DOCSLIB.ORG

OFR 2011-1, Central Ohio Geology Core Outcrop Workshop II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OFR 2011-1, Central Ohio Geology Core Outcrop Workshop II DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Chief Open-File Report 2011-1 Central Ohio’s Geology in Core and Outcrop Workshop II Hosted by Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey Sponsored by Ohio Geological Society Horace R. Collins Laboratory Delaware, Ohio April 20, 2011 Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-1 Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693 2011 Agenda 9:00–9:05 A.M. Welcome 9:05–9:30 A.M. Geological Survey’s geohazards and geologic mapping programs 9:30–10:00 A.M. Central Ohio geology 10:00–10:15 A.M. Break 10:15–11:00 A.M. Group A exercise: The utility of Geological Survey map products Group B exercise: Core description 101; anatomy of a fact sheet 11:00–11:45 A.M. Group A exercise: Core description 101; anatomy of a fact sheet Group B exercise: The utility of Geological Survey map products 11:45–12:30 P.M. Lunch provided 12:30–2:00 P.M. Group A exercise: Soil Classifi cations—Unifi ed, AASHTO, USDA, ODOT’s version of AASHTO, and Rock Mass Classifi cation ASTM Group B exercise: Utility of fact sheets in fi eld-like settings; group discussion 2:00–2:15 P.M. Break 2:15–3:45 P.M. Group A exercise: Utility of fact sheets in fi eld-like settings; group discussion Group B exercise: Soil Classifi cations—Unifi ed, AASHTO, USDA, ODOT’s version of AASHTO, and Rock Mass Classifi cation ASTM 3:45–4:00 P.M. Questions; workshop evaluation www.OhioGeology.com DISCLAIMER The information contained herein has not been reviewed for technical accuracy and conformity with current ODNR Division of Geological Survey standards for published or open-fi le materials. The ODNR Division of Geological Survey does not guarantee this information to be free from errors, omissions, or inaccuracies and disclaims any responsibility or liability for interpretations or decisions based thereon. Cover image: Berea Sandstone-Sunbury Shale unconformable contact with sulfi de mineralization. Recommended citation: Schumacher, G.A., Angle, M.P., Mott, Brian, and Schmidt, M.A., 2011, Central Ohio's geology in core and outcrop workshop II: Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Open-fi le Report 2011-1, 44 p. Co-Coordinators Brian Mott Mort Schmidt DLZ Ohio Cox-Colvin & Associates, Inc. 6121 Huntley Road 7750 Corporate Blvd. Columbus, OH 43229 Plain City, OH 43064 (614) 848-4141 (614) 526-2040 [email protected] [email protected] Mike Angle Greg Schumacher Ohio Department of Natural Resources Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey Division of Geological Survey 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-2 H. R. Collins Laboratory Columbus, OH 43229-6693 3307 South Old State Road (614) 265-6602 Delaware, OH 43015 [email protected] (740) 548-7348 [email protected] Mac Swinford Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-1 Columbus, OH 43229-6693 (614) 265-6473 [email protected] Speakers Division of Geological Survey Introduction to Geohazards and Geologic Central Ohio Geology Mapping Programs Mac Swinford Mike Angle Assistant Chief Supervisor, Geologic Mapping Group Ohio Department of Natural Resources Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey Division of Geological Survey 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-1 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-2 Columbus, OH 43229-6693 Columbus, OH 43229-6693 (614) 265-6473 (614) 265-6602 [email protected] [email protected] Contents Ohio Department of Transportation soil and rock classifi cation .................................................................. 1 Quick reference for visual description of soils ....................................................................................... 1 Quick reference guide for rock description ............................................................................................ 3 Rock type ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Rock core photo examples ..................................................................................................................... 8 Fact sheet source material .............................................................................................................................. 10 Geologic time scale ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Glacial sand-and-gravel deposits .................................................................................................................... 12 Glacial lacustrine deposits .............................................................................................................................. 14 Glacial till ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 Cuyahoga Formation ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Sunbury Shale ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Berea Sandstone ............................................................................................................................................. 22 Bedford Shale ................................................................................................................................................. 24 Ohio Shale ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 Olentangy Shale ............................................................................................................................................. 