DOCSLIB.ORG

Ohio Fossils

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ohio Fossils ~ns3 STA TE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES · DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 54 OHIO f OSSILS COLUMBUS NINTH PRINTING 1970 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief BULLETIN 54 OHIO FOSSILS BY AURELE LA ROCQUE AND MILDRED FISHER MARPLE COLUMBUS 1955 NINTH PRINTING 1970 FRONTISPIECE. Phacops rana milleri, an almost complete specimen from the Silica formation near Sylvania, Ohio. X 2. 75 (See page 92). CONTENTS Preface Page Chapter 1. Introduction . 1 What fossils are . 1 Where fossils are found 1 Uses of fossils . 1 How fossils are found 1 Where and how to collect 2 Kinds of fossil preservation 2 How fossils are named . 3 Classification and identification 4 Use of keys 4 Technical terms . 5 Name changes . 5 Cleaning and preparation 5 Cataloguing . 6 Basic references 6 Chapter 2. The story of Ohio's rocks 8 General . 8 Classification of Ohio's rocks . 13 Pre-Cambrian time: the beginning 13 Cambrian time: the age of trilobites 14 Ordovician time: the age of bryozoan reefs 14 Silurian time: the rise of the corals . 17 Devonian time: the rise of the fishes . 19 Mississippian time: the great sandy deltas 21 Pennsylvanian time: the coal forests 23 Permian time: the end of the seas in Ohio 26 The great gap in the record 26 Pleistocene time: the glaciers 26 Chapter 3. The main kinds of fossils 29 The Plant Kingdom . 29 General ..... 29 Phylum Thallophyta 29 Phylum Bryophyta 30 Phylum Pteridophyta 30 Phylum Arthrophyta 31 Phylum Lepidophyta 31 Phylum Pteridospermophyta 31 Phylum Cycadophyta 31 Phylum Coniferophyta 32 Phylum Angiospermophyta 32 The Animal Kingdom 32 General .... 32 Phylum Protozoa 33 Phylum Porifera 34 Phylum Coelenterata 34 iii Page Phylum Platyhelminthes 35 Phylum Nemathelminthes 35 Phylum Trochelminthes 36 Phylum Bryozoa 36 Phylum Brachiopoda 36 Phylum Mollusca . 36 Phylum Annelida 38 Phylum Onychophora 38 Phylum Arthropoda 39 Phylum E chinoderma 40 Phylum Chordata . 41 Chapter 4. Ordovician fossils 44 Collecting localities 44 The commoner fossils 45 Books for further study 55 Chapter 5. Silurian fossils 56 Collecting localities 56 The commoner fossils 57 Books for further study 73 Chapter 6. Devonian fossils 74 Collecting localities 74 The commoner fossils 74 Books for further study 94 Chapter 7. Mississippian fossils 96 Collecting localities 96 The commoner fossils 97 Books for further study 104 Chapter 8. Pennsylvanian fossils 105 Collecting localities 105 The commoner fossils 105 Books for further study 119 Chapter 9. Pe rm ian fossils 120 Collecting localities 120 The commoner fossils 120 Books for further study 121 Chapter 10. Pleistocene fossils 122 Collecting localities 122 The commoner fossils 122 Books for further study 136 References cited 137 Index 145 PREFACE Every year hundreds of people pick up fossils in Ohio and become interested in them. If their interest is more than casual, they want a book that will tell them something about their finds. Books about fossils are many, but most of them are written in disappointingly technical language. That is why we have tried to write one that would be understood by the non-profes- sional. We hope this book will provide an introduction to the subject and answer the many questions usually asked about fossils. It is not meant to be a complete account of Ohio pale- ontology; it deals only with the commoner species, the ones that anybody is likely to pick up in Ohio. We hope it will at least open the door to the subject of paleontology, the study of fossils, a fascinating hobby that can be enjoyed without extensive training or equipment. To simplify searching, technical terms not usually found in dictionaries are explained in the text and listed in the index. The "you" for whom this book is written and to whom it is addressed includes all Ohioans interested in fossils. May you have as much fun reading and using it as we had writing it. During the preparation of this bulletin we have had much help and encouragement which it is a pleasure to acknowledge. Dr. J. E. Carmar. allowed us to draw on his thorough and detailed knowledge of Ohio stratigraphy and paleontology; his kindly and searching criticism of the manuscript is much appreciated. Mr. R. E. Lamborn and Miss Pauline Smyth of the Ohio Division of Geological Survey read parts of the manuscript and contributed information on topics with which they are particularly familiar. Mr. W. C. Brown, also of the Survey, gave us much good advice on many points important to the non-geologist. Dr. J. M. Schopf, of the United States Geological Survey, read the part of the text dealing with fossil plants and his advice on that subject is gratefully acknowledged. Mr. R. S. Bowman gave us much information on