DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 Nutrients and Suspended Sediment in the Susquehanna River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 Nutrients and Suspended Sediment in the Susquehanna River Basin 2015 NUTRIENTS AND SUSPENDED SEDIMENT IN THE SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN Publication No. 313 May 18, 2017 Kevin H. McGonigal Environmental Scientist James P. Shallenberger Manager, Monitoring & Protection Program This report is prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Quality Protection, Division of Conservation Districts and Nutrient Management, under Grant ME4100064572. Basil Seggos, New York Commissioner James M. Tierney, New York Alternate Paul D’Amato, New York Alternate Scott Foti, New York Alternate Patrick McDonnell, Pennsylvania Commissioner Dana Aunkst, Pennsylvania Alternate Jennifer Orr, Pennsylvania Alternate Ben Grumbles, Maryland Commissioner Saeid Kasraei, Maryland Alternate Virginia Kearney, Maryland Alternate Brig. General William H. Graham, U.S. Commissioner Colonel Edward P. Chamberlayne, U.S. Alternate David J. Leach, U.S. Alternate Amy M. Guise, U.S. Alternate Andrew D. Dehoff, P.E., Executive Director The Susquehanna River Basin Commission was created as an independent agency by a federal-interstate compact* among the states of Maryland and New York, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the federal government. In creating the Commission, the Congress and state legislatures formally recognized the water resources of the Susquehanna River Basin as a regional asset vested with local, state, and national interests for which all the parties share responsibility. As the single federal-interstate water resources agency with basinwide authority, the Commission's goal is to coordinate the planning, conservation, management, utilization, development, and control of Basin water resources among the public and private sectors. *Statutory Citations: Federal - Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 (December 1970); Maryland - Natural Resources Sec. 8-301 (Michie 1974); New York - ECL Sec. 21-1301 (McKinney 1973); and Pennsylvania - 32 P.S. 820.1 (Supp. 1976). This report is available on our web site (www.srbc.net) by selecting Public Information/Technical Reports. For a CD or hard copy, contact the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, Pa. 17110- 1788, Phone: (717) 238-0423, Fax: (717) 238-2436, E-mail: [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 1 KEY FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................... 2 WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION .............................................................................................................. 8 LABORATORY ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 9 HYDROLOGIC DATA: PRECIPITATION .............................................................................................. 10 HYDROLOGIC DATA: DISCHARGE (FLOW) ...................................................................................... 11 2015 PRECIPITATION AND DISCHARGE ............................................................................................ 11 DATA REDUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 12 Concentrations, Estimated Loads, and Estimated Yields .................................................................. 13 Long-Term Mean Ratio ..................................................................................................................... 14 Distributed Targets ............................................................................................................................ 15 Trends ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Adjustments for Flow and Season ..................................................................................................... 17 Colorized Heat Charts ....................................................................................................................... 18 2015 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 23 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................. 24 DISTRIBUTED LOADS ............................................................................................................................ 34 KEY POLLUTANT: SUSPENDED SEDIMENT ..................................................................................... 38 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 40 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 42 FIGURES Figure 1. Locations of Sampling Sites Within the Susquehanna River Basin ...................................... 6 Figure 2. Conceptual Storm Hydrograph and Group A and Group B Storm Sampling Targets .......... 8 Figure 3. Precipitation and Average Daily Flow (ADF) Seasonal and Annual Statistics for 2015 and the Approximately 30-year Long-term Mean for Group A NTN Monitoring Stations in the Susquehanna River Basin .................