28 Delaware Limestone ...................................................................................................................................... 30 Columbus Limestone ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Maps Bedrock Geologic Map of Ohio .................................................................................................................... 34 Glacial Map of Ohio ..................................................................................................................................... 36 Shaded Bedrock-Topography Map of Ohio .................................................................................................. 38 Known and Probable Karst in Ohio ............................................................................................................. 40 Shaded Drift-Thickness Map of Ohio ........................................................................................................... 42 CENTRAL OHIO’S GEOLOGY IN CORE AND OUTCROP WORKSHOP II 1 Ohio Department of Transportation Soil and Rock Classifi cation* QUICK REFERENCE FOR VISUAL DESCRIPTION OF SOILS (1) STRENGTH OF SOIL Noncohesive (granular) soils—Compactness Description Blows per ft. Very loose ≤4 Loose 5–10 Medium dense 11–30 Dense 31–50 Very dense >50 Strength of soil: Cohesive (fi ne-grained) soils—Consistency Description Qu (TSF) Blows per ft. Hand manipulation Very soft <0.25 <2 Easily penetrates 2 in. by fi st Soft 0.25–0.5 2–4 Easily penetrates 2 in. by thumb Medium stiff 0.5–1.0 5–8 Penetrates by thumb with moderate effort Stiff 1.0–2.0 9–15 Readily indents by thumb, but does not penetrate Very stiff 2.0–4.0 16–30 Readily indents by thumbnail Hard >4.0 >30 Indents with diffi culty by thumbnail (2) COLOR If a color is a uniform color throughout, the term is single, modifi ed by an adjective such as light or dark. If the predominate color is shaded by a secondary color, the secondary color precedes the primary color. If two major and distinct colors are swirled throughout the soil, the colors are modifi ed by the term mottled. (3) PRIMARY COMPONENT Use description from Classifi cation of Soils chart on p. 2. (4) COMPONENT MODIFIERS (5) SOIL ORGANIC CONTENT Description Percentage by weight Description Percentage by weight Trace 0–10 Slightly organic 2–4 Little 10–20 Moderately organic 4–10 Some 20–35 Highly organic >10 “And” 35–50 (6) RELATIVE VISUAL MOISTURE Criteria Description Cohesive soil Noncohesive soil Dry Powdery; cannot be rolled; water content well below the plastic limit No moisture present Leaves very little moisture when pressed between fi ngers; crumbles at or be- Internal moisture, but no to little Damp 1 fore rolled to ⁄8 in.; water content below plastic limit surface moisture 1 Leaves small amounts of moisture when pressed between fi ngers; rolled to ⁄8 Free water on surface, moist Moist in. or smaller before crumbling; water content above plastic limit to –3% of (shiny) apperance the liquid limit Very mushy; rolled multiple times to 1⁄ in. or smaller before crumbles; near Voids fi lled with free water; can be Wet 8 or above the liquid limit poured from split spoon *Pages 1–9 of this booklet modifi ed from Specifi cations for Geotechnical Explorations, Appendix A—Soil and Bedrock Classifi cation (p. 109–122), published by the Ohio Department of Transportation (2008). 2 CENTRAL OHIO’S GEOLOGY IN CORE AND OUTCROP WORKSHOP II CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS Ohio Department of Transportation (The classifi cation of a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terran Cornoration Environmental Services
    Page 11 Terran Cornoration Environmental Services Mr. James Yskamp, Esq. February 1, 2018 Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services 159 South Main Street, Suite 1030 Akron, Ohio 44308 RE: Technical Report Review: "Evaluation of Groundwater Impacts, Dewatering of Proposed Enon Quarry, Clark County, Ohio " Dear Mr. Y skamp, I, Brent E. Huntsman, CPG, President and Principal Hydrogeologist ofTerran Corporation (Terran) was retained by Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services to review and comment upon the hydrogeologic characterization and predicted dewatering effects to the water resources of Mad River Township, Clark County, OH as described in a groundwater model report prepared for a mining permit modification. This report review was to include an evaluation of the aquifer response and hydraulic performance predicted by the model simulations of the groundwater system; the magnitude and extent of a cone of depression resulting from dewatering various limestone quarry pits. The purpose of my review is to provide a letter report summarizing my expert opinions regarding the adequacy of the groundwater model to appropriately simulate dewatering effects upon the local groundwater regime. All opinions in this report are based upon my review of existing information (developed through the litigation process in this case or in the public record) together with my 43-years of experience in applied hydrogeology, specifically aquifer characterization and water resources development. My current curriculum vita is included with this letter report as Attachment 2. These opinions are expressed to a reasonable degree of scientific and professional certainty. I reserve the right to supplement this report and opinions as additional material becomes available through the litigation process or continued review of public literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Delaware's Wildlife Habitats