Silurian fossils. Dr. E. S. Thomas, Curator of Natural History at the Ohio State Museum, gave us his impressions of the text from the standpoint of a naturalist. Our colleagues in the department of geology at the Ohio State University, Drs. C. A. Lamey, J. O. Fuller, R. P. Goldthwait, H. J. Pincus, M. P. Weiss, and S. E. White, have read the manuscript in its final stages and have contributed useful information on many points. Finally, we realize that in spite of much care and revision we may have made inadvertent errors or failed to mention or emphasize pertinent topics. We shall be grateful to anyone who will be good enough to call our attention to these faults and we shall endeavor to correct them in later editions of this bulletin. v he Ohio Division of Geological Survey published the first edition of "Ohio Fossils" in 1955. It was readily received by hobbyists and students Tand the demand necessitated reprintings in 1956, 1959, 1961, 1962, 1963, and 1965. With the 1966 and 1970 edi- tion, the number of copies published totals over 30,000. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION NHAT FOSSILS ARE. Fossils are the remains of past life. The definition covers a wide field for it includes the bones and tusks of huge animals like the mastodon and mammoth and the tiniest shells of one-celled animals sometimes found literally by the millions in the rocks. Anything that is a clue to past life is included: trails and footprints, worm burrows, fossil leaves, tree trunks, and seeds, and the almost invisible spores of fungi. WHERE FOSSILS ARE FOUND. In Ohio, fossils are around us everywhere. They are found in all 88 of the counties of the state; the only difference between one county and another is the age and type of fossils found and their abundance or scarcity. On city streets people walk on fossils every day, for some of the old sidewalks are made of slabs of limestone that contain fossils. Even in our buildings, fossils are present in numbers: the walls of the State House in Columbus contain fossils; the stone walls and chimneys of houses and the gravel in our driveways are often crammed full of them. USES OF FOSSILS. Fossils are useful in three ways. To mankind in general, they are the evidence of animals of the long-distant past, the only clue to the nature of the life of millions of years ago. They show the appearance of different life forms one after another. Fossils are the documents from which development of life in the past can be traced. Fossils have a practical use too. Different kinds of fossils are found in the successive layers of rocks. The rocks can be recognized by their fossils. Some beds can be identified by their fossils even though they are separated by miles of ocean or by areas covered by soil or glacial debris. Even the layers far under the surface of the earth, when they are penetrated by the drill of the oil seeker, can be identified as to age by the fossils they contain. Some of the fossils brought up by the drill are broken but others are so small and so numerous that they can be identified. HOW FOSSILS ARE FOUND. In some parts of the state, fossils are so large and numerous that everybody knows about them. Elsewhere, fossils are not so obvious and they must be looked for with more care. The terms abundant, common, and rare are used as a matter of convenience throughout this book. We realize that their meaning varies greatly, as we found out when we compared statements in other publications with our own experience on some of the species of Ohio fossils. It seems best, therefore, to define our particular understanding of these terms so that you will not be misled by our statements. For us, abundant fossils are those that are so numerous in a particular formation and so widely distributed that they are bound to turn up in the majority of collections. Common fossils are numerous at some localities and not at others; or they may be widespread in most localities but they do not form a high proportion of any collection. Rare fossils are those that are found only occasionally. The main equipment of the fossil hunter is a pair of sharp eyes, a good stock of patience, and a few tools. The main tool is a hammer. It should be a fairly stout one, preferably with a chisel or point on one end of the head and a flat, square face on the other. A few cold chisels of assorted sizes may be useful in particularly hard rocks. The fossil hunter also needs a stout haversack to carry his finds, newspapers and tissue paper to wrap them in, and some pieces of paper to label them with.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paleozoic Gastropoda from the Moose River Synclinorium, Northern Maine
