DOCSLIB.ORG

Geotechnical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geotechnical Report Geotechnical Exploration Report The Freese Center State Route 598 Galion, Ohio 44833 Prepared for Galion Port Authority P.O. Box 761 Galion, Ohio 44833 Daniel E Karch, E.I. Project Manager Prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. 4960 Vulcan Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43228 Paul S. Hundley, P.E. July 31, 2020 Geotechnical Dept. Manager/Principal Consultant PSI Project No. 01021746 PSI Project Number: 01021746 The Freese Center July 21, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................................................................. 2 2 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................... 4 2.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 4 2.2 SITE GEOLOGY .................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 5 2.4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ...................................................................................................... 6 2.5 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ............................................................................................................ 6 3 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION ............................................................................................................... 8 3.1 GEOTECHNICAL DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................... 8 4 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 10 4.1 SITE PREPARATION ......................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................. 12 4.2.1 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ............................................................................................ 12 4.2.2 INTERMEDIATE FOUNDATION SYSTEM – AGGREGATE PIERS OR CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMNS .................................................................................................. 13 4.2.3 ACIP PILES .................................................................................................................... 14 4.3 EARTHQUAKE AND SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATION ................................................................. 15 4.4 FLOOR SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 16 4.5 UTILITIES TRENCHING .................................................................................................................... 17 4.6 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................... 17 4.7 PAVEMENT DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE ................................................................................. 19 4.8 SILTATION CONTROL ...................................................................................................................... 19 5 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 20 5.1 MOISTURE SENSITIVE SOILS/WEATHER RELATED CONCERNS ....................................................... 20 5.2 DRAINAGE AND GROUNDWATER CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................... 20 5.3 EXCAVATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 20 6 GEOTECHNICAL RISK .......................................................................................................................... 22 7 REPORT LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 23 APPENDIX - Site Location Map Boring Location Plan Profile Boring Logs Laboratory Test Results USGS Seismic Design Maps Physiographic Regions of Ohio Karst Mapping General Notes Unified Soil Classification Chart (USCS) www.intertek.com/building PSI Project Number: 01021746 The Freese Center July 31, 2020 Page 1 1 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION The following table summarizes, in chronological order, the Project Authorization History for the services performed and represented in this report by Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI). DOCUMENT AND REFERENCE DATE REQUESTED/PROVIDED BY Request for Proposal 06/22/2020 Mr. Eric Kent of Galion Port Authority Daniel Karch, Paul Hundley & Michael Mazzoli of PSI Proposal No.: 0145-304995 06/24/2020 PSI, Inc. Project Authorization 06/25/2020 Mr. Chad Miller of Galion Port Authority 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION According to the provided information and documents, the project involves the proposed 1-story new building, parking lot, stormwater management areas, basketball courts, and soccer field in Galion, Ohio. The following table lists the material and information provided for this project: DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL PROVIDER/SOURCE DATE 200709_Updated boring reference Galion Port Authority 07/12/2020 Map_2020.0712 (dated 07/12/2020) Galion Port Authority 07/12/2020 Freese Site Survey-drawing (PDF version; Galion Port Authority 07/02/2020 dated 06/17/2020) Freese Site Survey-model (DWG version) Galion Port Authority 07/02/2020 The following table lists the structural loads and site features that are estimated for the design basis for the conclusions of this report: www.intertek.com/building PSI Project Number: 01021746 The Freese Center July 31, 2020 Page 2 STURCTURAL LOAD/PROPERTY REQUIREMENT/REPORT BASIS BUILDINGS R* B* Maximum Column Loads 150 kips Maximum