Borough of Roaring Spring Blair County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Borough of Roaring Spring Blair County DAVID M. WALKER ASSOCIATES INC. December 31, 1968 JAN 2 - ;e?? Mr. Richard Sutter, County Planning Director Blair County Court House Annex Holidaysburg , Pennsylvania Dear Dick, Pursuant to the recent request by Bob Over, I have enclosed herewith a completed copy of the Roaring Spring Plan Element section which completes the Roaring Spring Master Plan. In approximately two weeks, I anticipate that all of the printed and bound copies will be completed, at which time I will arrange with Bob Over to have a copy forwarded to you. Very truly yours, DA-VID M-.WALKER ASSOC, INC.. Richard L. Knowles, AIP Planning Director Pittsburgh Regional Office ELK:amc Encl. CITY PLANNIND URBAN RENEWAL DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS - 333 BOULEVARD OF ALLIES * PITTSSUROH, PENNSYLVANIA 16222 TELEPHONE 4111361-8080 ROARING SPRING MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION Roaring Spring is presently on the threshold of a new period of internal growth and development which is expected to have a very great influence on the future , shape and character of the Borough. In effect, Roaring Spring is on the move, and it is concerned with the future; the Borough is a progressive community, and it desires to become an even better place in which to live and work. In order to better prepare itself for the future and, perhaps more importantly, to be in a position to influence or guide growth and development, Roaring Spring is "planning." The harmonious use of land and the co-ordination of various public facilities and services with land development are the basic concerns of any com- 1 munity planning program. The manner,in which land and facilities are developed is significant in determining the character of a community, the quality of its neighborhoods and the strength of its tax base. The following section of the Comprehensive Plan presents a long-range, twenty- year guide for the public and private uses of land in Roaring Spring. The Compre- hensive Development Plan is based on the preceeding analyses of existing conditions and anticapated future needs. Also, the plan reflects local goals and objectives aimed at creating balanced and harmonious development. The Comprehensive Community Plan, which is concerned with the entire physical envi'cbnment.ofthe Borouglid, consists of the following major elements. I .Land Use Plan. A plan showing the amount and location of land proposed for commerical, industrial, residential, and public purposes. Thoroughfare Plan. A plan for the improvement of traffic circulation within the Borough related to regional as well as local needs. Central Business District and Parking Plan. A plan for the improvement of parking and traffic circulation facilities within the Borough's central business district and a plan to revitalize and encourage the attraction of new business and development. Community Facilities Plan. A plan for the improvement and enlargement of community facilities including schools, parks, playgcounds and public buildings. In addition to the above plan elements, the Comprehensive Plan contains recom- mendations for effectuation of the proposed plans through capital improvements programming, zoning, subdivision controls, and urban renewal activities. Since there is generally some confusion with regard to the nature of a Master Plan, three points, which were noted earlier, should be re-emphasized. FIRST, IT IS NOT THE FUNCTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO PROVIDE DETAILED BLUE-PRINTS OR DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS, SUCH PLANS WOULD IN ALL LIKELIHOOD BE OUT-OF-DATE LONG BEFORE STEPS WERE TAKEN TO ACTIVATE SUCH PROJECTS, AND, IN ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT OF DETAILED PROJECT PLANS WOULD TEND TO CONFUSE THE LONG-RANGE GBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN. SECONDLY, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS OF ITSELF A RATHER LIMITED INSTRUMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT AND ULTIMATE ADOPTION OF A MASTER PLAN DOES NOT AUTCMATICALLY BENEFIT NOR GUARANTEE THE SOLVING OF ALL FUTURE PROBLEMS OR EVEN THGSE ANTICIPATED BY THE -PLAN. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A MASTER PLAN RESTS RATHER IN THE DEGREE . TO WHICH IT IS USED BY LOCAL OFFICIALS AND AN ALERT CITIZENRY CONCERNED WITH AND HOPEFUL FOR ORDERLY COMMUNITY DEVELOP- MENT. THIRDLY, A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAN NEVER BE CONSIDERED TO BE "COMPLETED"; IT IS NOT A FINAL NOR INFLEXIBLE DGCUMENT. IT REFLECTS CURRENT LOCAL CBJECTIVES IN RELATION TO EXISTING COND- ITIONS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND LOCAL OFFICIALS MUST BE ALERT TO CHANGING CONDITIONS AND PARTICULAR CPPGRTUNITIES TO CARRY OUT THE VARIOUS PLANNING PROPOSALS. IN ADDITION, AS CON- DITIONS CHANGE AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TAKE PLACE, THESE PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED AND RE-EVALUATED IN RELATION TO NEW CONDITIONS OR NEW CGMMUNITY-WIDE OBJECTIVES. THIS IS WHAT IS MEANT BY PLAN- NING BEING A CONTINUOUS PROCESS. THUS, IN A VERY REAL SENSE, THE PLANNING PROGRAM IN RGARING SPRING WILL NOT END WITH THE AUOPT- ION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BUT WILL BEGIN AT THAT FOINT. PROCEDURE In order to arrive at the various conclusions required to develop a Comprehensive Plan for the Borough, the following procedure was undertaken: 1. The various basic inventory studies were presented in individual report form for review by the Planning Com- mission and Borough officials at regular intervals. Based upon this review procedure and several public meetings, these reports were put into final form reflecting local comments and discussions. 