DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology of the Dayton Region in Core and Outcrop—A Workshop and Field Trip for Citizens, Environmental Investigators, Geologists, and Educators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology of the Dayton Region in Core and Outcrop—A Workshop and Field Trip for Citizens, Environmental Investigators, Geologists, and Educators STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Chief Open-File Report 2012-1 GEOLOGY OF THE DAYTON REGION IN CORE AND OUTCROP—A WORKSHOP AND FIELD TRIP FOR CITIZENS, ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATORS, GEOLOGISTS, AND EDUCATORS By Gregory A. Schumacher, Michael P. Angle, Brian E. Mott, and Douglas J. Aden Prepared for the 2012 Geological Society of America North-Central Section meeting in Dayton, Ohio Columbusi 2012 DISCLAIMER The information contained herein has not been reviewed for technical accuracy and conformity with current ODNR Division of Geological Survey standards for formally published materials. The ODNR Division of Geological Survey does not guarantee this information to be free from errors, omissions, or inaccuracies and disclaims any responsibility or liability for interpretations or decisions based thereon. Cover photo: Steam Boat Rock—Large slump block of Cedarville Dolomite resting in the bed of the Little Miami River at Clifton Gorge State Nature Preserve. Recommended citation: Schumacher, G.A., Angle, M.P., Mott, B.E., and Aden, D.J., 2012, Geology of the Dayton region in core and outcrop—A workshop and fi eld trip for citizens, environmental investigators, geologists, and educators: Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1, 58 p. ii AGENDA MORNING WORKSHOP 9:00–10:00 A.M. Welcome; Geology of the Dayton Region 10:00–11:00 A.M. Utility of ODNR Division of Geological Survey map products 11:00–12:00 P.M. Geology of the Dayton Region in core (hands-on exercises) AFTERNOON FIELD TRIP 1:00 P.M. Depart Dayton Convention Center 1:00–1:30 P.M. Drive to Oakes Quarry Park 1:30–2:50 P.M. STOP 1: Oakes Quarry Park 2:50–3:00 P.M. Drive to Clifton Gorge State Nature Preserve 3:00–4:20 P.M. STOP 2: Clifton Gorge State Nature Preserve 4:20–5:00 P.M. Fill out evaluations; return to Dayton Convention Center WORKSHOP AND FIELD TRIP LEADERS Gregory A. Schumacher Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey H. R. Collins Laboratory 33307 South Old State Road Delaware, OH 43015 (740) 548-7348, ext. 125 [email protected] Michael P. Angle Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-2 Columbus, OH 43229-6693 (614) 265-6602 [email protected] Brian E. Mott DLZ Ohio 6121 Huntley Road Columbus, OH 43229 (614) 848-4141 [email protected] Douglas J. Aden Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-2 Columbus, OH 43229-6693 (614) 265-6579 [email protected] iii CONTENTS Page Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Geology of the Dayton region ............................................................................................... 1 What geologic maps should I use to determine the geology beneath my feet? .................. 5 What is rock coring? .............................................................................................................. 5 Field trip road log ................................................................................................................. 7 Stop 1. Oakes Quarry Park .................................................................................................. 8 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 8 Geology of the Oakes Quarry Park ............................................................................... 8 Early Silurian ......................................................................................................... 8 Ice-Age ..................................................................................................................... 12 Stop 2. Clifton Gorge State Nature Preserve ...................................................................... 14 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. 17 References cited .................................................................................................................... 17 Fact Sheets ............................................................................................................................ 18 Glacial till ....................................................................................................................... 18 Glacial sand and gravel deposits .................................................................................. 20 Glacial sand deposits ..................................................................................................... 23 Glacial lacustrine deposits ............................................................................................ 26 Glacial silt deposits ........................................................................................................ 29 Glacial clay deposits ...................................................................................................... 32 Organic deposits ............................................................................................................ 35 Cedarville Dolomite ....................................................................................................... 