Wall Loads 2-3 kips/foot Finish Floor Elevations and type Slab-on-grade (~1145’ – 1147’) Maximum Floor Loads and size 100 psf Settlement Tolerances I’’ Total, ¾” Differential PAVEMENTS Standard automobile and light truck Traffic for Pavement Design traffic GRADING Planned grade variations at site, feet ± 5 ft Utility Depths N/A *“R” = Requirement indicates specific design information was supplied. “B” = Report Basis indicates specific design information was not supplied; therefore, this report is based on this parameter. The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are based on the available project information for the proposed Freese Center project located along State Route 598 in Galion, Crawford County, Ohio, and the subsurface materials described in this report. If any of the information noted above is incorrect, please inform PSI in writing so that we may amend the recommendations presented in this report, if necessary. PSI will not be responsible for the implementation of its recommendations when it is not notified of changes in the project. 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site to prepare recommendations for foundations for the proposed construction. PSI’s contracted scope of services included drilling thirteen (13) soil test borings at the site to depths ranging from 10 to 20 feet below the ground surface, select laboratory testing, and preparation of this geotechnical report. This report briefly outlines the testing procedures, presents available project information, describes the site and subsurface conditions, and presents recommendations regarding the following: • A general assessment of area geology based on our local knowledge and study of available geological literature; • Site preparation as needed for support of foundations and slabs; • Foundation system evaluations and the assessment of the feasibility of utilizing shallow or intermediate foundations; • General location, description of materials encountered in the borings which may interfere with construction progress or structure performance, including existing fills, cobbles/boulders, or organic soils; • Design parameters required for the foundation system, including allowable bearing pressure, minimum foundation width, and foundation bearing levels; • Identification of water levels encountered at the time of drilling; • If odors, soil staining, or other visually evident indications of possible contamination are found while drilling, the client will be notified, and the conditions will be reported on the boring logs; • Identify the swell potential of surface soil based on the laboratory tests, and provide recommendations, if any, for potentially swelling soils; www.intertek.com/building PSI Project Number: 01021746 The Freese Center July 31, 2020 Page 3 • Recommendation of modulus of subgrade reaction, and analysis of the swell potential of surface soil based on index tests; • Recommendations for fill including the selection of materials for use and procedures for placement; • This report incorporating the design parameters and recommendations, with attachments including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terran Cornoration Environmental Services
    Page 11 Terran Cornoration Environmental Services Mr. James Yskamp, Esq. February 1, 2018 Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services 159 South Main Street, Suite 1030 Akron, Ohio 44308 RE: Technical Report Review: "Evaluation of Groundwater Impacts, Dewatering of Proposed Enon Quarry, Clark County, Ohio " Dear Mr. Y skamp, I, Brent E. Huntsman, CPG, President and Principal Hydrogeologist ofTerran Corporation (Terran) was retained by Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services to review and comment upon the hydrogeologic characterization and predicted dewatering effects to the water resources of Mad River Township, Clark County, OH as described in a groundwater model report prepared for a mining permit modification. This report review was to include an evaluation of the aquifer response and hydraulic performance predicted by the model simulations of the groundwater system; the magnitude and extent of a cone of depression resulting from dewatering various limestone quarry pits. The purpose of my review is to provide a letter report summarizing my expert opinions regarding the adequacy of the groundwater model to appropriately simulate dewatering effects upon the local groundwater regime. All opinions in this report are based upon my review of existing information (developed through the litigation process in this case or in the public record) together with my 43-years of experience in applied hydrogeology, specifically aquifer characterization and water resources development. My current curriculum vita is included with this letter report as Attachment 2. These opinions are expressed to a reasonable degree of scientific and professional certainty. I reserve the right to supplement this report and opinions as additional material becomes available through the litigation process or continued review of public literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Waddle Ditch Rattlesnake Creek
    Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05) Prepared for: Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District Prepared by: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Toledo, Ohio Version 1.0 Approved: June 29, 2021 This page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements Version 1.0 prepared and written by: Deanna Bobak Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4841 Monroe Street, Suite 103 Toledo, OH 43623 Brigitte Hisey Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District 1415 US 22 SW, Suite 500 Washington Court House, OH 43160 The Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) would like to acknowledge the collaboration of multiple partners in the preparation of this Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05). The Fayette SWCD appreciates those individuals and organizations that contributed background information, insight into objectives and projects for inclusion in this NPS-IS. Thank you to Rick Wilson, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Division of Surface Water, for guidance throughout the NPS-IS development process, as well as Jessica D’Ambrosio and the staff of The Nature Conservancy for providing modeling data generated by the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). This product or publication was financed in part or totally through a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through an assistance agreement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The contents and views, including any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations, contained in this product or publication are those of the authors and have not been subject to any Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency peer or administrative review and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or the United States Environmental Protection Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch
    International Geoscience Programme Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett – Kyle R. Hartshorn – Allison L. Young – Cameron E. Schwalbach – Alycia L. Stigall International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - 2018 - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Kyle R. Hartshorn Dry Dredgers, 6473 Jayfield Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, USA ([email protected]) Allison L. Young Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Cameron E. Schwalbach 1099 Clough Pike, Batavia, OH 45103, USA ([email protected]) Alycia L. Stigall Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Lab, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our thanks to the many colleagues and students who have aided us in our field work, discussions, and publications, including Chris Aucoin, Ben Dattilo, Brad Deline, Rebecca Freeman, Steve Holland, T.J. Malgieri, Pat McLaughlin, Charles Mitchell, Tim Paton, Alex Ries, Tom Schramm, and James Thomka. No less gratitude goes to the many local collectors, amateurs in name only: Jack Kallmeyer, Tom Bantel, Don Bissett, Dan Cooper, Stephen Felton, Ron Fine, Rich Fuchs, Bill Heimbrock, Jerry Rush, and dozens of other Dry Dredgers. We are also grateful to David Meyer and Arnie Miller for insightful discussions of the Cincinnatian, and to Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Stability Resulting from Rapid Flood Recession Along the Licking River, Kentucky
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________ I, _________________________________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in: It is entitled: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ BANK INSTABILITY RESULTING FROM RAPID FLOOD RECESSION ALONG THE LICKING RIVER, KENTUCKY A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Department of Geology Of the College of Arts and Sciences 2004 by Ana Cristina Londono G. B.S., Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 1995 Committee Chair: Dr. David B. Nash ABSTRACT River bank instability has been linked with changing land use, deforestation and channel meandering. Fluctuations in water level, either seasonal or more frequent, have also been related to instability. Increased pore water pressure has been correlated with flooding. When, the level of water decreases rapidly, the pore water pressure within the soil remains high, thereby decreasing the soil’s effective shear strength. This reduction in shear strength may result in bank failure. The banks of the Licking River near Wilder, Kentucky were selected as a study site because they exhibit instability features: tension cracks, circular and wedge failures, slumps and piping, some of which developed after a major flooding event in 1997. Tensiometers were installed at depth from 4 ft to 10 ft and a piezometer was installed at a depth of 12 ft. The bank material is clay with low plasticity (CL) with total cohesion and friction angle of 27 kPa and 13o respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (Usas): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio
    Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (USAs): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio Colin Plank, Scott Zengel, Heidi Hinkeldey, Elaine Inouye, William Holton, Jeffery Dahlin, and Jacqueline Michel Research Planning, Inc., 1121 Park Street, Columbia, SC 29201, [email protected], 803-256-7322 (voice); 803-254-6445 (fax); and Christina Sames and Samuel Hall, Office of Pipeline Safety, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) is required to identify areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage in the event of a hazardous liquid pipeline accident. Pipeline operators that can affect "unusually sensitive areas" (USAs) must develop and follow an integrity management program to assess and evaluate the integrity of their pipelines. After extensive consultation with experts, government agencies, and other stakeholders, a process was developed to identify USAs for drinking water and ecological resources. In general the USA identification process involves selecting a subset of USA candidates from the larger group of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs), and then applying various filter criteria to the candidates to determine final USAs. For drinking water USAs this means identifying potentially sensitive public water systems (PWS), specifically surface water intakes and ground water wells, and subjecting them to filter
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    information t o u s e r s This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of usefs indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Conodonts of the Estill Shale and Bisher Formation (Silurian, Southern Ohio): Biostratigraphy and Distribution1
    78 M. A. LAMB AND R. L. LOWE Vol. 87 Conodonts of the Estill Shale and Bisher Formation (Silurian, Southern Ohio): Biostratigraphy and Distribution1 MARK A. KLEFFNER, Department of Geology and Mineralogy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 ABSTRACT. Representatives of 20 species of conodonts have been isolated from samples of the Silurian Estill Shale and Bisher Formation at four localities in southern Ohio. The Estill belongs in the amorphognathoides Zone and is late Llandoverian to early Wenlockian. The Estill-Bisher contact is an unconformity. In Adams and southern Highland counties, the Bisher belongs in the middle and upper ranuliformis Zone and is late early to possibly early middle Wenlockian; in northern Highland County the Bisher belongs in the lower ranuliformis Zone and is middle early to late early Wenlockian. The Estill was deposited in a gradually shoaling sea that regressed from Adams and Highland counties in the early Wenlockian. The sea transgressed south- ward across the two counties later in the early Wenlockian and deposited the Bisher in a shallow, subtidal environment. OHIO J. SCI. 87 (3): 78-89, 1987 INTRODUCTION Highland County, Ohio. North of Fleming County, Kentucky, an unconformity separates the Noland and The Estill Shale and overlying Bisher Formation make Estill (Rexroad and Kleffner 1984). up most of the lower Niagaran sequence (Silurian) in The Estill Shale consists predominantly of blue-green, Adams and Highland counties in southern Ohio. The gray-green, green, and brown shale. Shale beds are com- first, and only detailed, published report on conodonts monly blocky or massive in the lower part of the for- from either the Estill or Bisher was by Rexroad and mation and silty and fissile in the upper part.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silurian of Central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, Palaeoenvironments and Palaeoecology
    The Silurian of central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology FRANK R. ETTENSOHN, R. THOMAS LIERMAN, CHARLES E. MASON, WILLIAM M. ANDREWS, R. TODD HENDRICKS, DANIEL J. PHELPS & LAWRENCE A. GORDON ETTENSOHN, F.R., LIERMAN, R.T., MASON, C.E., ANDREWS, W.M., HENDRICKS, R.T., PHELPS, D.J. & GORDON, L.A., 2013:04:26. The Silurian of central Kentucky, U.S.A.: Stratigraphy, palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 44, 159-189. ISSN 0810-8889. Silurian rocks in Kentucky are exposed on the eastern and western flanks of the Cincinnati Arch, a large-wavelength cratonic structure separating the Appalachian foreland basin from the intracratonic Illinois Basin. The Cincinnati Arch area experienced uplift during latest Ordovician-early Silurian time, so that the exposed Silurian section is relatively thin due to onlap and post- Silurian erosional truncation on the arch. On both flanks of the arch, dolomitic carbonates predominate, but the section on the eastern side reflects a more shale-rich ramp that faced eastern Appalachian source areas. In the Silurian section on the western side of the arch, which apparently developed across a platform-like isolation-accommodation zone, shales are rare except dur- ing some highstand episodes, and rocks in the area reflect deposition across a broad, low-gradient shelf area, interrupted by structurally controlled topographic breaks. Using the progression of interpreted depositional environments and nearshore faunal communities, a relative sea-level curve, which parallels those of previous workers, was generated for the section in Kentucky. While the curve clearly shows the influence of glacial eustasy, distinct indications of the far-field, flexural influence of Taconian and Salinic tectonism are also present.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Ohio—The Ordovician
