DOCSLIB.ORG

Bedford County Natural Heritage Inventory, 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bedford County Natural Heritage Inventory, 1998 BEDFORD COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY Prepared for: The Bedford County Planning Commission Russell Building, 203 S. Juliana Street Bedford, PA 15522 Prepared by: Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 209 Fourth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 September 1998 This project was funded by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, by the Southwestern Pennsylvania Heritage Preservation Commission under the Grant Agreement #GA-4174-6-0024 and by the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. Cover illustration: Topographic Settings map of Bedford County – hilltop upper slope lower slope valley bottom . Source: Bedford County Planning Commission. Printed on recycled paper PREFACE The Bedford County Natural Heritage Inventory identifies and maps Bedford County’s most significant natural places. The study investigated plant and animal species and natural communities that are unique or uncommon in the county; it also explored areas important for general wildlife habitat and scientific study. The inventory does not confer protection to any of the areas listed in the report. It is, however, a tool for informed and responsible decision-making. Public and private organizations may use the inventory to guide land acquisition and conservation decisions. Local municipalities and the County may use it to help with comprehensive planning, zoning and the review of development proposals. Developers, utility companies and government agencies alike may benefit from access to this environmental information prior to the creation of detailed development plans. Although the inventory was conducted using a tested and proven methodology, it is best viewed as a preliminary report rather than the final word on the subject of Bedford County’s natural heritage. Further investigations could potentially uncover previously unidentified Natural Heritage Areas. Likewise, in-depth investigations of sites listed in this report could reveal features of further or greater significance than have been documented. Some of the areas described here are privately owned. In such cases, anyone wishing to visit these areas should obtain permission from the property owner(s) prior to visitation. The Western Pennsylvania Conservancy served as the principal investigator for the study and prepared the report and maps that are the products of the study. The Western Pennsylvania Conservancy is a private, non-profit, conservation organization which protects natural lands, promotes healthy communities, and preserves Fallingwater. Any questions concerning sites or updates to the inventory may be addressed to the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, 209 Fourth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222; phone: (412)288- 2777. The Bedford County Planning Commission administered this study. Requests for copies of the inventory can be addressed to the Bedford County Planning Commission, Russell Building, 203 S. Juliana Street, Bedford, PA 15522, phone: (814) 623-4827. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to acknowledge the many citizens and landowners of the county and surrounding areas who volunteered information, time, and effort to the inventory and granted permission to access land. We especially thank Jeffry Kloss and Frank Burrgraf of the Bedford County Planning Commission, Terry Miller from the County Conservation District, Rob Knight of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Dave Koppenhaver and Rob Criswell of the PA Game Commission, Steve Wacker of the PA Bureau of Forestry, Bill Plank of the Southern Alleghenies Conservancy, and Carol Loeffler of Dickenson College. It would be impossible to name and thank all individuals that contributed, but without their help, the inventory would not have been completed. Jeffrey D. Wagner Community Ecologist Western Pennsylvania Conservancy ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE................................................................................................................. I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................II RESULTS .................................................................................................................1 COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORIES .......................................19 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................19 NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS CLASSIFICATION ............................................................................20 NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY METHODS...............................................................................23 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS ............25 Natural Heritage Areas............................................................................................................25 Other Recommendations..........................................................................................................26 OVERVIEW OF BEDFORD COUNTY NATURAL FEATURES..................28 RESULTS BY U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE ...........................................................32 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................32 Entriken....................................................................................................................................36 Saxton.......................................................................................................................................39 Wells Tannery .........................................................................................................................43 Breezewood ..............................................................................................................................46 Martinsburg.............................................................................................................................49 Hopewell ..................................................................................................................................52 Everett East .............................................................................................................................59 Mench......................................................................................................................................64 Amaranth.................................................................................................................................68 Bellegrove ................................................................................................................................72 Roaring Springs ......................................................................................................................77 New Enterprise.........................................................................................................................80 Everett West .............................................................................................................................83 Clearville..................................................................................................................................88 Chaneysville ............................................................................................................................92 Chaneysville.............................................................................................................................95 Artemas..................................................................................................................................101 Blue Knob..............................................................................................................................105 Alum Bank.............................................................................................................................109 Bedford ..................................................................................................................................115 Rainsburg ..............................................................................................................................126 Beans Cove ............................................................................................................................132 Flintstone...............................................................................................................................143 Beaverdale .............................................................................................................................149 Ogletown................................................................................................................................152 Schellsburg ............................................................................................................................157 Buffalo Mills .........................................................................................................................161 iii Hyndman ...............................................................................................................................165 Evitts Creek ...........................................................................................................................173 Central City ...........................................................................................................................177 New Baltimore.......................................................................................................................180
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Class a Wild Trout Streams
    CLASS A WILD TROUT STREAMS STATEWIDE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS REVIEW STREAM REDESIGNATION EVALUATION Drainage Lists: A, C, D, E, F, H, I, K, L, N, O, P, Q, T WATER QUALITY MONITORING SECTION (MAB) DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS BUREAU OF POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION December 2014 INTRODUCTION The Department of Environmental Protection (Department) is required by regulation, 25 Pa. Code section 93.4b(a)(2)(ii), to consider streams for High Quality (HQ) designation when the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) submits information that a stream is a Class A Wild Trout stream based on wild trout biomass. The PFBC surveys for trout biomass using their established protocols (Weber, Green, Miko) and compares the results to the Class A Wild Trout Stream criteria listed in Table 1. The PFBC applies the Class A classification following public notice, review of comments, and approval by their Commissioners. The PFBC then submits the reports to the Department where staff conducts an independent review of the trout biomass data in the fisheries management reports for each stream. All fisheries management reports that support PFBCs final determinations included in this package were reviewed and the streams were found to qualify as HQ streams under 93.4b(a)(2)(ii). There are 50 entries representing 207 stream miles included in the recommendations table. The Department generally followed the PFBC requested stream reach delineations. Adjustments to reaches were made in some instances based on land use, confluence of tributaries, or considerations based on electronic mapping limitations. PUBLIC RESPONSE AND PARTICIPATION SUMMARY The procedure by which the PFBC designates stream segments as Class A requires a public notice process where proposed Class A sections are published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin first as proposed and secondly as final, after a review of comments received during the public comment period and approval by the PFBC Commissioners.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Maps of the Pennsylvania Turnpike System