38 Springfi eld Dolomite ...................................................................................................... 40 Euphemia Dolomite ....................................................................................................... 42 Massie Shale .................................................................................................................. 44 Osgood Shale .................................................................................................................. 46 Brassfi eld Formation ..................................................................................................... 48 Drakes Formation .......................................................................................................... 51 Whitewater Formation .................................................................................................. 53 Liberty Formation .......................................................................................................... 55 Waynesville Formation .................................................................................................. 57 FIGURES 1. Bedrock near-surface and subsurface stratigraphy of the Dayton region ................. 2 2. Location of the Dayton region in Ordovician time ...................................................... 3 3. Ohio karst areas ............................................................................................................ 4 4. Typical drill bits ............................................................................................................ 6 5. Bedrock geologic map of Oakes Quarry Park .............................................................. 9 6. The eastern highwall of Oakes Quarry Park displaying the characteristic limestone of the Brassfi eld Formation ....................................................................................... 10 7. Belfast Member of the Brassfi eld Formation in Oakes Quarry Park fl oor ................ 10 8. Rose diagram illustrating the prominent joint orientations preserved within the Belfast Member of the Brassfi eld Formation ........................................................... 11 9. Postulated position of the continents during the Late Ordovician/Early Silurian and Middle Pennsylvanian ........................................................................................ 11 10. The polished upper surface of the Brassfi eld Formation ............................................ 13 11. Rose diagram showing that the movement of glacial ice and meltwater was from the northwest to the southeast ........................................................................................ 13 12. Bedrock geologic map of the Clifton Gorge State Nature Preserve ........................... 15 13. Stages of gorge formation of Little Miami River in the Clifton, Ohio, area .............. 16 iv GEOLOGY OF THE DAYTON REGION IN CORE AND OUTCROP—A WORKSHOP AND FIELD TRIP FOR CITIZENS, ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATORS, GEOLOGISTS, AND EDUCATORS by Gregory A. Schumacher, Michael P. Angle, Brian E. Mott, and Douglas J. Aden INTRODUCTION distinguish one geologic unit from the underlying and overly- ing units. For example, if you turn ahead to the Brassfi eld The goal of today’s core workshop and fi eld trip is to Formation fact sheet (p. 48), you will fi nd an introductory learn about the geology of the Dayton, Ohio, region using paragraph describing: (1) the characteristic rock or rocks Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), Division found in the Brassfi eld, (2) the environment present in the of Geological Survey (Survey) mapping products and indi- Dayton region when the Brassfi eld was deposited, (3) how vidual fact sheets for a future fi eld guide entitled: Ohio’s the Brassfi eld was named, (4) the Brassfi eld’s mapped dis- Geology in Core and Outcrop—A Field Guide for Citizens tribution in the state of Ohio, and (5) unit thickness of the and Environmental and Geotechnical Investigators. For this Brassfi eld. Also, the statewide distribution of the Brassfi eld guidebook, the Dayton region is defi ned as Montgomery
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Detrital Zircon Geochronology of Palaeozoic Siliciclastic Rocks from the Ellsworth Mountains, West Antarctica
    O EOL GIC G A D D A E D C E I H C I L E O S F u n 2 d 6 la serena octubre 2015 ada en 19 Detrital zircon geochronology of Palaeozoic siliciclastic rocks from the Ellsworth Mountains, West Antarctica Paula Castillo* and C. Mark Fanning Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Rodrigo Fernández University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA. Fernando Poblete Geosciences Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France. Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. *Contact email: [email protected] Abstract. In the Ellsworth Mountains there is an extensive record of sedimentation from early Cambrian to Permian times. However, the tectonic history and the palaeogeographic significance remain enigmatic. Nine sandstone samples were analysed for their U-Pb detrital zircon age spectra using SHRIMPII and RG. They belong to the early Cambrian to Carboniferous-Permian sequences and record typical Gondwana margin signatures. Variations up section/sequence in zircon provenance suggest restricted basinal deposition during the Cambrian,! with likely sources in the Namaqua-Natal and Mozambique/Maud Belts. There are little or no contributions from older cratons and so the Ellsworth basin evolved as a separate basin to that in the Transantarctic Mountains.! This basin configuration changed after the Devonian and deposition continued Figure 1. Reconstruction of part of Gondwana at ca. 500 Ma. during the late Palaeozoic, when the Ellsworth Mountains South America: SFC - Sao Francisco craton; PPC - basin only received detritus from the Ross/Pan-African Paranapanema craton; RPC - Río de la Plata craton.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rock and Fossil Record the Rock and Fossil Record the Rock And