    CHAPTER 2 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE HABITATS 2 - 1 Delaware Wildlife Action Plan Contents Chapter 2, Part 1: DELAWARE’S ECOLOGICAL SETTING ................................................................. 8 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 9 Delaware Habitats in a Regional Context ..................................................................................... 10 U.S. Northeast Region ............................................................................................................. 10 U.S. Southeast Region .............................................................................................................. 11 Delaware Habitats in a Watershed Context ................................................................................. 12 Delaware River Watershed .......................................................................................................13 Chesapeake Bay Watershed .....................................................................................................13 Inland Bays Watershed ............................................................................................................ 14 Geology and Soils ......................................................................................................................... 17 Soils .......................................................................................................................................... 17 EPA
    [Show full text]
  • Waddle Ditch Rattlesnake Creek
    Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05) Prepared for: Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District Prepared by: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Toledo, Ohio Version 1.0 Approved: June 29, 2021 This page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements Version 1.0 prepared and written by: Deanna Bobak Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4841 Monroe Street, Suite 103 Toledo, OH 43623 Brigitte Hisey Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District 1415 US 22 SW, Suite 500 Washington Court House, OH 43160 The Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) would like to acknowledge the collaboration of multiple partners in the preparation of this Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05). The Fayette SWCD appreciates those individuals and organizations that contributed background information, insight into objectives and projects for inclusion in this NPS-IS. Thank you to Rick Wilson, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Division of Surface Water, for guidance throughout the NPS-IS development process, as well as Jessica D’Ambrosio and the staff of The Nature Conservancy for providing modeling data generated by the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). This product or publication was financed in part or totally through a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through an assistance agreement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The contents and views, including any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations, contained in this product or publication are those of the authors and have not been subject to any Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency peer or administrative review and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or the United States Environmental Protection Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
    [Show full text]
  • SP20 Delaware Piedmont Geology
    Delaware Piedmont Geology including a guide to the rocks of Red Clay Valley RESEARCH DELAWARE SERVICEGEOLOGICAL SURVEY EXPLORATION Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware Special Publication No. 20 By Margaret O. Plank and William S. Schenck 106/1500/298/C Delaware Piedmont Geology Including a guide to the rocks of Red Clay Valley Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware Special Publication No. 20 Margaret O. Plank and William S. Schenck 1998 Contents FOREWORD . v INTRODUCTION . vii Acknowledgments . viii BASIC FACTS ABOUT ROCKS . 1–13 Our Earth . 1 Crust . 1 Mantle . 2 Core. 2 Plate Tectonics . 3 Minerals . 5 Rocks . 6 Igneous Rocks . 6 Sedimentary Rocks. 8 Metamorphic Rocks . 9 Deformation. 11 Time . 12 READING THE ROCKS: A HISTORY OF THE DELAWARE PIEDMONT . 15–29 Geologic Setting . 15 Piedmont . 15 Fall Line. 17 Atlantic Coastal Plain. 17 Rock Units of the Delaware Piedmont . 20 Wilmington Complex . 20 Wissahickon Formation . 21 Setters Formation & Cockeysville Marble . 22 Geologic Map for Reference . 23 Baltimore Gneiss . 24 Deformation in the Delaware Piedmont . 24 The Piedmont and Plate Tectonics . 27 Red Clay Valley: Table of Contents iii A GUIDE TO THE ROCKS ALONG THE TRACK . 31–54 Before We Begin . 31 Geologic Points of Interest . 31 A Southeast of Greenbank . 35 B Workhouse Quarry at Greenbank. 36 C Red Clay Creek and Brandywine Springs Park . 36 D Brandywine Springs to Faulkland Road . 38 E Hercules Golf Course . 39 F Rock Cut at Wooddale . 40 G Wissahickon Formation at Wooddale. 43 H Quarries at Wooddale. 43 I Red Clay Creek Flood Plain . 44 J Mount Cuba . 44 K Mount Cuba Picnic Grove .
