DOCSLIB.ORG

Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan December 18, 2007 Adopted by the Bedford County Board of Commissioners Prepared by the Bedford County Planning Commission With technical assistance provided by This plan was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program, Environmental Stewardship fund, under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Intentionally Blank Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................1-1 Plan Purpose and Value Planning Process Plan Overview by Chapter Setting and Study Area.........................................................................................................................2-1 Regional Setting County Characteristic and Trends Major Communities and Corridors Significant and Sizable Features Development and Conservation Policy Open Space Resources.............................................................................................................. 3-1 Sensitive Natural Resources Resources for Rural Industries Resources for Rural Character Regulation and Protection of Natural Resources Conclusions and Options Parks & Recreation Facilities ................................................................................................... 4-1 State Parks and Recreation Resources Local Public Park and Recreation Facility Assessment Analysis of Parks and Recreation Facilities Trends Conclusions for Recreation Facilities Recreation Systems ................................................................................................................... 5-1 Recreation Systems Public Needs and Interests Challenges of the Times Pennsylvania Recreation Plan 2004-2008 Recreation in Bedford County Recreation Linkages with Tourism Recreation Analysis Conclusions and Recommendations The Vision for Parks, Recreation and Open Space............................................................... 6-1 Vision Guiding Principles Goals and Objectives Action & Implementation Plan ............................................................................................... 7-1 BEDFORD COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN i Appendix Foundation and Authority for Parks, Recreation and Open Space Planning in Pennsylvania ............................................................................................................ A-1 Maps............................................................................................................................... A-5 Open Space Resources Map Fish and Game Resources Map Park and Recreation Facilities Map Trails and Greenways Map Parks, Recreation, Greenways and Open Space Network Map Reference Maps from the Southern Alleghenies Regional Greenways and Open Space Network Plan Greenway Corridor Composite Criteria Map Regional Greenway Projects Map Bedford County Project Corridors Map ii CONTENTS 1 Introduction Bedford County adopted its Revised Comprehensive Plan in December of 2006. This plan outlined the need for more specific policy and investment regarding the provision of recreation facilities and services and the stewardship of open space lands in Bedford County. These aspects of community life were deemed important by citizens and for citizens. Therefore, this new plan was developed to establish the direction, priorities and partnerships most suited to ensure that recreational opportunities and open spaces meet the needs of residents. However, this first Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan for Bedford County is timely for several other reasons, as well. Tabulation of the 2000 census was completed, marking the closure of the 20th century. Amendments to the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code in 2000 gave new authority, responsibilities, and tools to counties and municipalities for regional planning, farmland preservation, historic resource preservation, and water supply protection, among other items. In 2001, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania completed its first statewide Greenways Plan, Pennsylvania Greenways: An Action Plan for Creating Connections, and began investing in county planning efforts to carry forth its vision. Pennsylvania’s Bureau for Recreation and Conservation had just released its 2004- 2008 State Recreation Plan, including resident survey results by county. In addition, the county has joined with its neighboring counties to develop a five county regional greenway plan to regionalize conservation corridor efforts. To that end the County adopted the Southern Alleghenies Greenway Plan in 2007. Finally, Growing Greener II was proposed by Governor Ed Rendell, and approved in 2005, to make a portion of this $625 million initiative available for projects restoring natural resources, protecting open spaces, and revitalizing older communities. The Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan project represents an opportunity to synthesize current data with regional and comprehensive planning in order to position the County and its municipalities for action and