    Paleozoic Gastropoda from the Moose River Synclinorium, Northern Maine GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 503-A Paleozoic Gastropoda from the Moose River Synclinorium, Northern Maine By ARTJiUR J. BOUCOT and ELLIS L. YOCHELSON CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEONTOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 503-A An investigation of fossils primarily of Devonian age UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price 30 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __________________________________________ _ A1 Register of localities ___________________________ -- __ _ A15 Introduction ______________________________________ _ 1 References cited __________________ ---- __ ------------ 17 Occurrence and distribution of the gastropods _________ _ 3 Index ____________________________________________ _ 19 Systematic paleontology ____________________________ _ 3 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates follow index] PLATE 1. Gastropoda and miscellaneous fossils 2-3. Gastropoda Page FIGURE 1. Correlation table______________________ A2 2. Sketch of "Euomphalopterus" __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 17 TABLE Page TABLE 1. Distribution of gastropods in Paleozoic rocks of the Moose River synclinorium ________________ - ____ -- __ ------ A4 III CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEONTOLOGY PALEOZOIC GASTROPODA FROM THE MOOSE RIVER SYNCLINORIUM, NORTHERN MAINE By ARTHUR J. BoucoT and ELLIS L. Y OCHELSON .ABSTRACT units which has been determined from study of other Large-scale collecting in the middle Paleozoic strata of the fossil groups (chiefly brachipods and corals). Moose River synclinorium has yielded a few gastropods-one Except where indicated, the taxonomic classification Ordovician species, six species from the Silurian, and two from follows that published by Knight, Batten, and Y ochel­ rocks of Silurian or Devonian age, one of these also oceurring son (1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Patterns of Trilobites Across the End Ordovician Mass Extinction
    Evolutionary Patterns of Trilobites Across the End Ordovician Mass Extinction by Curtis R. Congreve B.S., University of Rochester, 2006 M.S., University of Kansas, 2008 Submitted to the Department of Geology and the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Kansas in partial fulfillment on the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2012 Advisory Committee: ______________________________ Bruce Lieberman, Chair ______________________________ Paul Selden ______________________________ David Fowle ______________________________ Ed Wiley ______________________________ Xingong Li Defense Date: December 12, 2012 ii The Dissertation Committee for Curtis R. Congreve certifies that this is the approved Version of the following thesis: Evolutionary Patterns of Trilobites Across the End Ordovician Mass Extinction Advisory Committee: ______________________________ Bruce Lieberman, Chair ______________________________ Paul Selden ______________________________ David Fowle ______________________________ Ed Wiley ______________________________ Xingong Li Accepted: April 18, 2013 iii Abstract: The end Ordovician mass extinction is the second largest extinction event in the history or life and it is classically interpreted as being caused by a sudden and unstable icehouse during otherwise greenhouse conditions. The extinction occurred in two pulses, with a brief rise of a recovery fauna (Hirnantia fauna) between pulses. The extinction patterns of trilobites are studied in this thesis in order to better understand selectivity of the
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Permian Brachiopods from Setamai, the Type Locality of The
    Sci. Rep., Niigata Univ., Ser. E(Geology), No. 16, 1-33, 2001 Middle Permian brachiopods from Setamai,the type locality of the Kanokura Formation,southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan Jun-ichi TAZAWA* and Yosuke IBARAKI** Abstract A Middle Permian (Kubergandian-Murgabian) brachiopod fauna is described from the type section of the lower Kanokura Formation in the Setamai area, southern Kitakami Moun tains, northeast Japan. This fauna contains the following nine species: Transennatia gratiosa, Tyloplecta cf. yangzeensis, Waagenoconcha sp., Linoproductus cora, Cancrinella sp., Leptodus nobilis, Derbyia grandis, Derbyia nipponica and Spiriferella keilhavii. The Setamai fauna is characterized by the mixuture of both the Boreal and Tethyan elements. Key words: Boreal-Tethyan mixed fauna, brachiopods. Middle Permian, Setamai, southern Kitakami Mountains. Introduction The Permian brachiopod specimens described in this paper were collected by the authors and late Prof. M. Minato of Hokkaido University from nine localities in the Kanokurasawa and Kacchizawa valleys in the Setamai area, the type locahty of the lower part of the Kanokura Formation, southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan (Figs. 1,2). The Middle Permian Kanokura Formation was named by Onuki (1937) as the Kanokura Stage, but Onuki (1956)later changed the name to 'formation' with the outcrops along the Kanokurasawa valley as its type section. The stratigraphy of the Kanokura Formation in the Setamai area was described and discussed in detail by Minato et al.