    TheThe RockRock andand FossilFossil RecordRecord Earth’s Story and Those Who First Listened . 426 Apply . 427 Internet Connect . 428 When on Earth? . 429 Activity . 430 MathBreak . 434 Internet Connect 432, 435 Looking at Fossils . 436 QuickLab . 438 Internet Connect . 440 Time Marches On . 441 QuickLab . 443 Internet Connect . 445 Chapter Lab . 446 Chapter Review . 449 TEKS/TAKS Practice Tests . 451, 452 Feature Article . 453 Time Stands Still Pre-Reading Questions Sealed in darkness for 49 million years, this beetle still shimmers with the same metallic hues that once helped it hide among ancient plants. This rare fossil 1. How do scientists study was found in Messel, Germany. In the same rock formation, the Earth’s history? scientists have found fossilized crocodiles, bats, birds, and 2. How can you tell the age frogs. A living stag beetle (above) has a similar form and of rocks and fossils? color. Do you think that these two beetles would live in 3. What natural or human similar environments? What do you think Messel, Germany, events have caused mass was like 49 million years ago? In this chapter, you will extinctions in Earth’s learn how scientists answer these kinds of questions. history? 424 Chapter 16 Copyright © by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. All rights reserved. MAKING FOSSILS Procedure 1. You and three or four of your classmates will be given several pieces of modeling clay and a paper sack containing a few small objects. 2. Press each object firmly into a piece of clay. Try to leave an imprint showing as much detail as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Terran Cornoration Environmental Services
    Page 11 Terran Cornoration Environmental Services Mr. James Yskamp, Esq. February 1, 2018 Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services 159 South Main Street, Suite 1030 Akron, Ohio 44308 RE: Technical Report Review: "Evaluation of Groundwater Impacts, Dewatering of Proposed Enon Quarry, Clark County, Ohio " Dear Mr. Y skamp, I, Brent E. Huntsman, CPG, President and Principal Hydrogeologist ofTerran Corporation (Terran) was retained by Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services to review and comment upon the hydrogeologic characterization and predicted dewatering effects to the water resources of Mad River Township, Clark County, OH as described in a groundwater model report prepared for a mining permit modification. This report review was to include an evaluation of the aquifer response and hydraulic performance predicted by the model simulations of the groundwater system; the magnitude and extent of a cone of depression resulting from dewatering various limestone quarry pits. The purpose of my review is to provide a letter report summarizing my expert opinions regarding the adequacy of the groundwater model to appropriately simulate dewatering effects upon the local groundwater regime. All opinions in this report are based upon my review of existing information (developed through the litigation process in this case or in the public record) together with my 43-years of experience in applied hydrogeology, specifically aquifer characterization and water resources development. My current curriculum vita is included with this letter report as Attachment 2. These opinions are expressed to a reasonable degree of scientific and professional certainty. I reserve the right to supplement this report and opinions as additional material becomes available through the litigation process or continued review of public literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Time and Geologic Maps
    NAME GEOLOGIC TIME AND GEOLOGIC MAPS I. Introduction There are two types of geologic time, relative and absolute. In the case of relative time geologic events are arranged in their order of occurrence. No attempt is made to determine the actual time at which they occurred. For example, in a sequence of flat lying rocks, shale is on top of sandstone. The shale, therefore, must by younger (deposited after the sandstone), but how much younger is not known. In the case of absolute time the actual age of the geologic event is determined. This is usually done using a radiometric-dating technique. II. Relative geologic age In this section several techniques are considered for determining the relative age of geologic events. For example, four sedimentary rocks are piled-up as shown on Figure 1. A must have been deposited first and is the oldest. D must have been deposited last and is the youngest. This is an example of a general geologic law known as the Law of Superposition. This law states that in any pile of sedimentary strata that has not been disturbed by folding or overturning since accumulation, the youngest stratum is at the top and the oldest is at the base. While this may seem to be a simple observation, this principle of superposition (or stratigraphic succession) is the basis of the geologic column which lists rock units in their relative order of formation. As a second example, Figure 2 shows a sandstone that has been cut by two dikes (igneous intrusions that are tabular in shape).The sandstone, A, is the oldest rock since it is intruded by both dikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Waddle Ditch Rattlesnake Creek
    Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05) Prepared for: Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District Prepared by: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Toledo, Ohio Version 1.0 Approved: June 29, 2021 This page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements Version 1.0 prepared and written by: Deanna Bobak Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4841 Monroe Street, Suite 103 Toledo, OH 43623 Brigitte Hisey Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District 1415 US 22 SW, Suite 500 Washington Court House, OH 43160 The Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) would like to acknowledge the collaboration of multiple partners in the preparation of this Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05). The Fayette SWCD appreciates those individuals and organizations that contributed background information, insight into objectives and projects for inclusion in this NPS-IS. Thank you to Rick Wilson, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Division of Surface Water, for guidance throughout the NPS-IS development process, as well as Jessica D’Ambrosio and the staff of The Nature Conservancy for providing modeling data generated by the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). This product or publication was financed in part or totally through a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through an assistance agreement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The contents and views, including any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations, contained in this product or publication are those of the authors and have not been subject to any Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency peer or administrative review and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or the United States Environmental Protection Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee
    Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee By ROBERT C. MILICI and HELMUTH WEDOW, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Milici, Robert C 1931- Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and parts of the adjacent valley and ridge, Tennessee. (Geological Survey professional paper; 996) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:996 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Ordovician. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic--Silurian. 3. Geology--Tennessee--Sequatchie Valley. 4. Geology--Tennessee--Chattanooga region. I. Wedow, Helmuth, 1917- joint author. II: Title. Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley .... III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper; 996. QE660.M54 551.7'310976877 76-608170 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03002·1 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2011 Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States Margaret E. Walker-Milani West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Walker-Milani, Margaret E., "Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States" (2011). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 3327. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/3327 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Outcrop Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale in West Virginia and Adjacent States Margaret E. Walker-Milani THESIS submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Richard Smosna, Ph.D., Chair Timothy Carr, Ph.D. John Renton, Ph.D. Kathy Bruner, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary Report on Paleozoic Stratigraphy, Mapping and Hydrocarbon A
    Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary report on Paleozoic stratigraphy, mapping and GP2008-2 hydrocarbon assessment, southwestern Manitoba By M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Barchyn GEOSCIENTIFIC PAPER Geoscientific Paper GP2008-2 Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary report on Paleozoic stratigraphy, mapping and hydrocarbon assessment, southwestern Manitoba by M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Barchyn Winnipeg, 2008, reprinted with minor revisions January, 2009 Science, Technology, Energy and Mines Mineral Resources Division Hon. Jim Rondeau John Fox Minister Assistant Deputy Minister John Clarkson Manitoba Geological Survey Deputy Minister E.C. Syme Director ©Queen’s Printer for Manitoba, 2008, reprinted with minor revisions, January 2009 Every possible effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, but Manitoba Science, Technol- ogy, Energy and Mines does not assume any liability for errors that may occur. Source references are included in the report and users should verify critical information. Any digital data and software accompanying this publication are supplied on the understanding that they are for the sole use of the licensee, and will not be redistributed in any form, in whole or in part, to third parties. Any references to proprietary software in the documentation and/or any use of proprietary data formats in this release do not constitute endorsement by Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines of any manufacturer’s product. When using information from this publication in other publications or presentations, due acknowledgment should be given to the Manitoba Geological Survey. The following reference format is recommended: Nicolas, M.P.B, and Barchyn, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Kope Formation Disturbed
