DOCSLIB.ORG

Waddle Ditch Rattlesnake Creek

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waddle Ditch Rattlesnake Creek Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05) Prepared for: Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District Prepared by: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Toledo, Ohio Version 1.0 Approved: June 29, 2021 This page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements Version 1.0 prepared and written by: Deanna Bobak Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4841 Monroe Street, Suite 103 Toledo, OH 43623 Brigitte Hisey Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District 1415 US 22 SW, Suite 500 Washington Court House, OH 43160 The Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) would like to acknowledge the collaboration of multiple partners in the preparation of this Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05). The Fayette SWCD appreciates those individuals and organizations that contributed background information, insight into objectives and projects for inclusion in this NPS-IS. Thank you to Rick Wilson, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Division of Surface Water, for guidance throughout the NPS-IS development process, as well as Jessica D’Ambrosio and the staff of The Nature Conservancy for providing modeling data generated by the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). This product or publication was financed in part or totally through a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through an assistance agreement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The contents and views, including any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations, contained in this product or publication are those of the authors and have not been subject to any Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency peer or administrative review and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or the United States Environmental Protection Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. Cover graphic: Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 USGS boundary . Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. i Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy Acronyms and Abbreviations The acronyms and abbreviations below are commonly used by organizations working to restore Ohio’s watersheds and are found throughout this document. Numbers §319 Section 319 of the Clean Water Act A ACPF Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework ALU Aquatic Life Use B BMP Best Management Practice C CAFO Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation CDL Cropland Data Layer CRP Conservation Reserve Program D DEM Digital Elevation Model DO Dissolved Oxygen E ECBP Eastern Corn Belt Plains EPT Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera – sensitive macroinvertebrate species EQIP Environmental Quality Incentives Program EWH Exceptional Warmwater Habitat F FOTG Field Office Technical Guide FLS Federally Listed Species FSA Farm Service Agency G GIS Geographic Information Systems H HAB Harmful Algal Bloom HSTS Home Sewage Treatment System HTF Hypoxia Task Force HUC Hydrologic Unit Code Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. ii Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy I IBI Index of Biotic Integrity ICI Invertebrate Community Index M MARB Mississippi/Atchafalaya River Basin MIwb Modified Index of Well Being MRBI Mississippi River Basin Initiative MWH Modified Warmwater Habitat N NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS Nonpoint Source NPS-IS Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service O OAC Ohio Administrative Code ODA Ohio Department of Agriculture ODH Ohio Department of Health ODNR Ohio Department of Natural Resources Ohio EPA Ohio Environmental Protection Agency OpTIS Operational Tillage Information System ORB Ohio River Basin ORBA Ohio River Basin Alliance OSU Ohio State University P PAD-US Protected Areas Database of the United States PCWP Paint Creek Watershed Project Q QHEI Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index R RM River Mile RPHF Ross, Pickaway, Highland, Fayette (Solid Waste District) S SWCD Soil and Water Conservation District T TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. iii Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy U USDA United States Department of Agriculture USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey V VRT Variable Rate Technology W WAP Watershed Action Plan WQS Water Quality Standards (Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1) WRP Wetlands Reserve Program WWH Warmwater Habitat Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. iv Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy Table of Contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................. i Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Report Background .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Profile & History ............................................................................................ 4 1.3 Public Participation and Involvement .............................................................................. 6 Chapter 2: HUC-12 Watershed Characterization and Assessment Summary ........................................ 8 2.1 Summary of HUC-12 Watershed Characterization .......................................................... 8 2.2 Summary of HUC-12 Biological Trends .......................................................................... 15 2.3 Summary of HUC-12 Pollution Causes and Associated Sources .................................... 18 2.4 Additional Information for Determining Critical Areas and Developing Implementation Strategies ....................