investment. PA Greenways Vision Pennsylvania and its many partners will develop an outstanding network of greenways across the Commonwealth, creating an asset highly valued by Pennsylvanians and enhancing the quality of life for all. This network of greenways will connect Pennsylvania's open space, natural landscape features, scenic, cultural, historic, and recreation sites, and urban and rural communities. Greenways will become one of the Commonwealth’s most powerful tools to achieve sustainable growth and livable communities. - Pennsylvania Greenways: An Action Plan for Creating Connections, June 2001 BEDFORD COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN 1-1 Plan Purpose and Value Purpose This Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan sets forth a vision and guidelines for parks and facility development, leisure program and service delivery, the operation and management of the parks and recreation system, and the protection of open space and rural character. It provides a start toward meeting the recreational needs of County residents and visitors and securing accessible open space for all County residents. Value This Plan defines desirable outcomes, direction and action to sustain and enhance the quality of parks, recreation and open space in the Bedford County. It outlines tangible steps to be taken in meeting Bedford County's future needs. Its success will depend on serious commitment. In doing so, we can help: • Conserve and protect the county’s unique heritage and resources • Diversify the county’s travel options through land and water trails • Establish a true recreation system, not merely separate facilities and functions but a series of interconnected places and programs. • Strengthen and diversify the county’s economy through collaborative recreation and tourism. This plan provides a starting framework for making our vision for tomorrow a reality. Looking to the future, Bedford County wants to maintain the rural characteristics that attract people to the County, while enhancing the recreational opportunities and amenities for residents. Planning was the first challenge, implementation is the next. Again, this is not only the responsibility of public officials but a county wide endeavor of all sectors with a shared vision for the future and a belief that progress requires sustained effort. The Bedford County Planning Commission will be able to reference this document in their reviews of subdivision and land development plans. Where opportunities to accomplish the Plan’s goals exist and are not recognized by the proposed plan, the Commission and the planning staff should feel confident in requesting further consideration of the identified opportunities by the landowner or developer. Local municipalities can look to the plan for its data on resources and existing facilities, its ideas for municipal and multi-municipal projects, its listing of project partners and assistance programs and its case studies of approaches to resource management and recreation services, particularly in rural areas. Municipalities can also directly reference the existence and recommendations of the plan in their grant 1-2 INTRODUCTION applications to funding agencies; this emphasis on consistency with county policy often improves a municipality’s competitiveness for public funding. The plan has value for many other county partners. School districts may be interested in sidewalk and trail projects that provide safe routes to school, interpretive sites for outdoor education and opportunities to expand recreational facilities. Public and private recreation organizations may be willing to partner on unique recreation facilities or programs. Non-profit community and environmental associations may find new locations for special events in the highlights of existing parks and plans for their enhancement. Because the county’s open space and recreational assets are also attractive to visitors, this Plan will provide a source of information to the Bedford County Visitors Bureau. From the Plan, Bureau staff will see where Bedford County intends to encourage open space protection and recreational development, and can use this information in support of its cultural and heritage initiatives. Finally, business development groups may take interest in projects that will enrich the quality of life for their employees and in sponsorship opportunities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simple Maps of the Pennsylvania Turnpike System