(1954,1978,1979), Onuki (1956, 1969), Murata (1964), Saito (1966, 1968) and Choi (1973, 1976). In palaeontology, many species of fusulinaceans (Choi, 1973), corals (Minato, 1955; Minato and Kato, 1965), brachiopods (Hayasaka, 1953; Hayasaka and Minato, 1956; Minato and Nakamura, 1956; * Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan ** Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan (Manuscript received 24 November, 2(XX); accepted 21 December, 2000) J.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Mountain Limestone and Lower Carboniferous Rocks of the Fifeshire Coast from Burntisland to St Andrews
    ( 385 ) XVI.—Notes on the Mountain Limestone and Lower Carboniferous Rocks of the Fifeshire Coast from Burntisland to St Andrews. By the Rev. THOMAS BROWN, Edinburgh. (Read 17th April 1860.) Introduction. Mountain Limestone—continued. I. General Course of Strata. 2. Estuarine Strata, F to L. II. Trap Rocks. 3. Limestone L. III. Mountain Limestone. IV. Lower Carboniferous. 1. Six Upper Limestones, A to F. Myalina Beds. Corals. Petrified Trees. Shells. Marine Beds. Crustacea. Fossils. Fish. V. Results—The Two Groups defined. Tuberculated Fish. Introduction. In this paper I shall first refer to the circumstances under which the follow- ing observations were made. I had gone in the autumn of 1856 for a few weeks to Elie on the Fife coast, and was induced, as a means of relaxation and exercise in the open air, to pay some attention to the geology of the neighbourhood, resuming for a brief interval what was once a favourite pursuit. About a mile to the east of the village, I found a stratum well deserving attention—a thin bed of limestone—dipping in- land a little beyond the cliff on which stands the ruined Castle of Ardross. The fossil shells which it contained were of unusual form, and beautifully preserved ; there were fish remains of two or three species, and a small group of crustaceans still more remarkable. Among the fish I thought I could detect the large scales of an Irish species—the Holoirtijchius Fortlockii—and among the crustaceans there were the valves of Dithyrocaris, a genus particularly characteristic of the Irish beds. At once the question arose whether these fossils might not serve as links connecting this Ardross bed with the Irish series.
    [Show full text]
  • BOA2.1 Caecilian Biology and Natural History.Key
    The Biology of Amphibians @ Agnes Scott College Mark Mandica Executive Director The Amphibian Foundation [email protected] 678 379 TOAD (8623) 2.1: Introduction to Caecilians Microcaecilia dermatophaga Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia There are more than 20 synapomorphies (shared characters) uniting the group Lissamphibia Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Integumen is Glandular Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Glandular Skin, with 2 main types of glands. Mucous Glands Aid in cutaneous respiration, reproduction, thermoregulation and defense. Granular Glands Secrete toxic and/or noxious compounds and aid in defense Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Pedicellate Teeth crown (dentine, with enamel covering) gum line suture (fibrous connective tissue, where tooth can break off) basal element (dentine) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Sacral Vertebrae Sacral Vertebrae Connects pelvic girdle to The spine. Amphibians have no more than one sacral vertebrae (caecilians have none) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Amphicoelus Vertebrae Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Opercular apparatus Unique to amphibians and Operculum part of the sound conducting mechanism Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Fat Bodies Surrounding Gonads Fat Bodies Insulate gonads Evolution of Amphibians † † † † Actinopterygian Coelacanth, Tetrapodomorpha †Amniota *Gerobatrachus (Ray-fin Fishes) Lungfish (stem-tetrapods) (Reptiles, Mammals)Lepospondyls † (’frogomander’) Eocaecilia GymnophionaKaraurus Caudata Triadobatrachus Anura (including Apoda Urodela Prosalirus †) Salientia Batrachia Lissamphibia
    [Show full text]
  • Bivalvia, Late Jurassic) from South America
