DOCSLIB.ORG

RI 146, Subsurface Geology of the Serpent Mound Disturbance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RI 146, Subsurface Geology of the Serpent Mound Disturbance STATE OF OHIO Bob Taft, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Samuel W. Speck, Director DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas M. Berg, Chief Baranoski, Schumacher, Watts, Carlton, and El-Saiti—SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF THE SERPENT MOUND DISTURBANCE, THE SERPENT OF GEOLOGY Carlton, and El-Saiti—SUBSURFACE Watts, Baranoski, Schumacher, ADAMS, HIGHLAND, AND PIKE COUNTIES, OHIO—Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 146 of Investigations OHIO—Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report AND PIKE COUNTIES, HIGHLAND, ADAMS, Report of Investigations No. 146 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF THE SERPENT MOUND DISTURBANCE, ADAMS, HIGHLAND, AND PIKE COUNTIES, OHIO by Mark T. Baranoski, Gregory A. Schumacher, Doyle R. Watts, Richard W. Carlton, and Belgasem M. El-Saiti Columbus 2003 DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 4383 FOUNTAIN SQUARE DRIVE COLUMBUS, OHIO 43224-1362 (614) 265-6576 (614) 447-1918 (FAX) e-mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: http://www.ohiodnr.com/geosurvey/ OHIO GEOLOGY ADVISORY COUNCIL Ms. F. Lynn Kantner, representing At-Large Citizens Mr. David A. Wilder, representing Coal Mr. C. Robert Lennertz, representing Environmental Geology Dr. Mark R. Boardman, representing Higher Education Dr. Robert W. Ritzi, Jr., representing Hydrogeology Mr. Garry L. Getz, representing Industrial Minerals Mr. William M. Rike, representing Oil and Gas SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATION (614) 265-6988 Thomas M. Berg, MS, State Geologist and Division Chief Dennis N. Hull, MS, Assistant State Geologist and Assistant Division Chief Betty R. Lewis, Fiscal Offi cer James M. Patterson, Account Clerk Sharon L. Stone, AD, Administrative Assistant GEOLOGIC MAPPING GROUP (614) 265-6473 COAL & INDUSTRIAL MINERALS GROUP (614) 265-6594 Edward Mac Swinford, MS, Geologist Supervisor Douglas L. Crowell, MS, Geologist Supervisor Richard R. Pavey, MS, Surfi cial Mapping Administrator Charles E. Banks, MS, Geologist/GIS Specialist C. Scott Brockman, MS, Geologist Ronald G. Rea, MS, Geologist and Sample Repository Man- Glenn E. Larsen, MS, Geologist ager Gregory A. Schumacher, MS, Geologist Mark E. Wolfe, BS, Geologist Douglas L. Shrake, MS, Geologist Kim E. Vorbau, BS, Geologist PETROLEUM GEOLOGY GROUP (614) 265-6598 LAKE ERIE GEOLOGY GROUP (419) 626-4296, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, MS, Geologist Supervisor (419) 626-8767 (FAX) Mark T. Baranoski, MS, Geologist James McDonald, MS, Geologist Constance J. Livchak, MS, Geologist Supervisor Ronald A. Riley, MS, Geologist Jonathan A. Fuller, MS, Geologist Ernie R. Slucher, MS, Geologist Donald E. Guy, Jr., MS, Geologist Joseph G. Wells, MS, Database Administrator CARTOGRAPHY & EDITING GROUP (614) 265-6593 GEOLOGIC RECORDS CENTER (614) 265-6585 Edward V. Kuehnle, BA, Cartographer Supervisor Garry E. Yates, NZCS, Supervisor Donovan M. Powers, BA, GIMS Specialist Madge R. Fitak, BS, Offi ce Assistant Lisa Van Doren, BA, Electronic Designer Sharon E. Lundy, Offi ce Assistant An Equal Opportunity Employer - M/F/H recycled paper vi STATE OF OHIO Bob Taft, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Samuel W. Speck, Director DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas M. Berg, Chief Report of Investigations No. 146 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF THE SERPENT MOUND DISTURBANCE, ADAMS, HIGHLAND, AND PIKE COUNTIES, OHIO by Mark T. Baranoski Ohio Division of Geological Survey Gregory A. Schumacher Ohio Division of Geological Survey Doyle R. Watts Wright State University (formerly at University of Glasgow) Richard W. Carlton Ohio Division of Geological Survey (now retired) and Belgasem M. El-Saiti Gar Younis University, Bengazi, Libya (formerly at University of Glasgow) Columbus 2003 i Front cover: Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite false-color Back cover: Aerial view of the Serpent Mound effi gy, Adams image taken in September 1994 showing the circular Serpent County, Ohio. Photo by Tom Root. Reproduced with the permis- Mound disturbance and the Plum Run Quarry Fault adjacent to sion of the Ohio Historical Society. the western limit of the Appalachian Plateaus in southern Ohio (see interpretation opposite). Image area covers approximately 888 square km (343 square miles). Image spectral bands are bands 2, 3, and 4, which determine relative intensities of blue, green, and red, respectively. The bands range in wavelength between 0.52 and 0.60 micrometers, 0.63 and 0.69 micrometers, and 0.76 and 0.90 micrometers, respectively. Reddish-orange hues generally indicate deciduous tree cover on rugged topographic relief. Light-blue to purple hues indicate highly refl ective sur- faces such as roads, manmade features, and water bodies. Image processing provided by Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Real Estate and Land Management. ii Western edge of the Appalachian Plateaus escarpment Boundary fault zone of the Serpent Mound disturbance Plum Run Quarry Fault INTERPRETATION OF FRONT-COVER IMAGE iii CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................ 3 Previous work ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Regional geologic setting ...................................................................................................................... 