DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020 Tom Wolf Governor Yassmin Gramian, P.E. Secretary, PA Department of Transportation Chairperson, State Transportation Commission Larry S. Shifflet Deputy Secretary for Planning State Transportation Commission 2021 12-Year Program ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission (STC) serves as the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) board of directors. The 15 member board evaluates the condition and performance of Pennsylvania’s transportation system and assesses the resources required to maintain, improve, and expand transportation facilities and services. State Law requires PennDOT to update Pennsylvania’s 12-Year Transportation Program (TYP) every two years for submission to the STC for adoption. PAGE i www.TalkPATransportation.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION....i THE 12-YEAR PROGRAM PROCESS............................................................9 Planning and Prioritizing Projects.....................................................9 TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................ii Transportation Program Review and Approval...............................10 From Planning to Projects...............................................................11 50TH ANNIVERSARY........................................................................................1 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.............................................13 WELCOME FROM THE SECRETARY.............................................................2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION..............................................................................14 COVID-19 RESPONSE....................................................................................3 2021 TYP Outreach Process...........................................................14 TYP Update Public Comment Period..............................................15 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING IN PENNSYLVANIA.......................................4 Online Public Meeting.....................................................................15 Federal Funding...............................................................................4 Transportation Survey....................................................................15 State Funding...................................................................................4 Analyze, Summarize and Share.....................................................15 Local Funding...................................................................................4 Survey Results...............................................................................16 2021 Funding Levels........................................................................4 TAC Study, Transportation Funding Risk Report..............................5 TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT............................................................20 PENNDOT CONNECTS...................................................................................6 REAL ID.........................................................................................................21 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN PENNSYLVANIA.....................................7 STAYING ENGAGED.....................................................................................22 The 12-Year Program......................................................................7 Transportation Performance Management.......................................7 2021 12-YEAR PROGRAM LIST OF PROJECTS..........................................23 Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan....................................8 A Key to the 12-Year Program.........................................................24 Regional Long Range Transportation Plans...................................8 Table of Contents............................................................................25 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program............................8 List of Projects by MPO/RPO region...............................................26 Public Participation Plan..................................................................8 PAGE ii State Transportation Commission 2021 12-Year Program 50TH ANNIVERSARY On May 6, 1970, Pennsylvania Act 120 was enacted. This legislation established PennDOT, the STC, and the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). This extremely important piece of legislation shifted the transportation focus from highways and bridges to the safe movement of people and goods using all forms of transportation. On May 6, 2020 the 50th anniversary of Act 120 was recognized as a significant milestone for PennDOT, the STC, and TAC! PAGE 1 www.TalkPATransportation.com WELCOME FROM THE SECRETARY Hello, I’m Yassmin Gramian, Secretary for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. I’m excited to present Pennsylvania’s 2021 12-Year Transportation Program. The 12-Year Program, or TYP, is a mid-range planning tool used to identify and prioritize PA’s transportation projects and the funding necessary to complete them. “I encourage you to use the The program recognizes all types of transportation in PA including highways, bridges, public transit, aviation, rail freight, report to learn as well as bicycle and pedestrian. In addition, it highlights some of the Department’s major accomplishments over the past two years, such as PennDOT Connects and rolling out Real ID. It also describes what we are learning from the COVID-19 more about our pandemic and its impact on transportation in Pennsylvania. accomplishments, I encourage you to use the report to learn more about our accomplishments, current funding, and upcoming transportation current funding, projects near you. and upcoming transportation Thank You, projects near you. Yassmin Gramian,PE Secretary, PA Department of Transportation “ Chairperson, State Transportation Commission PAGE 2 State Transportation Commission 2021 12-Year Program COVID-19 RESPONSE Pennsylvania took quick and decisive action in the spring of 2020 to slow the spread of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and protect all Pennsylvanians. Safe and reliable transportation remained just as important, if not more so, during the crisis. As such, it was extremely important to maintain essential services while enacting procedures to limit the spread of the virus. PennDOT temporarily halted all construction projects until plans for worker safety could be developed and implemented. PennDOT also closed Driver License Centers and extended the expiration date for certain driver’s licenses, vehicle registrations, and safety and emissions inspections. Despite having never teleworked, many PennDOT employees quickly shifted to working from home when the offices closed. This included the unprecedented shift of the regional Traffic Management Centers that oversee the daily operations of Pennsylvania’s highways to remote locations. PAGE 3 www.TalkPATransportation.com TRANSPORTATION FUNDING IN PENNSYLVANIA Transportation projects listed in the TYP use a combination of federal, state, and local funding. The available amounts over the twelve years reflect anticipated financial investments based upon legislation, actual and anticipated budgets, and historical trends. Federal Funding iii. Multimodal Transportation Fund – Grants for all modes iv. Public Transportation Assistance Fund – Mass transit operating expenses and Authorization legislation determines the amount and category of federal money asset management projects distributed to states. The end of the most recent legislation, Fixing America’s Surface v. General Fund – Aviation and rail freight projects Transportation (FAST) Act on September 30, 2020 causes uncertainty for the amount of expected federal funding for highways, bridges, and public transit throughout the TYP. Overall funding at the state level is also uncertain throughout the TYP due to declining The potential bankruptcy of the Federal Highway Trust Fund (HTF) and the lingering revenue from reduced gas tax receipts, inflationary pressures, and impacts of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy only increase the uncertainty; COVID-19 pandemic. however, the 2021 TYP assumes federal funding levels will remain flat, at 2020 levels, throughout the twelve years. Local Funding Local municipalities, private entities, toll authorities, and transit operators also provide State Funding funds that are accounted for in the TYP. These funds are most often included when a The annual state budget process determines the funding amounts available for projects match is required for state or federal funds. on the TYP through allocations from several monetary sources: i. Motor License Fund – Highway, bridge and safety projects on the TYP; county 2021 Funding Levels and municipal road and bridge improvements; and Pennsylvania State Police The 2021 TYP contains over $64 billion in projects involving all modes of transportation. Operations The table on page 5 shows the distribution of funding in millions of dollars for the first ii. Public Transportation Trust Fund – Mass transit operating expenses and asset four years, the second four years, and the third four years, and the total TYP. improvements Federal Highway Trust Fund The Federal Highway Trust Fund (HTF) is composed of taxes paid at the fuel pump (18.4 cents per gallon on gasoline and 24.4 cents per gallon of diesel fuel) and other excise taxes. The money in the
Recommended publications
  • BEAVERDAM BRANCH WATERSHED TMDL Blair and Cambria Counties