2. Individual preliminary ''sketch'' plans were developed based on the findings of the inventory phase of the planning pro- gram -and previously established local obiectives. These "sketch1' plans included considerations regarding land use, traffic and community facilities development. ,3. Various alternative proposals were considered. These alter- natives related primarily to residential densities, commercial ,. and industrial site development, traffic circulation, and the effect of alternate land uses on the local financial structure. 4. Upon concurrency by the Planning Commission, the preliminary plans were put into final form. SUMMARY OF EX1 STI N G CON D I TI ON S Following is a general summary of some of the salient findings of the inventory phase of the planning program. As may be concluded from the various invent- ory studies, Roaring Spring has many assets; however, it is not without liabilities. Some problems can be overcome within a reasonable period of.time, given the proper understanding, coordination and support. Others, due primarily to their physical nature, will have to be accepted realistically and adapted as best as possible. 1. While the topography has not created any serious land development problems because of slope or drainage characteristics, it has impeded the development of a proper and complete vehicular circulation network. 2. Several sections of the Borough are characterized by mixed land uses, which in themselves are not parti - cularly detrimental, but when combined in structures not originally dbsigned for such uses, can create blighting conditions in a neighborhood or section of the Borough. 3. Four industries exist in the Borough, only two of which could be considered major employers. The entire region suffers from a "chronic labor surplus'' condition. 4. Per capital income in Roaring Spring is higher than that found in the surrounding county and region, but less than the state average. 5. Fifteen percent of the Borough's families have annual incomes of less than $3,000. This is an income level established by the Federal Government as a poverty indicator. 6. Because of physical obsolescence, and limited market area, the retail sector of Roaring Spring'S;economy is not in a healthy condition. 7. The bulk of housing units in the Borough are over 45 years old, which indicates a need for continued main- tenance to prevent blight in residential neighborhoods. I' 8. Almost 30% of the Borough's inhabitants must rely on Public Assistance, Social Security, pensions, or other fixed .incomes. 9. At the present time there are no Borough-owned or oper- ated recreational facilities in Roaring Spring. , 10. Most major streets in the Borough do not meet minimum right-of-way standards in use today. On the other hand, the Borough has many assets which may be capitalized upon: 1. Roaring Spring is set in an area of great natural beauty which is extremely important in the development of recreational facilities to capture some of the burgeoning leisure-time market. 2. Over 90% of the vacant land in the Borough is relatively level (0% to 8% slope) and has good potential for future development. 3. Population has been increasing at a fairly low rate and should continue to do so, barring economic recessions or major war. By 1985, it is expected that the Borough will have a population 3,365. 4. Based on present Borough limits, the ultimate holding capacity is 3,900 to 4,000 persons. 5. Municipal facilities are generally adequate to serve present needs, but there is a strong need for long- range expansion programs. 6. Revenues from the three principal tax sources have shown gains in the past and continued increases can be expected in the future. GOALS FOR FUTURE ACTION Before any program of community improvement is launched, a determination of e goals must be made. Goals are objective for revitalization and a guide for future courses of action. It is important to derive maximum return for invest- ments in the future. The gals of Roaring Spring's Comprehensive Plan for com- munity development and improvement are: 1. The Plan must provide an efficient circulation system designed to minimize congestion and improve access. 2. The Plan should diagram the maximum produc'tive land -use in all areas of Roaring Spring and provide a pro- porti:onaI balance of these uses to encourage vitality. 3. The Plan should promote a higher volume of economic activity and stimulate a full range of diversification. 4. The Plan should provide an raesthetically pleasing environment which will attract and keep residents and promote trade and industry. 5. The Plan should encourage citizen participation in community affairs and instill a sense of pride in Roaring Spring to achieve a positive community image .