6 Precambrian geology ......................................................................................................................... 6 Paleozoic folding and faulting ........................................................................................................... 6 Paleozoic stratigraphy ....................................................................................................................... 9 Core and oil and gas well data ............................................................................................................. 11 Core examination procedures and terminology ............................................................................... 11 Data beyond boundary of the Serpent Mound disturbance ............................................................ 12 Data within the boundary of the Serpent Mound disturbance ....................................................... 13 Megascopic description of core DGS 3274 .................................................................................... 16 Petrography of core DGS 3274 ...................................................................................................... 20 Geochemistry of core DGS 3274 .................................................................................................... 21 Megascopic description of core DGS 3275 .................................................................................... 21 Geophysical data ................................................................................................................................... 24 Seismic refl ection profi les and reprocessing .................................................................................... 24 Gravity data ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Magnetic data .................................................................................................................................... 31 Paleomagnetic data ........................................................................................................................... 33 Origin of the Serpent Mound disturbance ........................................................................................... 34 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................. 35 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................ 37 References cited .................................................................................................................................... 40 Appendix A.—Glossary ......................................................................................................................... 46 Appendix B.—Generalized descriptions of lithostratigraphic units .................................................. 48 Appendix C.—Checklist used in describing cores ............................................................................... 54 Appendix D.—Selected megascopic descriptions of thin sections and samples from cores DGS 3274 and DGS 3275 .................................................................................................................................... 56 FIGURES 1. Location of structural zones of the Serpent Mound disturbance ................................................. 2 2. Comparison between the geologic maps of Foerste and Lamborn and Bownocker .................... 7 3. Location of selected basement features in Ohio ............................................................................ 8 4. Regional structural features .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paleoproterozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Trans-North China Orogen: Toward a Comprehensive Model
    Paleoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the Trans-North China Orogen: toward a comprehensive model. Pierre Trap, Michel Faure, Wei Lin, Nicole Le Breton, Patrick Monié To cite this version: Pierre Trap, Michel Faure, Wei Lin, Nicole Le Breton, Patrick Monié. Paleoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the Trans-North China Orogen: toward a comprehensive model.. Precambrian Research, Elsevier, 2012, 222-223, pp.191-211. 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.09.008. insu-00628119 HAL Id: insu-00628119 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00628119 Submitted on 2 Jan 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Paleoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the Trans-North China Orogen: Toward a comprehensive model Pierre Trapa, Michel Faureb, Wei Linc, Nicole Le Bretonb, Patrick Moniéd UMR-CNRS 6249 Chrono-Environnement, Université de Franche-Comté, 16 route de Gray a 25030 Besançon Cedex, France Institut des Sciences de la Terre d‟Orléans, CNRS, Université d‟Orléans (UMR 6113), b 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, c Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China Géosciences Montpellier, UMR CNRS 5243, Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier d Cedex 5, France Abstract In this contribution we present a reconstruction of the overall lithotectonic architecture, from inner zones to external ones, of the Paleoproterozoic Trans-North China Orogen, within the North China Craton.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Syncline Mine Project Record of Decision