    Author's personal copy Pala¨ontol Z DOI 10.1007/s12542-016-0310-z RESEARCH PAPER Huncalotis, an enigmatic new pectinoid genus (Bivalvia, Late Jurassic) from South America 1 2 Susana E. Damborenea • He´ctor A. Leanza Received: 29 September 2015 / Accepted: 16 March 2016 Ó Pala¨ontologische Gesellschaft 2016 Abstract The extensive outcrops of the Late Jurassic– orientated at right angles to the shell margins. A few speci- Early Cretaceous Vaca Muerta Formation black shales and mens were found on the outside of large calcareous con- marls in the Neuque´n Basin have yielded very few bivalves, cretions within black shales; these are often articulated, and these are not well known. The material described here complete shells, which preserve the original convexity of the was collected in central Neuque´n, from late Tithonian cal- valves. In some cases these articulated shells seem to be careous levels within the black shales, between beds with associated with large ammonite shells, suggesting an epi- Substeueroceras sp. and with Argentiniceras noduliferum byssate (possibly also pseudoplanktonic) lifestyle. (Steuer). The material is referred to the new genus Huncalotis and to the new species H. millaini. The strongly Keywords Late Tithonian Á Neuque´n Basin Á Vaca inequivalve shells, the ligamental area with a triangular Muerta Formation Á Argentina Á Peru Á Bivalvia Á slightly prosocline resilifer, the right valve with ctenolium Pectinoidea Á Pectinidae and a very deep byssal notch, and the lack of radial orna- mentation make the shell of this new genus strikingly similar Kurzfassung Die reichlich zutage tretenden Schwarz- to the Triassic pectinid Pleuronectites.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Microstructures in Early Cambrian Molluscs
    Shell microstructures in Early Cambrian molluscs ARTEM KOUCHINSKY Kouchinsky, A. 2000. Shell microstructures in Early Cambrian molluscs. - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 45,2, 119-150. The affinities of a considerable part of the earliest skeletal fossils are problematical, but investigation of their microstructures may be useful for understanding biomineralization mechanisms in early metazoans and helpful for their taxonomy. The skeletons of Early Cambrian mollusc-like organisms increased by marginal secretion of new growth lamel- lae or sclerites, the recognized basal elements of which were fibers of apparently aragon- ite. The juvenile part of some composite shells consisted of needle-like sclerites; the adult part was built of hollow leaf-like sclerites. A layer of mineralized prism-like units (low aragonitic prisms or flattened spherulites) surrounded by an organic matrix possibly existed in most of the shells with continuous walls. The distribution of initial points of the prism-like units on a periostracurn-like sheet and their growth rate were mostly regular. The units may be replicated on the surface of internal molds as shallow concave poly- gons, which may contain a more or less well-expressed tubercle in their center. Tubercles are often not enclosed in concave polygons and may co-occur with other types of tex- tures. Convex polygons seem to have resulted from decalcification of prism-like units. They do not co-occur with tubercles. The latter are interpreted as casts of pore channels in the wall possibly playing a role in biomineralization or pits serving as attachment sites of groups of mantle cells. Casts of fibers and/or lamellar units may overlap a polygonal tex- ture or occur without it.
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • 001-012 Primeras Páginas
    PUBLICACIONES DEL INSTITUTO GEOLÓGICO Y MINERO DE ESPAÑA Serie: CUADERNOS DEL MUSEO GEOMINERO. Nº 9 ADVANCES IN TRILOBITE RESEARCH ADVANCES IN TRILOBITE RESEARCH IN ADVANCES ADVANCES IN TRILOBITE RESEARCH IN ADVANCES planeta tierra Editors: I. Rábano, R. Gozalo and Ciencias de la Tierra para la Sociedad D. García-Bellido 9 788478 407590 MINISTERIO MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA DE CIENCIA E INNOVACIÓN E INNOVACIÓN ADVANCES IN TRILOBITE RESEARCH Editors: I. Rábano, R. Gozalo and D. García-Bellido Instituto Geológico y Minero de España Madrid, 2008 Serie: CUADERNOS DEL MUSEO GEOMINERO, Nº 9 INTERNATIONAL TRILOBITE CONFERENCE (4. 2008. Toledo) Advances in trilobite research: Fourth International Trilobite Conference, Toledo, June,16-24, 2008 / I. Rábano, R. Gozalo and D. García-Bellido, eds.- Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, 2008. 448 pgs; ils; 24 cm .- (Cuadernos del Museo Geominero; 9) ISBN 978-84-7840-759-0 1. Fauna trilobites. 2. Congreso. I. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, ed. II. Rábano,I., ed. III Gozalo, R., ed. IV. García-Bellido, D., ed. 562 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher. References to this volume: It is suggested that either of the following alternatives should be used for future bibliographic references to the whole or part of this volume: Rábano, I., Gozalo, R. and García-Bellido, D. (eds.) 2008. Advances in trilobite research. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Type and Figured Fossils in the Worthen Collection at the Illinois