Recommended publications
  • Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
    Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan December 18, 2007 Adopted by the Bedford County Board of Commissioners Prepared by the Bedford County Planning Commission With technical assistance provided by This plan was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program, Environmental Stewardship fund, under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Intentionally Blank Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................1-1 Plan Purpose and Value Planning Process Plan Overview by Chapter Setting and Study Area.........................................................................................................................2-1 Regional Setting County Characteristic and Trends Major Communities and Corridors Significant and Sizable Features Development and Conservation Policy Open Space Resources.............................................................................................................. 3-1 Sensitive Natural Resources Resources for Rural Industries Resources for Rural Character Regulation and Protection of Natural Resources Conclusions and Options Parks & Recreation Facilities ................................................................................................... 4-1 State Parks and Recreation Resources Local Public Park and Recreation Facility Assessment Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles
    DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin­ Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir­ where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle­ stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter­ each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration.Pdf
    exio GENERALIZED SECTION OF THE ROCKS IN THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES SCALE: 1 INCH = 1000 FEET SYSTEM SERIES GROUP THICKNESS FORMATION. SYMBOL SECTION IN FEET MINOR DIVISIONS CHARACTER OF MEMBERS GENERAL CHARACTER OF FORMATIONS PENNSYL- Brookville coal member. Probably 41 to 5 feet thick. Impure; inferior quality. Shale and sandstone with workable coal beds. VANIAN Allegheny formation. Ca ^-^^50 Homewood sandstone member Coarse thick -bedded sandstone. Mercer shale member Clay, coal, and shale 130 300 Mainly coarse sandstone with shale, coal, and clay in middle. Pottsville formation Cpv ^JcrorgTqoijuuuuiMranacxx Connoquenessing sandstone member. Coarse thick-bedded sandstone. _ -~ '~^^~^~=^ In Hollidaysburg quadrangle coarse, lumpy, red and green shale, mostly red; 80 feet of sandstone at bottom. CARBONIFEROUS Mauch Chunk formation. Cmc 180-1000 In Huntingdon quadrangle a little yellowish-green sandstone in midst of red shale and at top; at bottom, V-'i' -V-' r'-'i'.v: 'i ' '!' ' Trough Creek limestone member, red and gray, coarsely crystalline. ~~~~^-- _ ^&>;&^:^&;& Siliceous cross-bedded limestone. (Cb) (300-500) Burgoon sandstone member Rather coarse micaceous, arkosic yellowish or greenish-gray thick-bedded MISSISSIPPI sandstone. Patton shale member. _- - - -- - Red shale on Allegheny Front and westward. Pocono formation. Cpo 990 Lower 700 feet in Hollidaysburg quadrangle, shale and sandstone, considerable red shale. Lower 900 feet in Huntingdon quadrangle, shale, sandstone, and conglomerate, very little red shale. Shale mostly stiff, imperfectly fissile, greenish. ^-j-i-^-'. ' "*" '.. '' _» =y^=-^-- "ZZT??*?1^^ - .-T^ ' ' - ' ' ' ^ About 80 percent bright red shale, alternating with layers of reddish or brown sandstone, which is generally 8000- thick-bedded and medium-grained. Some laminated layers. The red .shale is in places mottled with Hampshire formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford County Natural Heritage Inventory, 1998
    BEDFORD COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY Prepared for: The Bedford County Planning Commission Russell Building, 203 S. Juliana Street Bedford, PA 15522 Prepared by: Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 209 Fourth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 September 1998 This project was funded by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, by the Southwestern Pennsylvania Heritage Preservation Commission under the Grant Agreement #GA-4174-6-0024 and by the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. Cover illustration: Topographic Settings map of Bedford County – hilltop upper slope lower slope valley bottom . Source: Bedford County Planning Commission. Printed on recycled paper PREFACE