    The Pennsylvania Turnpike Website: www.paturnpike.com Customer Service: 800.331.3414 (Outside U.S., call 717.831.7601) Travel Information: Dial 511 within PA Emergency Assistance or 1-877-511-PENN(7366) (877.736 .6727) when calling from outside of PA, Customer Service *11on the Pennsylvania Turnpike or visit www.511pa.com (Outside U.S., call 717-561-1522) *Gateway Toll Plaza (#2) near Ohio is a one-way toll facility. No toll is charged for westbound travel into Ohio, but there is an eastbound toll to enter Delmont Greensburg Pennsylvania via Gateway. The one-way tolling Bypass conversion was required to ease congestion and 66 allow installation of Express E-ZPass lanes. 14 Murrysville 22 Blairsville Sheffield D r. 66 12 BUS Sharon, Beaver Valley 66 Youngstown Expressway Harrison City 993 9 BUS Greensburg 376 15 66 422 Butler 8 Jeannette 130 Greensburg 376 6 Irwin 30 Greensburg 17 Mt. Jackson 108 New Castle Mainline Toll Zone 4 Mainline Toll Zone West Newton 136 Greensburg 20 New Galilee 168 Moravia 1 Erie Arona Rd. 351 Butler Ligonier Murrysville New Kensington Johnstown Greensburg 119 19 0 26 Elwood City ALLEGHENY 28 PITTSBURGH IRWIN DONEGAL 711 SOMERSET VALLEY 22 57 30 NEW STANTON 601 48 67 New Stanton Service Plaza 91 110 N.Somerset Service Plaza Allegheny Tunnel Warrendale Toll Plaza Allegheny River Allegheny Gateway Toll Plaza (Eastbound Only)* 75 Beaver River Beaver 49 To Central Section 76 70 76 Ohio 2 30 78 NEW BEAVER CRANBERRY BUTLER 112 of the map CASTLE 18 VALLEY 28 VALLEY 70 119 31 10 13 8 39 29 79 376 Darlington 551 Beaver
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
    Bedford County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan December 18, 2007 Adopted by the Bedford County Board of Commissioners Prepared by the Bedford County Planning Commission With technical assistance provided by This plan was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program, Environmental Stewardship fund, under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Intentionally Blank Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................1-1 Plan Purpose and Value Planning Process Plan Overview by Chapter Setting and Study Area.........................................................................................................................2-1 Regional Setting County Characteristic and Trends Major Communities and Corridors Significant and Sizable Features Development and Conservation Policy Open Space Resources.............................................................................................................. 3-1 Sensitive Natural Resources Resources for Rural Industries Resources for Rural Character Regulation and Protection of Natural Resources Conclusions and Options Parks & Recreation Facilities ................................................................................................... 4-1 State Parks and Recreation Resources Local Public Park and Recreation Facility Assessment Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Spirit Leveling in Maryland 1896 to 1911, Inclusive
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR f . BTJIAETIN 563 t RESULTS OF SPIRIT LEVELING IN MARYLAND 1896 TO 1911, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER Work done in cooperation with the State through the Maryland Geological Survey William Bullock Clark, State Geologist WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction. ............................................................... 5 Cooperation.......................................................... 6 Previous publication................... : ...........................".. 5 Personnel............................................................. 5 Classification......................................................... 5 Bench marks......................................................... 6 Datum............................................................... 6 Topographic maps.................................................... 7 Precise.leveling.......................................................... 8 Washington quadrangle (Montgomery County)........................... 8 Primary leveling......................................................... 10 Barclay, Betterton, Cecilton, Chestertown, Choptank (30/), Crapo, Cris- field, Deal Island, Denton, Dover (3(X), Drum Point, Harrington, Hur- lock, Nanticoke, Ocean City, Oxford, Pittsville, Princess Anne, Salis­ bury, Seaford, Snow Hill, St. Michaels, and Tolchester (3(X) quadrangles (Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Annes, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomicp, and Worcester
    [Show full text]
  • Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER
    JJJn'IWi'li jMlIipii ill ^ANGLER/ Ran a Looks A Bulltrog SEPTEMBER 1936 7 OFFICIAL STATE September, 1936 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER Vol.5 No. 9 C'^IP-^ '" . : - ==«rs> PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS HI Five cents a copy — 50 cents a year OLIVER M. DEIBLER Commissioner of Fisheries C. R. BULLER 1 1 f Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor 111 South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MEMBERS OF BOARD OLIVER M. DEIBLER, Chairman Greensburg iii MILTON L. PEEK Devon NOTE CHARLES A. FRENCH Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER Elwood City should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either HARRY E. WEBER by check or money order payable to the Common­ Philipsburg wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL 111 Johnstown EDGAR W. NICHOLSON PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ Philadelphia tions and photos of catches from its readers. Pro­ KENNETH A. REID per credit will be given to contributors. Connellsville All contributors returned if accompanied by first H. R. STACKHOUSE class postage. Secretary to Board =*KT> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 5 No. 9 SEPTEMBER, 1936 *ANGLER7 WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT STREAM POLLUTION By GROVER C. LADNER Deputy Attorney General and President, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen PORTSMEN need not be told that stream pollution is a long uphill fight.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Report Bedford County Planning Commission