    A Quarterly Publication of the Division of Geological Survey Fall 1997 THE GEOLOGY OF OHIO—THE ORDOVICIAN by Michael C. Hansen o geologists, the Ordovician System of Ohio bulge), accompanying development of a foreland is probably the most famous of the state’s basin to the east at the edge of the orogenic belt. As Paleozoic rock systems. The alternating shales the Taconic Orogeny reached its zenith in the Late Tand limestones of the upper part of this system crop Ordovician, sediments eroded from the rising out in southwestern Ohio in the Cincinnati region mountains were carried westward, forming a com- and yield an incredible abundance and diversity of plex delta system that discharged mud into the well-preserved fossils. Representatives of this fauna shallow seas that covered Ohio and adjacent areas. reside in museums and private collections through- The development of this delta, the Queenston Delta, out the world. Indeed, fossils from Ohio’s Ordovi- is recorded by the many beds of shale in Upper cian rocks define life of this geologic period, and the Ordovician rocks exposed in southwestern Ohio. rocks of this region, the Cincinnatian Series, serve The island arcs associated with continental as the North American Upper Ordovician Standard. collision were the sites of active volcanoes, as docu- Furthermore, in the late 1800’s, Ordovician rocks in mented by the widespread beds of volcanic ash the subsurface in northwestern Ohio were the source preserved in Ohio’s Ordovician rocks (see Ohio of the first giant oil and gas field in the country. Geology, Summer/Fall 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Thirty-First Annual Field Conference of the Section of Geology Combined with the Sections of Plant Science and Conservation of the Ohio Academy of Science
    GUIDE TO THIRTY-FIRST ANNUAL FIELD CONFERENCE OF THE SECTION OF GEOLOGY COMBINED WITH THE SECTIONS OF PLANT SCIENCE AND CONSERVATION OF THE OHIO ACADEMY OF SCIENCE APRIL 213 1956 THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE SPRINGFIELD AREA CHAIRMEN OF SECTIONS TOUR COMMITTEE Lee Walp, Plant Science Floyd Nave E. S. Thomas Robert Finlay, Conservation kenneth Hunt George Burns John Melvin, Geology John Lounsbury Daniel R. Atzenhoefer £. T. Bodenberg C. N. Savage K, * GEOLCGIC COLUMN The f-ilcwi:i£ chart sh ws that part ..if the gecl-gic column of Ohio that might be expected in Clark County and adjacent ;.:rtions of Greene and Champaign Counties. THICKNESS SYSTEM GROUP FORMATION DESCRIPTION fFe pt) Ground and end moraine, outwash, kames, Mid.die Wisconsin- drift 0 to 60 and valley-train deposit's PIe i stoce ne Quaternary Early Wisconsin drift Extensive gravel outwash and kames 5 to 200 series Mostly fine sand filling buried valleys. Pre-Wiscons in drift 0 to 400 Perhaps some till. Cedarville dolomite Massive, porous, dolomitic limestone 5 to 150? Springfield dolomite Thin-bedded and dense 10 to 15 Euphemia dolomite Massive and porous 6 to 8 S ilur ian Nia garan Massie shale Calcareous and dense 4 to 5 Laurel dolomite Thin-bedded and dense 5 Os go od shale Calcareous with limestone beds 20 to 25 Dayton. 1 inaestone Thin-bedded and dense 6 to 8 Beds of Cli nton Fossilif erous, massive to irregularly Brassfield limestone 30 a ge be dde d Shale, soft, calcareous, interbedded with Richmond, and O rdovi c ia n thin hard limestone layers; called the 1 yOCO-f M aysville Cincinnati shale in old reports GO S H EN :-7-\-~\\~i '5cge — OAYUGAN, -- - " "~ — ^.
    [Show full text]
  • Calibrating Water Depths of Ordovician Communities
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2015, 64, 1, 19–23 doi: 10.3176/earth.2015.04 Calibrating water depths of Ordovician communities: lithological and ecological controls on depositional gradients in Upper Ordovician strata of southern Ohio and north-central Kentucky, USA Carlton E. Bretta, Thomas J. Malgieria, James R. Thomkab, Christopher D. Aucoina, Benjamin F. Dattiloc and Cameron E. Schwalbacha a Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b Department of Geosciences, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, USA; [email protected] c Department of Geoscience, Indiana University-Purdue University-Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805, USA; [email protected] Received 2 July 2014, accepted 13 October 2014 Abstract. Limestone and shale facies of the Upper Ordovician Grant Lake Formation (Katian: Cincinnatian, Maysvillian) are well exposed in the Cincinnati Arch region of southern Ohio and north-central Kentucky, USA. These rocks record a gradual change in lithofacies and biofacies along a gently northward-sloping ramp. This gradient spans very shallow, olive-gray, platy, laminated dolostones with sparse ostracodes in the south to offshore, nodular, phosphatic, brachiopod-rich limestones and marls in the north. This study uses facies analysis in outcrop to determine paleoenvironmental parameters, particularly those related to water depth (e.g., position of the photic zone and shoreline, relative degree of environmental energy). Within a tightly correlated stratigraphic interval (the Mount Auburn and Straight Creek members of the Grant Lake Formation and the Terrill Member of the Ashlock Formation), we document the occurrence of paleoenvironmental indicators, including desiccation cracks and light-depth indicators, such as red and green algal fossils and oncolites.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Pa Element, OSU 41751, X 28, Collection
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Accessing theUMI World’s Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8820S06 Taxonomy and biostratigraphic significance of Wenlockian and Ludlovian (Silurian) conodonts in the midcontinent outcrop area, North America Kleffner, Mark Alan, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy.
    [Show full text]