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4. Comparison of Total Nitrogen Yield (left) and Load (right) for the Marietta and Conestoga Stations ................................................................................................................................ 14 Figure 5. 2015 Annual Pollutant Loads and Discharge for Group A NTN Monitoring Stations as Fractions of the Long-Term Mean ...................................................................................... 15 Figure 6. Annual and Mean Discharge Susquehanna River at Marietta in Cubic Feet/Second (cfs) . 24 Figure 7. Peak Discharge Susquehanna River at Marietta in Cubic Feet/Second (cfs) ...................... 24 Figure 8. Annual Pollutant Loads and Peak Annual ADF in Chronological Order from 1999 to 2015 for Marietta Station .............................................................................................................. 25 Figure 9. 2015 and LTM TN, TP, and SS Yields at All Sites in Pounds Per Acre ............................. 29 Figure 10. Long-term FNC and FNF Trend Directions at Group A Sites ............................................ 32 Figure 11. Short-term FNC and FNF Trend Directions at All Sites ..................................................... 33 Figure 12. 2015 and LTM TN, TP, and SS Yields and 2025 Targets at All Sites in Pounds Per Acre 36 Figure 13. Small Tributary Monitoring Locations ................................................................................ 40 i TABLES Table 1. Data Collection Sites and Their Drainage Areas and 2000 Land Use Percentages ............... 7 Table 2. Water Quality Parameters, Laboratory Methods, and Detection Limits ............................. 10 Table 3. TN, TP, and SS loads (1000’s of pounds) at Towanda, Danville, and Marietta ................. 15 Table 4. 2017 and 2025 Loads (1000’s of lbs) and Yield (lb/ac) Targets, (BayTas 2.0) for the Susquehanna River Basin .................................................................................................... 16 Table 5. Heat Chart of TN When All Group A sites, Except Conestoga, Are Colorized Together .. 19 Table 6. Heat Chart of TN When All Group A sites, Except Conestoga, Are Colorized Together .. 20 Table 7. Heat Chart of TN When All Group A sites, Except Conestoga, Are Colorized Together .. 21 Table 8. Heat Chart of TN When All Group A sites, Except Conestoga, Are Colorized Together .. 22 Table 9. Heat Chart of TN When All Group A sites, Except Conestoga, Are Colorized Together .. 23 Table 10. Loads of TN, TP, and SS during Two Four-Year Low Flow Periods at Marietta ............... 25 Table 11. Suspended Sediment Loads at Susquehanna River Sites .................................................... 26 Table 12. SS Colorized Heat Chart at Danville ................................................................................... 27 Table 13. Select Monthly Discharge and Load Ratios ........................................................................ 28 Table 14. Flow, TN, TP, and SS Loads (1000’s of pounds) for 2015 and Similar Flow Years .......... 28 Table 15. Monthly Precipitation, Flow, and Suspended Sediment Loads at Marietta......................... 30 Table 16. Short-term Flow Normalized Trend Percent Change at All Sites by Subbasin ................... 31 Table 17. 2015 10-year Average, and 2025 Distributed Loads (1000’s of lbs) for all Sites ............... 35 Table 18. Annual Reductions Needed (1000’s of Pounds) to Attain 2025 Target Levels at All Sites 37 Table 19. Monthly Reductions Needed (1000’s of Pounds) to Attain 2025 Target Levels at Group A Mainstem Susquehanna ....................................................................................................... 37 Table 20. Monthly Reductions Needed (1000’s of Pounds) to Attain 2025 Target
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Annual Report - 2019
    Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Annual Report - 2019 Prepared by: Cultural Resources Unit, Environmental Policy and Development Section, Bureau of Project Delivery, Highway Delivery Division, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Date: April 07, 2020 For the: Federal Highway Administration, Pennsylvania Division Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Officer Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Penn Street Bridge after rehabilitation, Reading, Pennsylvania Table of Contents A. Staffing Changes ................................................................................................... 7 B. Consultant Support ................................................................................................ 7 Appendix A: Exempted Projects List Appendix B: 106 Project Findings List Section 106 PA Annual Report for 2018 i Introduction The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) has been delegated certain responsibilities for ensuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106) on federally funded highway projects. This delegation authority comes from a signed Programmatic Agreement [signed in 2010 and amended in 2017] between the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and PennDOT. Stipulation X.D of the amended Programmatic Agreement (PA) requires PennDOT to prepare an annual report on activities carried out under the PA and provide it to