    The Pennsylvania Turnpike Website: www.paturnpike.com Customer Service: 800.331.3414 (Outside U.S., call 717.831.7601) Travel Information: Dial 511 within PA Emergency Assistance or 1-877-511-PENN(7366) (877.736 .6727) when calling from outside of PA, Customer Service *11on the Pennsylvania Turnpike or visit www.511pa.com (Outside U.S., call 717-561-1522) *Gateway Toll Plaza (#2) near Ohio is a one-way toll facility. No toll is charged for westbound travel into Ohio, but there is an eastbound toll to enter Delmont Greensburg Pennsylvania via Gateway. The one-way tolling Bypass conversion was required to ease congestion and 66 allow installation of Express E-ZPass lanes. 14 Murrysville 22 Blairsville Sheffield D r. 66 12 BUS Sharon, Beaver Valley 66 Youngstown Expressway Harrison City 993 9 BUS Greensburg 376 15 66 422 Butler 8 Jeannette 130 Greensburg 376 6 Irwin 30 Greensburg 17 Mt. Jackson 108 New Castle Mainline Toll Zone 4 Mainline Toll Zone West Newton 136 Greensburg 20 New Galilee 168 Moravia 1 Erie Arona Rd. 351 Butler Ligonier Murrysville New Kensington Johnstown Greensburg 119 19 0 26 Elwood City ALLEGHENY 28 PITTSBURGH IRWIN DONEGAL 711 SOMERSET VALLEY 22 57 30 NEW STANTON 601 48 67 New Stanton Service Plaza 91 110 N.Somerset Service Plaza Allegheny Tunnel Warrendale Toll Plaza Allegheny River Allegheny Gateway Toll Plaza (Eastbound Only)* 75 Beaver River Beaver 49 To Central Section 76 70 76 Ohio 2 30 78 NEW BEAVER CRANBERRY BUTLER 112 of the map CASTLE 18 VALLEY 28 VALLEY 70 119 31 10 13 8 39 29 79 376 Darlington 551 Beaver
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Mineral Resources
    7. Mineral Resources The primary mineral resources extracted for human use in Allegany County are coal, sandstone, and limestone. Coal bearing formations are concentrated in the Georges Creek Basin in the western part of the county. Mineral resources present in Cumberland occur primarily in association with Shriver Ridge, Haystack Mountain, and Wills Mountain. All three of these landforms contain sandstone deposits of varying quality. Limestone formations occur between Shriver Ridge and Wills Mountain in the Valley Road area and extend across Wills Creek to the West Side. There are no current mining operations within the City of Cumberland. The limestone deposits in the Valley Road area and on the West Side have been quarried in the past. Outside of the City limits, there is an active sandstone mining operation on the northwest slope of Wills Mountain. This operation does not currently affect views of Wills Mountain from Cumberland. There is historic evidence that drilling for natural gas was unsuccessfully conducted in the Narrows at one time. However, the lithology of this area indicates that it is unlikely to be a potential source of natural gas. Issues: • Mineral extraction is not a use compatible with Cumberland's position as a regional urban center. Less developed areas of Allegany County have ample deposits to meet regional needs for mineral resources. Moreover, the mineral resources in Cumberland occur in association with landforms (Shriver Ridge, Haystack Mountain, and Wills Mountain) that are important to the City's visual setting. Mineral extraction is not currently a permitted use in any zoning district within Cumberland. • It is possible that mining on the northwest side of Wills Mountain could affect views of the mountain from Cumberland over the long term, depending upon the extent of future extraction and its potential to undermine slopes along the ridgetop.
    [Show full text]
  • BACKPACKING Explore the Great Allegheny Passage with Us! We Will Pedal a Total of 30 Miles out and Back Along the GAP
    April – June 2017 Schedule VENTURE OUTDOORS TRAILHEAD Everyone Belongs Outdoors! Board of Directors Did You Know… Alice Johnston, Board Chair Venture Outdoors is a 501(c)3 charitable nonprofit organization. We believe everyone Amanda Beamon, Vice Chair deserves the chance to experience how incredibly fun the outdoors can be, so we provide Darlene Schiller, Co-Secretary the gear, guidance and inspiration to make outdoor recreation part of people’s lives. Robert J. Standish, Co-Secretary Drew Lessard, Treasurer We believe everyone belongs outdoors! Todd Owens, Past Chair Abby Corbin Dennis Henderson David Hunt Support Venture Outdoors and Save with a Yearly Membership Lindsay Patross Go to ventureoutdoors.org/join-us or call 412.255.0564 x.224 to become a New or Marty Silverman Geoff Tolley Renewing Venture Outdoors Member. W. Jesse Ward Your Support Helps Venture Outdoors: David Wolf Membership Levels Student / Senior – $15 • Fund the outings and events that Staff Individual – $25 get you and your family outdoors year-round Joey–Linn Ulrich, Executive Director Dual – $35 Family – $50 • Enable underserved children to PROGRAM DEPARTMENT Trailblazer – $75 learn more about nature and the Lora Woodward, Director environment while developing Paddler – $100 Liz Fager, Community Program Manager outdoor recreation skills Jim Smith, Equipment and Facilities Manager Ranger – $125 Lora Hutelmyer, Youth Program Manager Steward – $250 • Turn volunteers into accomplished Jake Very, Custom Program Coordinator trip leaders while enhancing their Trustee – $500 Billy Dixon, Program Administrator leadership skills and safety training Ken Sikora, Head Trip Leader Specialist Pathfinder – $1,000 KAYAK PITTSBURGH Benefits to You Include: Vanessa Bashur, Director • Discounts on outings, Kayak Pittsburgh Mike Adams, Equipment and Training rentals and season passes Specialist • Shopping savings at Eddie Bauer DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS and Gander Mountain Donna L.