The Bedford County Natural Heritage Inventory identifies and maps Bedford County’s most significant natural places. The study investigated plant and animal species and natural communities that are unique or uncommon in the county; it also explored areas important for general wildlife habitat and scientific study. The inventory does not confer protection to any of the areas listed in the report. It is, however, a tool for informed and responsible decision-making. Public and private organizations may use the inventory to guide land acquisition and conservation decisions. Local municipalities and the County may use it to help with comprehensive planning, zoning and the review of development proposals. Developers, utility companies and government agencies alike may benefit from access to this environmental information prior to the creation of detailed development plans. Although the inventory was conducted using a tested and proven methodology, it is best viewed as a preliminary report rather than the final word on the subject of Bedford County’s natural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Lath Pleistocene Cave Deposit in Bedford County, Pennsylvania
    BULLETIN of THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 26, NUMBER 4 OCTOBER 1964 CONTENTS NEW PARIS No. 4: A PLEISTOCENE CAVE DEPOSIT IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA - - - - - John E. Guilday, Paul S. Martin, Allen D. McCrady 121 Published quarterly by the NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Subscription rate in effect January 1, 1964: 84.00. Office Address: THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2318 N. KENMORE ST. ARLINGTON 1, VIRGINIA DISCUSSION of papers published in the BULLETIN is invited. Discussions should be 2000 words or less in length with not more than 3 illustrations. Discussions of papers in this issue should be forwarded to the editor by January 15, 1965. EDITOR JERRY D. VINEYARD Missouri Geological Survey Rolla, Missouri ASSOCIATE EDITORS THOMAS C. BARR, JR. THOMAS L. POULSON JOHN V. THRAILKILL Department of Zoology Department of Zoology Department of Geology University of Kentucky Yale University Princeton University Lexington, Kentucky New Haven, Connecticut Princeton, New Jersey RANE L. CURL RICHARD J. REARDON WILLIAM B. WHITE Department of Chem. Eng. Pacific Academy Department of Geochemistry University of Michigan Box 347 Pennsylvania State University Ann Arbor, Michigan Arcadia, California University Park, Pennsylvania Copyright 1964 by the National Speleological Society, Inc. NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY is a non-profit organization de- voted to the study of caves, karst and allied phenomena. It was founded in 1940 and is chartered under the law of the District of Columbia. The Society is associated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. THE SOCIETY serves as a central agency for the collection, preservation, and publication of information relating to speleology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History
    BRIEF HISTORY OF BEDFORD COUNTY A BRIEF HISTORY OF BEDFORD COUNTY Published March 1924, Inquirer Printing Company, Bedford, Pa This brief history of Bedford County, by districts, in the order of their organization, has been compiled from early records by William L. Byers, of McConnellsburg, forester of the Buchanan district. Pennsylvania was named by Charles the Second, King of England, in honor of Sir William Penn, an eminent admiral of the English navy. Penn is a Welsh name and means high or head; sylvania means woodlands; Pennsylvania, therefore, means high or head woodlands. It is the only State in the United States that has forests connected with its name. Bedford Borough … About 1750 an Indian trader named Ray established himself on or near the present site of Bedford, and erected three log buildings. It is not known how long he remained. After Ray came one Garret Pendergrass, Sr., who, by the consent of the Indians, made some improvements, but removed from the site shortly after the beginning of the French and Indian War. In1755 an attempt was made to open a wagon road from Ft. Loudon. In the spring of 1757 Col. Armstrong was ordered by Gov. Denny to march from Carlisle to Raystown, but failed. In the summer of 1757, Capt. Hamilton led a scouting party from Carlisle to the present site of Bedford. In July and August, 1758, a, stockade was erected by the advance forces of General Forbes' army. Therefore, the history of the town begins in 1758, when the road was opened southward to Fort Cumberland and the great military route from Carlisle to Ligonier and Fort Pitt was completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Huntingdon, Being a Brief Account of the History of Huntingdon