    United States Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Caribou-Targhee National Forest Final Record of Decision Dairy Syncline Mine Project, Caribou County, Idaho April 2020 Forest Service – Caribou-Targhee National Forest – April 2020 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Surfaces
    Chapter 4 PLANETARY SURFACES 4.1 The Absence of Bedrock A striking and obvious observation is that at full Moon, the lunar surface is bright from limb to limb, with only limited darkening toward the edges. Since this effect is not consistent with the intensity of light reflected from a smooth sphere, pre-Apollo observers concluded that the upper surface was porous on a centimeter scale and had the properties of dust. The thickness of the dust layer was a critical question for landing on the surface. The general view was that a layer a few meters thick of rubble and dust from the meteorite bombardment covered the surface. Alternative views called for kilometer thicknesses of fine dust, filling the maria. The unmanned missions, notably Surveyor, resolved questions about the nature and bearing strength of the surface. However, a somewhat surprising feature of the lunar surface was the completeness of the mantle or blanket of debris. Bedrock exposures are extremely rare, the occurrence in the wall of Hadley Rille (Fig. 6.6) being the only one which was observed closely during the Apollo missions. Fragments of rock excavated during meteorite impact are, of course, common, and provided both samples and evidence of co,mpetent rock layers at shallow levels in the mare basins. Freshly exposed surface material (e.g., bright rays from craters such as Tycho) darken with time due mainly to the production of glass during micro- meteorite impacts. Since some magnetic anomalies correlate with unusually bright regions, the solar wind bombardment (which is strongly deflected by the magnetic anomalies) may also be responsible for darkening the surface [I].
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio
    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present.
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Hypotheses for the Origin of Steep Slope of Lunar Size-Frequency Distribution for Small Craters
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Earth Planets Space, 55, 39–51, 2003 Testing hypotheses for the origin of steep slope of lunar size-frequency distribution for small craters Noriyuki Namiki1 and Chikatoshi Honda2 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyushu University, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan 2The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Yoshinodai 3-1-1, Sagamihara 229-8510, Japan (Received June 13, 2001; Revised June 24, 2002; Accepted January 6, 2003) The crater size-frequency distribution of lunar maria is characterized by the change in slope of the population between 0.3 and 4 km in crater diameter. The origin of the steep segment in the distribution is not well understood. Nonetheless, craters smaller than a few km in diameter are widely used to estimate the crater retention age for areas so small that the number of larger craters is statistically insufficient. Future missions to the moon, which will obtain high resolution images, will provide a new, large data set of small craters. Thus it is important to review current hypotheses for their distributions before future missions are launched. We examine previous and new arguments and data bearing on the admixture of endogenic and secondary craters, horizontal heterogeneity of the substratum, and the size-frequency distribution of the primary production function. The endogenic crater and heterogeneous substratum hypotheses are seen to have little evidence in their favor, and can be eliminated. The primary production hypothesis fails to explain a wide variation of the size-frequency distribution of Apollo panoramic photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in The
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-K Chapter K Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER, ANITA G. HARRIS, and JOHN E. REPETSKI Stratigraphic framework of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence in part of the central Appalachian basin and the structure of underlying block-faulted basement rocks U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ryder, Robert T. Stratigraphic framework of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in the central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through southwestern and south-central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia / by Robert T. Ryder, Anita C. Harris, and John E. Repetski. p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Appalachian Basin ; ch. K) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839-K) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1839-K 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cambrian.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee
    Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee By ROBERT C. MILICI and HELMUTH WEDOW, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Milici, Robert C 1931- Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and parts of the adjacent valley and ridge, Tennessee. (Geological Survey professional paper; 996) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:996 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Ordovician. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic--Silurian. 3. Geology--Tennessee--Sequatchie Valley. 4. Geology--Tennessee--Chattanooga region. I. Wedow, Helmuth, 1917- joint author. II: Title. Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley .... III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper; 996. QE660.M54 551.7'310976877 76-608170 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03002·1 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Compositional and Mineralogical Characteristics of Archimedes Crater Region Using Chandrayaan – 1 M3 Data