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 3: Critical Area Conditions AND Restoration Strategies ....................................................... 20 3.1 Overview of Critical Areas ............................................................................................. 20 3.2 Critical Area #1: Conditions, Goals & Objectives for Prioritized Agricultural Lands ...... 21 3.3 Critical Area #2: Conditions, Goals & Objectives for Streambank and Riparian Restoration .................................................................................................................... 31 Chapter 4: Projects and Implementation Strategy ............................................................................ 37 4.1 Critical Area #1 Project and Implementation Strategy Overview Table ........................ 38 4.2 Critical Area #2 Project and Implementation Strategy Overview Table ........................ 41 Chapter 5: Works Cited ................................................................................................................... 42 Table of Figures Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 Overview ................................................................. 1 Paint Creek Watershed .............................................................................................................. 5 Location of the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 ........................................................ 5 Soils by Particle Size .................................................................................................................. 9 Political Boundaries in the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 .................................... 10 Land Use .................................................................................................................................. 11 Wetlands in the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 ..................................................... 12 Parks and Protected Lands ...................................................................................................... 13 Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 Critical Area Overview .......................................... 20 Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 Critical Area #1 ...................................................... 22 Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 Critical Area #2 ...................................................... 31 Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. v Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District CEC Project 303-378 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy Table of Tables Nine Elements for Watershed Plans and Implementation Projects .......................................... 2 Sub-watersheds in the Headwaters Rattlesnake Creek HUC-10 ............................................... 6 Small Tributary Characteristics .................................................................................................. 8 Estimated Animal Counts in the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 ........................... 11 Land Use Classifications in the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 .............................. 12 Threatened and Endangered Species in Fayette, Clinton and Highland Counties .................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Paint Creek Watershed 2006
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Biological and Water Quality Study of the Paint Creek Watershed 2006 Hydrologic Units 05060003 010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090, 100. Clinton, Fayette, Greene, Highland, Madison, and Ross Counties OHIO EPA Technical Report EAS/2008-1-2 August 29, 2008 Ted Strickland, Governor, State of Ohio Chris Korleski, Director DSW/EAS/2008-1-2 Paint Creek TSD August 29, 2008 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Paint Creek Watershed 2006 Clinton, Fayette, Greene, Highland, Madison, and Ross Counties August 29, 2008 OHIO EPA Technical Report EAS/2008-1-2 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Mailing Address: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Lazarus Government Center P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Ted Strickland Governor, State of Ohio Chris Korleski Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency i DSW/EAS/2008-1-2 Paint Creek TSD August 29, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Notice To Users .............................................................................................................................xv Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................... xvii Foreword.................................................................................................................................... xviii Introduction......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Paint Creek Watershed
    Total Maximum Daily July 2012 Loads for the Paint Creek Watershed Final Report July 19, 2012 John R. Kasich, Governor Mary Taylor, Lt. Governor Scott J. Nally, Director Photo caption: Paint Creek at State Route 753 upstream of Greenfield in Fayette County, Ohio. Ohio EPA received financial assistance for this work from U.S. EPA and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Paint Creek Watershed TMDLs Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Clean Water Act Requirement to Address Impaired Waters .................................. 1 1.2 Public Involvement ....................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Organization of Report ................................................................................................. 7 2 Characteristics and Expectations of the Watershed ....................................................... 8 2.1 Watershed Characteristics ........................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Population ........................................................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Land Use ......................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3 Point Source Discharges .................................................................................. 9 2.1.4 Public Drinking Water Supplies .......................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (Usas): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio
    Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (USAs): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio Colin Plank, Scott Zengel, Heidi Hinkeldey, Elaine Inouye, William Holton, Jeffery Dahlin, and Jacqueline Michel Research Planning, Inc., 1121 Park Street, Columbia, SC 29201, [email protected], 803-256-7322 (voice); 803-254-6445 (fax); and Christina Sames and Samuel Hall, Office of Pipeline Safety, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) is required to identify areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage in the event of a hazardous liquid pipeline accident. Pipeline operators that can affect "unusually sensitive areas" (USAs) must develop and follow an integrity management program to assess and evaluate the integrity of their pipelines. After extensive consultation with experts, government agencies, and other stakeholders, a process was developed to identify USAs for drinking water and ecological resources. In general the USA identification process involves selecting a subset of USA candidates from the larger group of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs), and then applying various filter criteria to the candidates to determine final USAs. For drinking water USAs this means identifying potentially sensitive public water systems (PWS), specifically surface water intakes and ground water wells, and subjecting them to filter
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    information t o u s e r s This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of usefs indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silurian of Central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, Palaeoenvironments and Palaeoecology
    The Silurian of central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology FRANK R. ETTENSOHN, R. THOMAS LIERMAN, CHARLES E. MASON, WILLIAM M. ANDREWS, R. TODD HENDRICKS, DANIEL J. PHELPS & LAWRENCE A. GORDON ETTENSOHN, F.R., LIERMAN, R.T., MASON, C.E., ANDREWS, W.M., HENDRICKS, R.T., PHELPS, D.J. & GORDON, L.A., 2013:04:26. The Silurian of central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 44, 159-189. ISSN 0810-8889. Silurian rocks in Kentucky are exposed on the eastern and western flanks of the Cincinnati Arch, a large-wavelength cratonic structure separating the Appalachian foreland basin from the intracratonic Illinois Basin. The Cincinnati Arch area experienced uplift during latest Ordovician-early Silurian time, so that the exposed Silurian section is relatively thin due to onlap and post- Silurian erosional truncation on the arch. On both flanks of the arch, dolomitic carbonates predominate, but the section on the eastern side reflects a more shale-rich ramp that faced eastern Appalachian source areas. In the Silurian section on the western side of the arch, which apparently developed across a platform-like isolation-accommodation zone, shales are rare except dur- ing some highstand episodes, and rocks in the area reflect deposition across a broad, low-gradient shelf area, interrupted by structurally controlled topographic breaks. Using the progression of interpreted depositional environments and nearshore faunal communities, a relative sea-level curve, which parallels those of previous workers, was generated for the section in Kentucky. While the curve clearly shows the influence of glacial eustasy, distinct indications of the far-field, flexural influence of Taconian and Salinic tectonism are also present.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Pa Element, OSU 41751, X 28, Collection
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Accessing theUMI World’s Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8820S06 Taxonomy and biostratigraphic significance of Wenlockian and Ludlovian (Silurian) conodonts in the midcontinent outcrop area, North America Kleffner, Mark Alan, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Sectional Meetings Details of Technical Meetings Follow
    Sectional Meetings Details of technical meetings follow. See map for building locations. Bus- iness meetings are scheduled for each section. An important item of business is the election of officers. A. ZOOLOGY MORNING SESSION 1 KAUKE HALL F. LEE ST. JOHN, PRESIDING EFFECTS OF CALCIUM MODULATING DRUGS ON INSECT CENTRAL NERVOUS TISSUE. Kevin M. Hoffman & George F. Shambaugh, Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research & Development CEnter, Wooster, OHIO 44691 9:00 Drugs which modulate the movements of calcium ions into or within cells were perfused over the desheathed, last abdominal ganglion of the cockroach, Nauphoeta cinerea (Olivier). Synaptic transmission, endogenous spike activity, summed post-synaptic potentials and ganglionic polarization were measured. Sodium nitroprusside in low concentrations caused repetitive firing of giant interneurons after faradic stimulation. CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE NUCLEUS BASALIS AND THE ARCHISTRIATUM IN THE MALLARD. Patrick Work, Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242. 9:15 Research reported here is part of a study of the feeding mechanism of the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) which is being conducted at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands. It was done through a Kent State University-Leiden University student exchange program in the summer of 1980. The research consisted of a neuroanatomical and histochemical investigation of the relationship between the forebrain nuclei basalis and archistriatum anterior. These are believed to be important elements in neural control of the feeding mecha- nism in the duck. Anatomical connections between these nuclei were studied with the aid of horseradish peroxidase injected into the archistriatum anterior nucleus, Peroxidase-labeled cells were found only in the most medial portions of the nucleus basalis from the level of the posterior commissure to the rostral border of the archistriatum anterior.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotechnical Report