    2014 ANNUAL REPORT BEDFORD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION March, 2015 Fred Temke, Chair Larry Wright, Vice-Chair Ernest Fuller Mary Stanley Rose Hoffman Wayne Koontz Charles Swartzwelder Joseph Barefoot Stephen Lambert 2014 ANNUAL REPORT BEDFORD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR This was a year of transition and the beginning of movement towards the completion of several planning efforts important to the County. Terry Stacey took over from Pandora Wertz in January as CDBG Administrator, and immediately tackled the Woodbury Water Line Replacement Project. More than ½ mile of line will be replaced, solving long-term problems with the delivery of drinking water to residents. The completion of construction is expected early in 2015. The Planning Commission was also involved with the early stages of planning on updates for several important countywide planning efforts, including: County Comprehensive Plan (adopted 2006) – major update County Hazard Mitigation Plan (adopted 2012) – major update County Natural Heritage Inventory (adopted 1998) – major update County Municipal Waste Management Plan (adopted 2011)—minor update Regional Community Economic Development Strategy (CEDS; adopted 2012)—major update Transportation efforts included participating in the completion of the 2015 – 2018 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and assisting with updates to the National Highway System (NHS) and the Federal Functional Classification System. The Pike 2 Bike corridor project also advanced in 2014. An Economic Impact Analysis was completed by Fourth Economy, Inc. and adopted by the Bedford and Fulton County Boards of Commissioners. The study provided clear evidence of significant economic impact if the 8.5 miles of abandoned Pennsylvania Turnpike and two tunnels are rehabilitated for recreational use.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania
    Elton 243 13A Road Ithaca Harford 36 54A 226 220 Dayton 390 14 79 11 41 80° 30’ 80° 15’ 80° 00’ 79° 45’ 79° 30’ Toll 79° 15’ 79° 00’ 78° 45’ 78° 30’Machias 78° 15’ 78° 00’ 77° 45’ 77° 30’ 77° 15’ 77° 00’ 76° 45’ 76° 30’ 76° 15’ 76° 00’ 75° 45’ 75° 30’ 75° 15’ 75° 00’ 74° 45’ 74° 30’ Houghton 53 414 5 38 21 Haskinville 327 26 A B C D E F G H J K 3 L M N 1 O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z To Buffalo East Otto Rushford Arkport Avoca 36 2 54 Hammondsport Caroline 219 Caneadea 3 96B Whitney 60 83 Hamlet South 62 243 Watkins 10 20 Cassadaga 240 98 Birdsall 10 415 37 13 79 Point 7 90 Dayton 16 2 86 35 7 Glen 3 Montour 228 THESE Bloomville Bear 322 5 Wesley Lake 41 12 TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION28 MAP Lakes 353 242 17 79 Barcelona Lake Belfast 3 Falls Danby Center Lisle Triangle 206 Unadilla Franklin Cassadaga 6 34 329 Newfield Lisle 60 Howard Richford 11 357 Tom Wolf, Governor 1 1 2 19 Bath Townsend 224 QUICK RESPONSE 8 Greene CoventryPA Sidney PA 5 5 3 33 Hornell 38 Sonora 29 34 2 Whitney Point 41 10 Westfield Charlotte Cattaraugus Franklinville Odessa 206 Stockton 9 96 Yassmin Gramian, P.E., Secretary, Department of Transportation Center Cherry Ashford Almond 4 30 9 Creek Angelica 32 Speedsville Itaska visitPA.com41 Bainbridge visitPA.com STATE 17 7 226 Monterey 414 CODES N 394 Leon 8 42 39 5 8 88 9 Delhi Forsyth 21 86 Willseyville ROAD CLASSIFICATION AND ROUTE MARKERS KEY TO MAP SYMBOLS 61 6 New 36 3 Beaver Dams 7 20 PARKSAlbion 5 Nanticoke TRAFFIC INTERCHANGES 28 ? Hartfield 27 353 31 Alfred Savona 16 CAN BE USEDJenksville Glen 7 PASSENGER RAILROADS
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Juniata Subbasin Morrison Cove Survey
    090706-1008.qxd 9/12/06 8:49 AM Page 1 Publication 243 Juniata River Subbasin Small September 2006 Watershed Study: Morrison Cove A Water Quality and Biological Assessment, April 2005 - February 2006 The Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) completed a water quality survey in the Morrison Cove (Cove) region from April 2005 through February 2006 as part of the Year-2 small watershed study in the Juniata River Subbasin (Figure 1). The Year-1 survey of the entire Juniata Subbasin was conducted from June to TABLE OF CONTENTS November 2004 (LeFevre, 2005). SRBC selected the Morrison Cove region for Figure 1. Morrison Cove Location in the Juniata River Subbasin Introduction..................1 the more intensive Year-2 study based baseline for future groundwater studies on the data collected in the Year-1 and assist SRBC staff with project Description..................2 survey, and the fact that SRBC identified review activities. The Year-2 survey the Roaring Spring area in Morrison included quarterly water chemistry sample Other Studies..............2 - 3 Cove as a Potentially Stressed Area collection, discharge measurements, in 2005. and a macroinvertebrate community Methods - Data Collection........4 Two primary goals were established and habitat assessment. This report was for this Year-2 study. The first goal partially funded by a grant from the U.S. Methods - Data Analysis.........5 was to provide chemical, biological, and Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). habitat data to state and local government For more information on SRBC’s entities, watershed organizations, local Subbasin Survey Program, see reports Results and Discussion..........6 citizens, and other interested parties.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014
    PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014 What is Primitive Camping? Primitive camping is a simplistic style of camping. Campers hike, pedal or paddle to reach a location and spend the night without the presence of developed facilities. This primitive camping experience takes place off the beaten path, where piped water, restrooms and other amenities are not provided. You pack in all you need, exchanging a few conveniences for the solitude found in the back country setting. Fresh air, fewer people and out-of-the-way natural landscapes are some of the benefits of primitive camping. Once off the beaten path, however, additional advantages begin to surface such as a deeper awareness and greater appreciation of the outdoor world around you. Primitive camping also builds outdoor skills and fosters a gratifying sense of self-sufficiency. Where to Camp Pennsylvania has 2.2 million acres of state forest land with 2,500 miles of trails and 5,132 miles of Camping at rivers and streams winding through it. Hiking, biking and multi-use trails traverse most state forest districts and six districts have designated water trails that transect state forest land. Forest Districts State parks are not open to primitive camping. However, with the exception of William Penn State Forest, all state forest districts are open to this activity. Camping is not permitted in designated STATE FOREST DISTRICTS: natural areas or at vistas, trail heads, picnic areas and areas that are posted closed to camping. Bald Eagle State Forest (570) 922-3344 Contact a forest district office for specific information, maps and Camping Permits (if needed).
    [Show full text]