Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin­ Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir­ where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle­ stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter­ each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape. The relief in the prominent. The rocks of this province are closely folded broad intervening valleys ranges from 100 to 600 feet but is quartzite, slate, schist, gneiss, granite, and greenstone. generally 200 to 300 feet. VALLEY AND RIDGE PROVINCE 2 PRINCIPAL TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES The Valley and Ridge province is a belt of country 50 to 80 The Allegheny Front, generally known as Allegheny Moun­ miles wide extending from New York to Alabama in a general tain, the great eastward-facing escarpment of the Appalachian direction about S. 40° W. and bounded by the Blue Ridge on Plateaus, is the most impressive feature of these quadrangles. the southeast and the Appalachian Plateaus on the northwest. It crosses the west side of the Hollidaysburg quadrangle and This belt is characterized by broad valleys separated by high rises to a height of 3,136 feet above sea level in Blue Knob, in ridges trending parallel with the belt. These ridges, however, the southeast corner of the adjoining Ebensburg quadrangle are grouped more along the northwest half of the valley, leav­ (pi. 1). The eastern foothills of this escarpment descend to a 77" 76° ing a broader valley on the southeast side known as the valley continuous with Bald Eagle Valley on the northeast and FIGURE 1. Index map of south-central Pennsylvania and parts of Cumberland Valley in Pennsylvania and the Shenandoah with the valley of Frankstown Branch on the southwest. adjacent States. Valley or the Valley of Virginia on the southeast side of the From a point opposite Hollidaysburg through Altoona this The location of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles is shown by darker ruling (No. 327). Published folios describing other quadrangles are indicated by lighter ruling belt. In Pennsylvania the Allegheny Front, which bounds valley is known as Logan Valley. Nearly inclosed by Brush, and are listed on the back cover of this folio. the Valley and Ridge province on the west, rises from 1,000 Lock, Loop, and Short Mountains is a deep topographic a unit they are bounded by parallels 40°15' and 40°30' and to 1,500 feet above the main valley levels, but only its highest depression known as Scotch Valley. Point View knob in meridians 78° and 78°30'. Each quadrangle includes one- knobs rise much above the highest of the valley ridges. Blue the northwest corner of the Huntingdon quadrangle is another sixteenth of a "square degree" of the earth's surface, and its Knob, on the Allegheny Front, in the northern part of Bed­ striking topographic feature (pi. 2). The broad lowland area is approximately 228 square miles. These quadrangles ford County, stands 3,136 feet above sea level and 1,500 feet between Lock and Dunning Mountains on the west and form a part of the Appalachian Highlands, which extend from above the surface of Nittany Valley. (See pi. 1.) South Tussey Mountain on the east, known as Morrisons Cove (pi. 3), the Atlantic Coastal Plain on the east to the Interior Plains on Mountain, on the southeast side of the Valley and Ridge is really a somewhat offset continuation of Nittany Valley, the west and from Canada to central Alabama. province, in Franklin, Adams, and Cumberland Counties rises Centre County. Raystown Valley is the broad, undulating, APPALACHIAN HIGHLANDS 1,000 feet above the valley level. Near Big Stone Gap, Va., relatively }ow land between Tussey and Terrace Mountains, the crest of Black Mountain is 3,000 feet above the valley on marked by northeastward-trending narrow ridges and drained SUBDIVISIONS the northwest side, and in northern Tennessee Holston by Raystown Branch of the Juniata River. Southeast of Differences in topography, rocks, and geologic structure Mountain, near the northwest front of the Blue Ridge province, Raystown Valley Terrace Mountain and Sideling Hill with form the basis for a natural division of the Appalachian High­ rises nearly 3,000 feet above the valley on the southeast side. the north end of Broad Top Mountain, which together inclose lands into several parts called provinces. These are, from These features are exhibited in the profile section of Figure 2. the Great Trough Creek Valley (pi. 4), are the principal southeast to northwest, the Piedmont province, the Blue Ridge The rocks in these quadrangles, as in the entire Valley and topographic features. province, the Valley and Ridge province, and the Appalachian Ridge province, are limestone, dolomite, conglomerate, sand­ All the great ridges are caused by hard sandstones which, Plateaus. The boundaries of these provinces are shown on stone, and shale, which have been greatly disturbed by folding with the exception of that forming the summit of the Alle­ Figure 2. West of the Appalachian Plateaus are the Interior and faulting. gheny Front, are steeply inclined. The softer shales and the APPALACHIAN PLATEAUS soluble limestones have been eroded away faster than the hard sandstones, which are left in high relief. The slopes of these The Appalachian Plateaus, which are practically coextensive ridges in places are more than 20°, as for example the east with the Appalachian coal fields, are relatively high, ranging slope of Loop Mountain near the middle, where there is a from 800 feet above sea level in parts of Alabama to more than descent of 1,200 feet in half a mile. About the middle of 4,500 feet in Pocahontas County, W. Va., whence