    [Show full text]
  • Convective Isolation of Hadean Mantle Reservoirs Through Archean Time
    Convective isolation of Hadean mantle reservoirs through Archean time Jonas Tuscha,1, Carsten Münkera, Eric Hasenstaba, Mike Jansena, Chris S. Mariena, Florian Kurzweila, Martin J. Van Kranendonkb,c, Hugh Smithiesd, Wolfgang Maiere, and Dieter Garbe-Schönbergf aInstitut für Geologie und Mineralogie, Universität zu Köln, 50674 Köln, Germany; bSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; cAustralian Center for Astrobiology, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; dDepartment of Mines, Industry Regulations and Safety, Geological Survey of Western Australia, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia; eSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom; and fInstitut für Geowissenschaften, Universität zu Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany Edited by Richard W. Carlson, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC, and approved November 18, 2020 (received for review June 19, 2020) Although Earth has a convecting mantle, ancient mantle reservoirs anomalies in Eoarchean rocks was interpreted as evidence that that formed within the first 100 Ma of Earth’s history (Hadean these rocks lacked a late veneer component (5). Conversely, the Eon) appear to have been preserved through geologic time. Evi- presence of some late accreted material is required to explain the dence for this is based on small anomalies of isotopes such as elevated abundances of highly siderophile elements (HSEs) in 182W, 142Nd, and 129Xe that are decay products of short-lived nu- Earth’s modern silicate mantle (9). Notably, some Archean rocks clide systems. Studies of such short-lived isotopes have typically with apparent pre-late veneer like 182W isotope excesses were focused on geological units with a limited age range and therefore shown to display HSE concentrations that are indistinguishable only provide snapshots of regional mantle heterogeneities.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Landscape Assessment of the Puncheon Run Site
    APPENDIX B LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT OF THE PUNCHEON RUN SITE Archaeology of the Puncheon Run Site (7K-C-51) Volume II: Technical Appendices LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT OF THE PUNCHEON RUN SITE By Justine Woodard McKnight Consulting Ethnobotanist 708 Faircastle Avenue Severna Park, Maryland 21146 THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037 Submitted To U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration and DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs Bureau of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Prepared For DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Highways Location and Environmental Studies Office g Eugene E. Abbott Director of Planning 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE List of Figures........................................................... B-iii List of Tables ........................................................... B-iii List of Plates............................................................ B-iii I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................... B-1 A. Project Background ................................................... B-1 B. Research Context ..................................................... B-1 1. Archaeobotanical Analyses .......................................... B-3 2. Review of Ethnohistoric Literature .................................... B-4 3. Landscape Assessment .............................................. B-4 C. Navigating This Report ................................................ B-5 II. LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Eoarchean, >3.95 Ga, Nulliak Supracrustal
    ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Geology of the Eoarchean, > 3.95 Ga, Nulliak supracrustal rocks in the Saglek Block, northern Labrador, Canada: The oldest geological evidence for plate tectonics Tsuyoshi Komiya, Shinji Yamamoto, Shogo Aoki, Yusuke Sawaki, Akira Ishikawa, Takayuki Tashiro, Keiko Koshida, Masanori Shimojo, Kazumasa Aoki, Kenneth D. Collerson PII: S0040-1951(15)00269-3 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.05.003 Reference: TECTO 126618 To appear in: Tectonophysics Received date: 30 December 2014 Revised date: 30 April 2015 Accepted date: 17 May 2015 Please cite this article as: Komiya, Tsuyoshi, Yamamoto, Shinji, Aoki, Shogo, Sawaki, Yusuke, Ishikawa, Akira, Tashiro, Takayuki, Koshida, Keiko, Shimojo, Masanori, Aoki, Kazumasa, Collerson, Kenneth D., Geology of the Eoarchean, > 3.95 Ga, Nulliak supracrustal rocks in the Saglek Block, northern Labrador, Canada: The oldest geological evidence for plate tectonics, Tectonophysics (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.05.003 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Geology of the Eoarchean, >3.95 Ga, Nulliak supracrustal rocks in the Saglek Block, northern Labrador, Canada: The oldest geological evidence for plate tectonics Tsuyoshi Komiya1*, Shinji Yamamoto1, Shogo Aoki1, Yusuke Sawaki2, Akira Ishikawa1, Takayuki Tashiro1, Keiko Koshida1, Masanori Shimojo1, Kazumasa Aoki1 and Kenneth D.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE V
    GSA GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE v. 4.0 CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST HIST. ANOM. (Ma) ANOM. CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 66.0 541 CALABRIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE* 1.8 31 C31 MAASTRICHTIAN 252 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 Lopin- 254 32 C32 72.1 635 2A C2A PIACENZIAN WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 3.6 gian 33 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN CAPITANIAN NEOPRO- 5 C3 CAMPANIAN Guada- 265 750 CRYOGENIAN 5.3 80 C33 WORDIAN TEROZOIC 3A MESSINIAN LATE lupian 269 C3A 83.6 ROADIAN 272 850 7.2 SANTONIAN 4 KUNGURIAN C4 86.3 279 TONIAN CONIACIAN 280 4A Cisura- C4A TORTONIAN 90 89.8 1000 1000 PERMIAN ARTINSKIAN 10 5 TURONIAN lian C5 93.9 290 SAKMARIAN STENIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 296 SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 ASSELIAN 299 5A 100 100 300 GZHELIAN 1200 C5A 13.8 LATE 304 KASIMOVIAN 307 1250 MESOPRO- 15 LANGHIAN ECTASIAN 5B C5B ALBIAN MIDDLE MOSCOVIAN 16.0 TEROZOIC 5C C5C 110 VANIAN 315 PENNSYL- 1400 EARLY 5D C5D MIOCENE 113 320 BASHKIRIAN 323 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 1500 CALYMMIAN 6 C6 APTIAN LATE 20 120 331 6A C6A 20.4 EARLY 1600 M0r 126 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 MIDDLE VISEAN MISSIS- M3 BARREMIAN SIPPIAN STATHERIAN C6C 23.0 6C 130 M5 CRETACEOUS 131 347 1750 HAUTERIVIAN 7 C7 CARBONIFEROUS EARLY TOURNAISIAN 1800 M10 134 25 7A C7A 359 8 C8 CHATTIAN VALANGINIAN M12 360 140 M14 139 FAMENNIAN OROSIRIAN 9 C9 M16 28.1 M18 BERRIASIAN 2000 PROTEROZOIC 10 C10 LATE
    [Show full text]
  • PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016
    PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016 Series/ Age Series/ Age Erathem/ System/ Age Epoch Stage/Age Ma Epoch Stage/Age Ma Era Period Ma GSSP/ GSSA GSSP GSSP Eonothem Eon Eonothem Erathem Period Eonothem Period Eon Era System System Eon Erathem Era 237.0 541 Anthropocene * Ladinian Ediacaran Middle 241.5 Neo- 635 Upper Anisian Cryogenian 4.2 ka 246.8 proterozoic 720 Holocene Middle Olenekian Tonian 8.2 ka Triassic Lower 249.8 1000 Lower Mesozoic Induan Stenian 11.8 ka 251.9 Meso- 1200 Upper Changhsingian Ectasian 126 ka Lopingian 254.2 proterozoic 1400 “Ionian” Wuchiapingian Calymmian Quaternary Pleisto- 773 ka 259.8 1600 cene Calabrian Capitanian Statherian 1.80 Guada- 265.1 Proterozoic 1800 Gelasian Wordian Paleo- Orosirian 2.58 lupian 268.8 2050 Piacenzian Roadian proterozoic Rhyacian Pliocene 3.60 272.3 2300 Zanclean Kungurian Siderian 5.33 Permian 282.0 2500 Messinian Artinskian Neo- 7.25 Cisuralian 290.1 Tortonian Sakmarian archean 11.63 295.0 2800 Serravallian Asselian Meso- Miocene 