Stratigraphy of Silurian and Pre-Olentangy Devonian Rocks of the South Birmingham Pool Area, Erie and Lorain Counties, Ohio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stratigraphy of Silurian and Pre-Olentangy Devonian Rocks of the South Birmingham Pool Area, Erie and Lorain Counties, Ohio - ------------ ----------- --~--------- STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins. Chief Report of Investigations No. 70 STRATIGRAPHY OF SILURIAN AND PRE-OLENTANGY DEVONIAN ROCKS OF THE SOUTH BIRMINGHAM POOL AREA, ERIE AND LORAIN COUNTIES, OHIO by A. Janssens J Columbus 1968 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Col Ii ns, Chief Report of Investigations No. 70 STRATIGRAPHY OF SILURIAN AND PRE-OLENTANGY DEVONIAN ROCKS OF THE SOUTH BIRMINGHAM POOL AREA, ERIE AND LORAIN COUNTIES, OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1968 Printed and Bound By Columbu.,; Blank Book Co. Columhu~. Ohio 1 ~Hi:-;: CONTENTS Page Introduction . .. 1 Silurian System ......................................................................... Brassfield Formation ............................................................... Cabot Head Shale..................................................................... 2 Unnamed dolomite.................................................................... 2 Dayton Formation..................................................................... 5 Rochester Shale....................................................................... 5 Lockport Group........................................................................ 5 General statement.................................................................. 5 Gasport Formation.................................................................. 6 Goat Island Formation............................................................. 6 Guelph Formation................................................................... 6 Salina Group........................................................................... 8 Raisin River Dolomite............................................................... 8 Devonian System:....................................................................... 8 Bois Blanc Formation............................................................... 8 Detroit River Group and Columbus Limestone................................. 9 Delaware Limestone................................................................. 12 Structure . 12 References cited........................................................................ 12 Appendix - Sample descriptions..................................................... 14 ILLUSTRATIONS Figures 1. Location map........................................................................ 2 2. Representative gamma ray-neutron log........................................ 2 3. Gamma ray-neutron log showing shale below the Dayton Formation 5 4. Gamma ray-neutron log cross section of the Lockport Group showing biohermal facies......... .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 5. Thickness of the biohermal facies of the Guelph Formation............ 7 6. Structure on top of the Delaware Limestone................................. 9 7. Structure on top of the Rochester Shale...................................... 10 8. Structure on top of the Trenton Limestone................................... 11 TABLES 1. Summary of Silurian and Middle Devonian stratigraphy of the South Birmingham Pool area..................................................... 3 2. Well data............................................................................. 4 111 Blank Page STRATIGRAPHY OF SILURIAN AND PRE-OLENTANGY DEVONIAN ROCKS OF THE SOUTH BIRMINGHAM POOL AREA, ERIE AND LORAIN COUNTIES, OHIO by A. Janssens I:\TRODUCTION rocks are heavily stained with oil, rs the biohermal facies of the Guelph Formation. Discovery of oil in 1966 in sandstone of the Trem- The wells used in this report are listed in table 2. pealeau Formation (Cambrian) near Birmingham in Flor- Sample descriptions are listed in the appendix. ence Township, Erie County, resulted in about 20 wells being drilled to this sandstone in the Birmingham area and in adjacent Henrietta Township, Lorain County. SILURIAN SYSTEM The discovery well was the Sun Oil Co. #l Krysik- Brassfield Formation Wakefield et al. unit. The productive area has been designated the South Birmingham Pool (fig. 1). The name Brassfield limestone was used by Foerste The purpose of this report is to describe and dis- (1906, p. 27) for exposures near Brassfield in Madison cuss the stratigraphy of the Silurian and Devonian County, Kentucky. The unit in that locality is approxi- carbonate rocks (table 1) in the South Birmingham mately 21 feet thick, is overlain by the Plum Creek Pool area as a part of a continuing statewide study Clay [Cabot Head Shale], and is unconformably under- of this stratigraphic interval. These rocks have been lain by Ordovician rocks. Rexroad and others (1965, p. the subject of rather intensive investigation on the 8) changed the name to Brassfield Formation because outcrop but virtually nothing has been published on of the considerable amount of shale and dolomite in the their nature in the subsurface. unit. The present investigation shows that rocks former- The Brassfield Formation can be traced from the ly placed in the undifferentiated Lockport Group (Silu- type section to the report area, where it consists of rian) in the report area can be subdivided and corre- both fine- to coarse-grained limestone and crystalline lated with the Middle Silurian section of southwestern dolomite and minor amounts of shale and sandstone. Ontario. In