    [Show full text]
  • Sideling Hill Creek Preserve Visitors Guide
    Maryland Preserve Guide Sideling Hill Creek, Allegany County Sideling Hill Creek originates from the southwestern mountains of Pennsylvania, winding its way among the steep, forested shale cliffs of western Maryland before finally spilling into the Potomac River. It is one of the most pristine streams in Maryland, and helps support the Nature Conservancy Nature state’s healthiest population of the globally-rare The The aquatic wildflower Harperella. The rare shale barren communities are another unique feature of this preserve. There are twelve rare, endemic Sideling Hill Creek is one of the most (occurring in the shale barrens and nowhere else) pristine aquatic communities in its region. plants here including the nationally-endangered evening primrose, shale ragwort, and Kate’s mountain clover. The preserve also has many different animals, such as the Olympian marble butterfly, green Key Elements floater mussel, and tiger beetle. Other animals include wild turkey, hawks, and bobcat. Harperella Rare shale barren communities Fun Facts About Sideling Hill Evening primrose The Sideling Hill watershed is about 80% forest cover, Olympian marble butterfly and is incredibly intact because there are no urban centers or industry, and the area is sparsely populated. This isolation has allowed Sideling Hill Creek to have supremely high water quality and healthy aquatic communities. Due to the hydrology of the shale barrens, the water level in this clean creek is highly variable. This variability is common for water bodies near shale barrens, but Sideling Hill Creek is exceptionally variable. It has seven species of freshwater mussels and 40 species of fish. Throughout the preserve, there are also a number of ephemeral streams.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Wills Creek Preassessment
    Wills Creek Preassessment Eric Null Len Lichvar Produced by Somerset Conservation District, 6024 Glades Pike Road Suite 103, Somerset, PA 1 2 Wills Creek Preassessment Eric Null Len Lichvar March 2010 Somerset Conservation District Funding for this project provided by the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds With special assistance from the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Photos by Len Lichvar, Eric Null, and Amanda Deal Copies of this report may be obtained by contacting the Somerset Conservation District 6024 Glades Pike Road, Suite 103 Somerset, PA 15501 Phone (814) 445-4652 ext.5 Fax (814) 445-2044 E-mail [email protected] Report text may be accessed on the Somerset Conservation District Website http://www.somersetcd.org/ 3 Table of Contents Forward/Acknowledgements………...……………………………………………….7 Introduction………………………………………………………..………………….8 Methods………………………………………………………………………………10 Results…………………………………………………..…………………………....14 Discussion…………………………………………..………………………………..29 Recommendations …………………………………….…………………………….30 Literature Cited……………………………………….……………………………...31 Appendix 1— Macroinvertebrates collected at each site Appendix 2—Fishes collected at each site Wills Creek Sampling Station 5 4 List of Figures Figure 1. The Wills Creek watershed………………………………………………………....8 Figure 2. Wills Creek Preassessment sampling points…………………………………...….11 Figure 3. Macroinvertebrate species richness of the Wills Creek Watershed……………….15 Figure 4. Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index for the macroinvertebrates communities of the Wills Creek Watershed……………………………………………………..16 Figure 5. HBI scores for the Wills Creek watershed………………………………………....17 Figure 6. Percent EPT taxa in the Wills Creek watershed…………………………………....18 Figure 7. Percent Dominant taxa in the Wills Creek watershed……………………………...18 Figure 8. Percent acid tolerant taxa in the Wills Creek watershed…………………………...19 Figure 9. Fish species richness in the Wills Creek watershed ………………………………..21 Figure 10. Shannon-Weaver diversity index for fish communities in the Wills Creek Watershed…………………………………………………………………...22 Figure 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geology of the Transylvania Fault Zone in Bedford County, Pennsylvania
