DOCSLIB.ORG

Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Dead Creek and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Minor Tribs to Lake Champlain total length of selected tribs, Main Lake South Housington Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Beaver Brook, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs above D&H railroad crossing Bartlett Brook, Upper, and minor tribs stream and selected tribs abv Pt Henry water supply dam Mill Brook Tributary stream and tribs above Mineville water supply dam Page 2 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Basin Segment Miles 6NYCRR Chapter X Part Allegheny River 59.03 800 Allegheny River 51.82 800 Black River 13.19 805 Allegheny River 37.46 802 Black River 18.28 805 Black River 4.48 805 Black River 12.45 805 Black River 47.04 805 Black River 48.5 805 Black River 46.85 805 Black River 9.83 805 Black River 57.36 805 Lake Champlain 18.29 830 Lake Champlain 36.24 830 Lake Champlain 85.69 830 Lake Champlain 85.06 830 Lake Champlain 18.09 830 Lake Champlain 11.13 830 Lake Champlain 12.87 830 Lake Champlain 4.03 830 Page 3 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Water Quality Class C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) AA(TS) C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) D C C(T) C(T) AA(T) AA(T) AA(T) Page 4 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Streams 1002-0001 C- 3 (portion 2) Streams 1002-0003 C- 4 Streams 1002-0008 C- 4 Streams 1002-0010 C- 3 (portion 1) Streams 1002-0011 C- 3- 1 thru 22 (selected) Streams 1002-0012 C- 3- 2 Streams 1002-0013 C- 3-25 Streams 1002-0014 C- 3-25 Streams 1002-0016 C- 3-25- 5 Streams 1002-0017 C- 3 (portion 3) Streams 1002-0018 C- 3 (portion 5) Streams 1002-0020 C- 3-35 Streams 1002-0021 C- 3-P20- Streams 1002-0023 C- 1 thru 2 (selected) Streams 1003-0001 C- 15 (portion 2) Streams 1003-0021 C- 15 (portion 3) Streams 1003-0038 C- 15-22 Streams 1003-0041 C- 15-22 Streams 1003-0044 C- 15 (portion 6) Streams 1003-0049 C- 15 (portion 1) Streams 1003-0051 C- 15- 5, 5-3 Streams 1003-0052 C- 15- 1 thru 10 Page 5 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Great Chazy River, Lower, Main Stem river from Champlain waterworks dam to North Branch Little Chazy River, Lower, and tribs stream and tribs from mouth to West Chazy Little Chazy River, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs above West Chazy Great Chazy River, Lower, Main Stem river from mouth to Champlain waterworks dam Minor Tribs to Great Chazy River, Lower total length of selected tribs, fr mouth to North Br Corbeau Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs North Branch, Lower, and minor tribs stream and selected tribs from mouth to Ellenburg Depot North Branch, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs above Ellenburg Depot Graves Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Great Chazy River, Middle, and tribs stream and tribs from North Branch to Miner Lake Great Chazy River, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs from Miner Lake to Chazy Lake Stillwater Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Chazy Lake total length of selected tribs Minor Tribs to Lake Champlain total length of selected tribs, Main Lake North Saranac River, Lower, Main Stem river from Woods Mills to Plattsburgh Town Line Saranac River, Middle, Main Stem river from near Plattsburgh Town Line to Union Falls North Branch Saranac, Lower, minor tribs stream and selected tribs from mouth to Mud Lake North Branch Saranac, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs above Mud Lake Saranac River, Upper, Main Stem river from Franklin Falls Pond to Saranac Lake Saranac River, Lower, Main Stem river from mouth the Woods Mills Mead/Sandburn Brooks, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs above Mead/Patterson Reservoirs Minor Tribs to Saranac River, Lower total length of selected tribs, fr mouth to Woods Mills Page 6 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Lake Champlain 