ilic ific a tio n of the carbonate sediment. The pro­

posed mixing zone model for Brassfield dolomitization is based on

the existance of a subareally exposed landmass that contained

fresh water in a paleoaquifer available to react with marine pore

waters. It has been suggested that this landmass existed along the

axis of the Cincinnati Arch in east-central Kentucky, and that sub­

areal exposure, resulting in a major unconformity, was developed

before Middle Devonian time (McDowell and Peterson, 1980). Sedi­

mentation resumed by the Upper Devonian resulting in the deposition

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. of the . Therefore, dolomitization of the Brassfield

which was controlled by the position of the paleoaquifer in the

landmass along the Cincinnati Arch must have occurred sometime

within the Middle Silurian and Upper Devonian hiatus represented

by the regional unconformity. Dolomitization by the mixing zone

process can only take place at depths shallow enough to be influenc

ed by a fresh groundwater lens. This constraint coupled with the

spatial trend in dolomitic alteration related the proximity of

Brassfield sediments to the paleoaquifer suggests dolomitization

was associated with flexure of the Cincinnati arch probably at the

onset o f the Devonian.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from depositional environments, petrography and

regional relationships of doloraitized and undolomitized rock in

the Brassfield Formation suggests two stages dolom itization in

Adams County, Ohio. In itia l dolom itization o f the basal Brass­ fie ld took place penecontemporaneously on supratidal islands that

existed in what is now southwestern Ohio. Dolomitization probably

occurred in a manner analagous to tha t which occurs in the modern

sabkha environment of the Persian Gulf. Dolomite crystals in the

basal Brassfield are small, 0.01-0.04mm, anhedral, dirty rhombs

typical of hypersaline environments.

Since the Brassfield rocks are representative of an Early

Silurian transgression the supratidal environment was replaced by

shallow open marine conditions. Regional dolom itization of the

Brassfield Formation can best be explained as a la te r epigenetic

event that occurred in a brackish mixing zone of fresh and sea

waters associated with the creation of a landmass due to upwarping

of the Cincinnati Arch at the close of the Silurian. The dolomite

crystals formed by this process are large (up to 0.4mm), euhedral,

limpid rhombs characteristic of dilute dolomitizing solutions.

Intensity of dolomitization is directly related to the proximity of

the original carbonate to the source of dolomitizing fluids in the

mixing zone.

68

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, J.E ., & Rhodes, M.L. Dolomitization by Seepage Refluxion. American Association o f Petroleum Geologists B u lle tin , 1960, 45, 1712-1920. Badiozamani, K. The Dorag dolom itization model: application to the Middle Ordovician of Wisconsin. Journal o f Sedimentary Petrology, 1973, 43, 965-984.

Berry, W.B.,& Boucot, A.J. Correlation of the North American Silurian rocks (Special Paper No. 102). New York: Geological Society of America, 1970.

Berry, W.B., & Boucot, A.J. Glacio-eustatic control of Late Ordovician-Early Silurian platform sedimentation and fauna! changes. Geological Society o f America B u lle tin , 1973, 84, 275-284.

Catalov, G.A. An attempt at energy index analysis of the Upper • Anisian, Ladinian and Carnian carbonate rocks in the Tetevan . anticlinorium . Sedimentary Geology, 1972, JJ, 159-175.

Choquette, P.W. Late ferroan dolomite cement, Mississippian carbonates, Illin o is Basin, U.S.A. In O.P. Bricker (Ed.), Carbonate Cements. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1971.

Choquette, P.W., & Steinen, R.P. Mississippian non-supratidal dolomite, Ste. Genevieve Limestone, Illin o is Basin: evidence for mixed-water dolomitization. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham, and R.L. Ethinqton (Eds.), Concepts and models o f dolom iti­ zation (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1980.

Dickson, U.A.D. A modified staining technique fo r carbonates in th in section. Nature,, 1965, 205, 587.

Dott, R.H. Jr., & Batten, R.L. Evolution of the earth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.

Dunham, R.J. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. Journal o f Sedimentary Petrology, 1962, 32, 108-121.

Dunham, J.B.,& Olson, E.R. Diagenetic dolomite formation related to Paleozoic paleogeography of the Cordilleran miogeocline in Nevada. Geology, 1978, 556-559.

69

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 70 Dunham, J.B., & Olson, E.R. Shallow subsurface dolomitization of sub tida lly deposited carbonate sediments in the Hanson Creek Formation (Ordovician-Silurian) of central Nevada. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington ( Eds. ) , Concepts and models of dolomitization (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society o f Economic Paleontologists and Mineralo­ g is ts , 1980.