    50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2132) 1040.pdf COMPOSITIONAL AND MINERALOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ARCHIMEDES CRATER REGION USING CHANDRAYAAN – 1 M3 DATA. P. R. Kumaresan1 and J. Saravanavel2, 1Research Scholar, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Remote Sensing, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli-23, Tamil Nadu, India, email: [email protected], [email protected] Introduction: The Earth’s natural satellite the tometry corrected reflectance data captured during the moon is nearest celestial body appears brightest object OP1B optical period. in our night sky. Moon surfaces are composed of dark and light areas. The dark areas are called Maria which is made up of basaltic terrain and light areas are high- lands mostly made up of Anorthositic rocks. The moon surface is littered with craters, which are formed when meteors hit its surface. To understand the evolution, geological process of the moon it is important to study the surface composition and minerals present in crustal surface. In this regard, in our study, we have attempted to map the minerals and surface composition of Archi- medes crater region. Study area: Archimedes crater is a large impact crater located on the eastern edges of the Mare Imbri- um of near side moon (29.7° N, 4.0° W). The diameter of the crater is 83 km with smooth floor flooded (1) with mare basalt and lack of a central peak. The rim (2) has a significant outer rampart brightened with ejecta (3) and the some portion of a terraced inner wall. Ar- chimedes Crater is named for the Greek mathematician Archimedes, who made many mathematical discoveries in the 200 B.C [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch
    International Geoscience Programme Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett – Kyle R. Hartshorn – Allison L. Young – Cameron E. Schwalbach – Alycia L. Stigall International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - 2018 - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Kyle R. Hartshorn Dry Dredgers, 6473 Jayfield Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, USA ([email protected]) Allison L. Young Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Cameron E. Schwalbach 1099 Clough Pike, Batavia, OH 45103, USA ([email protected]) Alycia L. Stigall Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Lab, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our thanks to the many colleagues and students who have aided us in our field work, discussions, and publications, including Chris Aucoin, Ben Dattilo, Brad Deline, Rebecca Freeman, Steve Holland, T.J. Malgieri, Pat McLaughlin, Charles Mitchell, Tim Paton, Alex Ries, Tom Schramm, and James Thomka. No less gratitude goes to the many local collectors, amateurs in name only: Jack Kallmeyer, Tom Bantel, Don Bissett, Dan Cooper, Stephen Felton, Ron Fine, Rich Fuchs, Bill Heimbrock, Jerry Rush, and dozens of other Dry Dredgers. We are also grateful to David Meyer and Arnie Miller for insightful discussions of the Cincinnatian, and to Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee Meteorite Impact Sites and Changing Perspectives on Impact Cratering
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND THE TENNESSEE METEORITE IMPACT SITES AND CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT CRATERING A dissertation submitted by Janaruth Harling Ford B.A. Cum Laude (Vanderbilt University), M. Astron. (University of Western Sydney) For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 ABSTRACT Terrestrial impact structures offer astronomers and geologists opportunities to study the impact cratering process. Tennessee has four structures of interest. Information gained over the last century and a half concerning these sites is scattered throughout astronomical, geological and other specialized scientific journals, books, and literature, some of which are elusive. Gathering and compiling this widely- spread information into one historical document benefits the scientific community in general. The Wells Creek Structure is a proven impact site, and has been referred to as the ‘syntype’ cryptoexplosion structure for the United State. It was the first impact structure in the United States in which shatter cones were identified and was probably the subject of the first detailed geological report on a cryptoexplosive structure in the United States. The Wells Creek Structure displays bilateral symmetry, and three smaller ‘craters’ lie to the north of the main Wells Creek structure along its axis of symmetry. The question remains as to whether or not these structures have a common origin with the Wells Creek structure. The Flynn Creek Structure, another proven impact site, was first mentioned as a site of disturbance in Safford’s 1869 report on the geology of Tennessee. It has been noted as the terrestrial feature that bears the closest resemblance to a typical lunar crater, even though it is the probable result of a shallow marine impact.
    [Show full text]