18.87 830 Lake Champlain 55.34 830 Lake Champlain 63.21 830 Lake Champlain 8.45 830 Lake Champlain 158.55 830 Lake Champlain 62.24 830 Lake Champlain 104.36 830 Lake Champlain 109.27 830 Lake Champlain 43.31 830 Lake Champlain 53.2 830 Lake Champlain 82.9 830 Lake Champlain 33.89 830 Lake Champlain 43.8 830 Lake Champlain 12.43 830 Lake Champlain 5.06 830 Lake Champlain 19.44 830 Lake Champlain 120.14 830 Lake Champlain 26.82 830 Lake Champlain 35.52 830 Lake Champlain 15.23 830 Lake Champlain 32.76 830 Lake Champlain 55.59 830 Page 7 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications A C C(T) C D D C(T) C(T) C(T) C C(T) C(T) AA(T) D A C(T) C(T) C(T) C C(T) A D Page 8 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Streams 1003-0053 C- 15- 11 thru 30 (selected) Streams 1003-0055 C- 15-18 Streams 1003-0056 C- 15-22- 3 Streams 1003-0070 C- 15-51 Streams 1003-0071 C- 15-31 thru 47 (selected) Streams 1003-0074 C- 15-P 86-P 90-60 Streams 1003-0077 C- 15-P 86-P 90-65 Streams 1003-0082 C- 15-P104-66 thru 74 Streams 1003-0087 C- 15-P114- 1 thru 15 Streams 1003-0116 C- 15-12-3 Streams 1003-0117 C- 15-19 Streams 1003-0118 C- 15-54 Streams 1003-0121 C- 15-P110- 1 thru 8 Streams 1004-0010 C- 21 Streams 1004-0013 C- 25-26 Streams 1004-0014 C- 25-27 Streams 1004-0015 C- 25 Streams 1004-0018 C- 23 Streams 1004-0019 C- 16 thru 56 (selected) Streams 1004-0020 C- 25 Streams 1004-0021 C- 23 Page 9 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Minor Tribs to Middle Saranac River total length of selected tribs, Elsinore to Union Falls True Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Cold Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Towbridge Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Saranac River, Upper total length of selected tribs, above Franklin Falls Pd Ray Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Cold Brook and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Lower Saranac Lake total length of all tribs Tribs to Upper Saranac Lake total length of all tribs Behan Brook, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs above Dannemora Water Supply dam Mud Pond Brook, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs above Redford Water Supply dam Moose Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Middle Saranac Lake total length of all tribs Salmon River, Lower, and tribs stream and tribs from mouth to Davis Lake West Br Ausable, Middle, and tribs stream and tribs from Wilmington to Lake Placid East Br Ausable, Lower, and minor tribs stream and selected tribs from mouth to Upper Jay Ausable River, Lower, and minor tribs stream and selected tribs from mouth to Ausable Chasm Little Ausable River, Lower, and tribs stream and tribs from mouth to dam in Peru Minor Tribs to Lake Champlain total length of selected tribs, Main Lake Middle Ausable River, Upper, and minor tribs stream and selected tribs, abv Ausable Chasm to E/W Br Little Ausable River, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs above dam in Peru Page 10 of464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Lake Champlain 101.62 830 Lake Champlain 55.42 830 Lake Champlain 35.41 830 Lake Champlain 61.84 830 Lake Champlain 51.34 830 Lake Champlain 20.76 830 Lake Champlain 31.28 830 Lake Champlain 20.41 830 Lake Champlain 42.26 910 Lake Champlain 0.01 830 Lake Champlain 5.22 830 Lake Champlain 13.51 830 Lake Champlain 6.16 830 Lake Champlain 75.62 830 Lake Champlain 65.02 830 Lake Champlain 50.47 830 Lake Champlain 41.1 830 Lake Champlain 57.6 830 Lake Champlain 84.06 830 Lake Champlain 74.24 830 Lake Champlain 86.33 830 Page 11 of464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) AA(T) AA AA A(T) A(T) AA C(T) C(T) C(T) C(T) C C C A(T) Page 12 of464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Streams 1004-0028 C- 25-26-35 Streams 1004-0036 C- 48- 6 Streams 1004-0037 C- 48 Streams 1004-0039 C- 48 Streams 1004-0040 C- 48-34 Streams 1004-0042 C- 25-26 Streams 1004-0047
Recommended publications
  • Chautauqua County