    Glass _fi53L__ PRESENTED BY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from The Library of Congress http://www.archive.org/details/historichuntingdOOoldh fw(rLa/Lw Si (CO^vc, fU^2 JSTOKHC jsmtos 6 X C?<5L, p^hsu^^ u^/- ^) ( Huntingdon Old Home Week September 5-11, 1909 Price 25 Cents PRESS OF THE MONITOR COMPANY HUNTINGDON. PA. 7/6 SELINA HASTINGS, COUNTESS OF HUNTINGDON. - - BORN AUG. 24th, 1 7 7 M ARR I ED JUNE 3rd. 1728--DIED JUNE 17TH, 1791. DONINGTON PARK, LEICESTERSHIRE, ENGLAND. IN WHOSE HONOR BOTH BOROUGH AND COUNTY ARE NAMED. BENEFACTRESS OF THE REV. WILLIAM SMITH, D. D. Souvenir Edition Historic Huntingdon Being a brief account of the history of Huntingdon from its earliest settlements to the present day, comprising many his- torical facts, now published for the first time, regarding its formation, divisions and government, together with its military, educational and industrial progress. September 5-11, 1909 Published by ~The Historical Committee of the Old Home Week Association Huntingdon, Pa. Historical Committee of the Old Home Week Association Huntingdon, Penna. James H. Nale, Chairman Dr. M. G. Brumbaugh Cap. John Brewster Murray Africa, C. E. Robert A. Orbison, Esq. Prof. J. H. Brumbaugh William H. Trude, Esq. W. A. Maguire George W. Garrettson The Historical Committee desires to express its thanks to J. Murray Afri- ca, and R. A. Orbison who have con- tributed to the subject matter of this book- let, and to the J. C. Blair Company and E. E. C. Gibbs for illustrations furnished. ^i.lW. ft^vujvJlj-c^cJL^b <i '.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegheny Portage Railroad
    THE HISTORY AND GEOLOGY OF THE ALLEGHENY PORTAGE RAILROAD BLAIR AND CAMBRIA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA May 11, 2002 Guidebook for the PITTSBURGH GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Field Trip Saturday, May 11, 2002 THE HISTORY AND GEOLOGY OF THE ALLEGHENY PORTAGE RAILROAD, BLAIR AND CAMBRIA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA Trip leader: John A. Harper, Pennsylvania Geological Survey For additional copies of this field trip guidebook, contact: Pittsburgh Geological Society PO Box 58172 Pittsburgh, PA 15209 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 Historical Perspective .................................................................................................................2 The Pennsylvania Mainline Canal System .....................................................................2 A Tunnel Through The Mountain ...................................................................................5 The Advantage Of Railroads ..........................................................................................6 Construction (Finally!!!) .................................................................................................8 Railroad Bed .......................................................................................................9 Railroad Tracks ...................................................................................................9 Ropes .................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Juniata River Water Trail Raystown Branch
    Join the annual Juniata River Sojourn: www.jcwp.org Juniata River Water Trail Raystown Branch photo-JCWP (MILES CORRESPOND TO Map & Guide ALONG THE WAY– RAYSTOWN BRANCH JUNIATA RIVER WATER TRAIL RIVER MILEAGE ON MAP) This river corridor is rich in history. As you paddle down the river, Mile 73.5, Juniata Crossings Lodge and Bridge Piers- The stone lodge you’re paddling through history! “Juniata” is Native American for built in 1812, about one mile west of present day Breezewood on river left, “standing stone” or “people of the standing stone,” “Raystown” is on the National Register of Historic Sites. Overnight guests included is derived from Robert MacRay, a settler who established a trading Abraham Lincoln and Zachary Taylor. Nearby stone piers once supported a Water trails are recreational waterways on a lake, river, or ocean between specifi c post in 1750 at present-day Bedford. Prior to this, the valley was two-lane covered bridge built in 1816 (the second Juniata Crossings historic inhabitated by many peoples. bridge location) and was destroyed in the fl ood of 1936. A concrete bridge locations, containing access points and day-use and/or camping sites for the While many are familiar with the Native Americans who resided in (the third Juniata Crossings bridge location is still in use) was then built boating public. Water trails emphasize low-impact use and promote stewardship the valley, including the Shawnee, Tuscarora, Delaware (Lenape), and about 300 yards downstream from the old covered bridge, which relocated the valley’s namesake – the Juniata (Ona Jutta Hage), earlier prehistoric the present-day Lincoln Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY: Historic Huntingdon, 1767-1909, Chapter 1, Charter, Huntingdon County, PA