Engle, A.E., Clayton, R.N., & Epstein, S. Variations in isotopic composition of oxygen and carbon in Leadvilie limestones (Miss­ issippian, Colorado) and in its hydrothermal and metamorphic phases. Journal of Geology, 1958, 66_, 364-393.

Foerste, A.F. The Clinton Group of Ohio. Dennison University Science Laboratory B u lle tin , 1885, 1_, 63-120.

Foerste, A.F. Middle Silurian of Ohio and Indiana. Cincinnati Society o f Natural H istory, 1896, T_8, 161-200.

Foerste, A.F. The Ordovician-Silurian contact in the Ripley Island area of southern Indiana, with notes on the age of the Cincinnati geanticline. American Journal o f Science Series 4, 1904, 18, 321-342.

Foerste, A.F. The S ilu ria n , Devonian and Irvine Formations in east-central Kentucky. Kentucky Geological Survey B u lle tin , 1906, 7, 1-369.

Folk, R.L. Spectral subdivision of limestone types. In W.E. Ham (Ed.), Classification of carbonate rocks - a symposium (Memoir No. 1). Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1962.

Folk, R.L., & Land, L.S. Mg/Ca ratio and salinity: two controls over the crystallization of dolomite. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 1975, 59, 60-68.

Friedman, G.M. Dolomite is an evaporite mineral: evidence from the rock record and from sea-marginal ponds of the Red Sea. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington ( Eds. V. Con­ cepts and models of dolomitization (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1980.

Gaines, A.M. Dolomitization kinetics: recent experimental studies. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington (Eds.), Concepts and models of dolomitization (Special Publication. No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma! Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1980.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Gebelein, C. & Hoffman, P. Algal origin of dolomite laminations in stro m a to litic limestone. Journal of Sedimentary Petroloqy, 1973, 43, 603-613.

Geblein, C., Steinen, R.P., Garrett, P., Hoffman, E.J., Queen, J .'M ., & Plummer, L.N. Subsurface dolom itization beneath the tidal flats of central west Andros Island, Bahamas. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington (Eds.), Concepts and models of dolomitization (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society o f Economic Paleontologists and Mineralo­ g is ts , 1980.

Goodel!, H.G., & Garman, R.K. Carbonate geochemistry of superior deep te st w e ll, Andros Island, Bahamas. American Association o f Petroleum Geologists B u lle tin , 1969, 53, 513-536.

Gordon, L.A. Stratigraphy and Paleoecology of the Brassfield Formation (Llandoverian) in east-central Kentucky. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Kentucky, 1980.

Gray, J ., & Boucot, A.M. Palynological evidence bearing on the Ordovician-Si1urian paraconformity in Ohio. Geological Society o f America B u lle tin , 1972, 83, 1299-1314.

Hanshaw, B.D., Back, W., & Deike, R.G. A geochemical hypothesis for dolomitization by groundwater. Economic Geologist, 1971, 66, 710-724.

Harrison, W.B. Personal communication, June 12, 1979.

Hsii, K .J., & Siegenthaler, C. Preliminary experiments and hydro- dynamic movement induced by evaporation and th e ir bearing on the dolomite problem. Sedimentology, 1969, 1J2, 11-25.

Illin g , L.V., Wells, A.J., & Taylor, J.C. Penecontemporaneous dolomite in the Persian Gulf. In L.C. Pray and R.C. Murray (Eds.), Polomitization and limestone diagenesis - a. symposium (Special Publication No. 12). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1965. Irvin g , E. Paleopoles and paleolatitudes o f North America and speculations about displaced terrains. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 1979, 26, 669-694.

James, N.P. Facies models 10., shallowing upward sequences in carbonates. In R.G. Walker (Ed.), Facies models (Reprint Series 1). Toronto: Geological Association of Canada, 1979.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 72 Kinsman, D.J. Modes of formations, sedimentary associations, and diagnostic features of shallow-water and supratidal evaporites. American Association o f Petroleum Geologists B u lle tin , 1969, 53, 830-840.

Land, L.S. Contemporaneous dolomitization of Middle Pleistocene reefs by meteoric water, North Jamaica. B u lle tin of Marine Science, 1973a, 23, 64-92.

Land, L.S. The isotopic and trace element geochemistry o f dolo­ mite: the state of the art. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington (Eds.), Concepts and models of dolomitization (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1980.

Land, L.S,, & Epstein, S. Late Pleistocene diagenesis and dolo­ m itiza tion , North Jamaica. Sedimentology, 1970, 14, 187-200.

Laporte, L.F. Carbonate deposition near mean sea level and re­ sultant facies mosiac: Manlius Formation (Lower Devonian) o f New York state. American Association o f Petroleum Geologists B u lle tin , 1967, 51_, 73-101.

Longman, M.W. Carbonate diagenetic textures from nearsurface diagenetic environments. American Association of Petroleum Geologists B u lle tin , 1980, 64, 461-487.