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Elizabeth Lauren Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Elizabeth Lauren, "STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA" (2009). University of Kentucky Master's Theses. 621. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/621 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF THESIS STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Transverse zones cross strike of thrust-belt structures as large-scale alignments of cross-strike structures. The Transylvania fault zone is a set of discontinuous right-lateral transverse faults striking at about 270º across Appalachian thrust-belt structures along 40º N latitude in Pennsylvania. Near Everett, Pennsylvania, the Breezewood fault terminates with the Ashcom thrust fault. The Everett Gap fault terminates westward with the Hartley thrust fault. Farther west, the Bedford fault extends westward to terminate against the Wills Mountain thrust fault. The rocks, deformed during the Alleghanian orogeny, are semi-independently deformed on opposite sides of the transverse fault, indicating fault movement during folding and thrusting. Palinspastic restorations of cross sections on either side of the fault zone are used to compare transverse fault displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles
    DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin­ Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir­ where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle­ stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter­ each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I-68/I-70: a WINDOW to the APPALACHIANS by Dr. John J
    I-68/I-70: A WINDOW TO THE APPALACHIANS by Dr. John J. Renton Dept. of Geology & Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Introduction The Appalachian Mountains are probably the most studied mountains on Earth. Many of our modern ideas as to the origin of major mountain systems evolved from early investigations of the Appalachian region. The Appalachians offer a unique opportunity to experience the various components of an entire mountain system within a relatively short distance and period of time. Compared to the extensive areas occupied by other mountain systems such as the Rockies and the Alps, the Appalachians are relatively narrow and can be easily crossed within a few hours driving time. Following I-68 and I-70 between Morgantown, WV, and Frederick, Maryland, for example, one can visit all of the major structural components within the Appalachians within a distance of about 160 miles. Before I continue, I would like to clarify references to the Allegheny and Appalachian mountains. The Allegheny Mountains were created about 250 million years ago when continents collided during the Alleghenian Orogeny to form the super-continent of Pangea (Figure 1). As the continents collided, a range of mountains were created in much the same fashion that the Himalaya Mountains are now being formed by the collision of India and Asia. About 50 million years after its Figure 1 1 creation, Pangea began to break up with the break occurring parallel to the axis of the original mountains. As the pieces that were to become our present continents moved away from each other, the Indian, Atlantic, and Arctic oceans were created (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration.Pdf
    exio GENERALIZED SECTION OF THE ROCKS IN THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES SCALE: 1 INCH = 1000 FEET SYSTEM SERIES GROUP THICKNESS FORMATION. SYMBOL SECTION IN FEET MINOR DIVISIONS CHARACTER OF MEMBERS GENERAL CHARACTER OF FORMATIONS PENNSYL- Brookville coal member. Probably 41 to 5 feet thick. Impure; inferior quality. Shale and sandstone with workable coal beds. VANIAN Allegheny formation. Ca ^-^^50 Homewood sandstone member Coarse thick -bedded sandstone. Mercer shale member Clay, coal, and shale 130 300 Mainly coarse sandstone with shale, coal, and clay in middle. Pottsville formation Cpv ^JcrorgTqoijuuuuiMranacxx Connoquenessing sandstone member. Coarse thick-bedded sandstone. _ -~ '~^^~^~=^ In Hollidaysburg quadrangle coarse, lumpy, red and green shale, mostly red; 80 feet of sandstone at bottom. CARBONIFEROUS Mauch Chunk formation. Cmc 180-1000 In Huntingdon quadrangle a little yellowish-green sandstone in midst of red shale and at top; at bottom, V-'i' -V-' r'-'i'.v: 'i ' '!' ' Trough Creek limestone member, red and gray, coarsely crystalline. ~~~~^-- _ ^&>;&^:^&;& Siliceous cross-bedded limestone. (Cb) (300-500) Burgoon sandstone member Rather coarse micaceous, arkosic yellowish or greenish-gray thick-bedded MISSISSIPPI sandstone. Patton shale member. _- - - -- - Red shale on Allegheny Front and westward. Pocono formation. Cpo 990 Lower 700 feet in Hollidaysburg quadrangle, shale and sandstone, considerable red shale. Lower 900 feet in Huntingdon quadrangle, shale, sandstone, and conglomerate, very little red shale. Shale mostly stiff, imperfectly fissile, greenish. ^-j-i-^-'. ' "*" '.. '' _» =y^=-^-- "ZZT??*?1^^ - .-T^ ' ' - ' ' ' ^ About 80 percent bright red shale, alternating with layers of reddish or brown sandstone, which is generally 8000- thick-bedded and medium-grained. Some laminated layers. The red .shale is in places mottled with Hampshire formation.
    [Show full text]