    Types and Examples of Slides Glossary – Clay-rich deposits prone to failure, – Fine-grained laminated deposits of Landslides and board Backwater deposits Lake bed clays they are best developed south of the Ohio River. They occur clay and silt laid down in lakes dammed by ice during fences tilted, monuments tilted pulled apart in terraces at the mouths of tributaries to a larger stream the Pleistocene Epoch (Ice Age). They are exceptionally Your Property colluvium - soil where glacial outwash caused a temporary lake to form. unstable, even on gentle slopes. OH tension Bedrock – Term used by engineers and geologists when Lamination – A texture in soil or rock that is made up of Study curved tree Area trunks cracks, tilted referring to the Ordovician limestones and shales that very thin (a few millimeters to a centimeter) parallel layers IN pavement underlie soil everywhere in the area. The bedrock itself (see fig. 21). The layers may reflect an annual pattern of seldom fails, and so determining the depth to bedrock is a sedimentation. KY Kope Formation tilted guard key part of any site investigation. rails and Ordovician System – The set of rock formations that utility poles Bridging – Large rock fragments that interfere with proper make up the local bedrock. It consists of limestone and trace of compaction of finer fill material. shale that was deposited in an ancient ocean between 444 scarp and 488 million years ago. Colluvium – A clay-rich deposit derived from weathering of bedrock that has moved downslope by gravity from its – Sand and gravel deposits left from the flowing CREEP Outwash place of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch
    International Geoscience Programme Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett – Kyle R. Hartshorn – Allison L. Young – Cameron E. Schwalbach – Alycia L. Stigall International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - 2018 - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Kyle R. Hartshorn Dry Dredgers, 6473 Jayfield Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, USA ([email protected]) Allison L. Young Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Cameron E. Schwalbach 1099 Clough Pike, Batavia, OH 45103, USA ([email protected]) Alycia L. Stigall Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Lab, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our thanks to the many colleagues and students who have aided us in our field work, discussions, and publications, including Chris Aucoin, Ben Dattilo, Brad Deline, Rebecca Freeman, Steve Holland, T.J. Malgieri, Pat McLaughlin, Charles Mitchell, Tim Paton, Alex Ries, Tom Schramm, and James Thomka. No less gratitude goes to the many local collectors, amateurs in name only: Jack Kallmeyer, Tom Bantel, Don Bissett, Dan Cooper, Stephen Felton, Ron Fine, Rich Fuchs, Bill Heimbrock, Jerry Rush, and dozens of other Dry Dredgers. We are also grateful to David Meyer and Arnie Miller for insightful discussions of the Cincinnatian, and to Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee Meteorite Impact Sites and Changing Perspectives on Impact Cratering
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND THE TENNESSEE METEORITE IMPACT SITES AND CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT CRATERING A dissertation submitted by Janaruth Harling Ford B.A. Cum Laude (Vanderbilt University), M. Astron. (University of Western Sydney) For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 ABSTRACT Terrestrial impact structures offer astronomers and geologists opportunities to study the impact cratering process. Tennessee has four structures of interest. Information gained over the last century and a half concerning these sites is scattered throughout astronomical, geological and other specialized scientific journals, books, and literature, some of which are elusive. Gathering and compiling this widely- spread information into one historical document benefits the scientific community in general. The Wells Creek Structure is a proven impact site, and has been referred to as the ‘syntype’ cryptoexplosion structure for the United State. It was the first impact structure in the United States in which shatter cones were identified and was probably the subject of the first detailed geological report on a cryptoexplosive structure in the United States. The Wells Creek Structure displays bilateral symmetry, and three smaller ‘craters’ lie to the north of the main Wells Creek structure along its axis of symmetry. The question remains as to whether or not these structures have a common origin with the Wells Creek structure. The Flynn Creek Structure, another proven impact site, was first mentioned as a site of disturbance in Safford’s 1869 report on the geology of Tennessee. It has been noted as the terrestrial feature that bears the closest resemblance to a typical lunar crater, even though it is the probable result of a shallow marine impact.
    [Show full text]