Mattes, B.W., & Mountjoy, E.W. Burial dolomitization of the Upper Devonian Miette Buildup, Jasper National Park, Alberta. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington (Eds.), Concepts and models of dolomitization (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society o f Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1980.

McDowell, R.C., & Peterson, W.L. Stratigraphy of the Silurian outcrop belts in Kentucky: Evidence of gentle tectonism. Geological Society o f America Abstracts with Programs South­ eastern Section (Annual Meeting) , Birmingham, Alabama, 1980, 184. (Abstract) McKenzie, J .A ., Hsu, K .J., & Schneider, J.F. Movement o f sub­ surface waters under the Sabkha, Abu Dhabi, UAE, and its re la t­ ion to evaporite dolomite genesis. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington (Eds.), Concepts and models o f dolom itization (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1980.

McKerrow, W.S. Ordovician and S ilurian changes in sea le ve l. Journal o f the Geological Society, 1979, 136. 137-143.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Muir, M., Lock, D., & von der Borch, C. The Coorong model fo r penecontemporaneous dolomite formation in the Middle Proterozoic McArthur Group, Northern T erritory, A ustralia. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington (Eds.), Concepts and models of dolomitization (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1980.

Murray, E.J. Trace fossils of the Brassfield Formation, Lower Silurian, in south-central Ohio and north-central Kentucky. UnpublishedTMaster's thesis, Western Michigan University, 1975.

Murray, R.C., & Lucia, F.J. Cause and control of dolomite dis­ tribution by rock selectivity. Geological Society of America B u lle tin , 1967, 78, 21-36. O'Donnell, E. The lith ostratigraphy o f the Brassfield Formation ( Lower S iluria n) in the Cincinnati Arch area. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 1967.

Orton, E. F irs t annual report o f the geological Survey of Ohio. 1890. Peck, J.H. Geologic map of the Tollesboro Quadrangle, Lewis and Fleming Counties, Kentucky. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey, 1967.

Plumley, W.J., Risley, G.A., Graves, R.W., & Kaley, M.E. Energy Index for limestone interpretation and classification. In W.E. Ham (Ed.), Classification of carbonate rocks - a symposium (Memoir No. 1). Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1962.

Powers, R.W. Arabian Upper carbonate reservoir rocks. In W.E. Ham (Ed.), Classification of carbonate rocks - a. symposium (Memoir No. l ) . Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Assoc­ iation of Petroleum Geologists, 1962. Rexroad, C.B Stratigraphy and conodont paleontology of the Brass­ field (Silurian) of the Cincinnati Arch area. Indiana Geolog­ ica l Survey B u lle tin , 1967, 36, 1-64. Rexroad, C.B., Branson, E.R., Smith, M.D., Summerson, D., & Boucot, A.J. The S iluria n Formations of east-central Kentucky and adjacent Ohio. Geological Survey of Kentucky Series X, 1965, 2, 1-34. Runnells, D.D. Diagenesis, chemical sediments, and the mixing of natural waters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1969, 39, 1188-1201.

permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission 74 Sears, S.O., & Lucia, F.J. Dolomitization o f Northern Michigan reefs by brine refluxion and freshwater/seawater mixing. In D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham and R.L. Ethington (Eds.), Concepts and models of dolomitization (Special Publication No. 28). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Min­ eralogists, 1980. Sheehan, P.M. Brachiopod synecology in a time o f c ris is . Paleo­ biology, 1975, T_* 205* Shinn, E.A., Ginsberg, R.N., & Lloyd, R.M. Recent supratidal dolomite from Andros Island, Bahamas. In L.C. Pray and R.C. Murray (Eds.), Dolomitization and limestone diagenesis-a symposium (Special Publication No. 12). Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1965.

von der Borch, C.C. The distribution and preliminary geochemistry o f modern carbonate sediments of the Coorong area, South Aus­ tr a lia . Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1965, 29, 781-799.

Weir, G.W., & Peck, J.H. Lithofacies of Upper Ordovician rocks exposed between Maysvilie and Stanford, Kentucky, 162-168. Geological Survey research 1968 (U.S. Geological Survey Pro­ fessional Paper 60(M)n New York: U.S. Geological Survey, 1968. Wilson, J.L. Carbonate facies in geologic history. New York: Springer Verlag, 1975. Ziegler, A.M. S iluria n marine communities and th e ir environ­ mental significance. Nature, 1965, 207, 270-272.

Z iegler, A.M., & Boucot, A.J. North American S ilurian animal communities. In W.B. Berry & A.J. Boucot (Eds.), Correlation of North American Silurian rocks (Special Paper No. 102). New York: Geological Society of America, 1970.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.