    BEAVERDAM BRANCH WATERSHED TMDL Blair and Cambria Counties

    BEAVERDAM BRANCH WATERSHED TMDL Blair and Cambria Counties Prepared for : Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection March 8, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 LOCATION ....................................................................................................................................1 SEGMENTS ADDRESSED IN THIS TMDL................................................................................ 3 CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................... 3 SECTION 303(D) LISTING PROCESS.........................................................................................4 BASIC STEPS FOR DETERMINING A TMDL........................................................................... 5 SAMPLING RATIONALE.............................................................................................................5 WATERSHED BACKGROUND...................................................................................................6 METALS METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................7 TMDL ENDPOINTS ......................................................................................................................9 TMDL ELEMENTS (WLA, LA, MOS).......................................................................................10 TMDL ALLOCATIONS SUMMARY.........................................................................................10
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Annual Report - 2019

    Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Annual Report - 2019

    Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Annual Report - 2019 Prepared by: Cultural Resources Unit, Environmental Policy and Development Section, Bureau of Project Delivery, Highway Delivery Division, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Date: April 07, 2020 For the: Federal Highway Administration, Pennsylvania Division Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Officer Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Penn Street Bridge after rehabilitation, Reading, Pennsylvania Table of Contents A. Staffing Changes ................................................................................................... 7 B. Consultant Support ................................................................................................ 7 Appendix A: Exempted Projects List Appendix B: 106 Project Findings List Section 106 PA Annual Report for 2018 i Introduction The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) has been delegated certain responsibilities for ensuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106) on federally funded highway projects. This delegation authority comes from a signed Programmatic Agreement [signed in 2010 and amended in 2017] between the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and PennDOT. Stipulation X.D of the amended Programmatic Agreement (PA) requires PennDOT to prepare an annual report on activities carried out under the PA and provide it to
  • March 25, 2000 (Pages 1631-1730)