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020
    2021 State Transportation 12-YEAR PROGRAM Commission AUGUST 2020 Tom Wolf Governor Yassmin Gramian, P.E. Secretary, PA Department of Transportation Chairperson, State Transportation Commission Larry S. Shifflet Deputy Secretary for Planning State Transportation Commission 2021 12-Year Program ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission (STC) serves as the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s (PennDOT) board of directors. The 15 member board evaluates the condition and performance of Pennsylvania’s transportation system and assesses the resources required to maintain, improve, and expand transportation facilities and services. State Law requires PennDOT to update Pennsylvania’s 12-Year Transportation Program (TYP) every two years for submission to the STC for adoption. PAGE i www.TalkPATransportation.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION....i THE 12-YEAR PROGRAM PROCESS............................................................9 Planning and Prioritizing Projects.....................................................9 TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................ii Transportation Program Review and Approval...............................10 From Planning to Projects...............................................................11 50TH ANNIVERSARY........................................................................................1 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.............................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • NY Excluding Long Island 2017
    DISCONTINUED SURFACE-WATER DISCHARGE OR STAGE-ONLY STATIONS The following continuous-record surface-water discharge or stage-only stations (gaging stations) in eastern New York excluding Long Island have been discontinued. Daily streamflow or stage records were collected and published for the period of record, expressed in water years, shown for each station. Those stations with an asterisk (*) before the station number are currently operated as crest-stage partial-record station and those with a double asterisk (**) after the station name had revisions published after the site was discontinued. Those stations with a (‡) following the Period of Record have no winter record. [Letters after station name designate type of data collected: (d) discharge, (e) elevation, (g) gage height] Period of Station Drainage record Station name number area (mi2) (water years) HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN Tenmile River near Wassaic, NY (d) 01199420 120 1959-61 Swamp River near Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199490 46.6 1961-68 Tenmile River at Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199500 189 1901-04 BLIND BROOK BASIN Blind Brook at Rye, NY (d) 01300000 8.86 1944-89 BEAVER SWAMP BROOK BASIN Beaver Swamp Brook at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01300500 4.42 1944-89 MAMARONECK RIVER BASIN Mamaroneck River at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01301000 23.1 1944-89 BRONX RIVER BASIN Bronx River at Bronxville, NY (d) 01302000 26.5 1944-89 HUDSON RIVER BASIN Opalescent River near Tahawus, NY (d) 01311900 9.02 1921-23 Fishing Brook (County Line Flow Outlet) near Newcomb, NY (d) 0131199050 25.2 2007-10 Arbutus Pond Outlet
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications
    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the Stratified-Drift Aquifers in the Cayuta Creek and Catatonk Creek Valleys in Parts of Tompkins, Schuyler, Chemung, and Tioga Counties, New York
    Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Hydrogeology of the Stratified-Drift Aquifers in the Cayuta Creek and Catatonk Creek Valleys in Parts of Tompkins, Schuyler, Chemung, and Tioga Counties, New York Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5127 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Upper left—U.S. Geological Survey long-term monitoring well TI 891 (site number 421213076313301) near Spencer, New York Lower Right—A typical field set up of a horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) ambient-noise seismic survey. Hydrogeology of the Stratified-Drift Aquifers in the Cayuta Creek and Catatonk Creek Valleys in Parts of Tompkins, Schuyler, Chemung, and Tioga Counties, New York By Todd S. Miller and Lacey M. Pitman Prepared in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5127 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Streams Assessment 2004-2005 Report