13.82 298.9 r e c a m b i n P Neogene Langhian Gzhelian archean 15.97 Upper 303.4 3200 Burdigalian Kasimovian Paleo- C e n o z i c 20.44 306.7 Archean archean Aquitanian Penn- Middle Moscovian 23.03 sylvanian 314.6 3600 Chattian Lower Bashkirian Oligocene 28.1 323.2 Eoarchean Rupelian Upper Serpukhovian 33.9 330.9 4000 Priabonian Middle Visean 38.0 Carboniferous 346.7 Hadean (informal) Missis- Bartonian sippian Lower Tournaisian Eocene 41.0 358.9 ~4560 Lutetian Famennian 47.8 Upper 372.2 Ypresian Frasnian Units of the international Paleogene 56.0 382.7 Thanetian Givetian chronostratigraphic scale with 59.2 Middle 387.7 Paleocene Selandian Eifelian estimated numerical ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (Usas): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio
    Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (USAs): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio Colin Plank, Scott Zengel, Heidi Hinkeldey, Elaine Inouye, William Holton, Jeffery Dahlin, and Jacqueline Michel Research Planning, Inc., 1121 Park Street, Columbia, SC 29201, [email protected], 803-256-7322 (voice); 803-254-6445 (fax); and Christina Sames and Samuel Hall, Office of Pipeline Safety, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) is required to identify areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage in the event of a hazardous liquid pipeline accident. Pipeline operators that can affect "unusually sensitive areas" (USAs) must develop and follow an integrity management program to assess and evaluate the integrity of their pipelines. After extensive consultation with experts, government agencies, and other stakeholders, a process was developed to identify USAs for drinking water and ecological resources. In general the USA identification process involves selecting a subset of USA candidates from the larger group of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs), and then applying various filter criteria to the candidates to determine final USAs. For drinking water USAs this means identifying potentially sensitive public water systems (PWS), specifically surface water intakes and ground water wells, and subjecting them to filter
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    information t o u s e r s This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of usefs indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archean Geology of Montana
    THE ARCHEAN GEOLOGY OF MONTANA David W. Mogk,1 Paul A. Mueller,2 and Darrell J. Henry3 1Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana ABSTRACT in a subduction tectonic setting. Jackson (2005) char- acterized cratons as areas of thick, stable continental The Archean rocks in the northern Wyoming crust that have experienced little deformation over Province of Montana provide fundamental evidence long (Ga) periods of time. In the Wyoming Province, related to the evolution of the early Earth. This exten- the process of cratonization included the establishment sive record provides insight into some of the major, of a thick tectosphere (subcontinental mantle litho- unanswered questions of Earth history and Earth-sys- sphere). The thick, stable crust–lithosphere system tem processes: Crustal genesis—when and how did permitted deposition of mature, passive-margin-type the continental crust separate from the mantle? Crustal sediments immediately prior to and during a period of evolution—to what extent are Earth materials cycled tectonic quiescence from 3.1 to 2.9 Ga. These compo- from mantle to crust and back again? Continental sitionally mature sediments, together with subordinate growth—how do continents grow, vertically through mafi c rocks that could have been basaltic fl ows, char- magmatic accretion of plutons and volcanic rocks, acterize this period. A second major magmatic event laterally through tectonic accretion of crustal blocks generated the Beartooth–Bighorn magmatic zone assembled at continental margins, or both? Structural at ~2.9–2.8 Ga.
    [Show full text]