    March 25, 2000 (Pages 1631-1730)

    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 30 (2000) Repository 3-25-2000 March 25, 2000 (Pages 1631-1730) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2000 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "March 25, 2000 (Pages 1631-1730)" (2000). Volume 30 (2000). 13. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2000/13 This March is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 30 (2000) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Volume 30 Number 13 Saturday, March 25, 2000 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 1631—1730 Agencies in this issue: The Courts Department of Banking Department of Community and Economic Development Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Public Welfare Department of Revenue Department of Transportation Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Liquor Control Board Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 304, March 2000 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents).
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin

    Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin

    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
  • 2020-45 Long Range Transportation Plan

    2020-45 Long Range Transportation Plan

    2020-45 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN ADOPTED JUNE 23, 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2 Northwest Pennsylvania Commission 2020-45 Long Range Transportation Plan Prepared for: Northwest Commission 395 Seneca Street P.O. Box 1127 Oil City, PA 16301 (814) 677-4800 http://northwestpa.org/transportation/ By: Michael Baker International 4431 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 213-2900 June 23, 2020 Our Regional Geographic Position The Northwest PA region includes a 5-county area located in the northwestern corner of Pennsylvania. It is one of the state’s smallest transportation planning regions by population, yet consists of nearly 3,600 square miles of land area (or an area roughly half the size of New Jersey). The region’s location just off the shores of Lake Erie also makes it an area with one of the harshest environments in the state. The region is situated within the winter snowbelt, and annually receives upwards of 100 inches of snowfall, along with 40-48 inches of rain. PennDOT typically spends anywhere from 100 to 150 days a year de-icing the region’s roadways. Geologically, the region is located within the broader Appalachian Plateau region, with deposits of glacial till that can run more than 200 feet deep. This environmental phenomenon can substantially drive up the costs of bridge maintenance and construction, just as much as the region’s freeze and thaw cycles can adversely affect roadway conditions. The region in general is very rural, with a population density of only 64 persons per square mile. In addition, significant portions of the region are quite remote and inaccessible, with limited access to the national Interstate system.
  • Pa-Railroad-Shops-Works.Pdf

    Pa-Railroad-Shops-Works.Pdf

    [)-/ a special history study pennsylvania railroad shops and works altoona, pennsylvania f;/~: ltmen~on IndvJ·h·;4 I lferifa5e fJr4Je~i Pl.EASE RETURNTO: TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER DENVER SERVICE CE~TER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ~ CROFIL -·::1 a special history study pennsylvania railroad shops and works altoona, pennsylvania by John C. Paige may 1989 AMERICA'S INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE PROJECT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ~ CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Chapter 1 : History of the Altoona Railroad Shops 1. The Allegheny Mountains Prior to the Coming of the Pennsylvania Railroad 1 2. The Creation and Coming of the Pennsylvania Railroad 3 3. The Selection of the Townsite of Altoona 4 4. The First Pennsylvania Railroad Shops 5 5. The Development of the Altoona Railroad Shops Prior to the Civil War 7 6. The Impact of the Civil War on the Altoona Railroad Shops 9 7. The Altoona Railroad Shops After the Civil War 12 8. The Construction of the Juniata Shops 18 9. The Early 1900s and the Railroad Shops Expansion 22 1O. The Railroad Shops During and After World War I 24 11. The Impact of the Great Depression on the Railroad Shops 28 12. The Railroad Shops During World War II 33 13. Changes After World War II 35 14. The Elimination of the Older Railroad Shop Buildings in the 1960s and After 37 Chapter 2: The Products of the Altoona Railroad Shops 41 1. Railroad Cars and Iron Products from 1850 Until 1952 41 2. Locomotives from the 1860s Until the 1980s 52 3. Specialty Items 65 4.
  • COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN BLAIR for TOWNSHIP

    COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN BLAIR for TOWNSHIP

    COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN for BLAIR TOWNSHIP The preparation of the Blair Township Comprehensive Plan was financed in part through a comprehensive planning grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, under the provisions of Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended and as administered by the Bureau of Planning, Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. Contract Nos. 03-00-1113-22 July 77 - June 78 03-11-1092-22 July 76 - June 77 03-26-1083-20 July 75 - June 76 Blair County Planning Commission July, 1978 I i I BIBLIOGRAPHIC- DATA- .- 11* No- 12. 13. Recipient's Accession No. SHEET I BTCP 1303-01-78 I I 4. Title and Subtitle IS. Report Date 4Blair Township Comprehensive Plan U.S. Department of Housing 6 Urban Development Number Two, Allegheny Center Pittsburgh, PA 15212 of proposed development as well as the amount and location. 17. Key Words and Document Analysis. 170. Descriptors 17b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms Comprehensive plan Land use plan Centers concept Policies, Goals and Objectives I Environmental Steep slope Flood lain 17c. COSATI E)irld/Group 18. Availability Statement 19. Security Class (This 21. No. of Pages Report) Copies available at the Blair UNCI-ASSIFIED 123 'I County Planning Commission,Highland Hall Annex, 20. Security Class (This 22. Price Hollidaysburg, PA 16648 Page UNCLASSIFIED a-4 c5p USCOMU-OC 14952-Pi FORM NTIS-35 (REV. 3-72) THIS FORM MAY BE REPRODUCED RESOLUTION NO. '7 8 - /O I I?ESOT,UTION OF TIIE BOAR0 OF SUPERVISOI<S OF BLA R TOWNSHIP REGARDING TIIE ADOPTION OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLA --FOR I'LAIR TO\VNSIIIP ; PREPARED TN ACCORDANCE WITli THE PENI,SYJAVAhIA I I\IUNICTPALITIES PLANNTNG CODE : WHEREAS, the E.oard of Supervisors of Blair Township, having ii,structed the I Blair Township Planning Commission to study the present developmerit: trends, I physical attrilmtes (soils, geology, topography, and other 3;'nitat ons), and needs of Rlair Town::hip; and to prepare a comprehensive plan %o gu de future I growth and developmcnt it.
  • NY Excluding Long Island 2017

    NY Excluding Long Island 2017

    DISCONTINUED SURFACE-WATER DISCHARGE OR STAGE-ONLY STATIONS The following continuous-record surface-water discharge or stage-only stations (gaging stations) in eastern New York excluding Long Island have been discontinued. Daily streamflow or stage records were collected and published for the period of record, expressed in water years, shown for each station. Those stations with an asterisk (*) before the station number are currently operated as crest-stage partial-record station and those with a double asterisk (**) after the station name had revisions published after the site was discontinued. Those stations with a (‡) following the Period of Record have no winter record. [Letters after station name designate type of data collected: (d) discharge, (e) elevation, (g) gage height] Period of Station Drainage record Station name number area (mi2) (water years) HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN Tenmile River near Wassaic, NY (d) 01199420 120 1959-61 Swamp River near Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199490 46.6 1961-68 Tenmile River at Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199500 189 1901-04 BLIND BROOK BASIN Blind Brook at Rye, NY (d) 01300000 8.86 1944-89 BEAVER SWAMP BROOK BASIN Beaver Swamp Brook at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01300500 4.42 1944-89 MAMARONECK RIVER BASIN Mamaroneck River at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01301000 23.1 1944-89 BRONX RIVER BASIN Bronx River at Bronxville, NY (d) 01302000 26.5 1944-89 HUDSON RIVER BASIN Opalescent River near Tahawus, NY (d) 01311900 9.02 1921-23 Fishing Brook (County Line Flow Outlet) near Newcomb, NY (d) 0131199050 25.2 2007-10 Arbutus Pond Outlet
  • Water Resources