    Chautauqua County

    CHAUTAUQUA Greenway Plan COUNTY April 2012 A four season destination for outdoor active living, nurtured by public/private partnerships. Prepared by Pashek Associates in cooperation with Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development “It is a wholesome and necessary thing for us to turn again to the earth and in the contemplation of her beauties to know of wonder and humility. - Rachel Carson” Photo Credit: Mark Geise All of the photographs in this document were taken at various locations throughout Chautauqua County. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special thank you goes out to the citizens and organizations of Chautauqua County for their enthusiasm and input during this study. Also, the time commitment, wealth of knowledge, decision-making ability, and dedication of the following individuals made the Chautauqua County Greenway Plan possible. Chautauqua County Gregory J. Edwards ........................................................... County Executive Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development William Daly ...................................................................................... Director Mark Geise ........................................................................... Deputy Director Christine Kinn .........................................................................Senior Planner Don McCord ............................................................................Senior Planner Jeffrey Diers .............................................................Watershed Coordinator Debbie Liliestedt
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12

    Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12

    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
  • Greene County Open Space and Recreation Plan

    Greene County Open Space and Recreation Plan

    GREENE COUNTY OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN PHASE I INVENTORY, DATA COLLECTION, SURVEY AND PUBLIC COMMENT DECEMBER 2002 A Publication of the Greene County Planning Department Funded in Part by a West of Hudson Master Planning and Zoning Incentive Award From the New York State Department of State Greene County Planning Department 909 Greene County Office Building, Cairo, New York 12413-9509 Phone: (518) 622-3251 Fax: (518) 622-9437 E-mail: [email protected] GREENE COUNTY OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN - PHASE I INVENTORY, DATA COLLECTION, SURVEY AND PUBLIC COMMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 II. Natural Resources ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 A. Bedrock Geology ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 1. Geological History ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 2. Overburden …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 3. Major Bedrock Groups …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 B. Soils ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 1. Soil Rating …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 2. Depth to Bedrock ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 3. Suitability for Septic Systems ……………………………………………………………………………………… 8 4. Limitations to Community Development ………………………………………………………………… 8 C. Topography …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 D. Slope …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 E. Erosion and Sedimentation ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 F. Aquifers ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Annual Report - 2019

    Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Annual Report - 2019

    Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Annual Report - 2019 Prepared by: Cultural Resources Unit, Environmental Policy and Development Section, Bureau of Project Delivery, Highway Delivery Division, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Date: April 07, 2020 For the: Federal Highway Administration, Pennsylvania Division Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Officer Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Penn Street Bridge after rehabilitation, Reading, Pennsylvania Table of Contents A. Staffing Changes ................................................................................................... 7 B. Consultant Support ................................................................................................ 7 Appendix A: Exempted Projects List Appendix B: 106 Project Findings List Section 106 PA Annual Report for 2018 i Introduction The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) has been delegated certain responsibilities for ensuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106) on federally funded highway projects. This delegation authority comes from a signed Programmatic Agreement [signed in 2010 and amended in 2017] between the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and PennDOT. Stipulation X.D of the amended Programmatic Agreement (PA) requires PennDOT to prepare an annual report on activities carried out under the PA and provide it to
  • Wetland Jurisdictional Determination Report