they descend the southeast slope of Lock and Dunning Mountains and the through Pennsylvania to about 2,000 feet in western New northwest slope of Tussey Mountain is a series of flat-topped York. Sandstone, conglomerate, shale, and coal beds make spurs, which are formed by another hard sandstone cropping up most of the rocks of the Appalachian Plateaus. In con­ out at that level. The coincidence of these features of relief trast with those of the Valley and Ridge province the strata of with the outcrpps of the several hard sandstone formations is the plateau province have been but slightly disturbed from clearly displayed on the geologic maps. their original horizontal attitude. A notable feature of the ridges is their parallelism, which is TOPOGRAPHY due to the geologic structure. (See pi. 5.) All the ridges are essentially hogbacks, the Allegheny Front, Dunning Mountain, The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles lie in a and some minor ridges being on the west limb and Tussey and region of mature topography. The great limestone valley Terrace Mountains- on the east limb of the great Nittany arch. between Dunning and Tussey Mountains has advanced to the (See structure sections.) Sideling Hill is a hogback on the FIGURE 2. Map of the central part of the Appalachian Highlands stage of early old age, as shown by the complete adjustment of Jacks Mountain anticline, whose crest is just east of the showing its physiographic divisions. the drainage as to both the distribution of the streams and the southeast corner of the Huntingdon quadrangle. (See pi. 6.) Low Plateaus, which are included in the Interior Plains by gradation of their beds. The stream beds are nearly free from Dunning and Tussey Mountains and Sideling Hill are sym­ the United States Geological Survey but which in the opinion rock shoals and waterfalls, and uniform slopes prevail in them. metrical, having equal slopes on their two sides, owing to the of some, of whom the writer is one, should be included in the The extremes of relief are considerable, and there is a moderate erect attitude of the rocks; the Allegheny Front and Terrace Appalachian Highlands. degree of diversity in surface forms. The dependence of Mountain are unsymmetrical, having steep slopes facing the topography upon the lithologic character and the attitude of Nittany arch and low slopes facing in the opposite directions, PIEDMONT PKOVINCE the underlying strata is abundantly and strikingly illustrated. owing to the low dip of the strata in those directions. The Piedmont province is a rolling upland 1,100 feet above The quadrangles lie almost wholly in the Valley and Ridge Several deep gaps or notches through the high ridges are sea level at the east foot of the Blue Ridge and 500 feet or less province, in the belt of ridges along its west side.
Recommended publications
  • BEAVERDAM BRANCH WATERSHED TMDL Blair and Cambria Counties
    BEAVERDAM BRANCH WATERSHED TMDL Blair and Cambria Counties Prepared for : Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection March 8, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 LOCATION ....................................................................................................................................1 SEGMENTS ADDRESSED IN THIS TMDL................................................................................ 3 CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................... 3 SECTION 303(D) LISTING PROCESS.........................................................................................4 BASIC STEPS FOR DETERMINING A TMDL........................................................................... 5 SAMPLING RATIONALE.............................................................................................................5 WATERSHED BACKGROUND...................................................................................................6 METALS METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................7 TMDL ENDPOINTS ......................................................................................................................9 TMDL ELEMENTS (WLA, LA, MOS).......................................................................................10 TMDL ALLOCATIONS SUMMARY.........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Class a Wild Trout Streams
    CLASS A WILD TROUT STREAMS STATEWIDE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS REVIEW STREAM REDESIGNATION EVALUATION Drainage Lists: A, C, D, E, F, H, I, K, L, N, O, P, Q, T WATER QUALITY MONITORING SECTION (MAB) DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS BUREAU OF POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION December 2014 INTRODUCTION The Department of Environmental Protection (Department) is required by regulation, 25 Pa. Code section 93.4b(a)(2)(ii), to consider streams for High Quality (HQ) designation when the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) submits information that a stream is a Class A Wild Trout stream based on wild trout biomass. The PFBC surveys for trout biomass using their established protocols (Weber, Green, Miko) and compares the results to the Class A Wild Trout Stream criteria listed in Table 1. The PFBC applies the Class A classification following public notice, review of comments, and approval by their Commissioners. The PFBC then submits the reports to the Department where staff conducts an independent review of the trout biomass data in the fisheries management reports for each stream. All fisheries management reports that support PFBCs final determinations included in this package were reviewed and the streams were found to qualify as HQ streams under 93.4b(a)(2)(ii). There are 50 entries representing 207 stream miles included in the recommendations table. The Department generally followed the PFBC requested stream reach delineations. Adjustments to reaches were made in some instances based on land use, confluence of tributaries, or considerations based on electronic mapping limitations. PUBLIC RESPONSE AND PARTICIPATION SUMMARY The procedure by which the PFBC designates stream segments as Class A requires a public notice process where proposed Class A sections are published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin first as proposed and secondly as final, after a review of comments received during the public comment period and approval by the PFBC Commissioners.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
    Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan December 18, 2007 Adopted by the Bedford County Board of Commissioners Prepared by the Bedford County Planning Commission With technical assistance provided by This plan was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program, Environmental Stewardship fund, under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Intentionally Blank Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................1-1 Plan Purpose and Value Planning Process Plan Overview by Chapter Setting and Study Area.........................................................................................................................2-1 Regional Setting County Characteristic and Trends Major Communities and Corridors Significant and Sizable Features Development and Conservation Policy Open Space Resources.............................................................................................................. 3-1 Sensitive Natural Resources Resources for Rural Industries Resources for Rural Character Regulation and Protection of Natural Resources Conclusions and Options Parks & Recreation Facilities ................................................................................................... 4-1 State Parks and Recreation Resources Local Public Park and Recreation Facility Assessment Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • State Game Lands 267 Blair County
    ROAD CLASSIFICATION Secondary Highway Unimproved Road ! Electric Oil Pipeline; Gas Line Other Line l Phone ll Sewer Line; Water Line ± Trail !! Special Trails Stream IA Parking Area ²³F Food & Cover Crew HQ ²³G Garage L Headquarters l ²³O Other YY ²³S Storage l Gate YY Tower Site l l Food Plot Game Land Boundary Other Game Lands Wetland ! ! ! ! ! IAl! l ! ! ! ! PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMSISSION STATE GAME LANDS 267 BLAIR COUNTY Feet 0 1900 3800 5700 7600 1 inch = 3,000 feet January 2014 Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed State game land (SGL) 267 is located in Logan Township, Blair County 12/17/2012 SPORTSMEN'S RECREATION MAP in Wildlife Management Unit 4D and currently has a deeded acreage of 1,041 acres. Approximately 2,200 feet of Laurel Run, a cold water fishery, flows through SGL 267, and all water within this SGL is part of the Susquehanna watershed. The Game Commission currently maintains one public parking area on SGL 267, located on Skyline Drive. There are 0.95 miles of maintained administrative roads throughout SGL 267, providing for public access to this area by foot. The farthest point on SGL 267 by foot from a parking area or public road is approximately 0.75 miles. All roads are currently closed year-round to public motor vehicle traffic and access is controlled with locked gates. The gated roads and rights-of-way provide access for hunters and avenues for hiking, Each time a hunter buys a hunting license, the wildlife photography and bird-watching. money he spends goes toward many facets of wildlife management.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Resource Preservation
    CHAPTER 5 RESOURCE PRESERVATION INTRODUCTION The citizens of Roanoke County have a strong desire to preserve the quality of the county’s natural, scenic and historic resources. The county’s natural features - including mountains, forests, productive soil, streams, fresh air and wildlife - serve to distinguish the greater Roanoke Valley as a uniquely attractive urban center. Roanoke County citizens recognize that the beauty of the existing natural environment attracts not only businesses and residents to our community but also tourists and sports enthusiasts. County citizens believe that it is essential to maintain the high quality of Roanoke County’s environment while accommodating the pressures for future growth and development. OPEN SPACE During the past twenty-five years, Roanoke County has experienced steady growth. From a population of 53,800 in 1970 that reflects the results of several annexations, the population grew 54 percent to 83,100 in 1995. Future population projections indicate that by the year 2010 the County population will be approximately 87,400. This growth in population and the accompanying shift in demographics - such as an aging population - are changing the traditional rural landscape of the County. New residents require more housing, schools, shopping centers, office buildings, roads, water and sewer facilities and parks and recreational services. The rural landscape is gradually becoming urbanized as a result of this growth. What was once an orchard is now a residential subdivision or a shopping center. What was once a hardwood forest is now an office building or condominium. Between 1982 and 1992 the number of farms in Roanoke County decreased 11 percent from 306 to 272.