the report area one of these subdivisions, The limestone and dolomite vary in color from light- to the Guelph Formation, has a biohermal facies which medium- to brownish-gray, and are glauconitic, cherry, reaches a thickness of more than 90 feet. In the dis- fossiliferous, and in part bioclastic. Hematite and thin cussion of Devonian rocks the interpretation is offered lenses of grayish-green shale and slightly calcareous that the Detroit River Group, rather than having been or dolomitic fine-grained brownish-gray sandstone are truncated by the overlying Columbus Limestone (Dow, found in the upper half of the formation. Silty and argil- 1962), has a facies which is indistinguishable from laceous limestone or dolomite occurs in the basal por- the Columbus Limestone. tion of the formation. The thickness of the Brassfield Three potentially productive gas or oil zones occur ranges from 23 to 44 feet and averages about 30 feet. in structural highs within the described section. The The lower boundary of the Brassfield is its con- highest gas zone occurs within the Columbus Lime- tact with Upper Ordovician rocks. The contact, gener- stone (in the part of the formation erroneously referred ally considered a regional unconformity, is distinct to by some drillers as the Oriskany Sandstone). The on the gamma ray-neutron log (fig. 2) and is marked second gas zone is the Newburg zone, which lies im- in the samples by the change from red shale (Queen- mediately below the lowest anhydrite in the section. ston) to carbonate (Brassfie Id). The Br ass field is tran- The third zone, which contains gas and in which the sitional with the overlying Cabot Head Shale (fig. 2) 1 2 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SOUTH BIRMINGHAM POOL 0600 SOUTH Olenlonqy Shale ~BIRMINGHAM Delaware Limestone POOL 0700 Columbus Limestone ---------?-------- - 0800 Detroit River Group Bois Blanc Formot1on 0900 FIGURE 1. -Location map. and the contact is placed where shale (Cabot Head) dominates over carbonate (Brassfield). 1000 Cabot Head Shale The name Cabots Head was used by Grabau (1913, 1100 p. 460) for red and green shale with an exposed thick- ness of 150 feet overlying the Keppel (Manitoulin) Dolomite near Cabots Head, Ontario. The formation, now known as Cabot Head, can be traced from south- 1200 Q_ western Ontario to the South Birmingham Pool area, :::i 0 where it consists of grayish-green and minor amounts a: (.'.) c of reddish-brown shale and a considerable amount of <! 1300 z interbedded coarse-grained dolomite. The dolomite is _J <! hematitic in part. Thin lenses of dense fine-grained (f) gray and brownish-gray sandstone occur in the lower B part of the formation and constitute the western feather- 1400 I edge of the ''Clinton'' sandstones in northern Ohio. I Preliminary results of a regional study of the "Clin- ton" sandstones of Ohio by the writer show that these sandstones occur in a stratigraphic interval equivalent 1500 to the Brassfield-Cabot Head interval and that there A is a facies relationship between the "Clinton" sand- stones of eastern Ohio and the Brassfield Formation and Cabot Head Shale of central Ohio. The thickness 1600 Q_ of the Cabot Head in the report area ranges from 83 to :::i 0 115 feet and averages 110 feet. a: Guelph Formot1on (.'.) The Cabot Head is overlain by a coarsely crystal- r- a: 1700 0 line dolomite. The contact, distinct on the gamma ray- Q_ >< neutron log (fig. 2), can be identified in the samples u Goat Island Formation 0 by the change from shale and dolomite to dolomite. _J j_ Gosport Formot1on Unnamed dolomite 1800 A distinctive somewhat sandy medium to coarsely crystalline medium- to dark-gray dolomite overlies the 1900 Cabot Head in the South Birmingham Pool area. The unit is 10 to 15 feet thick and is lithologically similar to and occupies the same stratigraphic position as an unnamed limestone (Oldham Limestone?; Foerste, 1906, 2000 p. 47) to the south in Adams County, Ohio (unit 3 in section 9 of Rexroad and others, 1965, p. 23). However, FIGURE 2.-Representative gamma ray-neutron log (Sun with current well control, this dolomite cannot be traced Oil Co. #1 Krysik-Wakefield et al. unit). SILURIAN STRATIGRAPHY 3 TABLE
Recommended publications
  • Fractured Shale Gas Potential in New York
    FRACTURED SHALE GAS POTENTIAL IN NEW YORK David G. HILL and Tracy E. LOMBARDI TICORA Geosciences, Inc., Arvada, Colorado, USA John P. MARTIN New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, New York, USA ABSTRACT In 1821, a shallow well drilled in the Devonian age shale ushered in a new era for the United States when natural gas was produced, transported and sold to local establishments in the town of Fredonia, New York. Following this discovery, hundreds of shallow shale wells were drilled along the Lake Erie shoreline and eventually several shale gas fields were established southeastward from the lake in the late 1800’s. Since the mid 1900’s, approximately 100 wells have been drilled in New York to test the fractured shale potential of the Devonian and Silurian age shales. With so few wells drilled over the past century, the true potential of fractured shale reservoirs has not been thoroughly assessed, and there may be a substantial resource. While the resource for shale gas in New York is large, ranging from 163-313 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) and the history of production dates back over 180 years, it has not been a major contributor to natural gas production in New York. A review of the history and research conducted on the shales shows that the resource in New York is poorly understood and has not been adequately tested. Other shales such as the Silurian and Ordovician Utica Shale may also hold promise as new commercial shale gas reservoirs. Experience developing shale gas plays in the past 20 years has demonstrated that every shale play is unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • (Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York