    Geotechnical Exploration Report The Freese Center State Route 598 Galion, Ohio 44833 Prepared for Galion Port Authority P.O. Box 761 Galion, Ohio 44833 Daniel E Karch, E.I. Project Manager Prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. 4960 Vulcan Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43228 Paul S. Hundley, P.E. July 31, 2020 Geotechnical Dept. Manager/Principal Consultant PSI Project No. 01021746 PSI Project Number: 01021746 The Freese Center July 21, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................................................................. 2 2 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................... 4 2.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 4 2.2 SITE GEOLOGY .................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North American Geology
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 684 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY FOB 1917 WITH SUBJECT INDEX BY JOHN M. NICKLES i WASHINGTON.' GOVEENMENT PHINTING OFFICE 191 5 CONTENTS. Introduction................................................................. 3 Serials examined........................................................... 5 Bibliography............................................................... 9 Outline of subject headinga................................................. 89 Index.................................................................... 93 Lists..................................................................... 135 Chemical analyses...................................................... 135 Minerals described..................................................... 136 Rocks described.. '...................................................... 138 Geologic formations described........................................... 139 2 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY FOR 1917, WITH SUBJECT INDEX. By JOHN M. NICKLES. INTRODUCTION. The bibliography of North American geology, including paleon­ tology, petrology, and mineralogy, for the year 1917 follows the plan and arrangement of its immediate predecessors. It includes publications bearing on the geology of the Continent of North America and adjoining islands; also Panama and the Hawaiian Islands. Papers by American writers on the geology of other parts of the world are not included.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Problems and the Construction Aggregate Industry
    State of Michigan ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AND Department of Natural Resources THE CONSTRUCTION AGGREGATE Geological Survey Division INDUSTRY Miscellany 1 Papers presented at Sixth Forum on Geology by William E. Hole, Jr., President of Industrial Minerals American Aggregate Company, Greenville, Ohio Theme II: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION STONES AND MINERALS Abstract Edited by The theme of the 70’s will be the environment. The W. A. Kneller construction aggregates industry, already in difficulty with local zoning control, will be further affected by the Cosponsored by requirements of the "new thing". However, it may well Department of Geology and Mineralogy, University of be that proposed legislation could be the vehicle which Michigan Department of Geology, University of Toledo not only satisfies the wants of the environmentalist but Convened at Horace H. Rackham Building also recognizes the need for a viable construction University of Michigan aggregates industry. Ann Arbor At the beginning of each new decade, wise men attempt April 2 and 3, 1970 to forecast the highlights of the upcoming ten years. In the past, there has been a lack of consensus upon the part of this honored group. However, there seems to be a general agreement upon the part of the Contents prognosticating community this year that the "Theme of THEME II: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION STONES the 70’s" will be the environment. AND MINERALS The actions of the Federal government generally reflect ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AND THE the concerns of the public body. Seldom has our CONSTRUCTION AGGREGATE INDUSTRY, William government realigned itself so dramatically as it has with E. Hole, Jr........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopic and Chemical Composition of Inorganic and Organic Water-Quality Samples from the Mississippi River Basin, 1997–98
    Isotopic and Chemical Composition of Inorganic and Organic Water-Quality Samples from the Mississippi River Basin, 1997–98 By William A. Battaglin, Carol Kendall, Cecily C.Y.Chang, Steve R. Silva, and Donald H. Campbell U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4095 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY GULF OF MEXICO PROGRAM Denver, Colorado 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Box 25046, Mail Stop 415 Box 25286 Denver Federal Center Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0046 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Problem........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Objectives and Hypotheses.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]