DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan By Beth A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation Beth, A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves, 2007, Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michi- gan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1236, 78 p. Cover photographs Clockwise from upper left: Photograph of Pretty Lake by Gary Huffman. Photograph of a river in winter by Dan Wydra. Photographs of Lake Michigan and the Looking Glass River by Sharon Baltusis. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................1 Study Area.......................................................................................................................................................1 County Summaries .........................................................................................................................................3 Alcona County .......................................................................................................................................3 Alger County ..........................................................................................................................................3 Allegan County ......................................................................................................................................4 Alpena County .......................................................................................................................................5 Antrim County ........................................................................................................................................6 Arenac County .......................................................................................................................................6 Baraga County .......................................................................................................................................8 Barry County ..........................................................................................................................................8 Bay County .............................................................................................................................................9 Benzie County ......................................................................................................................................10 Berrien County.....................................................................................................................................11 Branch County .....................................................................................................................................11 Calhoun County ...................................................................................................................................12 Cass County .........................................................................................................................................13 Charlevoix County ...............................................................................................................................13 Cheboygan County ..............................................................................................................................14 Chippewa County ................................................................................................................................15 Clare County.........................................................................................................................................16 Clinton County......................................................................................................................................17 Crawford County .................................................................................................................................18 Delta County.........................................................................................................................................18 Dickinson County ................................................................................................................................19 Eaton County ........................................................................................................................................20 Emmet County ......................................................................................................................................22 Genesee County ..................................................................................................................................23 Gladwin County ...................................................................................................................................24 Gogebic County ...................................................................................................................................25 Grand Traverse County ......................................................................................................................26 Gratiot County ......................................................................................................................................27 Hillsdale County...................................................................................................................................28 Houghton County.................................................................................................................................29 Huron County .......................................................................................................................................29 Ingham County.....................................................................................................................................31 Ionia County .........................................................................................................................................32 Iosco County ........................................................................................................................................33 Iron County ...........................................................................................................................................34 Isabella County ....................................................................................................................................35 Jackson County ...................................................................................................................................35 Kalamazoo County ..............................................................................................................................36 Kalkaska County ..................................................................................................................................37 iv Kent County ..........................................................................................................................................37 Keweenaw County ..............................................................................................................................39 Lake County..........................................................................................................................................39 Lapeer County......................................................................................................................................40 Leelanau County..................................................................................................................................41 Lenawee County..................................................................................................................................42 Livingston County ................................................................................................................................43 Luce County .........................................................................................................................................44 Mackinac County ................................................................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Summary of Petroleum Plays and Characteristics of the Michigan Basin
    DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A summary of petroleum plays and characteristics of the Michigan basin by Ronald R. Charpentier Open-File Report 87-450R This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado 80225 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION.............................................. 3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY.......................................... 3 SOURCE ROCKS.............................................. 6 THERMAL MATURITY.......................................... 11 PETROLEUM PRODUCTION...................................... 11 PLAY DESCRIPTIONS......................................... 18 Mississippian-Pennsylvanian gas play................. 18 Antrim Shale play.................................... 18 Devonian anticlinal play............................. 21 Niagaran reef play................................... 21 Trenton-Black River play............................. 23 Prairie du Chien play................................ 25 Cambrian play........................................ 29 Precambrian rift play................................ 29 REFERENCES................................................ 32 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Index map of Michigan basin province (modified from Ells, 1971, reprinted by permission of American Association of Petroleum Geologists)................. 4 2. Structure contour map on top of Precambrian basement, Lower Peninsula
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Framework of Mississippian Rocks in the Central Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    Hydrogeologic Framework of Mississippian Rocks in the Central Lower Peninsula of Michigan By D.B. WESTJOHN and T.L. WEAVER U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4246 Lansing, Michigan 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm name in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Earth Science Information Center 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 Open-File Reports Section Lansing, Ml 48911 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................... 1 Geology .......................................................... 3 Coldwater Shale ................................................ 3 Marshall Sandstone .............................................. 6 Michigan Formation .............................................. 7 Hydrogeologic framework of Mississippian rocks ................................ 8 Relations of stratigraphic units to aquifer and confining units .................... 8 Delineation of aquifer- and confining-unit boundaries ......................... 9 Description of confining units and the Marshall aquifer ........................ 9 Michigan confining
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY TWP RNG SEC OPERATOR WELL NAME FORMATIONS from to BOXE S COMMENTS TYPE Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of Trenary MW 24
    COUNTY TWP RNG SEC OPERATOR WELL NAME FORMATIONS FROM TO BOXE COMMENTS TYPE S Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of MW 24 Limestone with vugs and 10 112 13 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary shale layers Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of MW 25 (TWQ) Limestone w\lenses of 4 52 8 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary shale and siltstone Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of MW 26 (TWW) Ls. & vugs w\lenses of 5 92 10 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary shale and siltstone Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of MW 29 Ls. & vugs w\lenses of 47 81 4 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary shale and siltstone Alger 44N 21W 20 DNR--ERD Village of RL-4 Dolomite 13 29 2 Lithologic log available Core Trenary Alger 44N 21W 20 DNR--ERD Village of RL-6 Dolomite 17 34 2 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary Alger 44N 21W 20 DNR--ERD Village of RL-8 Dolomite 21 37 2 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary Alger 44N 22W 9 Cleveland-Cliffs Kiva Core #1 Black River to 18 567 4 Lithologic log available. Core Precambrian Samples of core chips only Alger 45N 22W 31 Cleveland-Cliffs #1 Dolomite & sandstone 26 132 13 Lithologic log available. Core Alger 46N 18W 29 Amoco Production Per.# St. Amour 1-29 Autrain Fm. 90 361 45 Lithologic log available. Core 021-871-202 Declared a "lost hole" & moved short distance to start 1-29R. Alger 46N 18W 29 Amoco Production Per.# St. Amour 1-29R Autrain, Munising, Oronto 160 7179 929 Lithologic and several electric Core 021-871-202 (Jacobsville) and Portage logs are available.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field and Petrographic Study of the Freda
    A FIELD AND PETROGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE FREDA FORMATION ALONG THE MONTREAL RIVER, GOGEBIC COUNTY, MICHIGAN fey GORDON R. SMALE A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 1958 ProQuest Number: 10008738 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10008738 Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 A FIELD AND PETROGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE FREDA FORMATION ALONG THE MONTREAL RIVER, GOGEBIC COUNTY, MICHIGAN •"by Gordon R „ Smal'e ABSTRACT The Montreal River provides a geographic boundary between Wisconsin and Michigan on the south shore of Lake Superior. A geologic study, both field and laboratory, was made of the 12,000 foot thickness of steeply dipping Freda for­ mation exposed along this river. The field study Includes mapping of sedimentary structures In an effort to determine the dominant current directions during deposition of the formation. Pebble and quartz grain orientation as well as heavy mineral and rock composition analyses were made In the laboratory to supplement the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS Cience for a Changing World AVAILABILITY of BOOKS and MAPS of the U.S
    PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS cience for a changing world AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current- year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publica­ tions released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may be no longer available. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey Earth of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single Science Information Centers (ESIC's), all of which are authorized copies of Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are ANCHORAGE, Alaska Rm. 101,4230 University Dr. obtainable by mail from LAKEWOOD, Colorado Federal Center, Bldg. 810 U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services MENLO PARK, California Bldg. 3, Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-13