    Water Resources

    WATER RESOURCES Major Tributaries The French Creek watershed has ten major tributaries whose sub-basins cover at least 50 square miles (Figure 3). In addition, those major sub-basins can be broken down further into the Pennsylvania State Water Plan designated small watersheds (Figure 13). The PA portion of the main stem of French Creek is classified as a warm water fishery (WWF) by the PA Department of Environmental Protection’s Water Quality Standards (PA Title 25, Chapter 93). West Branch of French Creek The West Branch of French Creek originates in Chautauqua County, New York and flows southwest into Erie County, Pennsylvania before turning south. It joins French Creek from the right side (facing downstream), near Wattsburg, at river mile 84.42 and drains 77.7 square miles. It drains portions of Northeast, Greenfield, and Venango townships and Wattsburg Borough in Pennsylvania. The low gradient West Branch and all of its tributaries are classified as WWF. The West Branch sub-basin contains the most extensive wetlands, including rare fens, of any Pennsylvania headwater area. Although this sub-basin still contains blocks of contiguous forest and undeveloped riparian areas, it is beginning to see development pressure from the city of Erie and North East. Work by Dr. J. Stauffer, et al, Penn State University, and other historic records have documented 26 species of fish from the West Branch sub-basin (Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, 1992). These include the PA threatened mountain brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon greeleyi), and Ohio lamprey (Ichthyomyzon bdellium). According to surveys by WPC biologists, this stream also supports 13 freshwater mussel species, including a “viable population of the [former] federal candidate Epioblasma triqueta (snuffbox)” (Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, 1994).
  • Conewago Creek Watershed York and Adams Counties

    Conewago Creek Watershed York and Adams Counties

    01/09/01 INCOMPLETE DRAFT DEP Bureau of Watershed Management DO NOT COPY FOR PUBLIC Watershed Restoration Action Strategy (WRAS) State Water Plan Subbasin 07F (West) Conewago Creek Watershed York and Adams Counties Introduction The 510 square mile Subbasin 07F consists of the West Conewago Creek watershed in York and Adams Counties, which enters the west side of the Susquehanna River at York Haven. Major tributaries include Bermudian Creek, South Branch Conewago Creek, Little Conewago Creek, and Opossum Creek. A total of 903 streams flow for 1104 miles through the subbasin. The subbasin is included in HUC Area 2050306, Lower Susquehanna River a Category I, FY99/2000 Priority watershed in the Unified Watershed Assessment. Geology/Soils The geology of the subbasin is complex. The majority of the watershed is in the Northern Piedmont Ecoregion. The Triassic Lowlands (64a) consisting of sandstone, red shale, and siltstone of the Gettysburg and New Oxford Formations are interspersed throughout the watershed with the Diabase and Conglomerate Uplands (64b) consisting of Triassic/Jurassic diabase and argillite. 64a is an area of low rolling terrain with broad valleys and isolated hills. The soils derived from these rocks are generally less fertile than those derived from Piedmont limestone rocks but are more fertile than those derived from Piedmont igneous and metamorphic rocks. The sandstone and shale of the Gettysburg and New Oxford Formations are poorly cemented and have good porosity and permeability. These soils generally have moderate to high infiltration rates and yield a good supply of groundwater. The red Triassic sandstone is quarried for use as brick and stone building blocks.
  • An Overall Pian for the Development and Preservation of the City of Mooha, Pennsylvania

    An Overall Pian for the Development and Preservation of the City of Mooha, Pennsylvania

    An Overall Pian for the Development and Preservation of the City of Mooha, Pennsylvania Prepzred Under the Direction of the City of Altoona Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee and Staff of the City of Altoona Depaitmsnt of Planning and Development Adopted by Resolution or' Altoona City CounciI on August 9, 2gOo. Cornm u n it4 Plann i r ia Cons u I t a nt [Jrban Research and Devetoprneilt Corporation Bothle hem, Penns y lva tiia CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................... 1 Great Things Are Happening ................................................... 1 AltoonaWithintheRegion .................................................... 2 I Altoona’sRichHeritage ....................................................... 3 I How This Plan Was Developed ................................................. 4 1 c Initial Public Input ................................................................ 5 Community-Wide Survey ..................................................... 5 Neighborhood Workshops ..................................................... 6 I Results of Focus Group Interviews .............................................. 9 Mission Statement .......................................................... 11 Direction: The Major Goals of this Plan ......................................... 11 I Relationships Between the Components of this Plan ............................... 13 I Land Use and Housing Plan ....................................................... 15 L Economic Development and Downtown Plan