    HISTORY: Historic Huntingdon, 1767-1909, Chapter 1, Charter, Huntingdon County, PA Contributed for use in the USGenWeb Archives by Nancy Lorz Copyright 2007. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.org/copyright.htm http://www.usgwarchives.org/pa/huntingdon/ _____________________________________________________________________ Historic Huntingdon, 1709-1907. Huntingdon Old Home Week, September 5-11, 1909. Souvenir Edition. Huntingdon, Pa.: Historical Committee of the Old Home Week Association, 1909. _____________________________________________________________________ SELINA HASTINGS, COUNTESS OF HUNTINGDON. [portrait] Born Aug. 24th, 1707 - Married June 3rd, 1728 - Died June 17th, 1791. Donington Park, Leicestershire, England. In whose honor both borough and county are named. Benefactress of the Rev. William Smith, D.D. Historical Committee of the Old Home Week Association Huntingdon, Penna. James H. Nale, Chairman Dr. M. C. Brumbaugh Cap. John Brewster Murray Africa, C.E. Robert A. Orbison, Esq. Prof. J. H. Brumbaugh William H. Trude, Esq. W. A. Maguire George W. Garrettson The Historical Committee desires to express its thanks to J. Murray Africa and R. A. Orbison who have contributed to the subject matter of this booklet, and to the J. C. Blair Company and E. E. C. Gibbs for illustrations furnished. ONOJUTTA - JUNIATA - ACHSINNIC. STANDING STONE [photo] Erected September 8th, 1896, as a Memorial to the ANCIENT STANDING STONE Removed by the Indians in 1754. {copy of inscription} Officers and Chairmen of the Huntingdon Old Home Week Association Honorary President, Hon. George B. Orlady. Honorary Vice Presidents, Hon. T. B. Patton. Hon. P. M. Lytle, E. S. McMurtrie, Esq., J. R. Simpson, Esq., J. C. Hazlett. PRESIDENT - Gilbert Greenberg. VICE PRESIDENTS - William Reed, Howard E.
    [Show full text]
  • Shobers Run Coldwater Conservation Plan
    Fort Bedford Trout Unlimited Shobers Run Coldwater Conservation Plan Prepared by Fort Bedford Trout Unlimited Volunteers August 2006 Coldwater Heritage Partnership The Coldwater Heritage Partnership (CHP) exists to provide leadership, coordination, technical assistance, and funding support for the evaluation, conservation, conservation and protection of Pennsylvania’s coldwater streams. The CHP is composed of Pennsylvania Trout (PATU), the PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources DCNR), and the PA Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC). The CHP grant program is administered by PATU under contract with DCNR and receives funding assistance from DCNR, PFBC, and the Western PA Watershed Program (WPWP). Coldwater Conservation Grants The Coldwater Heritage Partnership administers a grant program to develop Coldwater Conservation Plans to conserve and protect our coldwater streams. These plans are useful in building awareness and support for the long-term stewardship of coldwater streams and their surrounding watersheds. The plans are meant to identify potential problems and opportunities for stream conservation and may lead to more detailed watershed studies or projects to improve watershed health. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Purpose of Study 1 The Watershed Physical Description 2 History 3 Geology and Soils 6 Legacy Sediments 7 Climate 7 Recreation 8 Natural Heritage Inventory 8 Invasive Plants 8 Land Use 8 Watershed Stakeholders 10 Issues and Concerns Public Meeting 12 Watershed Health Visual Assessment 13 Water Chemistry 25 Macroinvertebrate Sampling 29 Conclusions and Recommendations Summary of Findings 35 Goals and Objectives 37 References 41 Appendix A Topographic Maps Appendix B Historic Maps Appendix C 1939 Aerial Photographs Appendix D Soil Survey Maps Appendix E Monitoring Data Introduction Purpose of Study The Fort Bedford chapter of Trout Unlimited chose to develop an informal assessment and a plan for conserving the Shobers Run watershed for several reasons.
    [Show full text]