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of the TYRONE - MOUNT Udion LINEAMENT by REMOTE SENSING TECHNIWES and Fleld NIETHQDS
    A STUDY OF THE TYRONE - MOUNT UdION LINEAMENT BY REMOTE SENSING TECHNIWES AND FlELD NIETHQDS Con- NAS 5-22822 0. P. Gold, Principal Indga@x ORSER Technical Report 12-77 Office for Ramow Sensing of Earth Resources 219 Electrical Engineering West University Park, PA 16802 Prepared for GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Greenbelt, MD 20771 The field invesrigations and much of the analvsis descrihrd in this report were used as the basis for a payer in Crology. submtttrd by Elicharl R. Cnnich to tbe Departmc~~tof ~:t~oscic-~\c~?i, in partial iu!ffllment of the rrqufrrurznts tor tlrc Mastt-r- oi Science Dcgrre. b I r T-nd- r RoonOlk I A S~~M)YOF ms ~RONR- ~\nurWIW LIN~BY December 1977 RBWTS SMSSIUC TECHNIQUS AND FlliLD t4STHWS 6 hnwym-- - r Technical Report 12-?7 J 7. habftd a -@-mQImwwn-amL David P. Gold, Principal Inwe8tigator m , 10. WRk uau Wa e m)a~~mt-#y#mdMem Office for Remote Senaing of Earth Resources 219 Electrical Bngineerin8 West Building rt. bn~nar ~nn\ &. \ The Pennsylvania State Uniwrsi ty NA!! 5-22822 University Park, PA 16802 13 ~*oro@~.om.ndhd~CI tr sponss~lr-v-nd~ddnr Final Report 11 1176-6/30/77 Caddard Space Flight Center I Crecnbelt, ND 20771 4 m.LI Field work was combined with satellite imagery and photography to study the Tyrone - Pkrunt Union lineament in Blair and Huntingdon Counties, central Pennsylvania. This feature, expressed as the valleys containing the Little Juniata and Juniata River: . transgtesscs the nose of the southwest-plunging Nittany Anticlinorium in the western extremity of the Valley ;~ndRidge Province.
    [Show full text]
  • May 13, 2006 (Pages 2271-2358)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 36 (2006) Repository 5-13-2006 May 13, 2006 (Pages 2271-2358) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2006 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "May 13, 2006 (Pages 2271-2358)" (2006). Volume 36 (2006). 19. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2006/19 This May is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 36 (2006) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 36 Number 19 Saturday, May 13, 2006 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 2271—2358 Agencies in this issue: The General Assembly The Courts Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Community and Economic Development Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Labor and Industry Department of Transportation Environmental Hearing Board Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission State Board of Pharmacy Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 378, May 2006 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents).
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020
    2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020 Tom Wolf Governor Yassmin Gramian, P.E. Secretary, PA Department of Transportation Chairperson, State Transportation Commission Larry S. Shifflet Deputy Secretary for Planning State Transportation Commission 2021 12-Year Program ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission (STC) serves as the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) board of directors. The 15 member board evaluates the condition and performance of Pennsylvania’s transportation system and assesses the resources required to maintain, improve, and expand transportation facilities and services. State Law requires PennDOT to update Pennsylvania’s 12-Year Transportation Program (TYP) every two years for submission to the STC for adoption. PAGE i www.TalkPATransportation.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION....i THE 12-YEAR PROGRAM PROCESS............................................................9 Planning and Prioritizing Projects.....................................................9 TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................ii Transportation Program Review and Approval...............................10 From Planning to Projects...............................................................11 50TH ANNIVERSARY........................................................................................1 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.............................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • March 25, 2000 (Pages 1631-1730)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 30 (2000) Repository 3-25-2000 March 25, 2000 (Pages 1631-1730) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2000 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "March 25, 2000 (Pages 1631-1730)" (2000). Volume 30 (2000). 13. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2000/13 This March is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 30 (2000) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Volume 30 Number 13 Saturday, March 25, 2000 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 1631—1730 Agencies in this issue: The Courts Department of Banking Department of Community and Economic Development Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Public Welfare Department of Revenue Department of Transportation Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 304, March 2000 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents).
    [Show full text]
  • Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER
    JJJn'IWi'li jMlIipii ill ^ANGLER/ Ran a Looks A Bulltrog SEPTEMBER 1936 7 OFFICIAL STATE September, 1936 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER Vol.5 No. 9 C'^IP-^ '" . : - ==«rs> PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS HI Five cents a copy — 50 cents a year OLIVER M. DEIBLER Commissioner of Fisheries C. R. BULLER 1 1 f Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor 111 South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MEMBERS OF BOARD OLIVER M. DEIBLER, Chairman Greensburg iii MILTON L. PEEK Devon NOTE CHARLES A. FRENCH Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER Elwood City should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either HARRY E. WEBER by check or money order payable to the Common­ Philipsburg wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL 111 Johnstown EDGAR W. NICHOLSON PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ Philadelphia tions and photos of catches from its readers. Pro­ KENNETH A. REID per credit will be given to contributors. Connellsville All contributors returned if accompanied by first H. R. STACKHOUSE class postage. Secretary to Board =*KT> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 5 No. 9 SEPTEMBER, 1936 *ANGLER7 WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT STREAM POLLUTION By GROVER C. LADNER Deputy Attorney General and President, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen PORTSMEN need not be told that stream pollution is a long uphill fight.
    [Show full text]