    Wetland Jurisdictional Determination Report

    Case 10-T-0139 Hearing Exhibit 17 Page 1 of 38 WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT Champlain Hudson Power Express Project Albany, Saratoga, Schenectady, New York, Washington, and Westchester Counties, New York Prepared for: Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc. Toronto, Ontario Prepared by: TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Wannalancit Mills 650 Suffolk St Lowell, MA 01854 March 2010 Case 10-T-0139 Hearing Exhibit 17 Page 2 of 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................1 3.0 WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY .........................................................2 4.0 WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS ........................................................................4 4.1 Vegetation..............................................................................................................17 4.2 Hydrology ..............................................................................................................19 4.3 Soils........................................................................................................................20 4.4 Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil Series Descriptions.........................20 5.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................32 TABLES Table 4-1 Summary of Wetlands Within the Study Area ........................................................5
  • Chautauqua County & Perry's Victory

    Chautauqua County & Perry's Victory

    1936 CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY AND PERRY'S VICTORY SEPT. 10, 1813. To fully realize the importance of Perry's Victory on Lake Erie we must first attempt to get a mental photo ofconditions in our county and at Presque Isle (now Erie) from about 1679 down to and mcluding September 10, 1813. This I will cover briefly. The colonial settlers along the Eastern seaboard and the GulfofMexico discovered and maped the water courses ofthis country as the only logical means oftransportation and the only pracllcallmes ofcommunication for the development ofthe interior. Along the great Lakes transportation was blocked on the west by Niagara Falls unless a route to Lake Erie by water could be established by a short over-land portage from the headwaters ofthe Allegheny River COPYRIGHT leading to the OhIO and Mississippi Rivers. Detroit, at the westerly end of Lake Erie, was also an early established trading center in the belief that the location was convenient for transportation over land and to the Mississippi River Also Detroit was excellently located for trading with the Indians along Lakes Huron CHAUTAUQUAand Superior. We have now the picture ofthe most important trading points and routes open for communication pnor to 1825 when the Erie Canal was completed. namely- Lewiston: Barcelona' Presque Isle and Detroit. In 1679 LaSalle, on a Lake Erie trip, first saw the Chautauqua area from a boat, and m 1681 or 82 he Journeyed west from OnondagaCOUNTYCounty, and after about fifteen days traveling "came to a little lake SIX or seven miles south of Lake Erie." This was believed to be Chautauqua Lake from a short notation of his in a report whichHISTORICALhe made to his government.
  • NENHC 2008 Abstracts

    NENHC 2008 Abstracts

    Abstracts APRIL 17 – APRIL 18, 2008 A FORUM FOR CURRENT RESEARCH The Northeastern Naturalist The New York State Museum is a program of The University of the State of New York/The State Education Department APRIL 17 – APRIL 18, 2008 A FORUM FOR CURRENT RESEARCH SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR CITING ABSTRACTS: Abstracts Northeast Natural History Conference X. N.Y. State Mus. Circ. 71: page number(s). 2008. ISBN: 1-55557-246-4 The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ALBANY, NY 12230 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University ROBERT M. BENNETT, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. ................................................................. Tonawanda MERRYL H. TISCH, Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ................................................. New York SAUL B. COHEN, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.................................................................................. New Rochelle JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. .................................................................. Peru ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. ..................................................................................... Syracuse GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ................................................................... Belle Harbor ARNOLD B. GARDNER, B.A., LL.B. .................................................................................. Buffalo HARRY PHILLIPS, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. ............................................................................. Hartsdale JOSEPH E. BOWMAN, JR., B.A.,
  • 2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020

    2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020

    2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020 Tom Wolf Governor Yassmin Gramian, P.E. Secretary, PA Department of Transportation Chairperson, State Transportation Commission Larry S. Shifflet Deputy Secretary for Planning State Transportation Commission 2021 12-Year Program ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission (STC) serves as the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) board of directors. The 15 member board evaluates the condition and performance of Pennsylvania’s transportation system and assesses the resources required to maintain, improve, and expand transportation facilities and services. State Law requires PennDOT to update Pennsylvania’s 12-Year Transportation Program (TYP) every two years for submission to the STC for adoption. PAGE i www.TalkPATransportation.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION....i THE 12-YEAR PROGRAM PROCESS............................................................9 Planning and Prioritizing Projects.....................................................9 TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................ii Transportation Program Review and Approval...............................10 From Planning to Projects...............................................................11 50TH ANNIVERSARY........................................................................................1 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.............................................13
  • Wetlands of Saratoga County New York