    ASSESSMENT OF INTERSTATE STREAMS IN THE SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN Monitoring Report No. 19 July 1, 2004, Through June 30, 2005 Publication 244 August 30, 2006 Prepared by Luanne Y. Steffy Biologist Darryl L. Sitlinger Water Quality Technician Watershed Assessment and Protection Division Susquehanna River Basin Commission Printed on recycled paper This report is prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. I-003991-04. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION Paul O. Swartz, Executive Director Denise Sheehan, Commissioner Kenneth P. Lynch, NY Alternate Scott J. Foti, NY Alternate/Advisor Kathleen A. McGinty, PA Commissioner Cathleen C. Myers, PA Alternate William A. Gast, PA Alternate/Advisor Kendl P. Philbrick, MD Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Summers, MD Alternate Matthew G. Pajerowski, MD Alternate/Advisor Major General William T. Grisoli, U.S. Commissioner Col. Peter W. Mueller, U.S. Alternate Col. Christopher J. Larsen, U.S. Alternate Lloyd C. Caldwell, U.S. Advisor Amy M. Guise, U.S. Advisor The Susquehanna River Basin Commission was created as an independent agency by a federal-interstate compact* among the states of Maryland, New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the federal government. In creating the Commission, the Congress and state legislatures formally recognized the water resources of the Susquehanna River Basin as a regional asset vested with local, state, and national interests for which all the parties share responsibility. As the single federal-interstate water resources agency with basinwide authority, the Commission's goal is to coordinate the planning, conservation, management, utilization, development and control of basin water resources among the public and private sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • April 28, 2007 (Pages 1949-2082)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 37 (2007) Repository 4-28-2007 April 28, 2007 (Pages 1949-2082) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2007 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "April 28, 2007 (Pages 1949-2082)" (2007). Volume 37 (2007). 17. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2007/17 This April is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 37 (2007) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 37 Number 17 Saturday, April 28, 2007 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 1949—2082 See Part II page 2063 for the Part I Environmental Quality Board’s Agencies in this issue proposed Clean Air Interstate Rule The Governor The Courts Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs Delaware River Basin Commission Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Community and Economic Development Department of Environmental Protection Department of Health Department of Revenue Department of Transportation Environmental Hearing Board Environmental Quality Board Health Care Cost Containment Council Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Office of Attorney General Patient Safety Authority Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission State Board of Nursing Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 389, April 2007 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna River Basin
    Spring 2017, Vol. 47, No. 1 ClearWatersNew York Water Environment Association, Inc. Susquehanna River Basin Also Inside: 89th Annual Meeting Highlights K O E S T E R THE TRUSTED SOLUTION EQUIPMENT • SERVICE • PARTS • RETROFITS • DESIGN SUPPORT • INSTALLATION Biological Treatment Instrumentation Repairs Blowers Odor Control Screening Chemical Feed Packaged Systems Sedimentation Clarification Preventative Maintenance Spare Parts Inventory Dewatering Pump Station Maintenance System Integration Disinfection Pumping Tanks and Mixers Emergency Assistance Pumps Telemetry Filtration Pumps Stations Training Grit Removal Remote Monitoring Valves Upstate New York NYC, Long Island, New Jersey Canada 3101 Seneca Turnpike 170 Kinnelon Road Koester Water Unit #7 Canastota, NY 13032 Suite 37 62 Plant Farm Blvd. Phone: (315) 697-3800 Kinnelon, NJ 07405 Brantford, ON N3S 7W3 Fax: (315) 697-3888 Phone: (973) 492-0400 Phone: (289) 696-7390 Fax: (973) 492-9581 www.koesterassociates.com [email protected] • [email protected] • [email protected] ClearWaSpringte 2017, Vol.r 47, sNo. 1 NYWEA Board of Directors New York Water Environment Association, Inc. Officers President . Paul J . McGarvey, Amherst President’s Message . 4 President–Elect . Geoffrey Baldwin, New York City Paul McGarvey Vice President . Robert Wither, Albany Vice President–Elect . William J . Nylic III, Woodbury Executive Director’s Message . 5 Treasurer . Thomas J . Lauro, New Rochelle Patricia Cerro-Reehil Assistant Treasurer . Anthony DellaValle, New Rochelle Highlights of 89th Annual Meeting . 6–7, 54–55 Immediate Past President . Joseph L . Fiegl, Buffalo WEF House of Delegates . John Fortin, New York City Water Views . 9 James Tierney Chapter Representatives Capital . Will Stradling, Troy Focus on Safety . 9 Central . Brian Skidmore, Syracuse Eileen Reynolds Genesee .
    [Show full text]