    Revised Stratigraphy and Correlations of the Niagaran Provincial Series (Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York By Carlton E. Brett, Dorothy H. Tepper, William M. Goodman, Steven T. LoDuca, and Bea-Yeh Eckert U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2086 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences of the University of Rochester UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1995 10 REVISED STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATIONS OF THE NIAGARAN PROVINCIAL SERIES been made in accordance with the NASC. Because the The history of nomenclature of what is now termed the NASC does not allow use of the "submember" category, Medina Group, beginning with Conrad ( 1837) and ending units that would be of this rank are treated as informal units with Bolton (1953), is presented in Fisher (1954); Bolton and have been given alphanumeric designations. Informal (1957, table 2) presents a detailed summary of this nomen- units are discussed under the appropriate "member" clature for 1910-53. A historical summary of nomenclature categories. of the Medina Group in the Niagara region is shown in fig- The use of quotes for stratigraphic nomenclature in this ure 7. Early investigators of the Medina include Conrad report is restricted to units that have been misidentified or (1837); Vanuxem (1840, first usage of Medina; 1842); Hall abandoned. If stratigraphic nomenclature for a unit has (1840, 1843); Gilbert (1899); Luther (1899); Fairchild changed over time, the term for the unit is shown, with cap- (1901); Grabau (1901, 1905, 1908, 1909, 1913); Kindle and italization, as given in whatever reference is cited rather Taylor (1913); Kindle (1914); Schuchert (1914); Chadwick than according to the most recent nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the New Chairman
    Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy Newsletter No. 21 April, 2005 MESSAGE FROM THE NEW CHAIRMAN Dear SDS Members: This new Newsletter gives me the pleasant opportunity to thank you for your confidence which should allow me to lead our Devonian Subcommission successfully through the next four years until the next International Geological Congress in Norway. Ahmed El Hassani, as Vice-Chairman, and John Marshall, as our new Secretary, will assist and help me. As it has been our habit in the past, our outgoing chairman, Pierre Bultynck, has continued his duties until the end of the calendar year, and in the name of all the Subcommission, I like to express our warmest thanks to him for all his efforts, his enthusi- asm for our tasks, his patience with the often too slow progress of research, and for the humorous, well organized and skil- ful handling of our affairs, including our annual meetings. At the same time I like to thank all our outgoing Titular Members for their partly long-time service and I express my hope that they will continue their SDS work with the same interest and energy as Corresponding Members. The new ICS rules require a rather constant change of voting members and the change from TM to CM status should not necessarily be taken as an excuse to adopt the lifestyle of a “Devonian pensioner”. I see no reason why constantly active SDS members shouldn´t become TM again, at a later stage. On the other side, the rather strong exchange of voting members should bring in some fresh ideas and some shift towards modern stratigraphical tech- niques.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio
    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Devonian Formations in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio
    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Horace R. Collins, State Geologist and Di v ision Chief David K. Webb, Jr., Geologist and Assistant Chief Eleanor J. Hyle, Secretary Jean S. Brown, Geologist and Editor Pauline Smyth, Geologist Betty B. Baber, Geologist REGIONAL GEOLOGY SECTION SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY SECTION Richard A. Struble, Geologist and Section Head William J. Buschman, Jr., Geologist and Section Head Richard M. Delong, Geologist Michael J. Clifford, Geologist G. William Kalb, Geochemist Adriaan J anssens, Geologist Douglas L. Kohout, Geologis t Frederick B. Safford, Geologist David A. Stith, Geologist Jam es Wooten, Geologist Aide Joel D. Vormelker, Geologist Aide Barbara J. Adams, Clerk· Typist B. Margalene Crammer, Clerk PUBLICATIONS SECTION LAKE ERIE SECTION Harold J. Fl inc, Cartographer and Section Head Charles E. Herdendorf, Geologist and Sectwn Head James A. Brown, Cartographer Lawrence L. Braidech, Geologist Donald R. Camburn, Cartovapher Walter R. Lemke, Boat Captain Philip J. Celnar, Cartographer David B. Gruet, Geologist Aide Jean J. Miller, Photocopy Composer Jean R. Ludwig, Clerk- Typist STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 GEOLOGY SERVES OHIO CONTENTS Page Introduction . 1 Previous investigations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Study methods . 4 Detroit River Group . .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. 6 Sylvania Sandstone ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC SUMMARY of the APPALACHIAN BASIN, with REFERENCE to the SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL of RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS by George W