    s Cq&JI ^XXKUJtJLI 14oGS: CIR 524 c, 2 TYPE AND FIGURED FOSSILS IN THE WORTHEN COLLECTION AT THE ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Lois S. Kent GEOLOGICAL ILLINOIS Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION CIRCULAR 524 1982 COVER: This portrait of Amos Henry Worthen is from a print presented to me by Worthen's great-grandson, Arthur C. Brookley, Jr., at the time he visited the Illinois State Geological Survey in the late 1950s or early 1960s. The picture is the same as that published in connection with the memorial to Worthen in the appendix to Vol. 8 of the Geological Survey of Illinois, 1890. -LSK Kent, Lois S., Type and figured fossils in the Worthen Collection at the Illinois State Geological Survey. — Champaign, III. : Illinois State Geological Survey, 1982. - 65 p. ; 28 cm. (Circular / Illinois State Geological Survey ; 524) 1. Paleontology. 2. Catalogs and collections. 3. Worthen Collection. I. Title. II. Series. Editor: Mary Clockner Cover: Sandra Stecyk Printed by the authority of the State of Illinois/1982/2500 II I IHOI'.MAII '.I 'II Of.ir.AI MIHVI y '> 300 1 00003 5216 TYPE AND FIGURED FOSSILS IN THE WORTHEN COLLECTION AT THE ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Lois S. Kent | CIRCULAR 524 1982 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert E. Bergstrom, Acting Chief Natural Resources Building, 615 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820 TYPE AND FIGURED FOSSILS IN THE WORTHEN COLLECTION AT THE ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Introduction 2 Organization of the catalog 7 Notes 8 References 8 Fossil catalog 13 ABSTRACT This catalog lists all type and figured specimens of fossils in the part of the "Worthen Collection" now housed at the Illinois State Geological Survey in Champaign, Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee
    Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee By ROBERT C. MILICI and HELMUTH WEDOW, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Milici, Robert C 1931- Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and parts of the adjacent valley and ridge, Tennessee. (Geological Survey professional paper; 996) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:996 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Ordovician. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic--Silurian. 3. Geology--Tennessee--Sequatchie Valley. 4. Geology--Tennessee--Chattanooga region. I. Wedow, Helmuth, 1917- joint author. II: Title. Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley .... III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper; 996. QE660.M54 551.7'310976877 76-608170 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03002·1 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd International Trilobite Conference (Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, August 22-24, 1997) ABSTRACTS
    2nd International Trilobite Conference (Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, August 22-24, 1997) ABSTRACTS. Characters and Parsimony. Jonathan M. Adrain, Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United King- dom; Gregory D. Edgecombe, Centre for Evolutionary Research, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney South, New South Wales 2000, Australia Character analysis is the single most important element of any phylogenetic study. Characters are simply criteria for comparing homologous organismic parts between taxa. Homology of organismic parts in any phylogenetic study is an a priori assumption, founded upon topological similarity through some or all stages of ontogeny. Once homolo- gies have been suggested, characters are invented by specifying bases of comparison of organismic parts from taxon to taxon within the study group. Ideally, all variation in a single homology occurring within the study group should be accounted for. Comparisons are between attributes of homologous parts, (e.g., simple presence, size of some- thing, number of something), and these attributes are referred to as character states. Study taxa are assigned member- ship in one (or more, in the case of polymorphisms) character-state for each character in the analysis. A single char- acter now implies discrete groupings of taxa, but this in itself does not constitute a phylogeny. In order to suggest or convey phylogenetic information, the historical status of each character-state, and of the the group of taxa it sug- gests, must be evaluated. That is, in the case of any two states belonging to the same character, we need to discover whether one state is primitive (broadly speaking, ancestral) or derived (representative of an evolutionary innovation) relative to the other.
    [Show full text]