    Wetlands of Saratoga County New York

    Acknowledgments THIS BOOKLET I S THE PRODUCT Of THE work of many individuals. Although it is based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), tlus booklet would not have been produced without the support and cooperation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Patrick Pergola served as project coordinator for the wetlands inventory and Dan Montella was project coordinator for the preparation of this booklet. Ralph Tiner coordi­ nated the effort for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Data compiled from the NWI serve as the foun­ dation for much of this report. Information on the wetland status for this area is the result of hard work by photointerpreters, mainly Irene Huber (University of Massachusetts) with assistance from D avid Foulis and Todd Nuerminger. Glenn Smith (FWS) provided quality control of the interpreted aerial photographs and draft maps and collected field data on wetland communities. Tim Post (N.Y. State D epartment of Environmental Conservation), John Swords (FWS), James Schaberl and Chris Martin (National Park Ser­ vice) assisted in the field and the review of draft maps. Among other FWS staff contributing to this effort were Kurt Snider, Greg Pipkin, Kevin Bon, Becky Stanley, and Matt Starr. The booklet was reviewed by several people including Kathleen Drake (EPA), G eorge H odgson (Saratoga County Environmental Management Council), John Hamilton (Soil and W ater Conserva­ tion District), Dan Spada (Adirondack Park Agency), Pat Riexinger (N.Y. State Department of Environ­ mental Conservation), Susan Essig (FWS), and Jen­ nifer Brady-Connor (Association of State Wetland Nlanagers).
  • Connect Mid-Hudson Regional Transit Study

    Connect Mid-Hudson Regional Transit Study

    CONNECT MID-HUDSON Transit Study Final Report | January 2021 1 2 CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Service Overview ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. COVID-19 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Public Survey ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2.1. Dutchess County ............................................................................................................................................10 2.2.2. Orange County ................................................................................................................................................11 2.2.3. Ulster County ..................................................................................................................................................11 3. Transit Market Assessment and Gaps Analsysis ..................................................................................................................12 3.1. Population Density .....................................................................................................................................................12
  • NY Excluding Long Island 2017

    NY Excluding Long Island 2017

    DISCONTINUED SURFACE-WATER DISCHARGE OR STAGE-ONLY STATIONS The following continuous-record surface-water discharge or stage-only stations (gaging stations) in eastern New York excluding Long Island have been discontinued. Daily streamflow or stage records were collected and published for the period of record, expressed in water years, shown for each station. Those stations with an asterisk (*) before the station number are currently operated as crest-stage partial-record station and those with a double asterisk (**) after the station name had revisions published after the site was discontinued. Those stations with a (‡) following the Period of Record have no winter record. [Letters after station name designate type of data collected: (d) discharge, (e) elevation, (g) gage height] Period of Station Drainage record Station name number area (mi2) (water years) HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN Tenmile River near Wassaic, NY (d) 01199420 120 1959-61 Swamp River near Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199490 46.6 1961-68 Tenmile River at Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199500 189 1901-04 BLIND BROOK BASIN Blind Brook at Rye, NY (d) 01300000 8.86 1944-89 BEAVER SWAMP BROOK BASIN Beaver Swamp Brook at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01300500 4.42 1944-89 MAMARONECK RIVER BASIN Mamaroneck River at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01301000 23.1 1944-89 BRONX RIVER BASIN Bronx River at Bronxville, NY (d) 01302000 26.5 1944-89 HUDSON RIVER BASIN Opalescent River near Tahawus, NY (d) 01311900 9.02 1921-23 Fishing Brook (County Line Flow Outlet) near Newcomb, NY (d) 0131199050 25.2 2007-10 Arbutus Pond Outlet