    Attachment B-13 Hydrogeology for Underground Injection Control · n Michigan: Part 1 Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Underground Injection Control Program 1981 Acknowledgements ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF DENNIS L. CURRAN LINDA J. MILLER DONALD N. LESKE Project Coordinator Cartographer Regional Coordinator PROJECT DIRECTORS RICHARD N. PASSERO W. Thomas Straw Lloyd J. Schmaltz Ph .D., Professor of Geology Ph.D., Professor of Geology Chatrman, Department of Geology Department of Geology, Western Michigan University RESEARCH STAFF CYNTHIA BATHRICK WILLIAM GIERKE CRYSTAL KEMTER JEFFREY PFOST PAUL CIARAMITARO PAUL GOODREAULT STEVEN KIMM NICK POGONCHEFF PATRICIA DALIAN DAVID HALL KEVIN KINCARE KIFF SAMUELSON DOUGLAS DANIELS EVELYN HALL MICHAEL KLEIN JEFFREY SPRUIT DARCEY DAVENPORT THOMAS HANNA BARBARA LEONARD GARY STEFANIAK JEFFREY DEYOUNG ROBERT HORNTVEDT THOMAS LUBY JOSEPH VANDERMEULEN GEORGE DUBA JON HERMANN HALLY MAHAN LISA VARGA SHARON EAST WILLIAM JOHNSTON JAMES McLAUGHLIN KATHERINE WILSON JAMES FARNSWORTH PHILLIP KEAVEY DEANNA PALLADINO MICHAEL WIREMAN LINDA FENNER DONALD PENNEMAN CARTOGRAPHIC STAFF LINDA J. MILLER Chief Cartographer SARAH CUNNINGHAM CAROL BUCHANAN ARLENE D. SHUB DAVID MOORE KENNETH BATTS CHRISTOPHER H. JANSEN NORMAN AMES ANDREW DAVIS ANN CASTEL PATRICK HUDSON MARK LUTZ JOAN HENDRICKSEN MAPPING CONSULTANT THOMAS W. HODLER Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geography Department of Geography Western Michigan University CLERICAL PERSONNEL KARN KIK JANET NIEWOONDER
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Devonian Formations in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio
    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Horace R. Collins, State Geologist and Di v ision Chief David K. Webb, Jr., Geologist and Assistant Chief Eleanor J. Hyle, Secretary Jean S. Brown, Geologist and Editor Pauline Smyth, Geologist Betty B. Baber, Geologist REGIONAL GEOLOGY SECTION SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY SECTION Richard A. Struble, Geologist and Section Head William J. Buschman, Jr., Geologist and Section Head Richard M. Delong, Geologist Michael J. Clifford, Geologist G. William Kalb, Geochemist Adriaan J anssens, Geologist Douglas L. Kohout, Geologis t Frederick B. Safford, Geologist David A. Stith, Geologist Jam es Wooten, Geologist Aide Joel D. Vormelker, Geologist Aide Barbara J. Adams, Clerk· Typist B. Margalene Crammer, Clerk PUBLICATIONS SECTION LAKE ERIE SECTION Harold J. Fl inc, Cartographer and Section Head Charles E. Herdendorf, Geologist and Sectwn Head James A. Brown, Cartographer Lawrence L. Braidech, Geologist Donald R. Camburn, Cartovapher Walter R. Lemke, Boat Captain Philip J. Celnar, Cartographer David B. Gruet, Geologist Aide Jean J. Miller, Photocopy Composer Jean R. Ludwig, Clerk- Typist STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 GEOLOGY SERVES OHIO CONTENTS Page Introduction . 1 Previous investigations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Study methods . 4 Detroit River Group . .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. 6 Sylvania Sandstone ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROLS on DOLOMITIZATION of the UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE in SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department Of
    CONTROLS ON DOLOMITIZATION OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE IN SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department of Geological Sciences APPROVED: Dr. Katherine Giles, Ph.D., Chair Dr. Richard Langford, Ph.D. Dr. Matthew Johnston, Ph.D. Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Collin James Gray 2015 Dedication I dedicate my thesis work to my family. My dedicated and loving parents, Michael and Deborah Gray have always supported me and provided words of encouragement during the struggles of my research. The support provided was second to none and I could not imagine reaching this point in my education without them. I also dedicate this thesis to my two brothers, Michael and Nathan Gray and my sister Nicole Gray. Without these role models I cannot imagine where my education would have ended. I will always appreciate the support provided by all three of you and consider you to be role models that I can always look up to. CONTROLS ON DOLOMITIZATION OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE IN SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY by COLLIN JAMES GRAY, B.S. GEOLOGY THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geological Sciences THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2015 Acknowledgements I wish to thank my committee whose time and expertise provided excellent input into my research. Dr. Katherine Giles, my M.S. supervisor provided guidance and provided endless suggestions and recommendations throughout my research while continuously motivating me to continue my education.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Aquifer Systems of Noble County, Indiana EXPLANATION
    Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Governor Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Robert E. Carter Jr., Director Aquifer Systems Map 50-B BEDROCK AQUIFER SYSTEMS OF NOBLE COUNTY, INDIANA R. 11 E. R. 12 E. The occurrence of bedrock aquifers depends on the original composition of the rocks and R. 10 E. R. 11 E. T. 36 N. subsequent changes which influence the hydraulic properties. Post-depositional R. 9 E. R. 10 E. T. 35 N. processes which promote jointing, fracturing, and solution activity of exposed bedrock R. 8 E. R. 9 E. generally increase the hydraulic conductivity (permeability) of the upper portion of R. 7 E. R. 8 E. 6 bedrock aquifer systems. Because permeability in many places is greatest near the W 4 3 Wolcottville 1 bedrock surface, bedrock units within the upper 100 feet are commonly the most 0 1 2 0 T. 36 N. W 5 4 Tamarack productive aquifers. T. 35 N. 0 d 0 6 5 2 a 9 3 E Lake o 4 3 d 5 2 4 5 R a 6 7 1 1 5 2 The bedrock aquifer systems in Noble County are overlain by unconsolidated deposits of o 3 y 3 4 t R 5 d n 6 R a varying thickness, ranging from around 200 feet to more than 450 feet. The y u t S o E o n R C 0 u unconsolidated thickness is typically greater than 300 feet in the county. The bedrock 0 o y t No 1 C County Road 1100 N rt hp n Cree aquifers, therefore, are under confined conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-1990 Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan Brendan Ciaran Curran Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Curran, Brendan Ciaran, "Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan" (1990). Master's Theses. 1053. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1053 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESERVOIR GEOLOGY OF THE DUNDEE LIMESTONE, WEST BRANCH FIELD, MICHIGAN by Brendan Ciaran Curran A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 1990 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. RESERVOIR GEOLOGY OF THE DUNDEE LIMESTONE, WEST BRANCH FIELD, MICHIGAN Brendan Ciaran Curran, M.S. W estern Michigan University, 1990 West Branch field is a low-relief, NW-SE-trending anticline near the center of the Michigan basin. Since 1934, the Dundee Limestone (Middle Devonian) has produced over 12 million barrels of oil from this field. From core studies, six depositional facies types were recognized in the Dundee. These are dominated by bioclastic carbonate sand facies deposited in normal- marine shelf settings. Although burial cements have occluded some porosity, carbonate sand facies have retained significant primary interparticle porosity and are the most important reservoir rocks.
    [Show full text]