    TEI-791 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY" GEOLOGIC SUMMARY OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN, WITH;REFERENCE TO THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS* By George W. Colton June 1961 Report TEI-791 This report is preliminary and ha^;not been edited for conformity with G^logical Survey format and nomenclature. ?1 ^Prepared on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission. CONTENTS Abstract* .......................... 5 Introduction. ........................ 7 Purpose of report. ................... 7 Organization of report .................. 7 Location and extent of area. .............. Q Acknowledgments. .................... 10 Geologic framework. ..................... 10 Depositional framework ................. 10 Structural framework .................. llj. Stratigraphy. ........................ 17 Late Precambrian stratified sequence .......... 17 Early Cambrian clastic sequence. ............ 18 Thickness and depth ................ 22 Cambrian-Ordovician carbonate sequence ......... 23 Thickness and depth . , ........... 35 Late Ordovician clastic sequence ............ 35 Thickness and depth ................ Mi- Early Silurian clastic sequence. ............ kk Thickness and depth ................ 51 Silurian-Devonian carbonate sequence .......... 52 Thickness and depth ................ 62 Devonian classic sequence. ............... 63 Thickness and depth ................ 69 Mississippian sequence ................. 70 Thickness and depth ................ 79 Pennsylvanian sequence ................. 79 Waste
    [Show full text]
  • Contents List of Illustrations LETTER OF
    STATE OF MICHIGAN Plate IV. A. Horizontal and oblique lamination, Sylvania MICHIGAN GEOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SURVEY Sandstone......................................................................27 Plate IV. B. Stratification and lamination, in sand dune, Dune Publication 2. Geological Series 1. Park, Ind.........................................................................28 THE MONROE FORMATION OF SOUTHERN Plate V. Sand grains, enlarged 14½ times ............................31 MICHIGAN AND ADJOINING REGIONS Plate VI. Desert sand grains, enlarged 14½ times ................31 by Plate VII. Sylvania and St. Peter sand grains, enlarged 14½ A. W. Grabau and W. H. Sherzer times. .............................................................................32 PUBLISHED AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR Figures 1909. Figure 1. Map showing distribution of Sylvania Sandstone. 25 LANSING, MICHIGAN WYNKOOP HALLENBECK CRAWFORD CO., STATE Figure 2. Cross bedding in Sylvania sandstone ....................27 PRINTERS Figure 3. Cross bedding on east wall of Toll’s Pit quarry ......28 1910 Figure 4. Cross bedding shown on south wall of Toll’s Pit quarry.............................................................................28 Contents Figure 5. Cross bedding on south wall of Toll’s Pit quarry in Sylvania sandstone. .......................................................28 Letter of Transmittal. ......................................................... 1 Figure 6. Cross bedding shown on south wall
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee
    Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee By ROBERT C. MILICI and HELMUTH WEDOW, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Milici, Robert C 1931- Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and parts of the adjacent valley and ridge, Tennessee. (Geological Survey professional paper; 996) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:996 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Ordovician. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic--Silurian. 3. Geology--Tennessee--Sequatchie Valley. 4. Geology--Tennessee--Chattanooga region. I. Wedow, Helmuth, 1917- joint author. II: Title. Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley .... III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper; 996. QE660.M54 551.7'310976877 76-608170 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03002·1 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 133 September 1951 DETROIT RIVER GROUP IN THE MICHIGAN BASIN By Kenneth K. Landes UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, D. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction............................ ^ Amherstburg formation................. 7 Nomenclature of the Detroit River Structural geology...................... 14 group................................ i Geologic history ....................... ^4 Detroit River group..................... 3 Economic geology...................... 19 Lucas formation....................... 3 Reference cited........................ 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Location of wells and cross sections used in the study .......................... ii 2. Correlation chart . ..................................... 2 3. Cross sections A-«kf to 3-G1 inclusive . ......................;.............. 4 4. Facies map of basal part of Dundee formation. ................................. 5 5. Aggregate thickness of salt beds in the Lucas formation. ........................ 8 6. Thickness map of Lucas formation. ........................................... 10 7. Thickness map of Amherstburg formation (including Sylvania sandstone member. 11 8. Lime stone/dolomite facies map of Amherstburg formation ...................... 13 9. Thickness of Sylvania sandstone member of Amherstburg formation.............. 15 10. Boundary of the Bois Blanc formation in southwestern Michigan.
    [Show full text]